Road to World War 3

SUBHEAD: Those controlling the American empire are willing to enter World War III to get their way.

By Aaron Hawking on 11 September 2012 for Strom Clouds Gathering -
(http://stormcloudsgathering.com/the-road-to-world-war-3)


Image above:Still image from video below. From original  article.

We are on a road that leads straight to the World War 3, but in order to see that and to fully understand what is at stake you have to look at the big picture and connect the dots. This video examines the history of the dollar, its relation to oil, and the real motives behind the wars of the past two decades.


Video above: "The Roaf to World War 3". From (http://youtu.be/HP7L8bw5QF4).

Credits:
Music is original composition by StormCloudsGathering
Thumbnail is creative commons
Scenes from Grey State trailer used with permission from http://www.graystatemovie.com
.

Screwing with the internet

SUBHEAD: Yesterday there was a peculiar breakdown of internet service. It could have been a glitch or it could have been the NSA.

By Juan Wilson on 11 September 2012 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2012/09/screwing-with-internet.html)


Image above: Anonymous and V for Vendetta, or is it the NSA. From (http://www.examiner.com/article/go-daddy-hosted-sites-off-line-anonymous-member-claims-responsibility).

Yesterday morning when we booted our computer to post the days articles on Island Breath a strange thing happened. We couldn't raise our website. We have a peculiar structure to our site... it resides in two realms. One is at (www.islandbreath.org). This is the overarching parent and frame of Island Breath as well as the location of all graphic images. Articles created prior to 2009 are also there.

The other realm is where new individual articles are posted (http://islandbreath.blogspot.com). I won't go into the details, but this arrangement makes it easier for our editors to put the stories together.

The (www.islandbreath.org) was unavailable yesterday morning, whereas (http://islandbreath.blogspot.com) was available. As a result no one, including us, could get to our home page, and if they could find a posted article there was no graphics. This was because the host for  (www.islandbreath.org) who have their servers in Phoenix, Arizona, could not be reached through any web browser we tried in Windows or Mac operating systems.

Our blogspot  posted articles are hosted by Google and Google did not seen affected by the overall blackout, but other sites were.

Yesterday morning Chris Record wrote at (http://www.empowernetwork.com/takemassiveaction/blog/godaddy-hacked-on-9-10-2012/)
GoDaddy has been Hacked!
If you use email, or surf the web, or have any domains at GoDaddy, you are likely affected by the Anonymous Hack on Godaddy today.

Servers are down.  Emails are down.  Websites are Down.  Millions of them…They are currently troubleshooting the issues, and there is not much that we can do but sit back and wait and contemplate what life is like without the internet for a little while.

Godaddy Hacked!

Well, it wasn't just GoDaddy sites affected. We use (www.VoxDomains.com) and all the sites they hosted, as well as their parent site, were down. Calls to the company resulted in either that funny beeping you get when you cannot make a connection  - or when you could - an insane mix of muzak and interrupted robotic messages about how important our call was, and all we had to do was hang on.

We noticed that big corporate internet sites seemed unaffected. Lots of independent  and small business sties were. For example, the website of storage facility at the Lawai Cannery was out all morning and intothe afternoon. There business database is online and was unavailable.

Maybe it was an Anonymous hack and maybe not. Another suggestion was that it was an NSA interruption to better secure flow and control of selected intelligence targets.

See also:
http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/10/godaddy-outage-takes-down-millions-of-sites
http://www.examiner.com/article/go-daddy-hosted-sites-off-line-anonymous-member-claims-responsibility
Ea O Ka Aina: Big Brother's New Home 3/15/12
.

Deaf before the storm

SUBHEAD: The inner circle of neocons surrounding George Bush were deaf to the CIA warnings of Al Qaeda terrorism.

By Kurt Eichenwald on 11 September 2011 for New York Times -
(http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html)


Image above:George Bush being informed by Andy Card of 911 attack. From (http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/mirror-mirror-on-the-wall/).

It was perhaps the most famous presidential briefing in history. On August 6, 2001, President George W. Bush received a classified review of the threats posed by Osama bin Laden and his terrorist network, Al Qaeda. That morning’s “presidential daily brief” — the top-secret document prepared by America’s intelligence agencies — featured the now-infamous heading: “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.” A few weeks later, on 9/11, Al Qaeda accomplished that goal. 

On April 10, 2004, the Bush White House declassified that daily brief — and only that daily brief in response to pressure from the 9/11 Commission, which was investigating the events leading to the attack. Administration officials dismissed the document’s significance, saying that, despite the jaw-dropping headline, it was only an assessment of Al Qaeda’s history, not a warning of the impending attack. While some critics considered that claim absurd, a close reading of the brief showed that the argument had some validity. 

That is, unless it was read in conjunction with the daily briefs preceding Aug. 6, the ones the Bush administration would not release. While those documents are still not public, I have read excerpts from many of them, along with other recently declassified records, and come to an inescapable conclusion: the administration’s reaction to what Mr. Bush was told in the weeks before that infamous briefing reflected significantly more negligence than has been disclosed. In other words, the Aug. 6 document, for all of the controversy it provoked, is not nearly as shocking as the briefs that came before it.
The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. 

By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible.
  
But some in the administration considered the warning to be just bluster. An intelligence official and a member of the Bush administration both told me in interviews that the neoconservative leaders who had recently assumed power at the Pentagon were warning the White House that the C.I.A. had been fooled; according to this theory, Bin Laden was merely pretending to be planning an attack to distract the administration from Saddam Hussein, whom the neoconservatives saw as a greater threat.
 
 Intelligence officials, these sources said, protested that the idea of Bin Laden, an Islamic fundamentalist, conspiring with Mr. Hussein, an Iraqi secularist, was ridiculous, but the neoconservatives’ suspicions were nevertheless carrying the day. 

In response, the C.I.A. prepared an analysis that all but pleaded with the White House to accept that the danger from Bin Laden was real. 

“The U.S. is not the target of a disinformation campaign by Usama Bin Laden,” the daily brief of June 29 read, using the government’s transliteration of Bin Laden’s first name. Going on for more than a page, the document recited much of the evidence, including an interview that month with a Middle Eastern journalist in which Bin Laden aides warned of a coming attack, as well as competitive pressures that the terrorist leader was feeling, given the number of Islamists being recruited for the separatist Russian region of Chechnya. 

And the C.I.A. repeated the warnings in the briefs that followed. Operatives connected to Bin Laden, one reported on June 29, expected the planned near-term attacks to have “dramatic consequences,” including major casualties. On July 1, the brief stated that the operation had been delayed, but “will occur soon.” Some of the briefs again reminded Mr. Bush that the attack timing was flexible, and that, despite any perceived delay, the planned assault was on track. 

Yet, the White House failed to take significant action. Officials at the Counterterrorism Center of the C.I.A. grew apoplectic. On July 9, at a meeting of the counterterrorism group, one official suggested that the staff put in for a transfer so that somebody else would be responsible when the attack took place, two people who were there told me in interviews. The suggestion was batted down, they said, because there would be no time to train anyone else. 

That same day in Chechnya, according to intelligence I reviewed, Ibn Al-Khattab, an extremist who was known for his brutality and his links to Al Qaeda, told his followers that there would soon be very big news. Within 48 hours, an intelligence official told me, that information was conveyed to the White House, providing more data supporting the C.I.A.’s warnings. Still, the alarm bells didn’t sound. 

On July 24, Mr. Bush was notified that the attack was still being readied, but that it had been postponed, perhaps by a few months. But the president did not feel the briefings on potential attacks were sufficient, one intelligence official told me, and instead asked for a broader analysis on Al Qaeda, its aspirations and its history. In response, the C.I.A. set to work on the Aug. 6 brief. 

In the aftermath of 9/11, Bush officials attempted to deflect criticism that they had ignored C.I.A. warnings by saying they had not been told when and where the attack would occur. That is true, as far as it goes, but it misses the point. Throughout that summer, there were events that might have exposed the plans, had the government been on high alert. Indeed, even as the Aug. 6 brief was being prepared, Mohamed al-Kahtani, a Saudi believed to have been assigned a role in the 9/11 attacks, was stopped at an airport in Orlando, Fla., by a suspicious customs agent and sent back overseas on Aug. 4. Two weeks later, another co-conspirator, Zacarias Moussaoui, was arrested on immigration charges in Minnesota after arousing suspicions at a flight school. But the dots were not connected, and Washington did not react. 

Could the 9/11 attack have been stopped, had the Bush team reacted with urgency to the warnings contained in all of those daily briefs? We can’t ever know. And that may be the most agonizing reality of all.
.

Revisiting Kealalani Speculation

SUBHEAD: The Kauai Planning Department believes this project runs counter to the public desire for less residential development on ag lands.

