Showing posts with label Landfill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Landfill. Show all posts

Tourist Island of Trash

SOURCE: Katherine Muzik PHD (kmuzik@gmail.com)
SUBHEAD: France's Corsica has gone from being the 'isle of beauty' to being the 'isle of trash'

By Pierre Lafranchi on 11 October 2105 for Terra Daily -
(http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Frances_Corsica_from_isle_of_beauty_to_isle_of_trash_999.html)


Image above: The landfill of Vico, on the French Mediterranean island of Corsica, France's lush and feisty Mediterranean "isle of beauty", has another nickname, the "scented isle". From (http://www.deccanchronicle.com/151011/world-europe/article/frances-corsica-isle-beauty-isle-trash).

Corsica, France's lush and feisty Mediterranean "isle of beauty", as it's known, has another nickname, the "scented isle" for its dense fragrant shrubs.

Of late the moniker has taken on a tongue-in-cheek twist as the island faced a massive garbage problem.

The crisis jettisoned Corsica back into French news headlines thanks to overflowing landfills and malodorous garbage left by the hordes of tourists who flock to the Mediterranean jewel known for its vast sandy beaches, mountain vistas and rare animal and plant life.

Residents and tourists produce more than 300,000 tonnes of trash annually on Corsica, or the equivalent of more than 100,000 cars, and landfills are reaching full capacity.

Rampant construction on the island also contributes vast amounts of waste.

The rubbish problem got so bad that a union shut the landfills and halted rubbish collections before finally agreeing to return to work late last month -- for the time being.

A burgeoning population contributes to the growing garbage piles, with around 4,000 new residents arriving each year -- adding to the 310,000 inhabitants already on the island.

It is not uncommon to see garbage bags in coastal nature reserves, and piled up after mobile homes come through.

The crisis of overflowing bins is largely blamed on foreign holidaymakers.

During peak tourist season, the population increases by tenfold, and around 20 percent of those tourists are foreigners.

Several hikers have been fined for leaving trash on trails, particularly on the popular GR20 -- which crosses Corsica diagonally north to south and is considered one of Europe's most beautiful mountain trails -- frequented by thousands of tourists every year, according to Michel Acquaviva, head of parks on the island.

Acquaviva said that some of the foreign tourists may feel "intoxicated by a smell of freedom" on the island and dispose of their waste without thinking of the consequences.

But that "smell of freedom" is quickly going off.

Some landfills, already saturated with rubbish from surrounding neighbourhoods, are refusing to take waste from other regions. France's Environment Minister Segolene Royal has called for action and urged for more regulation, calling the waste problem "particularly critical on Corsica".

- Fed up with the waste -

Only around 20 percent of Corsica's waste is recycled, which is close to the national average but well below countries like Germany (47 percent) and Slovenia (55 percent), according to EU's statistics agency Eurostat.

This is primarily because waste is not sorted -- so people end up tossing everything into the same bin, and it ends up in the same place.

Some towns are taking the issue into their own hands.

The small village of Girolata, on the western coast of Corsica, recycles around 80 percent of its rubbish, thanks to an efficient sorting system.

The town's programme works so well that it attracts official delegations, inspired by its waste management model.

According to Mayor Francois Alfonsi, Girolata has invested 350,000 euros (HK397,000) in waste sorting and treatment.

Royal said Corsica could dramatically reduce its waste by sorting at the source. That means sorting out plastics, glass and paper before waste goes to the landfill.

Royal also supported a waste treatment facility for Corsica, a move that some environmentalists have criticised.

"How can Ms. Royal denounce mechanical biological treatment in Paris and defend it here?" said the spokeswoman of the collective against incineration in Corsica, Marie-Dominique Loye.

.

Hanamaulu Landfill Siting

SUBHEAD: Meeting on on Maalo Road landfill siting this Tuesday 6:00pm at King K Elementary.

