Showing posts with label Vote. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vote. Show all posts

Kauai Council is Climate Change

SUBHEAD: The County Council turns down $100,000 in private donations to fund climate action plan.

By Nathan Eagle on 3 august 2017 for Civil Beat -
(http://www.civilbeat.org/2017/08/kauai-council-says-no-thanks-to-100k-to-fight-climate-change/)


Image above: Kauai County Council members 2016-2018 -  Mason Chock, Arthur Brun, Chair Mel Rapozo, JoAnn Yukimura, Ross Kagawa, Derek Kawakami and Arryl Kaneshiro. From original article.

Opponents of taking the money question whether the county needs its own plan. One said the work should be left to the federal government.

Kauai County Council members have rejected $100,000 in private donations to fund a climate action plan for their rural island, which is particularly susceptible to rising sea levels, stronger storms and other effects of climate change.

In a 4-3 vote last week, Council Chair Mel Rapozo and members Arryl Kaneshiro, Ross Kagawa and Arthur Brun opposed a request from Mayor Bernard Carvalho’s administration to accept $50,000 from the Hawaii Community Foundation and a matching $50,000 from the nonprofit Partners for Places.

They expressed skepticism about the need for a county climate plan, saying they didn’t want to duplicate the state’s efforts. They also felt the county economic development director’s explanation of the potential funding was insufficient.

“You don’t need a plan to tell you that you help the environment if you walk more, if you bike more, catch the bus more,” Kagawa said. “If the federal government is working on it, let them do it.”

Councilwoman JoAnn Yukimura, who along with Councilmen Derek Kawakami and Mason Chock supported accepting the money, pointed out at the meeting that the United States is no longer leading on climate change.

“Under President Trump, we’re withdrawing from it and really losing face in the world,” Yukimura said, referring to Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accord.

The Paris agreement, signed by 195 nations in 2015, established a goal of limiting the global temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and laid out plans for countries to work together to adapt to the adverse effects of climate change.

“That’s why the cities now are rising to address it and saying we’re going to do it because it’s affecting the lives of our citizens, it’s affecting the planet and I think this county needs to join in and do that,” Yukimura said.

The council’s Economic Development and Intergovernmental Relations Committee took up the matter again Wednesday, but the deadline had passed Monday to use the foundation’s grant to apply for the matching funds from Partners for Places.

George Costa, director of Kauai’s Office of Economic Development, said Wednesday that he had been reluctant to disclose Monday’s grant deadline at last week’s meeting because of the way council members had reacted the previous time the administration came before them with a last-minute request to apply for a Transportation Alternatives Program grant.

At least one council member said the additional information provided Wednesday by the county’s energy and sustainability manager, Ben Sullivan, who was unable to attend their meeting last week, would have changed their vote.

“Had we had this information last week, this would have passed,” Rapozo said.

Costa said the administration tries to give the council as much notice as possible, but in this case was uncertain whether the private funding would be available until July — although the county started talking to the Hawaii Community Foundation in January.

“A lot of these opportunities do come at the last minute,” Costa said.

Still, Yukimura questioned during Wednesday’s meeting why the county would not want to have the council accept the foundation’s funding, since there was ample time to use it to meet the next deadline in January to apply for a matching grant from Partners for Places.

Sullivan said there’s still a chance the administration will come back to the council to ask for such approval, but he noted that the foundation is now looking for a nonprofit or other third party to receive the funds. He was not sure if new recipients had been determined.

“We’re kind of strategizing and rethinking,” Sullivan said.

‘Defining Issue Of Our Lives’
Kagawa said at last week’s meeting that the idea of a county climate action plan reminded him of Kauai’s efforts to address “all this fear” over genetically modified organisms.

The county passed a bill in 2013 to require GMO companies to disclose more information about the pesticides they use and abide by setbacks for spraying. A federal court later overturned the law.

“I don’t think it necessarily makes sense that the county is getting into the business of telling people on Kauai what to do to help this problem,” he said. “It needs to be done nationwide.”

Kaneshiro had his own fears over what a climate action plan might obligate the county to do.

“Is it going to say airplanes are causing a lot of carbon emissions so we should reduce the amount of airplanes coming to Kauai?” he asked. “Or, you know, vehicles are a main cause of carbon emissions so reduce the amount of miles people can drive on Kauai?”

Yukimura said the plan would not obligate the county to do anything, but instead would provide data and possible strategies.

Sullivan said the county’s climate action plan would add a greater level of detail to the data the state Department of Health is collecting about greenhouse gas emissions, for instance.

Better Communication Needed
The council members, even those supporting accepting the funding, said they did not get the information they needed from Costa last week. Even Yukimura later called his answers “weak.” But those in favor said it still made sense to accept the money and then work out the details for the plan.

Kawakami, who was concerned about the message last week’s vote would send to future potential donors, said he wants a plan that produces results.

“At what point do we get some tangible recommendations on what we need to do with our wastewater facilities, with our county roads and state highways being impacted by sea level rise, and when do we get some sort of tangible to-do list instead of studying this thing?” Kawakami said. “If we study this thing to death then by the time we come out with any real action plan it’s going to be too late.”

Costa said $10,000 of the grant would have gone to a greenhouse gas study that looked at emission levels from various sectors, such as electricity, the landfill and transportation.

He said $40,000 would have gone to community engagement, $10,000 would have been for contingencies and the rest would have been used to contract with the University of Hawaii’s Department of Urban and Regional Planning to drive the plan.

Rapozo said at last week’s meeting that community engagement could be part of a county plan to address climate change, but he questioned spending the money on that, even it wasn’t from Kauai taxpayers.

“I don’t understand how you can get information on a plan with community engagement,” he said. “When you’re doing a plan, I think you’ve got to use scientific data.”

This was the third time the council has rejected funding a climate action plan. Last year, the Hawaii Community Foundation said it would provide $75,000 if the county chipped in $30,000, Costa said.

Kagawa said last week at the meeting that he still did not trust the administration when it comes to addressing climate change.

“I don’t believe they’ll have the plan with the silver bullet to solve the problem,” he said. “That’s just my gut.”

Yukimura, in an email trying to rally her constituents after the vote, called climate change the “defining issue of our lives.” She said Kauai’s fragile and unique environment in particular has a great challenge ahead that demands leadership, community involvement and consensus on a course of action.

