Hawaii's Fake Statehood

SUBHEAD: We will be demonstrating simultaneously with Oahu and our other islands in a show of unity for Hawaii Independence. SOURCE: Nani Rogers (kealiagirl2004@yahoo.com) WHAT: Sign Holding and Demonstration against the State's Commemoration of Statehood.
image above: Sign near the Lihue Airport entry/exit.
From http://www.dotphoto.com/GuestViewImage.asp?AID=2649746&IID=86230702 WHEN AND WHERE:
Friday, August 21st
12:00 Noon: Airport Entrance Some of us will be at the airport passing out flyers while the rest of us will be holding signs and banners and chanting on the highway.
1:00: Move to Historic County Building on Rice Street. We will meet on the lawn for a picnic lunch.
1:30 to 3:30: Sign Holding at Historic County Building on Rice Street
4:00 pm: Airport Entrance
We return to the airport highway to hold signs from 4 till pau. WHY: Aloha kakou na Kanaka Maoli and Kanaka Maoli Allies, This is a call to action for your support! The Kauai Alliance for Peace and Justice and our allies invites you to please join us on August 21, 2009 for a sign-holding demonstration against the State's commemoration of Statehood. Why should anyone want to commemorate a lie? The State of Hawaii is a FAKE. We will be demonstrating simultaneously with Oahu and our other islands in a show of unity for Hawaii Independence and in strong protest against Hawaii's artificial Statehood. Please wear BLACK t-shirts and bring TI LEAVES to hold or wear.
BRING CAMERAS, MAKE SIGNS with any kind of message you want to say to the State whether is about the state employees jobs, the Alio Beach bike path, burial desecration by the State, just speak your mind!
Please bring your families, neighbors and friends. It will be a historical event and something our children can look back on and be proud of. Please respond with a quick note (to Nani Rogers, kealiagirl2004@yahoo.com) to let us know if you are able to join us anytime throughout the day.
Mahalo a me imua kakou! Please print and practice these chants:
I Ku Mau Mau
One person: I ku maumau!
Everyone: I ku wa!
One person: I ku maumau, I ku huluhul, I kalana wau!
Everyone: I ku wa!
One person: I ku lana wau!
Everyone: I ku wa!
Everyone: I ku wa huki, I ku wa kou, I ku wa`a mau, A mau ka iulu!
E huki e! Kulia!
E Ala E Ka Hiki E
Everyone:
E ala e Kahiki e!
E ala e Kahiki e!
E hume ka malo a ai ka ai
E hopu ka lima i ka hoe
A hoe a! (spoken)
CONTACT: Puanani Rogers Ho`okipa Network - Kauai Kapaa, Hi 96746 Polynesian Kingdom of Hawaii (808) 652-1249 Think KANAKA MAOLI......Think KU`OKO`A

Urban Farming Is the Future

SUBHEAD: Victory Gardens are for growing at least some basics food instead of the insanity of having your own personal golf course. image above: Urban farmer Will Allen won a Genius Award from the McArthur Foundation From http://solar1.org/2008/09/26/urban-farmer-wins-genius-award By David Tracey on 17 August 2009 in The Tyee http://thetyee.ca/News/2009/08/18/UrbanFarmingFuture

The first odd thing about Cam Macdonald's Mt. Pleasant lawn is that it isn't a lawn. It's a farm.

Standing out amid the typical suburban sea of grass patches are his potatoes, carrots, beats, peas, shallots, squash, parsnips and more -- enough to have given food to 70 people by the beginning of July.

The second odd thing is that it isn't even Cam's yard. It belongs to Heidi Gigler and Jug Sidhu, a non-gardening couple who heard about Cam's soul search for right livelihood last year and agreed to let him pursue it by turning their turf into food.

Does this small but significant act of land karma represent the beginning of a profound challenge to our very notions of private property and home ownership? Or is it just a simple way for a few more people to eat a little more food from where they live -- a driving force behind the soaring popularity of urban agriculture?

In any case, it's working. Cam is on his way to what could become a career, and the couple are thrilled with the look and taste of their front yard. "The problem," said Heidi, "is it's hard to keep up with the food."

They give some of the excess away to neighbours, including people they hardly knew before the creation of the front yard farm. "Now we're having constant conversations... It's really created a community."

Cam sees it as a first step. With his three partners, he hopes to hone his skills into a profitable business next year. Not bad for a guy who just got started in urban farming with little experience beyond "a year of reading a lot, talking to a lot of people who know what they're doing and just doing it."

It's only fair to mention that he did know a few things about indoor plants, having grown them during a self-apprenticeship in horticulture for which he now credits the Vancouver Police Department because it didn't arrest him. Of course growing food crops outdoors is different, but he swears it's not at all difficult. His advice: "Anyone can do it."

Many are, including some driven by a scary thought: we're running out of food.

Remember the global food crisis?

Until last fall when bankers took over the headlines, 2008 was known as "The Year of the Global Food Crisis."

Oddly, the crisis came at a time of world record grain harvests. Yet stockpiles went down and prices way up, to the breaking point.

Protesters marched in the streets of more than 20 countries. In the Philippines soldiers had to guard rice reserves. In Egypt the army was mobilized to bake bread.

Among the blamed was Big Ag, the corporations dominating industrial agriculture. Food giant Cargill saw its profits soar 86% during the worst of the crisis, while pesticide and seed seller Monsanto doubled its earnings, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Also pegged as part of the problem were commodity speculators, farmers planting bio-fuel rather than food crops, and swelling middle classes in China and India eating meat (animals need a lot of plants). Another probable cause was not always mentioned but may be the most ominous: peak oil.

Fossil fuels are used for the fertilizers and pesticides that power industrial agriculture. They're also burned to transport all those 2,400-mile salads. Our world food system was built on cheap oil, so if that era is about to end, it follows, so too is the way we eat, and live.

But hang on. It could get worse. And sooner than you think.

The mother of all monkey wrenches may be global climate change. Even in the near term, bigger storms and longer droughts will mean harder farming and fewer crops.

So with one crisis feeding another, which catastrophe will it be? Dwindling food stocks? Soaring energy costs? Global climate weirdness?

You could pick any one of them and worry yourself useless. Or you could do something about all three by growing a way out of the problem.

Can cities save agriculture?

It's called urban agriculture, and it's relatively new, at least on the scale now being tried. But it may be just what humanity needs if it's going to survive.

Too bold?

Let's break it down. Start with a simple question:

Can cities save agriculture?

Of course this would normally be asked the other way around. Rural farmers have fed urban residents since "agri" met "culture" 10,000 years ago.

It worked, and it didn't. Cities thrived, but not indefinitely. No society has ever been able to outlive its resources.

The limits, we realize now, as an urban species, with more than half our population in cities and a million more arriving every week, are planetary. Viewed through that lens, we can see a system being strained perhaps to the point of failure.

The worst effects are evident already in places like Botswana and Haiti. But not just there. In Canada more than 700,000 now visit food banks every month, including a rising number of families and those with jobs -- people confronting the new food realities for the first time.

If the old urban model based on exploiting surrounding resources won't work, the critical question of our time will be whether we can design livable cities without ruining the earth in the process. Or as educators in Queensland recently defined that clunky word "sustainability" for schoolchildren: we need to figure out how to provide "enough for everyone forever."

