Showing posts with label Mayor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mayor. Show all posts

Kauai 2018 Voting Recommendations

SUBHEAD: Island Breath's endorsements for Kauai Primary Election on 11 August 2018.

By Linda Pascatore on 26 July 2018 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2016/07/our-primary-voting-recommendations.html)


http://www.islandbreath.org/2018Year/07/180727councilbig.jpg
Image above: Kauai County Council members 2016-2018. L to R: Mason Chock, Arthur Brun, Mel Rapozo, Joann Yukimura, Ross Kagawa, Derek Kawakami and Arryl Kaneshiro. Mashup image by Juan Wilson. Click image to enlarge.

Register to Vote, Find your Polling Place, or View your Ballot here: https://elections.hawaii.gov/

Primary Voting Schedule
  • Early Walk In Voting for Primary: July 30 to Aug 9 at Historic County Building basement.
  • Last day to request Mail in Ballot: August 4
  • Primary Elections: August 11 - Polls open 7am to 6pm
Island Breath picks are based on general progressive, liberal positions, with an emphasis on sustainability, the environment, peace, equality, and Hawaiian Sovereignty.  We followed some of the  recommendations from the Sierra Club and Pono Hawaii Initiative.

Our recommended candidates are in italics with larger print.

We found information on candidates records and positions on the League of Women Voters (http://www.vote411.org/ballot), Votesmart (https://votesmart.org/), and also in articles profiling individual candidates in Civil Beat and The Garden Island.

On the primary ballot there are two sections: on one you choose a party and vote only for those candidates; the other section is non-partisan--everyone votes for the County Contests and the Office of Hawaiian Affairs.  We are choosing from the Democratic candidates on the party affiliated section.

Democratic Party


US Senator:

* Hirono, Mazie
 


US Representative, District II (Kauai)
* Gabbard, Tulsi



Governor:
* Ige, David Y.



Lieutenant Governor:
* Iwamoto, Kim Coco


District 14: 
Nadine Nakamura is running unopposed for the Democratic nomination.  We do not endorse her.



District 15: 
Elaine Daladig is running against incumbent James Tokioka for the Democratic nomination.  We do not endorse either candidate.


District 16:
* Morikawa, Daynette (Dee)



Non-Partisan

Everyone, no matter which party affiliation, can vote for Kauai Mayor and County Council and OHA (Office of Hawaiian affairs) trustees.


Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA): Oahu Resident Trustee

* Kia'aina, Esther


Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA): At-Large Trustee:
(vote for three)

* Aila, William J., Jr.

* Paikai, Landen D.K.K.

* Paris, Makana


Mayor:
* Yukimura, JoAnn A.


Kauai County Council: 
Special Note: Island Breath is recommending voting for no more than the three candidates noted below, even though you are allowed to vote for seven.  If you vote for seven, but really support just three candidates, your #4, 5, 6 and 7 votes could enable those other candidates to win over your top candidates.  Consider voting for fewer--a practice called "plunking".

* Chock, Mason

* Cowden, Felicia

* Roversi, Adam P.
 


See also:
Recommended by Gary Hooser; Executive Director of the Pono Hawaii Initiative
(https://ponohawaiiinitiative.org/endorsements)


.
.

No need for $7m from state

SUBHEAD: Kauai County considers asking state of Hawaii for millions to fund public works programs.

By Juan Wilson on 12 November 2015 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2015/11/no-need-for-7m-from-state.html)


Image above: Painting of typical "illegal" westside ohana beach scene by Emily Miller ~ 2006. Print scanned by Juan Wilson.

Below is an article from the Garden Island News reporting on plans to consider asking the state of Hawaii for $7 million for "capital improvements", some to be directed to the Salt Pond area of the Hanapepe - Eleele area where I live.

My take on this plan is to suggest it be broken up into separate issues, and the overall plan to be abandoned. I admit to having conflicting opinions on some of the issues in the plan.

For example, I am against people driving for recreation along the shore break or off-roading in the dunes behind the beach. However,  I see a need for residents to have access to beaches where there are not roads available (as illustrated in the image above).

Adolescent Treatment Facility
To begin with, it seems to me $5 million dollars from the state to house 8 beds of troubled teens seems inappropriate.

Essentially, the state sponsored adolescent treatment facility will be a minimum security prison. Over the last decade Kauai communities have rejected every attempt to site such a facility.

Here in Hanapepe the community pushed back on the plan to convert the former Humane Society facility on Lolokai Road near Salt Pond Beach Park. Similar rejections occurred in other suggested communities on Kauai. Can't Kauai communities find some more humane way to take care of eight of its own children?

Veteran's Cemetery Improvements
This cemetery, located on Lele Road,  is near Salt Pond Beach Park. It is one of several cemeteries in the area. There is the Hawaiian, the Chinese, and the Filipino Cemetery, the last of which is adjacent to the Veteran's site.

Neither the state or county take any interest or provides any maintenance for these other facilities and it shows. Why doesn't the County Council see a need in these other near?

According to the National Cemetery Administration the cemetery is owned and operated by a State of Hawaii. The state has not applied for and received a Veteran's Administration grant to establish, expand or improve this veterans cemetery.

Perhaps the Kauai County Council ask the state of Hawaii to apply for such funding to achieve the county's improvement goals.

It should be noted that this cemetery just completed a major improvement with a new garage and shop facility and major landscaping.

Centralized Vehicle Maintenance
Over time I think it will only make sense not to have single county facilities for services like the landfill, or a single vehicle maintenance facility. It may have some economic advantage today, but over time that will not be the case.

The idea that every bag of Hanalei kitchen garbage must require a trip around the island by twenty-ton truck will seem increasingly wasteful. So is driving a public works truck around the island for an oil change.

Besides the wasted energy, pollution and traffic congestion there is the damaging impacts of such trucks have on our  roads can be measured using an Equivalent Single Axle Load (ESAL) formula. A standard passenger car has an ESAL of .0007, while a 3-axle garbage truck has an ESAL of 1.0. This means one trip by a 3-axle garbage truck is equivalent to 1,429 car trips. See (http://www.titanrecycleandtrash.com/garbage_trucks_on_your_roads).

County and state services should be spread out regionally on the island, not centralized. Again, why should anyone have to drive from Kekaha to Lihue to renew a driver's license.

Salt Pond Master Plan
This ancient Hawaiian salt gathering site is on land "owned" by the State of Hawaii. Up until the 1960's it was used, maintained and operated by independent Hawaiian families.

Other ethnic groups became part of this community over the last century - Japanese, Filipinos, Portuguese, etc. Some time in the early 60's a group of families organized a hui (group, club, partnership, union, gang) to manage the Salt Pond area. The hui insisted that all of the families join them and pay an annual dues or lose their right to gather salt.

Some local families stayed and defied the hui. Politics continue to exist at Salt Ponds. It is my opinion that the proposed "improvements" for Salt Pond may be related to these politics and will have an negative effect by institutionalizing and officiating by the government of real Hawaiian ways of doing things.

The Salt Pond gathering area is bounded on the north by the approach from Lokolai Road, on the east by Kaalani Road and on the south by Kuiloko Road. There is a parking lot at the west end of Kuiloko Road that is used by many of the Salt Pond gatherers.

When my wife and I moved to Kauai in 2001, the area between the Hanapepe Airport fence and Salt Ponds was open and wide. People drove through this area to reach the beach from the west end of Kuiloko Road.

Particularly in the winter this area would be flooded by salty rain water. People would splash through the area in four-wheel drive to reach the beach to the west to hang out at sunset. Some people believed this traffic could contaminate the Salt Ponds. An effort was made to control this traffic by laying down a string of large boulders to contain this traffic near the airport fence line.

This seemed a pretty good solution to me. The law of the state does not allow access onto the beach by automobiles. However, I believe that people should not drive along the beach but should be able to reach the beach with there vehicles.

This position kind of straddles the current rules.  Keep in mind that the state, the military and the rich keep reducing the areas that can be accessed for recreation, hunting and fishing for the rest of us. Why else would we live here without access to the beach?

