Inside Kauai's local food movement

SUBHEAD: The issue of local food is more urgent when you're 2,400 miles from the nearest continent.

By James Trimarco on 23 January 2014 for Yes Magazine -
(http://www.yesmagazine.org/planet/paradise-farmed-inside-kaua-i-s-local-food-movement)


Image above: Painting of "Grandma's Taro" by Pachi Longstretch. From (http://www.pachilongstreth.com/Photo_Gallery.html).

With its rippling green cliffs, majestic canyons, and seaside villages, the beauty of Kaua'i is legendary. Yet most of the roughly one million visitors who travel to this Hawaiian island each year don't realize that Kaua'i grows only a small fraction of the food that's eaten here.

About 90 percent is imported from faraway places like the U.S. mainland and Asia. That makes islanders vulnerable to spikes in the prices of food and fuel, as well as to natural disasters that affect barge traffic across the Pacific.

"I've seen occasions where a bridge will get knocked out and then everybody clears the shelves at the grocery store of all the food," says Keone Kealoha, the executive director of Malama Kaua'i, a nonprofit organization that focuses on local food. "It's not like we're cut off from anywhere, it's just the bridge is cut out. But people lose their minds because they don't know how to grow food."

With a climate that permits year-round abundance and a long history of vibrant and diverse local agriculture and fisheries, how did Kaua'i find itself so dependent on imported food? And more importantly, for leaders of a fast-growing food movement, how can local foods once again provide the security and nourishment that was once part of Kauai's way of life?

Local food advocates have spent decades trying to answer those questions and laying down the foundations for a new system of agriculture capable of feeding the island's people. Part of what motivates them is Kaua'i's remoteness. Like the other Hawaiian islands, it is more than 2,400 miles away from the nearest continent. Even the rest of Hawai'i is far away; a stormy channel 70 miles wide separates Kaua'i from the closest major island.

This means that local food is an urgent issue here and advocates hope their work will help prepare local people in the event that the global shipping networks that supply the island with food are ever interrupted.

"If things go in a bad direction," he says, "my hope is that we would see more people locking their arms rather than people locking their doors."

But this is about more than just being ready if the barges ever stop coming. Because food that is imported from so far away loses some of its nutritional value, advocates of local food on Kaua'i also talk in terms of health. And, beyond that, Kaua'i's local food movement exists in the shadow of native Hawaiian civilization, which fed itself using only local resources. For many in Kaua'i's local food movement, learning how to grow food here is also about listening to the voices of native Hawaiians, learning from their legacy, and building for a way of life that is more deeply connected to the land, weather, and water.

These advocates form a complex ecology among themselves, and each group approaches the problem from a different angle: some work on the land themselves, growing food and improving the soil; some work in schools getting students hooked on fresh fruits and vegetables; some work in offices, putting pressure on local politicians to change policies to remove obstacles to the cultivation of local food.

Despite their differences, these advocates tend to work together: Perhaps because the island is so small, the food movement here is unusually interconnected. For example, the executive directors of Malama Kaua'i and the Waipa Foundation—two organizations helping to lead the struggle for local food here—both sit on the boards of the other's group.

That sense of interconnection, of being one single movement with a single goal, could be as important as the island's isolation in making a stronger local food economy a reality.

Some challenges to growing
Perhaps the most obvious way of increasing the capacity of local food on Kaua'i is to establish farms and gardens here. The island's tropical climate means that it's warm enough to grow fruits and vegetables all year round, and rainfall is plentiful— one of the wettest places on Earth is on Mount Wai'ale'ale, the highest peak on Kaua'i.

So, in terms of its natural conditions alone, the island should be an easy place to grow food. It's the human conditions that have presented challenges, especially ones involving soil, water, and access to land. For more than 100 years, cash crops like sugarcane and pineapple were grown here on large plantations, with heavy use of industrial pesticides and fertilizers. This weakened the island's soil, which tends to be low in organic matter to begin with. Many farmers here will tell you that, as a result, Kaua'i's soil requires years of careful nurturing before it bears good crops of fruits and vegetables.

As Lisa Fuller of One Song Farms, an organic farm on the island's north shore, put it, "We don't grow food here; we grow soil."

The plantations affected the flow of water, too, as major canals were built to direct water to their crops. Many of those ditches are in still in use by the four transnational corporations currently raising genetically modified corn, soy, and canola on the island.

These companies, which sell seeds that are used by mainland farmers to grow GMO crops, became the focus of a major controversy here when they strongly opposed legislation that would require them to avoid spraying chemicals within a buffer zone around schools and hospitals, among other regulations. That legislation passed, after a drawn-out process, and the companies have responded by suing the county government.

Some farmers have complained that the companies also divert too much water from local rivers, and environmental nonprofit Earthjustice has filed a petition demanding procedural changes that would result in the companies taking less of it.

A third challenge is the expense of obtaining land for agricultural use. Land is a limited resource on this small island and prices are further inflated by the thriving tourism industry here.



Jillian Seals works in a row of carrots at her Kilauea farm. Photo by the author.

Take the case of Jillian Seals, who with her husband Gary has farmed 12 acres of land in the town of Kilauea for eight years. "The barn was here when we got here and nothing else," Seals said while giving this reporter a tour of the farm. "Everything else was just grass that was taller than you and I."

Regardless of its lack of infrastructure and the limited supply of water it receives from the county, the land was priced at $2.6 million. Wryly, Seals observes that she'd need to sell a lot of lettuce to afford its purchase.

Instead, she ended up leasing the land from its eventual buyer, who wanted to keep it in agriculture. Today, Seals runs the island's largest CSA operation on the island and the only one that accepts EBT, or food stamps.

Making land available

Seals' story illustrates how becoming an independent farmer on Kaua'i requires not only skill and patience but also luck—if the owners of Seals' farm had wanted to develop the property into condominiums, for instance, that land would not be a farm today.

The good news is that more land is likely to become available to farmers and gardeners in the near future. A statewide policy project has identified what it calls "Important Agricultural Lands"—fertile land with access to water, among other conditions—and put in place a number of incentives designed to encourage landowners to keep these lands in agriculture. These incentives include tax breaks, the ability to legally construct housing for farmworkers, and loan guarantees, according to the Hawai'i Department of Agriculture.

As is the case with many other advances in the cause of local food on Kaua'i, these policies have taken decades to implement. The Important Agricultural Lands process was first proposed in 1978, but didn't result in specific legislation until 2005. Only in 2009 did the tax incentives that form the cornerstone of the policy become available to landowners.

In addition, the island's local government is talking about opening a number of agriculture parks that would be available to small commercial farmers. The one that's planned in Kilauea, not far from the Seals' farm, is the closest to opening, and will be about 75 acres in size. While the exact details are still being worked out, Kilauea's agriculture park is likely to include a community garden, a farmers market, and a recycling center, as well as plots for commercial farmers and a farm incubator program.

Keone Kealoha has been one of the principle organizers behind the effort to make the Kilauea agriculture park a reality. Hearing him talk about it, it's clear that the push for land access in Hawai'i requires a strategy measured in decades rather than years. After 12 years spent on the mainland working in the dot-com industry and spinning dance music at clubs (he's still a practicing DJ), Kealoha returned to the island in 2005.

The following year, he says cofounded Malama Kaua'i (the phrase means "take care of Kaua'i" in Hawaiian) with the goal of promoting sustainability. When that goal came to seem too broad, he chose to focus the project on local food. The first step in that process was the founding of a one-acre community garden.

Today, that garden has 42 plots, all of which are in use, and is the most active on the island. The people who garden there range from immigrants from the Philippines to young couples from the mainland. All are getting used to the challenges of getting in the dirt and growing their own food.

After the establishment of the garden, Malama Kaua'i began starting projects that addressed local food issues from several different angles. For a time the group focused on its School Garden Network and was successful in starting or improving gardens in more than half of the island's 27 schools. They also published a "green map" that listed sustainability-focused nonprofit organizations on the island, and expanded activities in the community garden. Then, in 2012, the group planted a two-acre food forest around the community garden, providing a visual and noise barrier while also providing locals with tree crops such as bananas, papayas, and avocados.

Kealoha says that Malama Kaua'i's experience with these projects—and the overlapping skill sets of research, community outreach, and sustainable agriculture—forms the foundation they'll need to successfully manage the much larger agriculture park.

"It's a scaled-up version of what we've been doing here," he says. "And, from an administration standpoint, we've figured that out, I think."

What's more, the Kilauea agriculture park might not be the only one to open in the near future. At a December meeting of the Kaua'i County Council, George Costa, the director of the island's Office of Economic Development, presented a plan that described five agriculture parks currently being discussed. The Kilauea park appeared in the plan, as well as three more near the towns of Anahola, Koloa, and Kekaha, and a fifth on state-owned land near the Kalepa Mountain Forest Preserve.