In April 2016, Sullivan tried to convey the urgency of coming up with a plan to address climate change while encouraging the council to support the mayor’s $30,000 budget request.

“It’s past time for us to champion this,” he told The Garden Island newspaper at the time.

On Wednesday, Sullivan said in an email that the mayor is committed to developing and implementing a climate action plan and the Hawaii Community Foundation has been “extremely supportive.”

“Despite some communications challenges, today’s meeting seemed to illustrate that our County Council, and quite a few people in our community are also in full support of this effort, so I am confident that we will find a way forward with this work,” he said.

Darcy Yukimura, the foundation’s senior philanthropic officer on Kauai, said the island still has the opportunity to be a leader in the state.

Read more about the administration’s plan below.
(http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3912056-Council-OED-7-31-17-C-2017-168-Development-of-a.html?embed=true&responsive=false&sidebar=false




.

8/13 Primary Elections on Kauai

SUBHEAD: Important primary election dates, information, and lists of candidates.

By Linda Pascatore on 17 July 2016 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2016/07/813-primary-elections-on-kauai.html)


Image above: Hawaiians line up to vote for Bernie Sanders in Democratic Primary. From (http://www.leadertelegram.com/News/Daily-Updates/2016/03/27/Sanders-captures-two-states-Clinton-keeps-big-delegate-lead.html).

Early Walk In Voting for Primary: 1 August to 11 August 2016

Last day to request Mail in Ballot: 6 August 2016

Primary Elections: 13 August 2016 - Polls open 7am to 6pm

To register to vote, update existing voter registration, confirm voter address, and request to vote by mail, find your polling place, or view your ballot, go to: https://olvr.hawaii.gov/Default.aspx



On the front page of the primary ballot, you must first choose one political party or non-partisan, and then vote only for those candidates. Vote for only one candidate for the offices below:

Democratic Party: 
US Senator:

Christensen, Makani
Honeychurch, Tutz
Reeyes, Arturo
Schatz, Brian
Shiratori, Miles

US Representative, Second District
Chan Hodges, Shay
Gabbard, Tulsi

Hawaii State Senator:
Ahuna, Kanoe
Kouchi, Dan

Hawaii State Representative:
District 14:
Nakamura, Nadine
Rosenstiel, Fern Anuenue

District 15:
Oi, Tommy
Tokioka, James Kunane

District 16:
Morikawa, Dee



Republican Party:
US Senator:

Carroll, John
Gottschalk, Karla (Bart)
Pirkowski, Eddie
Roco, John P

US Representative, 2nd District:
Hafner, Eric
Kaaihue, Angela Aulani

State Representative, District 14:
Sandra Combs


State Representative, District 15: 
no candidate

State Representative, District 16:
Franks, Victoria (Vickie)



Libertarian Party:
US Senator:
Kokoski, Michael A



American Shopping Party:
US Senator:

Giuffre, John M (Raghu)



Constitution Party:
US Senator:
Allison, Joy J



Nonpartisan Ballot: 
US Representative, 2nd District:
Turner, Richard



On the back page of your ballot, you will find the non-partisan votes for Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA), Prosecuting Attorney, and County Council:

Kauai County Council:  (vote for not more than 7 candidates)
Apalla, Juno-Ann A
Bernabe, Matt
Brun, Arthur
Chock, Mason
Doctor Sparks, Norma
Fukushima, Richard S
Hooser, Gary L
Kagawa, Ross K
Kaneshiro, Arryl
Kawakami, Derek S K
Kualli, Kipukai
Rapozo, Mel
Yukimura, JoAnn A

Kauai County Prosecuting Attorney (both candidates advance to general election)
Lisa Arin
Justin Kollar

Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA): Hawaii Resident Trustee: (vote for one candidate)
Kahui, Bo V (Craig)
Lindsey, Robert K (Bob)
Trask, Mililani B

Molokai Resident Trustee: (vote for one candidate)
Flowers, Jerry (Manuwa)
Hanapi, Alapai
Machado, Colette (Pipi'i)

At large trustee: (vote for one candidate)
Akina, Keli'i
Anthony, Daniel K
Apoliona, Haunani
Crum, Couglas E
Kalima, Leona Mapuana
Makekau, Keali'i
Mossman, Paul Ledwith

.

Pesticide Vote & Seed Exchange

SUBHEAD: Participate in Garden Island News poll on pesticides and join exchanging GMO free, healthy plants and seeds.

By Jeri DiPietro on 7 March 2016 in Island Breath.org -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2016/03/pesticide-vote-seed-exchange.html)

http://www.islandbreath.org/2016Year/03/160308seedsfull.jpg
Image above: Detail of flyer for Seed Exchange. Click to embiggen. From (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6paDOuNl1yObE9OMXI0ZXFaZnM/view?usp=sharing).

.Aloha all. Here are two timely reminders:

FIRST
Please consider voting in The Garden Island survey asking if you believe pesticides are a matter if concern on Kauai. This poll is only open this week. Do it now!

The link is:
(http://thegardenisland.com/are-you-concerned-about-the-use-of-pesticides-on-kauai/poll_0a3928ea-e1ae-11e5-be7d-8323ce00e866.html)

SECOND
Hope to see you at our the Regenerations International Botanical Gardens Seed Exchange this Sunday 3/13/16 at the Anaina Hou Community Park in Kilauea from 12 to 5pm. This is the event that we all have come to love for the sharing and Aloha of the plants. Come and network, share, and receive! We will have our GMO Free Kauai and Hawaii SEED tent. Come and sign a PASS THE BILL t-shirt to record our historic efforts of "the little island that could".

WHAT:
Seed Exchange

WHEN:
Sunday on the 13th March 2016 from 12pm-5pm

WHERE:
Anaina Hou Community Park in Kilauea

SPONSORS:
GMO Free Kauai, Hawaii SEED and The MOM Hui
PO Box 1177
Koloa, HI 96756
808 651 9603

Hawaii SEED is a 501c3 non profit organization working to educate communities about the health and environmental harms of GMO test fields and chemical cocktails, while working to provide and support safe alternatives for food sovereignty and a strong local farming economy.
Raise Awareness, Inspire Change!

Mahalo and Aloha

Event Flyer- please share

That's all I can stands!

SUBHEAD: In Dixville NH Kasich edged Trump on the Republican side 3 to 2, but Bernie crushed Hillary in a 4 to 0 landslide.

