Showing posts with label Adventure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Adventure. Show all posts

Refusing the Call

SUBHEAD: Updating the parable of the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings to our predicament.

By John Michael Greer on 23 April 2014 for the Archdruid Report -
(http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2014/04/refusing-call-tale-rewritten.html)


Image above: Gandalf tries to entice Frodo Baggins to join an adventure. Still frame from the movie "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey".  From (http://inthenameofageek.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-hobbit-unexpected-journey-review.html).

I have been wondering for some time now how to talk about the weirdly autumnal note that sounds so often and so clearly in America these days.

Through the babble and clatter, the seven or eight television screens yelling from the walls of every restaurant you pass and all the rest of it, there comes a tone and a mood that reminds me of wind among bare branches and dry leaves crackling underfoot.

It's as though even the people who insist most loudly that it’s all onward and upward from here don’t believe it any more, and those for whom the old optimism stopped being more than a soothing shibboleth a long time ago are hunching their shoulders, shutting their eyes tight, and hoping that things can still hold together for just a little while longer.

It’s not just that American politicians and pundits are insisting at the top of their lungs that the United States can threaten Russia with natural gas surpluses that don’t exist, though that’s admittedly a very bad sign all by itself.

It’s that this orgy of self-congratulatory nonsense appears in the news right next to reports that oil and gas companies are slashing their investments in the fracking technology and shale leases that were supposed to produce those imaginary surpluses, having lost a great deal of money pursuing the shale oil mirage, while Russia and Iran pursue a trade deal that will make US sanctions against Iran all but irrelevant, and China is quietly making arrangements to conduct its trade with Europe in yuan rather than dollars.

Strong nations in control of their own destinies, it’s fair to note, don’t respond to challenges on this scale by plunging their heads quite so enthusiastically into the sands of self-deception.

To shift temporal metaphors a bit, the long day of national delusion that dawned back in 1980, when Ronald Reagan famously and fatuously proclaimed “it’s morning in America,” is drawing on rapidly toward dusk, and most Americans are hopelessly unprepared for the coming of night.

They’re unprepared in practical terms, that is, for an era in which the five per cent of us who live in the United States will no longer dispose of a quarter of the world’s energy supply and a third of its raw materials and industrial products, and in which what currently counts as a normal American lifestyle will soon be no more than a fading memory for the vast majority.

They’re just as unprepared, though, for the psychological and emotional costs of that shattering transformation—not least because the change isn’t being imposed on them at random by an indifferent universe, but comes as the inevitable consequence of their own collective choices in decades not that long past.

The hard fact that most people in this country are trying not to remember is this: in the years right after Reagan’s election, a vast number of Americans enthusiastically turned their backs on the promising steps toward sustainability that had been taken in the previous decade, abandoned the ideals they’d been praising to the skies up to that time, and cashed in their grandchildrens’ future so that they didn’t have to give up the extravagance and waste that defined their familiar and comfortable lifestyles.

As a direct result, the nonrenewable resources that might have supported the transition to a sustainable future went instead to fuel one last orgy of wretched excess. Now, though, the party is over, the bill is due, and the consequences of that disastrous decision have become a massive though almost wholly unmentionable factor in our nation’s culture and collective psychology.

A great many of the more disturbing features of contemporary American life, I’m convinced, can’t be understood unless America’s thirty-year vacation from reality is taken into account. A sixth of the US population is currently on antidepressant medications, and since maybe half of Americans can’t afford to get medication at all, the total number of Americans who are clinically depressed is likely a good deal higher than prescription figures suggest.

The sort of bizarre delusions that used to count as evidence of serious mental illness—baroque conspiracy theories thickly frosted with shrill claims of persecution, fantasies of imminent mass death as punishment for humanity’s sins, and so on—have become part of the common currency of American folk belief.

For that matter, what does our pop culture’s frankly necrophiliac obsession with vampires amount to but an attempt, thinly veiled in the most transparent of symbolism, to insist that it really is okay to victimize future generations for centuries down the line in order to prolong one’s own existence?

Mythic and legends such as this can be remarkably subtle barometers of the collective psyche. The transformation that turned the vampire from just another spooky Eastern European folktale into a massive pop culture presence in industrial North America has quite a bit to say about the unspoken ideas and emotions moving through the crawlspaces of our collective life.

In the same way, it’s anything but an accident that the myth of the heroic quest has become so pervasive a presence in the modern industrial world that Joseph Campbell could simply label it “the monomyth,” the basic form of myth as such.

In any sense other than a wholly parochial one, of course, he was quite wrong—the wild diversity of the world’s mythic stories can’t be forced into any one narrative pattern—but if we look only at popular culture in the modern industrial world, he’s almost right.

The story of the callow nobody who answers the call to adventure, goes off into the unknown, accomplishes some grand task, and returns transformed, to transform his surroundings in turn, is firmly welded into place in the imagination of our age.

You’ll find it at the center of J.R.R. Tolkien’s great works of fantasy, in the most forgettable products of the modern entertainment industry, and everything in between and all around.

