Showing posts with label Bureaucracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bureaucracy. Show all posts

When reform becomes impossible

SUBHEAD: It's cheaper and more effective to let the system collapse than squander treasure attempting reforms.

By Charles Hugh Smith on 5 November 2015 for Of Two Minds -
(http://www.oftwominds.com/blognov15/collapse-cheap11-15.html)


Image above: Album cover from the original motion picture soundtrack from the movie "Turn On, Tune In, Drop Out" by Timothy Leary. From (http://www.crossmap.com/blogs/timothy-leary-and-lifes-meaning-6876).

Collapse begins when real reform becomes impossible. Reforms that can't be stopped by the outright purchase of politicos are watered down in committee, and loopholes wide enough for jumbo-jets of cash to fly through are inserted.

The reform quickly becomes "reform"--a simulacrum that maintains the facade of fixing what's broken while maintaining the Status Quo. Another layer of costly bureaucracy is added, along with hundreds or thousands of pages of additional regulations, all of which add cost and friction without actually solving what was broken.

The added friction increases the system's operating costs at multiple levels. Practitioners must stop doing actual work to fill out forms that are filed and forgotten; lobbyists milk the system to eradicate any tiny reductions in the flow of swag; attorneys probe the new regulations for weaknesses with lawsuits, and the enforcing agencies add staff to issue fines.

None of this actually fixes what was broken; all these fake-reforms add costs and reduce whatever efficiencies kept the system afloat. Recent examples include the banking regulations passed in the wake of the 2008 meltdown and the ObamaCare Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Back in 2010 I prepared this chart of The Lifecycle of Bureaucracy: as bureaucracies expand, they inevitably become less accountable, less efficient, more bloated with legacy staffing and requirements that no longer make sense, etc.

As costs soar, the bureaucracy's budget is attacked, and the agency circles the wagons and focuses on lobbying politicos and the public to leave the budget untouched.

Since accountability has been dissipated, management becomes increasingly incompetent and larded with people who can't be fired so they were kicked upstairs. Staff morale plummets as the competent quit/transfer out in disgust, leaving the least productive and those clinging on in order to retire with generous government benefits.

In this state of terminal decline, the agency's original function is no longer performed adequately and the system implodes from the dead weight of its high costs, lack of accountability, gross incompetence, inability to adapt and staggering inefficiency.

I've covered this dynamic a number of times:

Our Legacy Systems: Dysfunctional, Unreformable (July 1, 2013)
The Way Forward (April 25, 2013)
When Escape from a Previously Successful Model Is Impossible (November 29, 2012)
Complexity: Bureaucratic (Death Spiral) and Self-Organizing (Sustainable) (February 17, 2011)

This generates a ratchet effect, where costs increase even as the bureaucracy's output declines. The ratchet effect can also be visualized as a rising wedge, in which costs and inefficiencies continue rising until any slight decrease in funding collapses the organization.

Dislocations Ahead: The Ratchet Effect, Stick-Slip and QE3 (February 14, 2011)
The Ratchet Effect: Fiefdom Bloat and Resistance to Declining Incomes (August 23, 2010)
The net result of the Ratchet Effect and the impossibility of reform is this: it's cheaper and more effective to let the system collapse than squander time and treasure attempting reforms that are bound to fail as vested interests will fight to the death to retain every shred of power and swag.

Since the constituent parts refuse to accept any real reforms, the entire system implodes. We can look at healthcare, higher education and the National Security State as trillion-dollar examples of systems that become increasingly costly even as their performance declines or falls off the cliff.

This is the lesson of history, as described in the seminal book The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization.

Collapse does not need to be complete or sudden. Collapse tends to be a process, not an event.

Collapse begins when you can't find any doctors willing to accept Medicaid payments, when the potholes don't get filled even when voters approve millions of dollars in new taxes, and when kids aren't learning anything remotely useful or practical despite the school board raising tens of millions of dollars in additional property taxes.

Collapse begins when real reform becomes impossible.


.

Criminalization of everyday life

SUBHEAD: A modest proposal to radically reduce America's expensive bureaucracies.

By Charles Hugh Smith on 12 December 2013 for Of Two Minds -
(http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/a-modest-proposal-to-radically-reduce.html)


Image above: "Is it against the law to contact aliens with my tinfoil hat?" "Yes!" From original article.

Yesterday I described the power of digital technologies to replace paid work: The Python (Script) That Ate Your Job. Since organizations only have expenses, any paid work that can be replaced by software and/or robots will eventually be replaced by software and/or robots. Maintaining high expenses is a fast-track to going broke.

