Showing posts with label Plantations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Plantations. Show all posts

Corporate Colonialism on Kauai

SUBHEAD: Kauai fights back against modern day plantation mentality of GMO-Pestiscide companies.

By Maggie Sergio on 23 September 2013 for Huffington Post -
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maggie-sergio/corporate-colonialism-pes_b_3969102.html)


Image above: Detail of Diego Rivera mural "Gloriosa Victoria" illustrating the U.S. backed overthrow of the Guatemalan government in 1954 to the advantage of United Fruit company. Back then it was all about a corporate monopoly on bananas in Central America. Note Eisenhower face on bomb near dead workers as well as the "corporate type" whispering in a "farmer's" ear while who shakes hand with local politician with pocket full of dollars who is surrounded by military. From (http://swlynch.com/2012/12/01/why-the-u-s-ruined-guatemala-merging-the-cold-war-ethos-and-economic-determinism-as-an-explanation/).

The citizens of Kauai are taking back their power, and it is spectacular to witness. Since my first article on Kauai's battle to protect public health and the environment against covert and excessive pesticide use, a revolution on the Garden Island has started. Unlike the well-publicized revolutions happening around the world today, Kauai's revolution is absent of violence, and rich with the spirit of Aloha.

But don't let the spirit of Aloha mislead you. As Kauai resident and HuffPost blogger Andrea Brower so eloquently conveys in this piece, Aloha is a bond that will not compromise when it comes to public health, and the health of the environment.
"We stand united in Aloha and our love for Kauai. But unity in Aloha never means compromising all of our health and our common air, water and soil. To those corporations who would seek to threaten our entire community simply because we have requested you to be better neighbors, let our voice be heard loud and clear that our aloha on Kauai runs deeper than all the lobbyists and lawyers you can buy." ~ Andrea Brower
What has happened on Kauai after Bill #2491 was introduced on June 30 has been dramatic. It has opened my eyes to the practices of the biotech industry, and it has angered and saddened me. So yes, with this third article, you will notice a definite change in tone. I have learned that anyone who questions the practices of this industry is labeled as anti-science and mocked, many times in a public forum on social media.

 Smear campaigns are launched against anyone who dare question. The blatantly presumptuous and un-aloha conduct of the agrochemical campaign against bill # 2491 has been astounding. I have watched live, three marathon public hearings (each lasting approximately 12 hours in length) and receive updates almost daily from island friends and social media. If you monitored this situation as closely as I have, you would be angry too.


Video above: Edited presntation of Mana March. From (http://youtu.be/3lumLa0pkLA).

Mana March, Sept 8, 2013
On Sunday, Sept 8, 2013, the largest protest event in Kauai's history took place in the capital of Lihue. Over 4000 people marched in support of the passing of bill #2491, an ordinance introduced in June that would require the GMO industry on Kauai to fully disclose what pesticides are being used, and it would require that 500 foot pesticide free buffer zones be implemented around schools, hospitals, waterways and other sensitive areas.

The bill also requires an environmental impact statement be completed, before the industry can expand any further. As mentioned in my previous articles, the GMO industry is fighting any oversight or regulation of their industrial cultivation practices which includes the use of 18 tons of restricted use pesticides annually on the tiny island of Kauai.

The Mana March was broadcast live via a streaming feed online, and covered by AP and other news sources from around the world.


Sept 9th brought the Silent Treatment
At the Aug 5th hearing, it was threats of a lawsuit from the GMO industry. On Monday, Sept 9, the third 12 hour public meeting on bill #2491 was held. Like the previous hearings I watched online, I was glued to my computer. This public hearing heard continued expert and public testimony, in addition to hearing from representatives from the GMO companies on Kauai fighting against bill #2491.

The drama climaxed on September 9, and hit an unbelievable point, when representatives from Syngenta, Dupont Pioneer, BASF and Dow Agrosciences collectively refused to answer questions from Councilmember Gary Hooser. As you can see in the video clip below, Kauai County Councilmember Gary Hooser is asking the GMO companies about possible compromise on each of the provisions of the bill.


Image above: Hooser asks series of questions on areas of compromise by GMO companies. Answer - stoney silence. From (http://youtu.be/5uANLfW6b4k).

The refusal of each of the company representatives to answer questions of an elected government official during a public hearing (especially when inviting the opportunity to negotiate) speaks volumes about the intentions of the industry and the lack of respect for the people of Kauai.

This is what Corporate Colonialism looks like, and the Trojan horse that has snuck onto Kauai after the sugar cane industry collapsed contains 18 tons (used annually) of restricted use pesticides, and an unknown amount of general use and experimental pesticides. This Trojan horse rolled into paradise with stealth precision and now proudly proclaims, "We are feeding the world!"

As freelance journalist and author Adam Skolnick states in his recent Salon article "If the seed can't be grown safely, what does it matter if the corn is safe to eat?"

During the previous public hearing on Aug 5th, the GMO industry displayed their defiance of local government and the legislative process in a different way; with the direct threat of a lawsuit. The video below shows Kauai County Councilmember Ross Kagawa asking lawyers for the GMO companies, "if this bill is passed, will you sue us?" The response from lawyers representing DuPont Pioneer and Syngenta was, "Take that as a given."

