Showing posts with label Poetry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Poetry. Show all posts

Walking on Lava

SUBHEAD: Promotion of collected writing from the Dark Mountain project by one of its editor's.

By Charlotte Du Cann on 11 September 2017 for Open Democracy -
(https://www.opendemocracy.net/transformation/charlotte-du-cann/under-volcano)


Image above: Writer and artist Robert Leaver in his performance ‘Crawling Home’ in New York. Photo by Larrey Fessenden. From original article.

On a mountain in Wales in the teeming rain, we sit in a yurt packed with people, the five of us, on hay bales, dressed in black suits and bowler hats. One of us has a pack of cards up his sleeve, another an African folktale, another a guitar and a song by Nick Drake from the 1970s.

I have oak leaves in my hatband to signify an instruction circa 600 BC from the Sibyl who once guarded the door to the Underworld in the ‘Campi Flegrei’ outside Naples.

A link to the pre-patriarchal ‘uncivilised’ world, she guides a lineage of poets to the territory under the volcano where all deep transformations take place: Virgil, Dante, T.S. Eliot, Mary Shelley, Sylvia Plath. Denied immortal youth by the autocratic Apollo, her desiccated body kept in a jar, only her voice is still left for us to follow.

One of us, Dougie, stands up and invites the audience to take part in a demonstration of two figures from the ancient world: one is Chronos, the inexorable march of linear time; the other is a young man with a lock of hair over his forehead, who intervenes and interrupts him. His name is Kairos, and sometimes ‘Possibility.’

We’re giving a performance called ‘Testaments of Deep Time’ to introduce the work of The Dark Mountain Project—itself an intervention into the linear narrative about ecological and social calamity. As the rational world attempts to control the consequences of its dominant storyline, cracks have begun to appear.

Through those cracks, archaic, indigenous knowledge, hidden for safekeeping against Roman and other empires, slips through, and fleeting glimpses of another future reveals itself.

This encounter, we know, is what changes everything.

Dark Mountain was launched in 2009 to challenge the contemporary lack of response by culture makers to ecological overshoot in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. Its manifesto was called simply Uncivilisation.

Many people picked up this gauntlet, recognising it, not as a challenge to a duel but as an invitation to explore a territory yet unmapped.

This invitation has led to collaborations with writers, musicians and artists; 12 books and five festivals; a year-long theatre workshop in Sweden; teaching encounters in the mountains of Spain and the moors of the West Country; and performances built around the celebrations of the solar year by the River Thames and the ancestral wilderness of Scotland—and now in Wales.

What distinguishes Dark Mountain from grassroots Earth-defending organisations and progressive movements is that it is a creative response to prevailing crises—and lacks an evangelical agenda to fix them.

The project’s manifesto can act as a frame, but there is no drive to act in the space that frame creates—no pressure to shut down power stations or convince your neighbour to stop flying, or your community to reduce its carbon emissions.

Instead, it provides a space that has room and time in it, where the 24/7 broadcast of progress can be switched off and other voices apart from the mainstream can be heard; it gives an opportunity to look at things differently, and for other slower realisations to occur—for interactions, connections and deep thought as a reader, listener or contributor.

‘Are you against environmental activism?’ I was asked recently by a television researcher. ‘No,’ I said ‘We’re not against anything. It’s a conversation not an argument. We’re a creative network.’
‘If this manifesto has travelled further than we imagined, one explanation is that it has helped people to get their bearings in a world where the thin, shiny surface of prosperity has cracked. Trying to make sense of our own experience it seems that we put words to a feeling that others shared... a feeling that there is no way through the mess we find ourselves that doesn’t involve facing the darkness, and being honest about the scale of the unravelling that is under way, and the uncertainty as to where it will end. A feeling that it is time to look down.’  Dougald Hine from the Introduction to the 2014 edition of Uncivilisation.
This rallying point, the agreement to ‘look down’ and acknowledge that we sit on a crater’s edge rather than a firm foundation, not only creates a different literature but also nurtures a very different feeling towards that literature and those who write it.

If there is one shared response to the contacts made by people towards the project it is the sense of relief and comradeship in a world where a possible eruption of the status quo is manifestly denied.

However there is no mantra or belief system to take refuge in here. Dark Mountain is a collective work-in-progress, initiated by ‘recovering journalists’ disillusioned by the green movement and its timid approaches toward change.

It doesn’t offer a road map for a sustainable future but can offer you a place by the fire, an opportunity to dig beneath the distracting surface of industrial late capitalism; to produce work that asks the question, ‘how can we reclaim the voice and body of ourselves that has been suppressed by civilisation for millennia. The deadline is never far away.

The fact is we all know that “the boat is leaking and the captain lied” as Leonard Cohen once sang; we know the statistics about climate change and acidified oceans and decapitated mountains. The news that the numbers of kittiwakes on St Kilda have plummeted or that the ancient trees of Sheffield have been felled pains us. We don’t numb out that pain, nor do we indulge it in the see-saw of hope and despair.

We know the Earth is not an abstract concept of environment or ‘nature’ and requires a very different relationship, one that wrests the material of life out of the hands of the ‘quants’ and economists and gives it due respect.

The question we face is always: what do you do when you know, when you allow yourself to see and feel what is shut out by the broadcast of progress? You can’t keep writing conventional love stories and detective novels, hoping that Hollywood will get in touch.

What kind of literature and art does this awareness produce? A diverse body of work that does not fit neatly into a monocultural, corporate bookshelf or gallery wall.

Inspired by the inhumanist poetry of Robinson Jeffers, its voices do not come out of a narcissistic and alienated highbrow culture, discussed by the chattering classes of Boston or London, but from a library of stones, from the desert and forest hermitage, from conversations around convivial fires.

This space is existentialist, ringed as it is by urgent questions about what kind of human being can be so numb or so dumb in the face of catastrophe; its tone is elegiac rather than triumphant.

In many ways it returns the artist and writer to their original function, as people who push the edge and keep the door of possibility open. People who embody and stand by their words, for whom those fiery brimstone fields are home.

It’s in this spirit that we’ve created a new work called Walking on Lava, taken from our first ten hardback journals as a showcase introduction. Following their shape it is made of work of contrasting voices and genres—poetry, flash fiction, essays, artworks, photography and interviews—and structured around the manifesto’s ‘Eight Principles of Uncivilisation.’

Here are Robert Leaver crawling along Broadway in New York on his hands and knees; Christos Galanis shooting a thrift store copy of the Iliad in the New Mexico desert; and Emily Laurens sweeping the brown sands of the Welsh peninsula in honour of the disappeared passenger pigeon and the millions of species now becoming extinct—testimony, encounter, protest art and praise song of a different kind.
‘I imagine the people I have seen on Broadway, and maybe the world over, feeling a weight on their backs, in their hearts and souls. Maybe this weight is the burden on modern life, the burden on being conscious in a world gone mad. Crawling seemed to be a way to maybe show compassion or solidarity, to make a metaphor of this collective burden we all share. Instead of crawling I could have curled up in a foetal position in perfectly chosen locations. But this crawl was never about surrendering. I went down and kept moving, kept pressing on as so many humans are doing every day. The idea has always been to keep on, to get through this journey, to make it home safe and sound.’ Robert Leaver – Crawling Home.
What happens when you get bitten by a squirrel, or when you return to your homeland now crawling with bulldozers and fracking trucks?

When the story you were told by your teachers and parents is broken, when the Earth makes contact with you, you may stumble upon art with a different kind of attention: a feral stew of roots and road killed pheasant in the highlands of Scotland, a dreaming woman carrying a horse in her womb in Cornwall, a meditation on graphite in the winter-wet Cumbrian hills.

Kairos, the daemon of opportunity, had a shaved head, meaning that you had to grasp the moment that faced you, for once the light-footed one had disappeared the chance to see in all-at-once-time had also gone also.

There are only so many opportunities to sense the volcano that rumbles beneath us. Rarely do we find the way to the cave where the Sibyl sits, or pay heed to those who struggle to return from the darkness of the Stygian lake.

We live, as Marshall McLuhan once noted, in a third world war of narratives, of competing controlled ways of perceiving the world, all of them hostile to people and planet. In the quiet, in the depths, in the wild places, in the struggle of our hearts, writers and artists—those who have always kept a true link to the wider, wilder world—are forging another story.

We hope that Walking on Lava will show how some of that new collective tale is unfolding.

Walking on Lava – Selected Work for Uncivilised Times is edited by Charlotte Du Cann, Dougald Hine, Nick Hunt and Paul Kingsnorth and published by Chelsea Green.

.

Capitalism and Degrowth

SUBHEAD: Beware of cultural constructs that make the status quo appear natural.

By Susan Paulson on 22 September 2016 for DeGrowth -
(http://www.degrowth.de/en/2016/09/capitalism-and-degrowth/)


Image above: Promotional graphic for poster of Budapest 2016 Degrowth Conference where Susan Paulson made this presentation. From (http://budapest.degrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/08/2016-Budapest-Degrowth-Week-Programmes.pdf?18d38a).
What is capitalism?
A kind of state?
An institution?
Some values?
A power structure?
Ideology?
A Culture?

What governs capitalism?
Supply and demand
Invisible hand
Enclosure of land
The drive to expand
Market mechanism
Class schism
Racism
The moral virtue of productivism.

Innovation!
Invest!
Impress!
Progress!
Entrepreneurial quest for
Technological success in
Pursuit of profit.

Laissez faire!
Free market
Free trade
Free enterprise
Freedom to buy
Wage slavery
And debt.