Ecology, energy, jobs, housing -- these and more will all figure in the ways we build a more sensible world, but the city of the future will largely be shaped by its food, something we're not used to considering in the big picture.

Food security, food systems, food sovereignty, food policy. If these terms aren't familiar yet, they may well be soon. Others will emerge as the movement grows. The model city of the 21st century may turn out to be a living, green, healthy place in harmony with its own "foodshed," unless that sounds too much like a pantry in the back yard.

BC could be a leading example

We know a population of billions will still need large rural farms. And we hope we can always share the benefits of fair trading on a small planet, because no amount of eco-guilt will ever convince some (me) that drinking tea in Canada is a terrible thing.

But we are heading into an era where many more people will have to reconnect significantly with their food in all its stages: growing, distributing, preparing, eating, recycling. Starting with growing.

Urban agriculture is spreading in B.C. and around the world. Rarely mentioned a generation ago, it's the buzz term of our day.

It already offers an estimated 800 million farmers a chance to shape their own urban environment, cut grocery budgets, eat fresh produce, reduce carbon emissions, beautify developed areas, re-engage with rural growers and, fingers crossed, maybe even save the planet.

Modern urban agriculture is still in the experimental stages. In some places it's hip, in others a way to survive. Just how it turns out, and what the term means 25 years from now, is still to be determined, perhaps with our help.

British Columbians can lead the world in offering an enlightened model of city living centred on healthy food for all.

Why us?

Our cities are still new, on the historical scale, so we're not bound by medieval property lines or centuries-old thinking.

We like to think of ourselves as innovative in urban design, and willing to try new ideas if they'll lead to a healthier environment.

We have good growing conditions: rich soil, clean water and weather mild enough, near the coast anyway, to support year-round harvests of fresh greens.

We've escaped the worst of the urban sprawl riddling other regions in North America, thanks to the farmland protection act known as the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR).

We'll back our growers where it counts, at the cash register, according to an Ipsos Reid poll that found eight out of 10 people willing to pay a premium for food that's fresh, local and grown with fewer chemicals and pesticides.

Finally, we're mad to grow it ourselves, to judge by the booming sales of vegetable seeds and long waiting lists for community garden plots.

Get dirty

Explanations for why so many more people are eager to grow their own food vary, but at least some of the interest stems from the urban angst brought on by all the predictions of a bleak environmental future.

So to put the answer to our simple question in simple terms: cities must save agriculture because nothing else can, and vice versa.

The appeal of doing something, with your hands in the soil, offers anyone a chance to be in on the solution. You could wallow in the end of the world as we know it, or you could take an active role as an engaged citizen while you bite into a sun-warmed tomato fresh off the vine. Which side are you on?

This series explores the boom in urban agriculture in British Columbia by looking at how we got here, how we rate comparatively and, most importantly, what we should be doing now to create a better food future.

Industrial Apocalypse

SUBHEAD: The collapse of civilization will bring us a saner world, says Paul Kingsnorth. No, counters George Monbiot – we can't let billions perish. image above: George Monbiot (l) and Paul Kingsnorth (r) From http://www.artcornwall.org/feature%20daro%20montag3.htm and http://www.portobellobooks.com/Authors/Paul-Kingsnorth?view=zoomPortrait By Monbiot & Kingsnorth on 17 August 2009 in The Guardian - (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cif-green/2009/aug/17/environment-climate-change)

From Paul Kingsnorth to George Monbiot

Dear George On the desk in front of me is a set of graphs. The horizontal axis of each represents the years 1750 to 2000. The graphs show, variously, population levels, CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, exploitation of fisheries, destruction of tropical forests, paper consumption, number of motor vehicles, water use, the rate of species extinction and the totality of the human economy's gross domestic product.

What grips me about these graphs (and graphs don't usually grip me) is that though they all show very different things, they have an almost identical shape. A line begins on the left of the page, rising gradually as it moves to the right. Then, in the last inch or so – around 1950 – it veers steeply upwards, like a pilot banking after a cliff has suddenly appeared from what he thought was an empty bank of cloud.

The root cause of all these trends is the same: a rapacious human economy bringing the world swiftly to the brink of chaos. We know this; some of us even attempt to stop it happening. Yet all of these trends continue to get rapidly worse, and there is no sign of that changing soon. What these graphs make clear better than anything else is the cold reality: there is a serious crash on the way.

Yet very few of us are prepared to look honestly at the message this reality is screaming at us: that the civilization we are a part of is hitting the buffers at full speed, and it is too late to stop it. Instead, most of us – and I include in this generalization much of the mainstream environmental movement – are still wedded to a vision of the future as an upgraded version of the present. We still believe in "progress", as lazily defined by western liberalism. We still believe that we will be able to continue living more or less the same comfortable lives (albeit with more windfarms and better lightbulbs) if we can only embrace "sustainable development" rapidly enough; and that we can then extend it to the extra 3 billion people who will shortly join us on this already gasping planet.

I think this is simply denial. The writing is on the wall for industrial society, and no amount of ethical shopping or determined protesting is going to change that now. Take a civilization built on the myth of human exceptionalism and a deeply embedded cultural attitude to "nature"; add a blind belief in technological and material progress; then fuel the whole thing with a power source that is discovered to be disastrously destructive only after we have used it to inflate our numbers and appetites beyond the point of no return. What do you get? We are starting to find out.

We need to get real. Climate change is teetering on the point of no return while our leaders bang the drum for more growth. The economic system we rely upon cannot be tamed without collapsing, for it relies upon that growth to function. And who wants it tamed anyway? Most people in the rich world won't be giving up their cars or holidays without a fight.

Some people – perhaps you – believe that these things should not be said, even if true, because saying them will deprive people of "hope", and without hope there will be no chance of "saving the planet". But false hope is worse than no hope at all. As for saving the planet – what we are really trying to save, as we scrabble around planting turbines on mountains and shouting at ministers, is not the planet but our attachment to the western material culture, which we cannot imagine living without.

The challenge is not how to shore up a crumbling empire with wave machines and global summits, but to start thinking about how we are going to live through its fall, and what we can learn from its collapse.

All the best, Paul

. . .

From George Monbiot to Paul Kingsnorth

Dear Paul Like you, I have become ever gloomier about our chances of avoiding the crash you predict. For the past few years I have been almost professionally optimistic, exhorting people to keep fighting, knowing that to say there is no hope is to make it so. I still have some faith in our ability to make rational decisions based on evidence. But it is waning.

If it has taken governments this long even to start discussing reform of the common fisheries policy – if they refuse even to make contingency plans for peak oil – what hope is there of working towards a steady-state economy, let alone the voluntary economic contraction ultimately required to avoid either the climate crash or the depletion of crucial resources?

The interesting question, and the one that probably divides us, is this: to what extent should we welcome the likely collapse of industrial civilization? Or more precisely: to what extent do we believe that some good may come of it?

I detect in your writings, and in the conversations we have had, an attraction towards – almost a yearning for – this apocalypse, a sense that you see it as a cleansing fire that will rid the world of a diseased society. If this is your view, I do not share it. I'm sure we can agree that the immediate consequences of collapse would be hideous: the breakdown of the systems that keep most of us alive; mass starvation; war. These alone surely give us sufficient reason to fight on, however faint our chances appear. But even if we were somehow able to put this out of our minds, I believe that what is likely to come out on the other side will be worse than our current settlement.

