Showing posts with label Bombing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bombing. Show all posts

Australia suspends Syria overflights

SUBHEAD: Australia became the first coalition member to suspend flights in Syria, claiming it's too dangerous for its planes.

By Tyler Durden on 20 June 2017 for Zero Hedge -
(http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-20/australia-halts-flights-syria-citing-potential-threats-russia)


Image above: Royal Australian Air Force flying American made F18 Hornets began making their first strike on Islamic State forces in Syria in September 2015. From (http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2015/09/09/first-raaf-strikes-syria-within-week).

Russia’s Monday decision to suspend a memorandum of cooperation with the US-led coalition in retaliation after a US jet shot down a Syrian Army plane has rattled some US allies, who fear escalating tensions between Russia and the coalition. In what it called a "precautionary measure," Australia became the first coalition member to suspend flights in Syria, claiming it's too dangerous for its planes to fly without the agreement, according to BBC.
“As a precautionary measure, Australian Defense Force (ADF) strike operations into Syria have temporarily ceased,” Australia’s Department of Defense said in a statement, adding its operations in Iraq would continue as part of the coalition.”



“ADF personnel are closely monitoring the air situation in Syria and a decision on the resumption of ADF air operations in Syria will be made in due course.”



“Australian Defense Force protection is regularly reviewed in response to a range of potential threats,” the Department of Defense said.
Australia has deployed about 780 military personnel as part of the US-led coalition fighting the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria

The BBC notes that Australia has a small but highly capable contingent of six F/A-18 strike aircraft; a tanker; and an E-7A Wedgetail early warning aircraft, all based at Al Minhad in the United Arab Emirates.

Most of the Australian strikes have been in Iraq, though its aircraft do also operate over Syria. Australian commanders will reassess the situation in due course. The more fundamental question is what the Russian threat actually amounts to. Is it just rhetoric or does Moscow want to deny certain areas of Syrian airspace to US-led coalition aircraft?

Australian aircraft will continue to fly missions in Iraq.As reported yesterday, Russia suspended cooperation under the “Memorandum on the Prevention of Incidents and Ensuring Air Safety in Syria” on Monday after the US shot down a Syrian Army fighter jet. 

The Russian Defense ministry called the attack “an act of aggression,” on the part of the US-led coalition. The US military neglected to use a communication line with Russia concerning this attack, despite the fact that Russian warplanes were also on a mission in Syrian airspace at the time, the Russian Defense Ministry alleged, conflicting with the Pentagon's explanation of events.

The bilateral memorandum of understanding was signed between the United States and Russia signed in October 2015 to ensure the safety of flights during combat missions over Syria.

In retaliation for the US attack, the ministry warned that Russian missile defense would intercept any aircraft in the area of operations of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria.

The Russian Defense Ministry announced, quoted by Sputnik;
"In areas where Russian aviation is conducting combat missions in the Syrian skies, any flying objects, including jets and unmanned aerial vehicles of the international coalition discovered west of the Euphrates River will be followed by Russian air and ground defenses as air targets."
Contrary to the earlier statement by the US, according to which it "contacted its Russian counterparts by telephone via an established "de-confliction line" to de-escalate the situation and stop the firing", Russia claims the US-led coalition command didn't use the deconfliction channel with Russia to avoid an incident during an operation in Raqqa:
"Russian Aerospace Forces' jets were conducting operations in Syrian airspace that time. However, the command of the coalition forces didn't use the existing channel between the air command of the Qatari airbase al Udeid and the [Russian] Hmeymim airbase to avoid incidents over Syria."
We now wait to see which other US allies – Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands, France, Jordan and the UK also are contributing men and arms to the task of "liberating" Syria  – will announce that they're temporarily pulling out of the conflict until tensions once again de-escalate.


.

"Mother Of All Blowback"

SOURCE: Katherine Muzik PHD (kmuzik@gmail.com)
SUBHEAD: Trump dropped the “Mother Of All Bombs” on Nangarhar province in Afghanistan.

By Faisil Kutty on 20 April 2017 for Toronto Star -
(https://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2017/04/20/trumps-bombings-may-elicit-the-mother-of-all-blowback-editorial.html)


Image above: For Trump the bywords are not "Hopey Changey" but "Dopey Crazy". From (https://www.freelancer.hk/contest/Alter-some-Images-611716.html).

Rather than stopping the next lone attacker in the homeland, American bombings will motivate activists. Instead of weakening resistance, it will bring together sworn enemies against a common bigger enemy.

Years ago, a young man was interviewed by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) at my office. He was flagged for his “anti-Canadian” views for opposing Ottawa’s involvement in Afghanistan.

He had left Canada as an ardent supporter of Western intervention, but returned a security “threat” for his opposition.

Extended family and friends killed or injured as “collateral damage” was the game changer. Intended or unintended, the dead are no less dead because we meant well, he observed. His story of radicalization is not unique.

“With respect, you cannot continue to behave as if innocent deaths like those in my family are irrelevant,” wrote Faisal bin Ali Jabar in a letter addressed to then president Barack Obama in 2014. Jabar, who lost two relatives in a 2012 drone strike in Yemen, hit the target when he concluded, “you will defeat your own counterterrorism aims.”

The logic applies to all bombings where civilians inevitably pay a steep price, often with their lives. These sentiments echo across the Muslim world where too often bombs drop more frequently than rain.

Of course, the consequences of Western actions will not stay “there.” In fact, the reverberations from the “collateral damage” are and will continue to be felt “here” in the West. Indeed, numerous studies have confirmed that death and destruction in the Muslim world is a major recruiting tool.

Court transcripts from the infamous Toronto 18 case, for instance, show that almost all of the youth charged with “plotting” terrorist attacks in Ontario in 2006 were shaken to the core by the suffering they saw.