Up until 2001 westsiders had four-wheel access from Kekaha to Poli Hale - the longest stretch of beach in the state of Hawaii. Surfcasters, campers, off-roaders used this access everyday until the World Trade Centers came down.

The PMRF cut that off then and continues to do so to this day as a matter of  "security". The upside is that surfcasters will tell you that the fish that were waning are back in force along this stretch of beach.

The beach driving law is flaunted in a number of locations, like Poli Hale, Hanalei Black Pond Beach, Kekaha Beach, etc. For many on the westside car access to the beach is a way of life. It is a primary element in recreation for many families. Friday nights along the southern shore of Salt Pond Beach includes dozens of families that eat, party and relax together every week.

The current discussion about Salt Pond by the county includes blocking off the beach to automobile traffic altogether. That will not be popular.

Problems related to access for recreation and conflicting the state laws are not resolved.

Problems at the top
Back in 2006  then mayor Bryan Baptiste  was interested in building a large stadium at Puolo Point on the state land south of Hanapepe Airport that would have included a drag strip. He told the community that the county could have use of the land, on a long term lease for a $1 and acre per year from the State Department of Transportation.

Nadine Nakamura, a planner, was hired as a "facilitator" for a meeting with the "community" at Eleeele Elementary School. This plan was a very unpopular idea in the community. Neighbors  overwhelmingly wanted that area left alone.

No parking, no public restrooms, no stadium or drag strip... just nature and access to it. Nadine was smart enough to see what the people wanted and did not try to jam Baptiste's plan down our throughts. She, in fact, encouraged the community to act itself to determine Puolo Point's future. Baptiste was so upset that he ended the meeting telling the community that if they did not want his plan he would reject the lease offer from the state.

Since then there has been some change to Puolo Point. A helicopter chartering company illegally built a hanger and refueling station without a Special Management Area shoreline permit that was required.

A few homeless people have camped there for a while. The response of the State Department of Transportation was to put up "No Trespassing" all along the Ala Loa trail used by fishermen and the community. The fact is it is hard to camp there for long due to flying roaches, stinging ants and strong winds.

I suspect that if the state gets more involved with the Salt Pond, Puolo Point area that there will be a greater reduction of access for all of us.

Nadine Nakamura was voted onto the Kauai County Council a few years back. I supported her and voted for her. In 2013 there was great controversy over Gary Hooser's bill to manage pesticide use by Big Ag. Bill 2491 was eventually passed after modification by Nadine and JoAnne Yukimura, who both supported the bill.

Nadine was hired by the mayor as County Managing Director, a $100K position and left the council, right at the time of the crucial vote.  Mayor Carvallho then vetoed the bill but it was eventually overridden by the Council.  This was only because Mason Chock, who also supported the bill, was approved as Nadine's replacement just in the nick of time before the vote.

My point is, that Nadine is going to be the mayor's hammer on this $7 million dollar set of proposals. She will not likely to be the same woman I admired in 2006 as an advocate of the community.

See also:
Island Breath: Puolo Point Plan Meeting 5/26/06

Ea O Ka Aina: Bill 2491 into the home stretch 9/2/13
Ea O Ka Aina: GMO Bill 2491 Endgame Strategies 9/26/13
Ea O Ka Aina: GMO Bill 2491 Morphs 10/4/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Nakamura to replace Heu 10/14/13
Ea O Ka Aina: GMO Bill 2491 passes 6-110/16/13



County may seek $7M from State

By Jesica Else on 10 November 2015 for the Garden Island -
(http://thegardenisland.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/county-may-seek-m-from-state/article_f415d75b-06df-5f1a-8c8d-1d309f6a4d06.html)


Image above: New "No Trespassing - No Camping" DOT sign at Puolo along the Ala Loa trail at Point in August of 2013.  Isn't this a place where people should be able to camp and fish. Photo by Juan Wilson.

The County Council is discussing a list of projects that will go before the state Legislature for potential general obligation bond funding opportunities.

There are five projects on the Capitol Improvement Project funding list — $5 million for an adolescent treatment and healing center, $550,000 for a centralized auto maintenance facility, $400,000 to go toward the Salt Pond master plan, $500,000 for a helicopter hangar for the Kauai Fire Department, and $700,000 for construction and improvements at the Veterans’ Cemetery facility.

Nadine Nakamura, county managing director, and Keith Suga, county CIP manager, presented the five projects to the County Council.

The council ultimately decided the list needed further discussion in committee meetings before it is revisited at the next council meeting Nov. 18.

“I’m not adverse to anything on this list; however, I am not supportive (of approving this list) on the fact that there is more work that needs to be done on some of these items,” said Councilmember Mason Chock. “I am looking forward to having a more in-depth discussion on this and see how we can move forward with this list.”

The council was in full agreement with having the helicopter hangar, the Salt Pond master plan and the Veterans’ Cemetery facility on the list, but members needed more clarification on the other two items. Some councilmembers said they were hoping to see different things included on the list altogether.

“You look at the list and think it’s all worthwhile projects, but I ask where is the housing and the traffic and the roadway improvements?” Councilmember Gary Hooser said. “Then you start to see what is lacking and as I understand, general obligation bonds can be used for just about any capitol improvement project.”

Rep. Daynette Morikawa said Monday that Kauai has done “very well” when it comes to securing state funding, and she’s optimistic that the county will get some money from the legislature this year.
“It is always tough to get projects funded, but we, the Kauai Legislators, do our very best to work as a team in supporting all Kauai requests,” Morikawa said.

Salt Pond Master Plan
On the current list, there is a request for $400,000 for a master plan project to look at how to preserve the salt making culture on Kauai.

“The Salt Pond master plan is necessary to protect the salt beds and plan for better use of facilities which will preserve open space and allow for cultural information and history,” Morikawa said.

Director of Parks and Recreation Lenny Rapozo said there are several projects in the works at Salt Pond through Public Works, and this is a separate project that takes a look at how the county administration is working with area residents and families.

“This project is dealing with the stewardship of the salt makers,” said George Costa, director of the county’s Office of Economic Development. “We know that vehicles and people are in the salt area and part of the master plan is to discuss it with the families (so we can preserve the salt ponds).”

Costa said the department has looked at blocking off the beach to traffic, building a platform so folks can view the salt ponds without disturbing them, and adding salt-making demonstrations in the park.

“The goal is to work very closely with the community advisory group, and there will be multiple meetings to get a product that everyone can feel good about and sets a clear vision about what can happen in this area,” Nakamura said.

Adolescent Treatment and Healing Center
The plan asks the Legislature for $5 million to build an adolescent treatment and healing center on Kauai.

There are drug and alcohol treatment centers for adolescents on Neighbor Islands, but there isn’t a 24-hour facility on Kauai.

The center is in its beginning phase, with one feasibility study conducted in 2013 and an update in the works.

It would be a cluster of buildings that would be residential and a facility for group therapy, then there would be classroom space, Nakamura said. There will be about eight beds in the facility.

Councilmember JoAnn Yukimura questioned whether the administration had fully thought through putting the treatment center on the general obligation bond list.

“Isn’t it premature to be asking the Legislature for money before you have even the basic information about how this building is going to be used and operated?” Yukimura asked.

Hooser said he didn’t think there was a very high likelihood of the center receiving funding because there’s such a high demand for money from the Legislature.

Councilmember Ross Kagawa, however, said he thought the center should remain on the list.

“I’d rather have the state pay the $5 million than the county because it’s the state’s job anyway,” Kagawa said. “Our youth are better served here on the same island as where they live.”

Centralized auto maintenance facility
Currently there is one Public Works auto shop, built in 1978, that supports all 180 of the Kauai Police Department vehicles, which are among about 450 vehicles in various departments. The shop also supports the transportation and bus system’s growing fleet.

“The idea here is to create a centralized shop that would house repairs, not only for all of what Public Works currently does, but also the transportation agency’s units,” Suga said.

Suga said the idea is to also incorporate the fire department’s maintenance needs at the new facility.