Individual self-interest!
Ambition
Addiction
Friction
Cut throat competition
Eat or be eaten
Grow or die.

I think about capitalism as a moment. A blink in time. Organic life has thrived on earth for four billion years. Modern humans have been walking around for some 200,000 years, looking a lot like you and me. That magical moment of capitalism dawned just 500 hundred years ago with European colonial expansion that enabled the rise of fossil-fueled industrial economies.

Vital to that rise are hierarchical systems of class, gender and race that interact with markets to engineer—and to justify—unequal exchange .Those who engage in markets from superior positions get more for their money. Ecological value flows toward them and wealth accumulates.

Those who sell labor and other resources from inferior positions tend to get drained. Degraded. Deforested. Eroded. Impoverished. Exhausted.

Net cultural exchange has flowed in the other direction: capitalist practices, values and myths have been impelled far and wide, with scant return of other traditions. Cultural features of capitalism now seem so omnipresent that it is difficult to imagine and to forge alternatives.

The most ingenious maneuver of modernity is to propagate the perception that this moment fills all horizons. As a result, political left and right, pro-growth and degrowth, slug it out in a confined capitalocentric arena.

The biggest challenge faced by degrowth is the shallow historical depth and narrow cultural scope that circumscribe contemporary debates. How to break out?

(1) Debunk myths that naturalize features of capitalism, (2) learn from all kinds of socionatural worlds, (3) forge systems driven by desires other than growth.
Degrowth is denounced as ecofascism:ideologically-driven imposition that would force unwilling victims to sacrifice their God-given freedoms and betray innate self-interests. Capitalism, in contrast, is perceived as apolitical and morally neutral; markets, in particular, appear as timeless mechanisms through which all humans freely organize livelihoods and establish value. Karl Polanyi (1944) showed they are anything but.

The commodification of labor and nature, together with the colonization of human practice and worldview by market-relations and money-value, are historical exceptions brutally imposed in 18th and 19th century Britain in efforts to “mold human nature” for industrial growth.

Moving to late 20th century, David Harvey (2007) and others have exposed the formidable political incursions enacted to force expansion of “free” market relations into the most isolated parts of the world and the most intimate realms of human intercourse.

Our stubborn blindness to these and other historical details is enabled by certain architectural features of Western language, science and philosophy, notably: hierarchical binaries.

Binaries of white over non-white, man over woman, human over other nature are engraved in the world in ways that make it difficult to question unequal exchange and exploitation, even from the position of those most exploited.

The nature-culture binary marks thinking humans as superior over instinct-driven beasts; it also cements as “natural instinct” (therefore unchangeable) those aspects of human life that should not be questioned.

Today, the conviction that human biology is responsible for the insatiable drive to increase production and consumption is fostered by powerful cultural and scientific narratives.

Featured myths include Homo economicus, the innately rational agent who always maximizes utility for personal gain; Adam Smith’s “natural propensity” to truck and barter, and that selfish gene that makes each of us crave control over resources and strive to take more than our share, condemning to tragedy any attempts at commons management.

Even the Anthropocene is portrayed as a result of human evolution! Teleological narratives surrounding climate change are exemplified by Steffen, Crutzen and McNeill (2007, 614) who write: “the first use of fire by our bipedal ancestors, belonging to the genus Homo erectus, occurred a couple of million years ago.”

And“The mastery of fire by our ancestors provided humankind with a powerful monopolistic tool unavailable to other species, that put us firmly on the long path towards the Anthropocene.”

As Malm and Holmberg (2014, 65) point out, just as the power to shape planetary climate passes from nature into the realm of humans, it is re-naturalized as innate “human nature.”

Beware of cultural constructs that make the status quo appear natural.

Antonio Gramsci (1971) taught us to beware the power of cultural constructs that make the status quo appear natural and inevitable. He also noted that historical crises can destabilize that power, opening transformative possibilities. Let’s seize this opportunity to shake up those myths. 

Learning from all kinds of socio-natural worlds expands our historical depth and cultural breadth. Archeological and ethnographic studies demonstrate that diverse hunter-gatherer-fisher cultures with extremely low societal metabolism and little or no market activity have thrived throughout human history and still today. Certainly they’ve impacted and co-constructed ecosystems in many ways– but there’s no sign of them changing the course of earth systems.

Evidence points to gradual expansion in per capita societal metabolism in some populations, starting around 10,000 years ago with the dawn of agriculture and urbanism, followed by much steeper increases just a few hundred years ago with the moment of capitalism, then a miraculous erection of supercharged growth in the late twentieth century, accompanied by skyrocketing atmospheric concentration of CO2.

Putting that latter moment in deeper historical and broader cultural context reveals the absurdity of claims that the ability to make fire (evolved two million years ago) inexorably led to human destruction of earth systems in the mid 20th century, when Geologists mark the beginning of the Anthropocene.

It also challenges the common message that this new era was provoked by humanity as a whole (rather than a minority group or social system).

Cross cultural awareness can help us answer questions like: “How can humanity progress without capitalist motivation?” And, “How can non-expanding economies even sustain human society?” I’ve been learning with a network of scholar-activists working in 15 countries with communities trying to thrive equitably with low or decreasing societal metabolism.

Some of the countries boast booming economic and material growth, others face postgrowth, or having missed out on growth altogether.

Whereas many participants in this conference promote degrowth as a purposeful project, we also pay attention to degrowth as an unintended consequence, not necessarily welcomed, and not always recognized as a consequence of growth elsewhere.

We find promising practices and meanings in long-sustained arrangements, among forced adaptations, and amid innovations toward new visions. You can learn about these diverse cultural paths in a forthcoming issue of the Journal of Political Ecology on Degrowth, Culture and Power.

The purpose of these studies is not to promote a return to primitive life or third world conditions. On the contrary, awareness of many possible modes of human existence widens horizons for building unprecedented futures. We turn now to the furnace where those futures are forged.

We’ve made clear that behaviors and values that drive capitalist growth are not natural; they are artifacts of recent systems of culture and power. But there is something about human biology that is relevant here.

Creatures interacting in the earth’s ecosystems display amazing characteristics evolved to meet their needs and to assure their descendants’ survival. Spotted salamanders use solar power, Atlantic wolf fish manufactures antifreeze, and African dung beetles navigate with the Milky Way.

Cacti grow spines to defend their juicy stems against succulent-eaters, and nettles puncture predators (and passers-by), injecting poison into their wounds. Relative to those of other creatures, human bodies do not shine as particularly strong, quick or tough.

What does stand out is a biophysical capacity for symbolic thought and communication that enables usto collaboratively develop cultural systems that survive the individual organism and, in turn, shape the production of new generations of Homo sapiens, their habits, and their habitats.

These uniquely human systems take the form of languages, religions, and sciences; production, kinship and gender systems. They are our most fundamental commons. That is where the growth imperative came from, and that is what we are already changing to support equitable and pleasurable degrowth.


Video above: Evening plenary - "Capitalism and Degrowth" presentation by Susan Paulson (left). From (https://youtu.be/dbZRTsH81-k).

This presentation was part of the plenary session “Capitalism and Degrowth“. Watch this conference session on our YouTube Channel

Literature:

Gramsci, A. 1971.Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.

Harvey, D. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Malm, A. and A. Hornborg. 2014.The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review 1(1): 62-69.

Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.

Steffen W, Crutzen PJ and McNeill JR (2007) The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio36: 614–621.

• Susan Paulson spent many years in Latin America, researching and teaching about ways in which gender, class and ethnoracial systems interact with biophysical environments, influencing the development of bodies, landscapes and ecosystems (including humans). Books she has written/edited include Masculinities and Femininities in Latin America’s Uneven Development (Routledge 2015), After living and working for more than 20 years outside her home country of USA, she joined the University of Florida Center for Latin American Studies in 2014.

.

Landspeak

SUBHEAD: Words which do not simply label a place but in some mysterious and beautiful way become part of it.

By Robert Macfarlane on 15 May 2015 for Orion Magazine -
(https://orionmagazine.org/article/landspeak/)


Image above: The Hawaiian language is rich with place names; all with multiple meanings. "Puu" is a Hawaiian word for a conical land formation of a volcano that also implies a throat or pump (http://www.wehewehe.org). Pictured here (from GoogleEarth) is a "Puu" in Koloa, Kauai, Hawaii named Puuhi, where the ahupuaa (districts) of Weliweli, Paa and Mahaulepu join.  Puu formations are often places where Hawaiians districts meet and are sometimes locations where water can be distributed from one district to another. Puuhi became a reservoir for the first sugarcane plantation in Hawaii. In the distance is the site of the Koloa Sugar Mill.  When "Puu" is combined with the word "Wai", as in the word "Puuwai", they create the word for "heart". "Wai"  means fresh water (or any organic fluid not from salt water; such as honey, sap, semen or blood). The only "town" on the Hawaiian island of Niihau is called Puuwai (or Heart). It is the only place in Hawaii where all the residence speak the language. 

For over a decade I have been collecting place-words: gleaned singly from conversations, correspondences, or books, and jotted down in journals or on slips of paper. Now and then I have hit buried treasure in the form of vernacular dictionaries or extraordinary people—troves that have held gleaming handfuls of coinages.

One such trove turned up on the moors of the Outer Hebridean island of Lewis in 2007. There, I was shown a “Peat Glossary”: a word-list of the hundreds of Gaelic terms for the moorland that stretches over much of Lewis’s interior. Some of the language it recorded was still spoken—but much had fallen into disuse.

