Showing posts with label Emotion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Emotion. Show all posts

Brett Kavanaugh's facial clues

SUBHEAD: His smile is a grimace and his other expressions are those of someone in constant misery.

By Juan Wilson on 29 November 2018 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2018/09/brett-kavanaughs-facial-clues.html)


Image above: Brett Kavanaugh attempting to present a pleasant smile during the Senate Judiciary Hearing on 11/28/18 for a Supreme Court Justice nomination. It is something that does not come naturally. Back when I was in High School we called this a "shit eating grin".

I have spent too much time recently listening to and seeing the face of Brett Kavanaugh. It's an ugly sensory experience. I say this because besides the ugly fascist and misogynist ideas embedded in his jurisprudence, he appears to be a bitter and unhappy man with some bad habits like drinking, gambling and womanizing.

I'm reminded of "Bret Maverick". Bret Maverick was a popular television show on ABC-TV from 1957 until 1962 (approximately my high school years). Bret Maverick was a western hero during a time when TV westerns were the main staple of night time TV.

Unlike the cowboys and sheriffs that made up the bulk of these protagonists Bret was a "bad boy". He was a Mississippi riverboat con artist. He gambled, drank and womanized when he wasn't dispensing justice to the "bad guys". Sound familiar?

Brett Kavanaugh was conceived and born not long after the show stopped production. Did his father name him after the TV show idol? Seems possible.

If not, it is still possible that current day Brett took some misinterpreted cues from a 1960's fictional hero - namely the drinking, gambling and womanizing.

The Bret Maverick character was played by the laid back, affable, quick to smile James Garner. And smiling and being laid back seems out of Brett Kavanhaugh's repertoire.


Image above: James Garner in publicity photo as Bret Maverick. From (https://www.metv.com/lists/10-things-you-never-knew-about-maverick).

Almost all of the photographs and video of Brett Kavanaugh that I have seen do not show a pleasant expression on his face. His smile seems like something of a pattern of muscle maneuvers he has memorized to appear "happy". The rest of the facial expressions I see span a range of emotions from misery, to fear and loathing, to disgust and rage.

His demeanor at Georgetown Prep and Yale University was that of a goody-two-shoes and nasty frat boy. He seems strapped on a treadmill he despises.  Definitely a scary dude. 


Image above: Brett Kavanaugh at the Senate Judiciary Hearing on 11/28/18 for a Supreme Court Justice nomination. Never a pleasant, calm expressoion -but one of pain or revulsion.


Image above: Brett Kavanaugh at the Senate Judiciary Hearing on 11/28/18 for a Supreme Court Justice nomination. The man seems to be hiding a deep unhappiness or sadness.


Image above: Brett Kavanaugh at the Senate Judiciary Hearing on 11/28/18 for a Supreme Court Justice nomination. He is capable of irrational visciousness.

I'd rather have James Garner named to the US Supreme Court - even though he has been dead since 2014. 
.

Object Permanence

SUBHEAD: I brush a lock of hair from my face and catch the scent of the garden still on my fingertips.

By Jaclyn Moyer on 1 April 2017 for Orion Magazine -
(https://orionmagazine.org/article/object-permanence/)


Image above: Artist Ian Strange deconstructs buildings damaged in 2011 earthquake in suburbs of Christ's Church, New Zealand. This piece is titled "untitled house 3".  From (https://www.designboom.com/art/ian-strange-deconstructs-homes-in-christchurch-for-final-act-01-24-2014/gallery/image/ian-strange-final-act-designboom-11/).

After four years of farming vegetables in the foothills of Northern California, my partner, our nine-month-old daughter, and I left our farm for a salaried job and a rented house in Austin, Texas.

My first morning in the city I surveyed our backyard—a garage-sized rectangle thick with chickweed, an unruly patch of cactus, three leafless trees—then headed to the store to stock our empty kitchen. In the produce section, I floundered in choice.

Accustomed to constructing meals with vegetables from our farm, I circled pyramids of tomatoes, stacks of cauliflower. I lifted a bundle of kale, but the leaves were floppy and yellowed. I reached instead for broccoli, the stalk a shade closer to white than green, the flowers dry.

At the checkout line stood a rack of seeds. I slipped two packets into my cart: Georgia Collards and Ruby Red Chard.

That night, I hardly slept. Though my daughter had slept fine at the farm, in Austin she woke every few hours. Night after night, in the dark that wasn’t dark at all but aglow with the light of street lamps, I rocked her, rubbed her back, murmured lullabies.

Separation anxiety, I read, often caused sleep trouble in babies my daughter’s age as they developed “object permanence”—the understanding that things continue to exist even when they can’t be observed.

When my daughter woke to find herself alone, the theory explained, she was less content to fall back asleep because she now understood that something was missing; something she loved existed out in the world but she couldn’t see it, couldn’t touch it.

A friend suggested I place a piece of my clothing in the crib. “Sometimes the mother’s scent can be enough comfort,” she said. I unwound a shawl from my neck and spread it across my daughter’s mattress.

Our rented house was nice in ways I wasn’t used to: it had good insulation, double-paned windows, a dishwasher. No rats hid in the walls, no hornets under the eaves. There was also no woodstove. Instead of building a fire each morning, I turned on the heater with my iPhone.

Without produce to harvest or eggs to collect, without kindling to cut or rows of lavender to prune, I began to feel like just a guest in this life, wandering the grounds of some hotel. I felt severed from the world, as though I were wilting—I felt like the store-bought-broccoli version of myself.

A month passed and my seedlings began to outgrow their pots. I set my daughter on a quilt in the backyard and started to dig, forming long mounded beds. I dug all afternoon, cultivating as much of the yard as I could, not sure what I’d do when there was no space left to dig.

That evening, a siren neared and I waited for the sound to wake my daughter. The ambulance came within a block, but she didn’t stir. I tiptoed to her crib, leaned in to feel her breath on my cheek, and suddenly I wished she’d cry.

Brake lights poured through the curtains, and in the murky light I realized my fear wasn’t that city life would continue to grate, to feel foreign. I wasn’t afraid that my family and I would never feel comfortable in Austin but that—soon enough—we would.