Yukimura said the idea was basically sound, but she thought more emphasis needs to be put onto the transportation department’s buses.

“I’m concerned about transportation not getting the priority it needs to keep things up and running,” Yukimura said. “People need those buses to get to work.”

Last year, Kauai County got about $5 million in general obligation bonds from the state, and councilmembers said they thought it was reasonable to expect around the same amount again.
“If the Legislature has $4 million to give us, they’ll decide which project to fund,” Kagawa said.

He suggested that the County Council take a look at the current list and bring their own ideas forward throughout the week, so that the list is backed by a united front when it goes before the Legislature.

The County Council has set a deadline of Nov. 27 for the package, which gives them about three weeks for final approval. The list will be in committees until the next council session, where it will again be on the floor for discussion.

.

Maui's future is being created now

SUBHEAD: The many decisions we face mean that Maui’s future will probably be significantly different from today.

By Dick Mayer on 2 October 2015 for the Maui News -
(https://www.facebook.com/mauitomorrow.org/photos/a.10153474845360655.1073741825.489942260654/10156078868640655/)


Image above: Dow AgroScience GMO worker on Maui. The future of agriculture? From (http://www.civilbeat.com/2014/11/monsanto-agrigenetics-sue-to-invalidate-maui-county-gmo-farming-ban/).

Maui is at an important crossroad. Major decisions are being made that will affect every resident and shape our beloved island’s communities and environment. These decisions and their timely implementation will allow us to control anticipated events and may prepare us to react effectively to events beyond our control.

Changes and Challenges:
A) Our agricultural future may face the biggest changes. Numerous forces raise a cloud over HC&S’s sugar operations, including increased concern over the health effects of cane smoke; legal challenges to restore water flow to East Maui streams; reduced electricity sales to Maui Electric; and decreased revenues due to low world sugar prices. Economics may be the decider, and that includes A&B’s desire to “bank” its valuable lands and retain water rights.

In addition, the courts will decide whether Monsanto can continue to grow and experiment with GMO crops on Maui due to health concerns that led to an initiative against GMO agricultural practices by Maui County residents.

Concurrently, there is a movement to make Maui agriculturally self-sufficient and organically healthier. Will Maui’s corporate agriculture be replaced by a more diversified, sustainable agriculture?

B) Our Maui County government has operated with a “Strong-Mayor” format for many decades and may be in serious need of a different structure. Most local governments of Maui’s size utilize a “Council + County Manager” structure where a professional County Manager and department heads are selected based on experience and qualifications, rather than on political connections, “name recognition,” or as a reward for loyal followers. In 2016 residents may vote for a Charter change.

C) Due to the uncontrolled growth of luxury homes that drive up home costs and rental fees, local families are becoming frustrated that their children are being forced to leave Maui. Our County government will need to regulate McMansions and provide for additional work-force housing in livable neighborhoods with proper infrastructure.

D) Our hospital’s management will change from public (State control) to a private operation. To balance its budget will Kaiser cut back on services? Dismiss employees? Raise rates?

E) Our Time-Warner cable system, plus much of our internet and telephone service may be taken over by Charter Communications which doesn’t have the highest reputation. Will the Hawaii DCCA actively protect consumers with tough, pro-active negotiation of contracts and subsequent strict enforcement of conditions? How will Maui’s local Akaku station fare?

F) Maui’s electricity future will change if Hawaii’s Public Utility Commission allows Florida-based NextEra to take over the Hawaiian Electric Company monopoly, including its MECO subsidiary. However, Maui County is now investigating alternative energy management opportunities: a Maui-based public utility, or a consumer-owned cooperative like Kauai’s.

G) Electricity production and distribution may adjust to reflect a need to reduce electricity costs, control climate change, and become less dependent on imported fuels. Solar, wind, and geothermal could play a larger role, especially if we decide to be less reliant on a large centralized power plant and more comfortable with distributed production and local battery capability.

H) Will high tourism employment continue if the County persists in allowing hotels to transform into timeshares with a reduced need for hotel and restaurant employees? With many unemployed workers, wages may be reduced for the remaining workers resulting in housing and rental costs becoming even less affordable.

I) Beyond our local control, but nevertheless significant, are several natural environment trends: modified weather patterns that may mean reduced and more variable rainfall, making agriculture less secure; decreased comforting trade winds; and rising sea levels, forcing Maui to restrict public and private shoreline construction.

J) The County administration’s proposal to push for direct international flights from some Asian cities could open Maui to serious pests for which we are unprepared. The administration wants to allow tourists to have passports checked at the departure airport, but is making no provision for needed inspections of potential invasive species, especially from tropical cities.

The many decisions we face mean that Maui’s future will probably be significantly different from today. Our leaders will need to make politically difficult choices that can reduce negative consequences and enhance benefits. Will they (and we) be up to it? The answers will determine Maui’s future.


.

Lihue loss of vision

SUBHEAD: A deeper planning question is how do we prepare Kauai (and Hawaii) to be sustainable and resilient.

By Juan Wilson on 5 September 2014 for Island Breath-
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2014/09/lihue-loss-of-vision.html)


Image above: Pat Griffin, president of the Lihue Business Association (L), discuss aspects of Nawiliwili with Melissa White (R) a consultant with SSFM International during public community meeting. Note presentation board is titled "Desired Patterns of Future Growth & Development". Photo by Dennis Fujimoto.

Yesterday the Garden Island News published a story titled "Lihue's Vision". The takeaway of this article is summed up in the subhead:
 "Plans say 9,000 new housing units needed over the next 20 years."
Another angle on this view into the future, not simply based on the current trajectory of growth, might take into consideration the likelihood that the economic, energy and environmental realities twenty years out will not support that trajectory of growth.

A deeper planning question is how do we prepare Kauai (and Hawaii) to be sustainable and resilient in the future that is playing out in reality... not the one that is an exponential projection of our bad choices to date.

The TGI article is short, so I have reproduced it below.

Been here before?
 I did not attend this meeting but the article makes it sound very familiar. It briefly describes the "community outreach" by the Kauai County Planning Commission (and its experts) in its ceaseless effort to accommodate more development on our island.

The meeting was a public meeting to acquaint the residents from Puhi-Lihue-Hanamaulu area with what's heading their way.  

The usual elements were there - talk of fixing traffic problems, providing more pedestrian amenities, using smart growth thinking and green planning techniques. It's the current form of feelgood evasive jargon spouted by highly regarded experts who want to sell you a bridge to nowhere.

In this case the expert was Cheryl Soon PhD, a hired gun from the project management firm SSFM International. Their mission statement ends (https://www.ssfm.com/AboutUs_Mission.htm#):

"Our extensive expertise in engineering, project management, planning, and construction management is built upon a platform of knowledge-based systems, and we leverage that to service our clients."
 In other words, they never saw a speculative development expansion they didn't like. And they have the muscle to push that project through - if you pay them enough.

Dr. Soon said:
"The plan is a community driven direction for growth and allows private parties to know ahead of time if their plans will fit and be favorably received..."
 The Jargon of Growth
This is jargon for setting it up so that if the plan is accepted by the community, the private developers will know their individual schemes will get approval from Planning without the usual rigmarole of have to grovel in endless public meetings. 

So, not only are we paying for a Planning Department that justifies its existence on the approval and management of new development on Kauai, but that must to go outside experts to convince us of the validity of their "vision".

Our county mayor, Bernard Carvalho, was present to add his wisdom in the issue of planning:
"We look from the past to add on to the present and incorporate some of the technologies of today and hopefully the future to make better opportunities."
What the fuck does that mean?

Public Gets Wise?
The TGI article also makes it plain that the meeting did not go quite as smoothly as had been anticipated or hoped for.

The TGI article mentions a few rough spots for the presenters:
"A small but outspoken group was on hand for the Lihue Community Plan meeting Wednesday at the War Memorial Convention Hall."
"The group of 20 people present expressed concern in many areas. They cautioned planners that the urban edge zoning allowed for oceanfront lots north of Hanamaulu Beach. It gave the appearance of the government allowing luxury development and could create conflict with the vision.

