Monsanto criminalizes seed banks

SUBHEAD: The criminalization of seed banking hidden inside Monsanto "food safety"regulations.  SOURCE: Jeri DiPietro ofstone@aol.com
  by Linn Cohen-Cole on 1 March 2009 in OpEdNews.com http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-criminalization-of-see-by-Linn-Cohen-Cole-090301-82.html Who would believe that seed banking will be criminalized or manure made illegal or that seed cleaning equipment is already illegal this year? They are all on a short list of "sources of seed contamination" in an innocent looking document within the FDA (though the absence of pesticides or chemical fertilizers from that list is a tip-off of who has had a hand in this).
image above: Seed bank photo from the Millennium Seed Bank at http://www.explore-kew-gardens.net/engMarch/textMM/msb1N.htm
"If there is no substantial public outcry heard before March 15 of 2009, it will be difficult to impossible for Granny to have laying hens, for your daughter to have a pony, or the organic farm across the street to grow veggies. Only in the last decade have the demon doctors of big agriculture finally come up with a plan so devilish that it just might succeed in running farmers off the land for good. Can you imagine America with no family farms? "Take a look at current House bills HR 814 and HR 875 (Senate version S.384). They are driven by Monsanto, a large corporation that has eyes on controlling all the world's agriculture. These bills will strangle family farms in red tape, and levy confiscatory fines, causing farmers to simply give up. Then the Big Ag corporations can grab their land, snapping it up at bargain prices." There are alleged "food safety" bills in Congress right now (HB 875, HB 814, SF 425 and possibly soon, HB 759) which are - to put it plainly and truthfullly - the death of organic farming and independent farming in America. One, at least, merges the USDA and FDA, immensely corrupted agencies, into a more powerful, centralized agency that gives even more power to Monsanto and other corporations which have influence there. These were introduced one week after Vilsack in a press conference said they weren't thinking of doing that yet [Do your best to remember the recent centralizing of all the intelligence agencies and the loss of rights that entailed for urban groups ... and then apply it many times magnified to rural people in our country in order to get an inkling of how things are working similarly. In both cases, multinational forces we fear are getting hold of massive tax-payer funding - in the name of safety from terrorists or safety from germs - to set up huge data banks and across the board spying and abrogate an endless list of civil and human rights. Now realize that on the farming side, the farmers will actually responsible for buying and maintaining the spying equipment, for staying accurately spied upon and file the reports on their own lives, for turning over DNA, for easements on their land to allow for warrantless entry onto property, or face ten years in prison and $500,000 penalties .] What is the FDA doing? "First, it is providing a means whereby key individuals on its payroll are able to obtain both power and wealth through granting special favors to certain politically influential groups that are subject to its regulation. This activity is similar to the 'protection racket' of organized crime: for a price, one can induce FDA administrators to provide 'protection' from the FDA itself. "Secondly, as a result of this political favoritism, the FDA has become a primary factor in that formula whereby cartel-oriented companies in the food and drug industry are able to use the police powers of government to harass or destroy their free-market competitors. "And thirdly, the FDA occasionally does some genuine public good with whatever energies it has left over after serving the vested political and commercial interest of its first two activities." - G. Edward Griffin, World Without Cancer. Hillary and Bill Clinton are deeply involved with Monsanto , often called the most evil corporation on earth. The people introducing these bills are friends of the Clintons and/or have their own close connections to Monsanto which is working aggressively to take control over food around the world, whether through patenting of seeds and animals, buying up fish farms in India or privatizing water - if you need it to survive so will be willing to pay through the nose for it, Monsanto is out there ahead of you, getting control over what you need . After doing your part, trust in the intelligence, our universe, and go back to farming, gardening, loving your neighbors and living peacefully.

Kauai Bee Keepers Association

SUBHEAD: Kauai beekeepers association comes together to protect the Garden Island

 By Jimmy Trujillo on 12 March 2009 in Island Breath - 
  (http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2009/03/kauai-bee-keepers-association.html)
 
Image above: Bees swarm on Norfolk pine sap at Banana Joe's on Kauai

Kauai Beekeeper's Association (KBEE) was formed in January of 2009 after a series of community meetings were convened and hosted by Jimmy Torio, an Anahola beekeeper. Election of KBEE's executive committee occurred at a community meeting on January 17 in Niumalu. KBEE was formed as a proactive effort to rally Kaua'i beekeepers, community members and government officials to take action and prevent the spread of the varoaa mite to Kauai from infested areas on the islands of Oahu and Hawaii. 

Contact: Jimmy Trujillo (808) 346 7725 jtluvmw@lava.net
Jose Bulatao (808) 337 9135 mrb@hawaiilink.net
Chris Kobayahsi (808) 639 1971 waioli2@hawaiiantel.net
Jimmy Torio (808) 652 0921 jktorio@hawaiilink.net

Website: http://kauaibuzz.blogspot.com/
 
KBEE-Board Of Directors  
Chris Kobayashi Debbie Erickson Jose Bulatao Francis Takahashi Amanda Oden George Costa COK Ex-Officio Matt Stevenson USDA Ex-Officio  
 
Executive Committee: Jimmy Trujillo Chair Erik Coppersmith Vice Chair Susan Zollinger Treasurer Ryan Wooton Secretary  
 
A note from Jose Bulatao: 
Honey Bees ...Perhaps nothing on our list of disappearing America is so dire; plummeting so enormously; and so necessary to the survival of our food supply as the honey bee. Very scary. 'Colony Collapse Disorder,' or CCD, has spread throughout the U.S. and Europe over the past few years, wiping out 50% to 90% of the colonies of many beekeepers -- and along with it, their livelihood. If this does not ring bells among ALL of us here in Hawaii, think about what will happen when the natural pollination "changes" drastically...
a. what will happen to the flowers to make leis to greet our visitors? b. how will our agricultural activities be affected? c. in which ways will our local economy be impacted?
Is this reason enough to make every attempt to collabortively work together to address the "plight of the honeybees" here in the State of Hawaii? 
 