As the Star’s Michelle Shephard reported last year in a 10-year follow up story on some of the convicted: “They opposed the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, rallying not against the West’s rights and freedoms but because they believed those rights weren’t applied equally to Muslims.”

As clear as this cause and effect calculus is, too many in positions of power just don’t get it. Or perhaps they don’t want to.

Indeed, last week the U.S. dropped the GBU 43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB), dubbed the “mother of all bombs,” on Nangarhar province in Afghanistan. In doing so the Trump administration had to drop the “mother of all lies” as well. The bomb, sold as a precise munition that can be surgically placed on the doorsteps of the bad guys, and only the bad guys, is far from this.

Laser- or satellite-guided bombs and weapons systems may hit their intended targets for the most part. But technical glitches and human error often mean civilians and allies also pay dearly.

The sheer size and damage range is another factor. Weighing 21,600 pounds, the MOAD is the largest non-nuclear ordnance, which can kill and damage buildings within a 2.7-km radius. It causes deafness within a 3.2-km area and God only knows what else. Such a device is far from precise.

Media reports claim 96 Daesh fighters were killed but U.S. officials are mum and have not allowed anyone into the area.

How can something with such a broad point of impact be so precisely targeted when the area hit was home to thousands of non-combatants? How can officials be so sure that the bomb avoided children orphaned by previous attacks by the good guys or by Daesh and the Taliban? Will we ever learn the real human and long-term cost?

This bombing of one of the poorest, most unstable and war-ravaged countries in the world, is yet more proof that the US counterterrorism strategy is short-sighted, based on questionable assumptions, and risks escalating conflicts and increasing instability both at home and abroad.

Sadly, a generation of Canadians and Americans have also only known the parallel world view of “us” versus “them.” This dichotomous outlook only serves to radicalize many in both camps by dehumanizing the other and fuelling perpetual war. Extreme violence whether by state or non-state actors begets only more violence and fuels the vicious cycle.

Rather than stopping the next lone attacker in the homeland, these bombing runs will motivate many more. Instead of weakening the enemy, it will bring together sworn enemies against a common bigger enemy.

As former U.S. Congressman Dennis Kucinich wrote: “It is precisely because we have chosen to fight ‘them’ over there that we will have to fight ‘them’ over here. If we roam the world looking for dragons to slay, some will follow us home.”

• Faisal Kutty is counsel to KSM Law, an associate professor at Valparaiso University Law School in Indiana and an adjunct professor at Osgoode Hall Law School. @faisalkutty.

.

What could go wrong?

SUBHEAD: Just the snowballing incompetence, venality, mendacity, and impotence of the US government.

By James Kunstler on 14 April 2017 for Kunstler.com -
(http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/7396/)


Image above: A mock-up of a BU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) nicknamed the Mother of All Bombs at US Air Force Armament Museum. From (http://www.armchairgeneral.com/mother-of-all-bombs.htm).

“Things fall apart; the center cannot hold.” Yeats wrote.

The funny thing is, we didn’t seem to miss the center all that much after it was gone. America is perfectly satisfied hunkering down at the margins these days. Especially the margins of thinking.

One thing that used to occupy the center was public discussion, debate, and argumentation. Now and again, it featured a coherent exchange of ideas. These days, the main political factions are sunk in hysteria of one kind or another. Their primitive promptings hardly add up to ideas but rather limbic spasms of fear and rage.

And then there is the shadow partner of the two parties called the Deep State, led by the quaintly dubbed “Intelligence Community.”

These birds, many of them lifers, are dedicated to making the public discussion of anything as incoherent as possible so as to prevent any change in policy that might curtail the growth of the Deep State, a sort of cancer of the body politic.

Case in point, the recent Syrian aerial gas attack in the town of Khan Sheikhoun.

Elected officials were all over the cable networks selling the NSA’s story that Syrian president Bashar Assad bombed women and children with Sarin gas three days after State Department declared that it had a new policy of letting Assad remain in power after decades of sedulously scheming to shove him out. That might have led to the end of the six-year-long Syrian civil war, which Assad seemed to be winning, finally — with Russian assistance.

But instead the incident has led to new official calls to shove Assad out… to be replaced by what…? Nobody knows. Because the US Deep State thrives when chaos reigns in foreign lands. So much the better for their looting operations, such as the theft of Libya’s 141 ton gold reserves in 2011.

And if not looting hard assets directly, the Deep State benefits when its many black box vendors — the private security armies, materials suppliers, arms sellers — are raking in the accounts receivable.

The fascinating part of the Syrian gas bombing story is how easily the public swallowed it. Those elected congressmen and senators infesting the cable stations told the public that the Intelligence Community “issued a consensus report” that the Syrian air force has dropped Sarin gas bombs on the hapless civilians. Nobody offered any actual evidence that this was so. These days, mere assertions rule.

That’s how we roll now. I’m still waiting to see some evidence that Trump’s campaign “colluded with Russia” to spin the election toward him. Those claims, too, were put out as “a consensus analysis” by the Intelligence Community.

And then in March, months after the disputed election, just-retired NSA director James Clapper told NBC’s Meet the Press that his agency had no evidence of “Russian collusion” with the Trump forces.

That was only a few weeks ago.

For the moment, it may benefit casual observers to adopt the most cynical attitude possible about the “consensus reports” that emanate from these myriad agencies.

What it all finally seems to represent is the snowballing incompetence, venality, mendacity, and impotence of the US government in general, in all its layers and branches.

Hence, the idiotic PR stunt the other day of dropping the so-called “Mother of All Bombs (MOAB)” on some backwater of the once-and-future Mother of All Backwaters, Afghanistan. Did you happen to see a photo of that Mother Bomb?