Some were skeptical of the plan’s claim that the county and Grove Farm water supply was adequate for sustained growth, and that all developers had to do is build infrastructure to transmit water to projects.

Guests were concerned as much with consistent sidewalks as with bike paths. Others wanted to see more detail on how bypass roads would be utilized, more tree replacement projects and long-term burial of utility lines."
Leanora Kaiaokamalie, a planner with the County Planning Department said:
"It was a very intense public process, it’s long overdue, and I am looking forward to see this all come to fruition."

Remember back on May 23rd when the Garden Island published "Beating the Traffic Rush"? It covered another public presentation on a bypass road mauka of the Kuhio Highway that would start in Puhi and rejoin the highway in Hamamaulu. Is there any possibility that it and the current article are related?

We said then in Tales of a dark Kauai:
"This describes a $120 million dollar highway boondoggle bypass road mauka of the current highway between Puhi and Hanamaulu. I won't happen for a very long time but it will be the backbone for more development, more traffic and a loss of important agland."



LIHUE'S VISION
TGI 9/4/2014

A small but outspoken group was on hand for the Lihue Community Plan meeting Wednesday at the War Memorial Convention Hall. 
The seven chapter Lihue Community Plan outlines the boundaries of development and provides a principled vision for planning responsible land use through 2035. The goal is a more cohesive and walkable community that maintains the integrity of it character without segregation.

“It was a very intense public process, it’s long overdue, and I am looking forward to see this all come to fruition,” said Leanora Kaiaokamalie, a planner with the County Planning Department. “The implementing is going to take work but hopefully we set the framework to support all of those who are wanting to move in that direction.”

Cheryl Soon, Ph.D., a planning group manager from SSFM International, facilitated the presentation, emphasizing that demographics show a need for 9,000 new housing units over the next 20 years. The plan draws out an “Urban Edge Boundary” to define limits of urban development for best use and protection of ag land and natural resources.

The plan is a community driven direction for growth and allows private parties to know ahead of time if their plans will fit and be favorably received, she said. Public comments will be received until Sept. 12.

The group of 20 people present expressed concern in many areas. They cautioned planners that the urban edge zoning allowed for oceanfront lots north of Hanamaulu Beach. It gave the appearance of the government allowing luxury development and could create conflict with the vision.

Some were skeptical of the plan’s claim that the county and Grove Farm water supply was adequate for sustained growth, and that all developers had to do is build infrastructure to transmit water to projects.

Guests were concerned as much with consistent sidewalks as with bike paths. Others wanted to see more detail on how bypass roads would be utilized, more tree replacement projects and long-term burial of utility lines.

Mayor Bernard P. Carvalho Jr., said the plan shows how Lihue and neighboring towns are spread out and how to interconnect in ways that require less cars. It started with the Complete Streets resolution.

This is a high density area and the places to expand include behind Walmart, and near Wilcox Memorial Hospital, near the back portion of the stadium area.

“We look from the past to add on to the present and incorporate some of the technologies of today and hopefully the future to make better opportunities,” he said.


See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: Abercrombie booed on PLDC 9/20/12



.

Dustin Barca for Mayor

SOURCE: Ken Taylor (taylork021@hawaii.rr.com)
SUBHEAD: "It’s all about the future generations and our vision for Kauai is for them."

By Staff on 9 May 2014 for the Hawaii Independent -
(http://hawaiiindependent.net/story/dustin-barca-enters-race-for-kauai-mayor)


Image above: Dustin Barca dstands in Hanalei Valley on Kauai, Hawaii. From original article.

Dustin Barca enters race for Kauai mayor.

Professional surfer, environmental activist, father, MMA fighter and Kauai Boy Dustin Barca announced today that he will seek the office of Kaua`i County Mayor in the 2014 elections. As part of his run for Mayor, Barca will paddle and run around the entire island of Kauai from May 29-June 1, paying tribute to and connecting with the people, ‘aina (land, “that which feeds us”) and cultural sites of the island.

While this is Barca’s first bid at political office, he has been involved in local politics for much of his young adult life. Driven by a strong sense of kuleana (responsibility and privilege) to Kaua`i and its people, he sees local government as a way to deepen his service:

“I was so lucky to grow up on Kauai, learning from my elders about our sacred and unique ‘aina. The purpose of the run is to bring to life our vision, our dream of what our island should be and can be. We can be a blue print for the rest of the islands and the world by restoring and protecting our heiau, fishponds, iwi kupuna, our ahupua’a and agricultural lands. A way for our people and especially the next generations to have a connection with our island, mentally, physically, emotionally and spiritually by using these areas for educational purposes and managing tourism so that we will become the ultimate place for locals and visitors. We can be a farming epicenter where food production is our number one, reversing our 90% food import with 90% food production. It’s all about the future generations and our vision for Kaua‘i is for them.”

While Barca may be best known for his activism related to environmental justice and the impacts of the agrochemical industry on Kauai, he is also passionately committed to democratic participation, local agricultural food production, access to healthy foods, cultural revival, protecting Kauai’s most vital water resources, sustainable energy and transportation, waste reduction, and better solutions to address crystal meth.

“We need innovative ideas, rooted in our historical and cultural knowledge, to ensure that our economy is delivering a high quality of life and not compromising the things we value. We need to bring tourism and development into alignment with the values and priorities of residents, ensuring that tourism serves Kauai instead of Kauai serving tourism.”

For Barca, this means moving towards greater economic self-reliance and regenerative agriculture especially; addressing land-use policies that have driven kama`aina families from their homes and blocked local access to important cultural and recreational areas; and developing new policies that limit growth while ensuring that dollars spent locally benefit local families. Barca emphasizes that the true wealth of Kaua’i lies in our water, land and people and that we are stewards of this `aina for many generations to come.

As a fundraiser and to bring awareness to his campaign, Barca will paddle from Kee to Polihale and then run around the island, from Polihale to Ke`e, from May 29 - June 1. He will stop along the way to pay tribute to some of our most historically significant areas, talk-story with community members and find out more about their concerns and visions for Kaua‘i. After completing his journey, a pa`ina will be held on Sunday, June 1, from 2-8pm in Hanalei.

More information on Dustin Barca’s historical run as well as his platform can be found online at www.Barca4Mayor.com


.

TGI as apologists' highway

SUBHEAD: TGI is heavily influenced by the corporations, organizations and individuals doing Kauai the most harm.

By Juan Wilson on 2 February 2014 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2014/02/tgi-as-apologists-highway.html)


Image above: Typical fluff. Front page TGI photo by Dennis Fujimoto on 2/2/14.  Halea Bactad and Jessica Kaleiohi, react to the ice water during the polar plunge Saturday at Kapaa Beach Park. From (http://thegardenisland.com/news/local/plunging-for-a-good-cause/article_0e0ca90e-8bd6-11e3-86bf-001a4bcf887a.html).

This Sunday the only newspaper on Kauai, the Garden Island News has an unusually heavy number of of neer-do-wells and P.R. flaks pimping for organizations that are under pressure from island residents.

Number 1:
Front page banner headline
Atrazine Hazard Use Down

THE GIST: Don't worry. Even though Syngenta manufactures Atrazine and uses it and many more restricted use pesticides in GMO plant experiments near Kauai neighborhoods you don't have to be concerned because that's just a bad memory fading in the rear view mirror. You should trust our government's regulating efforts and the corporations providing the few jobs left on Kauai.



Atrazine Hazard Use Down
Report shines light on statewide use of chemical herbicide
By Chis D'Angelo on 2 February 2014 for TGI  (http://thegardenisland.com/news/local/atrazine-hazard-use-down/article_44c742c0-8bd5-11e3-b454-001a4bcf887a.html)

Over the last seven decades, the use of atrazine in Hawaii has declined significantly, from about 400,000 pounds in 1964 to 77,403 pounds in 2012, according to a recent study by the state Department of Health. And much of that drop is the result of the state’s dying sugar industry.