 

Bees and Corn Syrup

SUBHEAD: Die-offs may wane as scientists probe bee diet. By Alan Bjerga on 13 March 2009 on Bloomberg News
Image above: Label graphics for "Beehive" corn syrup. A brand of table sweetener. From http://www.archives.gov.on.ca/English/exhibits/st_lawrence/big/big_18_label.htm
Ron Spears, a California beekeeper, says he’s breathing easier about his hives this year because the threat of honeybee extinction may be subsiding. Beekeepers, or apiarists, are investing more in food and cutting chemical levels in hives to withstand colony collapse disorder, the malady that helped wipe out about a third of the U.S. commercial hives in the past two years, Spears said. Scientists are studying the honeybee genome and relationships involving nutrition, pesticides and mites to resolve the phenomenon’s mystery.
This year’s first, and biggest, test of honeybee capability to pollinate $15 billion annually of U.S. plants -- California’s almond crop -- showed hive-health improvement, insect scientists and beekeepers said. The disorder, found in at least 35 states and Europe and Asia as well as in the plots of the animated comedy “The Simpsons” and the crime drama “CSI,” isn’t over, Spears said. Still, it seems more under control, he said. “It’s been three, four years since we’ve been able to say this, but there’s been enough bees,” Spears, who trucked half of his 20,000-bee colonies to the state’s Central Valley this year to fertilize the tree nut, said in an interview in Bakersfield, California. He feeds his bees sugar-derived pollen substitute rather than corn syrup. “People are understanding you better take care of them,” he said. After its identification in 2006, the disorder -- in which seemingly healthy bees suddenly flee their hives and die --helped destroy about a third of all U.S. beehives in 2007 and 2008, according to the Apiary Inspectors of America, a nonprofit organization. That’s more than twice the normal rate of hive loss, said Dennis vanEngelsdorp, the group’s president, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
for more:
see also:

Aren't we all Bernie Madoffs?

SUBHEAD: The Ponzi scheme of economic growth is coming unraveled.
By George Mobus on 12 March 2009 in Question Everything -
Image above: Falling house of cards. From (http://www.fotosearch.com/IDX034/394174)
Bernie (may I call you that, Bernie? I feel as if I know you well!) may be facing some of his 'victims' before going off to jail. Boo-fricking-hoo. You will probably think me heartless. A lot of people, some of whom were possibly innocent, lost a lot of money in Bernie's Ponzi scheme. But I have to ask: Is anyone who has dollar signs in their eyes and thinks they are about to become filthy rich without doing anything to earn that wealth aside from putting up some money in a no-lose proposition really a victim? Ponzi schemes, like all cons, work because someone is succored into believing they will get something for nothing. If you do something because of greed, can you be called a victim when things go badly? But then what about our whole economy? Isn't it a giant Ponzi scheme that relies on new "investors" coming into the "market" in order to support the "profits" of older investors? A "growth" economy is necessary in order to keep the scheme working. We need new workers with an expanding job market in order that they become consumers so that they will buy and use up junk produced from dwindling resources. Bernie got caught because suddenly there were few if any more new investors to scam. The financial implosion gave people pause and they were becoming more careful with what money they had left. No new investors and the Ponzi scheme unraveled. And now it looks like jail time for Bernie. Our growth-oriented, consumer-based, borrow-from-the-future economy has been a gigantic Ponzi. It depended on growth because that is the only way you could keep it going. The bankers knew this. The Wall Street crowd knew this. The economists knew this. They were the distributed 'Bernie Madoffs' who promoted the scheme. And the public, ever eager to buy SUVs and wide screen TVs were the suckers — they wanted to believe in magic and hedonistic consumption, so they bought the story hook, line, and sinker. The politicians probably didn't know it, but they wanted votes, and what got votes was to keep the 'dream' alive. Promise the public that they could have their cake and eat it too and they would keep their jobs. Ask me again why I claim that the average human being is lacking in sapience. What all of these believers failed to take into account is physics and the laws of nature. What they didn't know, couldn't have known in their willful ignorance, is that humanity had come to rely on a finite and exponentially dwindling energy source — fossil fuels — to build their civilization with. It takes a continued flow of energy just to maintain that civilization. And we are running out. Or, at least, our net energy available to do useful work is running out. Without energy to do real work, produce real wealth, all the paper and electronic dollars in the world are worthless. First to go is the confidence in the financial system that created money on the basis there would be plenty of wealth creation in the future to pay back for what we 'borrowed' now. But it isn't so. The decline in net energy is a one-way street that cannot be reversed by simply putting up a bunch of wind turbines and solar arrays. There probably is a steady-state equilibrium point wherein many fewer people can be sustained at a reasonable living standard using truly renewable energy sources without decimating the Ecos further. But I do mean MANY fewer people. And we are a long way from having that number as well as having the energy infrastructure to support them. The few voices that have been pointing out that infinite growth is an impossibility in a finite world have been drowned out by the promises and the promotions of those who seek to retain power and privilege; the rich seek to become richer. The foolish people didn't want to hear the message of the limits crowd in the first place. When the world was largely empty of human presence, growth of the population and technology seemed good and provided ever increasing conveniences. What was not to like about that phase of our species' existence? But we have long since filled this world up and are now seriously jeopardizing the future of the Ecos by taking a much bigger slice of the finite pie. It really is a zero-sum game, we just wanted to ignore that fact. We are all Bernie Madoffs. We are both greedy investors and Ponzi promoters. And, much as I hate to say it, President Obama has become the 'Berniest' of them all. He buys into the whole scheme. He has appointed two of the principle promoters as chief economics advisors who are hell-bent for leather to get the banks loaning again so that they can re-start the economy we had. This is the ultimate in foolishness. We could be using this opportunity to completely re-tool our economic system to move in the direction of balance and steady-state. We could re-envision education to be about developing the minds and hearts of people rather than about training them for jobs so they can become consumers. This is the perfect time to re-invent not just our culture, but to lead the world in understanding and accepting our limits, and learning to live equitably within those limits. Ah, but for the lack of wisdom we will instead commit societal suicide. See also:

Security for a Sustainable Kauai

SUBHEAD: Here's the Poster. See the next article for more details and schedule. WHAT: Food - Water - Energy Community Forum WHERE: Kalapaki Beach Park in Nawiliwili WHEN: Saturday 14th March 2009 from 9:00am-4:00pm
CONTACT:
Jimmy Trujillo 346 7725 tluvmw@lava.net Jose Bulatao 337 9135 mrb@hawaiilink.net Chris Kobayahsi 639 1971 waioli2@hawaiiantel.net Jimmy Torio 652 0921 jktorio@hawaiilink.net SCHEDULE:: 800 am - 9am Tent set up 900am - 1pm Swap Meet hosted by ZeroWasteKauai and the KauaiBeekeepers Association 10am-11am Media event for community organizations facilitated by KauaiBeekeepers Association 11am -12pm Economic Stimulus report from COK and state legislators 12pm- 2pm 2009 KIUC Board of Directors Meet and Greet Candidate Forum and community discussion on energy related issues 2pm-4pm KukaKuka wrap up of day's discussion