The same year I first saw the Peat Glossary, a new edition of the Oxford Junior Dictionary was published. A sharp-eyed reader noticed that there had been a culling of words concerning nature. Under pressure, Oxford University Press revealed a list of the entries it no longer felt to be relevant to a modern-day childhood.

The deletions included acorn, adder, ash, beech, bluebell, buttercup, catkin, conker, cowslip, cygnet, dandelion, fern, hazel, heather, heron, ivy, kingfisher, lark, mistletoe, nectar, newt, otter, pasture, and willow.

The words introduced to the new edition included attachment, block-graph, blog, broadband, bullet-point, celebrity, chatroom, committee, cut-and-paste, MP3 player, and voice-mail.

The substitutions made in the dictionary—the outdoor and the natural being displaced by the indoor and the virtual—are a small but significant symptom of the simulated life we increasingly live. Children are now (and valuably) adept ecologists of the technoscape, with numerous terms for file types but few for differ-ent trees and creatures.

A basic literacy of landscape is falling away up and down the ages. And what is lost along with this literacy is something precious: a kind of word magic, the power that certain terms possess to enchant our relations with nature and place.

As the writer Henry Porter observed, the OUP deletions removed the “euphonious vocabulary of the natural world—words which do not simply label an object or action but in some mysterious and beautiful way become part of it.”

Consider ammil, a Devon term meaning “the sparkle of morning sunlight through hoar-frost,” a beautifully exact word for a fugitive phenomenon I have several times seen but never before been able to name. Shetlandic has a word, pirr, meaning “a light breath of wind, such as will make a cat’s paw on the water”; and another, klett, for “a low-lying earth-fast rock on the seashore.”

On Exmoor, zwer is the onomatopoeic term for the sound made by a covey of partridges taking flight. Smeuse is a Sussex dialect noun for “the gap in the base of a hedge made by the regular passage of a small animal”; now that I know the word smeuse, I will notice these signs of creaturely movement more often.

The variant English terms for icicle—aquabob (Kent), clinkerbell and daggler (Wessex), cancervell (Exmoor), ickle (Yorkshire), tankle (Durham), shuckle (Cumbria)—form a tinkling poem of their own. Blinter is a northern Scots word meaning “a cold dazzle,” connoting especially “the radiance of winter stars on a clear night,” or “ice-splinters catching low light.”

Instantly the word opens prospects: walking sunwards through snow late on a midwinter day, with the wind shifting spindrift into the air such that the ice-dust acts as a prismatic mist, refracting sunshine into its pale and separate colors; or out on a crisp November night in a city garden, with the lit windows of houses and the orange glow of street light around, while the stars blinter above in the cold high air.

I would not have guessed at the existence of quite so many terms for animal dung, from crottle (a foresters’ term for hare excrement) to doofers (Scots for horse shit) to the expressive ujller (Shetlandic for the “unctuous filth that runs from a dunghill”) and turdstool (West Country for a very substantial cowpat).

Nor did I know that a dialect name for the kestrel, alongside such felicities as windhover and bell-hawk, is wind-fucker. Once learnt, never forgotten—it is hard now not to see in the pose of the hovering kestrel a certain lustful quiver.

In The History of the Countryside, the great botanist Oliver Rackham describes four ways in which “landscape is lost”: through the loss of beauty, the loss of freedom, the loss of wildlife and vegetation, and the loss of meaning. I admire the way that aesthetics, human experience, ecology, and semantics are given parity in his list. Of these losses the last is hardest to measure.

I do not, of course, believe that such words will magically summon us into a pure realm of harmony and communion with nature. Rather that they might offer a vocabulary that is “convivial” as the philosopher Ivan Illich intended the word—meaning enriching of life, stimulating to the imagination, and “encouraging creative relations between people, and people and nature.”

And, perhaps, that the vibrancy of perception evoked in these glossaries may irrigate the dry metalanguages of modern policymaking (the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, for instance, offers such tautological aridities as “Land use: the use to which a piece of land is put”).

For there is no single mountain language, but a range of mountain languages; no one coastal language, but a fractal of coastal languages; no lone tree language, but a forest of tree languages.

As I have traveled, I have come to under­stand that although place-words are being lost, they are also being ­created. I met a painter in the Hebrides who used landskein to refer to the braid of blue horizon lines in hill country on a hazy day; and a five-year-old girl who concocted honeyfur to describe the soft seeds of grasses held in the fingers.

John Constable invented the verb to sky, meaning “to lie on one’s back and study the clouds.” We have forgotten ten thousand words for our landscapes, but we will make ten thousand more, given time.

Of course there are experiences of landscape that will always resist articulation, and of which words offer only a remote echo—or to which silence is by far the best response. Nature does not name itself.

Granite does not self-identify as igneous. Light has no grammar. Language is always late for its subject. Sometimes on the top of a mountain I just say, “Wow.”

• Robert Macfarlane lives in Cambridge and is author of The Wild Places and The Old Ways. The text that appears here is adapted from his book Landmarks, forthcoming from Trafalgar in
.

The Age of Endings

SUBHEAD: Our myths of progress are killing us. Perhaps only poetry can save us now.

By Paul Kingsnorth on 7 August 2013 for Open Democracy -
(http://www.opendemocracy.net/transformation/paul-kingsnorth/age-of-endings)


Image above: A photo once taken on the Great Barrier Reef on planet Earth. From (http://www.oceanwideimages.com/categories.asp?cID=233).

Where can we find a new set of stories to inspire the work of the future? Only through the creative imagination of writers, artists, storytellers and musicians. Perhaps only poetry can save us now.

If I were a scientist, I might say we were living in an age of entropy. But I’m not a scientist, and I tend to think that using language of science to discuss issues outside of its domain is part of our current complex of cultural problems. So perhaps, instead, we could call this an age of endings.

Wherever you choose to look, old certainties and old realities appear to be dissolving. The Earth as we know it: its great forests, reefs, teeming cod banks and ancient glaciers. The tigers, the whales, the butterflies and the mountain gorillas. Whole species, at a higher rate of extinction than for millions of years. This planet’s 10,000 year old climatic era. Endings.

Human endings too: the great paintbox of human languages, with most scheduled to die out by century’s end, and ways of living and being that developed over centuries in response to local circumstances. Family life. Traditions. Local economic networks. Cultural certainties. Nations themselves. Known ways of living. Endings.

In some ways, this is not new. At any period of time we could have looked around us and seen empires collapsing and ways of living passing into history. But this is not the same. Never before have we – humans – altered the planet’s climate or pushed so many species into extinction that we may have already triggered a sixth mass extinction event. We have never seen such social and ecological loss on such a wide scale, across the entire globe before, and so fast.

All of these changes are caused by one phenomenon: a burgeoning human economy that serves a global consumer society in which desire poses as need and all needs are there to be met. Blame who you like for this situation: blame the sixties, blame the eighties, blame science, blame the Enlightenment, blame Thatcher or Marx or capitalism or feminism. Blame climate deniers or oil companies or people who take cheap flights or loggers or the owners of battery chicken farms. Blame population growth or greed or politics or technology. Blame yourself, or everyone else – it doesn’t really matter. The age of endings, the age of acceleration, is at hand, and each of us is strung out in its web.

What does it mean to live through times like these, and what should be done to make sense of them? If your children will be poorer than you were, their world scarred and deprived of much of its beauty and magic, what questions should we be asking about what human progress has come to mean?

Questions, I think, are the key. We need to be interrogating our stories deeply: the myths that underpin who we are and how we see the world. In the loosest sense of the word, we live in a materialist society. We pay attention to the material, the measurable, above all else, and we have a tendency to dismiss or ignore aspects of life which are equally real but not as easily reduced to a column on a spreadsheet.


Image above: A typical dying coral reef in Hawaii facing unknown infection in 2012. From (http://news.discovery.com/earth/oceans/hawaiian-corals-dying-from-mysterious-infection-121204.htm).

This means that when we ask ourselves how this global suite of potential disasters has arisen, we tend to look at the outer rather than the inner manifestations. We tell ourselves that the problem is technological: that we are producing too many greenhouse gases because we are burning fossil fuels, and therefore we need to stop burning them. Or we tell ourselves that the problem is political: democracy cannot respond adequately to the needs of ecology, so we need a new political system. Or perhaps the problem is structural: governments cannot reach agreement on necessary measures to tackle global problems, and corporations are too powerful and should be purged from the political system.

All of these things may well be true, but I would suggest that our culture has an inner problem as well as an outer one: our stories are malfunctioning. All cultures, all civilisations, are built on stories. The things they believe about themselves and their place in the world, and how that world works, are integral to how people behave, how institutions operate and how humans in that society relate to the nonhuman world. If you want to understand any culture, look at its myths.

What are our myths, here in the “Enlightened West?” Probably the most potent is the story of progress: that we used to be savages and now are civilised; used to be superstitious and now are rational; used to be primitive and now are advanced; used to be stupid and now are clever, and will continue to move in this direction bar the odd blip as we colonise the stars. This is the Genesis tale of modernity. Progress has become our civil religion: widespread, largely unquestioned, seeping into every intellectual crack. God is dead, and now the real paradise awaits. Except as before, it always remains just out of reach.

The myth of progress is encircled by a set of what we might call sub-myths: the ability to access truth through objective science; a faith in advanced technology; the assumption of reason’s superiority over intuition; and a belief in the supremacy of the human species over the rest of life (or, as we tend to call it, ‘our environment’: note the possessive ‘our’).