By Joan Conrow on 10 September 2012 for Kauai Eclectic -
(http://kauaieclectic.blogspot.com/2012/09/musings-revisiting.html)


Image above: Justin Kollar (3rd from right) wins the most beautiful barong shirt competition t Kauai Filipino Women's Club Terno Ball. From original article.

I sensed light in the darkness and opened my eyes to see a golden wedge of waning moon rising through the trees. It was still out there, but higher and whiter, and escorted by the bright beacons of Jupiter and Venus, when I revisited it as the dogs and I went walking this morning.

It's not every day that the Planning Commission gets to revisit — and hopefully correct — a bad decision, but that day is coming tomorrow. That's when Kealanani — the Kealia “ag subdivision” across the highway from another enclave of gentlemen's estates, Kealia Kai — is asking for an unprecedented eight-year extension.
The developer not only failed to meet the five-year deadline for completing infrastructure, it hasn't done any construction at all. Now it wants more time. I was amused to see the reason listed in the planning staff report: “The delay has been attributed to the complexity and overall size of the project.”

While the project is no doubt large — they want to develop 2,000 acres into 188 CPR lots — it's been plagued with financing problems, including one foreclosure, and has changed hands twice in the past five years.

The developer also wants to substitute its existing surety bond for the project with an $18.4 million mortgage held by the County, prompting county planners to note that foreclosure and liquidation in the event of default could cost the County “substantial amounts of time and money.”


Yes, I know it's pretty cheeky to come to the County with a “deal” like this — a deal that could be withdrawn if the developer fails to prevail in its property tax appeal. But it's not surprising, considering the developer previously managed to convince ousted Planning Director Ian Costa, the Planning Commission and the state Land Use Commission that this was a “real” ag subdivision, as opposed to the usual gentlemen's estate.

Even the New York Times took that bait, running an article on how Kealanani was “preserving Kauai's rural heritage” because landowners would be required to actually farm their farm lots. But with parcels priced from $500,000 to $3 million back in 2007, it was obvious that farmers were not the targeted market.

Now the developer is also claiming that more time is needed to complete “community improvements,” including fixing up the Kealia rodeo site and donating it to a nonprofit, building a poi mill, fixing up Kealia Store and donating a 14.7-acre lot to the county for a sports park. However, the planning staff report says there's no guarantee that such “improvements” would actually be made.

Oh, and remember how the developer claimed it would build 100 units of affordable housing? According to the staff report, “No affordable housing units are proposed either in the original or modified proposal.”

The planning department is recommending that commissions deny the request for an extension, noting in the staff report, “Given the totality of considerations, the Department believes the Developer is engaging in land banking at the cost and high risk of County taxpayers.”

Gee, ya think? Can it be that county planners are finally wising up to developers' tricks? And I just about fell out of my chair when I read this part:

“The Department believes this project runs counter to the public desire for less residential development on ag lands, and the need for affordable housing.”

Amazing. The planning department is finally listening to us, and responding appropriately. The question now is whether the planning commission will go along and do the right thing — or sucker under yet again to a land speculator's shibai.

Oh, and I just can't resist this little political tidbit..... Justin Kollar won the most beautiful barong (shirt) competition at Saturday's Kauai Filipino Women's Club Terno Ball, prompting his political opponent, Shaylene Iseri-Carvalho and her entourage to walk out in disgust, and resulting in this "politics makes strange bedfellows" photo. Yes, it seems Councilmen Mel Rapozo and KipuKai Kualii — both stanch Shay supporters — were first and second runner-ups, respectively. Councilman Dickie Chang was emcee. Justin is the one with the biggest trophy.

See also:
Island Breath: Chemlawns NO! Organic Farms YES! 3/13/07
Island Breath: The Garden of Eden 4/19/07
.

EuroVegas to save Spain?

SUBHEAD: Las Vegas billionaire plans to build up to 36,000 room casino hotel complex in Madrid.

By Giles Tremlett on 10 September 2012 for the Guardian -
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/10/eurovegas-madrid-sheldon-adelson-las-vegas)


Image above: Sheldon Adelson, gambling billionaire, at his Venetian casino complex in Las Vegas. From original article.

Half a dozen casinos and 12 huge hotels are expected to emerge from farmland around Madrid over the coming decade after the gambling billionaire Sheldon Adelson confirmed he will build a Las-Vegas-style casino strip on the outskirts of the Spanish capital.

A deal to build Europe's biggest gambling mecca has been struck between Adelson and the regional government of Madrid, bringing with it the promise of tens of thousands of construction jobs.
The Spanish capital beat its arch-rival Barcelona in the battle to win the controversial EuroVegas gambling project.

Adelson, the Las Vegas Sands chairman and chief executive, said in a statement released in Las Vegas late on Friday: "The regional government of Madrid has been a strong advocate for this potential development, and we are appreciative of the energy they have brought to this process.
"Barcelona is an outstanding tourism destination, and choosing Madrid over Barcelona was not an easy selection."

However, he announced that Las Vegas Sands was only willing to finance 35% of the multibillion-euro resort, and that it would demand certain changes in local planning laws.

Adelson, rated America's eighth richest person with a net worth of $24.9bn (£15.6bn) by Forbes magazine, visited both Madrid and Barcelona in recent months as negotiations over where to locate the gambling resort progressed.

The project is expected to be half the size of the famous Las Vegas strip, the four-mile stretch of megacasinos in Nevada. It is also expected to be split into a dozen sectors, built one by one, eventually offering some 36,000 hotel beds, although Adelson held back from confirming details of the project on Friday.

Adelson is hoping to attract visitors from around Europe and areas of the former Soviet Union. Gambling would reportedly account for one-third of income.
While the deal may bring jobs to a country suffering 25% unemployment, it has provoked outrage among an unlikely coalition of opponents, including local Catholic bishops and the indignado protest movement.

Local bishops have warned that the complex will bring gambling addiction, bankruptcies and suicides.
Indignado protesters have pointed to reports of investigations by US authorities into allegations of corruption, dealings with Chinese mafia members and failure to report potential money-launderers.
Neither Las Vegas Sands nor Adelson have been formally accused of any of those things, and the company insists it helps investigators with inquiries.

Adelson is one of the chief financial backers of the Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. His casino empire stretches to Singapore and Macao, where sales are 13% of local GDP. It runs several Las Vegas casinos, but 90% of profits come from Asia.

Madrid's regional president, Esperanza Aguirre, from the liberal wing of the centre-right People's party (PP), has promised to introduce whatever law changes are needed.
.

Zeitgeist Failure

SUBHEAD: The big question is how we will reorganize the activities of a whole culture - to comport with reality.

By James Kunstler on 10 September 2012 for Kunstler.com -
(http://kunstler.com/blog/2012/09/zeitgeist-failure.html)


Image above: Scene on the concourse of the 1964 World's Fair. The NEw York pavilion is to the  right as seen in "Men in Black"- Is this when when America made sense? From (http://gorillasdontblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/new-york-worlds-fair-1964.html).
zeitgeist:
The spirit, attitude, or general outlook of a specific time or period, esp as it is reflected in literature, philosophy, etc
In an age of gross zeitgeist dysfunction -- when untruth, delusion, and deception rule - politics is mere advertising, which is to say surface shimmer playing on the public's wish-fulfillment fantasies. The trouble at this moment in history is that the American public's wishful fantasies are inconsistent with the circumstances that reality offers to us and the choices for action that they present.

President Obama's historical role will be seen as a wish-fulfillment totem for late 20th century progressive liberalism - the first black president. The Democratic Party apotheosized the genial young lawyer with his appealing family in order to demonstrate the triumph of social justice, which was their great struggle of the era. Evidence of that is the striking divergence from the get-go between Mr. Obama's Hope and Change advertising and his sedulous defense of pervasive racketeering at the highest levels of polity once in office.

Otherwise, you must decide whether he was a tool of the giant banks, or a dupe-made-hostage to them, or simply too clueless to understand what was required in 2009 - namely the break-up and reorganization of the banks plus hearty prosecution of their executives for massive swindling (along with reinstatement of the Glass-Steagall Act). I voted for him in 2008, by the way, since the wish-fulfillment motif moved me, and also because of the horrifying McCain-Palin opposition.

In office, then, Mr. Obama quickly proved to be a different breed of porpoise than the voters bargained for. He let the Wall Street privateers run amuck another four years, aided with colossal infusions of conjured-out-of-nothing "money" from the Federal Reserve. He let loose the demons of a high-tech totalitarian "security" state with every sort of electronic surveillance, citizen data-mining, and drone spying that innovation allowed.

He stood silent like a Banana Republic store mannequin after the supreme court decided that corporations could buy elections (he could have pushed loudly for legislation or even a constitutional amendment to redefine corporate "personhood"). And of course, he continued to prosecute the absurd war in Afghanistan where, after nine years, US forces are unable to accomplish the only aims of being there: to control the terrain and to moderate the behavior of the people who live there.