By Nina Monasevitch on 4 February 2013 in Island Breath.
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2013/02/hanamaulu-landfill-siting.html)


Image above: Aerial view of Wailua Falls at the end of Maalo Road. From (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ironrodart/3617887042/).

WHAT:
 Public county meeting on Hanamaulu landfill siting on Maalo Road in Hanamaulu

WHEN:
 Tuesday, February 5th at 6:00pm

WHERE:
King Kaumuali'i Elementary School
Hanamaulu, Kauai (off Kuhio Highway)

The county has chosen Ma'alo for the new landfill and Resource Recovery Park (RRP) http://www.kauai.gov/newlandfillsite/

We all need to show up at meeting this Tuesday, February 5th, 6:00pm at King Kaumuali'i Elementary School and say NO to this site!

Is the Ma’alo site for the next landfill a bad choice?

The Hawaiian word for water is wai. The Hawaiian word for wealth is waiwai. Unless we are mistaken, this roughly translates to mean that fresh water is the most precious resource. It is written that the people of old had Kapu, sacred with the implication of forbidden, on certain activities upstream. In this way, clean wai was available for farming, making medicines and drinking.

How could a rational person, with a Hawaiian heart and a scientific mind think of locating a landfill upstream in the vicinity of surface drinking water? Where is the wisdom in that?

What are the implications that the state is holding the land that was ceded by Queen Kamalu?

What will be the cost to future county engineers to bring fresh water to the people of Hanama’ulu, Kapaia, Lihu’e and lower Wailua?

How many years and how many big rains until the surface water is polluted? How many generations until the ground water is poisoned?

What will be the agricultural costs? It is said that the area proposed is arguably the best farmland in the ahupua’a, land division. How much food, for how many generations could be grown on that 160 acres? How many jobs and for how many generations could work that land? If there is a landfill, how soon will the land and the water be poisoned?

Strangely, in studying the location site map that the county prepared in the power point presentation, available online, the reservoirs are not shown.

Does this implicate the county engineers in condoning a site they know will pollute the surface water supply in the short term, and the ground water in the long term?

Does this put the county and the future taxpayer at risk of a major class action lawsuit for polluting the fresh water of future generations? Will the environmental assessment (EA) answer any of these questions? Will any journalists?

Primary concerns:
  • Contamination of fresh water supply.
  • Streamflow needs to be increased already for watershed restoration.
  • Ruin of the Hanamaulu Watershed. Total watershed Rating was 4 in 2008 Not good but potentially salvageable.
  • What will it be with land fill and horizontal well?
  • Loss of viable, rich agricultural land.
Secondary Concerns:
  • Traffic flow, sole artery Maalo Road.
  • Environmental Justice issue, mitigation due to minority and income make up of Hanamaulu area.
  • Kapaia Valley residents are not presently included in the mitigation conversation even though Hanamaulu River runs through front yard.
There are 8 other proposed sites. The County needs to pursue the others.

[IB Editor's note: Maalo Road is the only way to get to one of the premier visitor destinations on Lauai -Wailua Falls. These dramatic 80-foot waterfalls can be seen from the end Maalo Road and were used in the opening of the television series Fantasy Island. The cliff over the pool once served as a diving platform for the ali`i. After the landfill is sited on Maalo Road all tourists and Kauaians will have to vie with refuge trucks, broken open garbage bags and blowing paper debris to get to the falls.]
.

"New" Kekaha Landfill Decision

SUBHEAD: The county has grappled with siting a new landfill since 988 when then-mayoral-candidate JoAnn Yukimura called the lack of landfill space a crisis.

By Andy Parx on 7 April 2010 in Parx News Daily - (http://parxnewsdaily.blogspot.com/2010/04/pnn-sources-say-mayor-to-announce-new.html)


Image above: Work of grading Kekaha Landfill from county photo records (http://www.kauai.gov/Government/Departments/PublicWorks/SolidWaste/NewLandfillSite/tabid/71/Default.aspx).  