Yet there’s a curious blind spot in all this: we hear plenty about those who answer the call to adventure, and nothing at all about those who refuse it. Those latter don’t offer much of a plot engine for an adventure story, granted, but such a tale could make for a gripping psychological study—and one that has some uncomfortably familiar features.

With that in mind, with an apology in the direction of Tolkien’s ghost, and with another to those of my readers who aren’t lifelong Tolkien buffs with a head full of Middle-earth trivia—yes, I used to sign school yearbooks in fluent Elvish—

I’d like to suggest a brief visit to an alternate Middle-earth: one in which Frodo Baggins, facing the final crisis of the Third Age and the need to leave behind everything he knew and loved in order to take the Ring to Mount Doom, crumpled instead, with a cry of “I can’t, Gandalf, I just can’t.” Perhaps you’ll join me in a quiet corner of The Green Dragon, the best inn in Bywater, take a mug of ale from the buxom hobbit barmaid, and talk about old Frodo, who lived until recently just up the road and across the bridge in Hobbiton.

You’ve heard about the magic ring he had, the one that he inherited from his uncle Bilbo, the one that Gandalf the wizard wanted him to go off and destroy? That was thirty years ago, and most folk in the Shire have heard rumors about it by now.

Yes, it’s quite true; Frodo was supposed to leave the Shire and go off on an adventure, as Bilbo did before him, and couldn’t bring himself to do it. He had plenty of reasons to stay home, to be sure. He was tolerably well off and quite comfortable, all his friends and connections were here, and the journey would have been difficult and dangerous.

Nor was there any certainty of success—quite the contrary, it’s entirely possible that he might have perished somewhere in the wild lands, or been caught by the Dark Lord’s servants, or what have you.

So he refused, and when Gandalf tried to talk to him about it, he threw the old wizard out of Bag End and slammed the round green door in his face. Have you ever seen someone in a fight who knows that he’s in the wrong, and knows that everyone else knows it, and that knowledge just makes him even more angry and stubborn? That was Frodo just then.

Friends of mine watched the whole thing, or as much of it as could be seen from the garden outside, and it was not a pleasant spectacle.

It’s what happened thereafter, though, that bears recalling. I’m quite sure that if Frodo had shown the least sign of leaving the Shire and going on the quest, Sauron would have sent Black Riders after him in a fine hurry, and there’s no telling what else might have come boiling up out of Mordor.

It’s by no means impossible that the Dark Lord might have panicked, and launched a hasty, ill-advised assault on Gondor right away.

For all I know, that may have been what Gandalf had in mind, tricking the Dark Lord into overreacting before he’d gathered his full strength, and before Gondor and Rohan had been thoroughly weakened from within.

Still, once Sauron’s spies brought him word that Frodo had refused to embark on the quest, the Dark Lord knew that he had a good deal less to fear, and that he could afford to take his time.

Ever since then, there have been plenty of servants of Mordor in and around the Shire, and a Black Rider or two keeping watch nearby, but nothing obvious or direct, nothing that might rouse whatever courage Frodo might have had left or convince him that he had to flee for his life.

Sauron was willing to be patient—patient and cruel. I’m quite sure he knew perfectly well what the rest of Frodo’s life would be like.

So Gandalf went away, and Frodo stayed in Bag End, and for years thereafter it seemed as though the whole business had been no more than a mistake. The news that came up the Greenway from the southern lands was no worse than before; Gondor still stood firm, and though there was said to be some kind of trouble in Rohan, well, that was only to be expected now and then.

Frodo even took to joking about how gullible he’d been to believe all those alarmist claims that Gandalf had made. Sauron was still safely cooped up in Mordor, and all seemed right with Middle-earth.

Of course part of that was simply that Frodo had gotten even wealthier and more comfortable than he’d been before. He patched up his relationship with the Sackville-Bagginses, and he invested a good deal of his money in Sandyman’s mill in Hobbiton, which paid off handsomely.

He no longer spent time with many of his younger friends by then, partly because they had their own opinions about what he should have done, and partly because he had business connections with some of the wealthiest hobbits in the Shire, and wanted to build on those.

He no longer took long walks around the Shire, as he’d done before, and he gave up visiting elves and dwarves when he stopped speaking to Gandalf.

But of course the rumors and news from the southern lands slowly but surely turned to the worse, as the Dark Lord gathered his power and tightened his grip on the western lands a little at a time. I recall when Rohan fell to Saruman’s goblin armies.

That was a shock for a great many folk, here in the Shire and elsewhere. Soon thereafter, though, Frodo was claiming that after all, Saruman wasn’t Sauron, and Rohan wasn’t that important, and for all anyone knew, the wizard and the Dark Lord might well end up at each other’s throats and spare the rest of us.

Still, it was around that time that Frodo stopped joking about Gandalf’s warnings, and got angry if anyone mentioned them in his hearing. It was around that same time, too, that he started insisting loudly and often that someone would surely stop Sauron.