Hence, the appalling spectacle of the Democratic convention last week, with its odor of ideological bankruptcy, stale rhetoric, and empty promises. The party seeks only validation of its cherished fantasy: the social justice of reelecting the first black president. And all it really has to offer is cheerleading to that end - with some social justice table-scraps tossed to the lesser totems of social justice politics: women, assorted ethnic minorities, and gays.

Meanwhile, the "advanced nations" of industrial civilization all spiral into coordinated disintegration, especially in the realm where economy meets finance. Economy is about what we actually do to stay alive: make things, trade things, grow things, run things. Finance is supposed to be about maintaining the flows of accumulated wealth to support these things we do - with a modest service charge for the financiers who do the work. But in the great divorce of truth from reality in our time, finance is only about pretending to maintain these "capital" flows. In fact, it has degenerated into a set of looting operations, swindles, frauds, and political dodges, and it is on the verge of blowing up.

There's a fair chance that global finance (and trade) will blow up this season leading to the US elections. The nations of Europe are stuck in an intractable predicament. The European Union can't control the fiscal operations (taxing and spending) of its sovereign members, and it only pretends to be able to lend them the money to cover the interest payments on their previous loans. That shuck-and-jive is now headed for a climax. But the situation is not materially different in the USA and Japan.

In one way or another, they are bankrupt, too, as are probably most of their commercial banks. China's banks are certainly a fiasco, since they are government-run, with no independent accounting oversight whatsoever. China does have a big cushion of US Treasury holdings, huge stockpiles of industrial metals and cement, and many new tons of recently-acquired gold. But they are also hostage to the bankrupt West's lost appetite for "consumer" goods, and tens of millions of laid-off Chinese factory workers could foment political upheaval in a delicate time of regime transition coming later this year.

The antics of the ECB, the US Federal Reserve, and all the other central banks in conjuring ever more money-out-of-nothing draws us toward that event horizon where faith is lost in a faith-based money system. The only question really is whether wealth destruction (deleveraging, debt default) out-paces currency destruction (inflation). My own guess continues to be that wealth destruction wins that contest, with massive unpayable debt sucked into a black hole, and then all the advanced industrial nations waking up one oddly warm morning to find their standards of living destroyed.

As a political matter in the face of all this, the big question is how we will reorganize daily life - the activities of a whole culture - to comport with the reality of a compressive contraction in economic reality. It also includes the shape and content of the consensus we construct to explain to ourselves what is happening. The obvious epic failure of the two major parties in the USA to even begin this necessary work may propel this country into an historic political convulsion to attend the financial implosion. Imagine, for instance, if the failure of international banks leads to the rapid paralysis of trade supply lines and then to empty shelves in American supermarkets.

People complain about "the size and burden of government," but our problems extend to the size and burden of everything, beginning with the number of human beings now vying to occupy the planet and moving to the size and scale of every activity supporting them. Truthful political leadership would engage in preparing the public for a long "to do" list of necessary tasks - from the return to Main Street economies that will follow the inevitable collapse of WalMart to the reorganization of food production when agri-biz style farming fails from scarcities of cheap oil, phosphates, and capital for revolving loans. Include also the rebuilding of transportation networks not based on cars and airplanes and the painful reconstruction of a monetary and banking system based on the rule of law.

This is the true work of the future: the rebuilding of these systems. All the blather about "jobs" from the presidential convoys is based on looking backward to a way of life that is ending: the age of giant everything, especially corporations. The days of cubicle serfdom are numbered. Useful, gainful work in the decades ahead will be much more about how you fit into your local community. The word "job" may even become obsolete - a curious artifact of the industrial past. Which party is preparing young people for local agriculture and all the value-added activities around it? Which party understands that the national chain-store model of trade is doomed and Main Streets all over America will have to be re-activated? Which party understands that we're in the twilight of mass motoring and commercial aviation? And what are they doing to prepare for the implications of that?

The two doddering parties want to promise more of what we've already got in a world that doesn't have anymore of that to give. The result is likely to be that we will go through all the noisy motions of the 2012 elections only to find ourselves plunged into a political crisis possibly worse than the Civil War.


Sidebar on  How "Smart" We Think We Are

TV commercial seen during the Women's finals of the US Tennis Open:
Cadillac is bragging that they have replaced the old dashboard knobs and toggles with a "smart" iPad-type control system. Has a car company ever done something so fucking stupid? The whole point of knobs and toggles is that you can keep your eyes on the road while adjusting things by feel. An iPad you actually have to look at to see what you're tapping on. Expect a colossal death toll from buyers of the latest Cadillacs in the next couple of years. I suppose there's poetic justice in the automobile age winding down on a note of such supernatural idiocy.
.

The next ten billion years

SUBHEAD: Two future scenarios of our own choosing... the bad one and the good one.

By Ugo Bardi on 9 September 2012 for Cassandra's Legacy -
(http://cassandralegacy.blogspot.it/2012/09/the-next-ten-billion-years.html)


Image above: A peak at the universe. From original article.

It is not surprising that we found the future fascinating; after all, we are all going there. But the future is never what it used to be and it is said that predictions are always difficult, especially those dealing with the future.
Nevertheless, it is possible to study the future, which is something different from predicting it. It is an exercise called "scenario building". Here, let me try a telescopic sweep of scenario building that starts from the remote past and takes us to the remote future over a total range of 20 billion years. While the past is what it was, our future bifurcates into two scenarios; one "good" and the other "bad", all depending on what we'll be doing in the coming years.


The past 10 billion years

- 10 billion years ago. The universe is young, it only has less than four billion years. But it already looks the way it will be for many billion years: galaxies, stars, planets, black holes and much more.
 
- 1 billion years ago. From the debris of ancient supernovas, the solar system has formed around a second generation star, the Sun, about 4.5 billion years ago. The planets that form the system are not very different from those we see today. Earthhas with blue oceans, white clouds and dark brown continents. But there are no plants or animals on the continents, nor fish in the water. Life is all unicellular in the oceans, but its activity has already changed a lot of things: the presence of oxygen in the atmosphere is a result of the ongoing photosynthesis activity.

- 100 million years ago. Plenty of things have been happening on planet Earth. Starting about 550 million years ago, perhaps as a result of the ice age known as "snowball Earth" multicellular life forms have appeared. First, only in the oceans; then, about 400 million years ago, life has colonized the surfaces of the continents creating lush forests and large animals that have populated the Earth for hundreds of millions of years of years. That wasn't uneventful, though. Life nearly went extinct when, 245 million years ago, a giant volcanic eruption in the region we call Siberia today generated the largest known extinction of Earth's history. But the biosphere managed to survive and regrow into the cretaceous period, the age of Dinosaurs.

- 10 million years ago. Dinosaurs have disappeared. They have been wiped out by a new mass extinction, caused probably by a giant asteroid which hit the Earth 65 million years ago. Again, the biosphere has survived and now it prospers again, populated with mammals and birds; including primates. We are in the Miocene period and the Earth has been cooling down over a period of several million years, possibly as the result of the Indian subcontinent having hit Asia and created the Himalayas. That has favored CO2 removal from the atmosphere by weathering and has lowered temperatures. Icecaps have formed both at the North and the South poles for the first time in several hundred million years.

- 1 million years ago. The Earth has considerably cooled down during the period that we call "Pleistocene" and it is now undergoing a series of ice ages and interglacials. Ice ages last for tens of thousands of years, whereas the interglacials are relatively short hot spells, a few thousands of years long. These climatic oscillations are perhaps the element that stimulate the evolution of some primate species which have developed bipedal locomotion. One million years ago, homo erectus and homo abilis can use fire and make simple stone tools.

- 100.000 years ago. The glacial/interglacial cycles continue. The hot spell called the "Eemian" period, about 114,000 years ago, has been short lived and has given way to one of the harshest known glaciations of the recent Earth's history. But humans can survive these conditions. In Europe, the Neanderthals rule while  the species that we call "homo sapiens" already exists in Africa.

- 10.000 years ago. The ice age ends abruptly to give rise to a new interglacial; the period that we call "Holocene." The Neanderthals have disappeared, pushed out of the edge of survival by their "Sapiens" competitors. Climate stabilizes enough for humans to start to practice agriculture in the fertile valleys along the tropical region of Africa and Eurasia, from Egypt to China.

- 1000 years ago. The agricultural age has given rise to the age of empires, fighting for domination of large geographical areas. The human population has been rapidly growing, with the start of a series of cycles of growth and collapse that derive from the overexploitation of the fertile soil. 1000 years ago, the Western World is coming back from one of these periodic collapses and is expanding again during the period we call "Middle Ages".

- 100 years ago. The age of coal has started and has been ongoing for at least two centuries. With it, the industrial revolution has come. Coal and crude oil are the fuels that create a tremendous expansion of humankind in numbers and power. 100 years ago, there are already more than a billion humans on the planet and the population is rapidly heading for the two billion mark. Pollution is still a minor problem that goes largely unrecognized. The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been increasing to near 300 ppm over the 270 ppm which has been the pre-industrial age. This fact is noted by some human scientists, but the long term consequences are not understood.