It looked bigger than any airplane that might be assigned to carry it, a cartoon of a bomb, more ridiculous than anything you might see in a Vin Diesel movie.

It even had the acronym “MOAB” plastered on its fuselage in case anyone might confuse it with a canister of Round-up.

I wonder what it cost. Got to be more than the $1 million-plus for a Tomahawk missile. You could probably run the whole Medicaid system of Alabama on what one MOAB invoice comes in at.

Meanwhile, the Navy’s Aircraft Carrier Strike Force 1 steams off the waters of North Korea and we lately have word that the US might just try to preemptively take out Kim Jong-un’s nuclear bomb assembly site. There’s a tang of excitement in the air (and on the cable channels).

America’s back in the game, proving that when all else fails we can be depended on at least to blow some shit up. What could wrong?

.

War Whore Graham

SUBHEAD: A bewildered Fox News host takes on delusional Sen. Lindsey Graham over Syrian air strikes.

By Hawk Media on 8 April 2017 for Zero Hedge -
(http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-08/bewildered-tucker-carlson-takes-delusional-senator-graham-over-syrian-strikes)


Image above: Mashup of Sen Lindsey Graham applying lipstick on a whore. From (https://56packardman.com/2015/12/16/jerry-manders-political-corner-the-many-faces-of-lindsey-graham/).

I want you to watch this video, so that you know what you're up against. We aren't dealing with rational people. Here is the Senator from South Carolina, a man with great power in this country, telling Tucker Carlson with a straight face that taking out Saddam was a good idea. Additionally, he said taking out Libya was a good idea. Now he wants to take out Assad, because 'he's killing his own people.'

It's called a civil war, actually, and he wasn't killing anyone until American sponsored ISIS invaded his country.

For about a year, I've been blogging a lot of politics, hoping that Trump's message of 'America first' was genuine. I see now, much to my dismay, that's not the case.

While some of you don't take issue with the Syrian attack, I view it as the rubicon that Trump crossed to be part of the club, one with John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Nancy Pelosi.

This isn't about supporting Assad, but about setting priorities and properly analyzing risk. In many respects, this is much akin to trading. We place bets and hope that they work out. But any good trader knows that the monetary loss isn't the most important factor in a bad trade, but the time lost in hoping for a return.

How does destroying Assad help you? How does spending $84m on 59 cruise missiles help towards that elusive infrastructure bill?
It doesn't.

There will be plenty of true Trumpers out here to fulfill your need for partisan propaganda. I can no longer provide such a service, as I've decided that I don't trust the man anymore.
Anyone who placates filth like the man featured in the video below is undeserving of my valuable time.

Please listen to his words, interpret his rationale, analyze his cadence and body language -- and juxtapose that against Tucker's -- and tell me Graham isn't a dangerous person.


Video above: S.C. Senator Lindsey Graham on Tucker Carlson's Fox NEws show said, "We need more troops in Syria like we have in Iraq" From (https://youtu.be/6q44qea3zmc).

And here's the other side to the story.


Video above: Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard on Tucker Carlson's Foc NEws show said, "Syria missile strike is illegal and unconstitutional" From (https://youtu.be/wsQbvpMmBZs).

On April 8th Tulsi emailed her supporters this message:

"What President Trump did was illegal. Not only did he lack the Congressional authorization to launch a military strike against Syria -- by launching missiles before the United Nations could collect evidence from the site of this week's chemical attacks in Syria, the White House has jeopardized the legitimacy of future attacks on chemical assets or the regime airbases used to deliver them."
.

Save Pagan Island from US Navy


SOURCE: Ken Taylor (littlewheel808@gmail.com)
SUBHEAD: Pagan residents made it through Spanish colonization, Japanese occupation, World War II and a volcanic eruption. Now many just want to go home again.

By Dan Lin and others on 13 December 2016 for Civil Beat -
(http://www.civilbeat.org/2016/12/the-fight-to-save-pagan-island-from-us-bombs/)


Image above: View of the coconut forest leading out to the tip of Pagan.Photo by Michael Lusk in 2010. From (https://www.flickr.com/photos/killkudzu/5216434637)

SAIPAN, Northern Mariana Islands — For Sowmangeyong Daniel Kaipat, the question wasn’t whether to enlist in the military after high school. It was what branch of the service to join.

“If you think you’re man enough to earn the title of Marine, then come with us,” Kaipat remembers a Marine Corps recruiter telling him. “But if you want money… then I can’t promise you that.”
He joined the Marines and served in Iraq, Okinawa and Korea. He was honorably discharged after five years.

That’s when the 23-year-old moved to Pagan (pronounced PAW-gahn), an island in the Northern Mariana Islands where his father and his grandfather used to live.

Kaipat grew up in Saipan, the capital of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The U.S. territory, north of Guam, is home to about 53,000 people.

During summers in high school, he took a boat up to Pagan with his father where they fished and lived off the land.

Kaipat’s father and extended family used to live on Pagan permanently, but were forced to leave in 1981 after a volcanic eruption engulfed their village.

Like other former Pagan residents and their relatives, Kaipat and his father visit the island for months at a time, depending on the availability of transportation and supplies. The longest that Kaipat lived there continuously was for a year and a half after he got out of the Marine Corps.

There’s no infrastructure on Pagan, which is less than 20 square miles. Despite its isolation, Kaipat loved it. He would hunt coconut crabs and catch reef fish. He felt closer to his Carolinian and Palauan heritage.

“It was healthier,” he says. “There were no temptations like junk food.”

When he decided to go to college, he had to move back to Saipan to enroll. The 28-year-old still wants to return to Pagan eventually.