One day it was the elves: after all, they had three rings of power, and could surely overwhelm the forces of Mordor if they chose to. Another day, the dwarves would do it, or Saruman, or the men of Gondor, or the Valar in the uttermost West. There were so many alternatives! His friends very quickly learned to nod and agree with him, for he would lose his temper and start shouting at them if they disagreed or even asked questions.

When Lorien was destroyed, that was another shock. It was after that, as I recall, that Frodo started hinting darkly that the elves didn’t seem to be doing anything with their three rings of power to stop Sauron, and maybe they weren’t as opposed to him as they claimed. He came up with any number of theories about this or that elvish conspiracy.

The first troubles were starting to affect the Shire by then, of course, and his investments were beginning to lose money; it was probably inevitable that he would start claiming that the conspiracy was aimed in part against hobbits, against the Shire, or against him in particular—especially the latter. They wanted his ring, of course. That played a larger and larger role in his talk as the years passed.

I don’t recall hearing of any particular change in his thinking when word came that Minas Tirith had been taken by the Dark Lord’s armies, but it wasn’t much later that a great many elves came hurrying along the East Road through the Shire, and a few months after that, word came that Rivendell had fallen.

That was not merely a shock, but a blow; Frodo had grown up hearing his uncle’s stories about Rivendell and the elves and half-elves who lived there. There was a time after that news came that some of us briefly wondered if old Frodo might actually find it in himself to do the thing he’d refused to do all those years before.

But of course he did nothing of the kind, not even when the troubles here in the Shire began to bite more and more deeply, when goblins started raiding the borders of the North Farthing and the Buckland had to be abandoned to the Old Forest. No, he started insisting to anyone who would listen that Middle-earth was doomed, that there was no hope left in elves or dying Númenor, that Sauron’s final victory would surely come before—oh, I forget what the date was; it was some year or other not too far from now.

He spent hours reading through books of lore, making long lists of reasons why the Dark Lord’s triumph was surely at hand. Why did he do that? Why, for the same reason that drove him to each of his other excuses in turn: to prove to himself that his decision to refuse the quest hadn’t been the terrible mistake he knew perfectly well it had been.

And then, of course, the Ring betrayed him, as it betrayed Gollum and Isildur before him. He came home late at night, after drinking himself half under the table at the Ivy Bush, and discovered that the Ring was nowhere to be found.

After searching Bag End in a frantic state, he ran out the door and down the road toward Bywater shouting “My precious! My precious!” He was weeping and running blindly in the night, and when he got to the bridge he stumbled; over he went into the water, and that was the end of him. They found his body in a weir downstream the next morning.

The worst of it is that right up to the end, right up to the hour the Ring left him, he still could have embarked on the quest. It would have been a different journey, and quite possibly a harder one. With Rivendell gone, he would have had to go west rather than east, across the Far Downs to Cirdan at the Grey Havens, where you’ll find most of the high-elves who still remain in Middle-earth.

From there, with such companions as might have joined him, he would have had to go north and then eastward through Arnor, past the ruins of Annuminas and Lake Evendim, to the dales of the Misty Mountains, and then across by one of the northern passes: a hard and risky journey, but by no means impossible, for with no more need to hinder travel between Rivendell and Lorien, the Dark Lord’s watch on the mountains has grown slack.

Beyond the mountains, the wood-elves still dwell in the northern reaches of Mirkwood, along with refugees from Lorien and the last of the Beornings. He could have gotten shelter and help there, and boats to travel down the River Running into the heart of Wilderland. From there his way would have led by foot to the poorly guarded northern borders of Mordor—when has Sauron ever had to face a threat from that quarter?

So you see that it could have been done. It could still be done, if someone were willing to do it. Even though so much of what could have been saved thirty years ago has been lost, even though Minas Tirith, Edoras, Lorien and Rivendell have fallen and the line of the kings of Gondor is no more, it would still be worth doing; there would still be many things that could be saved.

Nor would such a journey have to be made alone. Though Aragorn son of Arathorn was slain in the last defense of Rivendell, there are still Rangers to be found in Cirdan’s realm and the old lands of Arnor; there are elf-warriors who hope to avenge the blood shed at Rivendell, and dwarves from the Blue Mountains who have their own ancient grudges against the Dark Lord.

The last free Rohirrim retreated to Minhiriath after Éomer fell at Helm’s Deep, and still war against King Grima, while Gondor west of the river Gilrain clings to a tenuous independence and would rise up against Sauron at need. Would those and the elves of Lindon be enough? No one can say; there are no certainties in this business, except for the one Frodo chose—the certainty that doing nothing will guarantee Sauron’s victory.

And there might even still be a wizard to join such a quest. In fact, there would certainly be one—the very last of them, as far as I know. Gandalf perished when Lorien fell, I am sorry to say, and as for Saruman, the last anyone saw of him, he was screaming in terror as two Ringwraiths dragged him through the door of the Dark Tower; his double-dealing was never likely to bring him to a good end.