It’s been two months now and my daughter, at last, sleeps all night. I wonder if her separation anxiety is abating. Perhaps she’s learning how to be apart from the things she loves, how to trust in their return.

In our backyard, my seedlings grow. I spend an afternoon weeding, working my fingers through each row until the soil settles deep into the creases of my palms.

That night in bed, I brush a lock of hair from my face and catch the scent of the garden still on my fingertips: tang of grass, musk of loam. I cup my face in my palm, press my nose into the skin, and fall asleep.

• Jaclyn Moyer’s work has appeared in The Normal School, Salon, High Country News, and other journals. She lives in the foothills of Northern California with her partner and two-year-old daughter

.

Trump's lazy lack of interest

SUBHEAD: Trump, America's Boy King, should know golf and television won't make America great again.

By Lee Moran on 4 August 2017 for Huffington Post -
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/newsweek-cover-donald-trump_us_598418d1e4b041356ebef616)


Image above: Cover of Newsweek illustrates Trump's Lazyboy lifestyle labeled "Donald Trump is bored and tired. Imagine how bad he'd feel if he did any work." From (http://www.newsweek.com/2017/08/11/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-gop-white-house-potus-bannon-643996.html).

“I would have added past due bills on floor...”

President Donald Trump won’t want to hang this uncomplimentary magazine cover at any of his golf clubs.

Newsweek depicted the president as a junk food-eating television addict on the front of its next issue, dated Aug. 11.

Under the headline “LAZY BOY,” the edited photo shows Trump slumped in a recliner with a remote control in one hand and a Diet Coke in the other.

An open bag of Cheetos is perched on his lap while an empty McDonald’s hamburger carton is discarded on the floor.

“Donald Trump is bored and tired,” the sub-headline reads. “Imagine how bad he’d feel if he did any work.”

Newsweek shared the cover on its home page late Thursday, two days after it published the cover story itself, which examined “America’s boy king” and his apparent lack of enthusiasm for the job.

The image went viral, sparking a myriad of responses.


Image above: Could Trump be afraid? From (http://www.newsweek.com/2017/08/11/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-gop-white-house-potus-bannon-643996.html).


.

Young men and imaginary worlds

SUBHEAD: For many men the gaming universe is more enjoyable than the real world.

By Mike Shedlock on 17 July 2017 for Mish Talk -
(https://mishtalk.com/2017/07/17/another-reason-men-dont-work-imaginary-world-more-enjoyable-than-the-real-world/)


Image above: Detail if illustration of the hero characters from the top 70 video games of all time. From (http://www.slayerment.com/top-video-game-songs-all-time).

President Trump, like President Obama before him, point out the low unemployment rate as a measure of success.

What they don’t point out are masses of people on welfare via fraudulent disabilities, people in school wasting money in dead-end retraining exercises, people who have simply given up looking for a job, and people in forced retirement needing Social Security payments to survive.

A team of researchers from Princeton, the University of Chicago, and the University of Rochester discusses another class of individuals who are not working but are not counted as unemployed: People, primarily young men who are addicted to games. For such individuals, games provide a fantasy world that is far more enjoyable than the real world.


Please consider their report on Leisure Luxuries and the Labor Supply of Young Men.
Between 2000 and 2015, market hours worked fell by 203 hours per year (12 percent) for younger men ages 21-30, compared to a decline of 163 hours per year (8 percent) for men ages 31-55.

These declines started prior to the Great Recession, accelerated sharply during the recession, and have rebounded only modestly since. We use a variety of data sources to document that the hours decline was particularly pronounced for younger men.

Not only have hours fallen, but there is a large and growing segment of this population that appears detached from the labor market: 15 percent of younger men, excluding full-time students, worked zero weeks over the prior year as of 2016. The comparable number in 2000 was only 8 percent.

A natural question is how these younger men support themselves given their decline in earnings. We document that 67 percent of non-employed younger men lived with a parent or close relative in 2015, compared to 46 percent in 2000.

One avenue to gauge how younger men perceive their fortunes is to use survey data on happiness. In this spirit, we complement the patterns in hours, wages, and consumption with data on life satisfaction from the General Social Survey.

We find that younger men reported increased happiness during the 2000s, despite stagnant wages, declining employment rates and increased propensity to live with parents/relatives. This contrasts sharply with older men, whose satisfaction clearly fell, tracking their decline in employment.

See also:

 http://www.theonion.com/video/warcraft-sequel-lets-gamers-play-a-character-playi-14240



Island Breath: Man's Nintendo Memories 6/14/08
Island Breath: California imitates GTA 10/25/07
Island Breath: Virtual World & Apocalypse 12/19/05
.

Growing my way out of Dystopia

SUBHEAD: Can we stop feeling so helpless and hopeless about a world on the skids by growing food.

By Frida Berrigan on 11 July 2017 for TomDispatch -
(http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/176305/)


Image above: World War One era patriotic poster. "Uncle Sam says; Garden to cut food costs." From original article.

In the wake of Donald Trump’s inauguration, George Orwell’s 1984 soared onto bestseller lists, as did Sinclair Lewis’s It Can’t Happen Here and Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, which also hit TV screens in a storm of publicity.

Zombies, fascists, and predators of every sort are now stalking the American imagination in ever-greater numbers and no wonder, given that guy in the Oval Office.

Certainly, 2017 is already offering up a bumper crop of dystopian possibilities and we’ve only reached July. But let me admit one thing: the grim national mood and the dark clouds crowding our skies have actually nudged me in a remarkably positive direction. Surprise of all surprises, Donald Trump is making the corn grow in Connecticut!

Maybe I'd better explain.

My kids and I planted corn seeds in a square bed in our front yard this spring. Really, they just dumped the kernels in the ground and stared expectantly, waiting for them to grow. Three hundred corn plants seemed to germinate overnight, crowding each other out as they worked to reach the sun.

I’ve been steadily thinning the clumps into rows and now we have a neat line of a dozen or so corn plants, each just about three feet high, along with lettuce, kale, collards, peas, basil, and a few tomato plants in a four foot by four foot raised bed. The kids -- Madeline, three, and Seamus, four -- visit “their” corn plants, name them, argue over whose are whose, and generally delight in their bona fides as Connecticut corn growers.