John Stewart and the Fifth Estate

SUBHEAD: Fake news exposes CNBC slimy stagecraft.
By Jeff Vail on 13 March 2009 in JEFFVAIL
I'm a bit surprised that John Stewart's "interview" of Jim Cramer hasn't garnered more attention. Manymedia outlets (with the notable absence of CNBC, which is pretending it didn't happen) have mentioned the existence of some "smack-down" between Stewart and Cramer, but few have give the content of the interview any analysis.
It was the most important piece of journalism of the financial crisis to date. Watch the whole interview from last night here. Notably--and this was the hidden theme of Stewart's criticism of Cramer and CNBC--it came from a self-professed "fake news show."
Maybe the Fourth Estate is hoping that, by giving the existence of this interview lip service, but pretending that it was only funny--rather than an indictment of the Fourth Estate itself--they could somehow marginalize Stewart's conclusions. If you haven't watched the interview, please do so. Then consider whether the main-stream press, regardless of which political market-segment they try to capture, can remain legitimate when it is fundamentally designed to opitimize profit, not distribute civilizationally-valuable and accurate information.
The unresolved question lingering around Stewart's interview is whether or not the problem we've encountered is "solveable," meaning that with proper regulation and reporting we can get back to business as usual and live in a world where investment returns are something more than, to quote Nassim Taleb, "money borrowed from destiny with a random payback time."
Regular readers will know that I think we're facing a phase-shift from perpetual growth to perpetual contraction, driven by diminishing energy supplies, ecological constraints, and diminishing returns on our investments in technology and other forms of complexity. Most people, I imagine, will refuse to accept this even if they realize that it is 100% true. What will this lead to? John Michael Greer has an excellent piece answering that question.
see also: Island Breath: Jon Stewart on Rick Santelli 3/13/09

Jon Stewart skewers CNBC

SUBHEAD: The Daily Show points a finger at Rick Santelli and others at the Wall Street focussed channel see also: Island Breath: Jon Stewart and Jim Cramer 3/13/09

Depleted Uranium Study Flawed

SOURCE: Sharon Rudolph shannonkona@gmail.com SUBHEAD: Wrong testing being used to correctly measure depleted uranium on our island. "I am particularly concerned that what is proposed by the U.S. Army for future (DU) studies at PTA will fall far short of providing the best information possible at this time, or for that matter, provide any information that can be used to develop a real rather than a speculative risk assessment." - Mike Reimer, PhD, Kona geologist, retired The following is a letter to the U.S. Army from Michael Reimer in regards to Depleted Uranium (DU) studies at Schofield Barracks, on Oahu, and Pohakuloa Training Area (PTA), on Hawaii.
image above:U.S. Army tank parked at Pohakuloa Training Area from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/5237049 Colonel Howard Killian, Deputy Director U.S. Army Installation Management Command Pacific Region 132 Yamanaga Street Fort Shafter, Hawaii 96858-5520 Dear Colonel Killian: I have had an opportunity to review the reports released from DU studies at Schofield Barracks and Pohakuloa Training Area. I also spoke with Dr. Lorrin Pang, some members of the Community Advisory Group, and met contractor Dr. Jeff Morrow. I agree with your statement that you mentioned in a previous communication we had, and that is to let the science speak. In that light, I am particularly concerned that what is proposed by the U.S. Army for future studies at PTA will fall far short of providing the best information possible at this time, or for that matter, provide any information that can be used to develop a real rather than a speculative risk assessment. DU is an issue of evolving study results and knowledge. There are some points that are immutable fact. We know that DU is present at Schofield and Pohakuloa. As I recall, the Army does not dispute the point of potential health risk. Therefore, we must take the best information we obtain today and use it to address the concerns about the level of health risks from potential exposure to DU. The citizens of the Big Island are concerned. This is a natural, often fearful, reaction anytime the word radiation is mentioned in our society. Yet, we live in a world with ubiquitous and unavoidable natural radiation, from cosmic rays to the foodstuffs that provide our sustenance. According to the position of the U.S. EPA, any and all ionizing radiation has the potential of causing cancer. Thus, there has to be a reasoned balance between unavoidable exposure and elective exposure. The past use of DU on the Big Island places exposure to that type of radioactive material in the “unavoidable exposure” category. This brings forth the question then of how much additional risk does it pose to the people of the Big Island including the military personnel stationed and working at Pohakuloa. I believe that with adequate study, this question can be answered with reasonable assurance. As I mentioned, I do not believe the currently planned study has the capacity to answer that question. The reason for my belief is that the study design is to measure total uranium and to show that it is below standards set by World Agencies for regulated exposures. This may present itself as a feel-good approach, but it is unfortunately misleading even with the rudimentary information we have today about the form and occurrence of uranium in the natural environment. In other words, the study as currently planned still leaves the door wide open on determining excess health risks, if any. The attached commentary contains suggestions on what additional information could be collected to help determine the risk. It is fair to assume that the information about the use of DU is as accurate as it can be. That is, the only use was in the Davy Crockett spotting rounds, no use of penetrating munitions occurred, that is the 20mm or 30 mm rounds from various Gatling configurations, smaller caliber rounds, or larger caliber armor penetrating munitions. It assumes that DU does not remain from any breach of containment if used as ballast or armor reinforcement, or any other possible presentation of DU. My comments are intended for a reasonably informed individual about DU issues; it is not overpoweringly technical but does use various standard abbreviations, chemical, isotopic, and radiological inferences and acronyms. For example, I use DU for depleted uranium and its various components, and natural uranium or NU for naturally occurring uranium. I am not suggesting that the uranium has a chemical, physical, or radiological difference. However, it is different in form and that is a significant difference for risk assessment. In addition, unless specifically mentioned, I do not separate radioactive decay into the three common particles, alpha, beta, and gamma radiation. Of special note is my use of the term “form” in describing uranium. Unlike the Hawaii Department of Health presentation (November 2007), I use form not to refer to the element uranium (and isotopes) but to describe its occurrence in a matrix – natural, alloy DU, or oxidized DU. This is a commentary; it is not a formal, peer-reviewed technical report although it may in some instances give the appearance of a peer review for the program. I do not duplicate information that can be found elsewhere and except in unusual or compelling circumstances, I do not provide references. For detail not presented here, I am sure various contractors you have will be able to address and clarify the concepts more fully. However, I am also willing to further explain my commentary for those issues that might be seen as some in a gray area of meaning. Sincerely, Michael Reimer, Ph.D., geologist, retired Kona Hawaii, Hawaii