By Nelson LEbo III on 17 Novbember 2016 for the Automatic Earth -
(http://www.theautomaticearth.com/2016/02/thats-all-i-can-stands-i-cant-stands-no-more/)


Image above: Popeye the Sailor's quote(usually said just before he recovers from a beating by eating a can of spinach and beating Bluto was) "That's all I can stands! I can't stands no more!" From (http://www.redbubble.com/people/kashley/works/9077317-thats-all-i-can-stands).

[Note by Automatic Earth publisher Raul Ilargi Meijer: A week after the New Hampshire Presidential Primaries, what lessons, if any, can we take from the dramatic victories of two outsider candidates? Former New Hampshire resident and occasional Automatic Earth contributor Nelson Lebo III weighs in.  Nelson writes below that “Trumpification is a clear and present danger” for writers like me “who rely on the best available data, statistics, facts”. But so far I find Trump mostly amusing, and an excellent indicator of what America has come to. And there’s little he can do to make representation of the facts in the media even worse than it is. Turns out, it didn’t take Trump to Trumpify the media. It might well be the other way around, that the Dumbification of the press paved the way for Da Donald. Here’s Nelson.]


While I’ve lived in New Zealand for eight years, most of my adult life has been spent in New Hampshire, USA – the Granite State – where the official motto is “Live Free or Die.” It’s on the license plate. You don’t get more Libertarian than that.

The state’s unofficial motto is “First in the Nation,” which refers to hosting the first Presidential Primary once every four years (Iowa is not a primary!). First of the first – since 1964 – has been the tiny hamlet of Dixville Notch, whose citizens have embraced the tradition of casting their ballots just after midnight.

Of the nine eligible voters in Dixville Notch this year, five voted in the Republican Primary and four voted in the Democratic Primary. Counting the ballots took 30 seconds. John Kasich edged Donald Trump on the Republican side 3 to 2, but Bernie Sanders crushed Hillary Clinton in a 4 to 0 landslide.

In order to vote in the primary one must be a registered voter: either as a Democrat, Republican or Independent. Registered Democrats and Republicans can only vote in their party’s primary, but Independents may choose either.

I lived in New Hampshire for 16 years, and over that time my primary votes got more and more ‘strategic.’ I have voted in both primaries. When I was young I always cast my ballot for ‘my candidate’ – voting with my heart – but as I got older my votes became increasingly strategic – voting with my head.

Left, right or centre, one thing we the people had in common last Tuesday was the rejection of so-called “establishment candidates.”
Voters are fed up with money in politics.
Voters are fed up with cronyism.
Voters do not want a coronation of another Clinton or Bush.
What shines as a beacon of hope for democracy from what Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. called “the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire” is that no matter how much money and influence the powers-that-be throw behind their candidates, individual voters have the final say. I can’t say that tears came to my eyes when I heard the result, but it did notch up my wavering faith in humanity. Let freedom ring! Let freedom ring!

From this perspective, what happened on the Democratic side is nothing short of a Liberty Bell!

Consider:
  • Every major NH newspaper endorsed Clinton.
  • Every establishment NH Democrat politician endorsed Clinton.
  • Sanders came from a 50-point projected deficit to win by over 20 points: 60% to 38%.
  • Sanders won every demographic – including 70% of women-under-30 – except for over-65s and households making over $200,000.
This result speaks volumes about the current and future generation and wealth gap not only in America, but also in New Zealand and worldwide. In other words, it is a snapshot of what we will see more and more often as Baby Boomers hold on to their wealth and status while Millennials are left holding the bag.
Many of us have seen this form of intergenerational tyranny coming down the tracks for some time. To me it is as simple as this:
In the older demographics, we have a generation or two in America and some other countries who got free university education, bought real estate when it was cheap, and enjoyed decades of cheap energy while destroying the planet’s climate system. Meanwhile in the younger demographics we have a generation or two that did not. Who does not see the imbalance?

Like many culture shifts, this one will move like an earthquake: in creeps and ruptures. The New Hampshire democratic result was a rupture and a week later the aftershocks are still being felt as the political circus moves on to South Carolina.

If anything, the gift of “superdelegates” to Clinton will only increase the tectonic activity between voter demographics, as did the condescending and sexist comments from Madeleine Albright and Gloria Steinem.

The fact that feminist icon Steinem made one of the most sexist comments I have ever heard in an attempt to rationalise why young women support Sanders instead of Clinton shows the desperation of the wealthy, retired left.

It appears that as the older and the wealthier and the whiter see their positions of wealth and privilege threatened, they fight and fight to maintain them. As the late Joe Strummer sang, “Now war is declared and battle come down” (London Calling, 1979).

Consider:
Among democratic voters in NH the #1 issue was income inequality.
Without doubt, Sanders is the income inequality candidate and Clinton is not. I find it troubling that Hillary was paid reported speaking fees of $600,000 (US) by mega investment bank Goldman Sachs, but refuses to release what she spoke about.

Goldman Sachs was at the eye of the financial hurricane that started in 2008 and has only grown richer and more powerful since. I seem to recall Clinton saying during a recent debate something along the lines of, “Of course Goldman doesn’t expect anything in return.” Right…

On the Republican side, NH had its largest turnout ever. Here is my favourite headline: “After running xenophobic & racist campaign, Donald Trump wins easily in New Hampshire.”
I have written about the Trump phenomenon in the past, most recently naming him my Person-of-the-Year for 2015:
Donald Trump is my Person of the Year. Who else has made a bigger splash in 2015?
Pundits say he plays on anxieties that exist among a certain voter demographic. He appears fearless in his attacks on political correctness. Bombastic is a term we hear to describe him.

But I say his most significant accomplishment has been in mastering a communication technique and ideology that has grown to achieve a critical mass of cultural significance: the double down. This is not to be confused with KFC’s Double Down – a beef burger between two pieces of fried chicken breast with cheese and bacon.

Doubling down takes many forms. It can mean making a false statement, and instead of admitting the mistake, vehemently insisting on the ‘truthiness’ of the statement in the first place. Alternatively, it might mean coming up with bad policy and then working tirelessly to try to justify it. It may be throwing good money after bad. In Trump’s case, it also means making outrageous or controversial statements and refusing to backtrack.
Doubling down means never having to say you’re sorry.