Here are three observations:

  1. Our species (unlike most of its members) is tough and resilient;
  2. When civilizations collapse, psychopaths take over;
  3. We seldom learn from others' mistakes.

From the first observation, this follows: even if you are hardened to the fate of humans, you can surely see that our species will not become extinct without causing the extinction of almost all others. However hard we fall, we will recover sufficiently to land another hammer blow on the biosphere. We will continue to do so until there is so little left that even Homo sapiens can no longer survive. This is the ecological destiny of a species possessed of outstanding intelligence, opposable thumbs and an ability to interpret and exploit almost every possible resource – in the absence of political restraint.

From the second and third observations, this follows: instead of gathering as free collectives of happy householders, survivors of this collapse will be subject to the will of people seeking to monopolize remaining resources. This will is likely to be imposed through violence. Political accountability will be a distant memory. The chances of conserving any resource in these circumstances are approximately zero. The human and ecological consequences of the first global collapse are likely to persist for many generations, perhaps for our species' remaining time on earth. To imagine that good could come of the involuntary failure of industrial civilization is also to succumb to denial. The answer to your question – what will we learn from this collapse? – is nothing.

This is why, despite everything, I fight on. I am not fighting to sustain economic growth. I am fighting to prevent both initial collapse and the repeated catastrophe that follows. However faint the hopes of engineering a soft landing – an ordered and structured downsizing of the global economy – might be, we must keep this possibility alive. Perhaps we are both in denial: I, because I think the fight is still worth having; you, because you think it isn't.

With my best wishes, George

. . .

From Paul Kingsnorth to George Monbiot

Dear George You say that you detect in my writing a yearning for apocalypse. I detect in yours a paralyzing fear.

You have convinced yourself that there are only two possible futures available to humanity. One we might call Liberal Capitalist Democracy 2.0. Clearly your preferred option, this is much like the world we live in now, only with fossil fuels replaced by solar panels; governments and corporations held to account by active citizens; and growth somehow cast aside in favor of a "steady state economy".

The other we might call McCarthy world, from Cormac McCarthy's novel The Road – which is set in an impossibly hideous post-apocalyptic world, where everything is dead but humans, who are reduced to eating children. Not long ago you suggested in a column that such a future could await us if we didn't continue "the fight".

Your letter continues mining this Hobbesian vein. We have to "fight on" because without modern industrial civilization the psychopaths will take over, and there will be "mass starvation and war". Leaving aside the fact that psychopaths seem to be running the show already, and millions are suffering today from starvation and war, I think this is a false choice. We both come from a western, Christian culture with a deep apocalyptic tradition. You seem to find it hard to see beyond it. But I am not "yearning" for some archetypal End of Days, because that's not what we face.

We face what John Michael Greer, in his book of the same name, calls a "long descent": a series of ongoing crises brought about by the factors I talked of in my first letter that will bring an end to the all-consuming culture we have imposed upon the Earth. I'm sure "some good will come" from this, for that culture is a weapon of planetary mass destruction.

Our civilization will not survive in anything like its present form, but we can at least aim for a managed retreat to a saner world. Your alternative – to hold on to nurse for fear of finding something worse – is in any case a century too late. When empires begin to fall, they build their own momentum. But what comes next doesn't have to be McCarthyworld. Fear is a poor guide to the future.

All the best, Paul

. . .

From George Monbiot to Paul Kingsnorth

Dear Paul If I have understood you correctly, you are proposing to do nothing to prevent the likely collapse of industrial civilization. You believe that instead of trying to replace fossil fuels with other energy sources, we should let the system slide. You go on to say that we should not fear this outcome.

How many people do you believe the world could support without either fossil fuels or an equivalent investment in alternative energy? How many would survive without modern industrial civilization? Two billion? One billion? Under your vision several billion perish. And you tell me we have nothing to fear.

I find it hard to understand how you could be unaffected by this prospect. I accused you of denial before; this looks more like disavowal. I hear a perverse echo in your writing of the philosophies that most offend you: your macho assertion that we have nothing to fear from collapse mirrors the macho assertion that we have nothing to fear from endless growth. Both positions betray a refusal to engage with physical reality.

Your disavowal is informed by a misunderstanding. You maintain that modern industrial civilization "is a weapon of planetary mass destruction". Anyone apprised of the palaeolithic massacre of the African and Eurasian megafauna, or the extermination of the great beasts of the Americas, or the massive carbon pulse produced by deforestation in the Neolithic must be able to see that the weapon of planetary mass destruction is not the current culture, but humankind.

You would purge the planet of industrial civilization, at the cost of billions of lives, only to discover that you have not invoked "a saner world" but just another phase of destruction.

Strange as it seems, a de-fanged, steady-state version of the current settlement might offer the best prospect humankind has ever had of avoiding collapse. For the first time in our history we are well-informed about the extent and causes of our ecological crises, know what should be done to avert them, and have the global means – if only the political will were present – of preventing them. Faced with your alternative – sit back and watch billions die – Liberal Democracy 2.0 looks like a pretty good option.

With my best wishes, George

. . .

From Paul Kingsnorth to George Monbiot

Dear George Macho, moi? You've been using the word "fight" at a Dick Cheney-like rate. Now my lack of fighting spirit sees me accused of complicity in mass death. This seems a fairly macho accusation.

Perhaps the heart of our disagreement can be found in a single sentence in your last letter: "You are proposing to do nothing to prevent the likely collapse of industrial civilization." This invites a question: what do you think I could do? What do you think you can do?

You've suggested several times that the hideous death of billions is the only alternative to a retooled status quo. Even if I accepted this loaded claim, which seems designed to make me look like a heartless fascist, it would get us nowhere because a retooled status quo is a fantasy and even you are close to admitting it. Rather than "do nothing" in response, I'd suggest we get some perspective on the root cause of this crisis – not human beings but the cultures within which they operate.

Civilizations live and die by their founding myths. Our myths tell us that humanity is separate from something called "nature", which is a "resource" for our use. They tell us there are no limits to human abilities, and that technology, science and our ineffable wisdom can fix everything. Above all, they tell us that we are in control. This craving for control underpins your approach. If we can just persuade the politicians to do A, B and C swiftly enough, then we will be saved. But what climate change shows us is that we are not in control, either of the biosphere or of the machine which is destroying it. Accepting that fact is our biggest challenge.

I think our task is to negotiate the coming descent as best we can, while creating new myths that put humanity in its proper place. Recently I co-founded a new initiative, the Dark Mountain Project, which aims to help do that. It won't save the world, but it might help us think about how to live through a hard century. You'd be welcome to join us.

Very best, Paul

. . .

From George Monbiot to Paul Kingsnorth

Dear Paul Yes, the words I use are fierce, but yours are strangely neutral. I note that you have failed to answer my question about how many people the world could support without modern forms of energy and the systems they sustain, but 2 billion is surely the optimistic extreme. You describe this mass cull as "a long descent" or a "retreat to a saner world". Have you ever considered a job in the Ministry of Defense press office?