These are our stories. Now they are killing us – and not just us. The age of endings is a product of misplaced beliefs, of myths gone bad. Now our task is to think about different stories: to create new ones or disinter some old ones and begin telling them again.

Four years ago, I founded a network of writers and artists called the Dark Mountain Project with the explicit purpose of beginning this work. Since then, we’ve produced a number of books and held a series of public events aimed at interrogating our cultural stories and beginning to approach the creation of new ones. One of the first questions we have asked is: what might be some of the foundational stories of a new narrative?

My first response is that the myth of progress needs to be comprehensively debunked through some serious study of history and prehistory. I would say that science and economics need to be put in their place: an important place, but one which sees them as servants of our society rather than as its narrative masters. I would say that reason should be balanced with intuition; mythos with logos. Perhaps most importantly I would say that without what has been called an ecocentric perspective – a worldview which sees humans as one form of life among many, rather than as the pinnacle of evolution and the master of all – nothing very much will change.

If this is true, I would suggest that the work of change is too important to be left to scientists, political activists, politicians and economists. Their roles are important, to be sure, but the narratives that underpin their work are unlikely to be questioned from within. Rewriting stories is the task of the creative imagination, which means it is the task of writers, artists, storytellers, musicians and all who would regard themselves as workers of and with the imagination. Perhaps only poetry can save us now.

.

Fuck Obama and the NSA!

SUBHEAD: A poem for Lisaʻs Birthday! With Dancing Monkeys!

By Jonanthan Jay on 11 June 2013 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2013/06/fuck-obama-and-nsa.html)


Image above: Dancing Monkeys at the 21010 Bay to Breakers festival. From (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dancing_Monkeys_Bay_to_Breakers.jpg).

(fuck Obama and the NSA)
In the telling
of the tale
she SOLD IT
in colors so
BRAZEN
you wanted to
HOLD IT
just inches away
from your heart
& MOLD IT
by the heat
of lifeʻs
PASSION
and the torsion
THAT ROLLED IT.
So naturally...

As the pages
of her book
were still
TURNING
and vermillion flames
of the empire
BURNING
there unleashed such
terrific and evolute
LEARNING
a tremendous bonfire
of galactic YEARNING
that all the bullshit
washed AWAY...
and all the monkeys
came out to PLAY.
HURRAY!
Fuck Obama and the NSA!

.

The Farmer & the Fisherman

SUBHEAD: There is a connection between the lives of those who make their living dependent on the land and those on the sea.

By Dyan Redick on 27 March 2013 for Home Grown -
(http://homegrown.org/blog/2013/03/homegrown-life-farmers-and-fishermen/)


Image above: Farmhouse by the sea in Maine. "Night Sleeper" by Jamie Wyeth, 1979, tempura on panel. From (http://www.andrewwyeth.com/index.html).

Sometimes I wonder how things would be different if I had decided to start a farm in another part of Maine, away from the coast. But then I wake up after another night of waiting for goat babes to arrive and am graced with the remnants of wintertime. I take my coffee to sip outside on a cold granite bench engraved with a memory, and there I’m calmed by the seas and the sun, which definitely has risen by now. The surf is pounding, crashing over the rocks, and I can feel the sea spray floating through the air. It’s all so soothing and beautiful.

Living in a fishing village, I am surrounded by men and women who, like me, spend their lives wading in muck—only theirs is generated by fresh catches rather than by some breed of domesticated beast. Their days are filled with backbreaking work, lifting heavy traps full of prized crustaceans rather than bales of fresh local-cut hay. They haul nets laden with fish or shrimp rather than bucketloads of grain or water. They slog around in muck boots and Grundens rather than Carhartt’s and, well, muck boots. Farmers layer their Carhartt’s over a barn sweater so full of holes you wonder how it has any warming effect left. 

Fishermen cover their sweaters, made of sturdy Maine-grown wool full of “grease” to shed the sea spray, under waterproof bibs.

A fisherman’s life is guided by the pounding sea and its ever-changing highs and lows. A monument in my town of Port Clyde attests to lives lost while incurring her wrath or as the result of something gone terribly wrong. Farmers, too, have endured tragic loss from accidents and hardships. Our local St. George and Oceanview Granges stand as monuments to those who have gone before us, tilling the soil, tending flocks and herds, gathering up the harvest in the fall.

The lives of farmers and fishermen are inextricably interwoven.

Mother Nature plays the largest role in whether a fisherman is successful in his catches, much to the consternation of the scientists who try and sort out patterns of aquatic life. So it is with the farmer, who basically hopes and prays that this season won’t bring floods or winds or drought or bugs or fungus or disease while the Cooperative Extension Agency wrestles with Mother Nature’s latest invention.

For fishermen, inspiration comes in the form of an early morning sunrise over the bow of the boat while steaming out for the day’s catch. Likewise, the gentle stirring of warm fuzzy bodies bedded down in soft clean hay that’s brought on by the flick of a light switch nudges a farmer through one more day. Stamina to get up long before dawn’s early light, stamina to push through pain from aching muscles and tired bones, stamina to haul a trap or a net brimming with a prized catch, or buckets of water through waist-deep snow.

Making a life, not just a living, in harmony with the change of seasons and taking each day as it comes, whether on dry ground or on water.

There’s a rhythm to it all. When I lived on the Chesapeake Bay, I would wake every morning at 3 a.m. when my neighbor on one side, Skipper, started his truck for the ride down to his boat, then again at 4 a.m. when Michael, the neighbor on the other side, followed. I’d lie there smiling with the day already starting in sync and then thankfully roll back over to dream of lambs and chickens and goats.

I once asked Michael what he would do if he couldn’t work the water on what had been his father’s old boat anymore. He just shook his head. As it turned out, he ended up selling the boat rather than sinking it and worked the rest of his short 46 years as a carpenter—a job that kept him firmly on the ground he had loved leaving behind every morning as a fisherman. Times have changed for fishermen and farmers both.

For me, there is a connection between the lives of those who make their living dependent on the land and those on the sea. I don’t think I could have been as happy as a farmer if my life wasn’t graced by waking to the sunrise over water. The thread of hardship, joy, and satisfaction binds farmer and fisherman together.

As the tides in the harbor rise and fall, so do the days unfold as I move from chore to chore. I am as dependent on this guarantee as I am on taking my next breath. I pick up my mail each day in my muck-covered boots at the Port Clyde Post Office, where I’m followed through the door by a fisherman fuming with the distinct odor of bait traps. It’s a blending of aromas, strengths, weaknesses, smiles, daily inspirations, and lives.

I love the strength of mountains, but I’m glad to be building this farm by the sea.

• Dyan Redick describes herself as “an accidental farmer with a purpose.” Her farm, located on the St. George peninsula of Maine, is a certified Maine State Dairy offering cheeses made with milk from a registered Saanen goat herd, a seasonal farm stand full of wool from a Romney cross flock, goat milk soap, lavender, woolens, and whatever else strikes Dyan’s fancy. Bittersweet Heritage Farm is an extension of her belief that we should all gain a better understanding of our food source, our connection to where we live, and to the animals with whom we share the earth.

.

The darkness around is deep

SUBHEAD: Thoughts on the Spring Equinox concerning our place in this changing and damaged world.

By Charlotte Du Cann on 20 March 2013 for Transition Network -
(https://www.transitionnetwork.org/stories/charlotte-du-cann/2013-03/darkness-around-us-deep)


Image above: Illustration of Spring Equinox by Nina Ulana. From (http://bagladythoughts.blogspot.com/2011/03/spring-equinoxtime-for-renewal.html).

I am walking towards the statue of Peter Pan. It is a cold grey winter's day in a winter that seems to go on forever. I have followed this path since I was six weeks old, when my parents brought me here to see the bronze statue of the Boy Who Wouldn’t Grow Up, the animals playing at his feet and the waterbirds on the Serpentine.

I don’t live in London anymore and it must have been years now since I walked past these stone fountains at Lancaster Gate. My parents ashes are scattered among the horse chestnut trees at the water’s edge and I have come to touch base in a hard winter, when it seems my world has come to a grinding halt. Your parents can give you good reasons for being here, so long as you don’t get waylaid by happy family stories and too much psychology.

My father was a lawyer but he dreamed of being a traveling writer, my mother was a secretary and a wife, but dreamed of being an artist and living in a community. I have lived out their dreams.

As a consequence I have also gone contrary to the bourgeois creed in which I was raised, betraying my Kensington Gardens upbringing, my class, education and everything about this city that was once my home.

Sometimes you could think I had betrayed my parents too.

But at a certain depth - the kind of depth that makes sense of everything, even a hard winter, when you lose the capacity to write and have three bouts of flu back to back - you know that following the party line is not what you are doing on the planet at this point in time.

Walking away from the party and putting down roots in the real earth is what you are doing, living like a creator, even though it condemns you to skirt like a fox on the edges of everything.

I can write this because when I walked down to the statue that day I saw a heron waiting on the dead poplar tree and I heard a mistle thrush singing in the undergrowth. The fishing bird that was my father and the singing bird that was my mother. It was one of those moments where the mystery of life touches you and shakes you to your core.

And as I walked across the park I saw there were birds everywhere: parakeets in amongst the London planes, a bevy of swans down by the round pond being fed by children, a crow hopping warily at my feet. And underneath the sweet chestnut trees there were ghosts of wild flowers and long meadow grass that would never have been “allowed” when I was young. This was bird London, wild London. Something coming through the cracks you do not expect.