Trump is my Person of the Year not because he invented the double down or that he is the only person that does it, but because he has given it a living, breathing form. He is a meme with a comb-over and a personal jet.

Trump’s political success relies on the fact that many people only accept information that fits their existing worldview. Facts don’t matter. Research doesn’t matter. Trained experts don’t matter. As Ray Davies sang in 1981, “Give the people what they want.”
The Trumpification of Western society has reached its watershed moment. It marks the end of apology.
For writers like me and Ilargi and Nicole – who rely on the best available data, statistics, facts and sound research to build a case – Trumpification is a clear and present danger.

Like Sanders, Trump speaks to the economic angst many Americans feel. While both men have a populist message, they appeal to vastly different demographic sub-cultures. The irony of course is that a billionaire businessman has convinced thousands of minimum wage Joe Blogs that he will look after their interests. Right…

When I lived in New Hampshire I remember driving the back roads and seeing run-down, crappy mobile homes in the middle of nowhere with Republican lawn signs out front – Bush, Dole, Romney, McCain – and wondering why these people actively vote against their own economic interests.

Alongside Clinton, the biggest establishment candidate on the ticket was Jeb Bush, whose advertising budget in the state meant that at the end of the day his campaign spent $1,086 (US) per vote. He finished fourth, barely ahead of Marco Rubio.

The takeaway message from New Hampshire is powerful but not new. Voters in Greece have rejected establishment parties – twice. Voters in Portugal recently rejected the establishment. Voters in Iceland did so years ago and their nation is now thriving.

So what’s behind all of this rejection? I reckon it’s because you can only push people so far. As Popeye the Sailor is famous for saying, “That’s all I can stands, I can’t stands no more.”

While Trump is a classic Bluto character – large, loud and aggressive – Sanders retains a classic Popeye attribute that has endeared him to an increasing number of voters: “I yam what I yam and that’s all that I yam.”

Trustworthiness and integrity were the number one characteristic New Hampshire Democratic Primary voters were looking for in a candidate. From this perspective there can be no doubt about last week’s overwhelming result.

.

Residents ban traffic cameras

SUBHEAD: One Missouri county has voted to ban traffic enforcement cameras that hand out tickets.

By Joshua Krause on 29 December 2014 for the Daily Sheeple -
(http://www.thedailysheeple.com/missouri-residents-vote-to-ban-speed-cameras_122014)


Image above: Dayton to stop using traffic enforcement cameras. Speed cameras aimed at U.S. Route 127 in New Miami, Ohio, Feb. 25, 2014. From (http://wdtn.com/2015/01/05/dayton-to-stop-using-traffic-enforcement-cameras/).

It should come as no surprise to most drivers, that speed cameras are not being installed on your roadways to make your life easier (and they are your roadways. Your taxes paid for them). As much as the government would like you to think that they have your best interest at heart, these devices do not make our roads safer.

If anything they may make intersections even more dangerous, and they really don't serve any purpose beyond generating revenue for the city and the police department.

One Missouri county has had enough, and decided to hold a referendum to ban the use of red light cameras. The measure passed with 73 percent of voters in support of the ban. However, some elected officials aren't happy with the new bill, and have decided to bypass the will of their voters.
St. Peters, O’Fallon, Lake St. Louis, and a councilman from O’Fallon are filing a lawsuit in attempt to block a ban on red light cameras in St. Charles County.
Voters approved the ban November 4, with 73 percent of those who went to polls supporting the measure. However, those suing maintain the county has overstepped its legal bounds.

“Seventy-three percent of the voters pass a ban on red light cameras so what these cities are doing are suing 73 percent of the voters in St. Charles County, within their own cities. They’re suing their own residents,” said St. Charles County Councilman Joe Brazil. 
Normally I'm quite wary of Democracy, and its ability to give privileges to the majority at the expense of the minority. But in this case, the voters weren't attempting to stomp on the rights of the minority. They were attempting to protect their money from a thieving political class, and that class is obviously doing their best to stop them.

Fortunately, they probably won't succeed since the councilman who are challenging this ballot probably don't have any legal authority to do so.
“The federal government has jurisdictions over the states, states have jurisdictions over the counties, the counties have jurisdictions over their municipalities, so it’s fairly clear that they have the right to impose laws on those municipalities, especially if those laws are voted into law by the voters,” said Roger Dalsky.
The attorney representing the cities filing the lawsuit said the county’s legal authority is very clear.

“The state can dictate what cities are authorized to do or prohibit the cities from doing things. There’s nothing in the Missouri Constitution that provides the county to do the same thing,” said attorney John Young. 
It just goes to show you how dangerous our elected officials have become at all levels of government.

They try to tell us that we live in a democracy when it benefits them, but when we vote to cut their funding, they act like they have special powers that were never granted to them.

While the state constitution should keep their money grubbing mitts away from Missouri's drivers, there is still a possibility that they could overturn the ban. After all, The United States Constitution has been violated by the political class numerous times without any consequences. Political documents mean nothing to politicians if there aren't enough people willing to protect their rights.

Hopefully the residents and courts of Missouri can stop the overreach of these councilman, because if they can't, it's going to set a very dangerous precedent for elected officials in the future.ey can't, it's going to set a very dangerous precedent for elected officials in the future.

.

KIUC wins SmartMeter referendum

SUBHEAD: KIUC wins battle for no-SmartMeter surcharge and loses the war for hearts and minds.

By Doug Wilmore on 25 January 2014 in Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2014/01/kuic-wins-smartmeter-referendum.html)


Image above: Waking up from the Matrix (the Grid) and detaching. From (http://riverbankoftruth.com/2013/11/29/dont-fake-it-by-greg-calise/).

If you look at the stock market news and results concerning publicly held electrical companies you will see that the smart money is moving away from this sector --- not involving just the coal generating plants but the entire sector.

Solar and other renewables are the competition, and no matter what the PUC does to attempt to prop up the electric companies in Hawaii, people are voting with their feet and moving to solar.

The utilities will counter by changing their rate structure (with the blessing of the PUC) or possibly limiting rooftop solar, but those move will be countered by changes in technology.

At present, used batteries from hybrid cars are being refurbrished to 80% capacity and installed in homes in Japan. Home generating units installed on lease will follow.

New housing developments will likely install their own power units and undercut centrally located older power sources.