Superferry Progress Report

SUBHEAD: With failing grades across the board, the Superferry is the biggest boondoggle in our history. SOURCE: Dick Mayer dickmayer@earthlink.net By Rob Parsons on 12 March 2009 on the Maui Time Weekly http://www.mauitime.com/Articles-i-2009-03-12-69023.113117_Superferry_Progress_Report.html#print
Image above: Local family rides the Superferry.. gets sick. From http://pvhawaii.blogspot.com/search/label/Personal After more than a full year of operation, it’s time to give the albatross of inter-island travel known as the Hawaii Superferry a progress report. Has the high-speed ferry service given indications it can be profitable in the long term? Has there been justification for Gov. Linda Lingle leading the charge, with state legislators close behind, to rewrite the state’s environmental laws to allow Superferry to operate? Has the entire state been taken for a choppy, 40 knots per hour, $45 million ride? And is this the biggest boondoggle in state history?
Living up to expectations and promises: D- In 2004, Hawaii Superferry’s (HSF) promotional pitch was for a convenient way to connect the islands, at half the cost of inter-island airfares. With Oahu as the hub, the “fast-ferry” would provide vehicle and passenger shuttles to Maui, Kauai and the Big Island. In the 18 months since HSF launched its service in September 2007 (with a special $5 rate that flaunted a Supreme Court decision days earlier that would have kept them docked until an Environmental Impact Statement was prepared) only the Maui route has materialized. Kauai issues have never been resolved in the year and a half since protesters paddled out to prevent the massive vessel from entering Nawiliwili harbor. The proposed route to Kawaihae Harbor on the Big Island hasn’t come to be either, as the arrival of HSF’s second vessel has been delayed while the Austal shipyard in Alabama fits it with a loading ramp that could make the state’s $38 million investment in a barge-and-ramp loading system obsolete. Wise use of taxpayer’s money: F Beyond the $40 million originally appropriated by the state legislature to support improvements to benefit HSF, recent articles and comments have highlighted millions more that have been or will be spent. Among the unbudgeted, additional costs are: repair of the barge and pier damaged in Kahului harbor from winter wave swells (over $3 million); cost of a special legislative session, passing Act 2 to overturn a court ruling requiring environmental review; cost of an oversight task force and inspections of vehicles; cost to prepare a “pseudo” EIS as required by Act 2 (nearly $2 million); and deployment of Coast Guard, police and undercover security on Maui and Kauai. Environmental sensitivity/protection: D Whale collisions and the spread of invasive species topped the list of environmental concerns raised by citizens, and highlighted the need for legal review before HSF could begin service. HSF claimed they had worked out a whale avoidance policy, with whale spotters, night vision technology, and routes to minimize entering sanctuary waters during peak season. But the high-speed, 349-foot long Alakai was delivered without forward-looking sonar technology and the 882-ton vessel regularly speeds through the Penguin Banks area between Molokai and Lanai, averting the longer, rougher route along Molokai’s north shore where whales are less frequently sighted. Vehicle inspections geared toward prevention of invasive species transport have turned up another problem—plundering of Maui’s marine resources. Inspectors confiscated hundreds of pounds of reef fish, limu (edible seaweed), opihi and even truckloads of river rock headed back to Oahu. With the oversight task force now disbanded, state inspection officers are no longer on the job, leaving the company employees responsible for monitoring what is transported. Government Integrity/accountability: D Repeatedly, HSF asked state officials and the public to trust them, and to expedite their approvals to allow them to prove their reliability. By and large, Gov. Lingle sloughed off criticism as though she were coated in Teflon and numerous state officials followed suit. Maui Rep. Joe Souki killed a House bill to require environmental review for HSF by refusing to schedule a hearing in his Transportation Committee. House Speaker Calvin Say—whose son is an HSF employee—led the charge during the special legislative session to pass Act 2. Attorney General Mark Bennett acted less like someone entrusted to interpret and enforce state laws in the public interest and more like Lingle’s personal lawyer. (A bit of good news: State Auditor Marion Higa issued her report in January, finding “that the legislation [Act 2] on behalf of Hawaii Superferry compromised the State’s environmental laws and set a worrisome precedent for future government accommodation that puts the interests of a single business before the State’s environmental, fiduciary, and public safety responsibilities.” Higa’s thorough audit is worthy of an A+, as are the efforts of State Sens. Shan Tsutsui, Kalani English, Gary Hooser and Russell Kokubun, who fought to heed community concerns and uphold laws requiring environmental review.) Meanwhile, HSF contributed handsomely to the campaign spending accounts of key politicians, including Lingle and Souki. A recent Hawaii State Ethics Commission report shows that HSF was tops in lobbying expenditures, with more than $380,000 spent during the past 14 months. Ease of travel and reliability: C Shortly after an unplanned trip to dry-dock in February 2008 for repairs (exacerbated when a tugboat dented the vessel, and when it shifted on its blocking, damaging both hulls) the Superferry resumed service. In early April, strong trade winds and ocean swells caused seasickness in more than half the passengers onboard. Again this past January, rough oceans nauseated passengers, damaged more than a dozen vehicles and forced cancellations. Under better weather conditions, the ferry service has earned praise from some of its regular commuters, and from visitors to Hawaii. Economic feasibility: F HSF has been unable to maintain vehicle and passenger loads of at least half-capacity, the stated operational break-even point. Fuel prices have vacillated greatly, which is of considerable concern given the Alakai’s fuel-inefficient engines (which burn an astounding 6,000 gallons of diesel per one-way trip). Even with the addition of fuel surcharges, passed through to ferry users, the cost to power the Superferry is potentially crippling. The infusion of large amounts of capital to bolster HSF by CEO John Lehman (leading neocon, New York City financier and Secretary of the Navy under President Ronald Reagan), has led many to believe he is less interested in seeing HSF succeed financially and more interested in doing a test run for the prototype Joint High Speed Vessel program. It is widely believed that Lehman’s investments in shipbuilding could be the principal reason for his involvement in promoting HSF, as an awarded Pentagon contract to construct the aluminum-hulled JHSV fast-catamarans could be worth billions of dollars.