Afterwards I went to join Lucy at the South Bank for a meeting about the book we are working on called Playing for Time. We stood on Waterloo Bridge and Lucy told me how once she organised a huge pyrotechnic show on the river; how many officials behind those grey stern facades she had to negotiate with to allow this fiery theatre to take place.

And then she took me to supper at a little Lebanese restaurant in Covent Garden before I caught my train home. Mezes and a glass of rose wine. I haven’t eaten a meal on white tablecloth for a long, long time. It was a big treat. It was a good day.
Wellbeing

I am not sure about the word wellbeing. I know about treasuring the good days. I understand destiny, living true to your solar core, aligned with the earth that gives you life. I understand honouring your mother and father, and the hard work of creators, what it takes to bring the fire through and hold it in the dark times. I understand walking out this equinox morning to greet the sun down the frosty lane with Mark.

I understand about having a warrior attitude and a medicine attention, about finding your material, undertaking the hard inner work, turning the bad karma of empire and the dross of materialism into some kind gold for the future. But well being as a measure of life?

Being at leisure, feeling comfortable, feeling OK about ourselves, like those well-serviced magazine women who do yoga, eat superfoods and find solace in novels? This feels like another kind of consumerism, a convenient barricading out of the hard facts, the reality that nothing we do in this industrialised culture is kind or good.

Everything we touch or put in our mouths requires some other being’s suffering: from people, from forests, mountains, animals, fish, children, birds. How can you have wellbeing at the expense of others, without going into denial?

I have experienced a state of happiness, a lightness and ease with the world, which comes sometimes out of the blue, like a butterfly: floating like a starfish in the sea, lying under the goat willow on a spring day and hearing the return of the bees, countless mornings in the desert when I lived there, a morning in Venezuela when we woke up and found ourselves in a tropical seatown with the whole day in front of us, a long long road in Arizona edged with sunflowers, a long long beach in California, with sealions in the surf and sanderlings running in and out.

So many mornings full of space and light and beauty when I was on the road, when I had money in my pocket and knew nothing about peak oil.

How do you have wellbeing in Transition when the moments of white tablecloths are few and the road is no longer open, and 2013 looks unaccountably harder and colder and poorer than 2012? When it has been grey for months on a damp, crowded island, and you have been in bed for weeks? How can you live well in times of unravelling, your own unravelling and the dear earth’s on which all happiness depends?

Will you be there?

Here is a moment I had in Transition: One of the most successful meetings in Transition Norwich in fact in the early days when we were setting up the Heart and Soul, Arts, Culture and Wellbeing group. It was the one and only meeting we had on wellbeing.

Among the ten people who came that evening five were working or had worked for the NHS, one was a chemist and two of us knew about medicine plants. Each of us had brought an object to introduce our medicine stories: Mark brought a horse-chestnut tincture, Richard brought a quote from The Glass Bead Game and a small volume on homoeopathy. Alex brought a daisy.

He had been at a seminar in the Schumacher Institute when the deep ecologist Arne Naess, then in his eighties, had surprised everyone as he leapt through the window with a daisy in his hands. It was the medicine of vigour, Alex said.

What made this meeting vigorous and deep was the reality we brought with us. Suddenly our discussions, which had been abstract workshop encounters, full of spiritual possibility and solace, had allowed our gritty experience of the world into the room. When some of us exchanged opinions about the modern medical system, Angie, who had been a nurse on intensive care for 19 years, said quietly:

“I hope when I need to be turned some of you will be there to turn me.”

And there was a silence in the small room. As we realised what it would mean for us to take our own health, our lives, into our own hands.

We don’t live in a never-never land. We live in a place where we are all going to die. And because all living things die on Earth, change is possible. We have physical limits and the reality of time, and against those limits and time, all our greatness and nobility is tested.

As modern people we are no longer initiated into the mysteries of life, where this kind of limit has meaning, and so to get to a realisation of our true path, we need to tap into those moments that come out of nowhere.

I understand this as making space to honour the ancestors – the ones who went before – our lineage and making time to greet the sun on an equinox day, to light a fire around which we can gather and listen to each other’s stories.

The work of the artist and the writer is to remind the people of those moments, so we do not follow the wrong god home and miss our star. So we set our sails in the right direction. The measure we have is not our personal wellbeing, it is an alignment we hold inside us that can help put a crooked thing straight.

We are the ones who carry the fire, even when it looks as if it has gone out. We know how to bury the dead, we know where the medicine plants grow, we know the meaning of dreams, we know how to speak to the officials, so a fiery show can happen on the River Thames, we recognise the bird when it sings, the warrior when he stands by the land. We honour the people who suffer themselves to undergo change, who give their gifts and do not give up.

We are in all places, in all rooms. We are Transition. We live in the towns and cities and down the lane. We are here. We are not going anywhere. Because there is nowhere else to go.

This is what we remember. This the moment that matters. Right now, right here.

.

Solstice Musings

SUBHEAD: When I read this poem, I remembered the importance of our connection to the natural world.

By Linda Pascatore on 20 December 2012 for Island Breath - 
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2012/12/solstice-musings.html)


Image above: A rural winter dawn in the North East. (http://wallpaperscraft.com/download/dawn_winter_sun_sky_gleam_morning_trees_snow_fog_frost_yard_61481)

Winter Solstice is tomorrow, December 21st.  This is the shortest day of the year, and the longest night.  At Winter Solstice, the sun has reached it's southernmost point in it's path through the sky, and then turns back.  From this day on, the nights will become shorter, and the day longer.

This has been a significant spiritual as well as astronomical point through history, especially in colder climates in the northern hemisphere.  There are many Festivals of Light, across many cultures, symbolizing the hope for warmer, more fertile times in the depth of winter.  Most Christmas traditions associated with Christianity are based on earlier Solstice celebrations.

Currently, we are in a very dark time, environmentally, politically, economically, and socially.  During this Solstice time, we can visualize and hope for the future of our world.  Rather than dwelling on the darkness and negativity, we can celebrate our hope and vision for a better future.  This future can be simpler, more connected with nature, and more sustainable.

I used to live in a climate of cold, snowy winters in Western New York.  I really appreciated the Solstice celebrations of light.  We just received a poem in a Christmas letter from our good friend in Central New York State, Kathleen Morris.  When I read this poem, I remembered the importance of the connection to the natural world, rather than our artificial construct of society.  I have always found spirit and hope in nature.  I hope you enjoy the poem:
Sacrament

Fat, chenille frost blankets all 'round:
its startling expanse rolls toward distant woods.
Each careful step my walk a violation
of the silver hush of darkness.

Into softest pink glow at the eastern rim
the liquid orange orb gains purchase
on the lip of the world, gathers its magnificence
reveals its ineffable glory.

Every twig and heave of hillside anointed.
Blessed, each bird, bug and beast
bathed deep in potent gold stands silent,
awash in awed communion.

Yet so soon, so cynically
we turn away, return to darkness.
We attend to our comforts, their limitations,
our sullen fatigue, these wounds and fears.

We pull the door closed, blankets over heads
in our ignorance, its arrogance, its greed.
Even our strivings and good intentions are mute
in the face of the day's spectacular grace.

We shutter the dawn
as if we can afford
to take it for granted.
As if our time will never end.

See also:

The Gobbler: Mele Kalikimaka 12/21/00
The Gobbler: Haleakala Solstice 12/21/00
The Gobbler: Super Solstice 12/21/99
The Gobbler: Christmas Traditions 12/21/95
The Gobbler: Seasons Greetings 12/21/95


.

Extirpation Nation

SUBHEAD: How much of the US will be habitable in 50 years? Given the track record - Not much!

By Dan Allen on 11 December 2012 for Resilience.org -
(http://www.resilience.org/stories/2012-12-10/extirpation-nation-how-much-of-the-us-will-be-habitable-in-50-years)
Definition: ex·tir·pate  (kstr-pt)
tr.v. ex·tir·pat·ed, ex·tir·pat·ing, ex·tir·pates
     1.
To pull up by the roots.
     2.
To destroy totally; exterminate.
     3.
To remove by surgery.

Image above: Cutting down big redwoods in Humbolt County, California. From (http://www.cardcow.com/343773/cutting-down-big-redwoods-humboldt-county-california/).
Human adaptation to prolonged, extreme drought is difficult or impossible. Historically, the primary adaptation to dust-bowlification has been abandonment; the very word ‘desert’ comes from the Latin desertum for ‘an abandoned place’.” –Joe Romm
 
“Adrift, drifting: what is left for the lone gull / adrift between earth and heaven.” – Tu Fu
“If the water were to drain entirely from a spent fuel pool, it could trigger a catastrophic radioactive fire that would spew toxins and render hundreds of thousands of square miles uninhabitable.  The devastated area would be larger than the wasteland that resulted from the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident.” – Robert Alvarez 

“In the clutter of facts, the destroyers / leave behind them one big story, / of the world and the world’s end, / that they don’t know.” – Wendell Berry (in Leavings)

SUMMARY: 

If the end is indeed near – say, within the next 50 years -- it will quite likely come in the form of extreme drought and/or nuclear contamination. A couple key maps help us flesh out these possibilities. …So is there something we can do about this?
REFERENCES:

Drought:
Nuclear:
DOOMER PORN OR CONSTRUCTIVE WARNING?