There is over $500K of GMO Campaign Donations
I learned early in life that if something doesn't make sense, you need to follow the money. That is just what Hawaii-based nonprofit "Babes against Biotech" has done. Founder, Nomi Carmona has been conducting an audit of the biotech campaign money that saturates the offices of elected officials in Hawaii. The research shows how much money is flowing into the State of Hawaii from the biotech industry. What is interesting is that the research has been made more challenging by the fact that all sorts of silly games are played by the GMO lobbyists including the changing of lobbyist names by one letter, using nicknames, or having the donation come from a spouse or other family member. This is all an attempt to make electronic searches of public information more difficult. All information was obtained from the State of Hawaii

Nomi Carmona summarized the results so far of her audit and you can find that below. So far, $515,775 of GMO money has come from registered lobbyists and this includes money from unregistered lobbyists as well. It is unknown how much soft money has flowed into the state of Hawaii, as these types of gifts are often impossible to track.
"The 2013 Babes Against Biotech analysis assesses the GMO related campaign funds of the Hawaii State House, Senate, Governor, Mayors and County Councils from 2007 to the current filing period, the extent of publicly available records online. We identified a grand total of $515,775 coming directly from GMO companies and registered GMO company lobbyists. A secondary assessment shows money coming in from just three unregistered lobbyist immediate family members, to contribute an additional $31,800. Third degree figures include unregistered GMO company employees, national trade organizations which represent GMO companies and lobbyists employed by Monsanto lobbyists totaling $6,950. The grand totals include only first degree funds filed directly from GMO companies and their documented lobbyists.

Due to dozens of varieties of lobbyist filing names, nicknames, repeated failure to spell their own names and company names correctly, constant swaps of addresses, titles and companies, this has to be performed visually. The neglect to consistently identify themselves means electronic searches will miss many entries. They might omit one letter that removes them from a search under their name but synchronizes them with known addresses on file and versions of their names. For example, numerous 'Monsato' donations from the Monsanto headquarters address.

Our Speaker of the House, Joe Souki tops the representative totals at $16,800, while Senator Michelle Kidani takes the title of Most GMO Funded Senator at $24,550 with Senator Rosalyn Baker, Chair of Consumer Protection close behind. Senate President Donna Kim took $10,650 while Senator Clarence Nishihara, Chair of Agriculture lends $14,412 to the Senate grand total of $198,969.

Only three state senators have taken no 'GMO money,' Russell Ruderman, Laura Thielen and Les Ihara Jr., with only ten of fifty-one State Representatives clear of direct GMO funding. The other forty-one Representatives took $212,081. The Mayoral assessment total shows $18,900 with Honolulu Mayor Kirk Caldwell absorbing the bulk at $11,200. The Council assessments rank Honolulu again, as Most GMO Funded Council to no surprise, receiving $50,725 of $51,425 in all Councils statewide.

Governor Neil Abercrombie received $34,400 of GMO funding directly and an additional $23,800 from three women unregistered as lobbyists, the wives and daughter of the two most giving Monsanto lobbyists, John Radcliffe and George "Red" Morris."
Babes Against Biotech 2013 GMO Campaign Fund Analysis:
Hawaii State Mayoral, $18,900
Hawaii State Senate & House, $411,050
State of Hawaii County Councils, $51,425
Hawaii Governor, $34,400

With this amount of GMO lobby money influencing the State of Hawaii, the conflict of interest is undeniable. The State of Hawaii has not, and will not, take any actions to curtail an industry that is funding them. Protection for the people, environment and wildlife must come at the local level.

And where is the EPA in all of this?
This has been one of my biggest disappointments. When I first shared the unbelievable story about what is happening on Kauai with colleagues and friends, the most common response I got from people was, "Where is the EPA?" "How can they allow this to happen?" Having those very same questions, I reached out to the Office of Pesticide Programs at the EPA, and inquired as to their role in all of this. I shared my two previous articles, highlighting my second article documenting the discovery of pesticides at Waimea Canyon Middle School. I asked the simple question; "How can this be allowed to happen?"

I shared with the EPA this disturbing video testimony and this. The Department of Pesticide Programs didn't respond to my requests for answers but instead referred me to the EPA's press office. After a few pleasant email exchanges over a two-week period I was hopeful that the EPA would express concern over what is happening on Kauai and launch an investigation. I held up publishing this article until I heard their response.

After all, the EPA is chartered with protecting human health and the environment. My illusion was quickly shattered when I received an email that felt as if it had been written by their legal team. My questions about children being exposed to Chlorypifos (which is a violation of the label which is federal law) were not addressed.

With respect to pesticide violations the EPA said this:
In general, the State of Hawaii is responsible for inspection and enforcement when there is a possible violation of federal law related to unlawful use of a pesticide."
However, with $515,575 in GMO campaign donations to elected officials in the State of Hawaii, the integrity of the State of Hawaii has been severely compromised.
Why an Environmental Impact Statement is critical
What is deeply concerning is that the impact to the people, the environment and wildlife from the cultivation practices of the biotech industry is unknown. Events such as children and teachers collapsing during school, in addition to restricted use pesticides found at Waimea Canyon Middle School, unexplained sea urchin die offs in which no one tested for pesticide exposure and a class action lawsuit by the citizens of Waimea are dire symptoms that something is very wrong on Kauai. To postpone any further study is jeopardizing the future of the island and its people.

The State of Hawaii already has one Superfund site due to pesticides, at the old Del Monte plantation on Oahu. This former plantation is still under remediation by the EPA and serves as a reminder to the entire world that industrial agriculture impacts our planet, and the health of our communities.

On Friday, September 27 the fourth Kauai County Council meeting will take place. Either the bill will be passed or deferred once again. Since the bill's introduction on June 30th of this year, there has been a bright light shining on Kauai; the only island in Hawaii that was never conquered by King Kamehameha. In my heart I know that same unconquerable spirit, combined with the energy of Aloha will prevail and support the people of Kauai in their battle against Goliath.