I draw the trifling issue of a few billion fatalities to your attention not to make you look like a heartless fascist but because it's a reality with which you refuse to engage. You don't see it because to do so would be to accept the need for action. But of course you aren't doing nothing. You propose to stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood, and, er … "get some perspective on the root cause of this crisis". Fine: we could all do with some perspective. But without action – informed, focused and immediate – the crisis will happen. I agree that the chances of success are small. But they are non-existent if we give up before we have started. You mock this impulse as a "craving for control". I see it as an attempt at survival.

What could you do? You know the answer as well as I do. Join up, protest, propose, create. It's messy, endless and uncertain of success. Perhaps you see yourself as above this futility, but it's all we've got and all we've ever had. And sometimes it works.

The curious outcome of this debate is that while I began as the optimist and you the pessimist, our roles have reversed. You appear to believe that though it is impossible to tame the global economy, it is possible to change our founding myths, some of which predate industrial civilisation by several thousand years. You also believe that good can come of a collapse that deprives most of the population of its means of survival. This strikes me as something more than optimism: a millenarian fantasy, perhaps, of Redemption after the Fall. Perhaps it is the perfect foil to my apocalyptic vision.

With my best wishes, George

Randy Hee & Reliability

SUBHEAD: KIUC's trend is towards 'reliability’. Renewable energy sources still on the back burner.
Image above: Computer graphic titled "Power Substation" by Christopher M. Park,

[Editor's note: The article below demonstrates the bankrupt thinking of Randall Hee and those running KIUC. He talks about lower rates now but that they will be trending up in the future. He talks of a need to trend towards more "reliability". Let's get one thing straight. The term "more reliability" is a code for "more centralized power plants and forgetting about distributed power generation from alternative sources" (solar, wind and hydro). "Reliability" means having more grid power generating capability than you need on average. KIUC is going exactly the wrong direction planning on its $75 million Gen X plant as part of its overall plan. We should have let Kauai Electric go belly up and not be saddled with $200 million in debt and be saddled with a retro thinking KIUC board. It' may be time to bail out of KIUC and get a Kauai Alternative Power Credit Union (KAPCU) going in its place. Then we can target alternative energy with a goal of flexibility and distributed generation.]

WHAT:
KIUC PUC Hearing on Rate Increase

WHEN:
25 August 2009

WHERE:
Wilcox Elementary School in Lihue

WHY:
Because it's your power company
By Leo Azambuja on 18 August 2009 in The Garden Island -
Hungry for a tasty bowl of chili and rice, some Caesar salad, Kauai-made cookies, and more importantly, news from the local electric cooperative, well over 300 people crowded the Kaua‘i War Memorial Convention Hall, Sunday evening.
The Kauai Island Utility Cooperative Annual Membership Meeting was to update its members of the co-op’s goals and achievements, and there was hardly a dull moment.
KIUC President and CEO Randal Hee reminded the crowd that the co-op is celebrating six full years of existence.
“We really have gone a long way,” he said.
The number of OSHA recordable accidents is down to only two so far this year, as opposed to 10 in 2008, according to Hee. The number of lost workdays this year is only three (one case), while in 2008 KIUC had 27 lost workdays (five cases).
Hee said in 2007, the average outage-hours per customer was 3.5 hours. By 2008, KIUC was able to keep that number at 1.5 hours, and in 2009 so far the number is at .75 hours.
“The trend is towards reliability,” Hee said. “Your lights will go out less. ... We were 99.99 percent reliable in 2008, and that’s a credit to our system improvements.”
KIUC customers might have been wondering why their electric bills have dropped this year. Hee said that in August 2008 the fuel was at its highest cost ever, resulting in KIUC’s highest rates ever.
“We dropped down (our prices) as a result of market changes and economic slump,” Hee said.
However, the prices could rise again.
“It’s trending back up,” Hee said, adding that at this time it appears to be market speculation.
Hee told KIUC members that one of the co-op’s key components is to become more energy efficient. KIUC is working together with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to figure out how much the co-op can reduce usage on Kauai.
The co-op’s long-term strategic plan says that by 2023, 50 percent of its electricity has to come from renewable sources, without burning fuel fossils.
“We have also been looking at solar energy,” Hee said.
KIUC is using a government stimulus to install a two-megawatt storage battery, which will allow the co-op to study how to store photovoltaic power, Hee said. The sun’s rays can provide thermal and photovoltaic energy.
Hee also discussed biomass derived from agricultural waste, hydroelectric power and wind farms.
“Wind is still a source we’re studying,” Hee said, adding that it is difficult to pursue wind energy at this time because studies in seabird flying paths still need to done.
KIUC gets power from two hydroelectric plants and is studying additional sites.
KIUC Chief Financial Officer David Bissel reminded the audience the co-op is seeking a 10.5 percent rate increase, the first one since 1996.
The Public Utilities Commission already approved KIUC’s rate increase application. Now it’s up to the public to give its input. The community is invited to a public hearing at 6 p.m., Aug. 25, at Wilcox Elementary School cafeteria.
KIUC Board Secretary David Iha said that in the first three months this year the co-op operated in the red. It was the first time in KIUC history that the expenses exceeded the revenue. But Iha said KIUC has turned it around and has been able to net some profit.
New board member Steve Rapozo said there is now a $200 application fee for new accounts. That fee will be refunded after a year of service, with eight percent interest, as long as the account is kept up to par.
Rapozo said KIUC should have all profit-sharing checks mailed by Wednesday. If a member hasn’t received a check a short while after that date, KIUC should be contacted.
The USDA, through the KIUC, has an interest-free loan program benefiting rural communities. Rapozo said Kauai Hospice, Hale Opio, the National Tropical Botanical Gardens and a few schools already benefited from this program, and KIUC has currently over $400,000 available. After the loan is paid back, the money is re-used in new loans.
There’s light at the end of the tunnel for the needy. Allan Smith, the co-op’s treasurer, said KIUC Charitable Foundation Board currently helps 700 low-income families to pay their electric bills.
After almost two hours of music, food, recognitions and numbers, KIUC saved the best for the last.
Every year hundreds of high-school students across the nation are hand-picked by local electric cooperatives for their excellence to participate in a week-long tour in Washington, D.C. The event is called “Government in Action” Youth Tour.
KIUC sends four students each year. From June 11-18, Natasha Abadilla, from Waimea High School; Dustin Julian, from Kaua‘i High school; Lacey Kalahiki, from Kamehameha School; and Alyssa Clark, from Kapa‘a High School, teamed up with 32 high-school students from Kansas to attend the event.
The four Hawai‘i students, together with the Kansas students, spent a couple days in Kansas, touring the local electric co-op, the Kansas State Capitol, learning about local history, and attending a Kansas City Royals ball game. Then they headed to D.C.
Abadilla and Julian were at the meeting, and showed a short video of the trip.
“It was the highlight of my year,” Abadilla said with a smile from ear to ear, adding that she learned a lot in the short time she spent touring the nation’s capital.
Julian was equally ecstatic. “It is unbelievable what we can learn in only a couple of weeks.”
In Washington, D.C. the students met with Sen. Daniel Akaka of Hawai‘i, visited the Capitol, the Smithsonian Museum, the Marine Corps Monument, the Korean War Veterans Memorial, the FDR Memorial, the Pentagon Memorial, and the Arlington National Cemetery.
KIUC Board Chair Teofilo “Phil” Tacbian said one of the most important things KIUC does is work with lawmakers and government officials.
“We have been very lucky that all of the people that we work with in the government have been very kind to us,” he said.
The crowd gave a thunderous ovation to newly elected County Councilman Derek Kawakami, a former KIUC director, and Councilwoman Lani Kawahara, who were present at the meeting.
Tacbian introduced new board members Stewart Burley, Benjamin Sullivan and Steve Rapozo.
KIUC had promised to distribute free bags of rice to the first 200 members, but its staff ended up giving away nearly 300 bags.
The Sunshine Express, Kalaheo School’s choir, opened the meeting with a delightful musical performance, giving a community get-together flair to the event. Residents, kupuna and keiki chatted and played, adding to the evening’s mood.
After it was all said and done, Tacbian adjourned the meeting, asking for aloha from the audience.