I wrote this essay some months ago, but then I put it away. The obvious danger with a topic like this is in fostering the seductive, broad-brush feeling that “we’re done and there’s nothing we can do about it now -- so whatever!” And while there’s a distinctly non-zero chance that this doomerish sentiment is true, there’s also a chance that it’s not true.

So we hang all our efforts and hopes on the chance that, despite our heinous industrial depredations and a likely fierce blowback from the earth systems, we just might have a future here on this planet. And maybe what we do now can make that future a little more livable, more beautiful.

So we work to strengthen human and non-human communities and the links between them. And we work to lessen the depredations and save what we can from the insatiable maw of industrial ‘progress.’ And we steel ourselves and our communities for the spastic convulsions of the industrial machine as it disintegrates. And we try to shelve the hopelessness that lingers around the edges of our thoughts.

But now and then I think we need to take that hopelessness down from the shelf, put it in front of us, and look at it. And we need to say, “Hmmmm…this COULD actually happen.” And then we need to ask if there’s anything, anything at all, we can do to address it more directly.

And maybe we find there is nothing we can do. But maybe we find that there IS something we can do – something we HAVE to do.

And maybe we do it.

OH, THAT SICK, SICK FEELING
Central New Jersey, mid June, 6:30 am, on my farm, out by the pond:
A good rain last night and the seasonally warm temperatures brought an intense green hue to the landscape. Grass, trees, vegetables – they’re all growing like crazy. Tadpoles wriggle thickly at the pond edges. The verdant plants, moist soil, and warm water are sending up a rich bouquet of earthy scents, mixing with the strong fragrance of the chestnut orchard in full bloom. The insects are everywhere. The birds are singing. The warm, wet air envelops my body. There’s so much sensory information all at once, it almost feels obscene.

Deep breath. I feel a deep, primal connection to where I am -- a sort of ancient ecstasy wells up inside me.

And then it hits me. That sick, sick feeling.

Waking nightmare #1: I look down at the cracked gray clay of the pond, shimmering in the intense heat. An unforgiving sun beats down savagely on the dusty yellow pastures and the dying trees; 500+ ppm CO2 enveloping the earth like a blanket. No real rain for going on 30 months. Mid-June temperatures in the 90’s and 100’s daily; upper 80’s at night. The birds gone. And us packing up to leave…for somewhere. Not sure where. Maybe the coast?

…Anywhere but here.

And then waking nightmare #2: Same verdant, aromatic scene as present, but now haunted by what might as well be evil spirits -- unseen, unheard, but methodically hacking away at us. A fallout plume from, well, somewhere, must’ve settled over us two weeks ago – that’s when we first tasted the metal in our mouths. Nobody knows anything about what happened or is happening. We have no idea how bad it was, is, or will get. A lot of us got sick right away; some have died already. And now…well, now we’re just fucking scared. Everything normal and beautiful is now shaded by an ominous pall – the fresh raspberry on the vine, the mockingbird singing in the walnut tree, the bowl of eggs from the henhouse, the baby’s bottle, the dust on the stairs. All of it haunted by an invisible wickedness. …Should we go? Where WOULD we go? …We’ve got to go. …Somewhere.

…Anywhere but here.

EXTIRPATION NATION 

Although I’m not debilitated by it, my waking hours are haunted by the very real possibility that my extended family will not be able to live in this land fifty or so years hence.

Everything I do -- all my work with my farm, my family, and my community -- is done for the purpose of establishing a lasting presence in this place. Right here. It is what I wake up thinking about and what I dream about when I lay down at night. And my heart bleeds with the knowledge that there are gathering storms that may very well rip us from this place, and either crush us or scatter us like dry leaves.

In fact, there is a very real possibility that our culture is on course to make a majority of the nation unfit for human habitation. And I’m not talking about just a future with stressed or difficult lives for the people here (although there are plenty of candidates for that). I’m talking here about literal human extirpation – about NOBODY being able to live here; no humans at least. Extirpation nation.

And while the toxic industrial cupboard is filled with candidates for making large swaths of land inhabitable, the two gathering storms that are perhaps most likely to fill the bill for ‘extirpation nation’ are (1) the mega droughts predicted for a 500+ ppm CO2, climate-destabilized US, and (2) extensive fallout from a cascade of nuclear power plant melt-downs and spent-fuel pool fires.

In the following paragraphs and figures I just want to outline where I think we could be headed here. And again, I write this not to revel perversely in the doomishness of it all, but rather to say that, while this seems to be our course, maybe it doesn’t NEED to come to pass; maybe there is still a way out of this grim (yet increasingly probable) future.

But we’ve got to act. Purposefully and effectively.

And we better start yesterday.

DUST BOWL NATION

What do you do if it doesn’t rain substantially for a whole month at the start of the growing season? And then another month. And then another. And another. And then again for the entire next growing season. And again for the next. And the next. What do you do?

Here’s what you do: you leave. You can’t live in a place like that. And you don’t return until the rains return. And maybe the rains never return. And neither do you.

Welcome to ‘dust bowl nation’.

Is this our future, here in the continental US? The answer, unfortunately, is ‘somewhat likely.’ …And inching more toward ‘probably’ every day.

The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) recently published a report modeling drought severity at the global level over the remainder of this century. The horrifying results are shown below in Figure 1.


Figure 1:  Dust Bowl Nation: 
NCAR modeling of Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) for the 21st century under a scenario where CO2 reaches 520 ppm by 2050 (--a plausible 21st century CO2 level with near-term economic collapse and positive climate feedbacks). A PDSI index exceeding -3 (cherry red) is ‘severe drought,’ while an index exceeding -4 (brick red) is considered ‘extreme drought’. For context on PDSI values: during the Dust Bowl decade, the US Great Plains briefly spiked to a drought severity index of -6 (purple), but rarely exceeded -3 (cherry red). Source: https://www2.ucar.edu/atmosnews/news/2904/climate-change-drought-may-threaten-much-globe-within-decades. (Click on the map within this link to get a close-up on the US)

OK, so how can we interpret this map? Well, the ‘reddening’ of the continental US shows that we’re certainly on tap for some serious drying out over the coming century, but just how bad is it projected to get? Namely, what does a PDSI index of -3 (cherry red) or worse over the majority of the nation by the 2060s signify?

CATASTROPHIC DROUGHTS WE HAVE KNOWN
To gauge the danger illustrated in the NCAR drought map, let’s look at a PDSI reconstruction of the Great Plains over the past century – which includes the Dust Bowl decade of the 1930’s.  See figure below:



Figure 2.  Dust Bowl Drought Index.
Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) graph of Great Plains 1900-2000, including the Dust Bowl decade of the 1930s. Source: http://www.atmos.umd.edu/~alfredo/bguan_final.pdf

Note that, during the 1930’s Dust Bowl in Figure 2, the PDSI briefly spiked to -6, but otherwise rarely dipped below -3. Also note the PDSI moving average (smooth black line) does not exceed -3. Thus, the monumentally destructive Dust Bowl drought represented ‘merely’ a less-than-a-decade stretch of PDSI right around -3. And if you want a feel for what this looks like in real life, see Ken Burns’ Dust Bowl documentary: http://www.pbs.org/kenburns/dustbowl/. Maybe also dig out that old copy of Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath.
The take-home lesson? An decade-long PDSI of -3 will kick your ass. It will kick you off the land.

Now compare the Dust Bowl PDSI levels of around -3 to the NCAR projections for the US in the 2060s. An appropriate response to the juxtaposition of the two graphs is “What the #*&%?!” The continental US becomes agricultural train-wreck, with perhaps over 80% of the country mired in severe drought (exceeding -3) or worse, including the Midwestern agricultural heartland. Fully half of that drought-stricken 80% features unholy drought levels from -4 to -10.

These are unlivable conditions. These are conditions where agriculture just doesn’t work -- conditions where whoever is left of your family packs up whatever they can carry and hits the road…to somewhere….anywhere but here. And the dire projections only worsen into the future.

And while every model prediction should be taken with a grain of salt, this one perhaps should also include a shot of whiskey and a good hard re-assessment of your life. Why? Because with alarming surprise after alarming surprise these last few years, we’ve learned that the climate system is changing either as rapidly or more rapidly than any worst case scenarios presented in the scientific literature. (See http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/11/28/1249391/study-sea-levels-rising-60-faster-than-projected-planet-keeps-warming-as-expected/ and http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/11/29/1246891/scientific-american-ice-melting-permafrost-climate-effects-occurring-alarming-pace/)

So here we are: With every gallon of gasoline, every shovelful of coal, every cubic meter of natural gas we burn, we are literally creating an uninhabitable nation this century. …Is it worth it? Are we really having so much damn fun that we’re willing to sacrifice the future of our species, the future of all species? Good God!

(deep breath)

In any case, if you want to follow all the action, Joe Romm’s posts at ‘Climate Progess’ (http://thinkprogress.org/climate/issue/?mobile=nc) provide excellent weekly reviews of the latest climate science. He does an absolutely fantastic job of keeping up with the scientific literature on drought, feedbacks, and all else climate-change related. And for his commentary on the NCAR study, see his recently published “Dust-bowlification” piece in the esteemed journal Nature: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/05/24/478771/my-nature-piece-dust-bowlification-grave-threat-it-poses-to-food-security/.

…But as bad as the climate situation is shaping up to be, that’s not all we’ve got cookin’ in the wicked industrial oven. Read on.

DIRTY BOMB NATION

What do you do when the very air you breathe, the food you eat, the dust on your furniture, the pollen in your flowers, the kiss of your child – all of it -- is killing you?

What do you do when your children wither and die from a poison that lingers unseen everywhere around you?