If you want to help the people of Kauai please send your Aloha and support by sharing this article with friends, visiting the Stop Poisoning Paradise website, and signing this petition hosted by the Pesticide Action Network.
Mahalo!

.

KIUC Disinformation Effort

SOURCE: Mark Jeffers (markjeffers@hawaii.rr.com) SUBHEAD: Responses to KIUC's full page Smart meter ad paid for by members, without their input on its message. By Ray Songtree on 16 February 2012 in distributed email - (to KIUC Board and County Council) Image above: Photo of "Smart Meter Free Zone". From (http://www.norad4u.com/knowledge/smart-radiating-meters). In KIUC's full page SmartMeter ad on Feb 15, paid for by we members, without ANY member input into its message, we once again see one sided disinformation. Because millions of people have been subjected to a new invasive technology without informed consent, does not make it worthwhile. Millions received asbestos in their homes and lead in their paint also. Energy conservation can be better had through empowering people with education and choice, not remote control of our appliances and punishing us with tiered rates for using electricity when we come home from work. The WHO quote used is cherry picking. May 31, 2011 – WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer classified RF from cell phones as a 'Possible Human Carcinogen'. The FCC issued warnings on cell phones in 2009. See; (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/27/fcc-now-recommends-precautions-for-cell-phone-use.aspx) Because SmartMeters are always on, sending as much as 190,000 transmission per day, (http://emfsafetynetwork.org/?p=6030) not 8 as KIUC says, they pose the same threat that cell phones do over time. To produce a MESH network, SmartMeters are on 24/7. There are no health conclusions on electromagnetic fields because there have been no long term studies. WHO acknowledges only laboratory studies, not surveys of symptoms and diseases over many years in the population. Our “science” is based on verification through duplication of results. Insurance companies won't cover a disease that has not been 'duplicated' in lab, but that doesn't mean the disease isn't real. Electrosensitivity is new, not a pathogen, but a response to unnatural RF never seen on planet before. Doctors are seeing RF induced disease after ten years of low level exposure and this is why Parliament of Europe adopted the Bio-Initiative Report (www.Bioinitiative.org) on wireless precaution, and why the American Academy of Environmental Medicine have called for ban on SmartMeters. See (http://aaemonline.org/images/CaliforniaPublicUtilitiesCommission.pdf). “Evidence” is a technical term based on standards made up by industry based on the thermal heating of tissue, not on the metabolic effect on living organism. There are no safety standards that measure disruption of cellular reproduction for example. Without this kind of standard, safety studies as they exist now are simply irrelvant and industry knows this. And KIUC already knows this, as they have read letters to TGI, have studied KauaiTruth.Com, and received emails and oral testimony, but KIUC continues with the disinformation. KIUC is willing to hurt a percentage of the people on Kauai. The CCST statement used in ad can be reversed “ There are no studies proving safety” is also true. The CCST report was based on industry sourced data as revealed by Daniel Hirsch. See (http://www.ccst.us/projects/smart2/documents/letter8hirsch.pdf). CCST report is not scientific at all, was not peer reviewed, and therefore, by the criteria of many is worthless. But at least it was honest enough to end with the conclusion that “more studies are needed.” In other words, CCST doesn't know if SmartMeters are safe and neither does KIUC. The FCC quote used in ad repeats the realtity that there have been no conclusive studies. A laboratory cannot quickly reproduce a ten year exposure. Many people get headaches from cell phones, but not one study can reproduce this. KIUC ad is disengenous, misleading, and dangerous, and the employees and management that produced this ad may be criminally liable in future for giving health advice. One of my goals is to save them from this liability. The Environmental Defense Fund is funded by industry and is a double speak name for a rubber stamp tool to make industry look green. In my County Council testimony Feb 8, JoAnn Yukimura was not aware of how foundations are created by industry to look independent, but serve their masters. Here is how EDF describes itself.. "Our organization offers a unique perspective given our proven track record of enabling markets and innovation to gain environmental benefits.” There you have it, the EDF is a PR firm for industry. Their business is selling the brand name called Green. In fact modern technology continues to poison the aina where ever factories exist. See (http://mashable.com/2011/11/16/apple-pollution). KIUC can offer NO security with smart meters because they don't own the software and have no idea what it is capable of. Period. Washington, D.C., August 14, 2011 — Former CIA director James Woolsey;
“They’re constructing a smart grid that will make it easier for you or me to call our homes on our cell phones and turn down our air conditioner on a hot afternoon. But that may well mean that a hacker in Shanghai can do the same thing with his cell phone, or worse. A so-called smart grid that’s as vulnerable as what we’ve got is not smart at all. It’s a really, really stupid grid.”
Opt Out program will not protect anyone from the neighbor's wireless RF effects. Insects and plants won't be protected either. Those in apartments with dozens of meters won't benefit from opting out. A moratorium on rollout is necessary and if KIUC needs to break its contract on using SmartMeters they can do so legally by claiming they were disinformed about health effects. The community will back KIUC and we will have unity and trust. David Bissell, CEO of KIUC makes over $330,000 a year. He is buttressing up his own decisions here, and the entire ad lacks objectivity. Not offering objectivity keeps people dumbed down. Shame on KIUC for this plantation approach to its own ohana. Those wanting a good overview on SmartMeters might want to read this article; (http://emfsafetynetwork.org/?page_id=872) KIUC could never ever counter it. Read it and know the truth about Smart Meters. We need regime change at KIUC. I especially urge the Filipino community to NOT vote for incumbents running for Board. My daughter is half Filipino. We need new faces at KIUC and a new heart.
Emerging suit against KIUC By Adam Asquith on 16 February 2012 in distributed email - (in response to Ray Songtree email)

I found out the the DOE issued themselves a categorical exemption from the NEPA process for their money for Smartmeters. THis can be challenged but I want to now spend my time filing a class action lawsuit against KIUC for invasion of privacy and other civil rights violations. There was successful lawsuit in Maine that at least forced an opt-out. Please let other members now that I am working on a suit and would welcome multiple claimants.