But that might not be possible now that the Navy wants to use the northern part of Pagan for bombing practice and other war games.

If the plan gets approved, the beaches where Kaipat and others used to fish and swim will be dredged, and access to the island could be limited during the four months of annual training.

The Navy’s proposal is part of a broader plan to ramp up military training in Guam and the commonwealth, the closest U.S. territories to Asia. Department of Defense officials say it’s necessary to turn Pagan into a training ground to ensure that about 5,000 Marines who are moving to Guam from Okinawa are ready for war.

Although the Department of Defense doesn’t own any property on the island, Congress could take it through eminent domain. The residents of the commonwealth, who don’t have a vote in Congress, wouldn’t have a say.

That worries former residents like Kaipat who fear any war games will destroy Pagan and make it impossible for anyone to move back.

Even though it’s been decades since the volcanic eruption, many still consider Pagan to be home. The commonwealth government still recognizes Pagan and neighboring undeveloped islands as a separate political district, and their mayor, Jerome Aldan, is adamantly opposed to the plans.

The commonwealth’s governor, Ralph Torres, is also resisting the idea. His administration is even moving forward with a long-awaited homesteading program on Pagan.

Even the federal Environmental Protection Agency is criticizing the Navy for the potential destruction of rare coral species that are already under stress from climate change.

“I don’t think it’s right for the military to do that,” Kaipat’s father Diego says of the plans. “We can’t live there if they’re doing that.”

The Department of Defense is already bombing the nearby island of Farallon de Medinilla, and has been doing so since 1971. But that island doesn’t have beaches conducive to amphibious landing practice, and Pagan does.

The same qualities that make the island good for military training also make it a desirable place to live.

“It would be a shame for us to lose that,” Diego says.

Why Pagan Is Special To Some

Diego was born on the island of Agrihan, just north of Pagan, and moved to Pagan as a kid.
His family lived in a two-room house where he and his siblings would sleep in one bedroom with their parents.

“My dad would take us out to go and catch fish for our food,” he recalls.

They also raised pigs, chickens and goats. They didn’t have a car, so cows were used to haul copra from one place to another.

Copra is dried coconut meat that can be used to make oil. Back then, in the 1950s, ships would come from Japan to buy copra every month, Diego remembers.

Pagan, like the rest of the Mariana Islands, was traditionally home to indigenous Chamorro people. Historic artifacts found on the island date back hundreds of years.

After Magellan landed on Guam, the entire island chain came under Spanish rule. During the 17th century, Spanish colonizers forcefully relocated Pagan residents in an effort to concentrate Chamorros and indoctrinate them in Catholicism.

Soon hundreds of residents moved back to Pagan illegally and the Spanish government forcefully removed them again. There’s not a lot of historical data on the island’s population but it appears that residents eventually moved back near the end of 19th century.

Spain sold the Northern Mariana Islands to Germany in 1899, which lost them to Japan in 1914. That’s when Pagan became home to hundreds of Japanese and Okinawan people, along with Chamorro and Carolinian people, who had moved to the Marianas from the Caroline Islands.

As World War II loomed, more than 2,000 Japanese service members were based on the island. They built a runway, troop barracks and bunkers to store bombs and fuel.

Americans bombed Pagan, and after winning over the Northern Marianas, the U.S. military removed hundreds of Pagan residents to Saipan for medical attention.


Image above: Earthjustice attorney David Henkin, who is suing the Navy, walks by a cannon on Pagan left over from World War II. Gus Castro stands in the background. Castro is one of the former residents of Pagan who wants to live there permanently. Photo by Dan Lin. From original article.

After the war some indigenous people still wanted to go back, and dozens finally did in 1951. That’s around the time Diego’s family moved there, too.

He remembers how ships would come regularly and villagers would buy rice, soy sauce, coffee and other supplies. Sometimes tourists would visit on cruise ships and enjoy the hot springs. It was a good life, Diego recalls.

But that all changed one day in 1981.

Forced To Flee

Pedro Castro was sitting at a picnic table planning a religious festival when his coffee cup started to shake. The ground was rolling as he stood up and tried to run toward the radio communications.

It was May 15, 1981, and Pagan’s northern volcano was beginning to erupt. Castro, who worked for the National Weather Service tried to call Saipan, but no one answered. It was Friday, and payday, he remembers.

He tried a different island — Rota, a smaller island south of Saipan — and finally got a reply. Castro told the man who answered that the volcano was erupting.

And then he started to run. The air tasted like sulfur.

Diego Kaipat’s sister-in-law, Jacinta Kaipat, was 21. She had only been living on Pagan for a few months, and was working as a health assistant and taking care of her two young children.

She remembers running, carrying her son in her arms as the ground shook beneath her. She looked back and saw a mass of fire and ash. She suddenly couldn’t move, despite her husband screaming at her to run.

As she stood rooted to the spot, her brother-in-law ran over and took the baby out of her hands.
Her husband shouted at her, pleading: What would her children do without their mother? Finally, her legs started working again.

But there was nowhere to run. The only way to escape was to go into the ocean.

Jacinta swam along with dozens of others. Near her, an 11-year-old child held an 8-month-old, swimming with the baby above the water. Her father-in-law carried a child who had been knocked out by a falling rock.

Black rocks kept raining above them until they made it to Castro’s boat. It had a hole in the bottom but they still leapt into it. She took off her slippers and paddled furiously.

Miraculously the boat made it the south side of the island. Jacinta scrambled onto the rock and coral. They cut her feet, but she couldn’t feel it. She was so numb from shock. The sky was black with ash and falling rocks.

Castro told the group to move inland because he was afraid there would be a tsunami. They didn’t have food but found coconuts to eat. Some made a fire to try to attract a boat.

