The Truth about Bill 2491

SUBHEAD: Not knowing the facts about GMO's is to Live in Fear! Not standing up for the health of our home, is to Live in Fear!

By Ike Pono Ho'o Pili on 27 July 2013 in Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-truth-about-bill-2491.html)


Image above: Gated front of DuPont's Pioneer agrochemical headquarters in Waimea. Photo by Juan Wilson.

Aloha Kakou,

Not knowing the facts is to Live in Fear! Not standing up for the health of our home, is to Live in Fear! Get informed and do what is right for our island home!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s) about Kaua’i County Bill 2491

What is Bill 2491?

Kaua'i County Bill 2491 protects the people of Kaua’i based on our Right to Know. It allows us to know about highly toxic pesticides, called restricted use pesticides, used by the heaviest users of these
chemicals on our island.

The bill also sets up a buffer zone between where these dangerous pesticides are sprayed and schools, hospitals, residential areas and waterways. In addition, the bill requires that Kaua'i County conduct
an environmental investigation so we can all better understand the impacts of the agrochemical-GMO operations on our island.

In the meantime the bill puts a temporary moratorium on new operations until we have a better understanding of the health, economic, and environmental risks. During that time, the bill also bans open air testing of pesticide and gmo experimenting. Any such activity must instead take place in a completely closed structure.

Does Bill 2491 apply to all farmers?


No. Please tell your friends and families that this bill does NOT affect local farmers. This bill applies only to the five heaviest users of restricted use pesticides.

By focusing on the heaviest users, Bill 2491 enormously increases protection of Kaua'i residents from the dangers of toxic chemical exposure.

Five corporations - Dow AgroScience, Syngenta, DuPont-Pioneer, BASF and Kauai Coffee company use over 98% of the restricted use pesticides (RUP’s) utilized by agricultural operations on Kauai. These companies use approximately18 tons per year of RUP’s (this is the amount of pre-diluted, concentrated form).

The agrochemical / GMO companies often spray many of these RUP's in simultaneously (called “stacking”) in combinations that have are not regulated and have never been tested for their immediate and long term dangers to human health. The children and families of Kauai are
therefore essentially the test community for these combinations of poisons.

Will this bill affect garden nurseries, golf courses, landscapers who use RUPs?

No. Bill 2491 DOES NOT apply to nurseries, golf courses, landscapers and other agricultural users of restricted use pesticides. That is because their use of restricted use pesticides is so small in comparison to the heaviest users of these chemicals – Dow AgroScience, Syngenta, DuPont-Pioneer, BASF, and Kauai Coffee.

Why is Bill 2491 important?

We need the Right to Know about restricted use pesticides to protect the health of our children and families. Doctors need to know when, where and what is being sprayed so that they can treat their patients more effectively. Farmers need to know to protect their crops from drift.

Workers need to know more about the chemicals they handle. Everyone on our island has the Right to Know what chemicals they are being subjected to.

There are no laws yet that give the people of Kauai the right to know which RUPs are being used, where and in what amounts. No studies have been conducted on the cumulative impacts on Kauai. We lack the necessary information to even begin to investigate the health impacts of 18 tons of restricted use pesticides in our neighborhoods.

A Right to Know allows us to begin to protect ourselves.

Who supports this bill?

Bill 2491 has tremendous voter support, as indicated by the greatest number of testimonies in strong support of this bill by Kauai residents in the history of the County Council.

  • Moms and Dads and and those with ohana and friends living within thewind and cloud drift of GMO fields support this bill because it helps them to protect their children’s and their own health.
  • Health Care Professionals support this bill because it will help them deliver more effective patient care.
  • Teachers support this bill because they have witnessed their students falling ill immediately after chemical application activities of these agrochemical / GMO companies.
  • Farmers who grow produce for human consumption (ie, food and other health-friendly crops) support this bill because their crops and land are protected from the unknown consequences of pesticide drift and experimental GMOs.
  • Fishermen, surfers and ocean users support this bill because the Right to Know helps them to protect their waters and fragile ecosystems.
  • Even visitors and tourists support this bill because they care about this island and its people.
We should all support this bill. If you have the honor to call Kauai your home, it is YOUR kuleana to protect life and health of our future generations, our land, and our water.

Is this bill good for Kauai's economy?

Yes. Our island’s reputation as a pure, untouched Garden Island is our greatest asset. Our treasure and greatest job generator is at risk.

Kauai hosted over 1 million visitors in 2011 (7 million visitors statewide), and this number increases each year. Total visitor spending statewide reached $12.581 billion in 2011. Tourism contributed $1.06 billion to total state tax revenue in 2010. Our visitor industry is the biggest generator of jobs, over 145,000 statewide in 2010 – more than 17.4% of total employment.

As our island and Hawaii becomes known as a ground zero for seed corn experiments and the massive pesticide use associated with test activities, our key economic industry and generator of jobs is at risk.

Our visitors want to come to a place where the aina is healthy and the spirit of aloha, of caring for one another, is truly strong. They do not want to come to a pesticide island that is making people sick.

To elevate people’s lives, we need safe, well paying jobs where our people can advance. We need farming and agriculture that uses sustainable practices that are not chemical dependent. In this way, we build an economy that creates profits from life giving, aloha-based values.

Do the agrochemical GMO companies provide many jobs on our island?

Even by the industry’s own high estimates, they provide only 2% of jobs on Kauai. Many of the jobs are part time, contract work that makes use of seasonal low wage workers that come for a few months from the mainland. Some of the workers are hired as "human scarecrows" to manually chase birds and wildlife away from the agrochemical fields.

These are not high quality jobs, and our less skilled ohana deserve better alternatives and life opportunities. Most of the highest paying and well-paying jobs go to those who come from the mainland.

The GMO companies have not been willing to provide a breakdown of their employment figures based on pay scale and job terms. They consider their numbers proprietary and not for the public to see.

Will all the workers really lose those jobs if this bill passes?

Not likely, but that depends on the companies themselves -- How much monetary profit do they want, and how many workers' lives are they willing to sacrifice to make that profit? The cost of doing business on Kauai includes the cost of being accountable and transparent to our island's people.

The agrochemical companies will incur little disclosure cost under Bill 2491. The companies already keep internal records on pesticide application activity. Bill 2491 requires that they make this information readily accessible to the public. There is no reason from a financial standpoint for the agrochemical companies to tell all of their employees that they will be fired if Bill 2491 is passed. If
workers lose their jobs it is because the agrichemical companies considered that profits at any cost were more important.

Supporters of the bill care very much about the workers and their families. This bill will help to protect worker’s health, as with all families on Kaua’i. There are currently several projects that are
trying to find ways to give farm workers and current agrichemical employees safer, more sustainable alternatives to agrichemical field work on our land.

Do workers really oppose the bill, or are many told to do so by their employers?

Testifiers who work for the agrochemical companies have been told by their employers that they would lose their jobs if Bill 2491 passed.

Creating worker fear and threats like these are a cruel way to make employees, our ohana and friends, do the fighting for corporate activities on our island that endanger life, health and our collective future.

Workers were paid, transported, and required by the agrochemical companies to show up at the County Council first hearing of the bill, to read testimonies for the agriochemical companies. But workers are speaking with friends and family now, and they are learning more about the benefits of Bill 2491 for them and their families.

What is the cost of disclosure to these companies?

Disclosure of already-collected information is not a significant cost to a multibillion dollar industry. There is no reason from a financial standpoint for the agrochemical companies to tell all of their
employees that they will be fired if Bill 2491 passes. If workers are fired, it is only because the agrochemical companies' decision makers considered that profits at any cost were more important than their workers lives.

The companies already keep internal records on pesticide application activity. Bill 2491 requires that they make this information readily accessible to the public. Our County leaders must require that
disclosure is a cost of doing business on our island.

Do Restricted Use Pesticides (RUP's) really cause illness?

Yes. There is more and more research being released that shows links between RUP's and health impacts.

Atrazine, for example, is known to cause birth defects, cancer and reproductive issues. Lorsban is known to cause impaired brain and nervous system functions in children and fetuses, even in minute
amounts. Some RUPs are shown to effect brain cancer, autism, and heart

and liver problems. Children are at especially high risk of illness from pesticide exposure. For these reasons, many of the RUPs used on Kaua’i are banned in other countries.

There are also peer reviewed studies that show that between 1996-2011, GMO activity accounted for an additional 404 million pounds of pesticides during that period. Much of that additional pesticide was used for testing activities, such as the agrochemical activities on Kaua'i.

Do the people of Kauai have the right to decide on this law?

Yes. The County Council is legally allowed to protect the people of Kauai.

Bill 2491 has been reviewed by many attorneys at the state and national level who concluded that there is nothing in the law that prevents Kaua'i from deciding how we want to protect the `aina, our
children and communities.

Additionally, our State Constitution requires that the State and counties:
“shall provide for the protection and promotion of the public health”
and “shall have the power to promote and maintain a healthful
environment”
and
“shall conserve and protect Hawaii’s natural beauty and all natural resources, including land, water, air, minerals, and energy sources, and shall promote the development and utilization of these resources in a manner consistent with their conservation and in furtherance of the self-sufficiency of the State. All public natural resources are held in trust by the State for the benefit of the people.”
But shouldn’t the US EPA and State be protecting us?