It’s all part of a (somewhat incoherent) plan of mine that’s turned most of our front yard over to vegetables this year, including more tomatoes sprouting beside that raised bed along with plenty of cilantro. We have a fig tree, too, and apple trees, blueberry bushes, even a Shinto plum in back of the house along with a little potato patch and more herbs of various sorts. It’s a fertile little urban oasis.

For water supplies, I went as far as to install rain barrels at our downspouts, which tend to quickly fill to the brim whenever we get a half-decent rain and then cause moisture problems in the basement as water begins to gush out of their mosquito-proof tops.

I worry about those barrels whenever I go away, but also feel a strange pride when I water my vegetable patches from them instead of the hose.

If I stop to think about it, however, they drive home the point even better than a haphazard row of jaunty corn: I have no idea what I’m doing.

That’s not the end of the world, though, is it? This spring, as the political scene turned from truly bad to criminally bad, I began to see how not knowing what you’re doing could be a legitimate path, if not to power, then to resistance -- and therapeutic as well.

Seriously, it was therapeutic to dig and plant, weed and water. It was healing to do that with my kids, to hear them teaching each other about a world of growing things, to watch them go from grossed out to awed by worms and beetles, to see them bend their noses almost to the earth to follow the wiggly movements of such creatures.

We’re now picking peas from plants that grew from seeds Seamus planted in little cups at the end of his school year.

Every time we come home, he says, “Daddy, look at how tall my peas are!” and he runs over to trace their curly tendrils as they climb the twines we tied.

It’s Pretty, But Can We Eat It? Stalking Self-Sufficiency
Sometimes, when the dystopian possibilities of our world sink in, I think about the importance of self-sufficiency.

Still, to be perfectly honest, given the costs of the rain barrels and the lumber for those raised beds, given my time and effort and ignorance, we may be growing some of the world’s most expensive peas, tomatoes, and kale. And it’s not like we have to wait for the kids’ corn to grow (and cure) to make popcorn.

We do, however, make a lot of our own food. We bake sourdough bread from a pungent starter kept in the fridge. We ferment our own yogurt and stir up batches of granola every few weeks. It’s fun. It’s work our whole family gets into.

It helps teach our kids what real food tastes like -- that yogurt doesn’t come naturally in a plastic tub loaded with sugar and fruit on the bottom; that bread can emerge from the oven hot and chewy and is best eaten at that moment slathered in butter.

Like all but a microscopic number of Americans, however, no matter how we toil in our spare time, most of our food doesn’t come from anywhere nearby, thanks to the wonders of the global transportation system and the work of exploited laborers in distant fields and orchards.

My kids eat berries all year round, not just in those wondrous brief windows when our little strawberry patch produces and our blueberry bushes bend with their weight of blue orbs.

The pecans for our granola are a product of the U.S.A. -- so says the bag without specifying where exactly the trees grew in these 50 nifty states of ours -- and are certified kosher.  The flour for our bread holds the same secrets. Where did that wheat grow?

We live in New London, Connecticut, a small city in a small state.  Throughout the summer months, you can go full bore locavore and feed your family Connecticut-grown milk, eggs, fruit, vegetables, beef, and pork, serve local wine, and all sorts of locally caught or raised seafood.

No bananas or chocolate or coffee of course, but the bounty of our state has inspired food producers, professors, and policy people to promote New England as a “food shed” potentially capable of growing, processing, and distributing enough stuff to essentially feed itself. It’s a goal of such types to locally produce 50% of all food distributed within

New England by 2060, thanks to programs to promote the retention of family farmland, an expansion of urban gardening, and a generational effort at education. Right now, however, 90% of our food is grown outside both the state and New England.

You might be wondering at this point whether such an agrarian vision isn’t both utopian and utterly retro.  After all, why worry about locally grown food when we can Fresh Direct asparagus in November?

You Never Know...
I work part-time for a small nonprofit that builds and manages community gardens. It employs (and hopefully empowers) young people to do the physical labor and community improvement work of growing food in and for our urban center.

As we were organizing a new community garden in a poor and isolated part of our small city recently, a woman told me that she was excited about growing her own food because “you never know when they are going to stop shipping food in here.”

Over-the-top paranoid? Maybe. But it rang a bell of worry with me. Yes, the planet is changing radically and an erratic and vengeful man in the Oval Office eggs it on.  Donald Trump now being the boss of the largest nuclear arsenal on the planet puts a new spin on the phrase “You’re fired!”

So, the thought that we might be left to fend for ourselves in New London seems less than paranoid these days -- but of course maybe I’m just paranoid!

History shows that empires fall, that money can suddenly lose its value (think of the Weimar Republic just before the rise of Adolf Hitler), that promises can be broken, and treaties trampled, that rain can suddenly stop falling, and madmen can consolidate power, and it may someday show that martial law can be declared by tweet.

Who, in fact, knows what can happen on our extreme planet, which means that we need to learn how to do things, make things, grow things, fix things ourselves instead of assuming that others will continue to do all of it for us. I need to learn how. My kids need to learn how. Enough at least to do our best to take care of ourselves and our neighbors.

Write all of this off as my overactive imagination, if you wish -- fed by works like Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower or Cormac McCarthy’s The Road -- but my own lack of self-sufficiency has been on my mind for a while.

And on that score, I do have cause for alarm. With luck we won't have to fend off the zombies or defend our turf from some future well-armed local militia, but as of now we can barely protect our blueberries from the birds or our lettuce from the grubs.

My front-yard garden is modest and haphazard at best, but working on it does make me notice and admire the other front-yard gardeners in my neighborhood. A woman up the street has an amazingly impressive crop of tomatoes and string beans coming in. Two streets over, someone built hoop houses in their front yard and grew greens of various sorts all winter long.

When I pluck my own kale leaves and feel connected to the larger urban farming community, all of us eating something out of our own yards, I’m sometimes reminded of the Victory Gardens of the World War II era.

Back then as a practical response to war-induced scarcities and to a massive and sophisticated propaganda campaign, Americans dug up their lawns in staggering numbers and put in gardens, turning the clock back briefly on rapidly suburbanizing communities and industrializing lives.