The chief of the Ringwraiths rules in Isengard now. Still, there was a third in these western lands: fool and bird-tamer, Saruman called him, having never quite managed to notice that knowledge of the ways of nature and the friendship of birds and beasts might have considerable value in the last need of Middle-earth. Radagast is his name; yes, that would be me.

Why am I telling you all this? Well, you are old Frodo’s youngest cousin, are you not? Very nearly the only one of his relatives with enough of the wild Tookish blood in you to matter, or so I am told. It was just a month ago that you and two of your friends were walking in the woods, and you spoke with quite a bit of anger about how the older generation of hobbits had decided to huddle in their holes until the darkness falls—those were your very words, I believe.

How did I know that? Why, a little bird told me—a wren, to be precise, a very clever and helpful little fellow, who runs errands for me from time to time when I visit this part of Middle-earth. If you meant what you said then, there is still hope.

And the Ring? No, it was not lost, or not for long. It slipped from its chain and fell from old Frodo’s pocket as he stumbled home that last night, and a field mouse spotted it. I had briefed all the animals and birds around Hobbiton, of course, and so she knew what to do; she dragged the Ring into thick grass, and when dawn came, caught the attention of a jay, who took it and hid it high up in a tree. I had to trade quite a collection of sparkling things for it!

But here it is, in this envelope, waiting for someone to take up the quest that Frodo refused.

The choice is yours, my dear hobbit. What will you do?

.

Solar Impulse crosses USA

SUBHEAD: Flying coast-to-coast has always been a mythical milestone full of challenges for aviation pioneers.

By John Upton on 8 July 2013 for Grist Magazine -
(http://grist.org/news/solar-plane-completes-cross-country-trip-despite-torn-wing/)


Image above: Solar impulse over American city. From (http://grist.org/slideshow/solar-impulses-u-s-adventures-in-photos/).

You know a plane is hot when wing damage actually hastens its arrival.
That happened Saturday night, when the solar-powered Solar Impulse completed a historic stop-and-start transcontinental voyage across America that began May 3 in San Francisco.
  • Total flying time: 105 hours and 41 minutes
  • Distance flown: 3,511 miles
  • Average speed: 33 miles per hour
  • Gasoline consumed: 0 drops
From Reuters:
The Solar Impulse, its four propellers driven by energy collected from 12,000 solar cells in its wings to charge batteries for night use, landed at John F. Kennedy Airport at 11:09 p.m. EDT, organizers said.
The experimental aircraft had left Dulles International Airport outside Washington for its last leg more than 18 hours earlier, on a route that took it north over Maryland, Delaware and New Jersey.

The spindly aircraft had been expected to land in the early hours of Sunday, but the project team decided to shorten the flight after an 8-foot (2.5 meter) tear appeared on the underside of the left wing.
The wing damage forced organizers to cancel a planned Statue of Liberty flyover, but it wasn’t enough to prevent them from achieving their dream of coast-to-coast solar-powered flight.
Between San Francisco and New York, the plane stopped over at Phoenix, Dallas-Fort Worth, St. Louis, Cincinnati, and Washington D.C., holding public events and meeting public officials.
 
“Flying coast-to-coast has always been a mythical milestone full of challenges for aviation pioneers,” Solar Impulse copilot and chairman Bertrand Piccard said. “During this journey, we had to find solutions for a lot of unforeseen situations, which obliged us to develop new skills and strategies. In doing so, we also pushed the boundaries of clean technologies and renewable energies to unprecedented levels.”

See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: Solar plane to cross America 5/23/13

And read more about the Solar Impulse: Solar plane crosses U.S., injects sexiness into the green conversation

.

Film Festival in Waimea

SOURCE: Jonathan Jay (jjkauai@gmail.com)
SUBHEAD: Wild & Scenic Film Festival will benefit Hawaii's statewide land trust. "Protecting the Lands that Sustain Us".

By Jennifer Luck on 28 March 2013 in Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2013/03/film-festival-in-waimea.html)


Image above: Detail of poster for Wild & Scenic Film Festival to be held at Waimea Theater. From HILT.

Mark your calendars to join Hawaiian Islands Land Trust (HILT) as we host the Wild & Scenic Film Festival on April 6 & 7 at the historic Waimea Theater. We are pleased to present this premiere travelling environmental and adventure film festival featuring award- winning films about nature, community activism, adventure, conservation, water, energy, wildlife, environmental justice, agriculture, and indigenous cultures.

The Wild & Scenic Film Festival is a collection of films from the annual festival held the third week of January in Nevada City, CA. Now in its 11th year Wild & Scenic focuses on films that speak to the environmental concerns and celebrations of our planet. “Films featured at Wild & Scenic give people a sense of place,” says Tour Manager, Lori Van Laanen. “In our busy lives, it’s easy to get disconnected from our role in the global ecosystem. When we realize that the change we need in this world begins with us we can start making a difference. Come watch and see!”

This year’s selections in Waimea combine stellar filmmaking, beautiful cinematography, and first-rate storytelling to inform, inspire and ignite solutions for the environmental challenges that confront us locally (Saturday’s theme) and globally (Sunday’s theme).