The culture changers
Freeing up land and getting farmers onto it is a key part of building local food on Kaua'i. But it won't solve the problem by itself.

Just like on the mainland, the island has a mall and a Costco and a Walmart. It has chain restaurants like McDonalds and Burger King and Starbucks. Tens of thousands of working-class islanders work full-time jobs in hotels and resorts and don't have much attention left for gardening, let alone farming. Many prefer to eat quickly and conveniently.

The result is that no matter how much local food is produced here, it won't change the numbers significantly unless people become more aware of what they're eating and value the increased freshness and nutrition that comes with local food. They also have to know how to prepare fresh fruits and vegetables and to enjoy eating the food made with them.

The Waipa Foundation, another Kaua'i nonprofit, focuses on this side of the problem. And the people who work there believe that part of the solution is education about Hawai'i's past, both distant and not-so-distant.

"When I grew up, these were quiet fishing towns where we still fished and farmed," says Stacey Sproat-Beck, the foundation's executive director. "So it wasn't that long ago—in my parents' generation—that people lived off the land here."

Sproat-Beck is a 43-year-old mother who still lives in the house she grew up in. After doing her undergraduate work at the University of Southern California, she returned to Kaua'i in 1994 and began working with Waipa, which manages a 1,600-acre territory that runs from a local mountaintop through the forests and farmland to the shore in a single pie-shaped watershed.

Native Hawaiians called such an area of land an ahupua'a, and used it as the basis of all land management. They hunted in the upland forests, farmed in the lowlands, and fished on the shore. The ahupua'a at Waipa is one of just a handful in all of Hawai'i that are traditionally managed, according to Sproat-Beck. And her organization is using it to make sure that young people know what sustainable land management in Hawai'i might look like—and, of course, that they know how to eat well.

More than 4,000 young people visit the Waipa Foundation's land every year, either as visitors or as volunteers or as students at the Akamai School, a middle school that is housed there. Visitors get what Sproat-Beck calls a "four-hour multisensory experience" that includes pulling out invasive plant species in the forest, assisting with the peeling and preparation of taro roots in the lowlands, and learning about sea currents and ocean life on the shore. It also includes plenty of eating: the foundation feeds visitors meals of local greens, fish (often spear-caught by students at the Akamai School) and poi—a highly nutritious pink paste made by grinding up taro roots.

"Almost everybody that comes through here goes away changed," Sproat-Beck says, pointing out local kids who've gone on to become taro farmers and gardeners.

Many others are changed in subtler ways. "They're used to going out in the garden. We can send them out and they can harvest their own kale, make a kale salad, serve it to their parents and family. It seems like they are just way more connected to the land."

The folks at the Waipa Foundation are not the only ones working to change culture in a way that encourages the growing, catching, and eating of local food. Every organic farmer YES! spoke to while researching this story had an education program that brought local—and sometimes international—groups of students through their land to learn about agriculture and try the food.
 

In it for the long haul
How much have these efforts changed the numbers on the ground? The big number—the roughly 90 percent of food that's imported—hasn't changed in any measurable way. But other indicators are beginning to shift. For example, sales at Kaua'i farmers markets rose by a significant 26 percent between 2011 and 2012, according to local newspaper The Garden Island.

Changes like that, together with all of the shifts in policy, culture, and education that local food advocates on Kaua'i are helping to build, seem poised to push the needle back on the big number in coming decades.

That may seem like a long way off, but local food advocates like Kealoha, Sproat-Beck, and Seals all say they're in it for the long haul. Each one seems intimately aware that the way people eat is deeply ingrained and unlikely to change quickly. Instead, it changes through experiences accumulated over a lifetime—experiences that their work already helps to provide.

It's not an easy or simple struggle, but the rewards are tantalizing. They include improved nutrition, a more secure and reliable food supply, and greater political sovereignty.

That last benefit is especially visible in a place like Kaua'i, where the indigenous memory of colonization remains fresh and raw.

"I think food sovereignty is sovereignty, really," Kealoha says. "If you can resolve your food issue, then you have the opportunity to take more time about some of the other things."

.

Message To World Elites

SUBHEAD: : Don’t bet the farm on coal and oil growth. The limits of consumption have been met.

By Kumi Naidoo on 25 January 2014 for Counter Currents -
(http://www.countercurrents.org/naidoo250114.htm)


Image above: In Harbin, China, of Russian border, a traffic officer holds up his hands in suffocating smog. Schools and some highways had to be shut down. From (http://framework.latimes.com/2013/10/21/super-smog-hits-north-china-city-harbin/#/7).

A mind-boggling sum of about US$ 800 for each person on the planet is invested into fossil fuel companies through the global capital markets alone. That’s roughly 10% of the total capital invested in listed companies. The amount of money invested into the 200 biggest fossil fuel companies through financial markets is estimated at US$ 5.5 trillion.

By keeping their money in coal and oil companies, investors are betting a vast amount of wealth, including the pensions and savings of millions of people, on high future demand for dirty fuels.

The investment has enabled fossil fuel companies to massively raise their spending on expanding extractable reserves, with oil and gas companies alone (state-owned ones included) spending the combined GDP of Netherlands and Belgium a year, in belief that there will be ongoing demand for dirty fuel.

This assumption is being challenged by recent developments, which is good news for climate but bad news for anyone who thought investing in fossil fuel industries was a safe bet.

Frantic growth in coal consumption seems to be coming to an end much sooner than predicted just a few years ago, with China’s aggressive clean air policies, rapidly dropping coal consumption in the US and upcoming closures of many coal plants in Europe.

At the same time the oil industry is also facing slowing demand growth, and the financial and share performance of oil majors is disappointing for shareholders.

Nevertheless, even faced with weakening demand prospects, outdated investment patterns are driving fossil fuel companies to waste trillions of dollars in developing reserves and infrastructure that will be stranded as the world moves beyond 20th century energy.

A good example is coal export developments. The large recent investment in coal export capacity in all key exporter countries was based on the assumption of unlimited growth of Chinese demand. When public outrage over air pollution reached a new level in 2012-2013, the Chinese leadership moved swiftly to mandate absolute reductions in coal consumption, and banned new coal-fired power plants in key economic regions.

A growing chorus of financial analysts is now projecting a peak in Chinese coal demand soon, which seemed unimaginable only a couple of years ago. This new reality has already reduced market capitalization of export-focused coal companies. Even in China itself, investment in coal-fired power plants has now outpaced demand growth, leading to drops in capacity utilization.

Another example of potentially stranded assets is found in Europe, where large utilities ignored the writing on the wall about EU moves to price carbon and boost renewable energy. Betting on old business models and the fossil-fuel generation, they built a huge 80 gigawatts of new fossil power generation capacity in the past 10 years, much of which is already generating losses and now risk becoming stranded assets.

Arctic oil drilling is possibly the ultimate example of fossil companies’ unfounded confidence in high future demand. Any significant production and revenue is unlikely until 2030 and in the meantime, Arctic drilling faces high and uncertain costs, extremely demanding and risky operations, as well as the prospect of heavy regulation and liabilities when (not if) the first major blowout happens in the region.

No wonder the International Energy Agency is sceptical about Arctic oil, assuming hardly any production in the next 20 years.

Those investing in coal and oil have perhaps felt secure seeing the global climate negotiations proceed at a disappointing pace.

However, the initial carbon crunch is being delivered by increasingly market-driven renewable energy development, and by national-level clean energy and energy efficiency policies – such as renewable energy support schemes and emission regulation in Europe, or clean air policies in the US and in China. Global coal demand, and possibly even oil demand, could peak even before a strong climate treaty is agreed.

Investors often underestimate their exposure to fossil fuels, particularly indirect exposure through, for example, passively managed pension funds and sovereign debt of strongly fossil fuel dependent states. Assessing exposure, requiring fossil energy companies to disclose and reduce carbon risks, and reducing investments in sunset energy technologies will lead to profitable investment in a world that moves to cleaner and smarter energy systems.

• Kumi Naidoo is Executive Director of Greenpeace International

.

Dark skin - Blue eyes

SUBHEAD: Light skin genes evolved more recently than previously thought. Related to agriculture not latitude.

By Tia Ghose on 27 January 2014 for Huffington Post -
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/27/light-skin-genes-dna_n_4673328.html)


Image above: A progression of sketches shows how a skull and genetic clues were combined to come up with the look of a 7,000-year-old hunter-gatherer who lived in Spain. From (http://www.nbcnews.com/science/dark-skin-blue-eyes-genes-paint-picture-7-000-year-2D11996418).

In ancient European hunter-gatherer man had dark skin and blue eyes, a new genetic analysis has revealed.