For a few years, neighborhood farmers genuinely helped feed America.

Victory Gardens have their spot in the history of the home front in World War II, but I was surprised to learn recently that they actually date back to the First World War. In 1917 and 1918, Americans planted eight million gardens, producing food worth $875 million. In that era of war against Germany, those homefront farmers even renamed sauerkraut “liberty cabbage.”

Embedded in the propaganda of the time, however, was an early recognition that Americans had lost something real in the concrete jungles of the country’s cities and that it was still possible to reestablish a connection to the land and be producers again, no matter where you lived.

Victory Gardens and Zombies from Washington
When World War I ended, however, most Victory Gardeners put down their hoes and went back to buying food, not growing it -- until, that is, 12 days after the attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941, when the National Defense Gardening Conference revived the idea and everyone got back to work.

In those war years, many farmers were drafted and food and fuel were rationed. Meanwhile, the War Department’s propaganda machine launched a brilliant campaign to promote “Victory Gardens” to grow food for family consumption and canning for the winter months.

A poster of that time caught the mood of the moment perfectly: a suburban housewife, her arms full of lidded glass jars, her eyes wide with excitement or exasperation (or both), exclaims, “Of course I can! I’m patriotic as can be -- and the ration points won’t worry me.”

Victory Gardens enlisted women, children, the elderly, and the infirm in the war effort. Everyone had a role. In 1943, 20 million gardens produced 8 million tons of food; more than 40% of all the vegetables consumed in the nation.

That remains a phenomenal feat and it wasn’t just restricted to front and backyards. The city fathers of San Francisco turned over the lawn at City Hall to local farmers; the Boston Commons was quilted with gardens; and public land nationwide was hoed and rowed and made to produce.

Now, I dislike rank propaganda as much as the next person, but face it, Victory Gardens were cool!

And the posters appeal to so many traits we think of as inherently American: can-do-it-ness, self-sufficiency, hard work.

In those years, Rosie the Riveter was joined by Wendy the Weeder and Peggy the Planter and, miracle of all miracles, those Victory Gardens helped feed America just as they had in the previous world war. Not too long ago and a million years before the advent of the Internet, we did that. It’s possible again.

Start Feeding Hope
In the age of Trump, however, it’s so much easier to focus on what we can’t do and on what disastrous harm is being done to us and the country. We can’t build bridges, or get out of any of our wars, or scrub the insides of industry smokestacks, or even think about stopping those global waters from rising. But, if we put our minds (and hands) to it, we can still grow food, block by block, yard by yard, and feel a hell of a lot less dystopian in the bargain.

What would it be like to be mobilized by my government -- and I emphasize “my” because as far as I’m concerned, Donald Trump’s version of it doesn’t qualify -- into some collective effort to make this country a better place.

When we entered World War II, the United States rushed onto a war footing and, disastrously enough, in many ways it’s never gotten off it again -- except when it comes to the public.

We Americans were demobilized long ago when it comes to war, even as military spending headed for the heavens (or for hell on Earth) and the national security state became the defining branch of government. We, who are eternally to be kept “safe” by that militarized state are also eternally not to raise a hand when it comes either to the war “effort” or much else.

No Victory (or in this era, possibly, Defeat) Gardens for us.  Few of course could even name all the countries in which the U.S. military is at war these days, no less list the strategic or political goals behind our trillion-dollar conflicts. Many of us don’t know any active duty service members in our now “all-volunteer” military.

Our eyes tend to glaze over when we stumble on a war news story.
All our government has wanted from us in its war effort (and this has been totally bipartisan) is our complacency, our inattention, our distracted and ill-informed consent or at least passivity.

In exchange, our leaders regularly suggest to us that there’s no need for sacrifice or scarcity or hardship on our part.  We are, that is, to be prepared for nothing.

President Trump has put a new twist on this American compact. He’s ready to mobilize us, but only to render him our loyalty (whatever that may mean) and adoration. Giving him such loyalty these days is a growing white supremacy movement emboldened to emerge from the shadows and into the streets with its hate and violence on display.

The Trump presidency has certainly provoked disdain, disgust, mistrust, resistance, and protest -- but so far, not sustained, alternative, creative activity, the sort of things that would support this country literally and figuratively over the true long haul.

Still, Victory Gardens are alive and well, at least in Milwaukee.  There, the Victory Garden Initiative will come to your house (if you ask them and pay them) and install garden beds in your yard. In the Bay Area, a “gardener on a tricycle” will deliver your Victory Garden starter kit and build garden beds for you out of untreated redwood.

For those thinking about sustainability in tough times, you can find a dozen books that contemplate the concept.

I must admit that I haven’t yet gotten into the habit of calling our front yard a Victory Garden, but it is at least vibrant and vital. It already sustains me (and Madeline and Seamus) in tough times, even if it will be months before we can actually eat the few ears of corn our little patch produces, if the birds and bugs don’t feast on them first.

The kids want to have a corn party with our neighbors. It’s an idea that fills me with satisfaction, even if those ears won’t nourish us for more than a few minutes.

Still, our fleeting (and delicious) ability to feed one another might help us grow a bigger patch next year and face with a greater sense of self-assurance whatever zombies Washington sends our way.

• Frida Berrigan, a TomDispatch regular, writes the Little Insurrections blog for WagingNonviolence.org, is the author of It Runs In The Family: On Being Raised By Radicals and Growing Into Rebellious Motherhood, and lives in New London, Connecticut.

Donald Trump's mental health

SUBHEAD: Psychiatrists are expressing their concern about President Donald Trump's mental state.

By Cesar Chelela & Ornando Garci on 11 March 2017 for Common Dreams -
(http://www.commondreams.org/views/2017/03/11/barry-goldwater-donald-trump)


Image above: Illustration of Donald Trump and names of mental health issues. From origanal article.

Increasingly, members of the psychiatric profession are expressing their concern about President Donald Trump mental health status.

In a recent letter to the New York Times, two prestigious psychiatrists, Judith L. Herman and Robert Jay Lifton seriously question his grasp of reality and say, “Soon after the election, one of us raised concerns about Donald Trump’s fitness for office, based on the alarming symptoms of mental instability he had shown during his campaign.