Polihale access to be restored

SUBHEAD: Community volunteers plan to repair road access soon.
by Juan Wilson on 11 March 2009 for Island Breath -
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2009/03/polihale-access-to-be-restored.html)
Image above: Bruce Pleas, with yellow coffee mug, makes a presentation to "demonstrators" at Polihale gate. All photos by Juan Wilson
Some good news and some bad news. The good news is that access to Polihale may begin again as soon as April. The bad news is that the DLNR has plans for Polihale. Remember the Kokee plan. Shudder to think. But more on that later.
Late last night I got an email from Brad Parsons. It was a forwarded message from Steve Bemjamin, of the Surfrider Foundation Kauai Chapter. It said in part:
"Sorry for the late notice, but I just found out; Senator Gary Hooser and DNLR chief Laura Theilan will be at Polihale Wednesday morning at 10 AM. Please show your support for open beach access! There has been talk that it may take 18 months to 2 years to reopen access."
I got to the locked access gate about 9:30am and there was no one in sight. Eventually people started trickling in. Most had only heard of the demonstration for access this morning. Soon a small crowd was talking story about the sorry history of management of the state park by the Hawaii State Department of Land & Natural Resources (DLNR). The talk also ranged to the plans of the Navy and Syngenta and their interest in secrecy and security.
Shortly before 10:00am Bruce Pleas arrived and kind of took over. Talk story time was over. He had some announcements. He instructed us to be polite and not give the DLNR a hard time over the closing off of access. Bruce described how he had worked out a solution with local volunteer contractors to repair the rutted road and damaged ditch crossings.
This was great news. Bruce also told us that he, a kayak operator, and a contractor would accompany Gary and the DLNR personnel, but that those gathered to support the open access were not invited due to the hazardous conditions.
Bruce also told us that the DLNR had fixed the water pumps at Polihale (down for over a year) and that three of the five bathrooms were operational. This was DLNR pre-condition for re-opening the park. Had the DLNR gone through its normal procedures to repair the road and bridges it would have taken as long as two more years. Everybody seemed pleased with community action to get things going again. About that time Hawaii State Senator Gary Hooser arrived.
Bruce got some time with Gary Hooser and mentioned that there were other crucial things that needed to be done once the access road was open.
1) Establishing a life guard station at the park. YEA!
2) Providing a toilet at Queen's Pond. YEA! (make it a solar powered composting toilet not chemical one)
3) Putting up a kiosk at the entrance and screening park users BOO! Terrible idea - like the one in the DLNR master plan for Kokee.
image above: Senator Hooser, right, speaks with Bruce Pleas, left
I jumped in with my two cents. I told Gary and Bruce that ever since the Lingle administration got in they have been running departments of government as if they were enterprises, not social services; profit centers, and not public resources. BOO!
This kiosk sounds like the bad old days of Peter Young as chairperson of DLNR with his master plan for Kokee. Remember the entry gate and fee. Last week I heard a Syngenta employee talk of a $15 dollar per car fee to get into the park. This is the company that refused to pony up any money to fund road maintenance of the access road, yet uses the public road today to get to their north end GMO fields. Moreover, the DLNR was recently floating an idea to pave the road out to Polihale. BOOO!
Bruce is for the gate and not for the paving. Good but not good enough. Since he appears to be representing the "community" to the DLNR we need to get him some community ideas on plans for Polihale - both long and short term.
I would suggest that instead of a gate they go back to the arrangement I was familiar with back in the 70's at Polihale. The used to have at least one Parks & Recreation person stationed at the park daily. They tended the place and even took care of plants. They did not carry guns or wear the DLNR cop uniform. The park was beautifully maintained then.
Gary got on his cell phone and found out that Laura Theilen, The Chairperson of the DLNR was ill and could not make the meeting. Representing her for the DLNR would be its Chief Engineer, Eric Hirano, P.E. and State Park Program Director Steve Thompson.
image above: Those going in - Left to right - F. "Bully" Mission (DLNR) Bruce Pleas, Steve Thompson (DLNR), Gary Hooser and Eric Hirano (DLNR).
As DLNR people arrived the crowd swelled to about forty people. They were generally pleased that the park could be opened again in as little as a few weeks. I suggest that we now get to work on shaping what the park might become, despite the military and corporate influence that competes with our desires.
Some things to consider:
• All park power requirements generated by solar energy
• A bike path (the planned 6" gravel roadway is mighty rough)
• No signage for Queen's Pond area
• No vehicles on the beach. (If you can't carry it to your campsite, don't take it with you)
• Dune restoration (damaged by off-road vehicles)
• Restoration of some wetlands where there is now abandoned sugarcane
• Required contributions for park maintenance by the Navy subcontractors and GMO companies. (Raytheon, ITT, Syngenta, etc)
Contact Bruce Pleas at:
phone: 808-337-9509
write: PO Box 721, Waimea HI 96796
see also:

Bottled Water and Energy

SUBHEAD: There is no reason for bottled water on Kauai.
By Ken Taylor on 10 March 2009 in Island Breath - (http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2009/03/bottled-water-and-energy.html)

The growing consumption of bottled water raises questions about the product’s economic and environmental costs. Among the most significant concerns are the resources required to produce the plastic bottles and to deliver filled bottles to consumers, including both energy and water.

The Pacific Institute estimates that in 2006:

  • Producing the bottles for American consumption required the equivalent of more than 17 million barrels of oil, not including the energy for transportation
  • Bottling water produced more than 2.5 million tons of carbon dioxide
  • It took 3 liters of water to produce 1 liter of bottled water

Total U.S. Consumption of Bottled Water in 2006

According to the Beverage Marketing Corporation, Americans bought a total of 31.2 billion liters of water in 2006, sold in bottles ranging from the 8-ounce aquapods popular in school lunches to the multi-gallon bottles found in family refrigerators and office water coolers. Most of this water was sold in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles, requiring nearly 900,000 tons of the plastic. PET is produced from fossil fuels – typically natural gas and petroleum.

Energy Required to Make PET Plastic

According to the plastics manufacturing industry, it takes around 3.4 megajoules of energy to make a typical one-liter plastic bottle, cap, and packaging. Making enough plastic to bottle 31.2 billion liters of water required more than 106 billion megajoules of energy. Because a barrel of oil contains around 6 thousand megajoules, the Pacific Institute estimates that the equivalent of more than 17 million barrels of oil were needed to produce these plastic bottles.

Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Consumption of Bottled Water

The manufacture of every ton of PET produces around 3 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2). Bottling water thus created more than 2.5 million tons of CO2 in 2006.

Water Required to Make Bottled Water

In addition to the water sold in plastic bottles, the Pacific Institute estimates that twice as much water is used in the production process. Thus, every liter sold represents three liters of water.