The analysis of the man, who lived in modern-day Spain only about 7,000 years ago, shows light-skin genes in Europeans evolved much more recently than previously thought.

The findings, which were detailed today (Jan. 26) in the journal Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain.

Sunlight changes
Many scientists have believed that lighter skin gradually arose in Europeans starting around 40,000 years ago, soon after people left tropical Africa for Europe's higher latitudes. The hunter-gatherer's dark skin pushes this date forward to only 7,000 years ago, suggesting that at least some humans lived considerably longer than thought in Europe before losing the dark pigmentation that evolved under Africa's sun.

"It was assumed that the lighter skin was something needed in high latitudes, to synthesize vitamin D in places where UV light is lower than in the tropics," Lalueza-Fox told LiveScience.

Scientists had assumed this was true because people need vitamin D for healthy bones, and can synthesize it in the skin with energy from the sun's UV rays, but darker skin, like that of the hunter-gatherer man, prevents UV-ray absorption.

But the new discovery shows that latitude alone didn't drive the evolution of Europeans' light skin. If it had, light skin would have become widespread in Europeans millennia earlier, Lalueza-Fox said.
 
Mysterious find

In 2006, hikers discovered two male skeletons buried in a labyrinthine cave known as La BraƱa-Arintero, in the Cantabrian Mountains of Spain. [Images of the Ancient Skeletons]

At first, officials thought the skeletons may have been recent murder victims. But then, an analysis revealed the skeletons were about 7,000 years old, and had no signs of trauma. The bodies were covered with red soil, characteristic of Paleolithic burial sites, Lalueza-Fox said.

At the time of the discovery, genetic techniques weren't advanced enough to analyze the skeletons. Several years later, the team revisited the skeletons and extracted DNA from a molar tooth in one skeleton. (The other skeleton had been sitting in water for millennia, so his DNA was more degraded, Lalueza-Fox said.)
 
Blue eyes, dark skin

 The new analysis of that DNA now shows the man had the gene mutation for blue eyes, but not the European mutations for lighter skin.

The DNA also shows that the man was more closely related to modern-day northern Europeans than to southern Europeans.

The discovery may explain why baby blues are more common in Scandinavia. It's been thought that poor conditions in northern Europe delayed the agricultural revolution there, so Scandinavians may have more genetic traces of their hunter-gatherer past — including a random blue-eye mutation that emerged in the small population of ancient hunter-gatherers, Lalueza-Fox said.

Skin changes

The finding implies that for most of their evolutionary history, Europeans were not what many people today would call 'Caucasian', said Guido Barbujani, president of the Associazione Genetica Italiana in Ferrara, Italy, who was not involved in the study.

Instead, "what seems likely, then, is that the dietary changes accompanying the so-called Neolithic revolution, or the transition from food collection to food production, might have caused, or contributed to cause, this change," Barbujani said.

In the food-production theory, the cereal-rich diet of Neolithic farmers lacked vitamin D, so Europeans rapidly lost their dark-skin pigmentation only once they switched to agriculture, because it was only at that point that they had to synthesize vitamin D from the sun more readily.


Image above: A contemporary dark skinned blue eyed boy from Sembehun in Sierra Leone who is deaf and mute. From (http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/photo-contest/2011/entries/112262/view/).

.

MLK - A Call to Conscience

SUBHEAD: A film about Martin Luther King's commitment to peace and social justice.

By Ray Catania on 26 February 2014 in Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2014/01/mlk-call-to-conscience.html)


Image above: From (http://lifeondoverbeach.wordpress.com/2014/01/20/mlk-the-ultimate-measure-of-a-man/).

WHAT:
Free Movie: MLK: A Call to Conscience, narrated by Tavis Smiley of PBS, details the controversial opposition that Dr King took on the Vietnam War and militarism, evoking the anger of then President Johnson and the FBI's J Edgar Hoover.

There will also be music by Kauai social justice activists Blu Dux and Danitza Galvan, and short speeches by Raise the Wage HI, Local 5 Hotel Workers Union and Pride at Work, Kauai Chapter.

WHERE:
Kapaa Public Library
1464 Kuhio Hwy
Kapaa, HI 96746

WHEN:
Sunday, February 9th, 2014 from 1:00 to 4:00 pm.

CONTACT:
Ray Catania
Phone 808-634-2737 or 808-332-0952   
Email: may11nieteen71@gmail.com

SPONSOR:
The event is presented by Kauai Alliance for Peace and Social Justice, Raise the Wage HI, and Pride at Work Kauai Chapter.

MORE:
"A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on war than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death."
Martin Luther King, Jr
Spoken one year before Dr King was assassinatd in Memphis, Tennessee.  Dr King was about to lead a march of mostly African-American sanitation workers who were fighting agains "Jim Crow" racism and for decent waes and union recognitions.

During his adult life, Dr King was never neutral on issues of social injustice.  Because he acted on his beliefs, he and his supporters would face brutal attacks and arrest.

The movie delves into one of Martin Luther King Jr.'s greatest speeches, "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence," which Dr. King delivered on April 4, 1967. Today this speech is acknowledged to be one of the most powerful ever written by Dr. King and Smiley deconstructs the meaning of the speech, as well as put it in a contemporary context, particularly in light of our nation's current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

ONLINE:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/tavissmiley/tsr/mlk-a-call-to-conscience/


Video above: Trailer for movie "MLK: A Call to Conscious". From (http://youtu.be/72peuBUy5E4).

See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: Peaceful Protest a Crime 10/12/12
 

.

"Right to Farm"

SUBHEAD: Kauai state reps sell us out to Big Ag with bill to supersede local laws supporting our communities.

By Linda Pascatore on 26 January 2014 in Island Breath
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2014/01/right-to-farm.html)


Image above: Cheeeze! The Kauai delegation to the Hawaii legislature. L to R are Sen Ron Kouchi, Representatives Dee Morikawa, Derek Kawakami, and James Tokioka. From (http://www.midweekkauai.com/when-rains-come-so-does-kokua/).

Two Bills were introduced Friday in the State Legislature http://thegardenisland.com/news/local/farming-forever/article_268fa3aa-8654-11e3-bf4d-0019bb2963f4.html).  They were sponsored by our local state representatives, Dee Morikawa, Koloa-Niihau, and James Tokioka, Koloa-Wailua. 

These bills would take away county authority to regulate agriculture, including pesticides.  It would supersede Kauai County ordinance 960 (formerly Bill 2491), which regulates pesticides and GMO crops.  It would also nullify the recently passed Big Island law which bans new genetically modified crops.

I am very disappointed in this attempt to overthrow the democratic process at the local, county level.  I urge you to contact your state representatives to let them know your stance on these issues.

Personally, I believe the local, county level is the only way for individuals to make a difference and effect any change in policy.  This new state law attempts to take away any local power we have, and put the control in the hands of state level people.

I can't help but believe that most politicians at the State or Federal level are bought and paid for by corporations who fund their elections.  It is possible for an aspiring politician to win at the county level with individual support and donations, but the state and federal elections are much to big to win without corporate money.

We should be able to pass local laws concerning public health issues, and protect ourselves from corporations which endanger our health and well being for profit.

So, let our representatives know how strongly we feel about this issue.  Write, call or email them!


Representative Dee Morikawa
House District 16
Hawaii State Capitol
Room 310
phone: 808-586-6280
fax: 808-586-6281
repmorikawa@capitol.hawaii.gov

Representative James Tokioka
House District 15
Hawaii State Capitol
Room 322
phone: 808-586-6270
fax: 808-586-6271
reptokioka@capitol.hawaii.gov

Representative Derek Kawakami
House District 14
Hawaii State Capitol
Room 314
phone: 808-586-8435
fax: 808-586-8437
repkawakami@capitol.hawaii.gov

Senator Ron Kouchi
Senate District 8
Hawaii State Capitol
Room 206
phone: 808-586-6030
fax: 808-586-6031
senkouchi@Capitol.hawaii.gov
.

Slaughter in Asian Pacific

SUBHEAD: U.S. Ambassador to Japan Carolyn Kennedy criticizes Japan's traditional dolphin slaughter.

By Koohan Paik on 27 January 2014 in Alternet.org -
(http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/caroline-kennedy-criticizes-dolphin-slaughters)


Image above: Every year the fishermen of Taiji, in western Wakayama prefecture, drive hundreds of dolphins into a cove, select some for sale to marine parks, release some and kill the rest for meat. From (http://life-sea.blogspot.com/2011/08/life-of-dugong.html).

New Ambassador Caroline Kennedy Shocks the Japanese with strong criticism of Japan's cruel dolphin slaughters. What comes next?

Tough talk from the U.S., but the Pentagon's shift of military forces to the Asia-Pacific region that may have its own impact on marine ecosystems.