Which brings me to the nation's vast array of overlapping public and private bureaucracies.

I suspect that a significant percentage of the nation's many bureaucracies could be replaced with a very simple script that yielded one answer to most queries: no.

If the answer to all queries was "yes," there would be no need for bureaucracies to rubberstamp this approval. If the answer to any query was "no," then there would also be no need for bureaucracies to rubberstamp this denial.

Bureaucracies justify their power, payroll and budget by granting occasional favors of "yes" to supplicants who bow before the power of the bureaucracy and pay the appropriate fees.

In other words, bureaucracies justify their power, payroll and budget by saying "no" conditionally. If the agency issued "yes" as a matter of default, then the agency could be replaced by a script. The same is true of the agency always issued a "no" as a default; that agency could also be replaced by a simple script.

The modest proposal is to replace all bureaucracies with simple scripts that mimic actual bureaucratic function and output but without the extraordinary cost of tens of thousands of employees. We should also recall that regulatory bureaucracies are designed to be captured by monied private interests, i.e. "some are more equal than others." This intrinsic well of injustice would be capped off by automated scripts.

Here's an example of how this would work.

All queries relating to permits, fees and what is against the law will be handled in this fashion:
"Do I need a permit to do X?"
(When "X" equals planting a garden in my front yard, baking a loaf of bread, building killler drones in my garage, perform minor surgery on myself, etc.)?"
Default response: "Yes".

"Is X against the law or prohibited by statutes?"
( When "X" equals attempting to contact aliens via my tin-foil hat, crossing the street with a geranium plant, wearing mismatched socks in public, etc.)
Default response: "Yes". If it isn't against the law, it will be shortly.
"Can I do X?"
(When "X" equals dream of freedom, paint my front door red, build a submarine in my backyard, keep rodents as outdoor pets, seek the Tao, skateboard in my neighbor's empty swimming pool, etc.)?"
Default response: "No".
Private corporate bureaucracies would have a slightly different set of defaults:
"How do I contact customer support?"
Default response: "No".

"How do I go about getting a refund?"
Default response: "No".

"Can I buy an upgrade online?"
Default response: "Yes".
One justification for the expansion of public bureaucracies is the pressing need to criminalize every aspect of life in America: How Every Part of American Life Became a Police Matter, or Ea O Ka Aina: The over policing of America.

But justifying the expansion of centralized authority and Central State bureaucracies via overcriminalization could easily be scripted as well. For example, the script could insert operative phrases that criminalize virtually everything, at almost no cost to the taxpayer. For example:

"Can I skateboard on the sidewalks?"
No. You are a public threat, and therefore subject to arrest and imprisonment in America's gulag.

"Can I stop my kid's attention-deficit-whatever meds and just eliminate sugar, TV and violent videogames from his life?"
No. Sugar, violent videogames and addictive meds are all high-profit and therefore of the highest public good, and your proposal is a threat. Should you attempt to curtail your child's addictions to sugar, videogames and high-profit medications, you will be subject to arrest and imprisonment in America's gulag.

"Can my 7-year old boy hug his 7-year old friend at school who happens to be a girl?"
No. That is inappropriate touching. In fact, all touching is inappropriate. If this hug occurs and you fail to immediately stop it, you will be subject to arrest and imprisonment in America's gulag.

"Can I sell a few spliffs of home-grown medical marijuana to a friend?"
No. You are a dealer of dangerous drugs and deserve a "tenner" in America's gulag.

The script could also insert appropriate warnings such as:

Please note that if you live in locales with private police forces and private prisons, the odds of you being arrested and incarcerated in a highly profitable private prison are significantly higher than if you live in a jurisdiction with an overstretched public police force and an already crowded state gulag.

To mimic the rare approval of actual bureaucracies, the script could randomly generate approvals, subject to payment of fees. For example:
"Can I dump toxic chemical waste in my neighbor's empty swimming pool?"
Response: yes, if you complete the appropriate forms and pay the processing fees.

With my modest proposal, at least we won't be paying a fortune for the criminalization of every aspect of life by an out-of-control array of Central State bureaucracies. A few simple scripts could do the same job, and millions of people currently working in centralized bureaucracies would be free to pursue something more productive than the criminalization of everyday life.

If you want to find out what a "tenner" is, or what centralized authority and the criminalization of everyday life leads to, please read the three volumes of The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn:

The Gulag Archipelago: 1918-1956
The Gulag Archipelago 2
Gulag Archipelago 3

To those who say "it can't happen here" I reply: it's already happened here. War at Home: Covert action against U.S. activists



.