For anyone concerned about atrazine and its potential health and environmental impacts, DOH supervisor Fenix Grange said the report should be “extraordinarily comforting.” “The hazard is going down, not going up,” she said. “But to be sure, we’re going out and collecting samples.”

The legislative report — as well as the DOH’s current sampling effort — is the fruit of House Concurrent Resolution 129.

Adopted in April, it called for the DOH to head up a task force to address the potential data gaps on air, surface water and near-shore effects of the chemical herbicide.

“Last spring they asked for an atrazine study, because atrazine was kind of the flavor of the month,” said Grange, who prepared the report along with DOH toxicologist Barbara Brooks.

The report, completed in November and recently posted online, found that the sugar industry “was and is the largest user of atrazine in Hawaii.”

“The drop in atrazine usage over time reflects the decline of sugarcane cultivation, cancellation of some uses and more restrictive label application rates,” according to the report.

HCR 129 states “it is in the best interest of the state to be at the forefront of a monitoring and regulatory effort to protect Hawaii residents from the potential adverse effects of chronic atrazine exposure.”

Grange said the 63-page report is the first of its kind, a compilation of historical atrazine use data throughout the state. Manufactured by Syngenta,
Atrazine is a pre- or post-emergence herbicide used for weed control. Registered in the U.S. since 1958, it is one of the most widely used herbicides, with 76.5 million pounds of the active ingredient used domestically each year...
Click here for more.




Number 2:
Front page above the fold story
Mayor - Attacks are politically motivated

THE GIST: It must be getting hotter in Mayor Bernard P. Carvalho's inner sanctum to have  a heavy hitting Honolulu attorney respond to recent actions by Kauai residents to have the mayor step down for inappropriate use of a county credit card for personal gain and refusal to testify and so violating Hawaii Statute 78-9. See GasGate article here.


Mayor - Attacks are politically motivated
Carvalho’s attorney responds to public criticism
By Darin Moriki on 2 February 2014 for TGI  (http://thegardenisland.com/news/local/mayor-attacks-are-politically-motivated/article_b63ef294-8bd6-11e3-9289-001a4bcf887a.html)

Kauai Mayor Bernard Carvalho Jr. is dismissing claims that he violated state law during a county audit investigation that began four years ago.

The two-term mayor issued a statement on Saturday through his Honolulu-based attorney in response to public claims that he had violated the law.

The allegations, released in emails to county officials, state lawmakers and several media outlets over the past two weeks, called on Carvalho to step down because he did not cooperate with a criminal investigation stemming from an audit of county fuel charges.
“This is old news and curiously comes at a time when the mayor is ramping up a re-election campaign,” Carvalho’s personal attorney Eric Seitz said in the statement. “These allegations are without merit and an examination of the facts will show the mayor has done nothing wrong.”
The audit, published by County Auditor Ernesto “Ernie” Pasion in April 2012, implied that Carvalho and other county employees illegally used county fuel for personal use.
A subsequent review of the allegations by the attorney general’s office found no basis for further criminal investigation.
Because Carvalho invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refused to answer questions during the investigation, several residents, including Glenn Mickens, Ken Taylor, Michael Sheehan, and Sheehan’s attorney Richard E. Wilson, said state laws specifically call for Carvalho to vacate office.
“Your tenure as mayor has ended,” Wilson wrote in a Jan. 30 letter addressed to Carvalho.
Click here for more. 



Number 3:

Editorial Page Guest Commentary
KIUC top goal remains reducing bills

THE GIST: It's funny that if that is the goal of KIUC for the last decade in that we still have the most expensive electricity in the country. Maybe it's partially because of the over generous perks to the KIUC executive elite. Maybe it's because its the board's refusal to face a future of less consumption and centralization of electrical power generation. Maybe it's because KIUC is not really a cooperative at all, but just another corporation bleeding its customers.


 KIUC top goal remains reducing bills
By KIUC Chair Allan Smith on 2 February 2014 in TGI
Now that the special election on meter fees is concluded, I want to thank the 43 percent of our members who took the time to learn about the issue and to vote.

We're especially grateful to the 74 percent who voted "yes" and supported the decision of their elected board.

I want to make some observations about our member-owned cooperative, about our obligations as directors and about the realities of running a public utility.

As an elected director, I have the fiduciary duty to represent the interests of all members of KIUC.

This includes our industrial and commercial members who represent 60 percent of our revenue as well as our 25,000 residential customers. As a lifelong resident of Kauai, I take my responsibilities seriously, especially when considering how the actions I take today will affect future generations.

Over the course of this election, I've heard some people talk about "making the cooperative act like a cooperative." The way they would accomplish this is to increase the influence of a tiny minority of the members and put operational decisions of the utility up for a popular vote.

Cooperative and democratic principles are not based on the tyranny of the minority, but rather on representing the views of the majority. As for running the utility, I'm confident that the great majority would prefer to leave that to the professional staff and elected board.

As chairman of KIUC's board, I only am one vote of nine. Every action we take must receive the support of a majority of the directors. This is how a cooperative works. This is how democracy works. We must be able to compromise, we *must accept that we do not always get our way and, win or lose, we must move on to address the next issue.

Once the board makes a decision, we have the fiduciary duty to advocate for that decision and explain to members why they should support it. Yet this is seen by some as violating the principles

of the cooperative. To me, it would not only break our commitments as directors but would go against common sense to remain silent on a challenge to one of our decisions.

In the event of future petitions, we will continue to educate our members on why the decision was made and what's at stake for the cooperative. We will ask for their vote to support the elected directors' decisions.

I am increasingly concerned by the process that allows 250 people to sign a petition - less than 1 percent of our membership - to challenge actions taken by the board. Particularly when a repeat petition challenger told The Garden Island that he "was more excited about the high voter turnout than disappointed about the results ... that's good for democracy ... I'm glad that we had the conversation."

It was not a conversation, it was a confrontation,  one that cost the membership well over $100,000 in direct expenses and staff time.

While the petitioners may look upon this as some sort of academic exercise, a challenge to a board action is a very serious matter. We do not take it lightly. And now, for the second time in three years, nearly three-quarters of the members who voted in a petition election defeated a challenge of a board action.

While the petitioner believes the high turnout was "good for democracy," he shouldn't tryto spin the outcome as a win. I took it as a sign that many of our members are fed up.

This was a direct rebuke from the vast majority of members who are tired of seeing their cooperative's time and resources diverted from the No. I goal in our strategic plan: cutting their electric bill.

Now we have another vote coming up. The ballots will be arriving soon for the 2014 board of directors election. I hope our members will remain engaged and will vote after studying the backgrounds and positions of the 11 candidates.

As directors, our job is to make choices. Some choices are more popular than others. But we make these choices in a thoughtful, responsible manner and in the best interests of our members and Kauai.
IB note: This article was not online at time of this publication.




CONCLUSION
My take on these three TGI articles is an increasing distrust of having no paper of record actually published on Kauai. The news (and the lawyering) is coming from Oahu and beyond. This stuff is a lot of mushy mealy public relations sprinkled with sugar (or more likely HFCS).

I praise the individual letters to the editor and the efforts of some of our on islands reporters, but TGI is heavily influenced by the corporations, organizations and individuals doing Kauai the most harm.

The real issues are related to Conservation, Decentralization and Rehumanization. See more Ea O Ka Aina: A Bargain with the Archdruid.
.

Mayor Carvalho and Gasgate

SUBHEAD: Did the Mayor violate the law using a county credit card? Did he disqualify himself from office by refusing to incriminate himself?

By Ken Taylor on 1 February 2014 in Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2014/02/mayor-carvalho-and-gasgate.html)

[IB Publisher's note: The following is a compilation of a few emails recently submitted to us by Ken Taylor involving the controversy over an investigation of Kauai Mayor Carvalho in the possible misuse of a county gas credit card.]


Image above: A gift card for Shell gasoline. From (http://shellvzine.com/vpower/15/53).