Cetacean lovers are celebrating the recent, brash statement of newly appointed U.S. ambassador to Japan, Caroline Kennedy, in her condemnation of Japan’s tradition of dolphin slaughter.

Now that she finds herself professionally and geographically smack-dab in the middle of Obama’s “Pacific Pivot” toward Asia, she has the opportunity to bring more to light on the veritable ecological holocaust taking place in the Asia-Pacific.

While the Pentagon describes the Pacific Pivot as a shift of military forces to the Asia-Pacific to counter a rising China, we hear precious little about how this plays out environmentally. The military pivot is reigning terror over cetaceans, coral reefs, migratory seabirds and marine ecosystems throughout the vast, dying Pacific Ocean.

Local residents in Okinawa, the Mariana Islands, and Jeju Island (South Korea) are the communities that have been most vocally opposed to the plan to blanket the Asia-Pacific with destructive military bases.

The most appalling example is the proposed Mariana Islands Training and Testing region (MITT), which would open up approximately one million square miles of open ocean to full-spectrum, year-round live-fire military practice, over an area larger than the states of Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Montana and New Mexico, combined.

It would also include the whole of the supposedly “protected” Marianas Trench Marine National Monument, established by President Bush in 2009.

Full-spectrum” live-fire military exercises means year-round amphibious attacks, bombing, torpedos, underwater mines and other detonations from the air, from the sea, and from the ground, as well as sonar training that will result in permanent hearing loss for scores of whales and dolphins. 

The U.S. military has been conducting such full-spectrum live-fire training for the past three-and-a-half years over a half-million square miles of the open Pacific, and also upon the island of Farallon de Medinilla. Farallon de Medinilla, once teeming with pretty commonplace sea life and rare migratory birds, has been bombed and disfigured to unrecognizability.

On Guam, the most southerly Mariana island, the military is planning on dredging over 70 acres of one of the world’s healthiest and most vibrant coral reefs, to make way for a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. Scientists say that, if the project is allowed to move forward, the reef will be destroyed before many of its endemic species can even be discovered, let alone saved.


Image above: A scuba diving man and a dugong. There are only about 50 Okinawan dugongs left at Henoko Bay, the best remaining habitat for the endangered species, and the proposed site for a land-filled military airfield. From (http://life-sea.blogspot.com/2011/08/life-of-dugong.html).

Further west, the Pentagon is eyeing Okinawa’s most lovely, pristine bay, at Henoko, to build yet another base. Okinawa already contains 38 military facilities and 26,000 troops. In a 2009 letter to President Obama, over 400 environmental organizations urged him to cancel plans to build the base, in order to preserve the best remaining habitat for 50 Okinawan dugongs, a rare manatee that is a cultural treasure in Okinawa.

But Obama never responded, and now, five years later, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has called the base construction “absolutely critical” to regional security. Okinawans, however, see nothing “secure” about the irreversible destruction of their land and resources by U.S. forces.

After decades of rapes, crime, noise pollution, aircraft crashes, continual contamination of land and water, and a host of other base-related evils, the Okinawans believe real security will come only when the troops are out entirely.

And to the north, on the southern Korean island of Jeju, villagers have been conducting a 24-hour protest vigil for the past seven years, outside the construction site of a high-tech navy base being built by the South Korean government to function as a key nexus in the U.S. military pivot.

Nearly half completed, the base is intended to house up to 8,000 marines and 20 warships, including nuclear submarines, giant aircraft carriers, and destroyers equipped with cruise missiles. It is being constructed in an area rich with spectacular soft-coral habitats that provide sustenance to Korea’s only remaining pod of dolphins, and is directly adjacent to a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. Tragically, much of the coral has been dredged, leaving the dolphins to perish.


Image above: Photo of sacred and spectacular soft corals of Gangjeong on Jeju Island, Korea, by Katherine Muzik, Ph.D. From (http://savejejunow.org/sacred-spectacular-soft-corals-gangjeong/).

On land, Jeju base construction has cemented over a one-mile stretch of what was once a wondrous rocky wetland bubbling with pure freshwater springs. The area had served as a unique breeding ground for over 500 species seaweed and 86 species of unusual shellfish, as well as three endangered species: the red-footed crab, the endemic Jeju freshwater shrimp, and the boreal digging frog.

As recently as two years ago, this coastline had provided the village with the Earth’s finest nutrition for the past several thousand years. Today, this once-thriving ecosystem is dead, and villagers must look for jobs to survive– perhaps at one of the many fast-food joints sprouting up to accommodate the new base economy.

Regardless of which nation is to blame, the death knell tolls for all marine creatures in the Asia-Pacific. Ms. Kennedy, who clearly cares about the humane treatment of all living things, is in a position to make a difference at this critical juncture in environmental history.

Let's hope she can bring equal attention to how the American tradition of militarism is ravaging our average ocean, just as she has spoken out on the barbarity of Japan’s dolphin-hunting tradition. That would give the cetaceans real reason to rejoice.

• Koohan Paik is a journalist, media educator, and Campaign Director of the Asia-Pacific program at the International Forum on Globalization. She is also a Fellow with the Korea Policy Institute. In 2011 and 2013, she helped to organize the Moana Nui conference in Honolulu, which brought together international activists, scholars, politicians and artists to consolidate Asia-Pacific discourse as it relates to geopolitics, resource depletion, human rights and global trade. She is the co-author of The Superferry Chronicles: Hawaii’s Uprising Against Militarism, Commercialism and the Desecration of the Earth, and has written on militarism in the Asia-Pacific for The Nation, Progressive, and other publications.

See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: An ugly dance - The Asian Pivot Dec 5, 2013
Ea O Ka Aina: Help save Mariana Islands Nov 17, 2013
Ea O Ka Aina: KIUC Strategic Plan Briefing Nov 7, 2013
Ea O Ka Aina: Moana Nui Confereence Nov 1, 2013
Ea O Ka Aina: Pagan Island beauty threatened Oct 26, 2013
Ea O Ka Aina: The Ghosts of Jeju Oct 16, 2013
Ea O Ka Aina: GUAM - Another Strategic Island  Nov 9, 2009
Ea O Ka Aina: Diego Garcia - Another stolen island Nov 6, 2009




.

Hawaii GMO Labeling Bill

SUBHEAD: Get on board with support of Hawaii State Legislature GMO labeling bill today. Time critical.

By Brad Parsons on 25 January 2014 in Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2014/01/hawaii-gmo-labeling-bill.html)


Image above: A pro-GMO post depicting GMO labeling. From (http://akshatrathi.com/2012/05/29/beating-nature-at-its-own-game/).

Friday, January 24th, just after we sent out our most recent update, the Hawaii Senate Health Committee scheduled the first of the GMO Labeling bills for a hearing on January 27th:

Step #1
Review the GMO labeling bill:
Please go to:  http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=2736  It will look like this:

SB2736
Measure Title:RELATING TO FOOD LABELING.
Report Title: Genetically Engineered Material; Labeling Requirements
Description: Establishes, beginning January 1, 2015, labeling requirements for any food or raw agricultural commodity sold in the State that contains a genetically engineered material, or was produced with a genetically engineered material; establishes exceptions; establishes violations; requires director of health to adopt rules.
Companion:
Package:None
Current Referral: HTH/CPN, WAM
Introducer(s):ENGLISH, CHUN OAKLAND, GABBARD, GREEN, RUDERMAN, SHIMABUKURO, Ihara, Keith-Agaran, L. Thielen

Sort by DateStatus Text
1/17/2014SIntroduced.
1/21/2014SPassed First Reading.
1/21/2014SReferred to HTH, CPN.
1/23/2014SRe-Referred to HTH/CPN, WAM.
1/24/2014SThe committee(s) on HTH has scheduled a public hearing on 01-27-14 1:30PM in conference room 229.

S = Senate | H = House | D = Data Systems | $ = Appropriation measure | ConAm = Constitutional Amendment

Step #2
Submit your testimony:
If you don't have an account with (http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov), you can set one up easily and it is free. Click on "Register" button in the upper right-hand corner of page.

Return to SB2736 page and cClick on the blue "Submit Testimony" at top of page and it will take you to a page that looks like this:



you can fill out the information depicted in the above graphic.  Minimum, you only need to highlight the "Support" dot for SB2736, along with your acct. name and email.  If you want under "Additional Comments," you can write a few sentences or paragraphs in support of a GMO Labeling bill.  You can also attach any supporting documentation you want (like a particularly good article on GMO's or labeling) with the "Testimony file to upload" option, but you don't have to.

The most testimony the Hawaii Legislature ever got on this issue was last year with HB174 in four different hearing dates; on one of those dates they received about 1000 pieces of testimony or indications of sentiment.  We've got over 3000 people here.  Let's see if we can top 1000 people showing "Support" for SB2736.  Everybody on this list can participate.  Need Action on this As Soon As Possible in the next 24 hours.  Let's see what we can do to start with on this first one.