Nakamura to replace Heu

SUBHEAD: Into the lifeboat. Councilperson Nakamura to be new Kauai County Managing Director.

By Joan Conrow on 11 October 2013 for Kauai Eclectic -
(http://kauaieclectic.blogspot.com/2013/10/nakamura-to-be-new-county-managing.html)


Image above: A woman in a lifeboat as the sun sets on Kauai. mashup by Juan Wilson.

Nadine Nakamura, vice chair of the Kauai County Council, will be resigning her seat to become the new county managing director, effective Nov. 1.

Nadine was first elected to the Council in 2010 and emerged as the top vote-getter in the 2012 race. She holds a master's degree in urban and regional planning from the University of Hawaii and has more than 20 years' experience as a planner and facilitator, skills that will serve her well in managing the county and its relationship with the Council.

She takes the place of Gary Heu, who several months ago announced his resignation, effective Oct. 31.

Nadine's departure will leave a significant void on the Council, where she was known for pragmatic, thoughtful decisions and careful attention to detail.

Her colleagues will choose her successor. According to the County Charter:

In the event a vacancy occurs in the council, the remaining members of the council shall appoint a successor with the required qualifications to fill the vacancy for the unexpired term. If the council is unable to fill a vacancy within (30) days after its occurrence, the mayor shall make the appointment to such vacancy.

The question now is who the Council will choose as her replacement. Former Councilman Kipukai Kualii finished eighth in the 2012 race.



Nakamura into the lifeboat

SUBHEAD: It will be interesting to see if Nakamura pushes to defer Bill 2491 tomorrow, as Mayor Carvalho wishes.

By Juan Wilson on 14 October 2013 for Island Breath -

It seems too much of a coincidence that the appointment of Nadine Nakamure to the post of County Managing Director will begin immediately after the conclusion of the deliberations on Bill 2491. It followed Mayor Carvalho's feeble uninformed testimony to the county council on  Bill 2491 alongside his equally clueless "manager" Gary Hue.

All along Nakamura, along with JoAnn Yukimura, has been walking a narrow line that appears to support the popular bill to regulate pesticide/GMO activity on Kauai. However, they both contributed to weakening the bill's EIS and permitting provisions.

My opinion is that Bill 2491 is something both women would like to see disappear. It puts them in a conflict that is politically damaging.

The offer of the position of Kauai County Managing Director to Nadine is a natural one, but comes at a time that casts a shadow over her vote on Bill 2491. Is she now the agent of Mayor Bernard Carvalho on the County Council?

Certainly the timing will let her bail out of the politically precarious repercussions that may follow. Right after the fate of Bill 2491 is determined she will be ensconced in a nicely paid comfy executive job for the mayor.

Let's hope she can give the mayor better more effective advise than Gary Heu. At least I trust she'll do her homework.


.

Obama's 2,300 page Constitution

SUBHEAD: The U.S. Constitution leaves too many areas open to interpretation. Obama proposes that a new one is the solution.

By Charles Hugh Smith on 10 October 2013 for Of Two Minds -
(http://www.oftwominds.com/blogoct13/constitution-parody10-13.html)


Image above: A Senate aide delivers federal regulations dealing with the Affordable Care Act, printed out and bound in red tape, for a debate on the budget in the Senate at the Capitol in Washington, Friday, March 22, 2013. From (http://rare.us/story/the-10000-commandments-regulations-up-21/).

The U.S. Constitution leaves too many areas open to interpretation; a New Constituion of 2,300 pages (+ 200 redacted secret pages) is the solution.

The Obama Administration has proposed replacing the current U.S. Constitution (4,543 words, including the signatures) with a new 2,300-page "new Constitution" that in the words of an administration spokesperson, "clears up the gray areas in the current Constitution."

The proposal was launched after the success of two recent 1,000+ page pieces of legislation, the Affordable Care Act and the Dodd-Frank financial reform act.

An additional 200+ pages of the "new Constitution" are redacted due to the sensitive nature of the National Security-related amendments.

Lobbyists from key industries were invited to contribute amendments to the new Constitution;" constitutional legal experts were also invited to submit improvements to the current law of the land.

Some critics who have reviewed the 2,300 pages of the proposed "new Constitution" have stated that the document is impenetrable even to those with law degrees. Average citizens "will be unable to understand the laws that govern their lives."

Other observers note that the complexity and length of legislation such as the Affordable Care Act and the Dodd-Frank financial reform act are already beyond the comprehension of all but a handful of experts.

An administration spokesperson defended the proposed re-write on the grounds that "the new Constitution will provide the clarity that people want in their Constitution."