Don’t they have the resources and knowledge to do so? Ideally, all levels of government should be working to protect the public good. But the simple fact is that they are not, and we need to address this serious current issue of massive pesticide use now.

Because Kauai has more experimental pesticide and GMO operations than any other county in the State, our circumstances are unique and we must lead the way.

The agrochemical industry claims that the EPA already regulates restricted use pesticides, but the US Government Accountability Office has officially found that the EPA is severely lacking in its ability
to regulate pesticide use. Read the US General Accountability Office Report here.

What is the Waimea residents’ lawsuit against Pioneer about?

Waimea area residents are concerned about the impacts of DuPont-Pioneer’s experimental pesticide and GMO operations on their health, property, the environment, and farmers. In 2011, residents filed a suit citing multiple violations of law in pesticide and land management upwind of homes and schools.

Read the official Court claim by Waimea residents here.

How can I get involved?

Submit your testimony to CouncilTestimony@kauai.gov. Every voice counts, and the Council NEEDS to hear from you.

You can also testify in person, or just come to show support, on July 31 at the Kauai Community College Performing Arts Center. Click here for the Garden Island announcement for this public hearing.

Sign the petition and learn more about Bill 2491 at the Bill 2491

Educate yourself. Stay connected to through StopPoisoningParadise.org and join the movement of thousands that want the Right to Know on Kauai.

.

Bill 2491 hearing in new venue

SUBHEAD: GMO companies are resorting to deception and subterfuge to keep unrestricted use of Kauai.

By Juan Wilson on 27 July 2013 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2013/07/bill-2491-hearing-in-new-venue.html)


Image above: GMO companies - wolves in sheep's clothing. From (http://onepotato.net/index.php/blog/blog_entry/blunderbuss/).

The Kauai County Council announced through the Garden Island Newspaper that it has changed the venue of the up coming public hearing on Bill 2491 to regulate pesticide usage and GMO experiments on our island.

The Kauai County Council announced the public hearing for Bill 2491 will be held at Kauai Veterans Center, rather than the previously announced location at Kauai Community College.
The controversial bill proposes disclosure of pesticide use and sets up buffer zones for crops of genetically modified organisms.
“We know that many have made arrangements to attend this public hearing on this particular date, so I have decided to keep the (same) public hearing date and time,” Chair Jay Furfaro said in a press release.
The public hearing will still be held 1:30 p.m. Wednesday Kauai Veterans Center, which will have more seating available than the previous venue. Seating is still on a first-come, first-served basis.
“We regret any inconvenience this change in location may cause, but nonetheless look forward to a respectful, orderly, and productive public hearing that accurately exemplifies the aloha spirit of our Kauai citizens,” Furfaro said.
Those who wish to present their comments on the bill may do so at the public hearing.
KVC is at 3215 Kapule Highway, between Lihue Airport and Rice Street.
Needless to say, this hearing is of vital importance to anyone living on Kauai. Please attend and testify.

Tactics by the GMO Chemical Companies
Two recent items have come to our attention about the strategies of the GMO corporations activities.

One item is from Blake Drolson concerning phone calls to Kauai residents about testifying on Bill 2491. Blake emailed this message:
The other side is phoning Kau'i residents with propaganda and trying to get you to record testimony AGAINST our bill (2491) !!!

A friend said they got a telephone poll call from Hawaii Crop Improvement asking to record a message to the Council that stated that you opposed Bill 2491 (They did not use the Bill #).

First asked if they opposed the Bill. They said they supported it. Then they were asked to record a message to the Council in opposition. They said again they support it and had sent written testimony to that effect.

They decided perhaps they should record a support message so that their opinion would be correctly registered. They were given instruction on how to proceed and again were told that the message would be in opposition.
When they again stated that they were in favor of the Bill, that was acknowledged and then just before beginning to record the woman provided language that would be in opposition. So they refused to record because each time recording was mentioned they received a message that it would be in opposition to the Bill and they supported it.

There were many statements made in the conversation in favor of opposition to the bill. This was not an unbiased poll. The call came from telephone number 221-0175.

What you can do:
  • If you support Bill 2491, DO NOT RECORD A MESSAGE.

  • Write a email blast to all your Kauai friends to let them know that it is happening, especially if they are not on facebook and such.

  • Call important people you know.

  • Invite all your friends to write a testimonial: Here the how-to and more information http://www.stoppoisoningparadise.org/#!get_involved/c8k2
Stay pono, educate yourself, research your questions, talk to your family and friends about pesticides and the bill.
The other item is from Jo Amsterdam from Kalaheo. Yesterday she reported she saw smoke from the extensive Alexander & Baldwin property between Port Allen and Lawai. As you might know, over 3,000 acres of that property is leased to Kauai Coffee. Amongst that acreage there are several GMO corn seed fields that A&B has leased to DuPont Pioneer.

Ms. Amsterdam drove up to the Kukuiolono Golf Course for a better look and discovered that the smoke was coming from areas adjacent to GMO corn fields that were being burned and cleared - presumably for more growing GMO corn.

Jo also confirmed she had been called twice by a polling operation that read a scripted statement and offered her to help her testify on the bill. However, they told her that they would characterize any testimony as opposition to Bill 2491.

.

Obama remembered for Totalitarianism

SOURCE: Jonathan Jay (jjkauai@gmail.com
SUBHEAD: This isn’t our grandparents’ totalitarianism; but it is totalitarian.  It is totalitarianism Obama-style.

By Andrew Levine on 26 June @013 for CounterPunch - 
(http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/07/26/obamas-legacy-before-snowden-and-now/)


Image above: detail of illustration of "President Panopticon" by Jonathan Jay. Click for whole image.

Like Jackie Robinson, Barack Obama will be remembered for crossing a seemingly infrangible color line.

However the comparison stops there. Playing in the major leagues, even for the Brooklyn Dodgers, hardly compares with becoming President of the United States.

On the other hand, Robinson did an outstanding job and his achievement has had lasting beneficial consequences. Can anyone who is not an abject booster claim as much for Obama?

After that memorable Grant Park moment on election night and the concert in front of the Lincoln Memorial on the weekend before his first inauguration, there is not much more positive to say about the job he has done.

In addition to breaking the color line, there is also a chance that Obama will be remembered for major environmental catastrophes, though it is not likely inasmuch as sins of omission are less salient than sins of commission, and he is just one in a very long line of do-nothing American – and world — leaders.

To be remembered mainly for wrecking the planet, he would have to do something spectacular to promote global warming – letting frackers loose everywhere, for example, or actively promoting tar sands oil. If he stays true to form, he is more likely just to let those things happen than to take charge of them himself.

If he gives the nuclear power industry free rein, and an inevitable accident occurs that renders large parts of the continent uninhabitable, all bets are off. But that would have to happen on his watch, and the chances of that are also low.

And so, until not long ago, it looked like Obama would be remembered mainly for his role in fashioning a new model perpetual war regime.

Whereas before Obama, Constitutional restrictions on the executive branch’s power to take the country to war were acknowledged before being bypassed, they are now blatantly disregarded.

Whereas before he – and his predecessor — took office, the United States at least seemed to respect national sovereignty and to abide by longstanding tenets of international law (many of which it had helped establish), it has now become, functionally and unabashedly, a lawless state.

And whereas before Obama, “war” meant “boots on the ground,” it now means drones hovering in the air and “special” operatives poised to strike at the Commander-in-Chief’s pleasure. Private contractors (unaccountable mercenaries) and semi-secret commando units trained in the dark arts of sabotage and assassination are the new GI Joes. [The old GI Joes now busy themselves going after GI Janes.]

Obama’s idea is not so much to keep the economic conscripts who comprise our “volunteer” armed forces out of harm’s way; it is to keep domestic opinion on the empire’s side.

The best way to do that now, in his view, is not to try to turn the public bellicose; that is so Bush-Cheney. Obama would rather keep the public on board by keeping it uninformed.

For their war mongering, Bush and Cheney got all the media help they could ask for. Obama expects the same for his efforts to bamboozle public opinion. So far, he has not been disappointed.

He was therefore on track for being remembered as the Drone President, the President who hid the empire’s juggernaut under the radar, as it were, both literally and figuratively.

Of course, he and his circle of advisors know that news of their murderous ways cannot be entirely suppressed, and they understand that blowback is virtually certain.

But they figure, not unreasonably, that just as the Afghanistan and Iraq wars would not have been possible had the draft still been in operation, future wars will not be possible if they produce too many “wounded warriors” and if, like the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, they give rise to suicide epidemics among returning troops.

Let robots do the dirty work, therefore; and, when that is not enough, source out the killing to borderline psychopaths whom public-relations spinmeisters then turn into daring-do heroes.

The problem the empire’s stewards face is that it is becoming increasingly clear – domestically, as well as internationally — that American world dominance is a curse for all but the handful of obscenely rich capitalists who depend on it; and, of course, for those who benefit directly from the existence of an increasingly onerous military-industrial-national security state complex.

But those beneficiaries are the “folks,” as Barack Obama might say, who call the shots.

This is why Obama will be remembered as President Drone. But that is not all he will be remembered for.

We know this thanks to Edward Snowden.



Snowden’s David and Goliath story is still unfolding – because while the empire’s victims everywhere applaud him, their leaders, most of them anyway, cannot be bothered to help him.