The military will come of the grid because of its vulnerability to hackers and shut down, a national security problem.

While the PUC in Hawaii will continue to support the utilities over the people the evolution of electric power generation will do much more than passive government regulation to change the land scape.

Smart CEOs on the mainland are embracing these changes and altering their business model. To plan for the future the PUC needs to support smart and creative business managers, not smart meters. The change it is a coming.



KIUC board decision stands
SUBHEAD: Members of Kauai Island Utility Cooperative voted to keep a fee structure in place that charges only members who opt out of using a smart meter.

By Tom Hasslinger on 26 January 2014 for the Garden Island -
(http://thegardenisland.com/news/local/smart-meter-fees-stand/article_e97db2d0-8654-11e3-9b2b-0019bb2963f4.html)

Of the 10,901 ballots received, 8,010 voted in favor of the fees while 2,797 opposed.

The nearly 11,000 ballots amounted to a record turnout for a co-op election, with 43 percent of the 25,205 members casting a vote, according to a KIUC press release Saturday.

“The record voter turnout along with the big margin for ‘yes’ votes suggests that the vast majority of members were engaged, understood what was at stake and wanted to send a clear message that they supported the board’s decision to charge the fees,” said Allan Smith, chairman of the KIUC board of directors, in a press release. “We’re grateful for that support and we thank the members on both sides of the issue who took the time to vote.”

Since November 2013, KIUC has charged $10.27 a month to customers who choose not to use a wireless smart meter.

The charge, which was approved by the Public Utilities Commission, covers the cost of manually reading the meters. KIUC also charges one-time fees to customers who ask to have their meter switched to anything other than a smart meter.

The deadline to vote was noon Saturday. The election began earlier this month after concerned members petitioned to have the issue put to a vote.

The results broke down to 74 percent in favor of the fees, while 26 percent were opposed.

The nearly 3,000 votes against the fees mirrors the number of people who have opted out of using a smart meter since the co-op began installing them.

Had the board’s decision been overturned, fees for servicing non smart meter users — roughly $340,000 a year — would have been spread across all members.

Those against smart meters have cited health and privacy concerns with the devices.

Jonathan Jay, one of three drafters of a petition which ultimately sent the issue to a vote, said he was more excited about the high voter turnout than disappointed about the result.

He called the mass participation a positive sign and a step in the right direction.

“It’s awesome that so many people took part in the election,” said Jay, who is running for a board seat, after learning the outcome. “I think that’s good for the co-op and good for democracy and I think that’s the most important thing for a co-op. And I’m glad we’ve had that conversation.”

Members voted by mail, by phone and online between Jan. 4 and Saturday. The election was conducted by Merriman River Group, a Connecticut-based election management firm.

Counting was observed by a representative of the Oahu branch of the League of Women Voters, KIUC said in the press release.

The cost of the current election has been pegged at $63,000.

The campaign season saw advertising by both sides, as well as a injunction request by member Adam Asquith that aimed to block the co-op from collecting non-smart meter fees, but it was denied in 5th Circuit Court last week.

The previous record voter turnout was 34 percent in the 2003 directors’ election, when 7,595 members voted, KIUC said.

Thirty-two ballots were marked over or under, which means they either voted for neither or both decision-points.

Sixty-two ballots were voided, which could be for a marked out bar-code so it couldn’t be read or the ballot wasn’t returned in the special envelope or the member voted online and then sent in a mail ballot.

See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: Kauai's foolish electric company 1/19/14
.

Bill 2491 into the home stretch

SUBHEAD: With 2 YES votes, 2 NO votes and 3 "How to get through this without killing my political career?"

By Andy Parx on 1 September 2013 for Parx News Daily -
(http://parxnewsdaily.blogspot.com/2013/09/around-turn-and-down-stretchthey-come.html)


Image above: Ad slogan from chemical company; "DDT - It's good for Me-e-e!" Truck sprays children with DDT in Waco, Texas, in 1950's. From (http://kootation.com/malick-s-the-tree-of-life-life56-film-stage/thefilmstage.com*wp-content*uploads*2010*12*Tree-of-Life56.png/). See also (http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/06/27/ddt-is-good-for-me-e-e/).

It's crunch time for Bill 2491 as a series of events this week lead up to the big Kaua`i County Council committee meeting on Monday September 9, including the Mana March and Rally on Sunday September 8th when thousands are expected to gather at Vidhina Stadium in Lihue at 11:30 a.m. and and at noon march up Rice Street to the County Building where music and fun are promised.

But before that on Thursday September 5th the Council will be holding a executive session meeting on the bill that would require disclosure of restricted pesticide use, buffer zones around schools and homes and a moratorium on new experimental Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) tests pending an environmental assessment.

Closed door meeting or not, organizers are urging people to make a showing in their red shirts to show support for the bill. Even though public testimony will be taken (by law), since most everything that can be said to the council has been said, it would seem counterproductive to make it into a repetitive public yak-fest.

So what is The State of The Bill this week? And what are both the white hats (Gary Hooser and Tim Bynum) and the black hats (Mel Rapozo and Ross Kagawa) planning?

Near as we can tell despite the fact that the 'chemical-biotech/just-plain-simple-farmers' massive million dollar PR campaign has put bullet after bullet into their own feet with counter-intuitive shmaltz and "did he really say that" common-sense-defying, expert blathering, there are still at least 17 people left on the island, with the exception of employees and vendors, who actually oppose the intent of the bill.

But for the other 60,742 of us the important numbers are 2-2-3: two yes votes, two no votes and three "how am I going to get through this without killing my political career and/or legacy" votes.

On the September 9th it's expected that the NOs, Mel and Ross, will put up a fight on a few fronts to give cover to councilmembers Nadine Nakamura and Jay Furfaro to vote to kill the bill entirely and JoAnn Yukimura to water it down with amendments that could allow it to pass but make it all but totally ineffective.

On the legal front all indications are that neither the County Attorney nor Attorney General is going to say there is any type of state law "preempting" the county's constitutional right to regulate the health and environmental safety of it's citizens. There is no question of preemption at the federal level as even the chemical companies' lawyers have agreed, there being strong US Supreme Court rulings saying that the county has those rights.

It is expected that some other big gun attorneys will show up to support the legality of the bill and it's looking like there's not much the "other five" will have on this front.