Step #3
Get involved with the online petition for Hawaii GMO labeling legislation.

Click here for MoveOn.com petition drive: (http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/gmo-labeling-in-hawaii). This petition for labeling GMOs in Hawaii is going to Hawaii Governor Abercrombie.


.

KIUC wins SmartMeter referendum

SUBHEAD: KIUC wins battle for no-SmartMeter surcharge and loses the war for hearts and minds.

By Doug Wilmore on 25 January 2014 in Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2014/01/kuic-wins-smartmeter-referendum.html)


Image above: Waking up from the Matrix (the Grid) and detaching. From (http://riverbankoftruth.com/2013/11/29/dont-fake-it-by-greg-calise/).

If you look at the stock market news and results concerning publicly held electrical companies you will see that the smart money is moving away from this sector --- not involving just the coal generating plants but the entire sector.

Solar and other renewables are the competition, and no matter what the PUC does to attempt to prop up the electric companies in Hawaii, people are voting with their feet and moving to solar.

The utilities will counter by changing their rate structure (with the blessing of the PUC) or possibly limiting rooftop solar, but those move will be countered by changes in technology.

At present, used batteries from hybrid cars are being refurbrished to 80% capacity and installed in homes in Japan. Home generating units installed on lease will follow.

New housing developments will likely install their own power units and undercut centrally located older power sources.

The military will come of the grid because of its vulnerability to hackers and shut down, a national security problem.

While the PUC in Hawaii will continue to support the utilities over the people the evolution of electric power generation will do much more than passive government regulation to change the land scape.

Smart CEOs on the mainland are embracing these changes and altering their business model. To plan for the future the PUC needs to support smart and creative business managers, not smart meters. The change it is a coming.



KIUC board decision stands
SUBHEAD: Members of Kauai Island Utility Cooperative voted to keep a fee structure in place that charges only members who opt out of using a smart meter.

By Tom Hasslinger on 26 January 2014 for the Garden Island -
(http://thegardenisland.com/news/local/smart-meter-fees-stand/article_e97db2d0-8654-11e3-9b2b-0019bb2963f4.html)

Of the 10,901 ballots received, 8,010 voted in favor of the fees while 2,797 opposed.

The nearly 11,000 ballots amounted to a record turnout for a co-op election, with 43 percent of the 25,205 members casting a vote, according to a KIUC press release Saturday.

“The record voter turnout along with the big margin for ‘yes’ votes suggests that the vast majority of members were engaged, understood what was at stake and wanted to send a clear message that they supported the board’s decision to charge the fees,” said Allan Smith, chairman of the KIUC board of directors, in a press release. “We’re grateful for that support and we thank the members on both sides of the issue who took the time to vote.”

Since November 2013, KIUC has charged $10.27 a month to customers who choose not to use a wireless smart meter.

The charge, which was approved by the Public Utilities Commission, covers the cost of manually reading the meters. KIUC also charges one-time fees to customers who ask to have their meter switched to anything other than a smart meter.

The deadline to vote was noon Saturday. The election began earlier this month after concerned members petitioned to have the issue put to a vote.

The results broke down to 74 percent in favor of the fees, while 26 percent were opposed.

The nearly 3,000 votes against the fees mirrors the number of people who have opted out of using a smart meter since the co-op began installing them.

Had the board’s decision been overturned, fees for servicing non smart meter users — roughly $340,000 a year — would have been spread across all members.

Those against smart meters have cited health and privacy concerns with the devices.

Jonathan Jay, one of three drafters of a petition which ultimately sent the issue to a vote, said he was more excited about the high voter turnout than disappointed about the result.

He called the mass participation a positive sign and a step in the right direction.

“It’s awesome that so many people took part in the election,” said Jay, who is running for a board seat, after learning the outcome. “I think that’s good for the co-op and good for democracy and I think that’s the most important thing for a co-op. And I’m glad we’ve had that conversation.”

Members voted by mail, by phone and online between Jan. 4 and Saturday. The election was conducted by Merriman River Group, a Connecticut-based election management firm.

Counting was observed by a representative of the Oahu branch of the League of Women Voters, KIUC said in the press release.

The cost of the current election has been pegged at $63,000.

The campaign season saw advertising by both sides, as well as a injunction request by member Adam Asquith that aimed to block the co-op from collecting non-smart meter fees, but it was denied in 5th Circuit Court last week.

The previous record voter turnout was 34 percent in the 2003 directors’ election, when 7,595 members voted, KIUC said.

Thirty-two ballots were marked over or under, which means they either voted for neither or both decision-points.

Sixty-two ballots were voided, which could be for a marked out bar-code so it couldn’t be read or the ballot wasn’t returned in the special envelope or the member voted online and then sent in a mail ballot.

See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: Kauai's foolish electric company 1/19/14
.

2nd Crash Approaching?

SUBHEAD: Twenty early warning signs that we are approaching a global economic meltdown.

By Michael Snyder on 23 January 2014 for Economic Collapse Blog -
(http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/20-early-warning-signs-that-we-are-approaching-a-global-economic-meltdown)


Image above: Painting by Alex Scahefer of Chase bank burning on Main Street, USA. From (http://www.laweekly.com/informer/2011/09/07/banks-on-fire-paintings-by-artist-alex-schaefer-inspire-lapd-concern-now-collectors-willing-to-pay-thousands).

Have you been paying attention to what has been happening in Argentina, Venezuela, Brazil, Ukraine, Turkey and China?  If you are like most Americans, you have not been.

Most Americans don't seem to really care too much about what is happening in the rest of the world, but they should.  In major cities all over the globe right now, there is looting, violence, shortages of basic supplies, and runs on the banks.  We are not at a "global crisis" stage yet, but things are getting worse with each passing day.

For a while, I have felt that 2014 would turn out to be a major "turning point" for the global economy, and so far that is exactly what it is turning out to be.  The following are 20 early warning signs that we are rapidly approaching a global economic meltdown...

#1 The looting, violence and economic chaos that is happening in Argentina right now is a perfect example of what can happen when you print too much money...
For Dominga Kanaza, it wasn’t just the soaring inflation or the weeklong blackouts or even the looting that frayed her nerves.
It was all of them combined.
At one point last month, the 37-year-old shop owner refused to open the metal shutters protecting her corner grocery in downtown Buenos Aires more than a few inches -- just enough to sell soda to passersby on a sweltering summer day.
#2 The value of the Argentine Peso is absolutely collapsing.

#3 Widespread shortages, looting and accelerating inflation are also causing huge problems in Venezuela...
Economic mismanagement in Venezuela has reached such a level that it risks inciting a violent popular reaction. Venezuela is experiencing declining export revenues, accelerating inflation and widespread shortages of basic consumer goods. At the same time, the Maduro administration has foreclosed peaceful options for Venezuelans to bring about a change in its current policies.
President Maduro, who came to power in a highly-contested election last April, has reacted to the economic crisis with interventionist and increasingly authoritarian measures. His recent orders to slash prices of goods sold in private businesses resulted in episodes of looting, which suggests a latent potential for violence. He has put the armed forces on the street to enforce his economic decrees, exposing them to popular discontent.
#4 In a stunning decision, the Venezuelan government has just announced that it has devalued the Bolivar by more than 40 percent.

#5 Brazilian stocks declined sharply on Thursday.  [IB note: Friday the Dow tumbled 318 points. Dow futures are down 335 points as of 1/25]. There is a tremendous amount of concern that the economic meltdown that is happening in Argentina is going to spill over into Brazil.

#6 Ukraine is rapidly coming apart at the seams...
A tense ceasefire was announced in Kiev on the fifth day of violence, with radical protesters and riot police holding their position. Opposition leaders are negotiating with the government, but doubts remain that they will be able to stop the rioters.
#7 It appears that a bank run has begun in China...
As China's CNR reports, depositors in some of Yancheng City's largest farmers' co-operative mutual fund societies ("banks") have been unable to withdraw "hundreds of millions" in deposits in the last few weeks. "Everyone wants to borrow and no one wants to save," warned one 'salesperson', "and loan repayments are difficult to recover." There is "no money" and the doors are locked.
#8 Art Cashin of UBS is warning that credit markets in China "may be broken".  For much more on this, please see my recent article entitled "The $23 Trillion Credit Bubble In China Is Starting To Collapse – Global Financial Crisis Next?" 

#9 News that China's manufacturing sector is contracting shook up financial markets on Thursday...
Wall Street was rattled by a key reading on China's manufacturing which dropped below the key 50 level in January, according to HSBC. A reading below 50 on the HSBC flash manufacturing PMI suggests economic contraction.
#10 Japanese stocks experienced their biggest drop in 7 months on Thursday.