Despite offers of asylum from the popular-democratic governments of Venezuela, Ecuador, and Nicaragua – countries that until recently suffered mightily under the weight of American domination and that still have much to lose by defying Obama’s wishes — and despite the ambivalent support of the Russian government, Snowden has been holed up for more than a month in the transit section of Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport.

Reportedly, he is about to be accorded temporary asylum in Russia – at last – though getting past the final bureaucratic hurdles seems to have taken on Kafkaesque dimensions. Then perhaps, in due course, he will be able to proceed on, in safety, to refuge in Latin America.

No doubt, we will someday learn why it is taking so long, and why, even without “documentation,” Russia cannot have simply put him on a plane to Cuba, from where he could easily reach his final destination. This was Snowden’s plan weeks ago, when it seemed that Ecuador was prepared to give him refuge.

Would Obama dare impede a commercial Aeroflot flight the way he forced the plane carrying Evo Morales, Bolivia’s head of state, to land for inspection (for Snowden) in Vienna – in plain violation of international law?

Boris Yeltsin let the United States get away with almost anything it wanted; though it must be conceded, in partial mitigation, that, in the throes of a devastating regression back into capitalism, Russia was at the time extremely enfeebled.

By now, though, Russia is strong enough to uphold its dignity. And Vladimir Putin, for all his flaws, is no Yeltsin. Could that macho man nevertheless feel intimidated? Why the long hesitation?

These are peripheral mysteries, interesting but of no great importance.

The important thing is that thanks to Snowden’s revelations, Obama will no longer be remembered just for his drones or for the escapades of his assassins. He will be remembered as the Surveillance President as well.

These legacies are not as distinct as may appear, and not just because full spectrum surveillance is helpful for selecting targets to maim and kill. The affinities run deeper.

The two are functionally of a piece because they both aim at the same goal: control over everything that can possibly bear on the fortunes of the elites Obama serves.



The word “totalitarianism” has a long, vexed and ideologically tendentious history.

The general idea is that totalitarian regimes concentrate all power into their own hands with a view to imposing common beliefs and values. Their goal is to repress the consequences of social divisions, installing, in their stead, a unified collective will.

Italian fascists used the term to characterize their own ideology.

Then Cold War anti-Communists used it to identify Communism with Fascism on the grounds that both systems are hostile to privacy rights, independent media, free trade unions, and indeed to all civil society institutions that the state (or ruling Party) does not control.

The intended contrast was with liberalism though, plainly, there are varieties of illiberalism that are not totalitarian.

In any case, with Fascism no longer a pole of attraction or even a topic of much interest to the general public, the term was used pejoratively during the waning years of the Cold War to describe Communist societies only.

By then, the goal of forging a unified collective will had long been abandoned inside the Communist bloc, if indeed it had ever been seriously entertained. But methods developed for suppressing dissent – totalitarian methods – still flourished there.

Communist countries excelled especially at surveillance. With the technologies available at the time, they were as good at it as any state could.

But that was then; post-9/11 America puts them to shame.

It has dawned on many, in Germany especially, that the old East German Stasi, the archetypical totalitarian institution, could not begin to compete with our National Security Agency. If the Stasi made the German Democratic Republic totalitarian, what does the NSA make the United States?

That the American government surveilled everything it could had long been suspected; thanks to Snowden’s whistle-blowing, this suspicion has now been confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt.

And a new model totalitarianism has therefore been revealed: it is exemplified in the world Obama wants to create, the world Snowden exposed.

One would think Obama would be proud: USA! Number One!! Instead, as a totalitarian would, he made Snowden public enemy Number One.

In promoting a new kind of totalitarianism, just as in forging a new war order, Obama is not so much an innovator as an accelerator of processes long in motion.

Because knowledge is power, governments everywhere have always wanted to know everything. What is new now is that to a degree that is historically unprecedented, the American government has the means and opportunity to realize this age-old perfidious dream.

Of course, it hasn’t realized it perfectly; and probably never will – even if resistance remains insufficient for reversing Obama’s course.

“Totalitarianism” was always more aspirational than real; this is as true of Obama’s version as of Mussolini’s. But the technology now is there, and the approximations are getting closer to the ideal.

This is why the Drone President is likely to be remembered too for being the most successful totalitarian leader in American history.



This twin legacy is best understood when the nature of the empire Obama presides over is taken into account.

It is unlike the empires of the past, including the recent past, because it is not directly territorial.

Washington works its will through the offices of officially sovereign states. It has no extra-territorial provinces and its few colonies are largely self-governing.

Our empire is not territorial in another way too; its boundaries are undefined.

The state of Israel refuses to declare its boundaries officially because it is in the thrall of a strain of Zionist ideology that leads Israeli governments to covet the entire mythical (“biblical”) “land of Israel.”

The American empire covets the whole world – not to settle it or to rule it administratively, or to realize a covenant a realtor-God made with a Middle Eastern patriarch several millennia ago. It covets everything because its elites are in the thrall of limitless greed.

But even they will make common cause with cooperative subordinates. This is why there are parts of the world – the European Union, the “white” dominions of the former British empire, Japan and other developed Pacific rim nations — that are, for the time being, immune from Obama’s drones.

China and Russia are probably immune too – because they are too big and powerful to be run over roughshod. This is plainly true of China; what happens with Snowden will tell, for now, whether Russia is equally immune.

Like all his predecessors since the Soviet Union fell, Obama would plainly like to treat Russia as a subordinate, much as he treats the UK or France.

For Snowden’s sake and therefore for the sake of transparency and an informed citizenry – for the sake, in other words, of all the preconditions for democratic governance – let us hope that he cannot.

In any case, when it comes to drones and assassins, it is open season everywhere outside the zone of immunity.

And when it comes to surveillance, it is open season literally everywhere – including, above all, right here in the Land of the Free.

This isn’t our grandparents’ totalitarianism; but it is totalitarian according to the literal meaning of the word. It is totalitarianism Obama-style.

As much as for the murder, mayhem and terror his drones unleash, and for much the same reason, it is what Obama will be remembered for. Thanks to Snowden it is now plain that this too will be Obama’s legacy.

• Andrew Levine is a Senior Scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies, the author most recently of THE AMERICAN IDEOLOGY (Routledge) and POLITICAL KEY WORDS (Blackwell) as well as of many other books and articles in political philosophy. His most recent book is In Bad Faith: What’s Wrong With the Opium of the People. He was a Professor (philosophy) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a Research Professor (philosophy) at the University of Maryland-College Park. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press).


.

Fukushima burns on and on

SUBHEAD: Two and a half years on and all Tepco does is pour cold water on speculation and the melted cores.

By Juan Wilson on 26 July 2013 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2013/07/fukushima-burns-on-and-on.html)


Image above: Scientists simulate a core meltdown and concrete reaction at Argonne National Laboratory. From (http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/04/the-most-dangerous-manmade-lava-flow/).

There has been a lot worry in the last few weeks about worsening conditions at what was once the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Now it is a deadly wasteland spewing radioactive meterial into the surrounding countryside, the water table and the Pacific Ocean.

The operators, Tepco and the Japanese government are finally admitting that their current strategy of simply pouring 100,000 gallons of water a day on the rubble covering the three melted nuclear cores isn't 100% safe.  They have been trying to retrieve the cooling water and store it on site. Millions of gallons on highly radioactive water sits in plastic containers crowding the plant site with no present way of safely processing it.

Tepco now admits that not only that some of the storage containers are leaking, but that since 2011 radioactive cooling water has leaked into the local aquifer by and is eventually reaching the ocean. If that's all that was happening it would not be so bad.

Some reasonable people are worried that this "treading water" by Tepco brings the world no closer to a solution to the present danger of that the melted cores of three nuclear reactors represent. It seems clear that the cores of reactor units 1, 2 and 3 did more than just melt inside the reactor containment.

The mixture of nuclear fuel, fission products, control rods, and structural materials from the affected parts of the reactor that melted together are called corium. The heart of corium it is the highly radioacive uranium and plutonium fuel.

There is evidence that the corium has not only burned its way through the reactor and its containment, but through the two foot thick foundation slab separating Fukushima Daiichi from the earth and water table below, and thus into the Pacific Ocean.

Background material from:
Tepco Says Toxic Water Leaked to Sea
By Tsuyoshi Inajima on 23 July 2013 for Blumberg News - (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-23/tepco-says-toxic-water-leaked-to-sea-from-fukushima-plant.html)
Groundwater laced with radiation from melted reactors at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi atomic plant north of Tokyo has been leaking into the Pacific Ocean, raising concern the toxic water has been flowing into the sea since the disaster at the facility more than two years ago.

Backtracking on previous comments, Tokyo Electric Power Co. (9501) confirmed the groundwater leaks last night, earning a rebuke from the government today to stop the leaks that Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga said were “serious.”

Tepco, as the utility is known, suspected the breach after finding water levels in monitoring wells moving in sync with tidal flows, spokeswoman Kaoru Suzuki said by phone today. The operator doesn’t know when the leaks started or how much radiated water has drained into the ocean, she said. Water samples suggest contamination has been contained in the port area near the Fukushima plant, Suzuki said.

“I don’t know why Tepco was so circumspect about acknowledging that there was a leak,” Jota Kanda, a professor at Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, said by phone today. “Most marine experts who have studied the effect of the Fukushima disaster on surrounding ocean areas hold the view that radioactive water has been leaking from the plant. It’s common sense.”

