Showing posts with label Morality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Morality. Show all posts

In the Face of Extinction

SUBHEAD: We must use our time wisely in the most monumental test our species has faced.

By Dahr Jamail on 3 December 2018 for Truth Out -
(https://truthout.org/articles/in-the-face-of-extinction-we-have-a-moral-obligation/)


Image above: People watch a globe at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21), in Le Bourget, France, on December 10, 2015. Photo by Miguel Medina. From original article.

[IB Publisher's note: We have not published an article for almost a month. There are several reasons. One is the sense of futility of changing the course of much else than our own behavior. Another is the long list of new projects, and the repair and maintenance of existing ones. As we move from dependence to self reliance more time is needed to live life rather than comment on it. Hunker down in place and take care of family. It's going to be a bumpy ride.] 

Researching and writing about the impacts of runaway climate change, as I’ve been doing now for too many years, I’ve watched several patterns recur.

One of these is evident in a recent warning from the UN. Biodiversity chief of the UN Cristiana PaČ™ca Palmer warned that if governments around the globe don’t work to bring a halt to the loss of biodiversity and succeed in implementing a plan to do so within two years, humans could face our own extinction.

Palmer said, according to The Guardian, “People in all countries need to put pressure on their governments to draw up ambitious global targets by 2020 to protect the insects, birds, plants and mammals that are vital for global food production, clean water and carbon sequestration.”

People in all countries are already working to pressure their governments to do just that. Yet, with few possible exceptions, we know all too well how wedded most governments are to the current power structure and the economics that drive it to believe radical policy change like this will actually occur (without overthrowing said governments).

Then the pattern will repeat: After some time passes, and things are even worse, another dire warning or results of a study that serves as one is released, and again, nothing will change.

As cynical as this is, anyone paying attention over time can see this pattern.

Thus, we shall continue to watch these milestones as they pass by, then brace ourselves for what is to come.

Personally, I have instead surrendered and accepted the inevitability of our situation: that we will live the rest of our time, however long each of us might have left, on an irrevocably changed planet, while the Sixth Mass Extinction event continues apace. We will daily walk further into that frontier.

However, for me, this means that caring for the small piece of land where I live has never been more meaningful. Never have I felt as much gratitude for birdsong when I hear it, or for the scent of the Douglas fir near my home, or for the fresh air wafting down from the Olympic Mountains within whose shadow I live.

At the same time, never have I felt as morally obliged as I do today to live my life as close to my beliefs as possible. I’m obliged to work to serve and care for the planet with as much assiduity, tenacity and devotion as I am capable of. In fact, each time I read about the dire results of yet another human-caused climate/bio/geosphere disruption study, it is an opportunity to recommit to my beliefs.

At least for today, this is how I do this work in a way that is personally sustainable. Tomorrow, assuming I am still here, I might need a completely different approach.

If you haven’t yet, I encourage you to consider what your approach could be, as you take in each one of these reports below — each one a body blow humans have inflicted upon Earth.

To begin, a recently published study has shown that ocean acidification has already ignited a dangerous feedback loop that is literally dissolving the seafloor. Motherboard’s explanation of the study is worth quoting in full, as this is a critical feedback loop we all must be aware of:

Calcium carbonate, or calcite, lines the ocean floor. When calcite combines with carbon dioxide and water, the reaction produces calcium ions and bicarbonate ions. Because of this, the surrounding water becomes less acidic over long periods of time — think tens to thousands of years.

But when you throw more carbon dioxide into the equation, all of the seafloor calcite starts to get used up to power these reactions in extremely large amounts, meaning that the ocean floor is dissolving. Now, there’s not enough calcite but more carbon dioxide than ever, driving up acidity levels.

Foundational species in the marine food chain, such as coral, are fine-tuned to thrive within a very particular range of pH levels. When those levels change for a long period of time, these species — as well as the fish, bacteria, mollusks, and ocean life that depends on them — simply can’t survive. The last time the oceans were as acidic as they are now, 96 percent of ocean life was extinct.

Another study published in mid-November revealed how the climate policies of China, Russia and Canada alone will, if left unchanged, bring Earth above catastrophic 5 degrees Celsius (5°C) warming in less than 85 years.

The recently released US National Climate Assessment stated unequivocally that human-caused climate change will inflict “substantial damages” to the “economy, environment, and human health over the coming decades.”

In many ways it restates the obvious: Climate change is already harming the lives of people in the US via disastrous wildfires in the west, soil loss in the Midwest, coastal erosion in Alaska, and east coast flooding. As did the aforementioned study, a previous climate assessment chapter stated: “without major reductions, annual average global temperatures could increase by 9°F (5°C) or more by the end of this century.”

Earth

Climate change-driven changes across this realm are becoming more dramatic with each passing month.

A recently published study showed that, due to increasingly warmer temperatures, climate change has become an “escalator to extinction” for mountain birds. Warmer temperatures are wiping out bird species that were already living atop mountains for the cooler climate.

Another recent study showed that climate change is essentially functioning to sterilize male insects. This grave damage to male insect reproductive systems under increasingly powerful heat waves could already be contributing to declines in biodiversity around much of the world.

Habitat loss for wildlife, according to a recent UN conference, is a threat to all of our futures. Biodiversity experts in attendance warned that the mass extinction of the planet’s wildlife is now as big of a danger as climate change itself. The World Wildlife Fund recently published its annual Living Planet report, which showed how, since just 1970, humans have annihilated 60 percent of Earth’s mammals, birds, fish and reptiles.

A very important recently published article by Yale Environment 360 showed how Earth’s climate zones are literally shifting due to climate change. This is bringing about food and water scarcity, and resulting in mostly negative consequences for local economies and public health.

Some of the highlights of the article: The tropics are expanding by 30 miles each decade, the Sahara Desert has gotten 10 percent larger since 1920, and the 100th meridian in the US — the line where the arid Western plains of North America meet the wetter eastern region — has shifted 140 miles to the east.

On that note, a government scientist in Canada is sounding the alarm about what is happening to forests in his country. Speaking to the fact that vast areas of Canadian forests are dying out, Canadian Forest Service research scientist Barry Cooke told the CBC, “We see these compelling images of trees dying over large areas and it’s fairly frightening.” The trees, which are dying off, are also a critical source of Canada’s biodiversity.

Meanwhile, a shocking new study showed that the Congo Basin rainforest, the second largest rainforest on Earth, may be gone by the end of this century, given current rates of deforestation. The study does not take into account climate change impacts like drought, wildfires and insect infestations that, of course, speed this up dramatically.

We are all acutely aware of the growing number of people from Central America heading toward the southern US border.

But what is usually not reported by the corporate media is that a vast percentage of these migrants, particularly those from Guatemala, are migrating due to climate change impacts like drought and shifting weather patterns, which are making life ever more difficult for small-scale farmers there.

This fall, a major hurricane in Hawai’i literally erased a small island from the map. Along with that disappearance came the loss of a critical breeding ground for monk seals, turtles and birds.

In what is truly a sign of the times, increasing numbers of “last chance” tourists are flocking to sites before they vanish. A recent article about this “last-chance tourism” — the phenomenon of people wanting to see places that are already irrevocably changed by climate change, or that will likely soon go away entirely — is rather disturbing. Some of the places attracting these “last chance” tourists are the Florida Reef Tract and Glacier National Park in Montana.

To close this section on a slightly heartening note, it is good to see more and more books and articles that are addressing the need to grieve all of this mounting loss.

Water

The now-infamous Pacific Blob, a vast patch of warm water that caused massive die-offs of marine life a few years ago, was just the precursor to what could become a pattern. Another mass of warm water has formed off the coast of Canada’s British Columbia, where warmer than normal ocean water is already covering about a 2,000 sq. km. area.

Despite Oregon being in the normally rainy Pacific Northwest, record heat and low rainfall have caused a declaration of emergency in almost one-third of the counties of the state. Amazingly, 86 percent of the state is also in severe drought.

In a dramatic indication of the rapidly diminishing cryosphere, a large glacier in China that draws millions of tourists annually is melting away before our eyes. The Baishui glacier, at 15,000 feet, is part of a massive blanket of ice in Central Asia referred to as the “third pole,” given that it is the third largest store of ice on the planet, behind Greenland and the Antarctic.

The area of ice, roughly the size of New Mexico and Texas combined, is vital as a water source for billions of people in Asia, and the 10 largest rivers in Asia rely heavily on its seasonal melting. In fact, it is one of the largest sources of freshwater on Earth, and it is in trouble.

Scientists working in China found that, by 2015, 82 percent of the glaciers they surveyed in China had retreated. A study published this year showed that the Baishui had lost 60 percent of its mass and shrunk 820 feet since just 1982.

“China has always had a freshwater supply problem with 20 percent of the world’s population but only 7 percent of its freshwater,” Jonna Nyman, an energy security lecturer at the University of Sheffield, told Phys.org. “That’s heightened by the impact of climate change.”