See also:

Anti Smart Meter Group Seeks Federal Injunction (http://naperville.patch.com/articles/smart-meter-group-seeks-federal-injunction#video-8809603)

In Illinois, members of the Naperville Smart Meter Awareness group gathered at the city of Naperville's Municipal Center Friday afternoon to announce that the group has filed for injunctive relief in federal court.

The group and its attorney Doug Ibendahl were on hand to answer questions from a group comprised mostly of supporters of the organization. Members of the group explained the reason for the court filing and also stated that Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan is also investigating the city of Naperville for open meeting violations, among other violations.

Members of the audience were allowed to ask questions, many of which were centered around whether the group had approached the city and shared its concerns. Some also asked what they might do to keep the new meters from being installed at their homes.

The city of Naperville, according to its information, has stated that the smart meter installation will begin the first week in January.

Ibendahl said he was not certain how quickly the federal court would take to hear the complaint, but said that the group didn't seek a temporary restraining order because the members of the group are reasonable people and they hoped that the city would "do the right thing."

The group has sought to have a question placed on the ballot in March, which would ask voters: Shall the city of Naperville immediately and permanently stop the implementation of the $22 million smart meter project and dismantle all related equipment?” Earlier this week, the group learned that a resident had filed an objection to the question and a hearing is scheduled for next week.

One member of the audience asked if the group had filed the complaint in federal court as retribution for the objection filed earlier this week. The members said said that was not the reason.

Ibendahl said that the members felt they had exhausted all of their options after attempting to talk with the city and felt that filing in federal court was their last resort.

The city of Naperville issued a news release about 15 minutes prior to the group's news conference. In it the city said that the opposition will not stop the city from moving forward with the smart meter installations.

“We are confident that the case will ultimately be dismissed by the court system,” City Attorney Margo Ely said in the release. “The Smart Meter Awareness Group has pursued their opposition to the city’s project in multiple forums, including frequent appearances at City Council meetings, numerous FOIA requests, appeals to the Attorney General and now a federal lawsuit. The lawsuit raises no new issues from the opposition. It simply has no merit.”

For more information on the Naperville Smart Meter Awareness group visit its website at www.NapervilleSmartMeterAwareness.org. To learn more from the city of Naperville on the Naperville Smart Grid Initiative, visit www.napervile.il.us/smartgrid.aspx.

Video above: announcement by Naperville Smart Meter Awareness. From (http://naperville.patch.com/articles/smart-meter-group-seeks-federal-injunction#video-8809603). .