Since then, this concern has grown. Even within the space of a few weeks, the demands of the presidency have magnified his erratic patterns of behavior.”

They are clear that they are not making a diagnosis but just expressing their concern, saying, “We are in no way offering a psychiatric diagnosis, which would be unwise to attempt from a distance. Nevertheless, as psychiatrists we feel obliged to express our alarm. We fear that when faced with a crisis, President Trump will lack the judgment to respond rationally.”

As a base for these carefully stated considerations is the Goldwater Rule. In 1964, the magazine Fact published the article “The Unconscious of a Conservative: A Special Issue on the Mind of Barry Goldwater.”

The article included the results of a poll among psychiatrists questioning them if then Senator Barry Goldwater was fit to be president. Of the 2,147 who responded, 657 said that he was fit and 1,189 said that he was not.

In addition to the responses to the question about Goldwater, the article included a series of quotations from the respondents, various facts and observations about Goldwater. Goldwater sued the editor-published of the magazine, Ralph Ginzburg, who had edited some of the quotations from articles and even from some of the psychiatrists interviewed.

Goldwater sued him and won $75,000 in damages, since the judge found that Ginzburg had acted with malicious intent.

Before the publication of the article, the medical director of the American Psychiatric Association had warned Ginzburg that the responses were not valid without a “thorough clinical examination” of Goldwater, according to Jonathan D. Moreno, an American philosopher and historian.

In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) made that policy official and established what became known as the “Goldwater Rule.”

The Rule, which appeared in the first edition of the APA’s code of ethics and is still in effect now, says:
“On occasion psychiatrists are asked for an opinion about an individual who is in the light of public attention or who has disclosed information about himself/herself through public media. In such circumstances, a psychiatrist may share with the public his or her expertise about psychiatric issues in general.

However, it is unethical for a psychiatrist to offer a professional opinion unless he or she has conducted an examination and has been granted proper authorization for such a statement.”
Although there are some positive aspects to the Goldwater Rule, it presents some conflicting issues.

The rule still prevents the unethical misuse of the psychiatric profession: i.e. it may be tempting to come to a diagnostic conclusion on a public figure when politically convenient, even in the face of a paucity of data.

The rule should allow, however, for psychiatrists and other health-related professionals to voice their concerns regarding the mental stability of high office holders.

In our culture we need a psychological clearance for people working in intelligence, in the FBI, in the police.

Should not we demand a clean bill of mental health for the person who is going to literally control our lives?

For as long a such needed regulation does not exist, should responsible professionals remain silent, obediently abiding by a rule that in this case protects what many consider a manifestly dangerous character at the helm of the world?

One should also consider the ethical obligations to protect public health imposed by the psychiatric profession.

In a letter to the New York Times, 37 psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers alerted on the dangers imposed by President Donald Trump’s mental health status. According to these professionals, the silence imposed by the Goldwater Rule “…has resulted in a failure to lend our expertise to worried journalists and members of Congress at this critical time.”

And they conclude, “We believe that the grave emotional instability indicated by Mr. Trump’s speech and action makes him incapable of serving safely as President.”

Professional impressions could be mild or strong but they are not the same as diagnosis; they can still warn and educate the public preventing potential harm. Such rule should be applied wisely and judiciously but not at the expense of similarly important ethical obligations imposed by the psychiatric profession.

Therefore, while it should be respected, the Goldwater Rule should not gag the psychiatric profession from protecting the public at large.

.

The curse of the iPad

SUBHEAD: The rise of sleeplessness in young people and a praise of boredom as an indicating a need for change.

By Rob Hopkins on 7 May 2017 for Transition Network -
(https://transitionnetwork.org/news-and-blog/curse-ipad-stalks-land-praise-boredom/)


Image above: Family unit at family food franchise all on social media sights on various portable hypnosis machines. From (http://socialmediapersonalrelationships.blogspot.com/2014/03/how-social-media-changed-family-dynamic.html).

Last night I watched the latest episode of Panorama, ‘Sleepless Britain’.  It explored the problems of sleeplessness faced by many families, with visits to hospital caused by poor sleep having tripled in the last 10 years.  A generation of young people not getting as much sleep as they should be is having knock-on impacts in terms of obesity, family breakup, health and education.

It has been shown that poor sleep can reduce academic performance by up to two school years, and many young people are now increasingly reliant on prescription medicines to enable them to get a good night’s sleep.

One of the key reasons the programme identified behind this is the explosion in the use of electronic devices, mostly iPads and smartphones, just before sleep.  The blue light from such devices suppresses our body’s ability to create melatonin, the hormone which helps us get to sleep.

The programme followed several families as they tried to introduce an ‘electronic curfew’ of no screens in the hour before bed, and a more regular bedtime routine, with mixed success.

One of the things the programme didn’t touch on, and which struck me while watching it, was how our culture has developed a deep terror of the idea of ever being bored.  It’s as though every waking minute has to be filled with some kind of stimulation, the “intensification of nervous stimulation” which Matthew B Crawford in The World Beyond Your Head argues is increasingly underpinning our world.

For many young people, the idea of an hour before bed where you have no screens, read a book, draw, meditate, take a long bath or just look out of the window, feels like a ridiculous waste of their time.

And yet boredom really matters.  Many parents seem terrified of their kids ever being bored.  That somehow, bored kids represent a parental failure.  A paper in the journal Behavioural Sciences by Shane Bench and Heather Lench (I wonder if they chose to collaborate on it because their surnames rhymed so beautifully) called ‘On the Function of Boredom’, concludes that:
“Boredom provides a valuable adaptive function by signaling it is time to pursue a new goal”
 I’m not suggesting that our kids should always be bored witless, rather that late night screens are a symptom of our devaluing time in which we are not nervously stimulated in one way or another. If our kids say they are bored, rather than handing them the iPad, perhaps we’d be better to just suggest they sit with that feeling for a while, and see what arises instead.

It’s as though we are always suppressing that moment, rather than sitting with it and seeing what awaits us on the other side.

Some, at least, of the time currently dedicated to swiping up, swiping down, and sending text messages which could just as easily form the basis of an actual conversation the following day, could be spent daydreaming. Like boredom, daydreaming is something that gets bad press these days.