Transporting and Recycling Bottled Water

More energy is needed to fill the bottles with water at the factory, move it by truck, train, ship, or air freight to the user, cool it in grocery stores or home refrigerators, and recover, recycle, or throw away the empty bottles. The Pacific Institute estimates that the total amount of energy embedded in our use of bottled water can be as high as the equivalent of filling a plastic bottle one quarter full with oil.

Sources:

Beverage Marketing Corporation estimate for 2006.

I. Bousted. 2005. Eco-profiles of the European Plastics Industry: Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET), (Bottle grade).

see also:

Island Breath: Big Island attracts plastic trash 11/9/08 Island Breath: The Sand, The Sun, The Squalor 1/21/07

Keep GMO regulation options

SOURCE: Maluia-WCMS maluiawcms.blogspot.com email: maluia-wcms@hotmail.com
SUBHEAD: GMO companies seeking to avoid regulations with bill HB1226.


Image above: View of Waimea Canyon Middle School where children have been made ill from Syngenta chemical spraying in adjacent fields. From WCMS website.

Please take a minute to write a letter in opposition of HB 1226. This Bill would preempt any effort to regulate an industry that has a long history of manipulating the democratic process at the expense of the environment and community health. It would also preclude attempts to establish pesticide free buffer zones around schools protecting children from exposure to Organoposphate pesticides used heavily in GMO cultivation. Please send this e-mail to a friend. Mahalo for your Kokua.
 
OPPOSE HB 1226 
RELATING TO GENETICALLY MODIFIED PLANT ORGANISMS. 
Prohibits state administrative regulatory actions and county regulatory actions from banning or otherwise regulating activities related to genetically modified plant organisms, with certain exceptions (HB1226 HD1) 

Write letters of opposition to: Hawaii State Legislature House of Representatives Agricultural Committee http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/site1/house/comm/commAGR.asp


.

Fish kill on Niihau

SUBHEAD: Niihauans are afraid to fish. Is the Navy to blame?

By Joan Conrow on 09 March 2009 in The Hawaii Independent
image above: GoogleEarth underwater view of west Niihau from the near PMRF from 1600ft below sea level

It’s been weeks since a massive fish kill was discovered on Niihau, but those living on the privately-owned island remain afraid to eat the reef fish that are a dietary staple.
“For the Niihauans, fishing isn’t a hobby, it’s how they put food on their table,” said Don Heacock, the state aquatic biologist on Kauai. “It’s one of the few places in Hawaii nei where people are still practicing traditional subsistence fishing. And now they’re afraid to eat the fish because they don’t know what happened to them.”

Bruce Robinson, whose family owns the island that lies off Kauai’s western shore, first spotted fish washing ashore on Jan. 17, but did not contact state officials until Feb. 2, when he brought Heacock a sample of about 100 dead fish.
“But very few were fresh and most were seven or more days old,” said Heacock, who selected the freshest fish he could find from the sample and gave it to Thierry M. Work, a federal wildlife disease specialist, for a necropsy.
Work found that the fish had suffered severe trauma to the gills. “The most significant finding was the acute inflammation and swelling of the gills that was suggestive of an acute insult,” according to the necropsy report. “One possibility is some sort of chemical irritant, however, the identity of such a cause cannot be determined based on available information.”
Heacock said he observed hundreds of dead fish on Niihau and many had distended swim bladders, a phenomenon more typically associated with deepwater fish that are brought up to the surface. Fish use their swim bladders to “sense, hear and feel sounds and vibrations underwater,” he said.
“If there was a very large underwater explosion, for example, fish would feel that, and if it was loud enough, it could kill them,” Heacock said. “It could destroy organs and tissue.”
In response to concerns that the fish might have died during an illegal fishing operation using bleach, Work researched the scientific literature and found that “exposure to chlorine causes a distinct lesion, which I did not observe in this particular fish. If I was going with the literature, I would not suspect chlorine,” Work reported.
Heacock said that Robinson also reported a baby humpback had washed ashore on Niihau on Jan. 21. Based on photographs, Heacock said the whale was “very fresh. I could see no noticeable external signs of trauma, but it was laying on one side and I don’t know what was under that.”A large swell apparently washed the calf away before Heacock and others were able to get to Niihau on Feb. 4, where they collected dead fish and monk seal scat and observed several seals, which appeared healthy.
On Feb. 9, another humpback calf washed ashore on a section of beach between Kekaha and Kauai’s Pacific Missile Range Facility. The whale had several broken ribs, but it’s unknown whether that injury occurred before or after the whale died, Heacock said. Necropsy results are still pending.
“We don’t know if the fish kills and the two baby whales washing ashore are related, but they might be,” Heacock said. “We do not know if there was some kind of sonic experiment or sonar testing going on. We do know there were military activities going on during that period. Several commercial fishermen said they’d seen some large Navy ships, Marine Corps helicopters and even Australian ships around Niihau in that time period.”
Paul Achitoff, an attorney with Earthjustice, said that the Navy’s counsel confirmed that the January 2009 undersea warfare training exercise (USWEX) began at 4 p.m. Jan. 15 and ended at noon Jan. 18.
The Navy did use mid-frequency active sonar during antisubmarine training exercises last year. However, PMRF spokesman Tom Clements refused to confirm whether the Navy had used sonar during this year’s USWEX, or even that military activities had been conducted at all.
“If an anomaly occurred at that time that people are trying to connect to our activities, we’re saying they were no different than the activities that have been done on the range over the past 40 years,” Clement said.
Marine mammal strandings have occurred in Hawaii following sonar exercises, including two pygmy sperm whales that washed up on Maui and Lanai after the April 2007 USWEX and a beaked whale that came ashore on Molokai during one of the exercises last year. In July 2004, a pod of melon-head whales came into Hanalei Bay shortly after the Navy used sonar. The Navy contends there is no connection between such strandings and sonar use, but has never released any necropsy reports on the dead animals.
In a response to an email posing additional questions, Clements wrote: “As far as ‘loud noises underwater,’ as you know, there are many anthropomorphic sources of sound in the water, including recreational and commercial boat traffic that crosses our range. Our activities that can cause sound in the water are managed and quantified, as expressed in the Hawaii Range Complex EIS completed in 2008.
“And regarding the introduction of toxic or noxious chemicals, if your question refers to operations specifically designed to test or train with or against chemical agents, than the answer is ‘no.’ The PMRF range did not have any spills or accidents resulting in unintended releases. Most human activities on and in the water can potentially introduce chemicals into the ocean, from sunscreen to diesel fuel emissions.”
When asked whether any intended chemical spills or releases occurred, and why the Navy declined to comment on the date or nature of its activities, Clements replied in a second email: “I believe I did respond within the context of the question by distinguishing between intended (operations specifically designed) and unintended (spills or accidents). Not commenting specifically on all-inclusive military operations within a given parameter of dates is not unusual.”
Heacock said he recommended that state officials ask the Navy for more information about the activities it was conducting when the fish and whales died. He also suggested testing samples collected from the fish kill for contaminants under the National Water-Quality Assessment program (NAWQA), but state and federal officials balked at the $15,000 price tag.
“I only recommended that because we’re dealing with human health and safety issues,” Heacock said.
“The [state] Department of Health issued warnings not to eat fish if it smelled or tasted strange, but there are many toxins with no odor and no taste. The Niihauans have a right to know what happened to their fish.”
Both Heacock and Work said fish kills and marine mammal strandings should be reported immediately so necropsies can be conducted before the animals begin to decompose.