Scientists have also warned of a coming water crisis due to the melting glaciers in China; they expect it to begin around 2060.

Meanwhile, sea ice and glaciers in other parts of the world are not faring any better.

The Arctic sea ice is now thin enough that Russia is softening its regulations for the kind of vessels it allows to operate within its Northern Sea Route for shipping across the Arctic.

In Canada’s Yukon Territory, glaciers are now retreating much faster than previously believed, and bringing dramatic changes across the region. “In their recent State of the Mountains report published earlier in the summer, the Canadian Alpine Club found that the Saint Elias mountains – which span British Columbia, the Yukon and Alaska – are losing ice faster than the rest of the country,” read a story in The Guardian about the melting glaciers. “Previous research found that between 1957 and 2007, the range lost 22 percent of its ice cover, enough to raise global sea levels by 1.1 millimetres.”

“When I first went to the St. Elias range, it felt like time travel – into the past,” David Hik, who co-edited the report, told The Guardian. “What we’re seeing now feels like time travel into the future. Because as the massive glaciers are retreating, they’re causing a complete reorganization of the environment.”

Then there are the ever-rising seas. Recently, three-fourths of Venice was flooded by an exceptionally high tide, which was augmented by strong winds. It was the worst flooding to inundate the city in a decade, and untold numbers of homes, commercial buildings and businesses flooded. We will, of course, see more of this colossal flooding in the not-so-distant future for all coastal cities around the globe.

One factor that causes the oceans to rise is the expansion of ocean waters as they warm. With that warming come other problems. For example, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef has received another dire warning: the entire system is at risk from bleaching and more coral death. The US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration forecast a 60 percent chance that the entire Great Barrier Reef will reach alert level one, meaning that extreme heat stress and bleaching are likely. 2016 and 2017 both saw heat waves that decimated large swaths of the reef.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s recent report warned that even with just a 1.5°C warming (Earth is currently at 1.1°C), the planet would lose 80 percent of its coral reefs. At 2°C they would all be destroyed.

Fire

California isn’t the only place experiencing increasingly intense and devastating wildfires.

A wildfire in George, South Africa, killed seven people, including a firefighter, as fires in the region are worsening due to ongoing drought and increasingly warming temperatures.

Bushfires following an intense heat wave across parts of Queensland, Australia — described as “highly unusual” for this time of year — have destroyed homes and forced evacuations. Normally, in Queensland, this time of year is the wet season.

“In this part of the world we have not experienced these conditions before,” Queensland Fire and Emergency Services Commissioner Katarina Carroll told the BBC. “It is unprecedented.”

Meanwhile, it’s not news that California, being warmer and drier than it used to be, is causing more and increasingly destructive wildfires as climate change progresses. Another report, this one from National Geographic, outlined how that state’s hottest and driest summers have all occurred in the last 20 years, along with the fact that 15 of the 20 largest wildfires in the state’s history have occurred since just 2000. Additionally, 10 of the top 20 most destructive California wildfires have occurred since just 2010.

Air

According to a recent study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, climate change is likely the cause of tropical cyclones now being pushed toward the poles. This means they are becoming increasingly destructive at the northern latitudes. This is due to the fact that climate change is actually causing the tropics to expand, is warming sea surface temperatures, and these conditions are causing cyclones to form further northward.

A November report by Yale Environment 360 showed that Arctic warming, which is happening twice as quickly as the warming of the rest of the globe, has allowed new species to spread northwards, which are bringing new diseases with them that are having an increasingly devastating impact on the region’s fragile ecosystems.

Denial and Reality

The rhetoric of climate denial is shifting, according to a recent report by Vox. The Republican Party, having become aware that — given the regularity of catastrophic climate events that is now undeniably upon us — engaging in ongoing denial of climate change makes them look bad, has shifted its wording again.

Rather than denying outright the reality of climate change, some Republicans are now increasingly challenging the idea that it is human-caused … while, of course, continuing to do the bidding of its fossil fuel funders. The rhetoric may have shifted, but in a sense, it doesn’t matter: Republicans are still working against any policy changes that might threaten the profits of Big Oil.

In one of the most blatant acts of denial possible, while commenting on the release of the aforementioned alarming US climate change report, President Donald Trump said, “I don’t believe it.”

Back in reality-land, Energy and Environment News published an important story outlining how every single US president from JFK on was warned about the dangers of climate change.

Meanwhile, New York State’s attorney general has sued ExxonMobil, accusing it of deceiving its shareholders by downplaying the risks of climate change.

We must brace ourselves for a truly dystopian climate future that is inevitable. A very important report by Aeon shows us that we’re not just facing a “new normal” of climate extremes and the catastrophes that accompany them. In effect, we are entering a New Cretaceous period.

“Last November, the COP23 UN Climate Change Conference in Bonn reported that warming by 3°C by 2100 is now the realistic expectation,” reads the report. “With no check on emissions, we are on course to see preindustrial levels of CO2 double (from 280 to 560 ppm, or parts per million) by 2050 – and then double again by 2100.

In short, we’ll be generating climate conditions last experienced during the Cretaceous period (145-65.95 million years ago) when CO2 levels reached over 1,000 ppm.”

It is worth noting that during the Cretaceous period, global temperatures were 3-10°C hotter than preindustrial temperatures, and we are currently at 1.1°C above preindustrial temperatures.

A final reality check for us all: The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) recently reported that concentrations of key greenhouse gases in the atmosphere that are driving up global temperatures set a record in 2017. There is no sign of a reversal to this trend on the horizon.

According to the WMO report, the last time Earth experienced a similar concentration of CO2 was 3-5 million years ago, when global temperatures were 2-3°C warmer than today, and sea levels were 10-20 meters higher than they are right now.

CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere are 46 percent higher today than they were before the industrial revolution began. Concurrently, methane, which is a far, far more potent greenhouse gas than CO2, is now present in the atmosphere at 257 percent of its level before the industrial revolution, and its rate of increase has been constant over the last decade.

The catastrophic impacts of runaway climate change are already upon us. We must all consider how to use our time and energies most wisely and carefully, as we face down the most monumental test our species has experienced.



.

Google aids Drone Assassinations

SUBHEAD: The "Don't be Evil" company is secretly aiding the Pentagon with AI technology for better killing.

By Jessica Corbett on 7 March 2018 for Common Dreams -
(https://www.commondreams.org/news/2018/03/07/dont-be-evil-outrage-over-googles-secret-program-bolster-pentagons-drone-war)


Image above: A mash-up of a US killer drone with the Google logo. From (http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/low_concept/features/2013/wargames/if_google_and_apple_went_to_war_what_side_would_obama_pick.html).

[IB Publisher's note: This website uses Google's Blogger software for posting and displaying articles. It has been free, uncensored, and stable for many years. It's too bad that software companies this widespread a line of products and so many users need to stoop to finding better ways to murder human beings. Is that what they must do to provide us with Google Search, GoogleEarth and Blogger?] 

Human rights advocates, tech experts, and critics of the United States' vast drone warfare program are outraged over the Google's secret agreement with the Pentagon—revealed in a pair of reports by Gizmodo and The Intercept—to develop artificial intelligence, or AI, that quickly analyzes drone footage.

Some critics pointed to Google's old motto, "Don't Be Evil," and the replacement, "Do the Right Thing," introduced in 2015 by Google's parent company, Alphabet.

The reports, published Tuesday, outline details of the partnership between Google and the U.S. Department of Defense's Project Maven that were recently disclosed on a company mailing list.

The internal discussion reportedly angered some Google employees, who Gizmodo reports "were outraged that the company would offer resources to the military for surveillance technology involved in drone operations" and pointed out that "the project raised important ethical questions about the development and use of machine learning."

The DOD's Project Maven—also known as the Algorithmic Warfare Cross-Functional Team (AWCFT)—launched last April, and "was tasked with using machine learning to identify vehicles and other objects in drone footage, taking that burden off analysts" who haven't been able to keep up with the amount of footage collected by U.S. drones.

A spokesperson for Google said the company provides the Pentagon with "open source TensorFlow APIs that can assist in object recognition on unclassified data," and insisted "the technology flags images for human review, and is for non-offensive uses only."

However, The Intercept noted—pointing to earlier reports about the project—that the purpose of the AI tech is "to help drone analysts interpret the vast image data vacuumed up from the military's fleet of 1,100 drones to better target bombing strikes against the Islamic State."

While Google's spokesperson added that the company is "actively discussing this important topic internally and with others as we continue to develop policies and safeguards around the development and use of our machine learning technologies," The Intercept also noted that "the military contract with Google is routed through a Northern Virginia technology staffing company called ECS Federal, obscuring the relationship from the public"—at least until it was revealed in Tuesday's reports.