- 10 years ago. The fossil fuels which have created the industrial age are starting to show signs of depletion and the same is true also for most mineral commodities. The attempt to replace fossil fuels with uranium has not been successful because of the difficulties involved in controlling the technology. Energy production is still increasing, but it shows signs of slowing down. The human population has reached 6 billion and keeps growing, but at reduced rates of growth. The Earth's agricultural system is in full overshoot and the population can only be fed by means of an agricultural-industrial complex based on fossil fuels. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has been growing fast and is now about 370 ppm. Global temperatures have been rising, too, and the problem of global warming has been recognized and considerable efforts are being made to reduce the emission of CO2 and of other greenhouse gases.  

- Today. The world's industrial system seems to be close to stopping its growth and the financial system has been going through a series of collapses. The production of crude oil has been stable during the past few years; but the overall energy production is still increasing because of the rapid growth of coal production. The political situation is chaotic, with continuously erupting minor wars. The human population has reached seven billion. The climate system seems to be on the verge of collapse, with a rapid increase in natural catastrophes all over the world and the near disappearance of the ice cap at the North Pole.The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is almost 400 ppm and keeps increasing.

The future in two scenarios
1.The "bad" scenario.

- 10 years from now. In 2020, the production of "conventional" crude oil has started a historical trend of decline, but an enormous effort has been made to replace it by liquids produced using non conventional sources. Tar sands, shale oil and other "heavy" oil sources, as well as biofuels are being produced in amounts sufficient to stave off the decline. Natural gas production is in decline, but large investments in "shale gas" have so far avoided collapse. Uranium, too has become scarce and several countries which don't have national resources have been forced to close down some of their nuclear plants.

These trends are partially compensated by the still increasing production of coal; which is also increasingly used to produce liquid fuels and other chemicals that once had been obtained from oil. The growth of renewable energy has stalled: there are no more resources to invest in research and development in new technologies and new plants, while a propaganda campaign financed by the oil industry has convinced the public that renewables produce no useful energy and are harmful for the environment.

Another propaganda campaign financed by the same lobbies has stopped all attempts of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. As a result, agriculture has been devastated by climate change and by the high costs of fertilizers and mechanization. The human population starts an epochal reversal of its growing trend, decimated also in reason of the increasing fraction of fertile land which is dedicated to biofuels.

- 100 years from now. In 2100, the human economic system has collapsed and the size of the economy is now a small fraction of what it had been at the beginning of the 21st century.  Resource depletion has destroyed most of the industrial system, while climate change and the associated desertification - coupled with the destruction of the fertile soil - have reduced agriculture to a pale shadow of the industrial enterprise it had become. The collapse of agriculture has caused a corresponding population collapse; now under one billion people.

Most tropical areas have been abandoned because global warming has made them too hot to be habitable by human beings. The rise in sea level caused by global warming has forced the abandonment of a large number of coastal cities, with incalculable economic damage. The economy of the planet has been further weakened by giant storms and climate disasters which have hit about every inhabited place.

Crude oil is not extracted any more in significant amounts and where there still exist gas resources, it is impossible to transport them at long distances because of the decay of the pipeline network and of the flooding of the ports. Only coal is still being extracted and coal fired plants maintain electric power for a reduced industrial activity in several regions of of the North of the planet. Labrador, Alaska, Scandinavia and Northern Siberia see the presence of remnants of the industrial society. Using coal liquefaction, it is still possible to obtain liquid fuels, mostly used for military purposes. The Earth still sees tanks and planes that exchange gunfire against each other.

- 1000 years from now.The industrial society is a thing of the past. Human caused global warming has  generated the release of methane hydrates which have created even more warming. The stopping of the Oceanic thermohaline currents has transformed most of the planet into a hot desert. Almost all large mammals are extinct. Humans survive only in the extreme fringes of land in the North of the planet and in the South, mainly in Patagonia.

For the first time in history, small tribes of humans live on the rapidly de-frosting fringes of the Antarctic continent, living mainly of fishing. In some areas, it is still possible to extract coal and use it for a simple metallurgy that uses the remains of the metals that the 20th century civilization has left. Human being are reduced to a few million people individuals who keep battling each other using old muskets and occasional cannons.

- 10.000 years from now. Planet Earth is still reeling from the wave of global warming that had started many thousands of years before. The atmosphere still contains large amounts of greenhouse gases generated by human activity and by the release of methane hydrates. The continents are mostly deserts, and the same is true for oceans, reduced to marine deserts by the lack of oxygenating currents. Greenland is nearly ice-free and that's true also for Antarctica, which has lost most of its ice. Human beings are extinct, together with most vertebrates and trees. Only bushes and small size land vertebrates survive in the remote northern and southern fringes of continents.

- 100.000 from now. The planet is showing signs of recovery. Temperatures have stabilized and silicate erosion have removed a large fraction of the carbon dioxide that had accumulated in the atmosphere. Land plants and trees show some sign of returning.

- 1 milion years from now. The planet has partly recovered. The planetary tectonic cycles have re-absorbed most of the CO2 which had created the great burst of warming of long before. Temperature has gone down rapidly and polar ice caps have returned. The return of ice has restarted the thermohaline currents: oceanic waters are oxygenated again. Life - those species that had survived the warming disaster - are thriving again and re-colonizing the tropical deserts - which are fast disappearing.

- 10 million years from now. Earth is again the lush blue-green planet it used to be, full of life, animals and forests. From the survivors of the great warming, a new explosion of life has been generated. There are again large herbivores and carnivores, as well as large trees, even though none of them looks like the creatures which had populated the Earth before the catastrophe. In Africa, some creatures start using chipped stones for hunting. In time, they develop the ability of creating fire and of building stone structures. They develop agriculture, sea-going ships and ways of recording their thoughts using symbols. But they never develop an industrial civilization for lack of fossil fuels, all burned by humans millions of years before them.

- 100 milion years from now. Planet Earth is again under stress. The gradual increase in solar irradiation is pushing climate towards a new hot era. The same effect is generated by the gradual formation of a new supercontinent generated by continental drift. Most of the land becomes a desert - all intelligent creatures disappear. There starts a general decline of vertebrates, unable to survive in a progressively hotter planet.

- 1 billion years from now. The Earth has been sterilized by the increasing solar heat. Just traces of single celled life still survive underground.

- 10 billion years from now. The sun has expanded and it has become so large that it has absorbed and destroyed the Earth. Then, it has collapsed in a white dwarf. The galaxy and the whole universe move slowly to extinction with the running down of the energy generated by the primeval big bang.

2.The "good" scenario

- Ten years from now. In 2020, fossil fuel depletion has generated a global decline of production. That, in turn, has led to international treaties directed to ease the replacement of fossil fuels with renewable energy. Treaties are also enacted with the purpose of minimizing the use of coal. The production and the use of biofuels is forbidden everywhere and treaties force producers to direct all the agricultural production towards food for humans.

The existing nuclear plants make full use of the uranium in the warheads that had been accumulated during the cold war. Research on nuclear fusion continues, with the hope that it will provide useful energy in 50 years. Even with these actions, global warming continues and agriculture is badly damaged by droughts and erosion. Population growth stops and widespread famines occur. Governments enact fertility reduction measures in order to contain population. Nevertheless, the economy does not show signs of collapse, stimulated by the demand for renewable plants.

- A hundred years from now. The measures taken at the beginning of the 21st century have borne fruit. Now, almost 1% of the surface of the planet is covered by solar panels of the latest generations which produce energy with efficiency of the order of 50%. In the north, wind energy is used, as well as energy from ocean currents, tides, and waves. The production of renewable electrical energy keeps growing and it has surpassed anything that was done in the past using primitive technologies based on fossil fuels. No such fuels are extracted any longer and doing so is considered a crime punishable with re-education.

The industrial economy is undergoing rapid changes, moving to abandon the exploitation of dwindling resources of rare metals, using the abundant energy available to exploit the abundant elements of the Earth's crust. The human society is now completely based on electric energy, also for transportation. Electric vehicles move along roads and rails, electric ships move across the oceans and electric airship navigate the air. The last nuclear fission plants have been closed for lack of uranium fuel around 2050, they were not needed any more, anyway. Research on nuclear fusion continues with the hope that it will provide usable energy in 50 years.

Despite the good performance of the economy, the ecosystem is still under heavy stress because of the large amounts of greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere during the past centuries. Agriculture is still reeling from the damage done by erosion and climate change. The human population is in rapid, but controlled, decline under the demographic measures enacted by governments. It is now less than 4 billion humans and famines are a thing of the past.  With the returning prosperity, humans are restarting the exploration of space that they were forced to abandon at the start of the 21st century.