Castro remembers listening to a transistor radio and a news report that speculated that there were no survivors as he and others waited for a boat to pick them up.

No one died or was seriously hurt. In the morning, a Japanese cargo ship rescued them.

The Associated Press later reported that 53 residents were displaced by the volcanic eruption, which shot ash as high as 40,000 feet.

Starting a New Life

The commonwealth government told residents not to return to Pagan due to the risk of another eruption.

Jacinta Kaipat moved in with her family who lived in Saipan and got a job as a nurse at the local hospital.

But for Pagan residents like Clotilde Kaipat Aldan who hadn’t grown up on Saipan, the move was harder.

Her husband went back to Pagan to get their things but came back empty-handed.

“Everything was buried,” says Aldan, including her fridge, freezer, gas stove, washing machine, clothes, bed, chairs and table.

The ash even covered the windows and doors of her home. The volcano had engulfed the village on the northern side of the island.

She and her husband wanted to farm and fish on Saipan but it was unfamiliar. Unlike on Pagan, they didn’t know the best places to find food.

Eventually, the government gave them and other Pagan refugees long-term leases on concrete houses near the Saipan hospital. The neighborhood was nicknamed “Paganville.”

Clotilde Aldan got a job preparing food in the hospital cafeteria. Life moved on.

Repopulating Pagan 
Jerome Aldan’s office is a single-story white concrete building in a village known as Capitol Hill in Saipan. Maps of Pagan, Alamagan and Agrihan are plastered on the walls.

Jerome is one of Clotilde’s sons, and lived on Pagan until he was 8 years old and the volcano erupted.

He’s now the mayor of Pagan and other sparsely inhabited islands in the Marianas, collectively called “the northern islands.”

In 2014, he was elected with a total of 155 votes. He beat his opponent by just 33 votes.

His job is unusual given how tiny his constituency is, and many of them don’t live full-time in the northern islands.

Jerome Aldan doesn’t even live in his district most of the time. But it probably wouldn’t make sense anyway because Saipan is the center of the commonwealth government.

And he sees part of his job as convincing local government leaders to invest in Pagan and neighboring undeveloped islands, a job that would be hard to do by satellite phone.

It’s already a herculean task. The commonwealth already struggles to provide consistent electricity and potable water on the islands of Saipan, Tinian and Rota.

The islands’ economy has long been volatile. By the late 1990s, the commonwealth’s Japanese tourism economy was dwindling. By 2012, its multi-million dollar garment industry had folded.

Recently the government’s retirement fund tried to declare bankruptcy. In 2013, the islands’ long-term debt exceeded $350 million. Last year, more than half of the population lived below the poverty line.

Pedro Castro has seen many politicians come and go over the decades since he’s left Pagan, and no longer believes that any of them — even Jerome Aldan — will help former Pagan residents like himself actually resettle the island.

“We’ve waited a long, long time and nobody not even the government (has helped),” he says. “We were administered by the Trust Territory (of the United Nations) at one time, but nothing is done to build a hospital there, build a good school.”

While others might scoff that it’s a pipe dream, Jerome Aldan is still enthusiastic and optimistic about the prospect of building a community on Pagan again. He’s encouraged by the governor’s recent support for homesteading.

In 2012, before that was announced, Aldan held a conference to explore the potential for the island to serve as a hub for ecotourism, aquaculture, agriculture, scientific research or even geothermal energy production.

Others have their own ideas for the future of the island. For many years, Castro encouraged the government to open up the island to mining of volcanic ash known as pozzolan that could be sold to foreign investors to make cement and concrete.

Japanese companies sought in 2012 to use the island as a dumping ground for millions of tons of debris left over from the massive 2011 tsunami. They were egged on by a local representative who argued that dumping tsunami debris on Pagan could incentivize mining operations. But the idea was successfully opposed by environmentalists.

Meanwhile, former Pagan residents like Diego Kaipat haven’t been waiting on the government to resettle the island.

They started traveling up there on their own in the early 2000s and staying for months at a time.

But the lack of reliable transportation and frequent storms make it hard to stay permanently, Kaipat says. Before the volcano, ships would come often enough that you could get whatever supplies you needed or catch a ride to go to the hospital if you needed to.

Nowadays, there aren’t regular flights or boat rides. Even Aldan’s office has a tough time securing funding to visit the island, sometimes postponing visits for months.

Could Military Plans Actually Help? 

Castro may be frustrated with decades of government inaction on Pagan, but thinks that the Navy’s plans to train may actually be helpful because the agency has the resources to help with redevelopment.

“If the military can negotiate with the government and strictly use the land they designated for training, I think the people who wanted to move back can still have the opportunity,” he says.

Castro is not worried that debris from unexploded ordnance would prevent people from living there. Like other islands in the Marianas, Pagan is still littered with bombs and fragments of munitions from World War II.

To Castro, that’s not a big deal. He thinks training and development can coexist.

But the Navy’s plans make no reference to developing the island for habitation. The bombing range and training areas also overlap with parts of the island used for fishing and farming.

Still, Vicente Aldan, who is the mayor’s uncle, is similarly hopeful that a deal could be worked out.

He grew up on Pagan where he worked as a schoolteacher for many years until the volcanic eruption. At age 64, he continues to farm on the south side of Saipan, growing dragon fruit, bananas, pineapples and tapioca, because it reminds him of Pagan.

He thinks politicians should be strategic and see if the Navy could help fund infrastructure on the island, rather than rejecting the plans outright.

Otherwise, he doubts that the commonwealth government will ever have enough money to fund a permanent settlement, even if the military training never happens.

Neither Castro nor Vicente Aldan plan to move back to Pagan. Castro says he’s too old; Aldan says he’s worried about another eruption.