See also:

Hanapepe Journey - Part Two

SUBHEAD: The business of the future in Hanapepe will service local people with local products. By Juan Wilson on 18 August 2009 - Besides being a transportation and industrial center, historically Hanapepe town had unique role. It was not however a plantation town like so Koloa and Kekaha and many others. Hanapepe was a place that provided relief and entertainment from the grind of plantation work. It was famous for dance halls, restaurants, movie theaters, whore houses, bars, pool halls and opium dens. Today the town provides succor to tourists instead of soldiers and field workers. These days Friday's in "Old Hanapepe Town" provides a vibrant nightlife that supports many art galleries, craft stores, and street vendors. Usually the center of town hosts several musicians and entertainers. All of this is today largely dependent on tourists and will soon be greatly changed. I am not including those business and operations in my vision of businesses of the future. image above: Sign at east end of "Old Hanapepe Town". All photos by Juan Wilson. As mentioned many times in these pages, we believe there will be a new economic order when: 1) Flying by jet as an affordable recreational activity won't be viable anymore. 2) Fuel prices rise to a point where traditional US growth is turned to contraction. 3) Business costs will exclude Hawaii from full participation US economics.
4) Hawaii is forced into regional generation of food and energy. In "Hanapepe Journey - Part One" we named a few businesses in town that were already living in the "future". This did not mean that other businesses were not now healthy, viable operations. This article does not look into Eleele and Port Allen business activities, and will concentrate on the old part of town along the river, down in the flats. There are a number of businesses in Hanapepe that serve local residents on Friday as well as other days of the week. Some of these are related to the "bad old" economy. Those include auto parts, service and fuel operations that may continue on to for some time but will tend to fade away as the auto age ebbs away. Other traditional businesses offer food; make, sell or mend clothing; provide medical or dental services; or do the other small town functions that are needed will continue to be viable long into the future. But they are not the models for new types of operations either. This new economic order is already making its way into our daily lives in Hanapepe. I can tell because of something I saw in Chihuahua, Mexico in 1968. That was the first time I'd been in a "Third World" city and I experienced something then that I sense again now. It's going into a place of business and not knowing what was going on. You'd pass through an open door and could not tell if the place was a grocery, barber shop or private home. You could not tell if the place was open or what service they provided. You could not tell if things were for sale or not intended for your use. I had this experience again in Isfahan, Iran in 1976. "You know something is happening, but you don't know what it is! Do you, Mr. Jones?" - Bob Dylan Topping the list of businesses that are inventing themselves and leaning to the future are the Mana Ohana Food Co-op and the Habitat for Humanity Restore. Mana Ohana Mana Ohana is on the Kaumualii Highway just east of the Hanapepe River. It occupies what once was the biggest tourist trap in town, The Green Garden Restaurant. This sprawling place is alive again with retail space, dining and kitchen facilities. This co-operative health food supplier offers a vital service. They are an outlet for locals who grow and prepare natural foods. Mana Ohana allows suppliers to take credits to purchase store items... no cash required. Bring in what you have in plenty and trade it for what you don't have. The goals of Mana Ohana are to expand and have a "food court" dining/meeting and commercial kitchen facilities available for those that need them.(www.manaohana.net) - New Economy Element: Providing locally produced food. The Habitat Restore The Habitat for Humanities Restore Thrift Store is on the Kaumualii Highway in the pre-Iniki Am-Fac warehouse near the road down to Salt Pond. The Restore a kind of thrift store. It takes in what is offered in charity... but it is not just for retro tape cassettes, furniture and clothing. Like the Salvation Army Thrift Store, they have appliances, electronics, kitchenware, and baby products. Unlike a regular thrift store the Restore has building building materials and hardware. The stuff ranges from new and unused to bent-up and serviceable. A friend of mine built his house with what he found at the Restore just west of the river and mauka of the highway. (www.kauaihabitat.org) New Economy Element: Providing reuse of industrial materials. Storybook Theatre The Storybook Theatre of Hawaii (SBT) is a non-profit corporation dedicated to serving children's media. It produces the "Russell the Rooster TV show. It has a classroom, theater, sound and video studio, workshop, and a children's garden dedicated to peace. To date much of the support for SBT has been through grants but it is scrambling to support itself. SBT has opened a retail store on the first floor that sells a bit of everything including banana bread, SBT CD's and DVD's. SBT offers everything from ukulele lessons to studio time and sound recording. The potential is for Storybook Theatre to become a new kind of community center that focuses on childhood development, education, local culture and media distribution. (www.storybook.org) - New Economy Element: Local culture, education and entertainment. Talk Story Bookstore The name is often confused with Storybook Theatre (just across the street) but is a totally separate operation. The people at Talk Story Books sell new and used books online and in their spacious Hanapepe storefront. Besides specialty items they focus on the work of local authors and musicians. On Friday nights they offer free live music on their porch and on the first Monday of every month host a neighborhood potluck. It's a good place to duck into on a rainy afternoon for a game of chess. (www.talkstorybookstore.com) - New Economy Element: A link to civilization past and present. The Taro Ko Chip Factory This factory and retail store was until a few years ago operated by a woman in her late eighties, who when she was younger, used to work the Hanapepe Valley taro fields with her husband. Her son now operates the business. He makes packaged snack chips with local taro and sweet potato. From outside the place looks like an old plantation workers home. It took me a while to realize the Chip Factory was open to street traffic. Outside the front door there are often a few squash available for sale. - New Economy Element: Processing local agriculture crops into packaged food. J.J. Ohana's This store started out selling fine Niihau shell necklaces and imported gewgaws to tourists. They are now doing a bit of everything. They are still offer custom made Niihau shell products, but stopped relying on imported tourist claptrap. They are now open all the time with fresh brewed coffee, inexpensive lunches, and what they find works. - New Economy Element: Locally made crafts and food for locals. Besides new paradigms there is the tried and true. Attending to our addictions. That is what convenience stores do. They sell sweets, salt, fat, sugar, alcohol and tobacco. The latter two items are critical. We have two convenience stores. One at each end of town. Salt Pond Country Store At the west end of town opposite the Restore, Salt Pond County Store serves anyone in need that is going to the beach or further west. They used to have late hours but have dialed back. As a convenience store it has it all. Besides the Hana Rum and Maui Chips they specialize in some local foods like bento lunches, spam mitsubi, garlic potato salad, and pupus. But the thing that puts them on this list is the fishing and reef gear. If you're going to go catch your lunch in the ocean this store devotes a third of the store to rods, reels, nets, boots and other fishing equipment. - New Economy Element: Supplies equipment for gathering seafood. Aloha Spirits At the east end of town on Hanapepe Road, this store is open from morning to late night every day of the year. Day in and day out Aloha Spirits is the busiest place in Hanapepe. It serves mostly Hawaiians and other varieties of local residents. The place depends on tobacco and liquor sales but they service every other legal vices besides a sweet tooth. Condums, rolling papers, bagged ice, and even some local produce are in the mix. - New Economy Element: Nothing really new... just eternally ready to scratch that itch when you need it. see also: Ea O Ka Aina: Hanapepe Journey - Part One 8/6/09