Glenn Mickens and I read comments found on pages 7, 8, and 9 of this complaint in regard to a County Fuel Audit that indicated a high elected Kauai official was using a County gas credit card for personal vehicle use. Among other things the complaint said:
27. The Staff Aufitor's review revealed. among other things, that a certain high elected Official ("Official A") used a County gas card assigned to a seldom-used Transportation Agency vehicle to purchase fas for Official A's private vehicle. This meant that Official A was using the County resources and taxpayer's monies for what appeared to be a personal purpose.
There was concern that Official A's conduct was a violation of law.

See PDF here (http://www.islandbreath.org/2014Year/02/140201complaint.pdf).

Based on that document Glenn Mickens and I, Ken Taylor, analyzed Hawaii statute 78-9:


 78-9 : Hawaii Statutes - Section 78-9: Failure to appear or testify, termination of employment.
Search Haw. Rev. Stat. § 78-9 : Hawaii Statutes - Section 78-9: Failure to appear or testify, termination of employment.
·         Search by Keyword or Citation

 If any person subject to sections 78-8 to 78-11, after lawful notice or process, wilfully refuses or fails to appear before any court or judge, any legislative committee, or any officer, board, or commission, or having appeared refuses to testify or to answer any question regarding -
(1) the government, property or affairs of the State or of any political subdivision thereof, or

(2) the person's qualifications for public office or employment, or

(3) the qualifications of any officer or employee of the State or any political subdivision thereof, on the ground that the person's answer would tend to incriminate the person, or refuses to testify or to answer any such question without right,
- the person's term or tenure of office or employment shall terminate and the office or employment shall be vacant, and the person shall not be eligible to election or appointment to any office or employment under the State or any political subdivision thereof.

To the extent that the State is without authority to require, under the constitution or laws of the United States, compliance by any public officer or public employee herewith, sections 78-8 to 78-11 shall not apply to the officer or employee, but the sections shall apply to the extent that they or any part thereof can lawfully be made applicable.

[L 1951, c 177, §2; RL 1955, §5-4; HRS §78-9; gen ch 1985; am L 2001, c 83, §3]


See more at: (http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/histatutes/1/7/78/78-9#sthash.PJ2VowCE.dpuf)

Glenn Mickens and and I subsequently wrote a letter to Kauai Mayor Bernard Carvalho that read as followes:


TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR BERNARD CARVALHO
4444 RICE ST. STE
LIHUE, HI 96766

ALOHA MAYOR CARVALHO:

Section 78-9 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes provides that if after lawful notice or process an official appears before a court or an administrative body and fails to answer any question regarding government property or affairs of the State or any political subdivision on the grounds that the person's answer would tend to incriminate the person, the person's tenure in office shall terminate and the office or employment shall be vacant. It seems evident that our state intended that a county or state employee could invoke the privilege contained in our Federal constitution on a work related matter to seek to avoid criminal conviction but that such such invocation would result in termination of the employee's position.

We are informed that after having been duly served you appeared pursuant to an investigation being made related to a Fuel Audit conducted by the Kauai County Auditor and on that occasion you refused to answer inquiry as to your conduct on the grounds that the answer would tend to incriminate you and that at such appearance you were represented by Mr. Alfred Castillo, Kauai County Attorney.

If the information mentioned is inaccurate in any material respect or if you believe that the statute is inapplicable to your conduct, we are asking for your statement as to the reasons for your belief. Otherwise we will expect that you take action to comply with the provisions of HRS Section 78-9 in order that the Council may proceed in accordance with the terms of the Kauai County Charter to fill the vacancy in the mayoral office.

A prompt response to this letter is requested.

Respectfully yours,

_________________________
Glenn Mickens

_________________________
Ken Taylor


We did receive a reply to our letter from the Office of the Mayor which was as follows (http://www.islandbreath.org/2014Year/02/140201response.pdf):


From THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
County of Kaua‘i, State of Hawai‘i
4444 Rice Street, Suite 235, Līhu‘e, Hawai‘i 96766
TEL (808) 241-4900    FAX (808) 241-6877
Bernard P. Carvalho Jr.
Mayor
Nadine K. Nakamura
Managing Director

Via Email: taylork021@hawaii.rr.com; glennruth2030@gmail.com
January 16, 2014
Mr. Glenn Mickens Mr. Ken Taylor
Dear Glenn and Ken:
Mahalo for your letter dated January 14, 2014, regarding Section 78-9 of the Hawai‘i Revised Statutes.
Please be advised the matter in question is being researched. We will respond to your questions once the research has been concluded.
Best regards,
Beth Tokioka Director of Communications
C:    Bernard P. Carvalho, Jr., Mayor


Since then Michael Sheehan has responded to these events by requesting his lawyer, Richard E. Wilson, to write a letter to Mayor Carvalho. See (http://www.islandbreath.org/2014Year/02/140201formermayor.pdf):


From the Law Offices of Richard E. Wilson, LLC
850 Richards Street, Ste. 600 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Telephone: (808) 545-1311 Facsimile:  (808) 545-1388
February 1, 2014
Former Mayor Bernard Carvalho
County of Kauai
4444 Rice Street, Ste. 235
Lihue, Hawaii 96766

Re: Haw.Rev.Stat. §78-9

Dear Former Mayor Carvalho:

I correspond on behalf of my client, Michael G. Sheehan, a landowner and resident of Kauai.  Mr. Sheehan is very concerned about your actions and asked me to pen this letter.

It is Mr. Sheehan’s understanding that in your capacity as Mayor of Kauai, you refused, following lawful notice, to answer questions asked of you regarding the “property and/or affairs” of the County of Kauai on the ground that your answer would tend to incriminate you.  More specifically, you refused on the advice of counsel to answer questions in connection with an investigation undertaken by the County Auditor regarding the Fuel Audit (“gas card scandal”).  Pursuant to Haw.Rev.Stat. §78-9, you are no longer the Mayor of Kauai.

Haw.Rev.Stat. §78-9 states as follows:
If any person subject to sections 78-8 to 78-11, after lawful notice or process, wilfully refuses or fails to appear before any court or judge, any legislative committee, or any officer, board, or commission, or having appeared refuses to testify or to answer any question regarding (1) the government, property or affairs of the State or of any political subdivision thereof, or (2) the person's qualifications for public office or employment, or (3) the qualifications of any officer or employee of the State or any political subdivision thereof, on the ground that the person’s answer would tend to incriminate the person, or refuses to testify or to answer any such question without right, the person’s term or tenure of office or employment shall terminate and the office or employment shall be vacant, and the person shall not be eligible to election or appointment to any office or employment under the State or any political subdivision thereof.  To the extent that the State is without authority to require, under the constitution or laws of the United States, compliance by any public officer or public employee herewith, sections 78-8 to 78-11 shall not apply to the officer or employee, but the sections shall apply to the extent that they or any part thereof can lawfully be made applicable.
As Mayor at the time, you were a person subject to sections 78-8 to 78-11.  See, §78-8 (The persons subject to sections 78-8 to 78-11 are those elected to or appointed or employed in the government of the State or any county, or in any political subdivision thereof, or appointed to or employed in any office or employment any part of the compensation of which is paid out of public funds.)(emphasis added).

The procedure for your removal is as follows:
If any person subject to sections 78-8 to 78-11 refuses to appear or refuses to testify under any of the circumstances contemplated in section 78-9, the presiding judge or officer of the court or body before which the default or refusal occurs shall certify the fact thereof to the appointing or employing authority having cognizance of the person as a public officer or public employee and to the comptroller or other disbursing officer who issues warrants or checks to pay the person for the person’s services as a public officer or public employee.  If the default or refusal occurs before any court or body whose presiding judge or officer may not be required by the legislature to make and file such a certificate, then (1) the presiding judge or officer may make and file the certificate, and (2) the attorney general of the State, upon learning of the default or refusal, shall make and file the certificate if the presiding judge or officer of the court or body has not filed the same.  Upon receiving a certificate, (A) the appointing or employing authority  shall remove or discharge the person from office or employment, and (B) the comptroller or other disbursing officer shall make no further payments of public funds to the person, except to pay the person the salary, wages, bonus, or other compensation to which the person otherwise would be entitled if the person were voluntarily terminating the person’s office or employment on the day the order is served on the comptroller or other disbursing officer.  - Section 78-10.
Your tenure as Mayor has ended.