The historic Waimea Theater serves as a backdrop for our cinematic journey into a deep appreciation and a sense of wonder for the natural world that surrounds and supports us. The festival is a natural extension of Hawaiian Islands Land Trust’s work to inspire people to act on behalf of the environment. BEsides movies there will be food, and door prizes.

Hawaiian Islands Land Trust is a statewide conservation organization, our mission is to protect the lands that sustain us for current and future generations through conservation of lands providing recreation and access to recreation, culturally significant lands, working farms and ranches, view planes and corridors, and habitat for native plants and animals.

Our mission ties in seamlessly to the Wild & Scenic Film Festival’s call to action to inspire people and unite communities to heal the earth. To find out more about our organization, please visit our website at www.hilt.org.

Mahalo to our local sponsors Aston Waimea Plantation Cottages and Blue Hawaiian Helicopters and for the support of the Wild & Scenic Film Festival National Partners: Patagonia, CLIF Bar, Sierra Nevada Brewing and Mother Jones.

WHAT:
 The Wild & Scenic Film Festival

WHEN:
April 6th & 7th
Theater opens at 4:00pm. Movies start a 5:00pm. 

WHERE:
Waimea Movie Theater
Kamohoalii Highway
Waimea, Kauai, Hawaii

COST:
$15 each night. $20 for both nights.
Buy tickets at HILT website or at Waimea Theater.

CONTACT:
Jennifer Luck Kauai Island Director
jennifer@hilt.org

Hawaiian Islands Land Trust
www.hilt.org

Kauai Office: P.O. Box 562 Kilauea, HI 96754
phone: 808-755-5707

Main Office: P.O. Box 965, Wailuku, HI 96793
phone: 808-244-5263




.

Resilience and our children

SUBHEAD: For too many children, life is a series of dulled experiences that have had the life and risk sucked right out of them.

By Annie Lussenburg on 20 November 2012 for Resilience.org -
(http://www.resilience.org/stories/2012-11-15/resilience-why-so-many-parents-today-are-getting-it-wrong)


Image above: Still photo of a scene from 1983 movie "A Christmas Story". In the 1940's just going to school each day was an adventure. From (http://blog.moviefone.com/2010/12/14/a-christmas-story-where-are-they-now/).

I’ve lost count of the number of articles I’ve read about the importance of developing resilience.  It’s mentioned all over the web and for good reason, as it's a critical coping mechanism.  Most of those articles however, are directed at developing resilience within the adult population.  Seldom do we talk about how parents can and should create resilience in children, particularly when there are many parents out there who are doing the exact opposite of what’s required. 

Now before I go further, there are many situations where children are having to learn the hard realities of life far more quickly than either they, or their parents, or anyone else for that matter, might like.  That’s of course, directly due to the economic reality in many parts of the United States and Europe.

Up here however, in Canada and in the more wealthy parts of the US, parents are often unknowingly destroying their child’s ability to develop resilience, simply because most people have no idea of how inner resilience really develops.

Is it learned?  Is it something you can teach?  Can you sit with your children pointing to a book and explain ‘resilience’ as if it was like learning to use the potty or teaching your child how to share with friends?  Does it come from trying to learn a skill over and over again until they can do it in their sleep?

No, it doesn’t come from any of those.  Resilience is not a skill in the traditional sense.  It’s an integral part of being.  It results from how you are brought up and the more you are exposed to situations that produce it, the more you will develop.  Yes, you can improve your inner resilience but it comes from experience and only experience can teach it.

Isn’t it ironic then, that just at the time when we need our children to develop resilience the most, all the experiences that produce it are coming under assault?

So what are those assaults and how are they impacting our developing children in a way that might ultimately affect our very ability to survive as a species?  Well the assaults come under names that we might not even recognize.  Try ‘Self esteem’ and ‘Safety’ and all the words out there that are designed to make us feel good without doing anything remotely out of our comfort zone.

You see, resilience comes out of a struggle.  That’s it, there’s no other way to get it. Take the wrong bus and end up at the wrong stop will build you resilience but only if you aren’t able to place a rescue call for someone to pick you up.  Failing math and having to try harder: There’s a good one.  Having to go to another soccer game and try again because the last time you mucked up and everyone is mad at you.  Realizing that a course or activity you thought you'd enjoy is just terrible but sticking with it anyway, even though you're sometimes miserable.

All the things that we generally think of as negative experiences to be shied away from, are actually integral to being able to actively navigate the world as the adult and deal with the bumps of life.  And that is the world as it is now, not the potentially more difficult one on the horizon.

And just as the world is getting harder with austerity measures becoming de rigueur and overwhelmed budgets, we’re parenting children in a way that ensures children will have a harder and harder time navigating that future.  All the experiences that create resilience are being wiped away.