Then there are the "medical" issues... for lack of a better term.

JoAnn Yukimura has been making a lot of noise at a pitch only a lawyer can hear, trying to look for the definitive link to an actual proven medical epidemic of pesticide-related disease. This of course is NOT what is required as medical review, unlike law, is a very long meticulous process where "proof" of harm is concerned. But all that is needed legally here is the strong POTENTIAL for harm.

And there's no one but those Roundup-guzzling salesmen denying a pervasive potential for harm.

First there is the American Council on Pediatrics strong disdain of child exposure to any pesticides and the growing undeniable exposure of Waimea children at their schools and residences and other areas exposed to the wind drift. There's the sheer number of days and types of restricted use pesticides (RUPs), which are used in open air experiments 240 days a year, with each day having the potential for use of multiple RUPs. And there's the testimony of apparently all the pediatricians and almost every doctor and other health care provider on the island, all warning of the harm they are actually seeing.

To pooh-pooh this as being "only anecdotal" and not real potential harm is to misunderstand the nature of medical inquiry. It's painfully obvious why there are no "25-year studies" and as a matter of fact a law that requires disclosure is the first step in setting up these studies.

That kind of study is something that our state Department of Agriculture (DOA) seems to be working as hard as they can to prevent, ignoring and even misrepresenting the incidents of poisonings and looking more and more like shills for "Big Chemical" than the state level protector of the health of the people.

Wanna see something really scarey? One of our researches who has seen the DOA's inspection logs says that they made only 175 total inspections of all pesticide users in Kauai county over the past two year period. Of these inspections they have redacted 45% as "ongoing investigations" of "open cases" where violations could supposedly lead to enforcement actions, although enforcement of regulations in government circles is usually more a case of "seeking compliance" instead... sometimes years after the violation.

In these ongoing cases all the information is blank so no one in the public has any idea what the violation even is (or was). Of the unredacted inspections there were only 29 during a two year period that were done on the operations of the four agrochemical companies or 3.625 inspections per company per year... about one every hundred days. And they tell them when they are coming.

Don't forget about those 240 spraying days a year, according to information revealed though the current federal court lawsuit against Pioneer filed by 100 west-side people who say they've been harmed by the chemical companies pesticide practices.

Additionally, the Kauai DOA representative said in an open council session that it takes up to 3 years to resolve and close a case. They also said they don't even publicly notify the community when violations occur but only when they are resolved and then only if a member of the public requests the information.

And just ask anyone who has ever requested information from a state agency how easy that is. And that's for agencies that don't have anything they want to hide.

Which brings us to what will probably prove to be bill supporters' biggest challenge next week- one that people need to be fully aware of and fight like hell to stop it from happening.

Ross and Mel are determined to find a way to stop this bill - all of it. Killing it entirely most likely won't happen although remember what we said about JoAnn (Nadine too in past posts) and amendments. The disclosure and buffer zones look strong unless someone wants to throw away their political career or, in Jay's case, legacy.

The only way to stop it is to kick it upstairs.

We were discussing this with a long time observer and political operative on Kauai and, not surprisingly, we saw our own thoughts reflected in the email: It read:
What needs debunking is the laughable notion that "the state or federal government will take care of this for us if only we put pressure on them." It's the old "I'm going to write a letter and we can all sign it" strategy...just plain stupid.


"This is not our job and we will demand that the governor, the state legislature and the EPA and congress (in between voting to go to war)... make them do their jobs."


I can see it now. Kouchi and Tokioka will agree to "draft a Bill". The DOH and the DOA will agree to "look into updating the rules" and maybe the governor will even "establish a task force"...and see, there...it is all handled and several council members will say "whew...it is all handled...look what we did mom...plus we will write that letter... and we will all sign it...demanding that they do something...and then we'll get really tough... we will schedule a follow up meeting to make sure it happens."


As you and I know...nothing will happen except the process will drag for another 2 or 3 years...the industry hacks and attorneys will do their thing at the legislature during the long drawn out rule making process...and at the end of the day there will be bupkis, nada, nothing.


Plus...a quick scan of the campaign spending reports shows several of our legislative people are clearly taking piles of money from the biotech and GMO industries. And...the Chair of the Senate Ag committee (where any legislation will have to pass through) has also taken plenty...including donations from pharmaceutical companies (now why would a pharm company give to an Ag Chair?). I only skimmed very quickly the reports and found the obvious direct contributions and have not yet googled individuals or looked at the lobbyists numbers to see who the lobbyist who was giving money had as clients. I can't imagine what that will show...
All snark aside you get the picture. This little dance is a tried and true way for these snakes to slither out of dealing with political grenades once they've failed to table them with 14 "Star Chamber" executive sessions where they come out and say "We can't tell you what it is but there's a very good reason we're killing this."

To put a fresh spin on an old canard:
"We could tell you why but then we wouldn't be able to kill you"
This is really what we have to prevent. Mel is a master of this kind of "it's someone else's fault/responsibility" fake outrage. When you're watching him do it remember what you're watching. This is going to be a week when everyone needs to play the part they've taken and play it like their life depends on it. It just might.

Other events this week include:

Tuesday September 3rd from 5-8pm. An informational meeting "fun event" for south-side people in large pavilion at Poipu Beach Park. Nurses and friends of Kauai will answer questions based on new information from the American Pediatric Association about pesticides.

Wednesday September 4th at 5th pm. Sign making and planning for Sunday's March and Rally- pot luck; dance with DJ at Lydgate State Park big pavilion.

.

What is in the Greeks best interest?

SUBHEAD: Greece has one thing going for it - people largely still know how to take care of themselves.  

By Raul Ilargi Meijer on 17 June 2012 for the Automatic Earth -  
(http://theautomaticearth.com/Finance/what-choice-is-in-greeces-best-interest.html)

 
Image above: Greek tragic figure of Orestes being hounded by the Furies. Painting by William-Adolphe Bouguereau, in 1862. From (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:William-Adolphe_Bouguereau_%281825-1905%29_-_The_Remorse_of_Orestes_%281862%29.jpg).
 
I

n all of the things written about Greece and the rest of southern Europe these days, and there's an avalanche of articles, there is very little mention of the fact that Greece, Spain and Portugal were - brutal and bloody - dictatorships until less than 40 years ago. After WWII, their populations were largely left to fend for themselves for decades by the richer countries of Europe - and by the US -, until they toppled their military regimes in the mid-1970s.