- 1000 years from now. In the year 3000 A.D. the ecosystems of the planet have completely recovered from the damage done by human activities during the second millennium. The planet's climate is now fully under human control. A sophisticated planetary control system manages solar irradiation by means of space mirrors and the concentration of greenhouse gases by means of CO2 absorbing/desorbing plants.

The planet is managed as a giant garden, optimizing its biological productivity. The Sahara desert is now a forest and the thermohaline currents pump oxygen in the northern regions, full of life of all kinds. The solar and wind plants used during the previous millennium have been mostly dismantled, although some are still kept as a memory of the old times. Most of the energy used by humankind is now generated by space stations which capture solar energy and beam it to the ground in forms easily usable by humans. Research in controlled fusion energy continues with the hope that it will produce usable energy in 500 years.

Humans are now less than one billion, they have optimized both their numbers and their energy use and they need enormously less than they had needed in the more turbulent ages of one thousand years before. The development of artificial intelligence is in full swing and practically all tasks that once had been in the hands of humans is now in the "hands" of sophisticated robotic systems. These robots have colonized the solar system and humans now live in underground cities on the Moon. The new planetary intelligence starts considering the idea of terraforming Mars and Venus. The first antimatter powered interstellar spaceships have started their travel to far away stars.

- 10.000 years from now. There are now less than a billion human beings on Earth who live in splendid cities immersed in the lush forest that the planet has become. Some of them work as a hobby on controlled nuclear fusion which they hope will produce usable energy in a few thousand years.
The New Intelligence has now started terraforming Mars. It involves similar methods as those used for controlling the Earth's climate: giant mirrors and CO2 producing plants that control the Martian atmosphere, increasing its pressure and temperature. The terraforming of Venus has also started with similar methods: giant screens that lower the planetary temperatures and immense flying plants that transform CO2 into oxygen and solid carbon.

That will take a lot of time, but the New Intelligence is patient. It is also creating new races of solid state beings living on the asteroids and orbiting around the Sun. The exploration of the galaxy is in progress, with spaceships from the solar system now reaching a "sphere" of about a thousand light years from the sun.

- 100.000 years from now. About 500 million humans live on Earth - mostly engaged in art, contemplation, and living full human lives. Nobody knows any longer what "controlled nuclear fusion" could mean. Mars is now colonized by Earth's plants, which are helping to create an atmosphere suitable for life; it is now a green planet, covered with oceans and lush forests. Several million human beings live there. The temperature of Venus has been considerably lowered, although still not enough for life to take hold of its surface. The exploration of the galaxy is in full swing. Other galactic intelligences are encountered.

- A million years from now. Venus, Earth and Mars are now lush and green; all three full of life. Mercury has been dismantled to provide material for transforming the solar system into a single intelligence system that links a series of creatures. There are statites orbiting around the sun, solid state lifeforms living on asteroids and remote moons, ultra-resistent creatures engineered to live in the thick atmosphere of Jupiter and of the other giant planets. Humans, living on the green planets, have become part of this giant solar network. The other extreme of the Galaxy has been now reached by probes coming from the solar system.

- 10 milion years from now. The New Intelligence is expanding over the Galaxy. The Green planets are now the place of evolution tests and the Neanderthals now live on Mars, whereas dinosaurs have been recreated on a Venus where the planetary control system has recreated conditions similar to those of the Jurassic on Earth.

- In 100 million years from now. Controlling temperatures over the three green planets of the Solar System has become a complex task because of the increasing solar radiation. Mirrors are not enough any more and it has been necessary to move the planets farther away from the sun; which is now the preferred system for climate control. The statites that form the main part of the solar intelligence now surround the sun almost completely in a series of concentric spheres.

- In a billion years from now. The solar radiation has increased so much that it has been necessary to move the green planets very far away. One year lasts now as 50 of the "natural" Earth years as they were long before. But these are no problems for the Solar Intelligence, now just a small part of the Galactic intelligence. The three green planets are three jewels of the Solar System.

- In ten billion years from now. The sun has collapsed in a weak white dwarf and all the planets that orbit around it are now frozen to death. The Galaxy has lost most of its suns and the universe is entering its last stage of expansion which will lead it to become a frozen darkness. The Galactic Intelligence looks at a nearly dark galaxy. It is now the moment. The Intelligence says, "Let there be light" And there is light.
.

Hungary denies GMOs & IMF

SUBHEAD: A 1000 acres of Monsanto GMOs corn plowed under. International Monetary Fund deal rejected.

By Raul Ilargi Meijer on 7 September 2012 for the Automatic Earth-  
(http://theautomaticearth.com/Finance/hungary-throws-out-monsanto-and-the-imf.html)
 
Image above: Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban at podium. From (http://www.huembwas.org/GB/VOCMF/2007/VOCMF%20reception.htm).
 
I don't know about you, but I would label my personal knowledge of Hungary as wanting, if not painfully incomplete. It's not an easy country to come to grips with, not least of all of course because Hungarian doesn't look like any western language we know with the possible exception of Finnish. I did visit just after the Wall came down, and remember huge contrasts, almost paradoxes, between rural poverty and a capital, Budapest, that was much richer than other capitals such as Prague, a leftover of Budapest's status as meeting place between western and eastern diplomats and businessmen.

The riches were not for all, though, the city center was full of beggars and panhandlers, mostly Roma. To keep up the paradox, Mercedes sold more luxury models in Hungary than just about anywhere else back then, reportedly mostly also to Roma; just not the same.

In the years since, precious little attention has been and is being devoted to the former eastern bloc countries in the Anglo press. We know most of the countries are now members of the European Union, but only a few have been allowed to enter the hallowed grounds of the eurozone.

One thing I did pick up on last year was the news that Hungary's PM Victor Orbán had thrown chemical, food and seed giant Monsanto out of the country, going as far as to plow under 1000 acres of land. Now, I have little patience for Monsanto, infamous for many products ranging from Agent Orange to Round-Up, nor for its ilk, from DuPont to Sygenta, all former chemical companies that have at some point decided they could sell more chemicals than ever before by applying them on and inside everyone's daily food. Patenting nature itself seems either unworthy of mankind or its grandest achievement. I don't care much for either one. So Orbán (who has a two-thirds majority in parliament, by the way) has my tentative support on this one.

This is from July 22, 2011, International Business Times:

In an effort to rid the country of Monsanto's GMO products, Hungary has stepped up the pace. This looks like its going to be another slap in the face for Monsanto. A new regulation was introduced this March which stipulates that seeds are supposed to be checked for GMO before they are introduced to the market. Unfortunately, some GMO seeds made it to the farmers without them knowing it.

Almost 1000 acres of maize found to have been grown with genetically modified seeds have been destroyed throughout Hungary deputy state secretary of the Ministry of Rural Development Lajos Bognar said. The GMO maize has been ploughed under, said Lajos Bognar, but pollen has not spread from the maize, he added.

Unlike several EU members, GMO seeds are banned in Hungary. The checks will continue despite the fact that seed traders are obliged to make sure that their products are GMO free, Bognar said. During their investigation, controllers have found Pioneer and Monsanto products among the seeds planted. 

It's remarkably hard to find sources on this, ironically. It’s even harder, even more ironically, to find anything that mentions the Wikileaks report on the connections between the US government and the chemical/seed industry. Which is curious, in my opinion; it's not as if there's nothing newsworthy in the topic. Just about the only thing I could find was this from Anthony Gucciardi at NaturalSociety.com.

The United States is threatening nations who oppose Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) crops with military-style trade wars, according to information obtained and released by the organization WikiLeaks. Nations like France, which have moved to ban one of Monsanto’s GM corn varieties, were requested to be ‘penalized’ by the United States for opposing Monsanto and genetically modified foods. The information reveals just how deep Monsanto’s roots have penetrated key positions within the United States government, with the cables reporting that many U.S. diplomats work directly for Monsanto. [..]

Perhaps the most shocking piece of information exposed by the cables is the fact that these U.S. diplomats are actually working directly for biotech corporations like Monsanto. The cables also highlight the relationship between the U.S. and Spain in their conquest to persuade other nations to allow for the expansion of GMO crops. Not only did the Spanish government secretly correspond with the U.S. government on the subject, but the U.S. government actually knew beforehand how Spain would vote before the Spanish biotech commission reported their decision regarding GMO crops.

It doesn't look like Orbán and Hungary have a lot of support in their fight against Monsanto and GMO in general on the political front. But that still does little to explain the radio silence.
There was more international reporting earlier this year, when Orbán again faced up to two other major forces, in this instance the IMF and the EU. On January 1, the Hungarian parliament and president signed a new constitution into law. And it contains a number of things that the Troika members don't like. In particular, they are probably at odds with taxes levied on bank transactions, and especially central bank transactions. Not the kind of thing the IMF is likely to ever agree with. It all gets clad in protesting (the EU even threatens with courts) the independence under fire of the central bank, the media and other parts of Hungarian society.

