SUBHEAD: A bewildered Fox News host takes on delusional Sen. Lindsey Graham over Syrian air strikes.
By Hawk Media on 8 April 2017 for Zero Hedge -
(http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-08/bewildered-tucker-carlson-takes-delusional-senator-graham-over-syrian-strikes)
Image above: Mashup of Sen Lindsey Graham applying lipstick on a whore. From (https://56packardman.com/2015/12/16/jerry-manders-political-corner-the-many-faces-of-lindsey-graham/).
I want you to watch this video, so that you know what you're up against. We aren't dealing with rational people. Here is the Senator from South Carolina, a man with great power in this country, telling Tucker Carlson with a straight face that taking out Saddam was a good idea. Additionally, he said taking out Libya was a good idea. Now he wants to take out Assad, because 'he's killing his own people.'
It's called a civil war, actually, and he wasn't killing anyone until American sponsored ISIS invaded his country.
For about a year, I've been blogging a lot of politics, hoping that Trump's message of 'America first' was genuine. I see now, much to my dismay, that's not the case.
While some of you don't take issue with the Syrian attack, I view it as the rubicon that Trump crossed to be part of the club, one with John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Nancy Pelosi.
This isn't about supporting Assad, but about setting priorities and properly analyzing risk. In many respects, this is much akin to trading. We place bets and hope that they work out. But any good trader knows that the monetary loss isn't the most important factor in a bad trade, but the time lost in hoping for a return.
How does destroying Assad help you? How does spending $84m on 59 cruise missiles help towards that elusive infrastructure bill?
It doesn't.
There will be plenty of true Trumpers out here to fulfill your need for partisan propaganda. I can no longer provide such a service, as I've decided that I don't trust the man anymore.
Anyone who placates filth like the man featured in the video below is undeserving of my valuable time.
Please listen to his words, interpret his rationale, analyze his cadence and body language -- and juxtapose that against Tucker's -- and tell me Graham isn't a dangerous person.
Video above: S.C. Senator Lindsey Graham on Tucker Carlson's Fox NEws show said, "We need more troops in Syria like we have in Iraq" From (https://youtu.be/6q44qea3zmc).
And here's the other side to the story.
Video above: Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard on Tucker Carlson's Foc NEws show said, "Syria missile strike is illegal and unconstitutional" From (https://youtu.be/wsQbvpMmBZs).
On April 8th Tulsi emailed her supporters this message:
"What President Trump did was illegal. Not only did he lack the Congressional authorization to launch a military strike against Syria -- by launching missiles before the United Nations could collect evidence from the site of this week's chemical attacks in Syria, the White House has jeopardized the legitimacy of future attacks on chemical assets or the regime airbases used to deliver them."
.
By Hawk Media on 8 April 2017 for Zero Hedge -
(http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-08/bewildered-tucker-carlson-takes-delusional-senator-graham-over-syrian-strikes)
Image above: Mashup of Sen Lindsey Graham applying lipstick on a whore. From (https://56packardman.com/2015/12/16/jerry-manders-political-corner-the-many-faces-of-lindsey-graham/).
I want you to watch this video, so that you know what you're up against. We aren't dealing with rational people. Here is the Senator from South Carolina, a man with great power in this country, telling Tucker Carlson with a straight face that taking out Saddam was a good idea. Additionally, he said taking out Libya was a good idea. Now he wants to take out Assad, because 'he's killing his own people.'
It's called a civil war, actually, and he wasn't killing anyone until American sponsored ISIS invaded his country.
For about a year, I've been blogging a lot of politics, hoping that Trump's message of 'America first' was genuine. I see now, much to my dismay, that's not the case.
While some of you don't take issue with the Syrian attack, I view it as the rubicon that Trump crossed to be part of the club, one with John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Nancy Pelosi.
This isn't about supporting Assad, but about setting priorities and properly analyzing risk. In many respects, this is much akin to trading. We place bets and hope that they work out. But any good trader knows that the monetary loss isn't the most important factor in a bad trade, but the time lost in hoping for a return.
How does destroying Assad help you? How does spending $84m on 59 cruise missiles help towards that elusive infrastructure bill?
It doesn't.
There will be plenty of true Trumpers out here to fulfill your need for partisan propaganda. I can no longer provide such a service, as I've decided that I don't trust the man anymore.
Anyone who placates filth like the man featured in the video below is undeserving of my valuable time.
Please listen to his words, interpret his rationale, analyze his cadence and body language -- and juxtapose that against Tucker's -- and tell me Graham isn't a dangerous person.
Video above: S.C. Senator Lindsey Graham on Tucker Carlson's Fox NEws show said, "We need more troops in Syria like we have in Iraq" From (https://youtu.be/6q44qea3zmc).
And here's the other side to the story.
Video above: Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard on Tucker Carlson's Foc NEws show said, "Syria missile strike is illegal and unconstitutional" From (https://youtu.be/wsQbvpMmBZs).
On April 8th Tulsi emailed her supporters this message:
"What President Trump did was illegal. Not only did he lack the Congressional authorization to launch a military strike against Syria -- by launching missiles before the United Nations could collect evidence from the site of this week's chemical attacks in Syria, the White House has jeopardized the legitimacy of future attacks on chemical assets or the regime airbases used to deliver them."
.
No comments :
Post a Comment