And it starts so young. Take the wonderful toys on display this Christmas and look at how they offer us a stunning example.  There’s the Fisher Price ‘Smart Cycle.’  Get all the experience of riding your bike without the experience!  No wind in your hair.  No thrill of taking the corner too fast.  No wobble when you move the handlebars too severely.  No need for all those worries when your bike is firmly hooked up to the TV.   Same for the Fisher Price “Fun 2 Learn Smart Fit Park.”  Who knew you didn’t have to go outside and get a tad bit frosty to have some fun this winter?

Safe, secure and coddled might sound good but it denies children the very coping mechanisms that will make the difference to them as adults.

Babies are coddled and carried about long after they actively outgrow their bounds and want to explore.  Moms and dads come running the moment they squawk because they’ve been brainwashed to believe that meeting their children’s needs means never allowing the minimum of discomfort to develop.

Yet it’s that momentary discomfort and struggle that leads to real resilience and ironically, even pleasure.  In ‘Satisfaction: The Science of Finding True Fulfillment*,’ Dr Gregory Berns explains that satisfaction is more about the struggle than the achievement itself. In other words, it’s more about the journey and not the arrival.  The human brain needs new experiences that are challenging.

How many times have you heard that children should not be allowed to talk to strangers even though the librarian is a stranger, as is the bus driver?  How many children are not allowed to play at the playground without mom or dad in tow, following along behind?  How many young children are not allowed to navigate the yard alone?  Even the older ones are frequently not allowed on a city bus or not allowed to walk to soccer practice.

For far too many children these days, life is a series of dulled experiences.  Experiences that have literally had the very life and inherent risk sucked right out of them.

So for all those children whose real experiences are reduced to an empty shell, I implore parents to understand their children’s real needs and take on board the real importance of struggle.  Try to resist stepping in to sweep away all your children’s problems as you’re simply not doing them any favours in the long run.

Children, especially little ones, will look to you to see how you deal with things that affect them.  Show fear of the world and they will too. Show undue upset at a minor bonk on their head or the fact that their friend has suddenly ditched them to play with someone else is, to give them the idea that such setbacks are overwhelming and deserve great attention, dissection and angst.  By all means discuss what happened but do so in a way, that allows them to develop resilience in the face of a negative event and that’s by not focussing on it or giving it undue attention.

The best way to discuss an event without giving it that undue attention, is to open the natural doors of communication and talk about it whilst focused on something else.  Try sorting the laundry basket together or sweeping the floor.  Talking to your children whilst engaged in another task is the way parents have offered support to their children for millennia.

Ask yourself why it’s so much easier for people to talk to teenagers in the car?   It’s because you’re focused on the act of driving and that’s far less intimidating to anyone who wants to open up about something bothering them.  To chat whilst doing something alongside your child, is to create an environment that transcends minor difficulties and offers support in a natural way that helps children learn to bounce back from disappointments.

My father used to have a saying.  "All of us will, at one point or other go in to the jungle." It's a period of difficulty that often defines life.  Some of us unfortunately get lost and fail to make it out at all.  Some will come out on their hands and knees and some will come out with the monkeys carrying the coconuts.  Whatever you do and however much you protect your child, they will at one point, enter that jungle. Let’s give them the skills to at least come out, coconuts notwithstanding.

*Satisfaction:  The Science of Finding True Fulfillment. New York, USA: Henry Holt & Company.  Chapter 7.

.

Legend of Leatherman

SUBHEAD: In the 19th century, a strange person known as the Leatherman wandered endlessly through the Hudson Valley and Connecticut.

 [IB Editor's note: The Old Leatherman was a legend. Today he'd be classified a schizoid transient in need of medication. So goes the adventure of life in America.]

By Craig LeMoult on 25 May 2011 for NPR and WSHU - 
(http://www.npr.org/2011/05/26/136649653/leatherman-remains-a-mystery-even-in-death)

 
Image above: Detail of 1888 photo of Old Leatherman. From (http://www.hvmag.com/Hudson-Valley-Magazine/April-2010/Legend-in-Leather/).

In the 1800s, a man wearing a head-to-toe leather suit walked a 365-mile circuit between the Connecticut and Hudson rivers, sleeping in cave shelters and completing his journey in precisely 34 days. And he kept it up for years.

No one knows who he was or why he did what he did, but the legend of the Old Leatherman still fascinates. This week, archaeologists and historians set out to solve the mystery by exhuming his body. But their efforts have only deepened the mystery.  

Taking A 365-Mile Walk
In the woods off an old dirt road in Ossining, N.Y., a large rock face looms, with some smaller jagged boulders at its base. "Here we are. This is actually where the Leatherman stayed," says author Dan DeLuca, who wrote a book about the iconic traveler. DeLuca climbs down into what looks more like a crevice than a cave.

More than 100 years ago, this spot was one of the homes of the Old Leatherman. "He was all dressed in leather," DeLuca says, "made from old boot tops that he sewed together with leather lace."