Mr. Sheehan’s sole question is how do you intend to proceed?

You can acknowledge that you are no longer the Mayor of Kauai pursuant to §78-9, and so advise the Council.  That would be Mr. Sheehan’s preferred avenue.  At least you would be able to control the news release and leave 4444 Rice Street on your own terms. 

The alternative is for Mr. Sheehan to obtain the relevant transcript, provide it to the Attorney General and then demand your removal in compliance with §78-10.  If you choose the latter, you will have no control over the situation and it will be a media circus.  Mr. Sheehan would, of course, advise the media that you refused to voluntarily leave which required him to seek your removal.  The choice is yours.

If we do not hear from you by the close of business, February 5, 2014, we will proceed accordingly, and without further notice to you.

Very truly yours,
Richard E. Wilson
REW/asa
cc:    Michael G. Sheehan

.

GMO companies threat to democracy

SOURCE: Ken Taylor (taylork021@hawaii.rr.com)
SUBHEAD: GMOs attempt with Hawaii Governor, Agriculture Department, and Kauai Mayor to derail democracy on Kauai.

Via Andrea Brower on 19 December 2013 in Island Breath - 
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2013/12/gmo-companies-threat-to-democracy.html)


Image above: Governor Abercrombie and Mayor Carvalho holding hands with friends. From (http://thegardenisland.com/news/local/kaua-i-captured-for-saturday-december/article_b9761f26-3b6b-11e2-8cae-001a4bcf887a.html?mode=jqm_gal).

This week, the Government Accountability Project (GAP), a nonprofit, nonpartisan public interest group based in Washington, D.C., submitted several information requests to Hawaii state and county officials about meetings and communications with large biotech companies during the debate over Kauai’s pesticide and disclosure legislation, Bill 2491.

The bill, now signed into law as “Ordinance 960”, requires biotech companies to disclose pesticide use information and establish buffer zones between their fields and schools, hospitals and residential areas.

Pursuant to the Hawaii Uniform Information Practices Act, GAP has requested information about meetings and communications between the Governor’s Office, the Hawaii Department of Agriculture, and the Kauai County Mayor’s Office and any representatives of Dow AgroSciences, Pioneer Hi-Bred, Syngenta, BASF, and the biotech trade group “Hawaii Crop Improvement Association.” The requests focus on communications concerning pesticide use and Bill 2491/Ordinance 960.

Amanda Hitt, GAP’s Food Integrity Campaign Director, stated:
“We knew we had to get involved. We filed these requests after being contacted by several Hawaii residents concerned about what seemed to be attempts by the biotech industry to derail local legislative efforts through closed-door strategizing with state and county officials. This is nothing short of a corporate hijacking of the democratic process.”

GAP’s mission is “to protect the public interest by promoting government and corporate accountability.”

From 2010-2012, Dow, Syngenta, BASF and Pioneer have collectively applied over 98% of the total Restricted Use Pesticides used in the agricultural sector on Kauai. Actions by the Governor’s office and the Hawaii Department of Agriculture during the debate over Kauai County Council Bill 2491 left both bill-supporters and council-members questioning what appeared to be an agenda to block County progress.

On the eve of key county council votes, the State issued announcements regarding a voluntary pesticide disclosure and buffer zone program, which many interpreted as an attempt to derail regulatory action.

The administration under Governor Abercrombie has come under increasing scrutiny for its ties to the industry, and its disregard for the concerns of residents impacted by biotech operations, as well as the medical and environmental communities. In 2013, there were moves made by the industry, with the support of State Departments and law-makers, to eliminate the counties’ rights to protect the health and well-being of their people.

The trend towards institutionalizing the rights of corporations over the rights of people is one that Hawaii’s citizens are becoming increasingly concerned about. As the 2014 State legislative session nears, residents around Hawaii are preparing to focus their attention on any attempts by the biotech industry to strip County and State regulatory oversight.

Fern Rosenstiel of ‘Ohana o Kauai said, “It’s important for Hawaii’s elected officials to know that attempts to undermine the peoples’ desire for transparency, democracy and protection of people and land will not be tolerated.

The people of Hawaii are moving forward together to show that agreements made between multi-national corporations and our government behind closed doors are not the way of our future. And we are very grateful to GAP as an ally in this.”

Contact:
Amanda Hitt
Government Accountability Project

Email:
amandah@whistleblower.org

See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: Kauai Mayor vetoes GMO Bill 10/31/13
Ea O Ka Aina: GMO companies play the government 10/15/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Abercrombie a GMO tool 9/23/13


 

.

Kenoi signs GMO Bill

SUBHEAD: Big Island Mayor Billy Kenoi signed GMO restriction Bill 113 into law.

By Tom Callis on 5 December 2013 for Hawaii Tribune -
(http://hawaiitribune-herald.com/sections/news/local-news/kenoi-signs-gmo-bill.html)


Image above: Video Still of Big Island Mayor Billy Kenoi. From (https://vimeo.com/51727652).

Mayor Billy Kenoi signed Bill 113 into law today, his office announced.

The bill restricts the use of genetically modified crops on the Big Island by banning their open-air use and testing.

Existing growers of transgenic crops are exempted but must sign up with a registry.

The bill goes into effect immediately.

Below is the statement Kenoi provided to the County Council.
Aloha, Chair Yoshimoto and Members:

On Nov. 19, 2013 the Hawai‘i County Council adopted Bill 113 Draft 3 adding a new article relating to Genetically Engineered Crops and Plants, and on Nov. 21, 2013 delivered the bill to me for my consideration. After careful deliberation and discussions with members of my administration and the public, I am signing Bill 113.

Our community has a deep connection and respect for our land, and we all understand we must protect our island and preserve our precious natural resources. We are determined to do what is right for the land because this place is unlike any other in the world. With this new ordinance we are conveying that instead of global agribusiness corporations, we want to encourage and support community-based farming and ranching.

The debate over this bill has at times been divisive and hurtful, and some of our hard-working farmers who produce food for our community have been treated disrespectfully. 
We are determined to protect every farmer and rancher. Agriculture on Hawai‘i Island will continue to grow with county assistance, investment and support. That commitment includes initiatives such as the public-private partnership to improve and expand the Pa‘auilo Slaughterhouse to support our grass-fed beef industry, and the launch of the Kapulena Agricultural Park, the largest agricultural park in the state on 1,739 acres of county-owned land. 
It also includes support for innovative training programs to grow the farmers of the future, and to train veterans to engage in agriculture on Hawaiian Home Lands, and the introduction and advancement of Korean Natural Farming as a sustainable method of producing healthier crops and livestock. It includes completion of the first-in-the-state Food Self-Sufficiency Baseline Study of Hawai‘i Island to measure the island’s progress toward food self-sufficiency.

We are determined to reunite our farming community to create a stronger and more vibrant agricultural sector. It is time to end the angry rhetoric and reach out to our neighbors. Our farmers are essential to creating a wholesome and sustainable food supply on this island, and they deserve to be treated with respect and aloha. We must turn now to a meaningful, factual dialogue with one another.

With my approval of this bill, our administration will launch a year of research and data collection to investigate factual claims and to seek out new directions that farming in our community should take. 
This work will include an expanded database detailing the locations of both organic and conventional farms, the crops that are grown, more accurate estimates of the revenue earned from these enterprises, and the challenges our farmers face in meeting food safety and organic certification requirements. 
We will work with our farmers and our ranchers to carefully monitor the impacts of this bill over the next year to separate speculation and guesswork from the facts.

Today our communities expect that government will be as cautious as possible in protecting our food and water supplies. We all want to minimize impacts to the environment while also producing abundant, affordable food for local consumption. 
This ordinance expresses the desires and demands of our community for a safe, sustainable agricultural sector that can help feed our people while keeping our precious island productive and healthy.