Both reports also pointed out that Eric Schmidt, who recently stepped down as chairman of Alphabet, heads the Defense Innovation Board, a federal advisory committee established in 2016 "to encourage the military adoption of breakthrough technology," and which has developed recommendations for how the Department of Defense can better utilize tools from Silicon Valley to wage war abroad.

Gizmodo, citing meeting minutes, noted that "some members of the Board's teams are part of the executive steering group that is able to provide rapid input" on Project Maven, whose Pentagon director has expressed hope that the project will be "that spark that kindles the flame front of artificial intelligence across the rest of the [Defense] Department."



.

Trump is a cornered animal

SUBHEAD: More than at any point since January, Trump is, right now, the most dangerous man in the world.

By William Rivers Pitt on 15 July 2017 fir Truth Out -
(http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/41281-trump-is-a-cornered-animal-and-cornered-animals-are-dangerous)


Image above: President Donald Trump arrives at the start of the the G20 summit on July 7, 2017, in Hamburg, Germany. From original article.

You have to hand it to this First Family. As advertised, they do nothing small. Buildings wreathed in gold, steaks thicker than city sidewalks, golf courses manicured like supermodels … and scandals rich enough to clot the blood.

The present Russia eruption is a sumptuous feast with all the trimmings, served by a court jester named Junior who, as Stephen Colbert recently observed, decided to be his own "Deep Throat" on the front page of every news publication on the planet.

All the way back to the campaign, the members of the Trump crew have been dogged by questions regarding their relationship with Russia. Before last weekend, Trump and company were content to smother themselves in smug denials while hoping Robert Mueller would get lost on the way to his office, but that all went up in a cloud of stink when The New York Times stepped to the plate.

We have emails, it said, detailing a meeting between Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, Paul Manafort and some mysterious Russian lawyer. Junior, who had denied the whole thing until the Times told him they were about to print the emails, threw caution to the wind and released the emails himself.

All of them. Maybe.
The content in brief: HEY JUNIOR, I KNOW THIS RUSSIAN LAWYER WITH TIES TO THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT WHO HAS DIRT ON CLINTON SHE WANTS TO GIVE YOU BECAUSE THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT WANTS TO HELP YOU WIN.
Reply: I LOVE IT, LET'S MEET AT TRUMP TOWER OF ALL PLACES AND I'LL DRAG IN THE TWO MOST IMPORTANT PEOPLE IN THE CAMPAIGN, BUT BE SURE TO KEEP QUIET ABOUT OUR SECRET PLAN TO HAVE THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT HELP US WIN.
It does come across as just that absurd. That meeting with the Russian lawyer so meticulously documented by Junior was in all likelihood what they call in the intelligence business a "dangle".

That is an offer of information with no real substance to gauge the interest and enthusiasm of the intended target. The fact that Russia made direct efforts to help Donald Trump win in 2016 is now settled fact, but there is far more to this than the election, and the depth of it is dangerous in the extreme.

Some years back, Sergei Magnitsky, an auditor for a Russian law firm, uncovered a tax fraud scheme in his country so vast as to beggar historical precedent.

The perpetrators were stealing whole corporations, looting them, and then using the stolen corporations to launder vast sums of dirty money. In some cases, Russian security forces were involved in these crimes.

Other instances of money laundering involved "Manhattan real estate" entities, according to the criminal complaint filed by former US Attorney Preet Bharara, who was fired by Trump not long after the inauguration.

That Bharara complaint, by the way, was filed against a man named Denis Katsyv, who was the alleged mastermind of the scheme uncovered by Magnitsky.

The story did not end well for Sergei Magnitsky. He was arrested for tax evasion and jailed at the behest of the very oligarchs he was investigating, and later died in prison under very suspicious circumstances.

In retaliation for his death, Congress in 2012 passed a law freezing the assets of 18 Russians involved in the annihilation of Magnitsky. His investigation went nowhere, and when Preet Bharara lost his job as US Attorney, the whole thing quietly blew away.

Or did it? Vladimir Putin was not happy when those 18 Russians had their assets frozen, and retaliated by ending all adoptions of Russian children by US families.

To promote this edict, Putin tapped an attorney named Natalia Veselnitskaya to help with the public relations push. Natalia Veselnitskaya was also the attorney for Denis Katysyv, author of the scheme uncovered by Magnitsky, in the matter being pursued by Bharara.

Natalia Veselnitskaya was the Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort at Trump Tower in June of 2016 as part of the Russian government’s effort to help Donald Trump win the election.

On Friday morning, the story took a remarkable twist when NBC News revealed the existence of a fifth person present at the meeting with Trump Jr., Kushner, Manafort and Veselnitskaya. Rinat Akhmetshin, a Russian-American lobbyist and former counter-intelligence officer with the Soviet military, accompanied Veselnitskaya to the meeting.

Red flags began waving immediately upon this revelation: Not only were Veselnitskaya and Akhmetshin associates in the lobbying effort to undo the sanctions against those 18 Russians involved in the Magnitsky affair, but Akhmetshin has been accused of orchestrating a massive international hacking conspiracy at the behest of a billionaire Russian industrialist. It is worth noting that Akhmetshin is a US citizen, and Robert Mueller's subpoena power absolutely includes US citizens.

… and then, just before 9:00am on Friday morning, Trump Jr.'s own lawyer revealed the existence of a sixth person who was present at the Trump Tower meeting. At the time of this writing, the name of that sixth person remains unknown. Before 5:00pm on the same day, CNN was reporting that eight people or more actually attended the meeting.

Magnitsky to Katsyv to Veselnitskaya and Akhmetshin to Trump Tower, with Vladimir Putin hovering over it all and an indeterminate number of others along for the ride.

Junior's first explanation for the meeting was that Veselnitskaya wanted to talk about "adoptions," which may well have been code for a push to have the sanctions lifted against those 18 Russians involved in the Magnitsky matter, should Trump emerge victorious in November.

Veselnitskaya and Akhmetshin have been working for years, the former at the behest of Putin, to undo those sanctions. It is all of a piece, and as the old saying goes, when you hear hoofbeats, don't think of zebras.

We are dealing with some very grim possibilities here. In the worst case scenario, the president of the United States, his son and top campaign/administration staffers got themselves involved with an agent for the Russian government who is neck-deep in a massive money laundering scandal that may very well have gotten a guy killed in prison.

These issues could explain why Robert Mueller has tapped the best money laundering prosecutors and investigators in all of US jurisprudence to join his team.

It would seem that whatever slivers of credibility the Trump administration ever possessed have been consumed by this bonfire of hubris, lying and shady dealing (though much of his base remains loyal).

Congressional Republicans are trying to pretend the White House doesn't actually exist as their legislative agenda founders like a rot-riddled rowboat. The only statement coming out of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue is "Talk to the lawyers," lather rinse repeat.

Junior is about to have a series of incredibly unpleasant conversations with some very serious people, whereupon he may come to learn -- perhaps for the first time in his life -- the meaning of the word "consequences."

Messrs. Kushner and Manafort, who were actual campaign employees when that fateful meeting took place, and are therefore subject to a whole raft of other laws, can expect the same. The legal fate of the other meeting attendees remains to be determined.

And as for the Tweeter in Chief? On Thursday, he blamed the whole thing on Loretta Lynch and the Obama administration for allowing Natalia Veselnitskaya to enter the country in the first place. This is the growling of a cornered animal.

Any takeaway from all this, though, must not include "Donald Trump is finished," because sometimes a cornered animal is exceedingly dangerous. Trump and his whole crew are preposterous frauds, but he still retains the enormous powers of the presidency, and he is watching much of his world collapse around him.

At this point, he is capable of just about anything, especially if he believes he is defending his family.

Thanks to the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force, Trump has the power to start and/or escalate wars at will, and war is a time-tested method of distraction. He still has control over a vast nuclear arsenal.

The current scandal is yet another glaring indication that Trump and his people are more than comfortable engaging in shady dealings behind closed doors. Plus, in the event of a terrorist attack, real or imagined, Trump has astonishing police powers at his disposal. None of us can accurately guess what he's capable of as president.

This is not alarmism. This is enlightened self-interest. Fear and vigilance are highly appropriate responses at this juncture. More than at any point since January, Donald Trump is, right now, the most dangerous man in the world.

.

GOP Elector won't vote Trump

SUBHEAD: Why I will not cast my electoral vote for Donald Trump says paremedic/emergency responder.

By Christopher Suprun on 5 December 2016 for the New York Times
(http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/05/opinion/why-i-will-not-cast-my-electoral-vote-for-donald-trump.html)


Image above: Christorpher Supran in From original article.

I am a Republican presidential elector, one of the 538 people asked to choose officially the president of the United States. Since the election, people have asked me to change my vote based on policy disagreements with Donald J. Trump.

In some cases, they cite the popular vote difference. I do not think presidents-elect should be disqualified for policy disagreements. I do not think they should be disqualified because they won the Electoral College instead of the popular vote.