That "boot suit" weighed 60 pounds, and he wore it even in the hottest days of summer. The Leatherman started walking clockwise in a huge circle between the Connecticut and Hudson rivers. And he completed that circuit every 34 days. The Old Leatherman was so punctual that people could tell the time by his schedule. "If normally he would stop at your house at 10, he would be there around 10, give or take 5 to 10 minutes," DeLuca says.  

An Unlikely Celebrity
The Leatherman slept in caves and other shelters, where he tended gardens and stored food. He walked through more than 40 towns on his route. But he didn't speak much — just the occasional grunt of some fractured English, and sometimes a phrase in French, believed to be his native language.

People began offering the Leatherman food, considering it an honor if he stopped at their home. Some schools let the best student go outside to give him food when he passed by on "Leatherman Day." But no one ever knew who he was, or why he lived like this. It's a mystery that DeLuca has been studying for more than 20 years.

He started his research after a heart transplant forced him to retire. "A lot of people, when they get a heart transplant, don't make it. They pass away," he says. "And I think the old Leatherman has kept me alive." DeLuca is not the only one inspired by the legend. The band Pearl Jam recorded a song about him.

And there's a race in Pound Ridge, N.Y., named after him. His caves are visited by Leatherman enthusiasts, as is his grave, in Ossining, N.Y. A plaque on the headstone has the name "Jules Bourglay." There was a legend that a Frenchman by that name lost the chance to marry his true love after he blew a fortune in the leather business, and wandered Connecticut and New York in a leather suit as a penance. Of course, DeLuca looked into that one. "A great story," he says. "Not true, though."

 Seeing A Chance For Answers
The grave site is situated right next to a highway; so many people visit it that concerns arose that someone could get hurt. So the local historical society decided to dig up the Old Leatherman. The plan was to move him to a more central place in the graveyard, and give him a new stone without the false name.

The historians thought that while they were at it, they could also take the opportunity to do forensic tests on the remains, to check some of the theories about the Leatherman. For instance, tests might help determine whether he had Native American roots. And it's not known whether he was from France or America. The plan to take the DNA became a bit of a controversy. Don Johnson is a middle school history teacher in North Haven, Conn., who teaches his students about the Leatherman. He is also the creator of the website Leave the Leatherman Alone. Johnson says the Leatherman was intensely private, spending "30 years, 100,000 miles, never telling anybody who he was.

That legacy to me should speak to us today as, do we want to respect him and memorialize him properly? Then leave him alone. Leave his bones alone." Despite those misgivings, archaeologists, soil scientists and amateur historians filled a tent erected over the grave site this week. As they dug, the scene was one of excitement — somewhere between a scene from the TV show CSI and a circus tent. Connecticut state archaeologist Nick Bellantoni lay on the gravesite, carefully scraping at it with a small tool. He found some nails, and a few animal bones.

But that's it — there was no trace of the Leatherman. Now it seems that the mystery of the Leatherman has deepened — from people not knowing who he was to not knowing where he is. "Yeah ... he's having a good laugh," Bellantoni says. They held a funeral for the Old Leatherman on Wednesday afternoon and reburied some of the dirt where they believe he decomposed. The Old Leatherman died more than 120 years ago, but the mystery surrounding his legend is now stronger than ever.

 .

Amelia Earhart's Fate?

SUBHEAD: DNA testing on recent bone discovery may confirm suspected fate on Nikumaroro Island, about 1,800 miles south of Hawaii.

 By Sean Murphy on 18 December 2010 for Huffington Post - 
  (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/18/amelia-earhart-bones-island_n_798607.html)

 
Image above: Amelia and Noonan on their stopover in Brazil on round the world attempt. From (http://library.pittstate.edu/AxeBLOG/amelia%20earhart%20brazil.jpg).

The three bone fragments turned up on a deserted South Pacific island that lay along the course Amelia Earhart was following when she vanished. Nearby were several tantalizing artifacts: some old makeup, some glass bottles and shells that had been cut open.

Now scientists at the University of Oklahoma hope to extract DNA from the tiny bone chips in tests that could prove Earhart died as a castaway after failing in her 1937 quest to become the first woman to fly around the world.

"There's no guarantee," said Ric Gillespie, director of the International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery, a group of aviation enthusiasts in Delaware that found the pieces of bone this year while on an expedition to Nikumaroro Island, about 1,800 miles south of Hawaii.

"You only have to say you have a bone that may be human and may be linked to Earhart and people get excited. But it is true that, if they can get DNA, and if they can match it to Amelia Earhart's DNA, that's pretty good."

It could be months before scientists know for sure – and it could turn out the bones are from a turtle. The fragments were found near a hollowed-out turtle shell that might have been used to collect rain water, but there were no other turtle parts nearby.

Earhart's disappearance on July 2, 1937, remains one of the 20th century's most enduring mysteries. Did she run out of fuel and crash at sea? Did her Lockheed Electra develop engine trouble? Did she spot the island from the sky and attempt to land on a nearby reef?

"What were her last moments like? What was she doing? What happened?" asked Robin Jensen, an associate professor of communications at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind., who has studied Earhart's writings and speeches.