Collective Ignorance

SUBHEAD: Unsustainable debt is the reason we are in this crisis, and it will not end until this debt is either paid off or defaulted. By John Schettler on 16 August 2009 in The Writing Shop http://www.writingshop.ws/html/collective_ignorance.html

I’ve been following the collective ignorance of both the mainstream media and the “analysts” and “economists” it relies upon in a number of blog posts the last few weeks. Today we learned that 90% of economists surveyed have said that the recession will definitively end in this third quarter. They point to the 6.7% GDP loss in the first quarter shrinking to a scant 1% loss, yet omit from their analysis that the bulk of the spending that drove the statistic was made by government bailouts and spending giveaways like “cash for clunkers.” Without that what would the real economy have logged—a staggering 8.9% decline in GDP last quarter!
image above: Green shoots, or is it supposed to be mustard seeds. The metaphor for economic recovery.
It was almost comical to note the progression of delusional thinking that first started with the germination of the “green shoots” metaphor into the public discourse. All the talking heads wanted to see signs of a recovery. There were no such signs that any thinking person could point to with any sense of intellectual integrity, and so the signs of a slowing decline were embraced instead as a sure indicator of imminent “recovery.” It’s a little like saying things are better because the 2nd tower took longer to fall on 9/11. Then, all the metrics that once measured bank solvency were conveniently changed or discarded. Shake and stir: you get phony “profits.”
First and foremost in the green shoot department is the manipulated bear market rally. Both the Dow and S&P 500 have been creeping up and holding on to gains. When reality threatened the ticker, little manipulated rallies and after hours futures buys were staged to herd the traders back to the buy side. Accounting rules governing how banks can value the billions in bad securities they hold, both on and off their balance sheets, were simply suspended. Mark to market became mark to whatever I damn well please, thank you very much. This allowed insolvent institutions deemed “too big to fail” to pretend that they were earning profits instead of sustaining losses. It was simple delusion and collective self-denial by means of statistical manipulation.

As in Orwell’s 1984, the headlines that were spawned from this numerical hanky panky were all rosy, a contrived official “truth” that was editable from moment to moment as the direction of the stock ticker required. It was meant to foment the trumped up stock rallies we seen sucking in the last of the sucker money out there in investor land. Restrictions were also placed on when and how you could short endangered corporate stocks, putting brakes on any downward movement in the ticker.
Earlier, as the crisis unfolded months ago, the “flight to safety saw billions flow into government treasury certificates. Yet as government deficits and total debt continued to pile up there was an implicit understanding by the real money out there that this debt was truly unsustainable—perhaps even unserviceable. Geithner asked Congress to raise the debt ceiling, already at $12.1 trillion, an amount that is nearly the equivalent of our entire annual GDP. “It is critically important that Congress act before the limit is reached so that citizens and investors here and around the world can remain confident that the United States will always meet its obligations.”

Consider what he was really saying. Please let us go even deeper into unsustainable debt, because we cannot balance our budget or meet our obligations now without more massive borrowing—nor can we do either after more massive borrowing. All we will end up with is more and more debt. No wonder he was practically laughed off the stage by Chinese university students when he tried to assert that China’s investments in the US were safe. Yes, as safe as a “security,” one of the great misnomers of the last few decades.
Suddenly T-bill auctions saw fewer and fewer buyers. The Chinese started grumbling and cutting back. The Japanese tried to smuggle billions in bond certificates into a Swiss bank. Money came back to the stock market, led by Goldman Sachs’ clever little front running trading algorithms until a disgruntled employee absconded with the code. Goldman had been in the #1 spot for daily trading volume for years. Suddenly they did not even make the top 15. But not to worry, the NASDAQ decided to simply stop reporting this data to cover the gaff, which shows you where the real power is in this country. When statistics ever reveal anything that might uncover some truth about the way our world actually works, again, as in Orwell’s world, they are simply “discontinued.”

Elizabeth Warren of the Business Insider chimed in with this assessment: “The banks are still insolvent. That little tweak to mark-to-market accounting a couple of months ago has allowed us all to plunge into deep denial. Now that the banks are allowed to lie about what their toxic assets are worth, they'll never sell them (because if they did they would have to write them down). The smaller banks are undercapitalized and will have to raise another $12-$14 billion.”