#11 The value of the Turkish Lira is absolutely collapsing.

#12 The unemployment rate in France has risen for 9 quarters in a row and recently soared to a new 16 year high.

#13 In Italy, the unemployment rate has soared to a brand new all-time record high of 12.7 percent.

#14 The unemployment rate in Spain is sitting at an all-time record high of 26.7 percent.

#15 This year, the Baltic Dry Index experienced the largest two week post-holiday decline that we have ever seen.

#16 Chipmaker Intel recently announced that it plans to eliminate 5,000 jobs over the coming year.

#17 CNBC is reporting that U.S. retailers just experienced "the worst holiday season since 2008".

#18 A recent CNBC article stated that U.S. consumers should expect a "tsunami" of store closings in the retail industry...
Get ready for the next era in retail—one that will be characterized by far fewer shops and smaller stores.
On Tuesday, Sears said that it will shutter its flagship store in downtown Chicago in April. It's the latest of about 300 store closures in the U.S. that Sears has made since 2010. The news follows announcements earlier this month of multiple store closings from major department stores J.C. Penney and Macy's.
Further signs of cuts in the industry came Wednesday, when Target said that it will eliminate 475 jobs worldwide, including some at its Minnesota headquarters, and not fill 700 empty positions.
#19 The U.S. Congress is facing another deadline to raise the debt ceiling in February.

#20 The Dow fell by more than 170 points on Thursday. It is becoming increasingly likely that "the peak of the market" is now in the rear view mirror.

And I have not even mentioned the extreme drought that has caused the U.S. cattle herd to drop to a 61 year low or the nuclear radiation from Fukushima that is washing up on the west coast.

In light of everything above, is there anyone out there that still wants to claim that "everything is going to be okay" for the global economy?

Sadly, most Americans are not even aware of most of these things.

All over the country today, the number one news headline is about Justin Bieber. The mainstream media is absolutely obsessed with celebrity scandals, and so is a very large percentage of the U.S. population.

A great economic storm is rapidly approaching, and most people don't even seem to notice the storm clouds that are gathering on the horizon.

In the end, perhaps we will get what we deserve as a nation.
.

Fukushima Fallout in Alaska

SUBHEAD: Aerial deposition onto sea ice of radioactive fallout from Fukushima and health implications to seals.

By Dr. Doug Dasher 24 January 2014 for Alaska Marine Science Symposium -
(http://www.alaskamarinescience.org/documents/2014%20Abstract%20Book.pdf)


Image above: Ice seal with symptoms of Unusual Mortality Event. From (http://rceezwhatnext.blogspot.com/2012/01/deaths-of-ringed-seals-in-alaska.html).

On March 11, 2011 off Japan’s west coast, an earthquake-generated tsunami struck the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant resulting in a major nuclear accident that included a large release of airborne radionuclides into the environment. Within five days of the accident atmospheric air masses carrying Fukushima radiation were transiting into the northern Bering and Chukchi seas.

During summer 2011 it became evident to coastal communities and wildlife management agencies that there was a novel disease outbreak occurring in several species of Arctic ice-associated seals.

Gross symptoms associated with the disease included lethargy, no new hair growth, and skin lesions, with the majority of the outbreak reports occurring between the Nome and Barrow region. NOAA
and USFWS declared an Alaska Northern Pinnipeds Unusual Mortality Event (UME) in late
winter of 2011.

The ongoing Alaska 2011 Northern Pinnipeds UME investigation continues to explore a mix of potential etiologies (infectious, endocrine, toxins, nutritious etc.), including radioactivity.

Currently, the underlying etiology remains undetermined.

We present results on gamma analysis (cesium 134 and 137) of muscle tissue from control and diseased seals, and discuss wildlife health implications from different possible routes of exposure to Fukushima fallout to ice seals.

Since the Fukushima fallout period occurred during the annual sea ice cover period from Nome to Barrow, a sea ice based fallout scenario in addition to a marine food web based one is of particular
relevance for the Fukushima accident.

Under a proposed sea ice fallout deposition scenario, radionuclides would have been settled onto sea ice.

Sea ice and snow would have acted as a temporary refuge for deposited radionuclides; thus radionuclides would have only become available for migration during the melting season and would not have entered the regional food web in any appreciable manner until breakup (pulsed release).

The cumulative on-ice exposure for ice seals would have occurred through external, inhalation, and non-equilibrium dietary pathways during the ice-based seasonal spring haulout period for molting/pupping/breeding activities.

Additionally, ice seals would have been under dietary/metabolic constraints and experiencing hormonal changes associated with reproduction and molting.

Contributors:
Dr.Doug Dasher, ddasher@alaska.edu
Environmental Engineer Associate II
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
610 University Avenue
Fairbanks, AK 99709-3643
Email:
ddasher@envircon.state.ak.us
Phone: (907) 451-2170
Fax: (907) 47 1 - 5146


John Kelley, jjkelley@alaska.edu
Professor at School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences
Institute of Marine Sciences
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Fairbanks, Alaska 99775
Email: ffjjk@uaf.edu
Phone: (907) 474-5585
Fax: (907) 474-7204 

Gay Sheffield, ggsheffield@alaska.edu
Raphaela Stimmelmayr, raphaela.stimmelmayr@north-slope.org



Staff on 24 January 2014 for Alaska Public Radio
(http://www.alaskapublic.org/2014/01/24/radiation-from-fukushima/)

UPCOMING:
HOST: Steve HeimelAlaska Public Radio Network

GUESTS:

  • Professor Doug Dasher, Environmental Oceanographer, University of Alaska Fairbanks School of Fisheries and Ocean Science
  • Dr. John Kelley, Professor Emeritus, University of Alaska Fairbanks, former Director, Naval Arctic Research Laboratory
  • Callers Statewide
PARTICIPATE:
  • Post your comment before, during or after the live broadcast (comments may be read on air).
  • Send e-mail to talk [at] alaskapublic [dot] org (comments may be read on air)
  • Call 550-8422 in Anchorage or 1-800-478-8255 if you’re outside Anchorage during the live broadcast
LIVE Broadcast: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. on APRN stations statewide.
SUBSCRIBE: Get Talk of Alaska updates automatically by e-mailRSS or podcast.



By Staff  on 2 November 2013 for Canadian Broadcasting Corporation  -
(http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/radiation-from-japan-nuclear-plant-arrives-on-alaska-coast-1.2335668)

Scientists at the University of Alaska are concerned about radiation leaking from Japan's damaged Fukushima nuclear plant, and the lack of a monitoring plan.

Some radiation has arrived in northern Alaska and along the west coast. That's raised concern over contamination of fish and wildlife. More may be heading toward coastal communities like Haines and Skagway.

Douglas Dasher, a researcher at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, says radiation levels in Alaskan waters could reach Cold War levels.

"The levels they are projecting in some of the models are in the ballpark of what they saw in the North Pacific in the 1960s," he said.

John Kelley, a professor emeritus at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, says he's not sure contamination will reach dangerous levels for humans but says without better data, who will know?

"The data they will need is not only past data but current data, and if no one is sampling anything then we won't really know it, will we?

"The general concern was, is the food supply safe? And I don't think anyone can really answer that definitively."

He says much of the monitoring is being done pro bono by universities, NGOs and state organizations.

See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: Alaska woulf rather go fishing 1/24/14

.

Davos 44th World Economic Forum

SUBHEAD: Corporate Criminals, Billionaires and Banksters gather for World Economic Forum in Switzerland.

By Andre Damon on 23 January 2014 for World Socialists -
(http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/01/23/davo-j23.html)


Image above: The new 44th WEF conference site is the InterContinental Hotel (CIA operated)  is seen through barbwire.  The theme  “The Reshaping of the World: Consequences for Society (bad), Politics (ugly) and Business (good)”. From (www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/survey-finds-ceos-more-confident-on-global-economy/2014/01/21/c92015b6-82c4-11e3-a273-6ffd9cf9f4ba_story.html).

The 44th annual World Economic Forum (WEF) began Wednesday, bringing over 2,000 corporate executives, major investors, government leaders, central bankers and celebrities to the Swiss Alpine resort of Davos.

The annual celebration of wealth and avarice follows a bumper year for the world’s super-rich. Stock prices and corporate profits surged to new record highs, swelling the bank accounts and portfolios of the financial elite, even as austerity measures, wage cutting and layoffs slashed living standards and threw tens of millions more people into poverty.

On the eve of the forum, the British charity Oxfam released a study documenting the staggering growth of social inequality. Oxfam reported that the richest 85 individuals possess more wealth than the poorest 50 percent of the world’s population—3.5 billion people!

The Davos conference embodies the emergence of a new global financial aristocracy. In attendance at this year’s meeting are 80 billionaires and hundreds of millionaires.