Here’s what you do: you leave. You leave the place where the evil lingers, and you go somewhere else. Anywhere else. If you can find somewhere else. And if you can make it in time. And you’re never sure if you did. …And you probably didn’t.

Welcome to ‘dirty bomb nation’.

So could this be our future too? A nuclear exodus rivaling or exceeding the coming dust bowl exodus? Unfortunately the answer to this question is also ‘somewhat likely.’ …And inching more toward ‘probably’ every day.

Listen to this: A 2011 report by Robert Alvarez (former Senior Policy Advisor to Clinton’s Secretary of Energy) of the Institute for Policy Studies, details the amounts of spent nuclear fuel stored at our nations nuclear power plants – as well as the likely triggers and implications for the release of the poisons therein. (http://www.ips-dc.org/reports/spent_nuclear_fuel_pools_in_the_us_reducing_the_deadly_risks_of_storage)

Alvarez’ report will make your skin crawl.

Let me just summarize: (1) Huge quantities if intensely-toxic spent nuclear fuel are being stored on-site at our nation’s 100+ nuclear reactors. (2) Most of the spent fuel is stored in large above-ground ‘swimming pools’, designed to hold about one-fifth of present amounts, packed tightly on submerged racks within buildings “no more secure than a car dealership.” (3) Because the spent-fuel still generates large amounts of heat – enough to ignite itself -- the ‘swimming pools’ require constant active-cooling by water pumps to prevent catastrophic fires that would spew the radioactive toxins over large areas downwind of the plant.

Note that this spent-fuel danger multiplies the already-present danger from melt-down of the reactors themselves – i.e. if one pops-off, the other may very well go as well. In fact, due to decades of stockpiling, the spent fuel pools contain many times the radiation levels present in the reactor cores themselves. And what would be required to initiate a catastrophic fire in either the spent fuel pools or the reactors? Actually not too much. In fact, frighteningly little – especially as we inch (or plummet) towards our grid-challenged, liquid-fuel-scarce, socio-politically-destabilized, climate-chaos future.

Here are some increasingly-likely scenarios that could send reactors and spent-fuel pools popping off like massive dirty bombs all over the country over the next several decades:
  1. Cooling water pumps & intakes:  Cooling-water intakes clogged or pumps break, & can’t fix/replace them in time due to break in parts supply lines or lack of access to damaged plant.
  2. Diesel Fuel:  Electric grid goes down & can’t get diesel re-fills for generators in time due to break in fuel supply lines or lack of access to damaged plant.
  3. Generators:  Grid goes down, generators break, & can’t fix/replace them in time due to break in parts supply lines or lack of access to damaged plant. 
And where are all these 100+ potential dirty bombs in the US?  Well, pretty much wherever there are lots of people living right now.  So there’s a good chance one of them is within 50-miles of you right now.  Figure 3, below, shows a map of US nuclear reactors with 50-mile-radius buffers:



Figure 3: US Nuclear Power Plants. 
Active US nuclear power plants with 50-mile-radius buffers, color coded to indicate population densities within buffer. Source: http://thegazette.com/2012/05/29/nuclear-emergency-planning-overhaul-draws-fire/. See also the interactive map at http://www.psr.org/resources/evacuation-zone-nuclear-reactors.html.

NUCLEAR CATASTROPHES WE HAVE KNOWN

OK, so these dirty-bomb reactors are all over the US -- especially on the highly populated East Coast and Great Lakes region -- but would the increasingly-likely nuclear accidents be enough to render these portions of the nation uninhabitable?

To answer that, let’s look first at what HAS happened already – namely the industrial obscenities of Chernobyl and Fukushima.

And what HAS happened? Well, cutting right to the chase, large swaths of land have simply become uninhabitable – and will likely remain so for centuries. Check out the three figures below: contaminated land around Chernobyl (Fig. 5), contaminated land around Fukushima (Fig. 6), and Fukushima’s largely sea-based radiation plume (Fig. 7).

Note the color-coded keys on each figure for their interpretation – and specifically that radiation levels above 15 Ci/km2 or ~600,000 Bq/m2 make the area essentially uninhabitable.



Figure 5: Chernobyl Radiation Map.

Note that both the ‘Confiscated/Closed Zone’ (cherry red) and ‘Permanent Control Zone’ (red-pink color) represent uninhabitable areas, with radiation levels of >15 Ci/km2 (or >600,000 Bq/m2). Note the irregular weather-driven shape of this uninhabitable zone, extensive within 50 miles from the nuclear plant, and extending >100 miles to the Northeast. Source: http://www.simplyinfo.org/?p=3385 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_Nuclear_Power_Plant_Exclusion_Zone. See also http://www.nirs.org/reactorwatch/accidents/chernob_report2011webippnw.pdf.



Figure 6:  Fukushima Terrestrial Radiation Map: 
Note that the black-shaded regions (radiation levels >600,000 Bq/m2) are uninhabitable, and correspond to radiation levels of uninhabitable zones around Chernobyl in Figure 5. Note also that the irregular, weather-driven shape of this uninhabitable zone extends ~30 miles (50km) from the plant – but also that the majority of the wind patterns were out to sea during the main part of the radiation release. i.e. The REALLY scary part of the Fukushima radiation map is not on this terrestrial map, but rather on the eastern ocean plume (see Figure 7 below). Source: http://www.simplyinfo.org/?p=3385



Figure 7:  Fukushima Radiation Plume:
Most of Fukushima’s radiation was blown out to sea, making the terrestrial contamination much less than it would have been in most other locations. i.e. Japan (and China) got ‘lucky’ -- Fukushima’s terrestrial radiation map in Figure 6 could have been much, much worse. Source: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/radiation-reaches-russia-and-us-west-coast-20110319-1c1ck.html

…OK, so that’s what HAS happened. And should even some small fraction of US reactors blow their top and catch fire, a disturbingly large portion of the US will be rendered uninhabitable. Check out the Alvarez report for detailed accounts of how much poison is stockpiled within these over-loaded spent fuel pools and how much damage could be done by just a single spent-fuel-pool fire. The awesome scale of the danger posed by these spent-fuel pools juxtaposed with the near-complete absence of public discussion about it is simply mind-boggling.

Is anyone in the Halls of Power paying attention to this? Does anyone up there care? …Anyone?

Alvarez warns: “If the water were to drain entirely from a spent fuel pool, it could trigger a catastrophic radioactive fire that would spew toxins and render hundreds of thousands of square miles uninhabitable. The devastated area would be larger than the wasteland that resulted from the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident.” (http://www.ips-dc.org/reports/spent_nuclear_fuel_pools_in_the_us_reducing_the_deadly_risks_of_storage)

Nuclear engineer and whistleblower Arnie Gunderson (from the excellent www.fairewinds.com) warns: “It’s impossible to predict the worst event that Mother Nature or humans, in the form of terrorists, can do to a nuclear power plant. …Nuclear power, when things go wrong…is a technology that can destroy a nation. (“Fukushima Disaster: One Year Later”, Radio Ecoshock podcast)

But wait! -- What about the lofty claims of iron-clad safety from the nuclear industry? Well, unfortunately these claims fail even the most sideways of glances at the actual safety record of these plants. See www.fairewinds.com, www.nirs.org, www.beyondnuclear.org, and www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/ for a disturbingly long and inexcusable list of hair-raising problems accumulating at current US nuclear plants.

And prospects for adequate nuclear plant safety as we move into chaotic industrial endgame are even bleaker, as the US economy founders, material resources become scarce, repair and maintenance schedules are loosened, climate change chaos ramps up, socio-political bonds destabilize, and the aging reactors – still packed to the brim with combustible spent fuel – are operated well past their intended lifetimes.

We are primed for catastrophe across the entire East Coast of the US and either nobody knows or nobody cares. Or both. …Good God!

And perversely, the areas most potentially affected by drought (west of Great Lakes) and nuclear mayhem (east of Great Lakes) complement each other -- turning the entire country into one big dry/toxic ‘exclusion zone’!

So welcome, Americans -- welcome to Extirpation Nation! …We earned it!

SO WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT IT?

…OK, deep breath. …So that’s where we are. That’s the dust-dry, toxic, uninhabitable bed we’re making for ourselves.

And I don’t even apologize for presenting such ‘doomerish’ take on our future, because no matter how well-meaning we are at the community level, the hard truth is that even the most glorious transition town simply will not function so well under a 20-foot high drifting dune or while irradiated at over 600,000 Bq/m2. The best laid plans…

But I realize that honestly facing up to this potentially-grim (and increasingly likely) future can really just suck the air right out of you. It can leave you feeling utterly hopeless.

That’s understandable. …But is it warranted? Isn’t there maybe something – anything – we can do about it? Something that can tip the odds a little bit (or a lot) more in favor of a livable future?

Well…sort of. Maybe. Here’s a few things I can think of:

DEALING WITH DROUGHT

As for climate change and the incipient nation-wide dust-bowl, perhaps we CAN do a couple things:

A.  BRING DOWN THE MACHINE. 
First and foremost, the global industrial economy needs to rapidly and deeply reduce the burning of fossil fuels, starting RIGHT NOW. And not just you or me or our communities or our regions, but the WHOLE DAMN GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL ECONOMY. And the incipient too-little-too-late climate awakening aside, this requires a rapid collapse of said global economy beginning NOW.

See this essay link for what is likely needed in the way of emission reductions to preserve a livable climate: Deus ex Machina: Will economic collapse save us from climate catastrophe?