Craig Welden, executive director of U.S. Marine Corps Forces Pacific, says he doesn’t think that the training would prevent people from living on island, and wants to find ways to “bridge gaps” between the Department of Defense’s needs and locals who want to go back.

“We are very open to trying to find solutions which can achieve homesteading opportunities for people who want to live in Pagan,” Welden says.

While bombs would be dropped on Pagan’s northern volcano, “We would take extensive efforts to ensure that the rest of the island is kept in a pristine manner,” he says.

He emphasizes that the training is important because about 5,000 Marines who are moving to nearby Guam need a place to train. Pagan’s proximity to Guam would cut down on costs of flying to other countries for training, he says.

The move is also part of a broader strategic push to beef up the military’s presence in the Asia-Pacific region. Within the Marianas, Pagan would allow a more intense level of training that doesn’t currently exist on Guam or Tinian, permitting a “full spectrum of munitions” where multiple branches of the service could practice joint exercises.

Welden says a new environmental analysis scheduled to be published next spring will take into account the concerns that have been raised and propose two new training alternatives. A final decision is expected in the summer of 2018.


Image above: Map of Pagan Island show where the Navy wants to "train" on. Blue boxes in north are specific "Target Areas"; The dotted area in the north is the "High Hazard Impact Area"; the diagonal dotted line area surrounding it is "Dedicated Maneuver Area"; and the brown area rimmed in red in the south is the "Non-Live Fire Maneuver Area". Map provided by the US Navy. From original article.

Despite the Department of Defense’s efforts to revise its studies, local community organizations and environmental groups have filed a lawsuit to stop the training.

The complaint brought by Earthjustice and the Center for Biological Diversity targets the Pagan bombing range as well as multiple live-fire ranges on Tinian.

Brian Turner, an attorney with the National Trust for Historic Preservation in San Francisco, isn’t part of the case, but is worried about the lack of comprehensive surveys of Pagan’s historic sites.

A Navy survey found 180 historic sites on Pagan, including Chamorro latte stones dating back hundreds of years. Nearly two-thirds of those sites are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, Turner says.

But the Navy only conducted on-the-ground surveys for 600 acres out of 11,680 acres on the island and relied on aerial surveys for the rest, Turner says.

Meanwhile, the EPA says the training on Pagan would destroy 121 acres of marine habitat across six beaches, including 10,600 colonies of threatened coral at South Beach.

The federal agency wants the Navy to change its plan to avoid that beach to spare the threatened coral, already under pressure from climate change.

Threatened coral is also found at Green Beach, but data on coral species found at Gold and North beaches is missing, the EPA says in its official comments.


Image above: There’s lots of coral on Pagan beaches that would be harmed by military training. But the EPA says data isn’t available about coral at Gold Beach, pictured above. Photo by Dan Lin. From original article.

Sowmangeyong Daniel Kaipat drove amphibious vehicles when he was stationed at Kaneohe Bay. He shakes his head thinking about how the Navy would have to break the coral reefs to make the beaches compatible with amphibious landings.

“Just like Hawaii, we’re a chain of islands, like one big ohana,” Kaipat says. “We’re a little people … We don’t have much to give.”

Despite his opposition to the military’s plans, Kaipat is still thinking of re-enlisting in the Marine Corps after he graduates from college.

If he does, he says he would drop bombs on Pagan if ordered to do so. But it’s a decision he hopes he doesn’t have to make.

A Disappearing Dream

While Kaipat plans to return to Pagan, for some former residents, the decades since the volcanic eruption have forced that dream to fade.

Now in her late 50s, Jacinta Kaipat is in a wheelchair, and when she talks about returning to Pagan, it’s in a wistful, nostalgic tone.

She knows that it’s unlikely she’ll make it back. But she still dreams of bringing her children. She wants them to see where their father grew up.

Jacinta Kaipat’s late husband, who also lived on Pagan, was a Gulf War veteran. One of her children is also a veteran who was medically discharged after she injured her back during a Humvee accident.


Image above: Pagan resident Jacinta Kaipat wishes she could bring her kids and grandkids to Pagan. Photo by Cory Lum. From original article.

So Jacinta says she recognizes the importance of military readiness and doesn’t question the need for training.

But she can’t wrap her head around why Pagan, of all islands, is the one that the Navy wants to bomb.
“That island is beautiful,” she says. “It would be nice for our kids to go back.”

Clotilde Aldan feels the same. On a recent afternoon, she sits on a picnic table outside her house on Saipan, the same yellow home that the government gave her family after the volcanic eruption.
She reminisces about Pagan: how she would go swimming with her brothers in the clear ocean, or hunting with her father to catch coconut crabs, pigs or goats.

“Unless you’re lazy, the food is there,” she says. “Everything is here.”

Even though she wants to go back, she’s not sure if she could given her health problems.

Her recollections are cut short when her daughter reminds her that they need to go to the Department of Public Lands to pay a fee for the new homestead program.

“Two hundred dollars,” Clotilde says, shaking her head.

Still, she gets up to leave. One of her grandsons — Jerome, the mayor of Pagan’s, son — recently returned from the war in Iraq, she explains.

She wants to make sure he has an island to go home to.