While the rest of Europe, as well as the US, enjoyed their probably richest time in history, Greek, Spanish and Portuguese citizens lived mostly in wretched poverty and deadly fear. Italy might as well have been a dictatorship too, it was a democracy only in name, with the iron grip on power of the mafia, the Vatican and a slew of secret societies. Ireland was pretty much a desolate backwater.

When Greece finally dumped its military regime in 1974, moreover, it went straight to the Papandreou and Karamanlis families and their PASOK and New Democracy parties, and corruption and feudalism simply continued underneath a thin veneer of ”voting rights".

When the country entered the EU in 1981, that's where it was: a more or less feudal society. But one that Germany, France and Holland figured they could sell their increasing industrial output to. That output had outgrown its established markets, and new ones were created in the former destitute dictatorships in the south. It didn't matter much, other than in name, what the domestic political situation was in these new markets. What mattered was how much production could be sold. If rich Europe felt parties like PASOK would produce better economic results, they would support them.

And after all, there were clear and present dangers in the PIIGS countries. Not only were there the IRA in Ireland, ETA in Spain and the Red Brigades in Italy, they all had, to varying degrees, strong communist movements. Which had typically formed not so much as ideological movements, but as the only force against brutal regimes from which rich Europe - and, again, the US - historically had done precious little to protect the people they now sought as the new customers for their industries.

Communists were considered evil. They are a detriment to establishing new export markets. They had ties to Russia, maybe even China.

It's sort of funny to realize that if the Greeks today elect SYRIZA, it’ll be the first time in a long, long history that they vote to move away from feudalism and dictatorships. And that move is presented to them, and to us, as the worst one possible. It's an old song: history gets turned on its head for the sake of money and profits. That's undoubtedly also why western media label the party "extreme left".

I could write a lot more on the historical issues that play into today's Greek vote, on Greece's role in WWII, which lasted way beyond 1945, with a bitter civil war and a 1967 US-supported coup, about its part in the entire deadly Balkan conundrum, the neverending fights over territory, which saw their most recent episodes in mass killings in Bosnia and Serbia, about the Ottoman and Habsburg empires, on why the countries resurrected by the Marshall plan left southern Europe to its own suffering, but for now let's focus on the present.

The EU core countries plan a huge firewall to protect Spain and Italy from losing access to bond markets in case Greece leaves the eurozone. But surely they must understand that trying to dump Greece would require that firewall to be much larger?! They might be much better off negotiating a new deal with Greece. From a strictly financial point of view, that is.

And a new deal is necessary anyway, because the Greek economy is fast deteriorating, and the country can't possibly fulfill all conditions the "old” deal demands, no matter how austere it gets. Moreover, banks deposits have plummeted through capital flight and domestic withdrawals, so all banks are -again - teetering. Spain's banks are little different.

If the ECB, the EU, and the Bundesbank would accept similar haircuts to those they themselves have forced upon private lenders, Greece would be much better off. But then, such haircuts would be demanded for Ireland, Portugal, Spain and Italy too, and that would empty ECB reserves, and then some. Hence, Greece is forced to pay back loans for which it was clear when they were given that they could never be repaid.

In the end it's really simple: the eurozone is doomed to failure, simply because the debt levels are too high. All over the place; not just in Greece, which is no more than a sideshow.

When, in the first large European recent crisis event, Ireland's banks failed 3 years and change ago, its government could - make that should - have allowed loans to its banks to default. Many of these loans were from German - and French, Dutch - banks. Instead, they were made whole, and Germany didn't have to bail its banks out. Ever since, this has been the one and only policy, with the possible exception of the Greek haircut. But it doesn't solve anything at all: debts are still way too high. They're just transferred, every step of the way, from the banks' bond- and shareholders to the public in all of Europe's streets.

If a bank has excessive debt levels, it needs to be restructured and allowed or made to default, and its creditors should incur haircuts in order of superiority. The big problems today, in Europe and globally, are that just about every bank has hugely excessive debt levels - and exposure -. This means that in case of restructuring an enormous amount of - virtual - wealth would vanish overnight. Wealth that is in the hands of those who dictate policy, and have the political power to shift their debt to state coffers.

It is a dead end policy, but that doesn't matter much to them: they just need a bit more time, so they can get as close as possible to the completion of the transfer. Then, everything can and will be allowed to fail.

In that light, perhaps a SYRIZA victory today would be the best thing that can happen, for the Greeks, but also for all other Europeans. In spite of the plans to build a €1 trillion or bigger firewall around the rest of the PIIGS, it might just force the hand of the bankers/politicians, if only because €1 trillion won't be enough to appease the markets for long, and neither would €2 trillion. €100 billion for Spain was effective for no more than a few hours.

If you just keep on throwing money at the banks, without restructuring their debt, everybody knows that they're still weak and vulnerable, and that means betting against them is potentially profitable. As I wrote earlier this week, what you get is a situation where banks which are walking dead, take the money from the bailout facilities established by national central banks as well as ECB and EU, and use that money to bet against the whole set-up, and against their peers. It's simply the potentially most profitable game in town. They know how vulnerable other banks must be because they know their own situation.

Maybe Alexis Tsipras, if he wins, can simply threaten to print euros if the ECB closes the spigot, or even to print them with an X, the symbol for German euros. Sure, perhaps that's illegal, but then, tons of legal issues are either not at all, or poorly defined, so who knows, or cares, really? One thing Tsipras will certainly do is to say (he already has) that Greece doesn't want to leave the euro, and since there is no mechanism for a country to leave, the rest will need to invent a mechanism, and it will in all likelihood need to be accepted unanimously, so bring it on!

Look, Tsipras knows the history I talked about; he knows his potential place in history, and he knows where Germany et al are vulnerable. Most of all, he knows he can't lose: if someone else wins this round, and the austerity plans are Greece's immediate future, he’ll have another shot at gold a few months from now, because there is no way it's going to work.

Because Greece is too far gone, and so are Spain and Italy, and increasingly, France is mentioned as an at-risk economy, and and and. One more time: there's too much debt, and unless it is restructured, and the banks take losses, not the public, nothing truly changes.