And so while neither you nor I can initiate such a collapse, as the collapse gets rolling, there may be important emergent roles for some ‘lucky’ individuals in making sure the collapse proceeds rapidly enough. Namely, there may be crucial points in time and crucial human players and crucial bits of infrastructure within the maelstrom of scrambling cities, towns, citizens, politicians, economists, farmers, engineers, manufacturers, military conquistadors, etc. who can keep the collapse collapsing on pace. Maybe you or I will be one of those players.

And yes, I know this is contentious philosophical terrain here. There will be human suffering during rapid collapse – but, I argue, orders of magnitude less suffering than if we don’t collapse rapidly enough. And I do realize this is a controversial topic among even those valuing the future integrity of the ecosphere, so I’ll just direct people to Derrick Jensen’s Endgame for the philosophical underpinnings here. God speed.

B.  WEAN OURSELVES FROM MIDWESTERN AGRICULTURE. 
Secondly, it’s imperative for the parts of the country that remain wet enough for habitation (perhaps the East Coast and Pacific Northwest?) to change the way we do agriculture. Namely, we need to wean ourselves from the agricultural products imported from the soon-to-be uninhabitable areas in the Midwest. No more shall rivers of corn, beans, and wheat floweth from the heartland. Indeed, wind-blown topsoil might be their largest export several decades hence.

And weaning ourselves from Midwestern agricultural products in the midst of a permanent global depression (i.e. collapse) will require the remaining populated regions to be agriculturally self-sufficient. And the likely dearth of fossil fuels in the coming decades necessitates methods of farming that require both a large participation by the population and a massive re-learning of agricultural skills.

This will not be optional. If we can’t do it, then the people who don’t get fed will die. And while we have already started another back-to-the-land movement, it needs to be nurtured and accelerated. Thus, anything we do now to further low-input agricultural participation and education would be crucial. So let’s do it.

C.  ADAPT REMAINING AGRICULTURE TO VICIOUS DROUGHTS. 
And in any regions that remain habitable, we will also need to adapt our farms as cleverly as possible to the nasty droughts that will still undoubtedly haunt us. Adapting our farms to the drought-stricken reality of mid-late 21st century farming will require a significant amount of skill and fore-thought.

As droughts tend to sneak up on you, we can’t be fooled by a few good years, or even a few good decades. We have to plan for the worst we might face. And what does that mean? It means we have to be ridiculously conservative. It means each family, whether on a farm or ¼-acre lot (1) storing several years worth of food and vegetable seeds, (2) planting deep-rooted fruit and nut trees and other perennial food/fiber-producing vegetation, (3) constructing HUGE rainwater collection systems that can provide for EXTENDED multi-year droughts, and (4) learn gardening skills to maximize success in tough times (ex: See The Resilient Gardener and Gardening When it Counts).

Again, not optional. We do it or we die.

Resilience will be paramount for the difficult agricultural landscape ahead of us. I have written several essays on the coming necessity for perennial polyculture and a permaculture approach to farming, so I’ll just link them here: An agriculture that stands a chance: perennial polyculture and the hard limits of post-carbon farming and Resilience or death: Preparing our farms for the end of agriculture (…as we know it)

DEALING WITH THE DIRTY BOMBS

OK, then what can we do about all the dirty bombs primed to go off all over the country?

A.  DRY CASK STORAGE OF SPENT FUEL. 
Of utmost importance is getting all the accumulated and still-combustible spent fuel out of these goddam swimming pools and into dry-cask storage. Basically, this involves semi-stabilizing and entombing the rods in these huge cement composite encasings. The poison is still there, but it’s in a more stable form – requiring no active cooling and much more resistant to release over the next century or so.

Note that the dry cask containers at Fukushima survived relatively unscathed, while the swimming pools were and still are a festering disaster – with the possibility of mushrooming into a global catastrophe should a second earthquake topple the already-compromised structures. See www.fairewinds.com for developments on this.

Alvarez estimates that “over the next 10 years, we could remove all spent fuel older than five years for a cost of $3billion-$7billion.” …So why don’t we do it? Well, let’s ask our local politicians? Let’s ask our state representatives? Let’s ask our president?

…And realize that we won’t just have to ask them; we’ll need to demand that they listen to us. And that means we’ll need help. And so we’ll need to tell other people about it. Lots of people. And we’ll need to be creative. And we better do it soon.

In fact, we better do it DAMN soon: As soon as the economy goes down the rabbit-hole for good, the funds and resources to deal with this shit will be gone – and all the nasties in those spent-fuel pools may be coming to an open window near you.

B.  SHUT THEM DOWN NOW.
And for the love of God, we simply need to stop making the shit.
 Why?
(1) We have nowhere to put it,
(2) it can make our land uninhabitable, and
(3) the spent-fuel needs to “age” 
That's 5 years before it can go in dry cask storage, so we need to shut them down at least 5 years before the resources to do dry cask storage are gone. …

So it’s a no-brainer. Shut them down. Germany’s doing it. Japan’s doing it. So can we. How? Make a stink. Educate. Mobilize. Be creative.

C.  PRAY LIKE HELL. 
The radioactive legacy of the nuclear age will be around for millennia – long after our civilization is gone. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the half-lives of the various radioactive isotopes in the waste by 10 to get their ‘poisonous lifetime’. Radioactive cesium-137 will be deadly for 300 years, plutonium for 250,000 years. …And we have over 30 million spent fuel rods stockpiled in these swimming pools. We can trash the planet many times over. All we need is a streak of bad luck and we’re toast. …So here’s to good luck!

CODA: THE DESTROYERS

“In the clutter of facts, the destroyers / leave behind them one big story, / of the world and the world’s end, / that they don’t know.” – Wendell Berry (in Leavings)

Part I. The Big Story
We once lived the One Big Story of the world.
We were part of the Story.
We helped write It with our bodies,
Just as all creatures – living and non-living – helped write the Story with their bodies.
And the world was whole.

Part II. The Split
And then, with the sowing of seeds,
With the seductive promises of agriculture,
came the split –
Our split from the One Big Story,
-- But not a complete severing,
For we still lived within the Story.
But in our hubris, we began to think we could change It
– to make It about us alone,
or nearly so.
And so we began to tell ourselves a new story –
A story about us – us alone;
And though it sounded so big to us,
This new story was a small story;
In fact, it was a very small story;
That in our intoxication, just seemed so big.
But it was not a big story.
And it was certainly not the One Big Story.
And in the thrall of our new, very-own, very-small story,
We began to forget the One Big Story.
And we began to forget that we still lived within the One Big Story,
And to forget that our bodies still knew the Story;
That our bodies would always know the Story;
And that our bodies would always need the Story to live.
And so the forgetting of the One Big Story continued,
and with it, the forgetting of ourselves.
And thus were the forests flattened and the grasslands overturned,
And thus was the living skin of the land washed to the sea.
And thus were great multitudes of animals slaughtered.
And thus began the destruction of the world.

Part III. The Dismembering
And then, inevitably, in our ceaseless probing and poking,
Did we discover vast treasures of ancient sunlight;
-- Treasures slated in the Big Story to sleep
For hundreds of millions of years longer in the dark.
And we brought them hastily into the light and began to burn them.
And with this burning came another split;
A split that sought not merely to rewrite the Big Story,
But to destroy It absolutely;
Once and for all.
-- And so began the dismembering.
For we carved the One Big Story into pieces,
And we perversely named these pieces “resources.”
And we vowed to use these pieces to build our shiny new story,
-- And not just another new story,
but “the only story that was ever meant to exist”
But to dismember, to dis-re-member, the One Big Story,
Which we still knew, deep in our bodies, to be very wrong,
We had to tell ourselves lies,
-- so many lies!
Over and over again!
-- That there never really was a One Big Story;
That there never was any story but ours;
That there were only ever disembodied pieces, “resources”, for us to assemble;
For us use to build “the only story ever meant to exist.”
And so we worked madly, frantically, desperately
At our dismembering and blasting and burning,
-- Always, always, always burning --
Until what remained of the Big Story lay beneath our feet in tatters.
And upon it,
As our crowning achievement,
Sat a leering,
pathetic
limerick
That we called civilization –
-- Our one very,
very,
very,
very,
very small story;
-- The story of the destroyers.
And “in a clutter of facts,” the destroyers proclaimed it
“The only story that ever could be!”
And the Big Story, though still within our bodies, was thus banished from our hearts,
-- Numbed from us in a haze of equations, words, chemicals and electromagnetic waves.
And thus were the lands and oceans and airs poisoned.
And thus were the great herds and schools and flocks and stands exterminated.
And thus was achieved the destruction of the world.

Part IV. Resurrection
But, of course, the One Big Story was not gone –
Just broken, cracked, burned, and bleeding;
Twisted and tortured into improbable shapes and forms
And this state of affairs was certainly not unfamiliar to the One Big Story.
It had happened before.
Never quite like this, but it had happened before.
And The One Big Story knew what It must do.
It would always know what to do.
And so, as it had so many times before, the One Big Story began to rewrite Itself.
-- Once again, the great re-writing had begun.
…But slowly.
Always very slowly.
For there was, of course, no rush; there were no deadlines; no plan.
It would just unfold as it would,
Like the path of a silver maple leaf drifting, spiraling slowly down, down, down into the swirling river.
Like a…
Hmmm?
 ...what’s that you ask?
No, nobody was really sure if this would include humans.
…Why do you ask?
…In any case,
Thus began the resurrection of the world.

.