However, now I am asked to cast a vote on Dec. 19 for someone who shows daily he is not qualified for the office.

Fifteen years ago, as a firefighter, I was part of the response to the Sept. 11 attacks against our nation. That attack and this year’s election may seem unrelated, but for me the relationship becomes clearer every day.

George W. Bush is an imperfect man, but he led us through the tragic days following the attacks. His leadership showed that America was a great nation. That was also the last time I remember the nation united. I watch Mr. Trump fail to unite America and drive a wedge between us.

Mr. Trump goes out of his way to attack the cast of “Saturday Night Live” for bias. He tweets day and night, but waited two days to offer sympathy to the Ohio State community after an attack there. He does not encourage civil discourse, but chooses to stoke fear and create outrage.

This is unacceptable. For me, America is that shining city on a hill that Ronald Reagan envisioned. It has problems. It has challenges. These can be met and overcome just as our nation overcame Sept. 11.

The United States was set up as a republic. Alexander Hamilton provided a blueprint for states’ votes.

Federalist 68 argued that an Electoral College should determine if candidates are qualified, not engaged in demagogy, and independent from foreign influence.

Mr. Trump shows us again and again that he does not meet these standards. Given his own public statements, it isn’t clear how the Electoral College can ignore these issues, and so it should reject him.

I have poured countless hours into serving the party of Lincoln and electing its candidates. I will pour many more into being more faithful to my party than some in its leadership. But I owe no debt to a party. I owe a debt to my children to leave them a nation they can trust.

Mr. Trump lacks the foreign policy experience and demeanor needed to be commander in chief. During the campaign more than 50 Republican former national security officials and foreign policy experts co-signed a letter opposing him.

In their words, “he would be a dangerous president.” During the campaign Mr. Trump even said Russia should hack Hillary Clinton’s emails. This encouragement of an illegal act has troubled many members of Congress and troubles me.

Hamilton also reminded us that a president cannot be a demagogue. Mr. Trump urged violence against protesters at his rallies during the campaign. He speaks of retribution against his critics.

He has surrounded himself with advisers such as Stephen K. Bannon, who claims to be a Leninist and lauds villains and their thirst for power, including Darth Vader. “Rogue One,” the latest “Star Wars” installment, arrives later this month. I am not taking my children to see it to celebrate evil, but to show them that light can overcome it.

Gen. Michael T. Flynn, Mr. Trump’s pick for national security adviser, has his own checkered past about rules. He installed a secret internet connection in his Pentagon office despite rules to the contrary. Sound familiar?

Finally, Mr. Trump does not understand that the Constitution expressly forbids a president to receive payments or gifts from foreign governments. We have reports that Mr. Trump’s organization has business dealings in Argentina, Bahrain, Taiwan and elsewhere. Mr. Trump could be impeached in his first year given his dismissive responses to financial conflicts of interest. He has played fast and loose with the law for years.

He may have violated the Cuban embargo, and there are reports of improprieties involving his foundation and actions he took against minority tenants in New York. Mr. Trump still seems to think that pattern of behavior can continue.

The election of the next president is not yet a done deal. Electors of conscience can still do the right thing for the good of the country. Presidential electors have the legal right and a constitutional duty to vote their conscience.

I believe electors should unify behind a Republican alternative, an honorable and qualified man or woman such as Gov. John Kasich of Ohio. I pray my fellow electors will do their job and join with me in discovering who that person should be.

Fifteen years ago, I swore an oath to defend my country and Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. On Dec. 19, I will do it again.


.

Hillary & the Ghost of Watergate

SUBHEAD: The parallels between Clinton and Nixon are political. How can a leader crippled by scandal govern?

By Charles Hugh Smith on 1 November 2016 for Of Two Minds -
(http://www.oftwominds.com/blognov16/hillary-watergate11-16.html)


Image above: Illustrated mashup of Richard Nixon and Hillary Clinton. From (https://www.pinterest.com/pin/457537643369474266/).

If there is any lesson to be learned from the ghosts of Watergate, it is that the big-money support of a leader who has lost the ability to deliver the goods crumbles very quickly as the endgame unfolds.

The parallels between Hillary Clinton and Richard Nixon are not legal--they are political: specifically, how can a leader crippled by scandal and cover-ups govern?

In even blunter terms: how can a crippled politico deliver the goods to the special interests who bet their cash and political capital on the politico's ability to deliver favors?

Among the many ghosts of Watergate, one specter especially haunts Hillary: once the special interests and party stalwarts who defended you through every scandal and every cover-up--month after month and year after year, on the promise that you would deliver the goods upon ascending to the presidency--realize you are too damaged to deliver anything of value to anyone, why would they continue supporting you?

Once a politico has to declare "I am not a crook" based on legalese rather than a moral foundation, that politico's ability to lead has vanished. Hillary and her supporters rely entirely on legalese parsing of wrong-doing rather than on a self-explanatory, basic moral foundation of right and wrong.

Declaring "I am not a crook" because the wrongdoing escapes prosecution is the same as declaring "I am above the law." If the foundation of one's ability to lead is a reliance on legal parsing and allies in the Department of Justice squashing investigations while handing out immunity like candy on Halloween, the political capital required to lead no longer exists.

Ultimately, the President leads by moral suasion. Even the political act of delivering the goods to the special interests that funded your campaign and your wealth must be backed by the moral authority of personal integrity and a morally grounded appeal to the common good.

A politician who has effectively zero personal integrity is only as viable as his/her ability to deliver favors to the few (i.e. special interests) over the objections of the many. A reliance on cold-blooded horse-trading only works if the leader has enough political capital to arm-twist everyone into granting favors to allies and special interests..

Trumptopia

SUBHEAD: The tragedy is that no other serious, grown-up figures stepped forward in this dangerous moment of history.

By James Kunstler on 9 May 2016 for Kunstler.om -
(http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/trumptopia/)


Image above: Donlad Trump media storm. From (https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2016/03/28/video-donald-trumps-daughter-in-law-continues-her-support-in-presidential-race-america-first-abc-nyt-interviews/).

For years, it was easy to see the political storm clouds gather over Europe with its fractious coalitions and its ancient babble of conflicts. Marine Le Pen’s Daddy, severe old Jean-Marie, was on the scene in France decades before Donald Trump ascended to glory on the noxious clouds of America’s crapified culture, attended by heavenly hosts of Kardashian angels and the cherub Honey BooBoo.

For all the strains in recent American life, the two-party system had seemed as solid as the granite towers of the Brooklyn Bridge.

Not even the estimable Teddy Roosevelt could blow up the system when he tried in 1912 — though his Progressive (“Bull Moose”) Party carried California, Pennsylvania, and Minnesota, and he far out-polled the incumbent Republican President Taft, who garnered a measly 8 electoral votes (Democrat Woodrow Wilson won).

Ross Perot made an impact in 1992 — he certainly had a good point about NAFTA and “the giant sucking sound” of jobs draining out of the USA. But his popinjay manner didn’t go over so well, and at the critical moment in the general election he lost his nerve and withdrew, only to foolishly re-enter weeks later.

Then there was the Ralph Nader in 2000, whose egoistic crusade arguably put George W. Bush in the White House.

Since then, the country see-sawed between the long tenures of two Deep State errand boys from each major party, putting both parties in such a bad odor that Trump now rises on their mephitic fumes. Which raises the question, of course: what exactly is this Deep State? Answer:

A leviathan of symbiotic rackets producing maximum incompetence affecting adversely the majority of citizens. It’s a blood-sucking beast of a hundred-thousand heads draining the USA of its dwindling vitality, lying about its intentions while it advertises the pietistic certainties of the Left and superstitious shibboleths of the Right, leaving a smoking hole in the middle where the practical problems of everyday life used to be worked out by practical means.

The Deep State is also the sum of unintended consequences and diminishing returns of a late-stage, bureaucratic, techno-industrial economy cannibalizing itself to stay alive.

One obvious conclusion is that this economy has got to change before there is nothing left to eat, and no political figure on the scene, including Trump and Bernie Sanders, has a plausible vision of where this takes us. Both really just assume that the engine keeps chugging down the track of ever more material wealth that can be distributed differently.

The truth is, there will be a lot less material wealth of the kind we’re used to, and a lot less capital representation in the things we call “money.” In fact, the scene at hand today is just a spectacle of the shrewdest and biggest rodents scarfing up the table-scraps of a 200-year-long banquet.

Hillary Clinton, of course, is the Deep State incarnate, which is the real reason so few citizens trust her. Every poor schnook getting shaken down for a $90,000 appendectomy bill looks at Hillary and knows exactly what she represents.

Every 25-year-old jobless, couch-surfing millennial carrying fifty-grand in college debt sees the face of the Deep State in her self-satisfied demi-smile. Mainly, she has gulled the diversity pimps — because they are wards of the Deep State — and women, because it’s Mommy’s “turn” to direct the Deep State.