Grove Farms' house environmentalist

SUBHEAD: Being in bed with Grove Farms leads one to do ugly things - even an "environmentalist". By Andy Parx on 14 February 2011 for Parx News Network - (http://parxnewsdaily.blogspot.com/2011/02/its-my-party-and-ill-whine-if-i-want-to.html) Image above: Mahaulepu terrain floats over southside breakers. From (https://picasaweb.google.com/mjwanat/Kauai#5416686298576987378). You wouldn’t know it from a visit but for well over 30 years war has raged at Maha`ulepu- the moniker used to describe last stretch of undeveloped coastline on the otherwise tourist-trampled South Shore of Kaua`i. It hasn’t been because Grove Farm hasn’t tried and tried and tried again. After a contested case hearing before the planning commission in the late 70’s failed to stop the golf course at the Hyatt, people became more and more concerned that the rest of the coastline would soon become another of those “beaches they sell to build their hotel” unless people organized a permanent effort to preserve the area. So a decade later Malama Maha`ulepu formed to provide a permanent presence to make sure that Grove Farm’s plans would be permanently back-burnered. This weekend the hostilities flared once again over a seemingly innocuous upcoming event at the nearby Makauwahi Cave where archeologists David and Lida Pigott Burney have been conducting their study of the “sinkhole” for the last decade plus. When Professor Burney first made his “discovery” those seeking to preserve the area had hopes that it would become just one more reason to preserve the area. But over the years Burney has, according to most preservationists, became anything but an ally, instead crawling in bed with Grove Farm whenever possible, toeing the company line and doing anything and everything they asked as long as he could maintain “his” dig. The problems of his possessiveness and need to be cozy with Grove Farm (GF) have put him at odds with some of the goals of Malama Maha`ulepu (MM) before but this weekend he inexplicably exploded when a poster and notice about his “appreciation celebration” was forwarded to MM’s members. It seemed innocent enough and rather innocuous. The widely distributed email with an attached a “pdf” of a poster promoting the event opened by saying:
Please join us on Sunday, March 6, 2011 at 2pm in the Makauwahi Cave at Maha`ulepu for an appreciation celebration. This appreciation day is in recognition of the thousands of people who have volunteered over the last two decades to help nurture the Makauwahi Cave Reserve to life!
It then described the program’s entertainment, recognitions and remembrances and gave directions- all information straight from the poster- giving the Burney’s email and phone “for more information.” But apparently they ticked of Burney by ending it with:
Mahalo, Malama Maha`ulepu PO Box 658 Koloa, HI 96756 malama-mahaulepu.org follow us on facebook at Malama Maha`ulepu
(Full disclosure: we have volunteered with Malama Maha`ulepu many times.) That elicited a scathing letter from Burney giving his “apologies” and complaining that MM was usurping his little party to honor his wife who has the job as “manager of the Makauwahi Cave Reserve.” Nowhere did the letter say it was an MM sponsored event. And the poster didn’t even have MM’s name on it. Then why? Well it would do an injustice to excerpt his letter explaining why he needs to keep his lips firmly affixed to Grove Farm’s butt. MM distributed his letter that said:
Dear friends, It is with regret that Lida and I have to circulate this message, but we feel it is very important to make something clear: the invitation that you received today from Malama Maha`ulepu implies that they are the sponsors of an “Appreciation Day” event at Makauwahi Cave March 6. They re-named our poster file (sent out originally as “poster.pdf” to “mm.poster.makauwahi.appreciation” and attached a letter that would give anybody who didn’t know better the impression that they are the organizers of this event. They emphatically ARE NOT, and this is why it matters: Grove Farm employees have been invited to this event, as well as our “neighbors” down there – other Grove Farm leaseholders. I know with certainty that these folks, who have all played a big role in making our project possible at the cave over the last 20 years, do not support some of the positions espoused by the Malama Maha`ulepu organization, and will not attend if the illusion is perpetrated in the community that this is an MM-sponsored event. MM members and in fact everybody is welcome at this event, but we are not seeking their co-sponsorship as this could understandably cause our project great harm by souring the cordial relationship we have with our landlord, Grove Farm, and with many others in the community. We have always strived to maintain neutrality in the sometimes heated political issues down there, and do not wish our efforts hampered by direct association with the advocacy of MM or any other group. Our mission is to research, restore, and interpret Makauwahi Cave, that is all. As long as Grove Farm continues to entrust the property to our care, we intend to make everybody welcome regardless of their political views or group affiliations. Again, our apologies, David A. Burney Lida Pigott Burney
Ooooo- a little touchy aren’t we. Wonder why. Maybe because over the years the Burneys have taken advantage of MM’s preservation efforts to publicize his project which almost always receives a prominent display at MM tabling and events. As a matter of fact their PR efforts have been the chief way his project been publicized locally. Even though the MM letter didn’t even intimate it was theirs Burney felt the need to make perfectly clear that, despite his claim that he’s “strived to maintain neutrality in the sometimes heated political issues down there” he has indeed, as his words indicate, always supported GF in their endeavors as long as they leave his little kuleana in Maha`ulepu alone. Malama Maha`ulepu has only one mission- to preserve and preserve access to the whole region, including “the Burneys’” cave. Burney on the other hand is okay with letting Grove Farm use him to drive a wedge between preservation efforts for the entire area and preservation of his own private- and by the way, very profitable- venture. Grove Farm continues to covet Maha`ulepu if not as a place of future development- due predominantly to MM’s vigilance- as leverage for development elsewhere. By refusing to support preservation of anything but his own enterprise Burney erodes the efforts of the community at large to eventually fulfill the vision of a permanent Maha`ulepu preserve. Like the missionary Wilcox family that founded Grove Farm, the Burneys came to Kaua`i to do good and have done very well indeed. .

Plantation of the Mind

SUBHEAD: The plantation economy's most valuable colony is the one in our minds.
Image above: Colonel Sander's Chinese plantation security forces. From (http://kelleyiskobe.com/?p=502). By Charles Hugh Smith on 25 August 2010 in Of Two Minds - (http://www.oftwominds.com/blogaug10/plantation-of-the-mind08-10.html)

All plantation economies rely on exploiting colonies not just for materials and labor, but as controlled markets for the home economy's products.

Thus Great Britain imposed restrictions on cotton weaving in India, forcing its colonial citizens to buy cloth produced by the home country's factories.

As I explain in the Survival+ / Survival+ The Primer chapter entitled The Crisis of Neoliberal (Predatory) Global Capitalism, global capitalism has reached the limit of the colonial/plantation model in terms of exploiting new colonies around the globe and subjugating their materials and markets to the purposes of home country domination and profit.

From this point of view, China and India are the last major "colonies" to be exploited, as they provide products and information-technology (IT) services at low cost, keeping modest slices for themselves while enabling the home countries' corporations to reap premium profits on the quasi-colonial output.

Thus Foxconn, which manufactures Apple devices, pays its workers roughly $200-$300 per month and earns a few percentage points profit--a few dollars at best on each Apple device. Meanwhile, Apple routinely skims gross profits of 40% or more on all its products.

This is the modern model of a plantation/colonial economy; much of the productive assets in China are owned by overseas Chinese (Taiwan) or other overseas corporations (Japan, Korea, U.S., E.U., etc.). This is the classic overseas planation model in which cheap labor and materials are exploited and waste products are dumped in the colonies.

As the limits of colonialization became increasingly visible, Global Predatory Capitalism had no market left to exploit but its home populace.

It did this in two ways:

1. It purchased the Central State's partnership in privatizing the profits from rampant speculation and financial leverage--i.e. the "financial innovations" which have strip-mined the middle class of their assets--while spreading the risks and losses from this speculative fraud onto the taxpayers, i.e. the public.

2. It deployed increasingly invasive marketing to colonize the minds of the home country citizenry, effectively brainwashing them into "consumers" who bought into the fantasy of ever-rising real estate and the dubious notion that debt could expand forever as long as the Central State kept credit cheap.

One of the key concepts in the Survival+ critique is the politics of experience. This is an elusive concept because what we take for granted is invisible to us, and we have to go back in time, so to speak, to rediscover a history in which the experience of daily life was quite different from the present.