Michael Gove I’m sure hates daydreaming with a passion (I think it was the only thing at school that I excelled in), and his influence over education has resulted in less and less time for it.  Break times are being cut back in schools around the world as more time is demanded for teaching academic subjects.  As Jonah Lehrer writes in an article called The Virtues of Daydreaming:
“It turns out that whenever we are slightly bored—when reality isn’t quite enough for us—we begin exploring our own associations, contemplating counterfactuals and fictive scenarios that only exist within the head”


While Freud dismissed daydreaming as “infantile”, more recent research has come to think of it as an “essential cognitive tool”.  He references research by Benjamin Baird and Jonathan Schooler (who we’ll be publishing an interview with soon here) who argue that “creative solutions may be facilitated specifically by simple external tasks that maximize mind-wandering”.

Have you ever found yourself wondering who wrote a particular song, or scored a particular goal, and then 2 hours later the answer just ‘popped into your head’?  Our brains have an amazing ability to work on problems without our being consciously aware of them.  As Lehrer puts it:
“Question(s) need to marinate in the mind, “incubating” in those subterranean parts of the brain we can barely control”


So what are the kinds of simple tasks that facilitate this kind of thinking?  Lehrer describes them as being tasks which “consume just enough attention to keep us occupied, while leaving plenty of mental resources left over for errant daydreams”.

So, not television, iPads, texting or homework, but rather the kinds of things which, sadly, have been largely purged from most family homes.  Washing up, preparing food, kneading bread, knitting, gardening, sewing. Playing games together.  Time without noise, entertainment, stimulation.

Activities which keep enough of our brains free for daydreaming.

And sleep, of course, which is the time when our brain makes sense of, and files away the day’s varied inputs, rather like librarians working night shifts to get all the books back on the shelves in the right places ready for the next day.

It’s not for nothing that Kierkegaard called sleep “the height of genius”.  As Catherine Hill, a consultant pediatrician at Southampton children’s hospital, puts it in the Panorama program:
“If you could manufacture a pill that could improve your cognitive function, that improved your emotional regulation, that stopped you reaching for the biscuit tin in the afternoon, you’d be a millionaire. That is what sleep can help you with. It’s free, and available to us all”


And it’s not just kids for whom all this matters.  Many adults are sleep deprived too.  Perhaps I have just come up with the campaign idea with the least likelihood of mass engagement, but it deserves its place alongside the other great issues of our time.

“What do we want?” “The right to be bored!  To have time to look out of the window! To chew over the day’s events while doing the dishes!”  “When do we want it?” “Now!”  I’d be there, on that particular demo.

The beauty, of course, is that it needs no permission, just a personal decision that this stuff matters.

The beauty of it though is that steps towards being a family that spends more time together with less distractions, that listens to each other rather than to YouTube videos, that cooks together, sharing skills, recipes and stories, that puts away the iPads and reaches for the boardgames, is going to be happier and healthier anyway.

As Lehrer puts it, daydreaming allows us to “to invent additional possibilities”.  And goodness knows we need those, whatever age we are …


.

Humpbacks rescue others from orcas

SUBHEAD: These whales rescue other species from hunting killer whale packs.

By Bryan Nelson on 30 July 2016 for Mother Nature Network -
(http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/animals/stories/humpback-whales-around-globe-are-mysteriously-rescuing-animals-orcas)


Image above: A humpback whale breaches the ocean surface. From (http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/animals/blogs/weird-new-sound-heard-among-humpback-whales).

Humans might not be the only creatures that care about the welfare of other animals. Scientists are beginning to recognize a pattern in humpback whale behavior around the world, a seemingly intentional effort to rescue animals that are being hunted by killer whales.

Marine ecologist Robert Pitman observed a particularly dramatic example of this behavior back in 2009, while observing a pod of killer whales hunting a Weddell seal trapped on an ice floe off Antarctica.

The orcas were able to successfully knock the seal off the ice, and just as they were closing in for the kill, a magnificent humpback whale suddenly rose up out of the water beneath the seal.

This was no mere accident. In order to better protect the seal, the whale placed it safely on its upturned belly to keep it out of the water.

As the seal slipped down the whale's side, the humpback appeared to use its flippers to carefully help the seal back aboard. Finally, when the coast was clear, the seal was able to safely swim off to another, more secure ice floe.

Another event, involving a pair of humpback whales attempting to save a gray whale calf from a hunting pod of orcas after it had become separated from its mother, was captured by BBC filmmakers. You can watch the dramatic footage here:


Image above: From (https://youtu.be/-lw8_SAtX8o).

Perhaps the most stunning aspect of this behavior is that it's not just a few isolated incidents. Humpback whale rescue teams have been witnessed foiling killer whale hunts from Antarctica to the North Pacific. It's as if humpback whales everywhere are saying to killer whales: pick on someone your own size! It seems to be a global effort; an inherent feature of humpback whale behavior.

After witnessing one of these events himself back in 2009, Pitman was compelled to investigate further. He began collecting accounts of humpback whales interacting with orcas, and found nothing short of 115 documented interactions, reported by 54 different observers between 1951 and 2012. The details of this surprising survey can be found in the journal Marine Mammal Science.

In 89 percent of the recorded incidents, the humpbacks seemed to intervene only as the killer whales began their hunt, or when they were already engaged in a hunt. It seems clear from the data that the humpback whales are choosing to interact with the orcas specifically to interrupt their hunts. Among the animals that have been observed being rescued by humpback whales were California sea lions, ocean sunfish, harbor seals, and gray whales.

So the question is: Why are humpback whales doing this? Since the humpbacks seem to be risking their own well being to save animals of completely different species, it's hard to deny that this behavior seems altruistic.

There is also some reason to believe that the behavior isn't entirely selfless. Mature humpback whales are too large and too formidable to be hunted by orcas themselves, but their calves are vulnerable.

Orcas have been witnessed hunting humpback whale calves in much the same way that they hunt gray whale calves. So, by proactively foiling orca hunts, perhaps the humpbacks are hoping to make them think twice about messing with their own calves.