Writer, financier, and Deep State rogue operative Jim Rickards keeps insisting that Uncle Joe Biden will end up as the Democratic nominee. (He said so in a Tweet just the other day). You have to wonder what this guy knows. Don’t suppose that Uncle Joe is the knight on a white horse you’ve been waiting for. After all, he’s vice-president of the Deep State.

Voters seem attracted to Trump because he’s so eager to give the finger to the Deep State. It deserves the finger, but it also needs to be carefully disassembled without blowing up what remains of this country. Trump already has a good start on blowing up the Republican Party.

Never before have so many party officials dissociated themselves from the (so far) presumptive nominee. I expect to see more extreme measures against Trump to be yet attempted by the party mandarins in the two months before the convention. I doubt you will hear about them before they happen.

In the face of that, Trump’s behavior only gets more childish. His speech after the Indiana primary was a masterpiece of incoherence. Everything that reflected on the magnificence of his victory was “incredible.” Interestingly, that was exactly the right word. He’s tuned in to the national nervous breakdown underway.

From time to time, when he’s not speaking emptily about how much he is loved, Trump voices some legitimate concern of the Deep State’s victims. There are few decent jobs outside the Deep State’s own rackets. We’re not obliged to take in a limitless stream of immigrants.

Nation-building by military means has been a dismal failure. The national debt is a problem. The country’s infrastructure is decrepit. Trump says he can negotiate a fix to all this: the art of the deal. Blowing smoke up the Deep State’s ass is not a plan.

The tragedy is that no other serious, grown-up figures stepped forward in this dangerous moment of history. The party that Trump purports to represent lost itself in a wilderness of grift, jingoism, and supernatural pettifoggery.

The rival Democratic Party is high on the fumes of “diversity and inclusion,” kindergarten politics that only corrode what’s left of our tattered common culture. Hillary’s Deep State couldn’t have found a better diversionary subterfuge. Both parties are close to blowing up altogether. I’m not convinced that they’ll survive their own conventionas this summer. Then what?

.

Naomi Klein at the Vatican

SUBHEAD: Activist and author praises 'courageous' invitation by Pope in face of fossil fuel industry's power.

By Nadia Prupis on 2 July 2015 for Common Dreams -
(http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/07/02/invited-vatican-naomi-klein-makes-moral-case-world-beyond-fossil-fuels)


Image above: Author and activist Naomi Klein spoke at the Vatican on Wednesday, calling climate change a "moral crisis" that should unite all people. (Photo: Adolfo Lujan/flickr/cc). From original article.

Naomi Klein—activist, author, and self-described "secular Jewish feminist"—spoke at the Vatican on Wednesday where she championed the Pope's message for global action on climate change and made the case for "the beautiful world" beyond fossil fuel addiction.

Klein, who was invited to speak by the Vatican, gave her speech ahead of a two-day conference to discuss the Pope's recent encyclical, Laudato Si', on the environment and the threat of the global economic system—subjects that the author of This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate knows well.

The encyclical has garnered praise from environmental campaigners like Greenpeace International's Kumi Naidoo, who called it a "clarion call for bold, urgent action."

"Pope Francis writes early on that Laudato Si’ is not only a teaching for the Catholic world but for 'every person living on this planet.' And I can say that as a secular Jewish feminist who was rather surprised to be invited to the Vatican, it certainly spoke to me," Klein told reporters ahead of the conference, which is called People and Planet First: the Imperative to Change Course.

She praised what she described as "the core message of interconnection at the heart of the encyclical."

Klein also expanded on what may appear to be an unlikely alliance with the leader of the Catholic Church.

"Given the attacks that are coming from the Republican party around this and also the fossil fuel interests in the United States, it was a particularly courageous decision to invite me here," she said, according to the Associated Press. "I think it indicates that the Holy See is not being intimidated, and knows that when you say powerful truths, you make some powerful enemies and that's part of what this is about."

"I have noticed a common theme among the critiques. Pope Francis may be right on the science, we hear, and even on the morality, but he should leave the economics and policy to the experts," Klein said in her speech. "They are the ones who know about carbon trading and water privatization, we are told, and how effectively markets can solve any problem. I forcefully disagree.

"The truth is that we have arrived at this dangerous place partly because many of those economic experts have failed us badly, wielding their powerful technocratic skills without wisdom," she said.

"In a world where profit is consistently put before both people and the planet, climate economics has everything to do with ethics and morality. Because if we agree that endangering life on earth is a moral crisis, then it is incumbent on us to act like it."

Echoing the Pope's message to address inequities, Klein said that "our current system is also fueling ever widening inequality."

But Klein stressed that her appearance at the Vatican did not mean that any one world view was "being subsumed by anyone else's."

"This is an alliance on a specific issue. It's not a merger," Klein said. "But when you are faced with a crisis of this magnitude, people have to get out of their comfort zones."

Despite the magnitude of the crisis, Klein stressed: "We can save ourselves."

"Around the world, the climate justice movement is saying: See the beautiful world that lies on the other side of courageous policy, the seeds of which are already bearing ample fruit for any who care to look.

"Then, stop making the difficult the enemy of the possible.
"And join us in making the possible real," she said.

The two-day conference, which comes in the lead-up to the COP21 international climate talks in Paris later this year, is being coordinated by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and the International Cooperation for Development and Solidarity (CIDSE), an alliance of Catholic development agencies.

Alongside Klein, other speakers include Ottmar Edenhofer, co-chair of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pontifical council president H.E. Cardinal Peter Turkson, and CIDSE secretary general Bernard Nils.


.

Honestly framing the Climate Crisis

SUBHEAD: This crisis is not about warm weather, it's about grievous injury, wanton destruction and mass extinction.

By Zhiwa Woodbury on 20 June 2015 for TruthOut -
(http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/31372-getting-our-story-straight-honestly-framing-the-climate-crisis)


Image above: Catholic survivors of super typhoon Haiyan, after made landfall in the Philippines, seek solice from Pope Francis. From original article and (http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2014/mar/14/catholic-survivors-of-super-typhoon-haiyan-revisited-in-pictures).

As a lifelong eco-activist, I always thought it was a critical mistake to name the crisis caused by excessive carbon emissions into the atmosphere "Global Warming." It made it sound like it was about the weather, when in reality it is about the end of life as we humans have always known it.

I was somewhat encouraged when the term "Climate Change" entered the conversation, because at least it is a more accurate scientific term for what is happening. But as Per Epsen Stoknes points out in his new book on the psychology of the climate crisis, What We Think About When We Try Not To Think About Global Warming, this term has fared no better at conveying the urgency and seriousness of this mortal crisis to the average (distracted) American consumer.

As the recent film Merchants of Doubt makes clear, the enemy is corporate malfeasance, and the problem is poor public relations. Neither 'warming' nor 'change' are, on their face, objectionable, and so it's hard to get the public's attention. As Stoknes points out, Republican strategists had no problem in devising a simple public relations strategy to blunt any talk of climate change: "change is natural - the climate has always been changing."

 Which, of course, is true. One such change in the climate, referred to by paleontologists as "the Great Dying," resulted in the extinction of over 90 percent of all species on Earth and required 10 million years for complex life forms to re-emerge.

Somehow, I suspect another great dying would not poll very well. But all it took was a six-degree rise in average global temperature to trigger the methane feedback loop that caused the last one. Many scientists now believe this could happen within our children's lifetimes.

The fact that natural forces will conspire with our myopic political leaders to bring about the extinction of our species will be small consolation to our grandchildren and the last children on Earth.

Stoknes settles on "climate disruption" as his preferred frame for the climate crisis. I find that to be grossly inadequate in conveying the deep emotional response that we need to impart to average Americans to overcome the death-grip that corporate media and fossil-fueled politics presently has on public opinion.

To 'disrupt' means to upset established order. Hey - I'm in favor of that, too! It fails to accurately convey what the result of such upset is and gives the impression of being a mere inconvenience to our present way of life.

If this framing of the crisis is as important as Stoknes contends - and I believe it is, given the continuing failure of Americans to view the crisis with appropriate urgency - then we need to do much better than "disruption."

A fan running onto the field of play in a sporting event 'disrupts' the game, but they do not end it. The game goes on. With this climate crisis, life as we know it is not going to continue.

According to "The Global Burden of Disease Study" (2010) published in the British medical journal, The Lancet, human deaths attributable to the climate crisis are already up at least five-fold compared to deaths from natural forces in 1970. Already, approximately 400,000 people die every year due to unnatural changes in the climate, including 1,000 children every day.

The World Health Organization estimates more than half a holocaust's worth of people (3.7 million) are now dying every year from fossil fuel combustion across the planet.

And we're worried about ISIS?!