Fish Worries
Tepco’s announcement angered fishing unions that lost fishing grounds and customers on concern radiation would contaminate catches and enter the food chain. In August last year, the utility found record high levels of radioactive cesium in fish it caught for tests within 20 kilometers of the coast from the nuclear plant.

“Tepco could have told us at least about the possibility of the leaks,” Yoshihisa Kobayashi, an official at the Fukushima Prefectural Federation of Fisheries Co-operative Associations, said by phone today. “I’ve always suspected there may be leaks because radiation levels inside silt fences have remained high though Tepco told us there is no such leak.”

Fish contamination concerns have spread beyond Japan.

A study of 15 Pacific bluefin caught off San Diego in August 2011 found radioactive cesium 10 times higher than in fish caught in previous years.

That provides “unequivocal evidence” that the radiation came from Fukushima, researchers including Daniel Madigan and Nicholas Fisher said in a study published in May 2012 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The level of contamination was not a danger to humans, the study said.

Find the Leak
The finding comes in the same month Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority told Tepco to speed up completion of a seawall to block contaminated water that it suspected was leaking into the ocean. While reporting elevated levels of cesium 137 and 134 in the plant’s groundwater, the utility had maintained that there had been no apparent effect on the adjacent seawater.

The pace of decline in radiation levels slowed in the waters beside the Fukushima plant after June 2011, suggesting that there was a leak, said marine science professor Kanda, whose findings are being reviewed for publication in the journal Biogeosciences.

Tepco needs to pinpoint the source of the leak before it can come up with credible measures to stop it, he said.

Radiation Estimates
Reports differ on how much radiation escaped into the atmosphere and the sea after the Fukushima disaster.

The Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics journal in October 2011 estimated the radiation released was about 42 percent of the 1986 nuclear accident at Chernobyl and that most of it fell into the North Pacific Ocean.

In the same month, the Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, which is funded by the French government, said the Fukushima plant was responsible for the biggest discharge of radioactive material into the ocean in history. Tepco in May last year estimated the total radiation release was about 17 percent of Chernobyl.

Human exposure to radiation at moderate to high levels can lead to cancers, such as leukemia, according to the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. The body, known as UNSCEAR, is in charge of the most comprehensive study of the Fukushima disaster and is expected to deliver its report to the UN in October this year.

Containment Vessel
Tepco also said in an e-mailed statement today that steam from an unknown source that was first spotted near the fifth floor of the Fukushima plant’s No. 3 reactor building on July 18 was seen again around 9 a.m. By 1:30 p.m., it was no longer visible, the company said.

The steam was probably the result of atmospheric moisture evaporating against the outer wall of the containment vessel, which is warmer than air temperatures, spokesman Yusuke Kunikage said by phone.

The utility found no significant changes to the unit’s containment vessel temperature and other readings, it said in the statement.

The handling of highly radioactive water is an issue that has vexed Tepco as the utility oversees the plant’s cleanup. Leaks in April raised the prospect the utility would be forced to dump radioactive water in the Pacific.

Radioactive Water
Last month, Tepco said it had found unsafe levels of radioactivity in groundwater at the Fukushima station. The contaminants were found at a monitoring well in a turbine complex at the Dai-Ichi plant.

While the current findings marked the first time the utility has acknowledged that contaminated groundwater was seeping into the ocean, it has had other leaks of radioactive water at the plant. In April last year, it said as much as 12 tons of radioactive water had leaked from a pipe and may have poured into the sea. That followed a leak at the same pipeline 11 days earlier.

The groundwater leakage is a reminder of the complexities facing Tepco as it mops up the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster.
If that wasn't bad enough there is speculation that the three melted cores may have already or may in the future reach a state of criticality; meaning reach a state of nuclear chain reaction. There is not much to find in conventional media about what risks we face, but some of what is in the alternative media is frightening. It's hard for me to evaluate the value of this but here's one opinion.





Image above: The 'Elephant's Foot" is a blob of corium that was cooled before it burned through the basement of the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor. From (http://www.houseoffoust.com/fukushima/corium/corium.html).
Rising Tritium Could Trigger Huge Blasts

By Yoichi Shimatsu on 24 July 2013 for Rence.com -

(http://rense.com/general96/rising.html)

The rising level of tritium measured in kelp samples south of the Fukushima 1 nuclear site is an indicator of intensifying nuclear reactions deep in the soil below the cracked reactors. Following the meltdowns in spring 2011, superheated fuel rods in up to three reactors have penetrated multiple barriers including the core shrouds, containment chambers and concrete foundations, escaping into the porous ground. Now inaccessible and scattered underground, the remnant fuel is getting hot enough to create huge flows of deuterium and radioactive tritium, which are commonly known as heavy water.

Two serious threats are emerging during this tritium build-up:
  • Medical effects of exposure to beta particles on top of gamma radiation from the Fukushima releases.
  • More ominous, the possibility of a tritium-deuterium fusion reaction that triggers a plutonium blast more powerful than the 2011 explosion at Reactor 3.
Apologists for the nuclear industry, including the Wall Street Journal, boldly assert beta radiation emitted by tritium poses no health threat. This irresponsible claim is based on a gross underestimate of the effects of beta rays. While less powerful than gamma radiation, beta radiation can ionize DNA. Externally beta rays can be blocked by a thin sheet of metal foil, but inside human tissues there are no physical barriers to prevent beta particles from rupturing chromosomes.

As summarized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: “The main chronic health effect from (beta) radiation is cancer. When taken internally beta emitters can cause tissue damage and increase the risk of cancer. The risk of cancer increases with increasing dose.” Tritium is a beta emitter.

The argument for tritium safety becomes even more fallacious because heavy water is at a practical level indistinguishable from normal water and readily ingested through beverages, food, bathing and respiration. Beta rays add to the daily exposure level from gamma, alpha, ultraviolet and electromagnetic radiation, significantly raising the risks of cancer and heart failure. Advice for visitors to Fukushima: Don’t drink the water.

Kelp Reveals Hidden Dangers
How prevalent is tritium leaking from Fukushima into the Pacific Ocean? The best estimate, in this early stage of the tritium releases, is based on dosage levels in vegetation at a fair distance from the leaking nuclear site. Beta radiation can be measured with a reasonable degree of accuracy on the border between the coastal villages of Hisanonuma and Yotsukura, inside the exclusion zone 16 kilometers south of the Fukushima No.1 plant.

Fern kelp samples were taken from tide pools by this writer in mid-July, about two months after tritium started to spike. Beta radiation accounted for one-fourth to one-third of the total dosage count, as compared with gamma rays. The beta component raised the per-hour dosage to 0.34 microSieverts, a dangerous level that sets off the alarm buzzer. Constant exposure to that level would result in death for humans within 8 years. Compared with my previous measurements along that coast, the gamma level in kelp has been stable and undiminished since the 311 meltdowns, which is due to annual regrowth of kelp.

The 12-year half life of tritium means that large quantities will be appearing around the Northern Hemisphere, carried by the jet stream and the North Pacific current.

Eerie Fog
An odd observation among local residents is that the presence of tritium is sometimes visible in a spookily dense fog. Amateur fishermen told me that narrow bands of fog hugging the cliffs are frightening enough to deter them from venturing to the shore. The fog was described by a 78-year-old local resident as “moya” or miasma. “Throughout my entire life along this shore, I have never before in summertime seen such an eerie miasma,” he whispered. “It is as if a ghost has descended on our bay.”

Before gathering kelp for Geiger counter and dosimeter measurements, I spotted off in the far distance a band of unseasonable mist lifting in the oppressive heat of noon. Within that fog bank, there were slow-moving clouds, smoldering and tumbling like a witches brew. Too bad that GE and Hitachi executives were not there to take a dip in that bay of beta radiation.

Indeed, a solo brave diver was bobbing in the tritium waves. The tattooed swimmer was gathering sea urchins to sell to sushi bars. His tattoos showed him to be a member in good standing of a local self-help group. The hale fellow opened a shopping bag to show me his undersea treasure. Urchins feed on kelp, absorbing cesium, strontium and tritium into their bright orange sperm sacs.

Uni is a delicacy now deadlier than poison-laced blowfish, and thus a must-gorge for every fanatic foodie and the connoisseur seeking a delicacy to die for. The expensive, salty, fat-rich globs melt on the palate and are best finished with a chardonnay. The exquisite taste hits like a bullet to the brain. A toast to TEPCO!

Creating a Hydrogen Bomb
Nuclear engineers with the Tokyo Electric Power Co. have hewed to the absurdly unscientific belief that hydrogen gas was the cause of the explosion that broke through Reactor 3 on March 15, 2011. Given its relatively low combustion energy, hydrogen cannot possibly crack thick steel alloy. The more probable energy source in that rupture was a fusion reaction between tritium and deuterium. Heavy water produced in abundance inside the reactors, especially during a meltdown.

Just a few grams of tritium and deuterium can merge in a fusion reaction that releases a highly energetic neutron, which then greatly smashes into plutonium, greatly amplifying a fission explosion. The hydrogen bomb that annihilated Nagasaki in August 1945 was a plutonium-based device boosted or triggered by tritium.