Then again, maybe it's just as simple as revenge. Even if it has more to do with revenge than altruism, though, the behavior would represent evidence of an intense and complicated emotional life among humpbacks that is unprecedented in the animal world, outside of primates.

One common feature among many humpback whale rescue efforts is that the humpbacks often work in pairs. Scientists will need to do more research into this behavior, though, to truly understand the significance of it.

Until then, these beautiful animals, which are perhaps best known for their majestic songs, have certainly earned some additional respect. They might just be the ocean's most ferocious and selfless first-responders.
.

COP21 should include "Grieving"

SUBHEAD: Grieving is not surrender but an acceptance of what can’t be changed and a commitment to what can be accomplished.

By Robert Jensen on 30 November 2015 for TelesurTV -
(http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/A-Missing-Item-on-the-COP21-Climate-Agenda-Grieving-20151130-0022.html)


Image above: Photograph of the "Plain Radical" Jim Koplin in middle age. From (http://healingourworldandourselves.org/robert-jensen/).

This 21st round of the U.N. Conference of Parties (COP21) hopes for an agreement on reducing greenhouse gas emissions to hold the global temperature increase to 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

That’s an ambitious goal, mocked by some as idealistic, but there’s nothing wrong with ambition yoked to ideals. Still, goals also must be realistic, consistent with the laws of physics and chemistry, and honest about the possibilities within, and the impediments created by, the world’s economic and political systems.

Here’s one of the toughest parts of those realities we have to grapple with: Even if leaders produce a serious agreement with enforcement mechanisms, we will not be living in the same kind of world in which people created those social systems. The consequences of human recklessness define our future.

Even if pledges for emission reductions being discussed by world leaders were to be achieved, we are going to see potentially catastrophic global warming by the end of this century, and likely far earlier.

The scientific community’s consensus on climate change includes not only models about what likely will happen if we don’t curtail emissions, but the extent of the warming already locked in by past emissions and the intensifying effects of climate feedback loops.

Grieving is not surrender but an acceptance of what can’t be changed and a commitment to what can be accomplished, within limits the ecosphere sets.

And climate disruption is only one part of the story of ecological degradation. Predictions are a fool’s game, but look at any critical measure of the health of the ecosphere on which our lives depend—groundwater depletion, topsoil loss, chemical contamination, increased toxicity in our own bodies, the number and size of “dead zones” in the oceans, accelerating extinction of species and reduction of biodiversity—and ask a simple question: Are we heading in the right direction?

Whether or not we want to confront any of this politically, many people have at least a visceral sense of what is coming. If we want to begin shaping a livable future, we should start grieving, collectively, for what we have lost and likely will lose.

Grieving is not surrender but an acceptance of what can’t be changed and a commitment to what can be accomplished, within limits the ecosphere sets. We understand the importance of such grieving in personal contexts, when we lose loved ones, and now we need to apply it to the planet, together.

My friend Jim Koplin was the first person I knew who had faced these realities, decades ago, long before these crises were headline news. Jim was radicalized by the social movements of the 1960s and shaped by his rural roots in the dirt of the Depression-era farm on which he was born.

As he focused on social justice, critiquing the domination/subordination dynamic at the heart of exploitation within the human family, he was increasingly more alarmed about the effects of humans’ attempts to dominate the larger living world.

Because he refused to turn away from reality, later in his life Jim confided to his friends, “I wake up every morning in a state of profound grief.”

Jim wasn’t unhappy with his life or depressed. His grief, not only for people suffering but also for the destruction of the living systems of the world, didn’t lead him to retreat. Until he died at 79, Jim was actively engaged in political projects, public education efforts, and community organizing.

His capacity to face difficult truths was a source of strength, and so important to me that after his death I wrote a book about him, Plain Radical, offering his wisdom to those who never met him.

Jim helped me understand that there are no solutions to multiple, cascading ecological crises if we insist on maintaining the high-energy/high-technology existence lived in much of the industrialized world (and desired by many currently excluded from it).

Even many tough-minded activists willing to challenge unjust concentrations of wealth and power are reluctant to let go of a commitment to this so-called “lifestyle,” which has not produced a culture of life but a kind of death cult, a society that values cheap pleasures and cheap toys more than healthy people and a healthy planet.

When we refuse to grieve for what is passing away, we are more likely to cling irrationally to ways of living that cannot be sustained. When we cannot acknowledge the deep sorrow of what is lost, we scramble to hide from the reality of the loss and perpetuate the illusion that we can continue on this course.

That’s why a collective grieving process should be a priority for us all, helping us let go of the delusion that we can maintain unsustainable systems.

The technological fundamentalists—those who believe we can defy all limits and invent our way out of any crisis—will tell us we need to use our imaginations. I agree, but our task is not to imagine a narcissistic science-fiction future. A decent human future—perhaps the possibility of a human future at all—depends on our ability to imagine a new relationship to the larger living world.

• Robert Jensen is a professor in the School of Journalism at the University of Texas at Austin and board member of the Third Coast Activist Resource Center in Austin. He is the author of Plain Radical: Living, Loving, and Learning to Leave the Planet Gracefully (Counterpoint/Soft Skull, 2015).

Time for The Last Guardian

SUBHEAD: Can a video game character become a real friend? Should you care?

By Laura Hudson on 21 June 2015 for Boing Boing -
(http://boingboing.net/2015/06/22/e3-2015-best-games.html)

http://www.islandbreath.org/2015Year/06/150623tricobig.jpg
Image above: A young boy meets who is to become his companion - Trico - a dog, cat, chicken beast the size of a dragon. Click to embiggen. From (http://www.gamesradar.com/last-guardian-believe-games/).

The annual video game onslaught of E3 is finally over, and as expected, it served up plenty of big-budget sequels, like Halo 5, Fallout 4, Dishonored 2, Uncharted 4, and of course, the Final Fantasy VII remake that made everyone lose their collective minds.

But a lot of other cool things happened at E3, like yarn, robot dinosaurs, and a giant, awesome dog, not to mention a comparatively remarkable number of titles with female protagonists. Join me now on a whirlwind tour of all the exciting new games that weren't popular franchise names followed by numbers!