Today, we accept it as "normal" that marketing worms into every once-private area of our lives. Not that long ago, adverts and marketing were limited to print media (newspapers and magazines) -- fundamentally passive media.

With the advent of radio, adverts could push national brands via broadcast. Yet even this new medium was nowhere near as dominated by marketing as the present. Adverts came on every half-hour between radio programs.

Now we expect (and get) multiple adverts every six minutes on commercial TV.

The landline telephone was the standard medium for interpersonal communication. The only adverts related to the "Ma Bell" (AT&T) regulated phone network were in the phone book, and these were highly valued by marketers as one of the few propaganda/marketing vectors which reached into the privacy of every home.

Contrast that relatively protected home with today's shrinking zone of privacy. Now email has adverts, and text-based adverts on cellphones are the "New Frontier" of invasive marketing.

The key concept in all marketing now is supremely pernicious: any advert or campaign which reaches deep into the last refuges of privacy is considered highly valuable.

A passive print advert has lost its ability to influence; the "gold standard" is a campaign which violates the last remaining refuges of privacy--communications with friends via the Web and the telephone.

Where the only public adverts were once billboards, now there are adverts on the shopping carts in the supermarket--another violation of what could be considered temporary private space--and on the floor of the supermarket. Even the rubber dividers used to separate one's own purchases from the next customers now display an advert.

The colonialization of the plantation of the mind is now complete. It is not coincidental that those citizens who watch the most TV are also the biggest buyers of junk food and its accompanying junk worldview based on consumption, faux novelty ("get the new chicken-bacon-cheese-double-burger today!") and a passive disengagement from the real world: for example, cooking real food, raising real food, sharing the preparation of real food with others as an activity, teaching your kids some useful skills at home ("that's the school's job"), etc.

Passive absorption of marketing-dominated media is the primary activity on the plantation of the mind, and that of course is the goal of the colonial overlords: distraction, passivity, confusion, "divide and conquer," and the old stand-by, financial desperation.

The Plantation economy has conquered a substantial percentage of the minds of home-country "consumers." (They were once citizens, but the main stream media has brainwashed them into the chattel known as "consumers.") Now that this internal mono-culture of marketing dominates the populace, exploitation as per the plantation/colonial model can proceed along a slightly modernized pathway.

As in any plantation/colonial economy, the real profits are skimmed by the predatory global corporations and the Central State which enables their domination. Very little flows down to the bottom 95%.

As in any plantation/colonial economy, restive elements will be suppressed, marginalized, undermined or co-opted.

As I mentioned yesterday, I worked on a real plantation, and the paternal aspects were quite seductive. As long as you did the work expected of you, life was pretty good; housing was subsidized, and the company maintained the town.

The internal plantation is less well tended and less paternalistic; just buy the junk we're pushing, and what happens to you afterward is your problem.

Experience itself has become so derealized that we don't even recognize our minds have been colonized into neatly internalized plantations. See also:

.

.

Plantation Economy of Wal-Mart

SUBHEAD: The tyranny of "low prices" is a characteristic of a plantation economy which strip-mines local economies.
Image above: Mashup of the The Oak Alley Plantation in Louisiana by Juan Wilson. From (http://fr.academic.ru/dic.nsf/frwiki/1221812). By Charles Hugh Smith on 25 August 2010 in Of Two Minds - (http://www.oftwominds.com/blogaug10/walmart-plantation08-10.html)

I am probably one of the few Americans who has worked on an honest-to-goodness plantation: I picked "pine" on the Dole Pineapple plantation on the Hawaiian island of Lanai in 1970. (The plantation was subsequently closed and production moved to the Phillipines to take advantage of lower labor costs.) Thus my understanding of the plantation economy that I describe in Survival+ is not merely academic.

Wal-Mart is the quintessential plantation in the U.S. and global economies. Like a classic agricultural-commodity plantation, Wal-Mart enters a region and market with a diverse, employment-rich ecology of small businesses and networked supply chains of local and regional manufacturers and distributors, and it bulldozes the entire "forest" of businesses, suppliers and distributors with the irresistable blade of global supply chains and "lower prices, always."

The original sugar king, Claus Spreckels, pioneered the integrated global plantation economy of scale: he owned the plantations which grew the sugar cane, the ships used to export the cane and the refineries which processed it for distribution to global markets.

He also imported uncomplaining, cheap (i.e. desperately poor) labor to provide the heavy work required.

Wal-Mart doesn't have to own the suppliers or distributors or the ships--it's great size gives it supreme pricing power and the ability to offer suppliers a simple yet stark choice: either lower your price to our price-point or we pull your contract, and you implode. You may survive as a much smaller business, but probably not.

Like a plantation, Wal-Mart extracts wealth via mono-cultures and an integrated structure and supply chain. Wal-Mart's model calls for selected global suppliers-- the monocultures who make millions of specific items-- to provide massive quantities of goods at Wal-Mart prices, meaning that small suppliers get squeezed out by their inability to scale up to meet Wal-Mart's demands for product.

Profitable suppliers are squeezed to the break-even point (or below) by Wal-Mart's continuous demands for ever-lower costs. In effect, Wal-Mart expropriates the profits of all its suppliers and distributors in the entire chain.

A Wal-Mart store quickly bulldozes the complex economic ecology of local businesses. Small business is both the engine of job creation and a highly employment-rich ecology. Wal-Mart crushes this ecology and replaces it with a low-job, low-pay, highly efficient plantation economy in which the townpeople's only choice is to work for Wal-Mart or scrape out a living feeding the Wal-Mart workers, doing their laundry, etc - exactly as on a classic plantation.