And, of course, placing all this in its proper context, we are now in the midst of another mass extinction event. We've wiped out half of all wildlife in just the last 40 years, and an international team of ecologists and economists predicts our oceans will be devoid of fish by 2048. According to the National Geographic Society, somewhere between 50 and 200 species go extinct every day, compared to a natural extinction rate of one every 10 days or so.

So what should we call this crisis? What is an accurate frame that imparts the emotional impact of what we are presently doing to the planet, its inhabitants, and to all future generations?
After much thought and linguistic research, I want to suggest that we start today referring to this crisis as Climate Mayhem. It is simple, to the point, and accurate on all counts. Nobody can say they are in favor of mayhem, right?

According to my go-to dictionary, the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, mayhem involves "the infliction of violent injury upon a person or thing; wanton destruction" or "a state of violent disorder or riotous confusion; havoc."

It is rooted in the word for "maiming." Vast oceanic graveyards and clear-cut rain forests sounds like maiming the planet to me. The word "wanton," in turn, means "immoral … maliciously cruel; merciless … freely extravagant" and "excessive."

That all rings true as well. And just speaking emotionally, mayhem is a word that has always sent chills up my spine - as does a world without elephants, tigers, rhinos, polar bears, orangutans …

As an ecopsychologist, I view the Earth as a living organism - a being, not a thing. As an ethical Buddhist who appreciates both science and karma, I am painfully aware of the 40-year time-lag between the actions we are taking today and the effects they will have on our mother, Earth.

Pope Francis is spot-on in framing Climate Mayhem as a moral crisis. It is a crisis of both spirit and psyche. In wreaking havoc on the planet, we are pathologically acting out in ways that promise our own demise.

Mayhem is a criminal law term as well, referring to the infliction of grievous bodily injury. That is precisely what we are doing to the planet. We've detonated over 2,000 nuclear weapons, we've removed mountains and filled rivers to extract coal for burning, we're fracking, destroying boreal forests to extract tar sands, threatening the arctic with deep-sea drilling, and we're poisoning her with daily doses of plutonium, strontium and cesium (Fukushima).

This is a moral crime of the highest order, and if our species manages to survive - as I believe we will in spite of the maiming of our life support system - history will hold today's political leaders to account in much the same way we presently hold past political leaders like Nero, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot and Mao to account for the millions upon millions of beautiful human being they sent to their tragic deaths.

Does that sound like an extreme view to you? Polemical, perhaps?

Consider this. Unlike politicians from the last century, today's leaders cannot plead ignorance to future tribunals concerning the effects of their decisions.

When President Obama sent his emissaries to Durban, South Africa, in 2011 with instructions to preclude any enforceable carbon reductions from taking effect before 2020, Africans marched in the streets and protested, with good science to back them up, that America's first African-American president was sentencing upwards of 150 million Africans – many of whom have nothing to do with the climate crisis - to death.

Of course, the corporate media ignored this story, so you may not have known about those demonstrations.

Two years later, when the climate talks moved to Warsaw, Poland, - one of the cities most effected by the Holocaust - the strongest tropical cyclone ever to make landfall in recorded history, "Super Typhoon" Haiyan, became the deadliest cyclone ever to hit the Philippines, killing over 6,300 people.

Yeb Saño, a member of the Philippines Climate Change Commission who had broken down while addressing the climate delegates just a year earlier under remarkably similar circumstances, told the delegates: "What my country is going through as a result of this extreme climate event is madness. The climate crisis is madness."

Madness. Climate Mayhem. Let's start being honest with ourselves. Words have power. Our political leaders and their corporate sponsors are engaged in thermo-chemical warfare on Planet Earth, recklessly placing all life forms at grave risk for the sole purpose of aggregating obscene wealth and power. The solutions to the climate crisis are not complicated. We simply need to convert from fossil fuels to renewable energy and from chemically intensive monoculture to sustainable agro-ecology.

The only thing that is stopping us is the moral turpitude of politicians and bad public relations on our part. In order to begin holding corrupt politicians to task, we must begin by speaking truth to power and counteracting corporate media-driven propaganda.

This crisis is not about warm weather, it's not about change - it's about grievous injury, wanton destruction and mass extinction.

It is mayhem.

.

TGI as apologists' highway

SUBHEAD: TGI is heavily influenced by the corporations, organizations and individuals doing Kauai the most harm.

By Juan Wilson on 2 February 2014 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2014/02/tgi-as-apologists-highway.html)


Image above: Typical fluff. Front page TGI photo by Dennis Fujimoto on 2/2/14.  Halea Bactad and Jessica Kaleiohi, react to the ice water during the polar plunge Saturday at Kapaa Beach Park. From (http://thegardenisland.com/news/local/plunging-for-a-good-cause/article_0e0ca90e-8bd6-11e3-86bf-001a4bcf887a.html).

This Sunday the only newspaper on Kauai, the Garden Island News has an unusually heavy number of of neer-do-wells and P.R. flaks pimping for organizations that are under pressure from island residents.

Number 1:
Front page banner headline
Atrazine Hazard Use Down

THE GIST: Don't worry. Even though Syngenta manufactures Atrazine and uses it and many more restricted use pesticides in GMO plant experiments near Kauai neighborhoods you don't have to be concerned because that's just a bad memory fading in the rear view mirror. You should trust our government's regulating efforts and the corporations providing the few jobs left on Kauai.



Atrazine Hazard Use Down
Report shines light on statewide use of chemical herbicide
By Chis D'Angelo on 2 February 2014 for TGI  (http://thegardenisland.com/news/local/atrazine-hazard-use-down/article_44c742c0-8bd5-11e3-b454-001a4bcf887a.html)

Over the last seven decades, the use of atrazine in Hawaii has declined significantly, from about 400,000 pounds in 1964 to 77,403 pounds in 2012, according to a recent study by the state Department of Health. And much of that drop is the result of the state’s dying sugar industry.

For anyone concerned about atrazine and its potential health and environmental impacts, DOH supervisor Fenix Grange said the report should be “extraordinarily comforting.” “The hazard is going down, not going up,” she said. “But to be sure, we’re going out and collecting samples.”

The legislative report — as well as the DOH’s current sampling effort — is the fruit of House Concurrent Resolution 129.

Adopted in April, it called for the DOH to head up a task force to address the potential data gaps on air, surface water and near-shore effects of the chemical herbicide.

“Last spring they asked for an atrazine study, because atrazine was kind of the flavor of the month,” said Grange, who prepared the report along with DOH toxicologist Barbara Brooks.

The report, completed in November and recently posted online, found that the sugar industry “was and is the largest user of atrazine in Hawaii.”

“The drop in atrazine usage over time reflects the decline of sugarcane cultivation, cancellation of some uses and more restrictive label application rates,” according to the report.

HCR 129 states “it is in the best interest of the state to be at the forefront of a monitoring and regulatory effort to protect Hawaii residents from the potential adverse effects of chronic atrazine exposure.”

Grange said the 63-page report is the first of its kind, a compilation of historical atrazine use data throughout the state. Manufactured by Syngenta,
Atrazine is a pre- or post-emergence herbicide used for weed control. Registered in the U.S. since 1958, it is one of the most widely used herbicides, with 76.5 million pounds of the active ingredient used domestically each year...
Click here for more.




Number 2:
Front page above the fold story
Mayor - Attacks are politically motivated

THE GIST: It must be getting hotter in Mayor Bernard P. Carvalho's inner sanctum to have  a heavy hitting Honolulu attorney respond to recent actions by Kauai residents to have the mayor step down for inappropriate use of a county credit card for personal gain and refusal to testify and so violating Hawaii Statute 78-9. See GasGate article here.


Mayor - Attacks are politically motivated
Carvalho’s attorney responds to public criticism
By Darin Moriki on 2 February 2014 for TGI  (http://thegardenisland.com/news/local/mayor-attacks-are-politically-motivated/article_b63ef294-8bd6-11e3-9289-001a4bcf887a.html)

Kauai Mayor Bernard Carvalho Jr. is dismissing claims that he violated state law during a county audit investigation that began four years ago.

The two-term mayor issued a statement on Saturday through his Honolulu-based attorney in response to public claims that he had violated the law.

The allegations, released in emails to county officials, state lawmakers and several media outlets over the past two weeks, called on Carvalho to step down because he did not cooperate with a criminal investigation stemming from an audit of county fuel charges.
“This is old news and curiously comes at a time when the mayor is ramping up a re-election campaign,” Carvalho’s personal attorney Eric Seitz said in the statement. “These allegations are without merit and an examination of the facts will show the mayor has done nothing wrong.”
The audit, published by County Auditor Ernesto “Ernie” Pasion in April 2012, implied that Carvalho and other county employees illegally used county fuel for personal use.
A subsequent review of the allegations by the attorney general’s office found no basis for further criminal investigation.
Because Carvalho invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refused to answer questions during the investigation, several residents, including Glenn Mickens, Ken Taylor, Michael Sheehan, and Sheehan’s attorney Richard E. Wilson, said state laws specifically call for Carvalho to vacate office.
“Your tenure as mayor has ended,” Wilson wrote in a Jan. 30 letter addressed to Carvalho.
Click here for more. 