See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: Help save Mariana Islands 11/17/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Pagan Island beauty threatened 9/16/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Navy to conquer Marianas again 9/3/13

See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: Oceans4Peace Pacific Pivot Panel 6/18/16
Ea O Ka Aina: Ocean 4 Peace Events 6/11/16
Ea O Ka Aina: Prepare for RIMPAC 2016 War in Hawaii 5/22/16
Ea O Ka Aina: Navy to "take" millions of mammals 5/17/16
Ea O Ka Aina: US court RIMPAC Impact decision 4/3/15
Ea O Ka Aina: RIMPAC 2014 Impact Postmortem 10/22/1
Ea O Ka Aina: RIMPAC 2014 in Full March 7/16/14
Ea O Ka Aina: 21st Century Energy Wars 7/10/14
Ea O Ka Aina: RIMPAC War on the Ocean 7/3/14
Ea O Ka Aina: Voila - World War Three 7/1/14
Ea O Ka Aina: The Pacific Pivot 6/28/14
Ea O Ka Aina: RIMPAC IMPACT 6/8/14
Ea O Ka Aina: RIMPAC Then and Now 5/16/14
Ea O Ka Aina: Earthday TPP Fukushima RIMPAC 4/22/14
Ea O Ka Aina: The Asian Pivot - An ugly dance 12/5/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Help save Mariana Islands 11/13/13
Ea O Ka Aina: End RimPac destruction of Pacific 11/1/13 
Ea O Ka Aina: Moana Nui Confereence 11/1/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Navy to conquer Marianas again  9/3/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Pagan Island beauty threatened 10/26/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Navy license to kill 10/27/12 
Ea O Ka Aina: Sleepwalking through destruction 7/16/12
Ea O Ka Aina: Okinawa breathes easier 4/27/12
Ea O Ka Aina: Navy Next-War-Itis 4/13/12
Ea O Ka Aina: America bullies Koreans 4/13/12
Ea O Ka Aina: Despoiling Jeju island coast begins 3/7/12
Ea O Ka Aina: Jeju Islanders protests Navy Base 2/29/12
Ea O Ka Aina: Hawaii - Start of American Empire 2/26/12
Ea O Ka Aina: Korean Island of Peace 2/26/12   
Ea O Ka Aina: Military schmoozes Guam & Hawaii 3/17/11
Ea O Ka Aina: In Search of Real Security - One 8/31/10
Ea O Ka Aina: Peace for the Blue Continent 8/10/10
Ea O Ka Aina: Shift in Pacific Power Balance 8/5/10
Ea O Ka Aina: RimPac to expand activities 6/29/10
Ea O Ka Aina: RIMPAC War Games here in July 6/20/10
Ea O Ka Aina: Pacific Resistance to U.S. Military 5/24/10
Ea O Ka Aina: De-colonizing the Pacific 5/21/10
Ea O Ka Aina: RIMPAC to Return in 2010 5/2/10
Ea O Ka Aina: Living at the Tip of the Spear 4/5/10
Ea O Ka Aina: Living at the Tip of the Spear 4/15/10
Ea O Ka Aina: Guam Land Grab 11/30/09
Ea O Ka Aina: Guam as a modern Bikini Atoll 12/25/09
Ea O Ka Aina: GUAM - Another Strategic Island 11/8/09
Ea O Ka Aina: Diego Garcia - Another stolen island 11/6/09
Ea O Ka Aina: DARPA & Super-Cavitation on Kauai 3/24/09
Island Breath: RIMPAC 2008 - Navy fired up in Hawaii 7/2/08
Island Breath: RIMPAC 2008 uses destructive sonar 4/22/08
Island Breath: Navy Plans for the Pacific 9/3/07
Island Breath: Judge restricts sonar off California 08/07/07
Island Breath: RIMPAC 2006 sonar compromise 7/9/06
Island Breath: RIMPAC 2006 - Impact on Ocean 5/23/06
Island Breath: RIMPAC 2004 - Whale strandings on Kauai 9/2/04
Island Breath: PMRF Land Grab 3/15/04  


.

Russia warns shooting down US jets

SUBHEAD: White House spokesman confirms plan for U.S. air strikes on Syria has been rejected.

By Jmie McIntyre on 6 October 2016 for Washington Examiner -
(http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/russia-warns-of-possible-shoot-down-of-us-planes-over-syria/article/2603838#!)


Image above: White House spokesman Josh Earnest confirmed this plan change to reporters on Thursday 6th October 2016. From (http://theduran.com/us-backs-down-over-syria-following-russian-threat-shoot-down-american-aircraft/).

Just days after Russia moved an additional advanced anti-aircraft battery to Syria, Moscow hinted toward a possible shoot-down of U.S. or coalition planes that threaten or attack Syrian government troops, which are backed by Moscow.

The U.S. and Russia have a memorandum of understanding designed to avert any confrontation between their warplanes in the skies over Syria, but Moscow says that doesn't apply to its ground-based missile crews.

"Any missile or airstrikes on the territory controlled by the Syrian government will create a clear threat to Russian servicemen," Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Gen. Igor Konashenkov said Thursday, according to Kremlin-backed Russia Today."

"Russian air defense system crews are unlikely to have time to determine in a 'straight line' the exact flight paths of missiles and then who the warheads belong to."

At the Pentagon, a reporter asked spokesman Peter Cook whether the statement represented a threat to U.S. aircraft.

"Well, again, I'll leave it to the Russians to describe what the purpose of that system, those systems are for. And I will highlight once again that their stated intent in going into Syria was to target groups like al Nusra and ISIL, and those groups do not operate aircraft," he said.

"And so we would continue to have concerns about what purpose they're serving in those locations.

And more importantly, we'll continue to conduct our operations as we have for months now over Syria, and we'll continue to do so taking every possible step we need to to ensure the safety of our air crews, coalition air crews in Syria."

He also said that despite differences with the Russians over Syria, the MOU with Moscow has been successful in reducing the risk to U.S. pilots.

"It has been an effective means of communication to avoid misunderstanding and miscalculation," Cook said. "We will continue to employ that line of communication in an appropriate fashion, and would encourage the Russians to do the same."