.

Kauai Mayor faces GMO fallout

SOURCE: Brad Parsons (mauibrad@hotmail.com)
SUBHEAD: For Hawaii politicians, like Kauai Mayor Bernard Carvalho, GMO-Biotech legislation is political Kryptonite.

By Sophie Cocke on 22 November 2013 for Civil Beat -
(http://www.civilbeat.com/articles/2013/11/25/20485-will-kauais-mayor-face-fallout-after-gmo-pesticide-battles/)


Image above: Mayor BErnard Carvalho in his office. From origibnal article.

Bernard Carvalho, a 6-foot-6 former Miami Dolphins football player, likes to give hugs.

It's a challenge for most recipients to fit their arms around the gregarious mayor's bear-like frame, but he's enjoyed welcoming political embraces. Carvalho's warmth and easy charisma facilitated his re-election in 2010 when he won over 77 percent of voters on the island.

But since he vetoed GMO and pesticide disclosure Bill 2491 in October, some reactions haven't been very affectionate.

He’s been jeered in public and anti-GMO activist groups have vowed to destroy his political career. Carvalho has received phone calls and emails from people threatening to damage his property and hurt him. He's been described as a "scumbag," a "chemical company thug," and a "birth-defects mayor."

Anger toward Carvalho took a sharp turn on October 31 when he vetoed the Kauai County Council's bill that requires biotech companies on the island to disclose details about their pesticide use and abide by setbacks between test fields sprayed with chemicals and schools, hospitals, parks and waterways. The bill also requires farmers to disclose their GMO use or risk fines and jail time.

The council overrode the mayor's veto on Nov. 16 so the measure is slated to go into effect in August of 2014.

A mayor with a hearty laugh who often uses football metaphors to describes politics might seem out of place in the debate over biotech.

When he sat down recently with Civil Beat on one of his over-sized office chairs, he highlighted what he sees as progress in getting biotech companies to engage with local residents and the political process. Or, as Carvalho puts it, he finally got them “off the bench.”

“I told the companies, in a football game … either you’re sitting on the bench drinking water or you are in the game helping this thing move along to get to a win-win,” he said.

The solution, Carvalho believes, is for everyone to work together on the issue, including the governor, state departments tasked with oversight of pesticides and GMOs and the biotech companies.

Local Boy
Carvalho, 52, was born and raised on Kauai. He attended Kapaa High School where he was a football and basketball star, before enrolling at the University of Hawaii at Manoa on a football scholarship. He was drafted by the Dolphins in 1984 and played two seasons before getting married and returning to Kauai, where he is a father of three children.

He worked his way up through the ranks of local government and, after the death of then-Mayor Bryan Baptiste, won a special election for mayor in 2008. Two years later, he won an overwhelming victory.

The mayor, who plans to run for re-election in 2014, speaks with a heavy local accent that is laced with the cadence of Hawaiian Pidgin. His roots run deep on Kauai, where his father and grandparents used to work the sugarcane and pineapple fields.

His family history helps to explain his loyalty to, and sympathy for, the agriculture workers who work in the fields for biotech companies where genetically engineered crops, primarily seed corn, are tested before being exported to the mainland.

He suggested that their fate is a driving motivation for him when he deals with the biotech industry.

“There’s families that work the field like my grandma and grandpa used to work before. So I’m concerned about that. To say that [residents] are just going to get rid of all these companies, no way. We are going to work together,” Carvalho said.

“Nobody can tell me, ‘No worry, they going to get a job,’” he continued. “No, no, no. I know (people) with tears falling down their eyes, they are very concerned. Because that is all they have, these families.”

Carvalho said he is torn between the concerns of workers and of residents scared of the restricted chemicals that biotech companies spray on fields — substances that may enter the surrounding environment via the soil, water and air.

His response has been all about trying to get key players to work together on the issue — the governor, state departments tasked with pesticide and GMO oversight and the biotech companies.

The attempt at balance strikes some council members and bill supporters as naive. A common refrain of their criticism is: “You don’t negotiate with multi-billion dollar corporations.”

Councilman Gary Hooser, who co-introduced Bill 2491 with Tim Bynum, said repeated attempts to work with these companies in the past went nowhere. “I think (the mayor) is genuine, but not as informed on the issue and (he) gives a greater weight to the industry perspective,” Hooser said. “I think that he is overly optimistic in his expectations that these large corporations will act like good neighbors.”

Hooser’s comments about Carvalho are gentle compared to others on social media.

“Enjoy your last days in office chemical Carvalho, we will make an example of you,” the Hawaii GMO Justice Coalition wrote on its Facebook page shortly after the mayor’s veto. ”You have stained our lives and our health, we will stain your political future.”

That post received 141 “likes,” 66 comments and was shared 30 times.

“Go to hell Carvalho!” wrote one commenter.

“Vote him out. Scum bag,” wrote another.

The Hawaii GMO Justice Coalition later deemed Carvalho a “chemical company thug,” which also went over well with the group’s Facebook fans.

The unconventional advocacy group Babes Against Biotech, which has emerged in recent years as a highly visible presence in Hawaii’s anti-GMO movement, nicknamed him “the birth-defects mayor.” The group’s organizers — young women known for their bikini-clad pictures and pin-up calendar — plans to canvass on Kauai to secure Carvalho's electoral defeat in 2014. (The group claims to have 9,000 members.)

But it is far from clear that those who called Carvalho names and who have promised to end his political career will be detrimental to his 2014 re-election effort.

For one, the Kauai County Council’s override of Carvalho's veto may soften anger toward the mayor because he lost on the issue.
GMO Politics
Given an absence of substantive public polling, it remains unclear how many people on the island actually respect or support Carvalho's decision, or support Bill 2491.

So, despite a rally by at least 1,500 people to encourage passage of the bill in September, no one knows for sure where a majority of Kauai's 65,000 residents stand.

“One of the things that is really interesting about this entire process has been that you have a very active group of people who have dominated the conversation,” said Jan TenBruggencate, a former Honolulu Advertiser reporter who runs a communications consulting firm and is a member of the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative.

“There are people who are supporting the bill, when you talk to them privately, they still feel genetic modification of crops has the potential to feed the world and should go forward,” said TenBruggencate. “So it is sufficiently nuanced in the minds of the people that it is really hard to know what will happen at the ballot box.”

TenBruggencate even suggested that there may be a silent majority against the bill. "So I have heard people surmise that some of the supporters of the measure on the council could actually lose votes. And that the support for the bill is relatively thin.”

The debate on Kauai has often been boiled down to a David-versus-Goliath fight, with local residents concerned about health and the environment going up against the world’s biotech giants — Syngenta, DuPont-Pioneer, Dow and BASF.

But the political contours of the debate are more nuanced. The fight over Bill 2491 has attracted anti-GMO activists who want the biotech industry driven off of Kauai. Their arguments mirror those of a broader national movement that decries genetically engineered food as unnatural and dangerous, and feeds off public distrust and resentment toward multinational corporations.

In the face of such arguments, Carvalho stands by his strategy of outreach to all, which he says is in the best interests of the island. “Kauai is a special place and we have a special way of doing business,” the mayor said. “We work together. And if that means going to some place in Indiana or Iowa (where the biotech companies’ headquarters are) and going through every floor and spreading aloha in that place, I’ll do that if I have to.”

How Carvalho’s efforts will resonate with voters next November may well be influenced by how events unfold in the courtroom and the Legislature.

The biotech industry has said it will sue the county over the new law. Additional legislation may also be proposed at the state level to limit the county’s ability to impose regulations on biotech companies.

Joan Conrow, a longtime Kauai resident and reporter, said reactions to any forthcoming legal and legislative steps could measure residents' temperature on the issue. And if the courts or Legislature alter the equation on the issue, it could affect how people vote.

Regardless, all of Kauai will be able to decide how it feels about Carvalho on Nov. 4, 2014.

.