Stroke of Insight

SUBHEAD: Does our planet need a stroke of insight? Overall, I am encouraged by where we are, and the direction we are heading.

By Jill Bolte Taylor on 4 January 2013 for Huffington Post -

Image above: Jill Bolte Taylor demonstrating the natural division in the human brain from video below.

Before 2008, everything I did had something to do with mental health. I'm a neuroscientist, and I was all about understanding how we create our perception of reality, and understanding what's going on in the brains of people who experience hallucination and delusion.

But then I gave a TEDTalk about my own experience with stroke. Within weeks of delivering that talk in 2008, my life changed and the repercussions still resonate loudly in my world. My book, My Stroke of Insight, has been translated into 30 languages. Time and Oprah's Soul Series came calling. I've traveled to Europe, Asia, South America, Canada; I've criss-crossed the states. And in February 2012, I took a trip to Antarctica with Vice President Al Gore, 20 scientists, and 125 global leaders who care deeply about climate.

While I was traveling the globe, I still thought my core issue was mental health. But, perhaps spurred by that trip to Antarctica, I've come to understand that the two issues of mental health and global health are closely linked -- if not one and the same. Similar processes we use to improve our mental health can help us make better, more responsible decisions as a society -- by focusing on the compassion and integrity of our right brain, rather than the judgment, punishment and deception of our left brain.

To use a powerful metaphor, we have two magnificent information-processing machines inside our heads. Our right mind focuses on our similarities, the present moment, inflection of voice, and the bigger picture of how we are all connected. Because it focuses on our similarities, in my mind she is compassionate, expansive, open, and supportive of others.

Juxtaposed to that, our left brain thinks linearly, creates and understands language, defines the boundaries of where we begin and where we end, judges what is right and wrong and is a master of details, details and more details about those details.

Because it focuses on our differences and specializes in critical judgment of those unlike ourselves, our left brain character tends to be our source of bigotry, prejudice, and fear or hate of the unfamiliar.

What this means is that the mean little voice inside my head, the one that is critical of self or others and judges everyone and everything in a negative way, is a part of my neurocircuitry. The question is, what say do I have in who and how I want to be in the world. Do I have the power to choose being kind over being judgmental?

Do we have the power to be open rather than based in our fear? Of course we do, and the better we understand the choices we have been making, either consciously or unconsciously, the more say we will have in the world we create. Neurocircuitry may be neurocircuitry, but we don't have to run on automatic.

We are an amazing species living in an amazing time. We know more about the human brain and how it works than we ever have before, and for the first time in the history of mankind, we have the ability to consciously direct our own evolution. We know we have the ability to not only experience our biological circuitry, but to observe it, nurture it, and change it.

We have the ability to consciously choose who and how we want to be in the world, and we are teaching our children skills about mindfulness, reflection, the value of introversion, vulnerability, and how to respect the environment.

At the same time our world has become extremely polarized, not only in our politics, but hate crimes abound; war is ongoing between those who look different, those who believe differently or even those who are different genders. By better understanding what's going on in our brains, we can better understand all of this behavior and what choices we want to make.

I trust we can create an age where we stop relating to the world skewed through our left-brain values as individuals focused on profit, personal gain, power, prestige, authority, advantage, and the material goods money can buy. Instead, it's time to shift our approach to the planet and our relationship to it, as we explore the most important question of our time: How do we each, as individuals of a collective whole called humanity, bring our gifts to the table to be a part of the solution?

The reality of global warming is no longer an issue for debate. The real conversation now revolves around this question: How are we going to manage the repercussions of our actions , and do it quickly enough to sustain life as we have known it? Needless to say, this is not the way our society works now, and as a result, the health and well-being of our planet has not only been threatened but compromised.

I am a true believer that the next step in our human evolution is upon us, and we are becoming more balanced in not only how we live inside our own heads but in how we treat our planet. When we live our lives through the intention of our right minds, and use the skill sets of both minds to achieve our goals, we become a whole-brained and more balanced society.

Change is never easy, and there will always be those who fall behind. But overall, I am encouraged by where we are, and the direction we are heading.

Video above: TED talk by Jill Bolte Taylor. From (


1 comment :

  1. She says: "Do we have the power to be open rather than based in our fear? Of course we do, and the better we understand the choices we have been making, either consciously or unconsciously, the more say we will have in the world we create."

    Unfortunately the corporations and the media bosses have even a higher power - the power of immobilizing our power to become open, because they rather keep the masses in fear. It is much easier to manipulate people in fear than those who open their mouth.Imagine a large crowd of 200,000 people in a field who are there, but don't know why; they are there and although they have the feeling that something is wrong, they don't know what their next move should be. But there are a few of them who are immune of the debilitating media injections inducing fear, and these few start to speak up giving ideas AND HOPE to the crowd in fear, the fearmongerers use every possible power and money to silence them (see Martin Luther King, Malcolm X etc.) and to discredit them. But most importantly this 200,000 people strong crowd is not likely to gather in any field in the U.S.A. and other countries calling themselves civilized, because the forces behind the fearmongering actions have created convenient tools like Facebook, Twitter and other social media that transformed the thinking of the modern society leading them to believe that an on-line petition with 1 million click-on signatures is more effective and faster than to get 200,000 people together in one field. The left brain is immobilized, hopefully only temporarily. What's the proof? Put yourself in the shoes of the fearmongerer. What would be your first thought if you had 200,000 people in front of your doorstep? That one word from a charismatic speaker and they can destroy your house and yourself in the next minute. And what would be your first thought if you received a protest in your office via e-mail with 1,000.000 clickon-signatures? Oh, it will take a month till a fragment of the signers get together in front of my house and by then I can distract them: I can get more government (from the one that is my culprit) protection; I can order some drones and have them ready if too many people happen to come. But there is even a simpler way, namely to create another distraction that keeps them glued to their computers even if they are drafting the next protest.

    So, the idea is wonderful, but without taking the power out of the hands of corporations and media bosses, its implementation will remain remote and a dream.

    Me ke aloha pumehana.