On a classic plantation, the wages are low and the "company store" offers easy credit, binding the workers to the corporation not just for wages but for credit and goods.

Those few who manage to save up enough capital to start small service businesses-- laundry, cafes, etc.--must do so in the shadow of the Company, which can always drive them out of business should they irritate their corporate overlords.

A once-diverse landscape is reduced to a monoculture wasteland dependent on subsidies, either implicit or explicit. Wal-Mart's low wages leave many of its workers' families on state aid or food stamps to survive, and so it prospers on the backs of taxpayers who subsidize its low wages.

A relative handful of local workers run the plantation, while the economy the plantation bulldozed offered more jobs and a wider range of jobs.

Here is an example from real life. We shop for groceries in Chinatown or "Mexican" markets (in quotes because we do not know the national origins of the workers or owners) because we find the produce to be fresher and cheaper than supermarket chain stores.

A typical full-service market in Chinatown (not the tourist Chinatown, the real one) is small by U.S. standards--perhaps 4,000 square feet compared to 40,000 square feet for an old supermarket and 120,000 square feet for a "superstore."

In this small space one finds a full meat, poultry and fish counter with three butchers on hand, a full panoply of vegetables and fruit (usually placed on the sidewalk every morning) and aisles of canned goods, beverages, dried fruits, etc.

Each small store has over a dozen employees.

If you stop to examine the boxes of fruit, vegetables and meat which are being carted in by hand, you will see a wide range of local produce from family farms and local suppliers.

Next door, the bakery has several salespeople at the counter and several bakers in the back. The deli next door to the bakery has four clerks and four or five cooks/staff preparing food in the small kitchen.

Thus this modest bit of square footage supports dozens of jobs, pays rent to several landlords (further distributing the revenues) and multiple owners/managers. In addition, dozens of small suppliers and farms receive a share of the revenues.

This is the ecology of classical capitalism, in which competition yields a rich variety of goods, services, prices - and wages. Not everyone is capable of learning high-wage skills in a world of global wage arbitrage, and the wages in small-scale markets are modest. But this ecology offers plentiful opportunities for career changes and entrepreneurship--something the global plantation only offers within its corporate mono-culture.

The plantation-economy is one of concentrated financial and political power, global scale, exported jobs, integrated supply chains which exclude small local enterprises and a predatory monopoly which vacuums up all the profits of the entire supply chain for itself.

The alternative is not some fantasy of "old-time America"--this model still exists where citizens refuse to submit to the mono-tyranny of "low prices." Long-time readers know that my experiences with Wal-Mart are limited to attempting to buy something of utility with a store credit issued for a gift we could not use.

The Wal-Mart Model of Self-Destruction: Lowest Prices, Always (January 24, 2010)

When my wife attempted to return an item of unusably poor quality, the clerk just shrugged and said, "It's Wal-Mart." In other words, poor quality is to be expected along with "low" prices.

Mono-culture plantations like Wal-Mart are ugly and soul-draining. There is nothing charming or life-affirming in the cavernous stores or wide aisles. People are enervated by the deadening atmosphere; they shuffle forward in line like zombies, and the pall of mono-culture "low prices" offers zero opportunity for amusement or fun.

Street markets (indoor and outdoor) offer plentiful, free opportunities for amusement and diversion, and ones like Porte de Clignancourt in Paris and Chatuchak Market in Bangkok are famous precisely because they are fun and hugely diverse--and offer plenty of bargains to shoppers.

The communities which support local economic ecologies do so not because they dislike low prices, but because the mono-culture plantation of Wal-Mart doesn't offer everything they want, nor is it convenient or enjoyable.

The nation does not exist to benefit corporations--the corporations exist to benefit the nation and its citizenry--and not just with cartels and plantations. Isn't it odd how this statement--The nation does not exist to benefit corporations--the corporations exist to benefit the nation and its citizenry--sounds breathtakingly revolutionary in today's plantation politics of experience?

Thus not shopping at big-box plantation stores is as revolutionary an act as preparing your own food, growing your own garden and eating a household meal together.

Follow up: Wal-Mart and the Plantation Economy: correspondent P.W.D. submitted this account of his experience as a seasonal employee of Wal-Mart:

I have just read your essay on Wal-Mart and the Plantation Economy and wanted to share what I learned working this summer at my local Wal-Mart in a seasonal job since I am retired and needed to supplement my income because of the Ben Bernanke economy.

You are right that just walking into a Wal-Mart not only transforms one into a zombie but also lowers one's IQ by at least 25 points. I had not realized how many uneducated people really make up this country's population as evidenced by the typical Wal-Mart shopper. The customers shuffle along playing with their cellphones, shuffling their feet along the floor like they are medicated and staring blankly into the dull aisles of cheap Chinese junk.

The working conditions are horrible and no employee is treated as a human being; they are just a number on a computer. Also, employees are hired and fired literally on a moment's notice so the turnover is never ending. This keeps them from filing unemployment claims thus saving the company more money.

Oh and one more item. If it were not for the EBD and WIC programs that supplement many of their customers food supplies, I think Wal-Mart would lose at least 30 percent of their business. So basically Wal-Mart is being subsidized by the federal government

.