The moment I saw the beginning of The Last Guardian trailer I said aloud, "oh man, please let this entire game be about this giant dog." Great news: it is. People have been waiting for The Last Guardian since 2007, largely because it's the newest title from Fumito Ueda, the guy who made super beloved puzzle-ish action games like Ico and Shadow of Colossus.

You play as a young boy who befriends a giant dog-cat-bird and has to help guide him across a lot of precarious platforms, and if the trailer is any indication it will simultaneously trigger both your "oh god, don't kill the dog!" and "oh god, don't kill the kid!" anxieties near constantly.

Where: PlayStation 4

When: 2016


Video above: Recent trailer for The Last Guardian. From (https://youtu.be/zXLZvsSmBIs).


.

The Purse

SUBHEAD: It started with what might be called a careless accident.

By Tom Teitge on 9 February 2009 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2009/02/purse.html)


Image above: "Lovers" by Zhang Yaxi from http://www.zhangyaxi.com.cn/en/sculpture_portfolio/Lover/


He lay basking in the warm afterglow of their lovemaking; and gazed across at her chaotic hair on the pillow. He'd had many women before this; his background: the heady financial district, quick relationships, high flights of luxury, the promise of ever fulfilled dreams; and then, the flowering into yet another gray and dreary Monday. She was a different breed; no high price hair cut, no tailored garments.

She was of an earthier vein. Her aspirations of prosperity were rooted in the real soil of the earth, not in abstract financial strategy.

She had a grace, a glamor even, that could not be bought at even the most exclusive of establishments. Nor could it even be embellished. It shone through, raw and naked. She talked little of her past.

She was evasive and laughed away attempts to ferret out historic details.

His thoughts wandered back to when he had first seen her; and how lovely she had looked in the downtown soft evening light. She looked vaguely out of place in the district. How had she even found a parking place?

She had stepped out of an older vehicle. Even the color of its paint was somehow foreign to the surroundings here. The contents of her purse had spilled across the sidewalk. He stopped abruptly in his stride and she looked up, and their eyes met.

There was a slightly bemused smile; a slight raising of the eyebrows, as if to unapologetically say, "Well, there you have it!".

And from that moment, he was caught. They spoke. She laughed at herself. He had on a nice suit, and expensive polished shoes. She was open to him; but hardly charmed; just open and just barely. He made the moves. He was the acquiescent one. "Could I help you?", he begged.

She could have said no; but, she would not have taken the trouble to say no; and so, this was how it all started. From that moment, he thought only of her. He sought to know her better; and slowly the relationship evolved. That was the turn in the road of his life.

Now three years later, the same purse reclined in the corner of their small bedroom, resting on a chair. How happy he had been in the peace of their lives together. He had no regrets; for all he had given up for her. In retrospect, his life, with all its enviable success, had been a mad-house of confusion.

The modest home, they now shared, was the antithesis of the elegance of his former area in the city. To the alarm of his high-rolling colleagues, he had effectively burned all the bridges, of his carefully constructed career. She, and the quiet countryside, and their simple home, had become his whole world.

And, though the loss, or rejection of his former world had come at a price, he seldom looked back. Their lives were bounded by the work they shared and found fulfilling.

At times, it still amazed him, that he had chosen a path so divergent from some previously established formula of desire; all of what he, and those around him, had aspired to.

His former friends could barely cloak their disapproval, their disbelief, and when confronted by this he became momentarily confused himself. But she made it all clear. Without a word, it was she that made it all clear: a new set of values, a new perspective, a parallel universe in which, yes, sometimes he panicked briefly with doubt.

But, then, there she would be. They cultivated various medicinal herbs, and sold them to a distributor. The money kept them going. Comfortably, by all measures, they led a healthy life, really. They kept a vegetable garden, as well, and she taught him cooking; simple, yet delicious.

Now when his old friends came to visit, there was less and less in common. And they did not care when these visitors ceased to come. He had long since sold his Mercedes, and now drove an older Chevy pickup.

And she had mentioned that the style of her old purse had a classic enduring quality, one which she was happy not to replace. She had an elegance all of her own; a richness, a true value.

When she smiled and broke into laughter, there was no affectation; just a plain and simple joy; but this was accompanied with a private distance, an unstated understanding of something. What?

When he tried to break down her invisible barriers, she responded with a quiet smile, a distant look, a slightly whimsical shake of her head. It occurred to him that his happiness was too perfect, and he looked with fear at any change that might disturb their lives.

She rose from the bed, pulled a brush from the purse, and carelessly moved her hair back from her face. She did not hide her nakedness. Instead she wore it with no thought.

Yet, simultaneously, she appeared the perfect picture of modesty. She turned to see the sun setting through the window. And as she did, she saw dust rising from their long dirt drive. She could see a car approaching. He rose and pulled on clothes.

At first, she stared for an unusually long moment. Something was changing. A cloud drifted across the sun. In their time together, he had learned something of her past; her life without him, before him.

he never dwelled on it. But there had been past love, past passion, and with someone of her type, how could it ever be past?

Tears began to well in her eyes. And she shuddered slightly, as she quickly dressed. He looked at her with alarm. She turned and faced him.

And with the quietest voice imaginable, said, simply, explaining the universe in a grain of sand: "You knew he'd be back.".

Intricate spider webs of longing and commitment, of obligations and loyalties, and of hopes and desires, stretched and crisscrossed backwards, through the years. And though it was unspoken, they both knew, even in that instant, that she would return to a former life. He had been transformed from his previous life. He had found a better way.

She had been his epiphany. She had been his compass star. There was something of his new life that could exist independent of her; the new perspectives, the new values; they could remain; in fact, would remain. She had laughingly told him once, half joking, that enlightenment was a one way street. It climbed upward. It did not descend.

He had followed her, and now, she would return to a past; a life that had fallen from her years ago; like a purse spilling onto the sidewalk, scattering all things randomly.

In that moment, as he stood next to the bed, with its scattered sheets, and as she descended the stairs; he saw, in a flash, that the spilled purse, the very miracle that had transformed his life; had been, but a careless accident.

• Tom Teitge, and artist, and a former resident of Hanapepe, Kauai, who now lives in Haley, Idaho.