The IMF and EU, like the tandem team of Monsanto and Washington before them, act like schoolyard bullies. It's become their standard MO, and it usually works. Portraits of Orbán as a fool, a reckless idiot and a dangerous populist, on par with that of Hugo Chavez or newly found international enemy Rafael Correa, are much easier to find than those links to Wikileaks Monsanto cables. It would be good to see Orbán continue to stand up to the IMF bullies, but he may not have that choice. They can simply financially bleed him dry, like they have so many other countries and their leaders. It's a time tested model.

So maybe we’ll have to do with a good and hearty chuckle, and enjoy his announcement yesterday.

Hungary's prime minister has long had a testy relationship with the International Monetary Fund — and on Thursday he used Facebook to unfriend the agency and reject its allegedly tough loan conditions.

Prime Minister Viktor Orban said in a video message on his official Facebook page that Hungary could not accept pension cuts, the elimination of a bank tax, fewer public employees and other conditions in exchange for an IMF loan that other officials have said could be about €15 billion ($18.9 billion). The IMF's list of conditions, Orban said, " contains everything that is not in Hungary's interests."

Orban's announcement took the markets by surprise, in part because just a day earlier he had said loan negotiations with the IMF and the European Union were going according to schedule and both sides were willing to reach an agreement. [..]

In late 2008, under a Socialist government, Hungary became the first EU country to receive an IMF-led bailout. The Orban government, however, decided not to renew the loan agreement in 2010 so it could implement its economic policies without IMF control. But the increasing weakness of the forint, the Hungarian currency, and investors' growing loss of trust in the country's economy made the government abruptly change its mind late last year, when it again sought IMF help.

Basically, what the IMF demands is what it has always demanded through the years from countries it lends money to: cut pensions, cut the public sector, cut benefits yada yada, and then privatize, open markets, and open financial systems, so international operating conglomerates can move in and divvy up the spoils - "create a more 'business friendly' environment to boost growth" -. The IMF is the poster child for disaster capitalism, no matter how you twist and turn it. And Orbán can see clearly what is being done to Greece, which is just around the corner from Hungary.

A “list of horrors”. That’s how Hungary’s prime minister Viktor Orbán described on Thursday the conditions given by the IMF / EU for a deal, via a video on his Facebook page. [..]
Orban blamed the “long list” of onerous conditions that had, supposedly, been leaked to Magyar Nemzet, a slavishly pro-government daily, on Wednesday. The list contains a number of Orbán’s most sacred political themes, including cuts in pensions, family allowances and transport perks, an increase in the age of retirement, the introduction of a property tax, the abolition of the bank and financial transaction taxes, and modifications to the flat-rate, personal income tax regime.

And here's a bit more:

Hungary threw hopes for a new loan to prop up its sagging economy into disarray on Thursday as Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban rejected what he called unacceptable IMF conditions, crushing prospects for a fast agreement. Orban, in a video posted on his Facebook page, cited demands from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a raft of changes that he said were too high a price for Hungary to pay.

"From cutting pensions to reducing bureaucracy to scrapping the bank tax and the funds to be made available to banks, everything is in there that's not in Hungary's interest," Orban said. "The parliamentary group meeting (of the ruling Fidesz party) took the view, and I personally agree with it, that at this price, this will not work," he added. [..]

To reverse that momentum, Orban is pushing a 300 billion forint ($1.33 billion) job saving plan, partly funded by a new tax on central bank operations, a key sticking point in the IMF talks, which the European Central Bank has also criticised. [..]

"Junk"-rated Hungary faces a repayment hump in the next five quarters, with the equivalent of €4.6 billion euros falling due from its previous IMF/EU bailout alone.
 
It's enough of a David vs Goliath fight, or a Little Red Riding Hood vs the Wolf, to make one question the bullies. Now, I don't really know Victor Orbán, all I know is western media descriptions of him, not a very reliable source, and he could well be a bully himself. But I still like the Little Red Riding Hood story (and dislike Monsanto and the IMF) enough to give him the benefit of the doubt for now.

And besides, it's as refreshing as it is high time to talk about something else than Greece or Spain. We'll have to get back to them soon enough, after Draghi's unlimited buying bailout boondoggle yesterday
.

Evolutionary Nuns

SUBHEAD: The importance of Catholic women in shaping our culture following the collapse of industrial culture.  

By Carolyn Baker on 7 September 2012 for Speaking Truth to Power  
(http://carolynbaker.net/2012/09/07/the-impact-of-evolutionary-nuns-on-shaping-the-next-culture-by-carolyn-baker)

 
Image above: Sister pat Farrell speaks at LCWR conference in St. Louis in Augsut 2012. From (http://saccvi.blogspot.com/2012/08/st-louis-sister-city-group-blesses-lcwr.html).
  


In early May of this year, the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) in the United States began receiving reprimands from the Vatican for their “radical feminist views.” This historic development has been widely reported in mainstream news by both secular and religious media. In this article, I want to take a closer look at these “evolutionary nuns” and their impact in current time and on the gifts they offer for shaping of a post-industrial culture. They understand that every institution is crumbling around them, particularly, the hierarchical and patriarchal bastion of which they are part, the Roman Catholic Church.

One might be tempted to question why such evolutionary women remain in this institution, and there are a plethora of reasons why they do, but perhaps the most momentous is their commitment to society’s marginalized and through the church, their ability to provide services for those who might never receive them otherwise.

For a detailed history of LCWR and its relationship with the Vatican, the reader may view an address by Sister Mary Hughes, former president of LCWR, to the National Press Club, August 16, 2012 following its conference in St. Louis.

LCWR not only constitutes an ominous threat to the Vatican, but it provides a model, in my opinion, for all who are exploring ways in which humanity can reconstitute itself and forge a post-industrial culture that radically departs from the paradigm of industrial civilization. I consider these women evolutionary because they refuse to perpetuate the old paradigm and are doggedly committed to equality, humanitarianism, democracy, and earth-based spirituality. They offer the world a treasure-trove of knowledge and experience about living in community, sharing, service, earth literacy, eco-spirituality, and let us not forget, unconditional love.

The mission statement of LCWR reads:

The purpose of the conference shall be to promote a developing understanding and living of religious life by:
  • assisting its members personally and communally to carry out more collaboratively their service of leadership in order to accomplish further the mission of Christ in today’s world.
  • fostering dialogue and collaboration among religious congregations within the church and in the larger society.
  • developing models for initiating and strengthening relationships with groups concerned with the needs of society, thereby maximizing the potential of the conference for effecting change.


To understand why this group is so threatening to the Vatican, allow me to indulge in a bit of history. The Second Vatican Council convened under Pope John XXIII from 1962-1965 at which time, stunning changes occurred in the Roman Catholic Church. A number of landmark decisions were made at Vatican II, and among them, a dramatic altering of the liturgy and a desire to be engaged in deep dialog with the contemporary world.

This conference also marked the beginning of the end for “in-habited” nuns. For the most part, black and white habits came off as nuns donned polyester pants, pastel colors, and no longer covered their heads. Nuns now looked almost like other women. I say “almost” because they still retained modesty in their dress and rarely wore make-up or jewelry.

It was the 1960s during the era of the Vietnam War, the Civil Rights movement, and the beginning of the women’s movement. The emphasis among nuns turned increasingly toward social justice. They still taught in colleges and public high schools, but now they were running soup kitchens; providing food, clothing, and shelter for the poor; working in hospitals, counseling victims of all manner of abuse and injustice, protesting the war, and opening up non-profits everywhere.

Daniel and Phillip Berrigan, two of America’s most famous activist priests, committed themselves to a life of protest. Phillip left the priesthood and married, and his daughter, Frida, a former nun, today works with World Policy Institute, protesting war, Pentagon policies, and US imperialism.

As the condition of the ecosystems worsened in the 1990s, one priest in particular, Thomas Berry, student of French philosopher and Jesuit priest, Teilhard de Chardin, began writing and speaking passionately about the fate of the earth and humanity’s responsibility to know and live the earth’s story. Many students of Berry and de Chardin began devoting their lives to deep ecology and eco-spirituality. Among them, Miriam MacGillis, who founded Genesis Farm in New Jersey where ongoing education in the earth’s story endures and flourishes today.

As the farm’s website reads, “Genesis Farm is rooted in a belief that the Universe, Earth, and all reality are permeated by the presence and power of that ultimate Holy Mystery that has been so deeply and richly expressed in the world’s spiritual traditions. We try to ground our ecological and agricultural work in this deep belief. This Sacred Mystery, known by so many religious names, is the common thread in our efforts.”

Before his death in 2009, Berry had been working closely with Brian Swimme, a mathematical cosmologist on the faculty of California Institute of Integral Studies, and together they wrote The Universe Story: From The Primordial Flaring Forth To The Ecozoic Era: A Celebration Of The Unfolding Of The Cosmos (1994).