The term “hydrogen bomb” is derived from the chemistry of heavy water. Natural water is composed of two atoms of hydrogen and one of water, and thus its symbol H2O. Under bombardment by radioactive isotopes, inside a reactor or in radioactive wastewater at Fukushima, the nucleus of a hydrogen atom can absorb one neutron to become deuterium or two such particles to form tritium.

The Manhattan Project’s design by Edward Teller required precise geometry to use concave mirrors made of beryllium metal to focus the implosion for an interactive tritium-plutonium blast. Can similar conditions be created “spontaneously” inside the mass of rocks and dirt underneath Fukushima No.1?

Hatchery of Destruction
The meltdown of mixed oxide (MOX) fuel, which contains highly enriched plutonium, is suspected of having seared through the shroud, containment chamber and ferroconcrete foundation, thereby escaping into the soil. Steam from vents in the ground, along with tritium releases in leaked water, indicate that the meltdowns are not only continuing but also heating up dramatically.

Lumps of corium can melt the surrounding silicate rock to create a glassy bubble, which traps the tritium and deuterium steam and reflects back their radiation. These subterranean pockets resemble a soft-boiled egg, with a “yolk” of melting nuclear fuel surrounded by the “egg white” of pressurized tritium-deuterium steam inside a “shell” of reflective glazed rock. The self-enclosed reaction chamber will gestate and then hatch with a blast wave of sufficient force to trigger other corium pockets to explode.

The serial nuclear blasts could blow the ground into the sky, momentarily lifting the Fukushima reactors. Then everything will come crashing down into the gaping pit, ending any hopes of quelling the meltdowns. Needless to say, the nuclear workers and local population would be killed by the blast wave or the lethal emissions. The release of vast amounts of radiation would force the evacuation of nuclear plants in operation across Japan, resulting in dozens more meltdowns.

Civilization will become untenable, as hundreds of millions of casualties mount. This is probably a best-case scenario, since the downward blast force could have more dire consequences.

Hell and High Water
The Fukushima nuclear plants rest atop the Abukuma block, a mega-sheet of bedrock uplifted by the subduction of the Pacific plate under the Okhotsk plate. Inside the impact zone, both plates are cracking under enormous pressure, which heats the rock into magma and causes volcanic activity in the region.

The hundreds of tons of escaped nuclear fuel beneath the Fukushma No.1 plant exceeds the combined weight of all fissile material in nuclear-weapons testing to date. If this melting mass of uranium and plutonium were to explode, the seams in the tectonic plates could be blown apart, unloosing rivers of magma onto the Earth’s surface. A vast cloud of radioactive particles, toxic gases, sulfur and industrial waste would encircle the globe with more deadly consequences than the 1883 Krakatoa eruption.. The human species, a parasite dependant on other life-forms and vulnerable to oxygen depletion, will be among the first to go extinct.

Deeper Darker Depths
The coming self-destruction of humankind may well be only a minor prelude to a grand finale for the planet. Could a mega-nuclear blast at a geological pressure point like Fukushima puncture the Earth’s brittle crust and release a flow of hot liquefied minerals from the mantle?

What the little geologists know about the mantle is based on some ancient rock samples and data from ultra-long frequency waves pulsed through the center of the Earth during nuclear-weapons tests. The dominant opinion among Earth scientists is that below the crust is a thick zone of hot viscous rock, which acts in ways similar to asphalt. It seems highly unlikely that the amorphous layer could be as stable as the tarmac on a road since the mantle is heated from below by molten metal. Torsion is also straining the mantle, due to the difference in the rotational speed between the Earth’s surface and its metal core.

The mantle’s fluid dynamics means that a nuclear shock could burst on top of a convection flow, releasing billions of tons of molten mantle onto the planet surface, blanketing the Earth and shooting out fiery lava fountains. If so, the Earth would be propelled out of its orbit like a sputtering and spiraling rocket to the frozen edge of the solar system or, otherwise, into a nosedive toward the Sun. The gravitational disturbance would unhinge the orbits of other planets. Spinning wildly out of control, Earth could collide with another gyrating planet or be pummeled by a horde of asteroids.

Ashes to ashes, dust to dust: The violent destruction of our planet will hardly amount to a footnote since nobody will survive to record the event. On a cosmic scale, human history is a tiny and brief experiment in evolution that has gone awry, adding up to nothing more than a blip in an inconsequential solar system.

Prophecy of How It Ends
This scenario of our home planet becoming engulfed by molten iron is, by strange coincidence, predicted in Buddhist prophecy as the last stage of “mappo”, the historical process of moral degradation of humanity. In their shabby defense of a malignant nuclear industry, the political-industrial oligarchy is bringing about this end-of-world prospect.

The annihilation of our species, along with all life on Earth, is man’s death wish writ large and his last achievement. Prodigal man has proven himself to be a sworn enemy of God the Father and Mother Nature. Thou shalt kill thy father and mother, demand our global leaders, their regional henchmen and media minions as if they too will not be killed.

From either a Judeo-Christian or Buddhist philosophical perspective, the global oligarchs are genocidal criminals, damned in this life and for eternity. Human responsibility, however, means that punishment must not be left to fate. Stern action is required against these diabolical madmen until the last millisecond of the final hour.

Can Criminal Stupidity Be Stopped?
My spirit grows weary of repeating the same formula to the pack of evil morons known as energy executives, nuclear engineers, government bureaucrats and politicians. But here we go again, preaching to the wicked.

The underground corium pockets can be detected by radiation scanners and with blast tomography, which reveals the locations of larger concentrations. Next, steam-injection pumps used at near-exhausted oil fields should be deployed to pump borax solution into those pockets. Borax unlike boric acid, crystallizes in solution, thereby partitioning the underground spaces with neutron-absorbing barriers. Subdivided into smaller cysts, the fissile materials will be deprived of critical mass.

It is guaranteed by the sheer inertia of stupidity and greed that none of this will be carried out. So when push comes to shove, my friends, be sure to push them into the Inferno first before it’s your turn to leap into the fire.

• Yoichi Shimatsu, a Hong Kong-based science writer, is former editor of the Japan Times Weekly.

See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: What the Fukushima? 7/11/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Fukushima Spiking 7/12/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Nuclear Power on the Run 7/18/13
Ea o Ka Aina: Techno-optiminst & Nuke Flack views 7/26/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Fukushima & Hypothyroid in Hawaii 4/1/13


.

Techno-Optimist & Nuke Flack views

SUBHEAD: It's not the shiney future of alternatives to coal, oil and gas but the rosy glow of an nuclear meltdown aftermath.

By Juan  Wilson on 26 July 2013 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2013/07/techno-optimist-nuke-flack-views.html)


Image above: Rosey sunset framing nuclear powerplant cooling towers. From (http://io9.com/5917615/is-nuclear-power-really-on-the-way-out).

Two recent  comments on the this site have set me to looking again at the ongoing threats of Fukushima Daiichi. See the following article for more.

First up a shining energy future of solar, wind, nuclear and fusion power.
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2013/07/no-to-agriculture.html)

TheOldTechnician said 3:27 PM, July 25, 2013
Hello again;

You are relying on the Bible for your technical and science arguments? Yes modern farming requires modern tools. A technological society will always require materials, but so did ancient societies. But the point is technology can and will be sustainable. Nor does technology require coal mines or never ending pollution (which ancient societies also produced, every time they lit a fire).

If you don't think camp and cooking fires don't cause significant amounts of pollution, then you ought to visit Nairobi, Kenya and other densely populated areas that still rely on charcoal cooking. The smog can get quite thick at times. We use coal/oil/gas mostly for energy.

That can be filled in with solar, wind, nuclear, fusion (yes fusion! it's coming!) and a smattering of other technologies. We can make our own hydrocarbons straight from water and CO2. Google "Joule Unlimited" to see how. With 5% and 8% of the Earth's crust comprised of iron and aluminum respectively, we'll never, ever run out of those. But we're not making much more land.

That is why Efficiency is paramount and a necessary condition for sufficiency. You want to talk about sustaining life for all time? Then we need technology to spread Earth life to the stars because, sooner or later, there is an asteroid coming with our names on it.

And if that doesn't wipe out life, the sun's evolution of the next few hundred million years will. Geologically speaking, Earth life only has so much time to get moving.