Greece has one thing going for it: because dictatorialism, and the abject poverty it brought along, ended so recently, people largely still know how to take care of themselves. The same goes for Spain, Italy and Portugal. Not in Milan or Barcelona, but certainly in the countryside. You won't find that in Britain or Holland or most of Germany and France. It may be the biggest blessing they could hope for. And they might be much better off entering the inevitable next phase with Tsipras than with another Papandreou or Karamanlis, or heaven forbid another military regime. They haven't exactly had a fair and square deal for the past hundred years or so.

.

Papandreou Referendum Bombshell

SUBHEAD: Greece risks tripping worldwide economic meltdown if they hold Euro bailout referendum. By Dina Kyriakidou & Lefteris Papadimas on 1 November 2011 for HuffPo - (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/01/greece-referendum-bombshell-george-papandreou_n_1069634.html) Image above: Greek demonstrators in athens face riot police in May 2010. From (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1270248/Teargas-petrol-bombs-thrown-Greek-police-protesters-clash.html). The Greek government faced possible collapse on Tuesday as ruling party lawmakers demanded Prime Minister George Papandreou resign for throwing the nation's euro membership into jeopardy with a shock call for a referendum.

Caught unawares by his high-risk gamble, the leaders of France and Germany summoned Papandreou to crisis talks in Cannes on Wednesday to push for a quick implementation of Greece's new bailout deal ahead of a summit of the G20 major world economies.

The euro and global stocks were pummeled on financial markets after the Greek move threw into question the survival of crucial efforts to contain the euro zone's sovereign debt crisis.

Six senior members of Greece's ruling PASOK socialists, angered by his decision to call a plebiscite on the 130 billion euro rescue package agreed only last week, said Papandreou should make way for "a politically legitimate" administration.

A leading PASOK lawmaker quit the party, narrowing Papandreou's already slim parliamentary majority, and two others said Greece needed a government of national unity followed by snap elections, which the opposition also demanded.

Euro zone leaders thrashed out Greece's second financial rescue since last year, in return for yet more austerity, in the hope that it would ease uncertainty surrounding the future of the 17-nation single currency.

Instead, financial markets suffered another bout of turmoil on Tuesday due to the new political uncertainty and the risk that austerity-weary Greeks could reject the bailout. Opinion polls show most voters think it is a bad deal.

The euro fell nearly three cents against the dollar and the risk premium on Italian bonds over safe-haven German Bunds hit a euro lifetime high, raising Rome's borrowing costs to levels that proved unsustainable for Ireland and Portugal.

"The referendum is a bad idea with a bad timing. The post-summit rally is over," said Lionel Jardin, head of institutional sales at Assya Capital, in Paris.

European bank shares dived on fears of a disorderly Greek default and the Athens Stock Exchange suffered its biggest daily drop since October 2008, with the general index shedding 7.7 percent.

"GRENADE"

European politicians expressed incredulity and dismay at Papandreou's announcement on Monday evening that took everyone by surprise, including his own finance minister.

"Announcing something like this only days after the summit without consulting other euro zone members is irresponsible," Slovak Finance Minister Ivan Miklos told Reuters.

Ireland's European affairs minister, Lucinda Creighton, whose own country is struggling through an EU/IMF bailout program, said last week's European summit was meant to have dealt with the uncertainty in the euro zone.

"And this grenade is thrown in just a few short days later," Creighton said. "Legitimately there is going to be a lot of annoyance about it."

In a statement after French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel conferred by telephone, Sarkozy's office said: "France and Germany are determined to ensure, with their European partners, the full implementation in the quickest time frame, the decisions adopted at the summit, which are today more important than ever."

The renewed uncertainty is bound to embarrass G20 host Sarkozy as he tries to coax China into throwing the euro zone a financial lifeline.

It could also further undermine dwindling political support in northern Europe for aiding Greece. Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte told parliament in a letter his cabinet was concerned about the risk of delay and uncertainty.

Business executives in Greece expressed despair at how the country was being run and markets speculated on whether Italy will be the next euro zone country to slide into a debt crisis.

"I think by late evening this saga will have come to an end because he (Papandreou) will have lost the slim majority that he has in parliament," Athens Chamber of Commerce head Konstantinos Michalos told Reuters Insider television.

"This referendum will not happen. I'm hoping and praying for a government that will join other political forces."

The chairman of euro zone finance ministers, Jean-Claude Juncker, said Greece could face bankruptcy if voters rejected the bailout package.

DEFECTIONS

Papandreou, whose party has suffered several defections as it pushes waves of austerity through parliament despite mass protests, said he needed wider political backing for the budget cuts and structural reforms demanded by international lenders.

But the conservative opposition called for snap elections. "Elections are a national necessity," opposition New Democracy party leader Antonis Samaras told reporters.

PASOK lawmaker Milena Apostolaki quit the parliamentary group, reducing Papandreou's strength to just 152 seats out of 300 deputies before a vote of confidence later this week.

Fellow PASOK lawmaker Vasso Papandreou, who is not related to the prime minister, asked the Greek president to work for a national unity government to ensure Athens receives the rescue funds, followed by early elections.

Papandreou did not even inform Finance Minister Evangelos Venizelos he was going to announce the referendum on the latest EU aid deal, a government official told Reuters.

"They must be crazy... this is no way to run a country," said a senior executive of one of Greece's biggest firms, speaking on condition of anonymity.

CAST ADRIFT?

One senior German parliamentarian suggested the euro zone might cast Athens adrift, cutting off its aid lifeline and allowing the nation to default on its huge debts.

"One can only do one thing: make the preparations for the eventuality that there is a state insolvency in Greece and if it doesn't fulfill the agreements, then the point will have been reached where the money is turned off," Rainer Bruederle, floor leader for the Free Democrats, junior partners in Merkel's center-right coalition, told Deutschlandfunk radio.

On the markets, players scurried for safer investments, hammering stocks and punishing the euro.

The FTSEurofirst 300 index of top European shares was down almost four percent, due not only to the possibility of a hard Greek default but also to Europe's inability to stop the debt crisis spreading to bigger economies such as Italy.

Banks exposed to Greece and Europe's bigger, troubled economies, suffered most. Shares in France's Societe Generale tumbled 17 percent and Credit Agricole was down almost 12.5 percent.

Greece is due to receive an 8 billion-euro tranche in mid-November, but that is likely to run out during January, around the time of the referendum, leaving the government with no funds if there is a "no" vote.

.