Many nuns and some priests, such as Matthew Fox, have been deeply influenced by the work of MacGillis, Berry, and Swimme and are applying “Universe Story” principles in their lives and communities. Many have taken permaculture courses, are creating flourishing organic gardens, and living lives radically committed to sustainability and simplicity.

To say that they are appalled with climate change and humanity’s unwillingness to tackle it head-on does not come close to the pain these women and men feel as they witness the extinction of species, deadly extreme weather, paralyzing droughts, and the decimation of oceans, forests, soil, lakes, rivers, streams.

As mentioned above, representing 57,000 US nuns, LCWR held its national conference in St. Louis this month to discuss its response to the Vatican’s demands. Its keynote speaker was visionary and author on topics of evolutionary consciousness, Barbara Marx Hubbard, who opined that the current reprimand by the Vatican is actually an act of grace which calls the Sisters to become more of who they are, continuing to serve the world in myriad functions and places, and to speak truth to power in both government and the church.

“I see you,” she said, “as the ones who have the greatest capacity for facilitating what is emergent as evolutionary leaders. You are the pioneers and prophets of the future whose flame of expectancy is sparking the passion and hope needed in a world looking for fire.”

Many different kinds of religious communities have sustained themselves throughout history in the midst of wars, persecution, economic depressions, and societal collapse. We can learn enormous lessons from all of them, but in our time, perhaps the most vibrant and functional model would be the evolutionary Sisters of whom I am writing here. One does not need to be religious or even believe in a higher power in order to align with their mission or benefit from their expertise.

I believe that in an increasingly chaotic world—a world deluged by loss, disaster, violence, hunger, thirst, interpersonal conflict, illness, and injury, evolutionary nuns will be some of our most skilled leaders and organizers. Not only are they excellent strategists, but for the most part, they offer a calm, collaborative presence that joins people together in cooperative tasks in both acute and chronic high-stress situations. Among them one senses a deep well of inner wisdom cultivated by years of personal contemplation and community interaction.

In July, 2012 I had the privilege of being one of three presenters for the Sisters Of The Earth conference at St. Mary of The Woods, Indiana. These sisters describe themselves as “an informal network of women who share a deep concern for the ecological and spiritual crises of our times and who wish to support one another in work toward healing the human spirit and restoring the Earth’s life support systems.” Not all are members of LCWR, and not all women attending the conference were nuns, but they wholeheartedly support LCWR’s mission and certainly are aligned with its struggle with the Vatican.

Members of Sisters Of The Earth are deeply involved not only with social justice issues, but with local organic food efforts, permaculture, the Transition movment, raising awareness on climate change, economic justice, and sustainable living. In fact, one of my co-presenters at the conference was organic farmer, professor, and agrarian feminist, Nettie Wiebe, who spoke to the group on Food Sovereignty. Also presenting by Skype was Helena Norberg-Hodge, film maker and moderator of the documentary “The Economics Of Happiness.”

As I spoke to the Sisters about the collapse of industrial civilization as a rite of passage for humanity—as a spiritual and emotional practice which we must begin now and continue going forward, they were overwhelmingly receptive. In fact, I was inundated with their resonance and gratitude. Of all the audiences to whom I have presented my work on the topic of collapse in the past five years, this one displayed the most unequivocal comprehension of any.

But on a more personal note, I must add that being in the presence of evolutionary nuns is a profoundly heartwarming experience. One feels accepted, appreciated, seen, heard, and held in their palpable warmth and affection.

What will be the outcome of the struggle between evolutionary nuns and a crumbling Vatican? And furthermore, why do I use the word “crumbling” to describe this formidable institution?

Quite frankly, the Vatican is reeling financially under the strain of myriad sexual abuse lawsuits during the past decade and more recently, a growing Vatican bank scandal threatens to bring additional economic stress and very negative publicity. Obviously, these realities make their attack on evolutionary nuns seem all the more ludicrous. While many priests are sympathetic to the cause of their evolutionary sisters, the Roman Catholic Church is nevertheless, a male-dominated institution fraught with hypocrisy and corruption.

To put it quite bluntly: Men in dresses, whose status has been stained by rampant child sexual abuse within their ranks and now a Vatican bank scandal, presume to chastise American nuns for not being more vocally opposed to abortion, contraception, and gay marriage. Clearly, this conflict exceeds theology or even gender. It is nothing less than a clash of paradigms as diametrically opposed as one can imagine.

The LCWR is in no way seeking to leave the church at the same time that it is aware of the challenges it brings to the church by way of its service to the marginalized. For example, members do not support abortion or contraception per se, yet they may find themselves providing services for and supporting emotionally and spiritually, women who are struggling with these issues. Likewise, an evolutionary Sister, being well aware of the church’s position on homosexuality and gay marriage, may find herself serving members of the LGBT community without judgment or condemnation. These social issues were specifically mentioned in the Vatican’s reprimand in which it explicitly chastised American nuns for not speaking out more passionately against abortion, contraception, and gay marriage.

Rather than leave the church, however, the Sisters of LCWR wish to continue dialog with the Vatican and see what unfolds in the short term. Indeed, they are pondering what might happen if dialog fails, and we can be certain that whatever their Plan B or Plan C might be, they will remain committed to unity and employ methods that do not judge or attack the hierarchy.

What I find fascinating is that evolutionary nuns are not obsessing about their future or the outcome of this conflict. They are protecting themselves financially, legally, and logistically in every way possible, but as Barbara Marx Hubbard suggested, this controversy is not a tragedy, but an act of grace for them. Support for their cause in mainstream media and in the laity of the Catholic Church is overwhelming. I wish to join that chorus of support because from my perspective, evolutionary nuns bring to an unraveling civilization an incisive awareness of the demise and its myriad causes, as well as extraordinary insights for creating a more just, sustainable, whole, and humane post-industrial culture..

Food gardens in Honduras

SUBHEAD: The garden is organic and requires no ploughing, keeping all the carbon stored by trees and soil intact. By Wayne Roberts on 6 September 2012 for Energy Bulletin - (http://www.energybulletin.net/stories/2012-09-06/forest-gardens-honduras-make-best-two-worlds) Image above: A tropical food forest in Thailand. From (http://permaculturedesigns.blogspot.com/2009_01_01_archive.html).

The drought that is parching the harvest in several of the world’s most productive breadbaskets is the summer’s hottest global food story – and chillingly accompanies the season’s hottest archaeological finding.

Archaeology, by the way, no longer relies on digging for pottery and bones in caves and valleys. It can also use computer-generated climate models, and one of these has allowed desk scientists to break one of the great historical mysteries of the Western hemisphere: the sudden collapse of the Mayan empire of Central America roughly 1,300 years ago.

Turns out, according to U.S. climate modeller Benjamin Cook, that chopping down the region’s forests to grow corn and burn lime to make cement-style blocks for temples caused a drought.

Once the region lost its dark forest canopy, which absorbed the sun’s heat, that heat bounced back into the atmosphere, evaporating the clouds that used to drop the rain needed for an empire entirely dependent on corn.

History seems to be repeating itself for the second of the Western hemisphere’s great empires entirely dependent on a food supply centred around corn and an energy system bent on deforestation.

But what I saw in Honduras last week confirms there is life after plantation-style fields of corn. It just takes a complete rethink of the idea that forests are about wilderness and fields are about food.

So here’s the new paradigm: while green city planners push the notion that urban trees are aesthetic, psychologically calming and good for air quality, they may be only half right. The new appreciation, which looks really old, comes from groups like T.O.’s Not Far from the Tree, which views trees not just as a way to relate to nature but as actual food security providers.

I saw evidence of the proposition that a tree can produce as much food as a small garden in the mountain ranges around Yorito, Honduras.

If Yorito, a two-hour drive north of the capital, gets on the tourist map for forest gardens, it will be the town’s first exposure to the wider world. The nearby mountain villages I visited are another two-hour lurching jeep drive over rib-crunching dirt and gravel roads. (Note to self: never berate high-quality country roads again.)

In Yorito I meet one of the town’s leading micro-entrepreneurs, Nelba Velasquez, who offers us and other visitors excellent meals in her living room restaurant, much of the food from her quarter-acre forest garden.

The first thing I notice in that garden is that the temperature drops about 5 degrees, not just from the shade of the trees but also the from the evaporation of cool water from broadleaf trees. Here, in one overgrown parcel of land, is a beautiful and scrumptious answer to climate chaos, hunger and the chronic-disease pandemic created by deficiencies of micronutrients suffered by rich and poor alike.

Here is my count of what fits in her backyard besides a hammock, a clothesline, a baking oven for bread, a catchment basin for rainwater, two heaps of Japanese-style super-powered compost called bokachi, a woodpile, a raised-bed vegetable garden and a showroom for landscape plants: four avocado trees, two specimens of two different kinds of guava trees, a papaya tree, a mandarin orange and a lemon tree, a tree bearing yellow Nanci berries for juice, a plum tree, 60 coffee plants, a tamarind and an allspice tree.