Number 3:

Editorial Page Guest Commentary
KIUC top goal remains reducing bills

THE GIST: It's funny that if that is the goal of KIUC for the last decade in that we still have the most expensive electricity in the country. Maybe it's partially because of the over generous perks to the KIUC executive elite. Maybe it's because its the board's refusal to face a future of less consumption and centralization of electrical power generation. Maybe it's because KIUC is not really a cooperative at all, but just another corporation bleeding its customers.


 KIUC top goal remains reducing bills
By KIUC Chair Allan Smith on 2 February 2014 in TGI
Now that the special election on meter fees is concluded, I want to thank the 43 percent of our members who took the time to learn about the issue and to vote.

We're especially grateful to the 74 percent who voted "yes" and supported the decision of their elected board.

I want to make some observations about our member-owned cooperative, about our obligations as directors and about the realities of running a public utility.

As an elected director, I have the fiduciary duty to represent the interests of all members of KIUC.

This includes our industrial and commercial members who represent 60 percent of our revenue as well as our 25,000 residential customers. As a lifelong resident of Kauai, I take my responsibilities seriously, especially when considering how the actions I take today will affect future generations.

Over the course of this election, I've heard some people talk about "making the cooperative act like a cooperative." The way they would accomplish this is to increase the influence of a tiny minority of the members and put operational decisions of the utility up for a popular vote.

Cooperative and democratic principles are not based on the tyranny of the minority, but rather on representing the views of the majority. As for running the utility, I'm confident that the great majority would prefer to leave that to the professional staff and elected board.

As chairman of KIUC's board, I only am one vote of nine. Every action we take must receive the support of a majority of the directors. This is how a cooperative works. This is how democracy works. We must be able to compromise, we *must accept that we do not always get our way and, win or lose, we must move on to address the next issue.

Once the board makes a decision, we have the fiduciary duty to advocate for that decision and explain to members why they should support it. Yet this is seen by some as violating the principles

of the cooperative. To me, it would not only break our commitments as directors but would go against common sense to remain silent on a challenge to one of our decisions.

In the event of future petitions, we will continue to educate our members on why the decision was made and what's at stake for the cooperative. We will ask for their vote to support the elected directors' decisions.

I am increasingly concerned by the process that allows 250 people to sign a petition - less than 1 percent of our membership - to challenge actions taken by the board. Particularly when a repeat petition challenger told The Garden Island that he "was more excited about the high voter turnout than disappointed about the results ... that's good for democracy ... I'm glad that we had the conversation."

It was not a conversation, it was a confrontation,  one that cost the membership well over $100,000 in direct expenses and staff time.

While the petitioners may look upon this as some sort of academic exercise, a challenge to a board action is a very serious matter. We do not take it lightly. And now, for the second time in three years, nearly three-quarters of the members who voted in a petition election defeated a challenge of a board action.

While the petitioner believes the high turnout was "good for democracy," he shouldn't tryto spin the outcome as a win. I took it as a sign that many of our members are fed up.

This was a direct rebuke from the vast majority of members who are tired of seeing their cooperative's time and resources diverted from the No. I goal in our strategic plan: cutting their electric bill.

Now we have another vote coming up. The ballots will be arriving soon for the 2014 board of directors election. I hope our members will remain engaged and will vote after studying the backgrounds and positions of the 11 candidates.

As directors, our job is to make choices. Some choices are more popular than others. But we make these choices in a thoughtful, responsible manner and in the best interests of our members and Kauai.
IB note: This article was not online at time of this publication.




CONCLUSION
My take on these three TGI articles is an increasing distrust of having no paper of record actually published on Kauai. The news (and the lawyering) is coming from Oahu and beyond. This stuff is a lot of mushy mealy public relations sprinkled with sugar (or more likely HFCS).

I praise the individual letters to the editor and the efforts of some of our on islands reporters, but TGI is heavily influenced by the corporations, organizations and individuals doing Kauai the most harm.

The real issues are related to Conservation, Decentralization and Rehumanization. See more Ea O Ka Aina: A Bargain with the Archdruid.
.

Would you still try?

SUBHEAD: If you knew it was too late to save society, would you still try?

By Guy McPherson on 6 June 2013 for the Good Men Project -
(http://goodmenproject.com/social-justice-2/social-justice-divided-we-fall-and-so-we-are/)


Image above: The great mechanical civilization of the past used many “engines” such as this remnant to do all manner of work and transportation. They in turn were powered by vast underground resources of oil or “fossil fuels” that were easily mined. It was the depletion of these fuels that made that age disappear as quickly as it came. Photo and caption by RickC at (http://www.flickr.com/photos/randa/614337210).

In prior essays for the Good Men Project, I focused on three of six questions asked by Socrates as he pursued a life of excellence: (1) What is justice? (2) What is good? (3) What is courage? The additional questions posed by Socrates are: (4) What is piety? (5) What is moderation? (6) What is virtue? The latter question is the subject of the current essay.

Merriam and Webster equate virtue with morality, the definition of which dives into the notion of right and wrong. Color me confused, either by the teleology of the linguistic pursuit or my own inimitable ignorance, but I believe right action depends completely on circumstances.

Consider, for example, the case of global climate chaos and the irreversible self-reinforcing feedback loops triggered by industrial civilization. If overwhelming evidence points toward near-term human extinction, how shall we respond? What actions are deemed virtuous in this circumstance?

Let’s start with reason. A rational world view demands truth, rather than wishful thinking, as the basis for action. As Carl Sagan said, “It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.”

Personally, I am profoundly committed to a life of service rooted in reason. For me, a life lived otherwise is not worth living. Indeed, as Socrates demonstrated by example, some things are worth dying for. Service to community and lifelong education certainly fill the bill, regardless how dire our straits.

I am not surprised many people fail to understand the idea that we’re all in this together. Contemporary culture has driven us apart, encouraging us to value competition over cooperation. I am not surprised many people fail to understand that, as the expression goes, divided we fall. And so we are.

Our culture has promoted faux individualism instead of real collaboration. It’s all about me and my stuff, me and my success, me and my ego in this hyper-indulgent morass of American exceptionalism (and pursuit of American ideals by the civilized world).

I recognize it’s too late to save society, and industrialized society is irredeemable, regardless. Capitalism is assumed to be the best, most efficient economic system, but I think it’s better described as a pathology than an economic system.

So I’ll keep moving seemingly immovable individuals beyond their comfort points. I’ll inject empathy, therefore resistance, into a sociopathic culture largely devoid of people willing to stand in opposition to the omnicidal mainstream. I’ll move individuals beyond dark thoughts and into the light of a new world. I’ll move them beyond inaction. I’ll move them beyond the oppression of industrial civilization and into the brave new world of a life that gives as well as taking.

When we fall into the abyss, first as individuals and then as a species, I’ll point out the absurdities of the way we live. Until I can’t, and we don’t.


.

Starting down - seven deadly sins

SUBHEAD: Our capitalist culture values growth and wealth above all. It is time to reset our values as we start down in descent.

By Mary Logan on 13 January 2013 for A Prosperous Way Down -
(http://prosperouswaydown.com/starting-down-seven-sins/)


Image above:A young women knits as her cat stalks the ball of yarn. By Frederick Walker (1840-1875), The Old Farm Garden, 1871, Watercolor and gouache on graphite on paper. From (http://arttattler.com/archivevictorianwatercoloursdrawings.html).

“For last year’s words belong to last year’s language and next year’s words await another voice.” ― T.S. Eliot

“Your beliefs become your thoughts,
Your thoughts become your words,
Your words become your actions,
Your actions become your habits,
Your habits become your values,
Your values become your destiny.

― Mahatma Gandhi

“I have always thought the actions of men the best interpreters of their thoughts.”
― John Locke

“I am not imposed upon by fine words; I can see what actions mean.”
― George Eliot
For those of us who live in countries where we use many fossil fuels, we have been shielded from the consequences of living badly. But that age is ending. Now that the Mayan Baktun 13 calendar has passed, we begin the era of the Gaian calendar. We “will eventually have to reduce either our populations or our living standards (emergy use) by 80 to 90 percent” (Odum & Odum, 2001, p. 170).

And as the years go by, adaptation will become harder and harder, as the surplus energy available for the tasks wanes. There are policies for a prosperous way down, but I know that when I mention the word policy to my students, their eyes glaze over. Since we are approaching the new year and a new era, I will approach the idea of personal action by framing actions in the form of Gandhi’s Seven Deadly Sins.