Mitch


Juan Wilson said at 4:02 PM, July 25, 2013
Aloha Mitch TheOldTechnicion,
Fusion? You gotta be kidding.
That was the stuff of dreams for adolescents in the 60's. back in 2005 when we were getting our heads wrapped around the consequences of peak oil a friend assured us our computers would be running on desktop cold fusion in a couple of years, but it had to be kept secret. God forbid a species as dull witted and self destructive as our current set of techno-optimists don't have unlimited access to "free" energy. Things are bad enough at $100 a barrel for crude oil.
Worse yet would be spreading ourselves to the stars. We are still incapable of not shitting in our own nest. Who on what star would welcome us with our track record - or would we just kill whoever we might find on an Earth-like planet.
The hubris is truly tragic.
Let's see first if we can save this planet and the other megafauna on the journey with us. P.S. as a techno-optimist perhaps you have a plan for solving the tritium problem emerging a Fukushima Daiichi.
It appears the melted cores are getting further out of control. Perhaps it could be the site of a fusion power station? Seems a shame to let all that good energy go to waste. Juan


Secondly a rosy picture of our present nuclear industry by one of its flacks.
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2013/07/nuclear-power-on-run.html)

Scott Peterson said at 4:05 AM, July 26, 2013
Your readers should not be fooled by one person's conjecture about the viability of America's nuclear energy facilities. Judgments about the viability of any given nuclear plant are business decisions made by energy companies based on economic factors unique to their market and facilities. 
Prior to this year, not a single one of the nation's 104 reactors had closed for any reason since 1998. More to the point, nuclear energy facilities showed their worth during the recent oppressive heat wave that baked the eastern states. Nuclear power plants are by far the most efficient and reliable generators of electricity. 
Throughout the heat wave, all but a handful of reactors in 31 states operated at full power around the clock. That is the strongest possible viability statement. The fundamentals in the electricity sector continue to present a strong case for the value of nuclear energy. Natural gas prices are low today, but already are rising. 
Historically, rapid increases in the use of natural gas for electricity production or other industries have resulted in major price volatility. That is why diversity of fuel supply for electricity generation is one of the most important aspects of a secure energy supply portfolio. 
That is particularly true given the Energy Information Administration's projected need for a 28-percent increase in electricity demand by 2040, or the equivalent of about 340 large-scale power plants. 
Scott Peterson
Senior Vice President-Communications
Nuclear Energy Institute 


Juan Wilson said at 10:05 AM, July 26, 2013
Aloha Scott,
You are obviously paid flak for the nuclear power industry. You may believe the hype yourself, but I doubt that any readers of this blog will take your comment seriously. But I'll try. 
You really ought to take a second look at the big picture. It will not be possible in the near future to replace, maintain, or even safely dispose of the nuclear reactors that exist today. Global warming is in the mix and there is nothing that will stop climate change and other negative consequences. 
One highly negative by product of climate change, besides the increased storms and ocean surges and rising seas that will challenge many nuclear power sites is the simple problem of cooling water. There simply won't be enough. 
Moreover, despite the rosy picture painted by the oil and gas fracking industry, the short lived boost in fossil fuel production will be offset by the technology's lightning fast depletion. 
Bottom line, Peak Oil is still real and threatens our high-tech industrial capacity. The manufacturing, transportation, operations, and maintenance regimens required of nuclear plant safety will be insufficient. Hell we can hardly keep our roads and bridges intact. 
As it stands now, there is hardly sufficient capability to safely decommission our existing aging nuke plants... there certainly is not the will. We need to live within sustainable means on this planet - nuclear power has no part in that future. It's time to power-down. Juan Wilson Architect-Planner Publisher of IslandBreath.org


Lastly, besides the professional flacks and the amateur techno-optimists...
There are intelligent people espousing nuclear power to keep civilization running. That includes people who should know better, like James Lovelock (Gaia Principle), Stewart Brand (Whole Earth Catalog) and Stephan Hawking (Blackhole Physics).

They are right in one sense, there is no easy alternative energy way to keep the status quo going.  So let's not.

.

NSA can't search its own emails

SUBHEAD: This is an agency monitoring millions of communications globally and they can’t track their own email.

By by Justin Elliott on 23 July 2013 for ProPublica -
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/23/nsa-emails_n_3641438.html)


Image above: The NSA's new data center in Bluffdale, Utah, which is expected to open later this year and will contain some of the world's fastest supercomputers. From original article.

The NSA is a "supercomputing powerhouse" with machines so powerful their speed is measured in thousands of trillions of operations per second. The agency turns its giant machine brains to the task of sifting through unimaginably large troves of data its surveillance programs capture.

But ask the NSA, as part of a freedom of information request, to do a seemingly simple search of its own employees' email? The agency says it doesn’t have the technology.

"There's no central method to search an email at this time with the way our records are set up, unfortunately," NSA Freedom of Information Act officer Cindy Blacker told me last week.

The system is “a little antiquated and archaic," she added.

I filed a request last week for emails between NSA employees and employees of the National Geographic Channel over a specific time period. The TV station had aired a friendly documentary on the NSA and I want to better understand the agency's public-relations efforts.

A few days after filing the request, Blacker called, asking me to narrow my request since the FOIA office can search emails only “person by person," rather than in bulk. The NSA has more than 30,000 employees.

I reached out to the NSA press office seeking more information but got no response.

It’s actually common for large corporations to do bulk searches of their employees email as part of internal investigations or legal discovery.

“It’s just baffling,” says Mark Caramanica of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. “This is an agency that’s charged with monitoring millions of communications globally and they can’t even track their own internal communications in response to a FOIA request.”

Federal agencies’ public records offices are often underfunded, according to Lucy Dalglish, dean of the journalism school at University of Maryland and a longtime observer of FOIA issues.

But, Daglish says, “If anybody is going to have the money to engage in evaluation of digital information, it’s the NSA for heaven’s sake.”

For more on the NSA, read our story on the agency’s tapping of Internet cables, our fact-check on claims about the NSA and Sept. 11, and our timeline of surveillance law.
.

GMO crops are worse than sugarcane

SUBHEAD: We are an isolated, compliant population far from everywhere else with plenty of sun and water. What a perfect petridish.

By Juan Wilson on 24 July 2013 for island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2013/07/gmo-crops-are-worse-than-sugarcane.html)


Image above: The last sugarcane harvest in 2009 at Gay & Robinson's mill in Kaumakani. From (http://www.flickr.com/photos/inter-island_helicopters/5005723411/).

Sugarcane plantations were a disaster for Hawaii. They displaced the Hawaiian lifestyle by privitizing the water and land. They polluted the water and stripped the topsoil for money.

The plantations started here on Kauai in 1839 in Koloa. The local missionaries saw the extensive irrigation systems of Hawaiians in the Koloa Field System that utilized the Waikomo Stream with great efficiency to grow taro, feed fish ponds and even grow some sugar.

The industrialization of sugar plantations began by getting all the water necessary for large scale operation for the Koloa Sugar Mill. The monoculture sugarcane plantation also required tremendous amounts of cheap manual labor, as early on the work was not mechanized.

The only way to keep such workers was to make them essentially peons - that is a member of a servile feudal class bound to the land and subject to the will of its owner. 
 
This was not attractive to the Hawaiians who could live a better life with less strife - at least until their water and land was confiscated and disease reduced their population. In the  meantime it was necessary for the plantations to import labor from China, Japan, and the Philippines.

Over the decades the imported labor intermingled and married into the remaining Hawaiians. Many of the "Hawaiians" today are the descendants of these unions.  Some of what is seen today as Hawaiian tradition results from the unique culture of these descendants and their lives on plantations.

In the mid 1980s sugar was being replaced by high-fructose-corn-syrup (HFCS) in carbonated soda and was becoming a replacement for sugar as a flavor enhancer in all kinds of food. It was simply cheaper to produce and more addictive; like methamphetamines replacing cocaine. Profits swelled with American waistlines.
 
But even after the era of suagarcane dominance passed in the 1980's, even as the company town monopolies faded, the sugar mills struggled on burning their crops and stripping the soil.

By then there were fewer laborers and they weren't company peons... but debt serfs - with mortgages, car payments, credit card interest and utility bills. Unless they were educated or got a county job, they had to keep their work at the mill as much as the peons before them.

GMO HFCS to the rescue!
After the turn of the millennium there was only one operational sugarmill on Kauai, Kamuakani run by Olokele Sugar on Gay & Robinson's old plantation.  G & R knew the jig was up and struggled to find a way to carry on - maybe they could convert the mill into a power station and burn sugarcane to make electricity? Well, that didn't happen.

What saved some of the few jobs left in the industry was the GMO cornseed industry... ironically the source of almost all HFCS.

Only a handfull of jobs for local people are left compared with the numbers in the past needed for sugarcane work. The GMO companies say that number is about 600 people. How many of those are managers and technicians imported from the mainland is not shared. However, those jobs held by local people are obviously supremely important. But what is the cost to Kauai?

GMO Failing to handle pests
The GMO seed companies are doing open field experimental tests through the application of cocktails of restricted use pesticides (RUPs) on genetically mutated plants. This is worse for the people of Kauai than sugarcane operations.Why?

The GMO seed industry is finding that a simple Round-Up Ready BT corn plant no longer can handle the variety of insects and weeds (like root beetles and pigweed) that have become resistant to the GMO pesticides.

The answer by these chemical companies, posing as seed companies, is to escalate the use of pesticides. Now Dow and Monsanto are asking USDA to approve its new “2,4-D resistant” corn and soy seed. That's one of the chemicals made famous by Agent Orange, the defoliant that damaged so many Vietnamese and US soldiers in the 1960's.

If approved where will 2,4-D be applied in open field tests - on Kauai.

Unless you have been asleep since 2007, you know that RUPs have been found in the Kauai westside school playgrounds and backyards of the very people working in the GMO fields. This is one reason why GMO crops are worse than sugarcane. It's one thing to put up with the smoke and dust for sugarcane harvest - it's another watch a child sicken in reaction to constant pesticide applications.

Looking forward to GMO Free Kauai
GMOs won't save the world or save us. They will only save the chemical companies that sell the poison. Kauai should be looking for a way out of the GMO business.

We should find work for hundreds of local people employed by DOW, DuPont, Syngenta, BASF, Monsanto, etc. There is plenty that is needed to do here to feed ourselves. Many of these people know how to grow food, hunt and fish better than anybody else.