Mayor Bernard Carvalho has told multiple reliable sources that will be announcing the new landfill site on or before April 15 and, according to many, that site is likely to be the one across the highway from the current landfill in Kekaha.

According to reports the previously selected “Umi” site in Kalaheo was “mis-scored” when the fact that it is currently in long term agricultural use by Kaua`i Coffee was not considered and Carvalho has told many community members that he will have an announcement of the new scoring results by April 15. “Discussions continue in regards to the next steps on the landfill siting.

The Mayor is hoping to issue a statement on this matter later this month” according to county spokesperson Mary Daubert who would not confirm the date or the selection of Kekaha.. “Kekaha Mauka” was announced as the site ranked second by a task force earlier this year and a source close to the current process who asked not to be identified told us that it is likely to be the one “selected” on the 15th.

But anyone who thinks that the Kekaha community will be up in arms over environmental justice concerns had better think again.

“I don’t really have any objections” community leader Bruce Pleas told PNN “ as long as the ‘host community benefit (HCB)’ is sufficient and the community buys in”.

Although he thinks that there could be some new more innovative ways to deal with the current and new site he doesn’t think most of the people of Kekaha will object since they have already bought into the concept of being paid by the county for hosting the current landfill. But that presumes problems with the current HCB can be resolved.

Under a current program the county has set up a HCB Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) which is deciding what to do with $650,000 plus another $80,000 in yearly monies designed to compensate the town for the last 57 years of hosting, the first the “dump” and later, the “sanitary landfill”.

The problem is that the money is still under county control according to a source close to the advisory group who asked not to be identified because it is “too controversial a topic and it will take skill and time to assess the broad range of perspectives, attitudes, and feelings emanating from the community of Kekaha”.

The original amount of $650,000.00 which the County Council approved has not yet been "received" by the community, our source told us. “That amount is in the Solid Waste department of the County of Kauai.

The additional amount of $80,000.00 is also with the Solid Waste department. Presumably, an amount will be allocated annually to the community when the landfill is sited, until such time when the County of Kauai decides that no Host Community Benefit Fund will be awarded.”

How the money will be distributed and how the final decision on how to use it will be made remains problematic, with the HCB CAC wanting to make sure that the community gets to make the final decision and the administration wanting to retain final say over how the money is spent.

“As matters now stand... (a)t the last (CAC) meeting, it was decided that some recommendations would be made in writing to the Mayor for the Mayor's consideration as to whether the recommendations should be implemented.

At that meeting, also, a formal request was submitted by the community organization to have the HCB Fund allocation awarded directly to the organization to hold in behalf of the community with the understanding that the HCB Fund CANNOT be expended by the community organization without the approval of the community in determining as to how that fund should be expended.” our source said in an email.

If that issue can be resolved the question remains as to whether the community will buy into hosting the new landfill without some guarantees over how much more money they will receive, how the money will be distributed and their ability to determine how the money will be spent. For his part Pleas wonders whether there isn’t another more innovative way to use the existing footprint. Places on the mainland have been “mining” their old dumps that contain mostly metals, glass and other recyclable items after all the organic waste has decomposed, he said.

 If that were done to the 36 acre closed “phase 1”- using the in-use “cells B and C” for the “mined” non-recyclable materials- we’d have not just have a huge area for a “new” landfill site but could have all of our prior solid waste placed over currently required “liners” to insure against leakage into the water table and ocean, Pleas said.

But that would require implementation of a “zero waste” program which the county council recently nixed in approving a coordinated solid waste approach contained in the latest iteration of the county-funded R.W Beck study.

Also dealing with all the toxic materials- which any long time Kekaha resident will attest were dumped there over the years, especially by the nearby navy base- could make such a project problematic.

The county has grappled with siting a new landfill since at least 1988 when then-mayoral-candidate JoAnn Yukimura called the lack of landfill space a “crisis” that needed immediate attention. .