Our capitalist culture values growth and wealth above all. It is time to reset our values as we start down in descent. This is a challenge to those of you who are still sitting on your hands when it comes to sustainable, local living. What are you waiting for? Consider Gandhi’s 7 Sins; how many of these are you guilty of, and how can your form personal resolutions that reframe these sins in descent?
  • Wealth without Work
  • Pleasure without Conscience
  • Science without Humanity
  • Knowledge without Character
  • Politics without Principle
  • Commerce without Morality
  • Worship without Sacrifice
Take stock of your situation, and try some of these potential New Years resolutions on for size.

Wealth without work

A future with less energy will mean less opulent wealth and waste, and less disparity between the haves and the have-nots. Egregious displays of wealth and income disparity will disappear as more people fall out of the middle class. There will be less support in society for wealth without work that contributes to the community prosperity. Fascination with stock markets, ostentatious houses, cars, and other expensive status symbols will wane. If you now depend on a high income to service extensive debt, you might consider paying off the debt, avoid incurring more debt, and accustoming yourself to a lower level of income. We can assume that taxes will be higher in the future, and the pursuit of wealth may be replaced by societal goals that are more in keeping with a society in descent.

If you are working in the financial or insurance industry, consider whether a career change to a local, sustainable business would help you and your community. Is what you do a useful service to the communities of the future?expectations based on the idea that business will go ahead as usual?

If you are counting on a corporate (or other) pension in the long run, don’t. Don’t count on forms of insurance such as long-term care or life insurance, as most insurance companies assets are heavily invested in derivatives. Start building a buffer of savings so that you could support yourself without working for a while. This is the year to get out of debt, get your financial house in order, and get used to living more frugally on a smaller income.

How we store wealth will need to change in descent. At some point there will probably be a sharp devaluation of our currencies, if history is a guide. What would happen if you woke up one morning and your savings were suddenly worth half of what they were the night before? Consider what is real wealth in a future with less fossil fuels.

Pleasure without Conscience


Sometimes what is easy in the short-term can be bad for us over the longer term. Is your decision-making based on short-term thinking? Just because what you are doing now works does not mean that it will work in the future as descent becomes sharper. There will be less debt-based commerce in the future, as current systems of financing begin to fail. If you are a student incurring large amounts of student loan debt in an expensive university, consider whether the degree that you are getting will prepare you for the jobs of the future.

In many cases, the largest, most prestigious universities are being captured by the Corporation. Much of the thinking that is going on in these schools is group-think, oriented towards promoting growth in one form or another. Consider that you may be able to get more unique views and a cheaper education with less debt through smaller, local universities.
Science without Humanity

If you’re a scientist, consider the problems that you are working on. Are you asking the questions that we need to answer to adapt? Or has your focus narrowed to the questions that are suitable to a global economy bent on resource extraction for maximum growth? Examples of scientists caught in the profit machine are nuclear engineers who pitch nuclear power plants as the future. Or nanotechnology. Or GMO foods.

f we can make a buck, get a grant, or write a paper out of the advancement of technology, then by golly, we’re going to do it. Are you a cog in the wheel that keeps churning to produce growth? Are scientists allowed to profess (or even have) values? If so, what are yours? What happens when science becomes valueless? Are you a pawn of the corporation?

Science without Humanity

If you’re a scientist, consider the problems that you are working on. Are you asking the questions that we need to answer to adapt? Or has your focus narrowed to the questions that are suitable to a global economy bent on resource extraction for maximum growth? Examples of scientists caught in the profit machine are nuclear engineers who pitch nuclear power plants as the future.

Or nanotechnology. Or GMO foods. If we can make a buck, get a grant, or write a paper out of the advancement of technology, then by golly, we’re going to do it. Are you a cog in the wheel that keeps churning to produce growth? Are scientists allowed to profess (or even have) values? If so, what are yours? What happens when science becomes valueless? Are you a pawn of the corporation?

Knowledge without character

Our future will have less high-tech rescue health care, and health care will be very expensive. Take care of yourself. Begin by getting yourself and your close relationships in shape. If there was an oil shock, could you ride a bike to work and to a market? Would you have enough gear and food/water to camp out in your house if the power went out, shipments stopped, or there was an epidemic, and could you stay warm enough or cool enough?

Pollution from various sources will add to the weakening of both personal and overall population immunity. Personal health may become more tenuous at the same time that the healthcare system begins to fail. In a crisis, our healthcare system would be quickly overwhelmed. Drug shortages are already occurring, and pharmaceutical companies are showing signs of strain. If you are dependent on sleeping pills, pain medications, or other unnecessary medications that create drug tolerance or addiction, wean yourself from them. Don’t count on the healthcare system in a crisis; it would be overwhelmed quickly.

Do you know how to grow some basic vegetables to subsidize your pantry, if imported food becomes untrustworthy or unavailable? Those days are coming, and the learning curve on growing food and the process of enriching your soil take time. We have forsaken the natural energies of nature in favor of potatoes made of oil. In a future with less energy, we need to rediscover nature’s renewable energies at a personal level. Begin thinking about the energy that goes into everything we use. Is the emergy basis of your food, or your job, or your doctor’s office based on renewable energies or unsustainable, vulnerable non-renewables? Consider your personal emergy signature, and decide where you can move the bars in the graphs below back towards the left in your community’s processes.

Are your family relationships working? If not, fix them. If you put dysfunctional relationships under more stressors, then the family system begins to rattle apart. Are you relying on future air travel to connect with extended family? Consider that air travel may become more restricted, through cost, contraction of the industry, travel restrictions, and other turmoil. Position yourself so that your extended family is accessible or otherwise provided for. And if you expect your long-term care insurance (or nursing homes, for that matter) to be there as you age, don’t count on that either. Long term care insurance is a waste of money; insurance is an artifact of 20th century growth economies.

Politics without Principle

How about your local relationships? Have you let the mainstream media (MSM) define your sense of community by telling you who to talk to in your community? Or does your community transcend politics, religion, race, and so on? If there is a crisis, your survival may depend on community cohesiveness, and cohesion depends on the ability to transcend ginned up ideological barriers that are whipped up by the MSM. Diversity is useful in community—if all of your friends are TV watching pencil-pushers without useful skills, consider that you might want to diversify a little. Fossil fuels have replaced our cohesive community bonds, since we can buy goods shipped from China instead of depending on others locally. We had a large solstice party this year, and efforts to reach across ideological lines resulted in a warm, friendly gathering, with many thoughts and some poetry shared around the fire pit.

Consider how reliant you are on the government. Increasingly, we will be routinely more reliant on government, and the government will have less ability to come to our aid in a crisis. There are just too many people for that. Are you dependent on the television for entertainment and news? Find some community-based forms of entertainment, and consider whether there are other, more active ways to gather information. If there are reference books that you consider essential to a lower-energy lifestyle, buy them in book format. Leave the digital library for literature that you don’t need to keep long-term.

Commerce without Morality

Although it seems to be a common mechanism for Americans coping with stress, now is not the time to go out and buy a new car if you can avoid it. Consuming more is not the answer in a contracting economy. If you’re going to buy new transportation that prepares you for a lower-energy world, buy a bike. Having said that, we just did buy a new car. Ironically, our 15-year-old Subaru died this week, and we had to go and get a new one (used Subarus are hard to come by up here).

This particular vehicle is made in Oto Gunma, Japan. I checked fallout charts against the map, and then checked the car with a geiger counter. The car is slightly hot–5 to 10 counts per minute over background in our garage. This is our future. Will contamination be one of the factors that pushes people towards relocalization through distrust of products from afar?

What about personal skills? Are you reliant on others for basic needs and repairs? Our complex, advanced society relies on many specialized, paid relationships to provide our basic needs. Consider how dependent you are on others for essential needs, and consider whether you want to add some fix-it skills to your repertoire.

Adaptation at this point becomes a matter of good sense rather than a belief system or world view. It is clear that economic hard times are upon us. Even if we expect that things will get better, doesn’t it make sense to prepare as though things might get worse? Adaptation also becomes the right thing to do, especially since there will be 7 billion of us trying to squeeze through a narrow aperture into descent.

As time goes on, making changes will become harder as resources become less available. Get your wood stove now, before you end up in a two-year queue to get one, or you can’t afford it anymore, or there are restrictions, laws, or codes that prevent you from doing what you want to do with it. The future will be more restricted, and less free.

Worship without Sacrifice

Our capitalist society no longer values frugality, efficiency, restraint, moderation, respect, or many other traditional values. The first step in retrieving these values essential to a lower-energy society is to begin translating our thoughts into actions. If you’re still here reading, and not doing anything about descent, consider why you cannot translate thoughts into action. Examine your barriers to action and how to overcome them. Using less, living simply and locally–it’s the right thing to do.
Header: Time lapse sun as seen from UAF campus on solstice, photo by Todd Paris, UAF Marketing and Communications.


.