The failure of GMO crops to save the world and the toxic environment they are developed in is coming into national media attention. As it does it will do direct and lasting damage to our tourist industry. There are already signs. 
  • Tourists see that their rental car is passing acres of GMO corn in front of the Kukui Grove Mall.
  • They may know that there are DuPont-Pioneer corn experiments in several fields just out of sight of the Kauai Coffee tourist visitor's center.
  • They may become aware that their turtle snorkel adventure is happening in a bay with the run-off of the DOW AgroScience GMO efforts.
  • They may find out their campsite at Poli Hale State Park is downwind from the overnight spraying by Syngenta of experimental pesticides on adjacent land.
Would you want to drive by, visit, swim and sleep with your famity next to such activities?

Just remember that the tourism/hospitality industry has six times as many workers as all the agriculture, forestry and fishing jobs on Kauai. Until there is a replacement, tourism is the Big kahuna of Kauai's economy.

Lastly, DOW, DuPont, Syngenta, BASF, and Monsanto are all mammoth multinational chemical companies that have a history of creating munitions, weaponry, poison gas and pesticides. These corporations care nothing about Kauai other than it is a convenient place to experiment with poisons.

We are an isolated, compliant population far from everywhere else with plenty of sun and water. What a perfect petridish for experiments with pesticides on humans.

.

Kauai's Struggle for Health

SUBHEAD: Health and the environment have become the number one issue with GMO operations on Kauai.

By Andrea Brower on 17 July 2013 for CivilBeat -
(http://www.civilbeat.com/voices/2013/07/17/19518-gmo-debate-kauais-struggle-for-health-and-the-environment/)


Image above: Pioneer employees who were bussed by DuPont County Council meeting for hearing on Bill 2491 to regulate GMO company pesticide use on Kauai on 6/26/13. From (http://www.flickr.com/photos/inter-island_helicopters/5005723411/in/photostream/). Photo by Juan Wilson.

Born, raised and educated on Kauai, I was brought up with an ethic of care for this land, its future, and the people of this aina. I was also taught that we have kuleana to stand-up for what is right, just, and in the service of the common good — and that sometimes we must struggle for what is pono.

The movement on Kauai to protect our land, water and communities from the impacts of the agrochemical-GMO industry is reflective of this deep sense of responsibility that my generation feels for our home and one another. We know that the decisions being made today will shape our future and that of many generations to follow.

Despite what they would like us to believe, the global agrochemical-GMO industry — corporate giants Pioneer DuPont, Syngenta, Monsanto, Dow, BASF — did not show up in Hawaii merely because we have a year-round growing season. They came because they saw us as an exploitable community, left with an economic void when the sugar plantations exited, and challenged to think outside of the box of plantation agriculture after 150 years of it.

They saw a community of mostly working-class people, already conditioned to accept an industry that exports all of its profits and leaves behind nothing but pollution, health bills and unsafe, low-paying jobs. They came because, despite our enlightened state motto and constitutional mandate to protect the environment, we allow them to get away with doing things that they wouldn’t be allowed to do in other places.

Since GMO testing began in Hawaii, over 3,000 permits have been granted for open-air field trials, more than in any other state in the nation. In 2012 alone, there were 160 such permits issued on 740 sites.

Kauai has the highest number of these experimental sites, which are associated with the use of 22 restricted-use pesticides in the amount of 18 tons of concentrate each year. Syngenta, BASF, Pioneer DuPont and Dow occupy nearly all of the leased agricultural lands on the westside of Kauai — over 12,000 acres in close proximity to schools, residences, churches, and hospitals.

Kauai residents currently do not have the right to know what is happening on these agricultural lands, or how these activities are affecting our common air and water. We do not know which pesticides are being used where, in what amounts, and what their cumulative impacts might be. We also know nothing about the experimental GMO crops being tested. Even when the federal government determines that new pesticide-GMO crop combos significantly affect the quality of the human environment, as the USDA did in the recent case of 2,4-D and dicamba resistant crops, we have no way of knowing whether they were tested here and what their impacts might have been.

Kauai County Council Bill 2491 on pesticides and GMOs seeks to correct this obvious oversight. It is a highly reasonable bill that is applicable only to the five corporations who use tremendous amounts of restricted-use pesticides each year.

The bill establishes people’s right to know about the chemicals that are being used, and sets up a buffer zone between the spraying and schools, hospitals, residential areas and waterways. It also requires that the county conduct an EIS so we can better understand the impacts of the agrochemical-GMO operations on our island, and in the meantime puts a moratorium on new operations. And it mandates that experimental pesticides and GMOs be tested in containment rather than in the open-air.

The pesticides this bill pertains to are not the type you purchase at Ace Hardware. They are “restricted-use” pesticides because they are recognized as extremely dangerous to human health and the environment. Chemicals such as Atrazine (Syngenta), banned in the EU and known to cause birth defects, cancer and reproductive issues, and to contaminate ground-water. Lorsban (Dow), known to cause impaired brain and nervous system functions in children and fetuses, even in minute amounts. Other pesticides being used are shown to affect brain cancer, autism, and heart and liver problems.

Atrazine, chlorpyrifos (Lorsban) and bifenthrin have made it inside Waimea Canyon Middle School, almost certainly the result of drift from the chemical-GMO operations around the school, which is a violation of federal law. Bill 2491 is about our right to know where these highly-dangerous pesticides are coming from so we can determine how they might be affecting human health and the environment. It has nothing to do with whether we are for or against the science and technology of GMOs.

While it would be great if we could count on the state and federal governments to adequately regulate, the fact is that they haven’t. And this issue cannot wait. People are sick now. We need to know now. Our state and federal governments have spent the last decades putting the interests of these transnational corporations over the interests of the common good.

The US government’s own Accountability Office concluded that the EPA is severely lacking in its implementation of laws relating to pesticides. It is up to us on Kauai, the people who have direct experience of the industry’s impacts, to take the necessary action. This bill has been reviewed by many local and national attorneys, and we at the county level have the right to protect our health, safety and environment.

Rather than be responsive to reasonable concerns, the chemical-GMO companies are doing everything they can to fight this bill. They are some of the largest and most powerful corporations in the world, and infamous for their fierce opposition to any kind of disclosure and regulation. This is not a matter of “bad” people doing bad things. These corporations are legally mandated to make profit for their shareholders at other expenses.

Beyond the rhetoric of their well-paid marketing, they do not care about the places where they operate. They may have a few friendly and concerned managers who live locally, but the economic structure that they operate within does not prioritize environmental and human health. That is why this issue requires a structural response — actual policy that will limit these corporation’s ability to externalize their costs onto us.

The industry is using the unfortunate tactic of threatening workers that if this bill passes, their jobs will be lost. While the claim of these incredibly wealthy corporations that they can’t afford to be more responsible in their chemical usage seems exaggerated, if not absurd, we need to be compassionate and sensitive to the position workers are being put in.

If in fact the industry does decide to leave simply because we’ve asked them to be transparent and responsible, then we must generate new agricultural jobs that are higher-paying, less hazardous and long-term. Jobs that express who we are and are integral to our local economy rather than those dependent on the whims of transnational corporations who can get up and leave at anytime.

As an island dependent on barges coming from at least 2500 miles away for 85% of our food, one obvious place for job generation is in developing our sustainable agriculture industry. There are huge possibilities. Half of the lands used by the agrochemical-GMO industry on Kauai are state lands, which could be made more easily available to real farmers. Water that is currently being hoarded by the private chemical industry could be returned to streams and agricultural users, in line with state water law. Subsidy support and research could be consistently put towards sustainable and locally-appropriate agriculture.

By privileging the chemical-GMO companies’ use of our resources over local agriculture, we are paying the high costs of missed opportunities. Sustainable agriculture to service local needs would generate local revenues and stimulate the economic multiplier effect, plug economic leakages, support a wide variety of other small businesses, employ far more people, insure food security, add to the resilience of our economy, distribute benefits more equitably, and be a real draw to tourists.

While we do face structural challenges to building our local agricultural industry, some of which are national or global, there are innumerable creative and immediate solutions. These include a variety of socially responsible enterprises, cooperatives, food hubs, land trusts and ag parks, land use policy in favor of local ag, farmer training, and research funding for sustainable ag. The public will to proactively create and support these solutions keeps growing. Young people especially are looking for opportunities to farm, to be stewards of the aina and feed their communities.

By regulating these transnational corporations, we are supporting the possibility of local agriculture and food security. By protecting our fragile, limited and precious resources, we protect the possibility of real agriculture (that actually feeds us) thriving in the long-term. This is a turning point in the island’s history, one which will determine the type of path we will take.

On Kauai we take pride in our values of care and responsibility for one another and the aina. Now is our moment to lead the state and show the nation how a small community can stand-up for what is obviously moral — putting people and nature’s rights ahead of corporate profits. When it comes to the health of our population and environment, we must demand self-determination. The world is watching, and we will send a clear message, one way or the other.

Andrea Brower is doing a PhD on the politics and economics of food and agriculture. She has a Masters degree in Science and International Development from the University of Sussex.

.

What the Fukashima?

SUBHEAD: Radioactive waste water is piling up at 100,000 gallons a day and leaking into Pacific coean.