End of Kauai's Economy

SUBHEAD: There is are good reasons why our agland is disappearing to GMO corn, vacation rentals, and billionaires MacMansions. Image above: Detail of painting by Diego Rivera of work on a sugarcane plantation, 1931. From (http://www.abcgallery.com/R/rivera/rivera139.html). By Juan Wilson on 7 July 2010 - Roll back the clock forty or fifty years, and the economy of Kauai was built on a foundation of sugarcane and vacation resorts. There was nascent private and public service industry and a smattering of military related jobs, but the bulk of the money coming to the island was from tourism and agriculture. GMO Corn replaces sugarcane Then bad things happened. Sugar production was already on the wane, but operations like Gay & Robinson plugged away as if that would get turned around. It didn't. The introduction in 1985 of New Coke using corn syrup to replace cane sugar signaled the end for sugarcane on Kauai. It also was the starting gun on the economic bonanza of GMO production. GMO corn companies are not in the food production business. They are chemical companies. They are experimenting with the genes of mass produced crops to control them, control who buys them and attach a dependence on their chemicals to these industrial crops. They make crops which are dependent on their pesticides to germinate, and which are tolerant to their pesticides. Their seeds have a terminator gene, so do not reproduce. Therefore you have to buy seeds again each season. They hold patents on their genetically modified crops, and they prosecute any farmer whose crops contain their genes, even if the farmer is not responsible for the infestation of his crop with these genes. The primary ingredient to the chemistry, energy sources, and soil needed for what they do is petroleum. Companies like Syngenta, Dow, Dupont, etc. They now control the agland once used by the cane plantations of the westside and are continuing to grow. They are the new plantation barons. They are building a partnership with the US military and its subcontractors (ITT, Raytheon, general Dynamics, etc.) to limit access and control circumstances on the westside of Kauai. Tourism for the Wealthy Tourism continued to be a mainstay of our economy. There were a few blips along the way: West coast dock strike, OPEC oil crisis, Reagan Recession, etc. Tourism was not just for the rich anymore. By the 1970s it was something the middle class could do en masse. Jumbo 747s began overseas flights - and quickly became cattlecars in the sky. Destination resorts were available to service suburban families needing a week in paradise. Twenty-five years later, in 1997, when I returned to Kauai for a visit (and to introduce the island to my family) we did not even inquire about hotel accommodations. We looked for a house rental in Poipu. At that time it was $2,000/month for a two bedroom near the beach. That was significantly better than renting two resort hotel rooms for a month. In 2001, when we moved here permanently, that same house was renting for north of $4,000/month... still a bargain. There is a compelling reason house rentals are preferred to hotels for many visitors that come to our island. That will not be changing soon. However, since September 11, 2001, commercial aviation, and middleclass tourism has been on a death watch. It has gotten to be a nightmare to pass through the gauntlet of "Homeland Security" checks needed to get on a plane going anywhere. In addition, the airlines cannot make money with the present cost of fuel. The only way they can eke out supplementary income is to eliminate meals, charge you for a pillow or carry-on bag. They want you to stay in your seat and not complain. That is a far cry from my first trip, in 1972, on a 747 from Honolulu to San Francisco where we were pampered by appealing stewardessses and the front of the plane had an open bar with a lounge singer at a small electric piano. I think flying is going to get so much worse that commercial aviation as we know it will end. Those flying from here to the mainland will be the rich going by charter or private jets. The rest of us will be lucky to ride a ship in steerage. All this, in effect, will suck the joy out of a trip to paradise for a week for middle income families. Tourism will become a high-end pleasure reserved for the rich. Most of these tourists will be looking at longer stays away from the rabble. Isolated homes on beachfront and rural meadows (agland) with great views and amenities will be preferred. Have you noticed how the farm workers housing legislation has been shoved aside and linked to re-examining vacation rental legislation for agland? Guys like councilman Jay Furfaro, who managed resorts for a career, know that the Kauai hotel business is going away. He thinks we need a transformation of the business to accommodate visitors Billionaire Bunker Down Lastly, we are in the middle of an invasion of billionaires who have plundered the world and, now that things are in an advanced stage of eco-collapse, are seeking a place to alight to escape the coming hard times. They want large plots of semi-tropical land that can sustain them with lots of same minded people nearby, and with a service class to provide them comforts. We wrote back in 2005 in "Bunker Mentality of the Rich":

"Feel the anxiety of even the most privileged Sunbelters as they see increasing chaotic natural forces pummeling even the richest enclaves as the effects of global warming begin to kick-in.

Sense the thirst for unrenewable resources (i.e. water) in places like Imperial Valley, Phoenix, Tucson, Las Vegas and most of the mountainous yuppie-extreme-sport west.

Share the worry about crime, depression, child-safety, terrorism, sex-offenders, ethnic minorities, school violence, ID theft and cosmetic surgery that seems to fill the minds of America's well-heeled suburbanites. When you do you'll know why so many (that have made a financial killing on the mainland) now want to hunker down in paradise. Back on the mainland they are beginning to smell the smoke of an oncoming economic melt-down, and they want a safe place to run and hide.The rich are bunkering down here!"

After renting a few houses on Kauai over the years, some of the fabulously wealthy are reconsidering their escape move to Costa Rica or Paraguay and looking a a little chunk of the US that's isolated, where English is spoken, and the US military as a strategic interest in defending: Kauai. These people know better than we that the crash is coming. They are the ones who have had their hands on the industrial steering wheel. I suspect if this trend continues there will be a new order of business on our island. A kind of feudal/plantation organization backed up by the military and a few global corporations. If they want the agland here they will simply take it. Our humble county government, without a clue of any alternative, will gladly play lapdog. Only a serious de-industrialization process may stand in their way. Then we can build an economy founded on organic, sustainable agriculture that could export the 3 C's: coffee, cacao and cannabis. See also: Ea O Ka Aina: Message from DOW GMO 6/29/10 Ea O Ka Aina: Potash King's Palace 6/24/10 Ea O Ka Aina: Bunker Mentality of Rich 6/25/05 .