The general tone on the opening day was one of “fragile optimism,” according to a survey of attendees. There is a general expectation of more good fortune in 2014. But looming over the festivities there is also fear of the social and political consequences of the naked plundering of society by the elites represented in Davos.

The conference, which goes from January 22 through 25, has officially adopted the title “The Reshaping of the World: Consequences for Society, Politics and Business.” It will draw 1,500 business executives, 48 prime ministers and presidents, and the heads of twenty central banks. US attendees include Secretary of State John Kerry, Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker, Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew and Environmental Protection Agency head Gina McCarthy.

Panel discussions on topics such as “Regulating Innovation,” “Closing Europe’s Competitiveness Gap,” “Higher Education—Investment or Waste?” and “Immigration—Welcome or Not?” are sandwiched between galas and parties for the rich and powerful. As the Washington Post quipped, “After absorbing so much info during the day, evenings are your usual party scene, devoted to celebrity-spotting, night skiing and such, and apparently a fair amount of alcohol consumption.”

Davos’ prestigious Belvedere Hotel alone has ordered 1,594 bottles of champagne and Prosecco, as well as 3,088 bottles of red and white wine, according to the BBC, in order to accommodate “320 parties in five days, its 126 rooms crammed with chief executives, prime ministers and presidents.”

The attendees have reason to celebrate. The wealthiest 300 people on the planet saw their net worth grow by $524 billion over the last year, according to Bloomberg News. The Bloomberg article, entitled “Davos Billionaires See Wealth Gains on 2014 Stocks Rally,” noted that Bill Gates was last year’s biggest gainer, having increased his fortune by $15.8 billion to $78.5 billion, recapturing the position of world’s richest person.

The conference was founded in 1971 by German business professor Klaus Schwab, who invited hundreds of corporate executives throughout Europe to what he called the “European Management Forum.” But the event, whose name was changed to World Economic Forum in 1987, came into its own in the first period of political reaction under Reagan and Thatcher, growing in tandem with the redistribution of wealth from the bottom to the top.

Among the hundreds of corporate executives at Davos are substantial delegations from banks whose speculative and fraudulent activities triggered the 2008 financial crisis. Goldman Sachs sent eight delegates (including CEO Lloyd Blankfein), Citigroup and HSBC sent seven apiece, and JPMorgan Chase sent six, including CEO Jamie Dimon.

Panelists at a Wednesday forum entitled “Is the International Financial System Safer Now than it was Five Years Ago?” included HSBC Chairman Douglas Flint and Barclays CEO Anthony Jenkins. Barclays paid regulators $450 million in 2012 to settle charges that it illegally manipulated the world’s main interest rate, the London Interbank Lending Rate, or Libor. HSBC paid $500 million to regulators to settle similar allegations and hundreds of millions more to settle charges of drug money laundering.

In its annual “Global Risks” report, the forum listed income disparity as the number one threat, warning that it was the risk “most likely to cause serious damage globally in the coming decade.” WEF chief economist Jennifer Blanke, pointing to the 2011 upheavals in Egypt and Tunisia, commented, “Disgruntlement can lead to the dissolution of the fabric of society, especially if young people feel they don’t have a future.”

International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde struck a similar note in an interview with the Financial Times, warning that rising economic inequality “is not a recipe for stability and sustainability.” Pope Francis issued a similar warning.

No one at the conference, however, is proposing any social reforms to ameliorate the plight of the working class or redistribute wealth downwards from the top. On the contrary, the watchword is “structural reform,” a euphemism for stripping workers of all protections, dismantling what remains of the welfare state, and removing all environmental and health and safety rules that restrict corporate profit.

A survey of 1,344 business executives at the forum by PricewaterhouseCoopers concluded that the top concerns were corporate “over-regulation” and government deficits (i.e., social spending). Seventy two percent of the executives said overregulation was an impediment to economic growth, while 71 percent complained of “excessive” social spending and government debt.
.

Energy Descent Scenarios

SUBHEAD: This is Part 2 of Holmgren's new essay Crash on Demand: Welcome to the Brown Tech Future.

By David Holmgren on 24 January 2014 for Resilence -
(http://www.resilience.org/stories/2014-01-24/crash-on-demand-energy-descent-scenarios)

http://www.islandbreath.org/2014Year/01/140124gaiabig.jpg
Image above: Painting of Gaia by Alex Gray, 1989 showing naturaland industrial world. From (http://alexgrey.com/art/paintings/soul/gaia/).Click to embiggen.

Is time running out for powerdown?

Many climate policy professionals and climate activists are now reassessing whether there is anything more they can do to help prevent the global catastrophe that climate change appears to be.

The passing of the symbolic 400ppm CO2 level certainly has seen some prominent activists getting close to a change of strategy. As the Transition Town movement founder and permaculture activist Rob Hopkins says, the shift in the mainstream policy circles from mitigation to adaptation and defence is underway (i.e. giving up).[1]

While political deadlock remains the most obvious obstacle, I believe at least some of that deadlock stems from widespread doubt about whether greenhouse gas emissions can be radically reduced without economic contraction and/or substantial wealth redistribution. Substantial redistribution of wealth is not generally taken seriously perhaps because it could only come about through some sort of global revolution that would itself lead to global economic collapse. On the other hand, massive economic contraction seems like it might happen all by itself, without necessarily leading to greater equity.

The predominant focus in the “climate professional and activist community” on policies, plans and projects for transition to renewable energy and efficiency has yet to show evidence of absolute reductions in greenhouse gas emissions that do not depend on rising greenhouse gas emissions in other parts of the global economy.

For example, the contribution of renewable technology installation to reduced GGE in some European countries appears to be balanced by increased GGE in China and India (where much of the renewable technologies are manufactured).

The Jevons’ paradox[2] suggests than any gains in efficiency or tapping of new sources of energy will simply expand total consumption rather than reduce consumption of resources (and therefore GGE).

Richard Eckersley in his article ‘Deficit Deeper Than Economy’ identifies the improbability of ever decoupling economic growth from resource depletion and green house gas emissions. He states “Australia's material footprint, the total amount of primary resources required to service domestic consumption (excludes exports and includes imports) was 35 tonnes per person in 2008, the highest among the 186 countries studied. Every 10 per cent increase in gross domestic product increases the average national material footprint by 6 per cent.

By 2050, a global population of 9 billion people would require an estimated 270 billion tonnes of natural resources to fuel the level of consumption of OECD countries, compared with the 70 billion tonnes consumed in 2010.”[3]

Time seems to be running out for any serious planned reductions in GGE adequate to prevent dangerous climate change without considering a powerdown of the growth economy.

The ideas of degrowth[4] are starting to get an airing, mostly in Europe, but the chances of these ideas being adopted and successfully implemented would require a long slow political evolution if not revolution. We don’t have time for the first, and the second almost certainly crashes the financial system, which in turn crashes the global economy.

Is time running out for bottom up alternatives?

Like many others, I have argued that the bottom up creation of household and community economies, already proliferating in the shadow of the global economy, can create and sustain different ways of well-being that can compensate, at least partly, for the inevitable contraction in centralised fossil fuelled economies (now well and truly failing to sustain the social contract in countries such as Greece and Egypt).

When the official Soviet Union economy collapsed in the early ‘90s it was the informal economy that cushioned the social impact. Permaculture strategies focus on the provision of basic needs at the household and community level to increase resilience, reduce ecological footprint and allow much of the discretionary economy to shrink. In principle, a major contraction in energy consumption is possible because a large proportion of that consumption is for non-essential uses by more than a billion middle class people.

That contraction has the potential to switch off greenhouse gas emissions but this has not been seriously discussed or debated by those currently working very hard to get global action for rapid transition by planned and co-ordinated processes. Of course it is more complicated because the provision of fundamental needs, such as water, food etc., are part of the same highly integrated system that meets discretionary wants.

However, the time available to create, refine and rapidly spread successful models of these bottom-up solutions is running out, in the same way that the time for government policy and corporate capitalism to work their magic in converting the energy base of growth from fossil to renewable sources.[5] If the climate clock is really so close to midnight what else could be done?

Economic crash as hell or salvation

For many decades I have felt that a collapse of the global economic systems might save humanity and many of our fellow species great suffering by happening sooner rather than later because the stakes keep rising and scale of the impacts are always worse by being postponed.

 An important influence in my thinking on the chances of such a collapse was the public speech given by President Ronald Reagan following the 1987 stock market crash.

He said “there won’t be an economic collapse, so long as people don’t believe there will be an economic collapse” or words to that effect. I remember at the time thinking; fancy the most powerful person on the planet admitting that faith (of the populace) is the only thing that holds the financial system together.