So this is the sort of duplicity and conniving that has propped up the banks and stock markets. If that were not bad enough, the fact that these markets are completely disconnected from the reality on Main Street makes any perception of recovery that is based on the market ticker nothing more than ignorance. You ignore the record foreclosures rate set in July, ignore the continuing plunge in home values, $10 trillion in evaporating equity, ignore the failing businesses, falling retail sales, lost jobs, even as the government itself ignores the 5 million workers who are deemed “discouraged” and who simply gave up on trying to find a job.
Instead of truthfully reporting them as unemployed, the statisticians simply exclude them from the work force, shrinking the pool of workers so the percentages they report will look like a recovery is nigh at hand. This is wishful thinking at best, downright lies if we look at this with any intellectual honesty.
Here’s some of the fallacious number manipulation that has produced contrived “good news” to spin the green shoots and recovery meme on the news. Consider unemployment, as I commented in “Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics:”
1) Have you been out of a job for longer than one year?
2) Have you recently seen your unemployment benefits run out, but still find no work?
3) Are you out of work but so discouraged you haven't looked for a job in the last 4 weeks?
4) Have you lost your full time job and are you working part time to scrape by?
5) Are you in a trade or profession that has seasonal or chronic unemployment?
GOOD NEWS FROM THE GOVERNMENT!!! You're NOT unemployed!
Yes, you read that correctly. If any of the above conditions applies to you, according to the government you are NOT unemployed! Forget about the fact that you also do NOT receive a paycheck each week. That's a minor detail to the statisticians who compile the rosy employment data at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. When Uncle Sam counts heads for all folks he reports as unemployed in the official U-3 number, none of the categories above are tallied.
Let's sharpen a pencil and add things up...
1) About 5,000,000 have been out of work over a year--but they are no longer counted.
2) About 71,500,000 saw their benefits run out in the last 60 days--out of work, but not counted.
3) About 1,400,000 didn't look for a job in the last month--out of work, but not counted.
4) About 9,000,000 can't find a full time job at all--not counted as unemployed.
5) Tens of thousands of seasonal workers have no current work--but they are not counted.
Add to this the fact that tens of thousands of former small business owners, who could not claim unemployment insurance when their business failed, are also not counted. And all those workers at state offices closed to save money, and all those workers sent home without pay for a week in companies all across the nation... not even in the Fed spreadsheet. Not counted. Then consider that the government just did a "statistical sample" and added 185,000 new people to be counted as "employed" last month, even though no data exists to prove any of these people were real, or that they actually landed a job. It was just a math formula.
Don't you just love the way the government crunches numbers? This is the same sort of basic intellectual denial that sees all sorts of "green shoots" sprouting up when in fact there is no sign of any economic recovery underway now at all. Zero, zilch, none. So after heavily fudging its numbers the Federal government reports only 9.5% unemployed (BLS Number for June '09) when in actuality the real number is about double that. Then by discounting all the distressed workers listed above the Government shrinks the work force and says the jobless rate lowered to 9.4% in July, even though another quarter million jobs were lost that month. The government numbers are flat out wrong, and any “economist” that relies on them is being foolish.
In reality one in five American workers are out of work, or underemployed, about 20% of the workforce now. Spin that any way you want, but it is near depression level unemployment, and it arrived 24 months sooner than it did in the 1930s.
Charles Hugh Smith took his sharp pen to the current stock market rally and noted ten reasons why the so called imminent recovery is a house built on quicksand.
1. Structural unemployment (real unemployment) is skyrocketing.
2. The jobless rate declined because the work force shrank.
3. Everyone seems to have forgotten we need to create 250,000 jobs a month just to stay even with population growth.
4. The interest on all the debt the nation is taking on to bail out bankers and "stimulate" the dead credit-bubble model will place a drag on growth far into the future.
5. Interest rates are set to double.
6. Tax revenues are tanking.
7. Normal accounting and reporting rules have been suspended.
8. Commercial Real Estate is spiraling round the drain.
9. Consumers are retrenching generationally, not for a few months.
10. Residential housing is not healed; it's still bleeding profusely.
So, you can believe MSNBC’s talk of an ever rising DOW leading us all up the yellow brick road to recovery, or you can understand that manipulated stock plays and fabricated statistics do not reflect in any way the real condition of the economy. Take your pick.
Real Pain
Let’s take real estate for a moment, where the crisis first emerged. Everyone has been looking at housing starts, new home sales, and seeing a tiny uptick that they quickly spin into recovery. What they omit from the analysis is that new home sales make up only a third of the market, which is largely dominated by existing home sales. And of these what they also omit from their dullard minds is the enormous numbers of foreclosures and bank auctioned short sales that now makes up the existing home sale number.
In effect, that number is a measure of pain, not recovery. People are losing their homes and banks are dumping them for whatever they can get. People are selling their homes for big losses, and moving on. We aren’t looking at typical healthy mortgages in any sense of what used to be defined as a normal market. The lion’s share of all housing sales is now just a measure of pain.
On the commercial side, a huge wave of potential defaults now threatens—so much so that it even got the attention of Ben Bernanke. According to Bloomberg, Bernanke admitted that:
"A potential wave of defaults in commercial real estate may present a 'difficult' challenge for the economy."
Note to Ben, it's not a 'potential' wave, it's a 100 foot monster cresting just off shore and ready to roll in on the banking and financial system with a vengeance.
Elizabeth MacDonald of Emacs Stock Watch put it all in honest numbers: “About $1.4 trillion of commercial real estate mortgage loans will be maturing within the next five years, and as much as $750 billion will be maturing in less than three years, says Steven Sandler, chief executive officer of the private equity firm Crosswind Capital in Rye, NY. An estimated $165 billion to $204 billion in U.S. commercial real estate loans could be maturing this year alone, analysts estimate. All of these loans will likely need to be refinanced in an already jammed-tight lending market.” Again the Fed is desperately trying to build a levee before the wave hits. It has announced it will accept commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) as collateral for Fed loans through TALF, a program to stimulate the purchase of securities on these loans where the government (taxpayer) puts up the lion’s share of the money and takes the lion’s share of the risk—while the “investor” gets free money and virtually no risk. As if they have learned nothing, the intent is to get the old securities game restarted at all costs, and the cost this time could be enormous.
MacDonald reported that Standard & Poors had downgraded a raft of bonds based on these commercial mortgages from AAA to near junk, (perhaps in an effort to correct their ratings fraud and return to reality). But, oops, a few weeks later, with the Fed ramping up TALF, the bonds were quietly restored to their AAA rating so they could qualify for that program. Sounds like someone paid a visit to S&P and did a little arm twisting. Someone tries to reflect reality and calls a proverbial spade a spade—someone else steps in and restores the illusion. The game must go on, but I predict that TALF will be unable to stave off the wave of commercial defaults beginning to surge ashore.
The first wave, sub-prime housing loan defaults, was only the initial storm surge before the hurricane of real estate distress out there. Yet it was able to knock down Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch, run Morgan Stanley to high ground, flood out WaMu and Wachovia, all but topple AIG, and inundate Fannie Mae and Freddi Mac under twenty feet of malarial toxic waste water. If that wasn't bad enough, it so stressed the housing market that millions of "homeowners" saw their house values decline to a point where they were also "underwater," unable to sell without taking a loss.
Financial Times reported this month: "Two of America’s biggest banks, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo, on Wednesday threw into sharp relief the mounting woes of the US commercial property market when they reported large losses and surging bad loans...Wells Fargo saw non-performing loans in commercial real estate jump 69 per cent, from $4.5bn to $7.6bn in the second quarter as the economic downturn caused developers and office owners to fall behind in their mortgage payments." Bernanke noted that the market for commercial mortgage backed securities had “completely shut down,” meaning banks have no way to pass the risk of default off to some other dupe in the system. This means that as all the commercial loans mature and need refinancing, the bankers won't be so friendly. It also means that we will see more and more commercial defaults, more empty office towers, strip malls, and vacant apartment complexes. It's the worse possible time to be a commercial real estate developer/investor.
All of this, the sub-prime, ALT-A, Option ARM and interest only loans, the no-doc, low-doc, liar loans that were written and approved, all of it was the creation and cash cow of the banking system. The crisis we have now with all these loan resets triggering defaults and bank foreclosures is entirely "Made in America" by the US banks. The notion of modifying the loans so payments get lower as the house sheds value never seems to occur to the banks. They can't imagine any solution that doesn't fatten their bottom line.
James Kunstler commented: "A broad consensus has formed in the news media and among government mouthpieces and even some "bearish" investors on the street that "the worst is behind us" in this tortured economy. This view is completely crazy." In a subsequent post he went on to characterize the happy glow that we have created with this “fog of numbers.” … “Now that Newsweek Magazine -- along with the mendacious cretins at CNBC -- have declared the "recession" officially over, it's a sure thing that we are entering the zone of greatest danger. Some foul odor rides the late summer wind, as of a rough beast slouching toward the US Treasury. The stock markets have gathered in the critical mass of suckers needed to flush all remaining hope out of the system. The foreign holders of US promissory notes are sharpening their long knives in the humid darkness. The suburban householders are watching sharks swim in their driveways. The REIT executives are getting ready to gargle with Gillette blue blades. The Goldman Sachs bonus babies are trying to imagine the good life in Paraguay or the archipelago of Tristan da Cunha.”
Of course not everyone believes the media assertion that a recovery is nigh at hand. The Washington Times reported on what some of the “real money” believes out there. “Two major entrepreneurial tycoons, in the multibillion-dollar league, with worldwide interests, speaking not for attribution, agree that the worst is yet to come. America has to reinvent itself for the 21st century, but this won't happen before another big credit-rattling shock. Millions of jobs are not coming back, they said. They were speaking about the current global financial and economic crisis. Another humongous credit crunch is on the way, they believe, and the current optimism is simply a pause before another major downward slide. Unemployment, they forecast, will climb from the low to the high teens. A pledge to limit tax increases to those making more than $250,000 a year is a pipe dream. Someone has to pay the health piper. Major social dislocations are on their horizon for 2010. One of the interlocutors has shunned all manner of stocks in favor of discounted corporate bonds that yield 7 1/2 percent, and gold. The other has already moved all his financial holdings into a cocktail of Asian currencies based at a new entity he created in Singapore.” There you have it. The men with the real bucks at risk have little or no faith in the “recovery.” They are buying gold and interest in a basket of Asian currencies.
What is it that keeps the broad consensus so enamored of these ephemeral green shoots? Perhaps we so long to return to the good old days of shopping on credit, that we will believe any good news whispered our way by the media. Yet reality tests every opinion in time. We are still in the denial stage of our grief over the diminishing prospects for our collective future. The anger is yet to come, and it will be very uncomfortable politically when it finally does come--when people realize things haven't really changed at all, in spite of what MSNBC, CNN and Fox News think.
Why There Is No Recovery In Sight
For any real recovery we will need three things:
1) a healthy consumer base with disposable income,
2) a healthy business sector that is producing, not losing, jobs,
3) a healthy real estate sector that is appreciating in value and creating equity, not depreciating and losing equity as it is now.
Can anyone in their right mind assert that we’re about to see a surge in consumer spending, job creation, and real estate? Of course not. All they can assert is that the decline in those areas has slowed from its freefall, which is only to be expected in any downturn. The crisis still has many evolutions to work through, the greatest of which is the massive debt at every level of our society, from federal and state governments, to cities, the banks, corporations, households and individuals. Debt is the reason we are in this crisis, and it will not end until this debt is either paid off or defaulted. Sadly, the solutions taken so far have all been based on accumulating more and more debt.
Consumers have finally “felt the pinch” the banks have put on them for years. The game of ever expanding credit is over. 8 million credit cards were terminated in the last year, and millions more in credit lines were cancelled. Consumers have started saving, and for the first time in history, consumer credit contracted year over year.
Mike Whitney summed this situation up nicely: “When credit contracts in a consumer-driven economy, bad things happen. Business investment drops, unemployment soars, earnings plunge, and GDP shrinks. The Fed has spent more than a trillion dollars trying to get consumers to start borrowing again, but without success. The country's credit engines are grinding to a halt.” This situation of massive consumer debt in contraction, along with continued job loss, tells any thinking person that there will not be a resurgence in consumer spending—and if one comes it will be as short lived as the actual funds saved thus far in the crisis. Then it will be back to the reality of cash and carry. As Charles Hugh Smith asserts, this could also be a generational shift in consumer spending patterns. So say good-bye to nothing down and low, easy payments—and all the retail sales that mantra drove in days of yore. Notice how bank financing and credit falls as unemployment rises. Recovery?