Since 1989, Gillespie's group has made 10 trips to the island, trying each time to find clues that might help determine the fate of Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan.

Last spring, volunteers working at what seemed to be an abandoned campsite found one piece of bone that appeared to be from a neck and another unknown fragment dissimilar to bird or fish bones. A third fragment might be from a finger. The largest of the pieces is just over an inch long.

The area was near a site where native work crews found skeletal remains in 1940. Bird and fish carcasses suggested Westerners had prepared meals there.

"This site tells the story of how someone or some people attempted to live as castaways," Gillespie said Friday in an interview with The Associated Press. "These fish weren't eaten like Pacific Islanders" eat fish.

Millions of dollars have been spent in failed attempts to learn what happened to Earhart, a Kansas native declared dead by a California court in early 1939.

The official version says Earhart and Noonan ran out of fuel and crashed at sea while flying from Lae, New Guinea, to Howland Island, which had a landing strip and fuel.

Gillespie's book "Finding Amelia: The True Story of the Earhart Disappearance," and "Amelia Earhart's Shoes," written by four volunteers from the aircraft group, suggest the pair landed on the reef and survived, perhaps for months, on scant food and rainwater.

Gillespie, a pilot, said the aviator would have needed only about 700 feet of unobstructed space to land because her plane would have been traveling only about 55 mph at touchdown.

"It looks like she could have landed successfully on the reef surrounding the island. It's very flat and smooth," Gillespie said. "At low tide, it looks like this place is surrounded by a parking lot."

However, Gillespie said, the plane, even if it landed safely, would have been slowly dragged into the sea by the tides. The waters off the reef are 1,000 to 2,000 feet deep. His group needs $3 million to $5 million for a deep-sea dive.

The island is on the course Earhart planned to follow from Lae, New Guinea, to Howland Island, which had a landing strip and fuel. Over the last seven decades, searches of the remote atoll have been inconclusive.

After the latest find, anthropologists who had previously worked with Gillespie's group suggested that he send the bones to the University of Oklahoma's Molecular Anthropology Laboratory, which has experience extracting genetic material from old bones. Gillespie's group also has a genetic sample from an Earhart female relative for comparison with the bones.

The lab is looking for mitochondrial DNA, which is passed along only through females, so there is no need to have a Noonan sample.
Cecil Lewis, an assistant professor of anthropology at the lab, said the university received a little more than a gram of bone fragments about two weeks ago. If researchers are able to extract DNA and link it to Earhart, a sample would be sent to another lab for verification.

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. That's why we're trying to downplay a lot of the media attention right now," Lewis said. "For all we know, this is just a turtle bone, and a lot of people are going to be very disheartened."

Under the best circumstances, the analysis would take two weeks. If scientists have trouble with the sample, that time frame could stretch into months, Lewis said.

"Ancient DNA is incredibly unpredictable," he said.

Other material recovered this year also suggested the presence of Westerners at the isolated island site:
  • Someone carried shells ashore before cutting them open and slicing out the meat. Islanders cut the meat out at sea.
  • Bottles found nearby were melted on the bottom, suggesting they had been put into a fire, possibly to boil water. (A Coast Guard unit on the island during World War II would have had no need to boil water.)
  • Bits of makeup were found. The group is checking to see which products Earhart endorsed and whether an inventory lists specific types of makeup carried on her final trip.
  • A glass bottle with remnants of lanolin and oil, possibly hand lotion.
In 2007, the group found a piece of a pocket knife but didn't know whether it was left by the Coast Guard or castaways. This year, it found the shattered remains of the knife, suggesting someone had smashed it to extract the blades. Gillespie speculated a castaway used a blade to make a spear to stab shallow-water fish like those found at the campsite.

Following Earhart's disappearance, distress signals picked up by distant ships pointed back to the area of Nikumaroro Island, but while pilots passing over saw signs of recent habitation, the island was crossed off the list as having been searched, Gillespie said.

In 1940, a British overseer on the island recovered a partial human skeleton, a woman's shoe and an empty sextant box at what appeared to be a former campsite, littered with turtle, clamshell and bird remains.

Thinking of Earhart, the overseer sent the items to Fiji, where a British doctor decided they belonged to a stocky European or mixed-blood male, ruling out any Earhart connection.

The bones later vanished, but in 1998, Gillespie's group located the doctor's notes in London. Two other forensic specialists reviewed the doctor's bone measurements and agreed they were more "consistent with" a female of northern European descent, about Earhart's age and height.

On their own visits to the island, volunteers recovered an aluminum panel that could be from an Electra, another piece of a woman's shoe and a "cat's paw" heel dating from the 1930s; another shoe heel, possibly a man's, and an oddly cut piece of clear Plexiglas.

The sextant box might have been Noonan's. The woman's shoe and heel resemble a blucher-style oxford seen in a pre-takeoff photo of Earhart. The plastic shard is the exact thickness and curvature of an Electra's side window.

The body of evidence is intriguing, but Gillespie insists the team is "constantly agonizing over whether we are being dragged down a path that isn't right."


.