Texas, God & Climate Change

SUBHEAD: Representative Joe Barton cites biblical flood to disprove human role in climate change.

By Chelsea Kiene on 11 October 2013 for Huffington Post -

Image above: Photo of Joe Barton and painting of great flood. Unknown source.

Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) turned to the Bible on Wednesday during a congressional hearing, using the Great Flood to support his claim that climate change isn't man-made, BuzzFeed Politics reported.

During his remarks on H.R. 3, a bill that would grant Congress the authority to circumvent President Barack Obama and approve the Keystone XL pipeline, Barton acknowledged the existence of climate change, but argued that it is steered by natural causes.

"I would point out that people like me who support hydrocarbon development don't deny that climate is changing," Barton told his fellow members of a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee. "I think you can have an honest difference of opinion of what's causing that change without automatically being either all in that's all because of mankind or it's all just natural. I think there's a divergence of evidence."

"I would point out that if you're a believer in the Bible, one would have to say the Great Flood is an example of climate change and that certainly wasn't because mankind had overdeveloped hydrocarbon energy," Barton added.

A former chairman of the full House Energy and Commerce Committee and a leading Republican voice on energy policy, Barton has expressed skepticism about man-made global warming in the past. In 2009, he tried to argue that carbon emissions are harmless to the environment, noting how prevalent carbon dioxide is in everyday life.

"CO2 is not a pollutant in any normal definition of the term," Barton said in an interview on C-SPAN.

"It's in your Coca-Cola, your Dr. Pepper and your Perrier water. It's necessary for human life," he continued. "It's odorless, colorless, tasteless, doesn't cause cancer, doesn't cause asthma."

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, CO2 accounted for roughly 84 percent of all human-caused greenhouse gas emissions in the United States during 2010.

In a New York Times op-ed last year, NASA scientist James Hansen warned that allowing the Keystone XL pipeline project to move forward would be "game over for the climate."

"The global warming signal is now louder than the noise of random weather," Hansen wrote. "Extremely hot summers have increased noticeably. We can say with high confidence that the recent heat waves in Texas and Russia, and the one in Europe in 2003, which killed tens of thousands, were not natural events -- they were caused by human-induced climate change."

"We need to start reducing emissions significantly, not create new ways to increase them," Hansen continued. "The science of the situation is clear -- it’s time for the politics to follow."

But Barton is a longtime skeptic of human involvement in climate change, previously asserting that the relevant science is "not settled" and that it's even "going the other way."

Barton -- who acknowledged Wednesday that he's "a proponent and supporter of the Keystone pipeline" -- has also been an outspoken critic of the Obama administration's delay on Keystone XL, calling the president's decision to postpone a decision "bullsh**."

In March, the State Department held the oil pipeline project to be "environmentally sound," a move that outraged many environmentalists. However, the department made no recommendations on whether Obama should proceed with it.

No comments :

Post a Comment