WikiLeaks defenders' Cyber War

SUBHEAD: Ordinary people are being given instructions on how to mount a cyber attack, and likely many are trying it.

By Larry Geller on 10 December 2010 for Disappeared News - (

Image above: Full out cyber warfare has begun between peoples and their governments. From (

You’ve heard of the cyber attacks against Visa, MasterCard and others who have closed their WikiLeaks accounts, of course. I was surprised yesterday after I followed a link and ended up on a page of instructions on how to join in on the attack. The web page had enough detail that had I wanted to, I’d be in business in probably less than an hour. It’s been since taken down, but mirrors are popping up here and there, so the info should still be available. This is a first.

I can’t recall a similar situation. Ordinary people are being given instructions on how to mount a cyber attack, and likely many are trying it. If this is just a blip on the radar it will still be interesting. If it is more than that, then a new era of “payback” may be dawning in which perceived corporate or government wrongdoing is met by cyber force mounted by thousands of sympathetic individuals.

Here’s more on the group responsible, Anonymous.

WikiLeaks has much of the world incredibly stirred up. This is both good and bad. For example, the news that Obama’s drones have killed 30 innocent civilians in nine recent attacks has almost disappeared. WikiLeaks, WikiLeaks, WikiLeaks. It’s everywhere. It pushes other news out of consciousness.

Not that your average daily newspaper would report on the drone attacks anyway. But at the moment, the websurfing public’s attention is diverted by who is doing what to whom as governments attack WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange, and as ordinary people strike back.

Events are moving very quickly. In the midst of this overwhelm there is some disappeared news. Since I recently wrote about PayPal, I’ll pick up on that one.

It was widely reported that PayPal had received a government letter, as a result of which it closed WikiLeak’s account. Their corporate counsel has just denied this. The new revelation means, if true, that PayPal made a decision on its own, correctly or not, to shut down the WikiLeaks account, and so it is now firmly in the crosshairs of hackers who may well figure how to either shut it down or at least impede its operations.

According to a report by PandaLabs, website attackers have accomplished the following:

After pulling the plug on payments to WikiLeaks, Mastercard’s website was taken down and remains at least partially out of service. Senator Joe Lieberman’s website was taken down for 12 minutes (the first .gov site to be attacked). Sarah Palin’s website was taken offline by a small group of Anonymous attackers. The group sent spam faxes to Joe Lieberman’s office and to PostFinance. PostFinance was attacked the hardest, leaving customers without the ability to conduct online banking. They took down the website of the lawyer representing the two women who were allegedly raped/assaulted by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. The group took down Assange’s Swedish prosecutor’s website.

At this writing, MasterCard and Visa websites are back up. I could not get to PostFinance.

The cyber attack on the credit card companies did not stop ordinary use of the cards. In the case of PayPal, an attack against their API (application programming interface) may interfere with their ability to process transactions. PostFinance probably suffered the most since it is reported that customers could not use their billpay services.

Remember that WikiLeaks is not charged of breaking the law in any country. The hackers are breaking the law, of course, but they are not connected with WikiLeaks.

WikiLeaks itself is now said to be mirrored at over 1,000 sites. It is still operational even though Assange is locked up in Britain. The US government has lost the battle to keep it off the air, at least for now.

Here’s another bit of disappeared news. I’ve heard on the radio and on podcasts that this is also the first time that it is becoming clear in discussions that governments around the world (not just the USA) are working against their people. Duhh…. we knew that already. What’s new is that in a very few places, true, it is being discussed openly. The fact that Congress and the White House are still pampering the rich and starving the poor fits in, as does their failure to extend unemployment benefits. And so on. Each day something comes up to polarize Americans. Today it is denial of health services to 911 first responders.

For the first time in my experience there’s at least some discussion in the US that governments are not working for their own citizens but against them. In Europe that kind of discussion is much more common. Britain’s prince Charles, heir to the throne, was even caught up in a protest yesterday.

In a major security breach, demonstrators set upon the heir to the throne's Rolls Royce as it drove through London's busy West End on its way to a theater. A group of up to 20 struck it with fists, sticks and bottles, breaking a window and splattering the gleaming black vehicle with paint.

That’s Europe. Here, even talk about our government as evildoers is unusual. We haven’t taken to the streets as they have over there. I don’t mean all the crap on Fox News, what I mean is real discussion about why people and their government are opposed. But nothing has gone as far as stirring up major protests European-style.

Maybe we’ll skip the streets and it will just be cyber war. Who knows.

See also: Ea O Ka Aina: Ron Paul supports WikiLeaks 12/10/10 Ea O Ka Aina: Got WikiLeaks? 12/4/10


1 comment :

Unknown said...

DAMAGE cyber WW3 result: 500k hurt diplomats worldwide. billion soldiers on the side line/out of business (and still insist it's not a war); final 200 nations restuctured. other side:few hackers political imprisoned/their parrents fined. After a short (for many long) war only 1 global transparent free society survives .....never thought WW3 as a joke. Yeah all wars are surprises.

How can a few wise leaders alone solve complex global issues pending ? People need to be involved/need same info on these complex issues to let our global society decide & survive.

We NEED transparency for our global society that we created an cannot control.To many crises.
We'd never gone to Iraq if we read the cables first?

its e-government(power) not e-commerce(money) that changes our world!
If democracy fails, the only solution is MORE democracy. The only way is UP.
This is Far worse for China, than the US. It's your Duty to spread your thoughts.

WL to much Change for Obama?
Know It's a hard path, but harder for our totalitarian enemies.

If democracy fails, the only solution is More democracy.
E-vote(power), not E-commerce(money) that changes our world, stupid! greets from citzen 434234243!

Post a Comment