By William Boardman on 11 July 2013 in Hawaii News Daily -
(http://hawaiinewsdaily.com/2013/07/what-the-fukushima-2013/)


Image above: Some of the on site storage of highly radioactive waste water from efforts to cool the three melted reactors at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. From (http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-273766/).

The first thing to know about the danger from the radioactive mass remaining on site in the three reactors that melted down at Fukushima is that nobody knows how much radioactive material there is, nobody knows how much uranium and plutonium it contains, and nobody knows how to make it safe — so no one knows how great the continuing danger is.

In order to prevent nuclear material from being diverted to use in weapons, the International Atomic Energy Agency of the U.N. requires each country to report regularly on the volume of nuclear materials in its nuclear power plants. At Fukushima, this is currently impossible with the cores of the three reactors that melted down.

Diversion of this material to weapons use is not a problem at the moment, since the level of radioactivity is high enough to kill anyone who comes close to it, which is why it hasn’t been moved. On the other hand, it is necessary to move it in order to measure it, and even if it was movable now, the technology to measure it does not yet exist.

Cooling the Cores Keeps them from Burning, but Creates Radioactive Water
The Japanese Atomic Energy Agency has joined with the U.S. to develop the necessary new technology, which it hopes to begin using within a decade. The Japanese agency calls this collaboration the “world’s first” attempt at such technology, since a similar U.S. initiative to measure the melted core from the 1979 Three Mile Island accident failed.

As long as Fukushima’s owner, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), keeps the three melted cores and the fuel rods in three other storage pools sufficiently submerged in cooling water, the radioactive material will not overheat, burn, and spew radioactive debris as far as wind or water might take it.

Watertight fuel pools are used effectively at nuclear power plants around the world, including Fukushima before the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami. Now the reactor structures are no longer watertight and TEPCO has pumped millions of gallons of fresh and “least contaminated” into the structures since then, and continues to do so.

Radioactive Water Is Dangerous, And Has To Go Somewhere
Water used to cool nuclear fuel and waste becomes radioactive itself, as does the groundwater that infiltrates the structures. This radioactive water continues to reach the Pacific Ocean in varying quantities, as TEPCO attempts to keep it in check.

As of May 7, the Japan Times reported that TEPCO had installed 290 huge storage talks at Fukushima to hold more than 78 million gallons (290,000 tons) of radioactive water, with another 25 million gallons still uncollected. Fukushima is generating an estimated 100,000-plus gallons (400 tons) of radioactive water every day

TEPCO estimates that groundwater is entering the complex at a rate of at least 54,000 gallons per day. In May 2012, the Japanese government ordered TEPCO to build a wall deep into the ground around the plant to keep groundwater out, a plan that might become operational by early 2015.

TEPCO is expanding its storage capacity to about 1.9 billion gallons by clearing forest and other areas around the compound. While this would probably suffice for another three years, the site is running out of storage space. Additionally, some of the storage tanks have begun to leak and contaminated water is leaking into the soil.

In the Nuclear Business, Truth Has a Limited Half-Life
To address these difficulties, TEPCO is proposing to treat its radioactive water to remove some of the radioactivity, and then release the rest into the Pacific Ocean. There is local opposition to this plan, especially from fishermen.

In July 2012, as some officials were assuring the public that fish from the Pacific were safe to eat, the Japan Fisheries Agency compiled statistics showing the opposite. As reported by a Canadian website, Vancouver’s straight.com:
“The numbers show that far from dissipating with time, as government officials and scientists in Canada and elsewhere claimed they would, levels of radiation from Fukushima have stayed stubbornly high in fish.

In June 2012, the average contaminated fish catch had 65 becquerels of cesium per kilo. That’s much higher than the average of five Bq/kg found in the days after the accident back in March 2011, before cesium from Fukushima had spread widely through the region’s food chain. In some species, radiation levels are actually higher this year than last.”
What We Know is Dwarfed by What We Don’t Know
In March 2013, researchers from the Stanford University Hopkins Marine Station issued a report on Bluefin tuna caught off the California coast and tested for radioactive cesium. The report found that Bluefin tuna were 100 per cent contaminated, that not one was cesium-free. The report did not address such questions as whether cesium would continue to accumulate in tuna or whether it was appearing in other fish species.

The important aspect of this research, according to the Stanford News, was that:
“The work supports the idea that the Fukushima radioisotopes can be used to reliably determine the previously unknown trans-oceanic movements of juvenile Pacific bluefin tuna. This information could be used to prevent tuna from being overfished.”

Would You Like a Side of Hot Seaweed With Your Hot Tuna?
Reporting on the same information, the Two Rivers Tribune in northern California noted:

“On the coast of California, there is a deep sea kelp forest at Corona del Mar that now contains concentrations of radiation that are 250 times higher than levels found in kelp prior to the Japanese nuclear accidents. A research article published in Scientific American reports that radiation accumulated in fish that ate near the kelp…. Presently, there is no research as to what is the exact effect on fish and their offspring will be from the increased levels of radiation that are being found….
“The Japanese government has banned both the domestic sale and international export of most fish that are caught off the Fukushima coast. Radiation levels are still rising two years after the nuclear accidents. In January of 2013 the tested levels of cesium were about 2,540 times what is considered safe for human consumption. Strontium levels are 240 times the legal limit.”

It’s Not a Cover-up If Governments Gather No Useful Information, Is It?
Apparently there is no comprehensive, Fukushima-related radiation testing being carried on by the U.S. Canadian, or other governments whose people are directly affected. Nor is there any international body publicly performing this work.

The Global Monitoring Division of the Earth System Research Laboratory of the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the U.S. Dept. of Commerce monitors global levels of “carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, methane, nitrous oxide, surface and stratospheric ozone, halogenated compounds including CFC replacements, hydrocarbons, sulfur gases, aerosols, and solar and infrared radiation.”

Worldwide nuclear weapons programs and nuclear power generation add ionizing radiation to the atmosphere continuously. NOAA’s website offers five different safety programs related to ionizing radiation. But if NOAA (or any other government entity) is measuring ionizing radiation in the atmosphere, that information is not easily found.

What if “National Security” Depends on Citizens’ Insecurity?

Search the NOAA website for strontium-90 or cesium-137 (one of the more common and more serious products of the Fukushima meltdowns with a half-life of 30 years) and there is one result, which begins promisingly:
“The Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) has maintained a global network of deposition sampling sites for nearly 40 years. Through CMDL support, American Samoa (SMO) and Mauna Loa (MLO) have been a part of this network for many years. This network was initiated to investigate the transport and fate of radioactivity produced from atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons. Strontium-90 was the radionuclide of primary interest due to the relatively high quantity released and its physical and chemical properties that made it a concern to human health.”

But this posting dates from 1996 and includes no data later than 1996.

Radiation Dose So Far Not Harmful, U.N. says – But It’s Not Over Yet
In February the World Health Organization (WHO) of the U.N. released an almost 200-page assessment of the health risks from the Fukushima disaster, “the first-ever analysis of global health effects due to radiation exposure” from Fukushima. In a press release issued in Geneva, WHO concluded that: “for the general population inside and outside of Japan, the predicted risks are low and no observable increases in cancer rates above baseline rates are anticipated.”

Using preliminary dose estimation data to make its predictions, the WHO report also found “that the estimated risk for specific cancers in certain subsets of the population in Fukushima Prefecture has increased and, as such, it calls for long term continued monitoring and health screening for those people.”

The release quotes Dr Angelika Tritscher, Acting Director for WHO’s Food Safety and Zoonosis Department, saying that: “In addition to strengthening medical support and services, continued environmental monitoring, in particular of food and water supplies, backed by the enforcement of existing regulations, is required to reduce potential radiation exposure in the future.”

And the WHO report “notes that the psychosocial impact of Fukushima] may have a consequence on health and well-being. These should not be ignored as part of the overall response.”

If decommissioning of Fukushima ever starts, it will take decades.

According to Natural News reporter Ethan Huff, the lack of reliable information — at least in Japan — may be less the fault of government than mainstream media:
“New data released by Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) shows once again that the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster is far from over. Despite a complete media blackout on the current situation, levels of Cesium-137 (Cs-137) and Cesium-134 (Cs-134) found in produce and rice crackers located roughly 225 miles away from Fukushima are high enough to cause residents to exceed the annual radiation exposure limit in just a few months, or even weeks."

“According to Fukushima-Diary.com, which posts up-to-date information about the Fukushima disaster, rice crackers and tangerines produced in the Shizuoka prefecture are testing high for both Cs-137 and Cs-134.”
Meanwhile in recent weeks, TEPCO reportedly dumped contaminated groundwater into the Pacific, then announced that radiation levels in the seawater near Fukushima had reached record levels, probably because the radioactive water “leaked.”

At the Fukushima site, Energy News reports, workers are expecting the situation with all four reactors to get worse. While there are somewhat credible contingency plans for three of the reactors, the fourth – reactor #2 – has radiation levels that are already so intense, one worker said, that in an emergency, “a prepared squad is likely to perish before it accomplishes its mission.”

Another said, “We are clueless about reactor #2.”

See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: Fukushima Spiking 7/12/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Fukushima & Hypothyroid in Hawaii 4/1/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Nuclear Power on the Run 7/18/13
http://hawaiinewsdaily.com/2013/07/what-the-fukushima-2013/#sthash.71bVe9yB.dpuf.