Did I almost forget to mention 10 varieties of banana?

The entire garden is organic and requires no ploughing, which keeps all the carbon stored by trees and in the soil intact, a powerful measure to mitigate global warming.

Velasquez attributes this diversity to a personality quirk. “I always want to diversify everything. My hands are in everything,” she says.

She’s also on the local public health board and is treasurer of her local “cial” (farmer research team), which promotes seed diversity as a tool of empowerment for low-income communities. Forest gardens and fruit trees sprout among the hilltops dominated by beans and corn wherever cial chapters flourish.

This kind of growing is, I believe, also the next big thing in North America’s local food movement. Seattle claims to have done it first. The folks in Toronto tending the apples, plums, apricots and sweet cherries in the Ben Nobleman Community Orchard are on the same page. And viewing trees as food sources adds a distinct value and puts a new spin, and new responsibility, on Toronto’s poorly funded tree-planting programs.

As my solar engineer friend Greg Allen likes to say, we don’t need a prophet to lead us out of the wilderness; we need a prophet to lead us back to the wilderness.

.

Time to Take Inventory

SUBHEAD: In case of a crisis, whether related problems with weather, finance, or transportation, will you have food?  

By Sharon Astyk on 6 September 2012 for Casaubon's Book - (http://scienceblogs.com/casaubonsbook/2012/09/06/time-to-take-inventory)

  

Image above: Cutaway diagram of root cellar. From (http://scienceblogs.com/casaubonsbook/2012/09/06/time-to-take-inventory/).

 
End of summer is a really good time to sit down and look at your preparations and your food storage and take inventory. What have you put by? What do you still need more of? What did you use over the last year? What did you have too much of? Whither from here? September is National Emergency Preparedness month, so now is the time to think – am I ready for the next crisis (do you even have to ask whether there will be one?)

If you’ve been working on this, but you don’t feel you are ready, here are some questions to ask yourself, and some possible remedies if things aren’t where you want them to be yet.

1. Do I have staple foods that I can rely on as the basis of my meals? A staple is a nutritious starch that contains some protein as well, and that can meet most of your needs. It could be a grain – many Americans rely on bread for our staple starch. But it can also be oatmeal, corn (if you are primarily relying on corn, it must be corn that is nixtamalized, so that you won’t get a major nutritional deficiency – you only have to worry about this if you are mostly eating corn, not if you eat an occasional meal of tortillas – so if you are storing whole corn, know how to process it, and if you are buying cornmeal, buy masa, not plain corn meal), barley, quinoa – or root crops. You can also rely primarily on potatoes, sweet potatoes, rutabagas, turnips and other roots, or a combination of those.
You can order bulk grains online or through a coop or whole foods. This time of year, you can often get a 50lb sack of potatoes or sweet potatoes quite cheaply. Ethnic markets often have good deals on grains as well. Don’t forget popcorn and pasta.

Here are a couple of posts about staple foods: http://sharonastyk.com/2008/07/17/the-storage-life-of-grains-major-and-minor/
http://sharonastyk.com/2008/03/11/living-the-staple-diet/

2. Do I have protein foods that can supplement my staples? This is not as important as the staples – if you had to, you could get along quite well with just a starch for a while (many people all over the world are forced to do that by high food prices most of the time), but you wouldn’t enjoy it. And diabetics, hypoglycemics and others would struggle with this. For most people with normal diets, you need about 1/3 to 1/4 protein dense foods.

What are some choices here? The traditional choice is some kind of legume – beans, split peas, lentils, cowpeas. You could buy dry milk – mixed with oatmeal, or into flour in a dairy bread recipe, that would be enough to sustain you, but it gets kind of boring. You could can your own meats and fish, or buy pre canned meat and fish that your family likes if you like meat. You could also add seeds – sunflower, flax, pumpkin seeds, or nuts like almonds or filberts. Powdered eggs don’t taste very good, but they will allow you to bake, and add necessary protein. Or perhaps you have eggs, if you just store enough chicken feed. What you do is up to you and your budget. Think about foods you know your family will eat and that they like.

3. Do I have some fruits and vegetables to add flavor, fiber and nutrition? The two hardest to cover vitamins are vitamin C and A. So choosing C and A rich fruits and vegetables to add to your storage reduces the danger of both nutritional deficiency and constipation. For vitamin A, canned pumpkin, squash or sweet potatoes, or fresh stored orange vegetables are the best option. For vitamin C, dried elderberries or rose hips are an excellent source. You can and should also have some seed that can be sprouted for fresh green vegetables if you live in a place where you can’t easily go out and forage a safe, unsprayed supply of greens (dandelions, plantain, chicory, etc…) all year ’round. Or you should have them if you don’t know how to recognize those foods. Wheat seeds are easy to sprout, but you might prefer broccoli, radish or others. These can be bought online or at a supermarket or health food store. I would recommend more vegetables and fruits as well – either dried, canned or kept in cold storage.

Now is the perfect time to dry and can fresh fruits, garden vegetables, even greens that are in abundance at local markets and in your garden (and wild in your yard). In an emergency, you will be grateful for all the dietary diversity you can get.

4. Fat. You need some cooking oil. You probably already have preferences on this, but most oils will keep a couple of years in a cool dark place. Oh, and everyone will probably want some salt (salt is necessary for life, so buy a few boxes) and sweetener. These are cheap and useful at making food palatable. Add in as many inexpensive spices as you can afford, or as many home-dried herbs as you can gather. These make the difference between survival and misery. You may want some condiments as well – soy sauce, tobasco, homemade salsa, nuoc mam, berbere, harissa, chutney, etc… Almost all of these can be made at home or purchased.

4. Do I have the basic ingredients of making meals we eat? Think about what you actually eat for breakfast, lunch and dinnner. Do you like granola? Well, then you need some oats, nuts or seeds for crunch, maybe a bit of honey and oil. Can you not imagine a meal without bread? Make sure you have yeast and salt. Think about what you need in terms of the things that make you happy.

5. Do I have water stored? This is an easy one – go raid your neighbor’s recycling bins for soda bottles and fill the bottles with water. If you don’t plan to rotate them every few months, add a drop of bleach to each one. All done. Now make sure you have something to flavor the water, because stored water tastes a little icky – you can get tang, which has vitamin C, tea, coffee, or just go pick some mint to add to your water and hang it up to dry. Think again about what you need to feel good.

6. Do I have multivitamins at a minimum? What about other supplements that I might need? Our family keeps not only multivitamins for kids and adults, but also vitamins C, D and E. Do I have a reliable way of getting necessary medications? How about copies of your prescriptions and extra medication for emergencies?

7. What about basic hygeine items? Think soap, shampoo, toothpaste and tooth brushes, vinegar or some other cleaner, laundry detergent or borax, as well as toilet paper. You can substitute for some of these – you can use diluted Dr. Bronner’s soap for almost all these needs, baking soda in place of tooth paste, and use cloth for toilet paper if need be, but if these items will make you happier and more comfortable, store them. Make sure you have plenty of soap! Washing hands will be essential.

8. If my basics are covered, are there luxury items I’d like to add? Are there things my family needs or wants that would be useful? If the crisis overlaps holidays or festivals that are important to me, are there ways of storing items to allow us familiar treats or special foods?
Have I prepared for household pets and livestock? Do I have adequate food for them, or ways of making a nutritious diet for them out of my stored staples?

9. Do I have warm clothes, blankets, a way of heating myself, my home and/or food? Some way to cook the beans and grains? Do I have flashlights and batteries, a cell phone charger? How will I cook, bathe and do laundry without power? That is, am I ready for an emergency? My claim is not that we are facing an immanent one, but that we’ve already seen an increase in emergencies, and a slow down in our response to them – being able to take care of your own needs.
Am I prepared to deal with basic medical needs, or to handle an acute situation when I cannot reach a hospital or when they are overflowing? Do I have a book on first aid, or better yet, have I taken basic first aid, CPR and medical response classes? Do I have a good first aid kit? Does my household have a supply of basic OTC medications, and perhaps a broad-spectrum antibiotic (and the wisdom to use it only when truly necessary?) Do I know how to handle the range of basic injuries? Check out Chile’s first aid kit info: http://chilechews.blogspot.com/2008/10/building-first-aid-kit.html

10. Do I have mental health needs met? That is, can I handle the stress of a difficult period – a job loss, service loss or other crisis? Do I have ways to keep busy, to feel productive? Do we have games and educational materials to keep kids entertained and learning? Does my family have the habit of supporting each other through difficult times – do I have a strategy for dealing with stress productively? Do we have ways to have fun – music, games, sports equipment, books whatever our family likes to do? Can I not panic, and keep a sense of perspective.

Again, none of this should panic you. Answering “not yet” to some of these is not the end of the world. In fact, all of us, including me, probably have to say “not yet” at least somewhere. It should simply move you towards the next step, and the next.
.