Konashenkov seemed also to be boasting that U.S. stealth technology would offer little protection against Russia's advanced S-300 and S-400 missile systems, both of which it has deployed in Syria.


Video above: White House spokesman Josh Earnest speaking to reporters on Thursday 6th October 2016. From (https://youtu.be/LIR4UP4rYkY).


.

25 Years of Bombing Iraq

SOURCE: Katerine MuzikPHD (kmuzik@gmail.com)
SUBHEAD: Pentagon holds black-tie gala to celebrate silver anniversary of continuous bombing of the ancient Middle Eastern nation.

By Staff on 21 January 2016 for the Onion -
(http://www.theonion.com/article/pentagon-holds-gala-celebrate-25-years-bombing-ira-52213)


Image above: Attendees at the Iraq Bombing Silver Anniversary Event discuss their favorite Iraqi villages to destroyed. From original article.

WASHINGTON DC—Bringing together the many civilian leaders and military strategists who helped them reach such a historic milestone, Pentagon officials held a lavish black-tie gala Sunday at which, sources said, they commemorated 25 years of the United States bombing Iraq.

Hundreds of active-duty and retired military officers, high-ranking members of the past four presidential administrations, and executives from top defense contractors reportedly gathered in the grand ballroom of D.C.’s Fairmont Hotel to dine, mingle, and celebrate a quarter century spent routinely dropping thousands of tons of explosive ordnance across the Middle Eastern nation—from the Jan. 17, 1991 onset of airstrikes in the Gulf War to the current bombardment of suspected ISIS targets.

“I’ll never forget that morning 25 years ago when our first strike force of stealth bombers flew in and just unloaded on Baghdad,” said the evening’s keynote speaker, Dick Cheney, who served as defense secretary during the Gulf War, vice president during the Iraq War, and, in the intervening years, CEO of the oil field services company Halliburton. “And then we started letting them have it with our Tomahawk cruise missiles, too. If you’d told me back then we’d still be pounding some of those very same targets today, I wouldn’t have believed you.”

“But hundreds of thousands of bombs later, here we are!” Cheney added to thunderous applause. “And it’s all thanks to the dedication and resolve of the people in this room.”

Leading the gala’s impressive guest list were Presidents George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama, who according to reports spent much of the evening exchanging stories—some old, some new—of their respective experiences demolishing Fallujah, Mosul, Anbar Province, the Sunni Triangle, and countless other locations. The former commanders-in-chief reportedly shared the head table with a delegation from the neoconservative think tank Project for the New American Century and members of the Saudi royal family, whom Cheney praised as “staunch allies through this whole thing.”

Also present were Iraq War architects Condoleezza Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, and Richard Perle, who admitted to reporters they felt overwhelmed by nostalgia throughout the event as they reconnected with old faces and shared laughs over the discredited intelligence that served as the basis for military action. Reportedly seated nearby were journalists Judith Miller and Bill Keller, who received a special commendation for their work covering the run-up to the 2003 invasion for The New York Times, drawing one of the largest standing ovations of the night.

Representatives from Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrup Grumman, and other weapons manufacturers were honored as well, and thanked for donating the gala’s elaborate ice sculptures that depicted a vintage Raytheon-designed Patriot missile from Operation Desert Storm, a 2003-era cluster bomb now banned by most countries, and a modern MQ-9 Reaper UAV armed with Hellfire missiles and 500-pound munitions.

“This is a truly magnificent night—I just wish Gen. [Norman] Schwarzkopf were here to see it,” said retired Gen. Raymond T. Odierno during a portion of the evening’s ceremonies that paid tribute to all the commanders of U.S. forces in Iraq over the years. “Twenty-five years ago, I was only a major, still in my 30s, and I really looked up to that guy. I never thought I’d get a chance to do what he did, but a couple decades later, there I was, ordering some of the very same bombing runs that he had. I modeled my entire career after his and feel privileged to have followed so closely in his footsteps.”

“It’s especially important that we take a moment tonight to honor our legacy in Iraq so that today’s troops can fully appreciate the rich history of our military campaigns there,” continued Odierno, “as most of them weren’t born yet when we started bombing the place.”

According to attendees, the gala featured an elaborate multimedia presentation titled A Generation Of Commitment, which began with a montage of night-vision targeting footage from Desert Storm interspersed with reports from up-and-coming CNN correspondent Wolf Blitzer. A segment called “The Clinton Years: A Retrospective” showed F-16 fighter jets enforcing no-fly zones, and then rolled highlights from Operation Desert Fox while Outkast’s 2000 recording “B.O.B (Bombs Over Baghdad)” played in the background.

The presentation’s survey of Operation Iraqi Freedom included video of then–Secretary of State Colin Powell assuring the U.N. that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction, a May 2003 clip of a flight suit–clad George W. Bush landing on an aircraft carrier adorned with a “Mission Accomplished” banner, and a July 2003 clip of Bush saying “Bring ’em on” in response to questions about the rapidly growing Iraqi insurgency.

The final segment, “Drones: The Game-Changer,” showed images taken just last week of airmen in a small computer room in Nevada bombing Iraq using joysticks and real-time video feeds.

“Sure, we’ve been through some hard times, especially those dark days in 2012 and 2013 when we pretty much stopped bombing Iraq entirely,” former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said in his closing remarks to the group, raising a glass of champagne as the room followed suit. “But we started right up again, like we always do, and we’ve seen thousands of new airstrikes since. Our enemy may change, but from Saddam to the Islamic State—and through all the I-don’t-know-how-many insurgencies in between—our mission has remained the same. We’ve stayed true to our roots and kept the tradition of bombing Iraq alive.”

Added Rumsfeld, “Here’s to 25 more years!”


.