I’ve said enough on #2, the shrinking job market. It is likely to remain soft for many years, perhaps a decade according to some observers. Slow sales do not auger for lots of new hiring, and most of the healthy job sectors like health care and education are now saturated. They cannot be counted on to continue producing new jobs. So continuing job loss and long term unemployment will mean shrinking incomes and simply reinforce the dire situation we already have with the failing consumer. Also, the millions falling off the unemployment benefit rolls into the limbo of the invisible unemployed will remain missing in action in the shopping malls. Instead they will begin to populate the streets and alleys of former middle class neighborhoods—a new class of pan handlers, tent campers and homeless people, with the smudge of the depression staining their white collars, and no prospects for a job that might restore their former white collar middle class life style.
As for #3, housing, the 90 day delinquency rate was well under 1% in January of 2007. It is now approaching 7%, and has increased every month since. Foreclosure rates now continue to climb after the brief moratoriums imposed by government have expired. Short sales have driven the existing home sale market. In short—no recovery in sight and a nightmare in commercial real estate ready to open the second act of this play.
The Next Crisis
Everyone is wondering what the finale will be—and when we can expect it. I recently wrote about all the terrible things forecasted by the blogosphere that are just about to happen but never seem to get here—like the asteroid or earthquake that is always threatening. I think this is just a trick of our own wishful thinking. The damage already done has effectively destroyed the banking system. It is a mirage. It is not functioning as it should, and is only operating at all because the banks and government have colluded and agreed that all the normal rules of accounting for losses and holding reserves will be set aside so we can pretend the system is still solvent. It was an expedient “gentlemen’s agreement” that has created the illusion that the worst has been averted—when in fact the damage is already done.
We just refuse to admit what has happened. This is like a person looking at the ruin of their hurricane devastated home and claiming that everything is still really there, just in a different arrangement. So banks claiming that they will hold all their toxic assets to maturity when they will miraculously be worth what they were on the date of issuance is a bit like that same former homeowner claiming all they have to do is rearrange the shattered fragments of their home to restore it to its former condition. The problem is that most of the house has been blown into the next county, and the same can be said for the solvency of banks holding countless trillions in mortgage backed securities and derivatives.
Unfortunately, this recession is far from over. In fact it is about to transition definitively from “Great Recession” to “Great Depression” as the people living on Main Street realize that their lives are going from bad to worse, in spite of TARP and TALF and all the other bailouts. Good news! Bankrupt Chrysler is going to roll out the new Volt electric car claiming 230 miles per gallon. Bad news—it will cost $40,000, and only the wealthy will be able to buy it. No one else will get financing. This is the sad state of diminishing returns for Average Joe.
The rising commercial real estate defaults cannot be dismissed by “spin” on the news. The losses will dwarf those caused by the sub-prime crisis and residential markets. In the short run, deflation will strengthen the dollar, but also add to the crushing weight of dollar denominated debt. US treasuries, already being shunned, will face a moment of truth in the not too distant future. Watch this bond market. When it falters and fails Bernanke has no other choice but to try and monetize the massive US debt load . This will spell the end of the dollar, already an anemic shadow of itself since “The Fed” came into existence with a pledge to maintain its value and stability.
Coming soon to a neighborhood near you: bank holidays, where you will face limits on daily cash withdrawals, a dollar collapse, a re-reckoning of international currency exchanges, and the kicker—price inflation the likes of which we have never seen. At the moment the massive deflation that is crushing the economy is the prevailing danger. Its opposite brother, inflation, will visit us later, perhaps years from now.
Throughout this desperate period businesses will continue to fail as the bailout money runs out. Watch how car sales fade away again to near nothing after the cash runs out for clunkers. We have borrowed from a future we never thought we would have to face. The future is nigh at hand, however, and we will face it sooner than we think.