Two decades on I remember thinking that a second great depression might be the best outcome we could hope for. The pain and suffering that has happened since 2007 (from the more limited “great recession”) is more a result of the ability of the existing power structures to maintain control and enforce harsh circumstances by handing the empty bag to the public, than any fundamental lack of resources to provide all with basic needs.

 Is the commitment to perpetual growth in wealth for the richest the only way that everyone else can hope to get their needs met? The economy is simply not structured to provide all with their basic needs. That growth economy is certainly coming to an end; but will it slowly grind to a halt or collapse more rapidly?

The fact that the market price for carbon emissions has fallen so low in Europe is a direct result of stagnating growth. Past economic recessions and more serious economic collapses, such as faced by the Soviet Union after its oil production peaked in the late 1980’s,[6] show how greenhouse gas emissions can and have been reduced, then stabilizing at lower levels once the economy stabilized without any planned intention to do so.

The large number of oil exporters that have more recently peaked has provided many case studies to show the correlation with political upheaval, economic contraction and reductions in GGE. Similarly many of the countries that have suffered the greatest economic contraction are also those with the greatest dependence on imported energy, such as Ireland, Greece and Portugal.

The so-called Arab Spring, especially in Egypt, followed high food and energy prices driven by collapsed oil revenues and inability to maintain subsidies. The radical changes of government in Egypt have not been able to arrest the further contraction of the economy.

The effects of peak oil and climate change have combined with geopolitical struggles over pipeline routes to all but destroy the Syrian economy and society.[7]

Slow Contraction or Fast Collapse

The fragility of the global economy has many unprecedented aspects that make some sort of rapid collapse of the global economy more likely. The capacity of central banks to repeat the massive stimulus mechanism in response to the 2008 global financial crisis, has been greatly reduced, while the faith that underpins the global financial system has weakened, to say the least.

 Systems thinkers such as David Korowicz[8] have argued that the inter-connected nature of the global economy, instantaneous communications and financial flows, “just in time” logistics, and extreme degrees of economic and technological specialisation, have increased the chances of a large scale systemic failure, at the same time that they have mitigated (or at least reduced) the impact of more limited localised crises.

Whether novel factors such as information technology, global peak oil and climate change have increased the likelihood of more extreme economic collapse, Foss and Keen have convinced me that the most powerful and fast-acting factor that could radically reduce greenhouse gas emissions is the scale of financial debt and the long-sustained growth of bubble economics stretching back at least to the beginnings of the “Thatcherite/Reaganite revolution” in the early 1980s.

 From an energetics perspective, the peak of US oil production in 1970, and the resulting global oil crises of 73 and 79, laid the foundations for the gigantic growth in debt that super accelerated the level of consumption, and therefore GGE.

Whatever the causes, all economic bubbles follow a trajectory that includes a rapid contraction, as credit evaporates, followed by a long-sustained contraction, where asset values decline to lower levels than those at the beginning of the bubble.

After almost 25 years of asset price deflation in Japan, a house and land parcel of 1.5ha in a not too isolated rural location can be bought for $25,000. A contraction in the systems that supply wants are likely to see simultaneous problems in the provision of basic needs. As Foss explains, in a deflationary contraction, prices of luxuries generally collapse but essentials of food and fuel do not fall much.

Most importantly, essentials become unaffordable for many, once credit freezes and job security declines. It goes without saying that deflation rather inflation is the economic devil that governments and central banks most fear and are prepared to do almost anything to avoid.

Giving credence to the evidence for fast global economic collapse may suggest I am moving away from my belief in the more gradual Energy Descent future that I helped articulate. John Michael Greer has been very critical of apocalyptic views of the future in which a collapse sweeps away the current world leaving the chosen few who survive to build the new world.

In large measure I agree with his critique but recognise that some might interpret my work as suggesting a permaculture paradise growing from the ashes of this civilisation. To some extent this is a reasonable interpretation, but I see that collapse, as a long drawn-out process rather than resulting from a single event.[9]

I still believe that energy descent will go on for many decades or even centuries. In Future Scenarios I suggested energy descent driven by climate change and peak oil could occur through a series of crises separating relatively stable states that could persist for decades if not centuries.

The collapse of the global financial system might simply be the first of those crises that reorganise the world. The pathways that energy descent could take are enormously varied, but still little discussed, so it is not surprising that discussions about descent scenarios tend to default into ones of total collapse.

As the language around energy descent and collapse has become more nuanced, we start to see the distinction between financial, economic, social and civilisational collapse as potential stages in an energy descent process where the first is fast changing and relatively superficial and the last is slow moving and more fundamental.

http://www.islandbreath.org/2014Year/01/140124descentbig.jpg
Image above: Chart of Energy Descent Pathways by David Holmgren redrawn by Juan Wilson. Click to embiggen.

In Future Scenarios I suggested the more extreme scenarios of Earth Steward and Lifeboat could follow Green Tech and Brown Tech along the stepwise energy descent pathway.

If we are heading into the Brown Tech world of more severe climate change, then as the energy sources that sustain the Brown Tech scenario deplete, and climate chaos increases, future crises and collapse could lead to the Lifeboat Scenario.

In this scenario, no matter how fast or extreme the reductions in GGE due to economic collapse, we still end up in the climate cooker, but with only the capacity for very local, household and communitarian organisation.

If the climate crisis is already happening, and as suggested in Future Scenarios, the primary responses to the crisis increase rather than reduce GGE, then it is probably too late for any concerted effort to shift course to the more benign Green Tech energy descent future.

Given that most of the world is yet to accept the inevitability of Energy Descent and are still pinning their faith in “Techno Stability” if not “Techno Explosion”, the globally cooperative powerdown processes needed to shift the world to Green Tech look unlikely.

More fundamental than any political action, the resurgent rural and regional economies, based on a boom for agricultural and forestry commodities, that structurally underpins the Green Tech scenario, will not eventuate if climate change is fast and severe. Climate change will stimulate large investments in agriculture but they are more likely to be energy and resource intensive, controlled climate agriculture (greenhouses), centralised at transport hubs.

 This type of development simply reinforces the Brown Tech model including the acceleration of GGE.

While it may be too late for the Green Tech Scenario, it still may be possible to avoid more extreme climate change of a long drawn out Brown Tech Scenario before natural forcing factors lock humanity into the climate cooker of 4-6 degrees and resource depletion leads to a collapse of the centralised Brown Tech governance and a rise of local war lords (Lifeboat Scenario).

The novel structural vulnerabilities highlighted by David Korowicz, and the unprecedented extremity of the bubble economics highlighted by Nicole Foss suggest the strong tendencies towards a Brown Tech world could be short lived.

 Instead, severe global economic and societal collapse could switch off GGE enough to begin reversing climate change; in essence the Earth Steward scenario of recreated bioregional economies based on frugal agrarian resources and abundant salvage from the collapsed global economy and defunct national governance structures.

See also:
Ea O Ka Aina: Crash on Demand 12/30/13
Ea O Ka Aina: Response to Holmgren's scenarios 1/1/14
Ea O Ka Aina: Response to Holmgren's scenarios 1/10/14

[1] See  Why I’m marking passing 400ppm by getting back on an aeroplane by Rob Hopkins published on Transition Culture on 16 May, 2013
http://transitionculture.org/2013/05/16/why-im-marking-passing-400-ppm-by-getting-back-on-an-aeroplane/

[2] During the early stages of the industrial revolution English economist William Stanley Jevons noticed that a doubling in the efficiency of steam engine technology led to an increase rather than a halving of coal consumption as businesses found more uses for the available power. See the Coal Question (1865).

[3] See Deficit Deeper Than Economy http://www.canberratimes.com.au/federal-politics/political-opinion/deficit-deeper-than-economy-20130929-2umd3.html#ixzz2js46nGBp

[4] See Wikipedia article for overview of movement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degrowth

[5] Of course true believers in global capitalism’s capacity to reduce GGE in time, still abound. See for example Christian Parenti’s piece from Dissent, reposted at Resilience.org, which is amusingly titled A Radical Approach to the Climate Crisis which is actually a plea for activists to forget trying to reform, let alone build systems based on sustainability principles, in favour of getting behind the power of corporations and governments to make big changes quickly (to get GGE falling fast enough).

[6] See for example, Peak oil and the fall of the Soviet Union by Douglas B. Reynolds on The Oil Drum.

[7] See Guardian article by Nafeez Ahmed.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/earth-insight/2013/may/13/1?INTCMP=SRCH

[8] See Trade-Off, Metis Risk Consulting & Feasta, 2012 http://www.feasta.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Trade-Off1.pdf

[9] leaving aside the issue of whether the energy descent future will be a permaculture paradise or not.

Acknowledgements
Thanks to Rick Tanaka, Maureen Corbett and Daryl Taylor for comments and corrections

.