The Inflection Is Near?

SUBHEAD: Evil Parasitic Caterpillar that has Been Eating Thomas Friedman’s Brain Finally Dies!
By Sharon Astyk on 09 March 2009 in Casaubon's Book
http://sharonastyk.com
Image above: Close-up of THomas Friedman's mouth on "Meet The Press". From
Thomas Friedman, uncritical neo-classical economist, whack job proponent of globalization and porn-star-style mustachioed New York Times columnist has actually decided that growth is bad. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/opinion/08friedman.html?_r=2
This stunning development occurred after the evil, parasitic alien caterpillar that has been residing on his upper lip died, ending its multi-year position controlling all of Friedman’s brain activity. This is the only possible explanation for a sudden shift to rationality from a man who has done more to encourage the globalizing destruction of all hope for sustainability than most.
In a news conference, Friedman also renounced the “science” of economics, and vowed to help develop a new steady state economy. He also reassured those who would miss his famous look that despite the death of his parasite, he’d be keeping its corpse on his upper lip, since he’s gotten used to it.
(Ok, the last part isn’t true. But the article is, and this is the only way I can think of that really makes sense ;-)).
see also:

Is Tom Friedman getting it?

SUBHEAD: The year when ‘The Great Disruption’ began or a place at the table with a clown hat on.
By George Mobus on 08 March 2009 in Question Everything
Image above:Detail of portrait of Thomas Friedman modified by Juan Wilson. From
http://blog.puppetgov.com/2009/01/19/terrorism-on-the-new-york-times-op-ed-page
Last Jan. I wrote "Tom Friedman connects some of the dots", after finishing his last book, "The World is Hot, Flat, and Crowded." I criticized Tom for being too enamored with the neoclassical model of economics, free markets, growth, etc. Imagine my surprise and delight at Tom's opinion piece this morning?
Let’s today step out of the normal boundaries of analysis of our economic crisis and ask a radical question: What if the crisis of 2008 represents something much more fundamental than a deep recession? What if it’s telling us that the whole growth model we created over the last 50 years is simply unsustainable economically and ecologically and that 2008 was when we hit the wall — when Mother Nature and the market both said: "No more."
The whole piece is exhilarating simply because Friedman is influential. Love him or hate him (I have very often disagreed with his conclusions but respect his observational skills) he is influential. So when Tom Friedman says the classical economic model of growth based on increasing sales is working against our best long-term interests I find this cause for rejoicing.
He even quotes Joe Romm (climateprogress.org) who has been largely motivated by the desire to prevent radical climate change by reducing our carbon footprint. As my readers probably know by now I think we will run over the cliff of peak oil sometime sooner than we face truly catastrophic effects from climate change. Nevertheless Joe has been getting the relationship between consumption and energy use/carbon dioxide generation for a long while. The main point is that fossil fuel energy consumption, resulting in accelerating depletion of natural resources and fouling of our world, simply cannot be sustained any longer.
And now Tom seems to get it. One more group of dots connected by the NY Times columnist. Will his next book be called "The World is Hot, Flat, Crowded, and Needs to Contract!" Read the full article here.

Chinese buzz HSF-like navy ship

SUBHEAD: It looks a lot like the Superferry and is out there sniffing the Chinese.
SOURCE: heads-up on story from Fabio Marshall U.S. Pentagon statement on 9 March 2009 as reported on InTheNews.co.uk http://www.inthenews.co.uk/news/world/autocodes/countries/china/chinese-boats-buzz-us-navy-vessel-$1275867.htm
Image above: USNS Impeccable (T-AGOS 23) at sea. From http://www.msc.navy.mil/inventory/ships.asp?ship=106&type=OceanSurveillanceShip The United States is to lodge an official complaint with the Chinese authorities after one of its navy vessels was intimidated by boats in the South China Sea. The Pentagon has released details of the latest in a line of "increasingly aggressive" acts by Chinese ships. According to the department of defence the USNS Impeccable - an ocean surveillance ship - was forced to spray crewmen with water from fire hoses when five Chinese boats came within 50ft on Saturday, 75 miles south of Hainan.
Navy states USNS Impeccable is one of the five Ocean Surveillance Ships that are part of the 25 ships in Military Sealift Command's Special Mission Ships Program. "On March 8th 2009, five Chinese vessels shadowed and aggressively manoeuvred in dangerously close proximity to USNS Impeccable, in an apparent coordinated effort to harass the US ocean surveillance ship while it was conducting routine operations in international waters," the Pentagon said. "The Chinese vessels surrounded USNS Impeccable, two of them closing to within 50ft, waving Chinese flags and telling Impeccable to leave the area. "Because the vessels' intentions were not known, Impeccable sprayed its fire hoses at one of the vessels in order to protect itself. The Chinese crew members disrobed to their underwear and continued closing to within 25ft." A spokesman added that two Chinese ships then proceeded to overtake the Impeccable and drop wood in front of its path, forcing the vessel into an emergency stop. Beijing repeatedly clashes with other navies in the South China Sea, which it considers exclusively its territorial waters.
Image above: Impeccable built in 2001 at Halter Marine Shipyard in Mississippi provided with both active and passive sonar capabilities.From http://www.msc.navy.mil/annualreport/2001/pm2.htm
[Editor's Note: Remember the Hawaii Superferry was built with a $140 million loan from the U.S. Maritime Administration that requires it fulfill duty as part of U.S. military sea lift operations (in time of emergency). Will the upgrade to the second ferry and the retro-fit to the first ferry include whale-killing active and passive sonar capability?]
See also:

The Good Food Revolution

SOURCE: Koohan Paik (kosherkimchee@yahoo.com) SUBHEAD: What can Kauai teach us about food and sufficiency? By Claire Hope Cummings on 8 March 2009 in Yes Magai(http://www.yesmagazine.org/article.asp?ID=3283) [Editor's Note: This is a small excerpt from the beginning of Claire's article. Click on link above for full article.] Image above: A view looking northeast towards PMRF and Syngenta GMO fields on Kauai from GoogleEarth. The island of Kaua‘i is one of the most beautiful and fragile places on earth. From above, it looks like a vibrant green flower, lush and pulsing with life, floating in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. The Hawaiian tourist industry calls it “The Garden Isle,” comparing it to the Garden of Eden. The image of Hawai‘i has always been sold as a “paradise.” But there is another side to life on this island, one that visitors rarely see. The west side of this tiny island is home to the U.S. military’s Pacific Missile Range and testing grounds, part of the longstanding military occupation of the Hawaiian islands, and to the headquarters of giant agrochemical corporations Syngenta and Dupont. These corporations test and produce genetically modified crops on former sugar plantation lands here and throughout Hawai‘i, along with toxic herbicides, insecticides, and fertilizers. It is the very worst of America’s “agrochemical military industrial complex,” imposed on the ancient homelands of a rich traditional farming and fishing culture, in the midst of some of the world’s most precious biodiversity. When I visited the west side of Kaua‘i in 2006, the local newspapers were full of reports of children from Waimea Canyon School who had been sickened by chemicals used on nearby test plots. As many as 60 people were affected, including teachers and staff. It happened again in 2007, with school children suffering nausea, headaches, and dizziness. In 2008, for the third time in three years, chemicals being tested for industrial agriculture sickened children and adults and sent them to clinics and the emergency room with tears in their eyes, holding their heads in their hands, or vomiting. The corporations responsible for the tests deny any role in the incidences. But the open air testing of chemicals and genetically modified crops is a now a persistent worry for people living in this small rural community. Local activists have suggested that the welcome sign at the Kaua‘i airport be changed to warn tourists of what is going on there: “Welcome to the Mutant Garden Island.” Instead of being a source of health and well-being for the land and people, the American system of industrial agriculture has become a source of problematic food and even fear. The connection to the military is the key to understanding how this tragedy came about. Most of the toxic chemicals used in agriculture came from the implements of war, such as nerve poisons and defoliants developed during World War II. And our military has been repeatedly used to impose our system of industrial agriculture on other lands, depriving traditional farmers of their livelihoods and redirecting their natural resources to the use of U.S. business interests. American plantation owners used the military to force the monarchy of Hawai‘i out of power. The takeover of Hawai‘i—the imposition of plantation agriculture on Hawai‘i’s traditional system and the conversion of the Hawaiian people to a Western lifestyle—is a case history and a warning for all of us concerned about the future of food. We are facing an urgent problem: Given global warming, growing populations, and declining natural resources, how will we feed ourselves? Before colonization, Hawaiians had a sophisticated system of land, water, and ocean resource use that fed populations equal to or even greater than those on several of the islands today (excluding the urban populations of O‘ahu). Now, residents of Hawai‘i import 85 percent of their food. The descendants of the first Hawaiians, like most native peoples who have been colonized, suffer from some of the worst poverty and diet-related health problems of anyone living in the United States. The food being imported into Hawai‘i is produced, processed, packaged, and transported using enormous amounts of fossil fuels. By one measure, the current U.S. food system uses 10 times more energy than it produces in the form of food calories. Even if you like industrial agriculture, its built-in obsolescence is a problem. When oil production peaks, and prices rise again, as they inevitably must, food in Hawai‘i will become unaffordable. What will happen when the gas pumps and grocery store shelves are empty? This is a question all of us will face, sooner or later, since we are all on what David Brower called “Earth Island,” a small planet floating in a sea of space. For more click here: http://www.yesmagazine.org/article.asp?ID=3283
Image above: Hawaiian "Living Farm" at Hipahulu on Maui, Hawaii. See www.kipahulu.org
See also:

Adapting in Place - And When Not To

SUBHEAD: A course on adapting in place considers if you should relocate first. By Sharon Astyk on 3 March 2009 in SharonAstyk.com http://sharonastyk.com/2009/03/03/adapting-in-place-and-when-not-to
[Editor's Note: Sharon is starting a class called Adapting In Place. Its about survival and sustainability. Her website heading is "Ruminations on an Ambiguous Future". Below are a few paragraphs from first piece in her series. She lists reasons not to adapt in place before going on to discuss how to do so. She lists some reasons for considering relocation.] Image above: The proverbial log cabin with a satellite dish is one kind of adjustment. From at http://pro.corbis.com. Some reasons for considering relocation:If you have young children or are elderly, have close ties somewhere but are living far away from them in a community that you are not invested in. Not everyone has people (family biological or chosen) who will give you a place at the table, thin the soup to make it stretch, let you sleep on their couch and otherwise cover your back. But if you do, recognize that these people are the beginnings of your tribe. Not all of us have tribes in one place - and some of us have multiple tribes. But if you aren’t rooted where you are in some deep way, if you live there primarily for a job, and you can get back to your people think about it seriously.

If you plan to move anyway. That is, if you have a family place or somewhere you have always planned to return to, if you can, now is probably the best time. It takes time to build soil. It takes time to get to know people. It takes time to see fruit trees come to maturity. If you were planning on going anyway after a few more years of earning, or something, now might be the right time. That said, however, I’d be awfully cautious about buying, and only recommend this *if you can* leave - either by selling your current place or if you’ve been renting. But building roots is important.If you aren’t prepared to live in the place you live as its culture demands. That is, as we get poorer and travel and transit become bigger issues, living in the country is going to be a lot different than it is now - instead of living essentially a suburban life, commuting to activities not available and relying on trucked in supplies, you may have to shop occasionally and mostly stay home in the country, making your own entertainment. Are you prepared to do that? Urban dwellers may have to make do in tougher conditions as infrastructure problems come up. My own analogy is this - if you’d be ok living in the worst neighborhood in your city as most of the people there live now, you’ll probably be fine. But if you’ve been affluent and comfortable and might not be forever, be sure you can afford the city and like the life. I believe strongly that city, suburb (most of them) and country all have a future - but the differences between them are likely to become more acute. If you aren’t prepared to deal with those differences, you might consider moving.Our native knowledge of our place is valuable - in fact, it may be the most powerful tool we have. Now some of us will have to leave our native places, to journey again as people so often have. But if we can stay where we are, knowing our flora and fauna, knowing what grows where and how things smell when the seasons change and how to heal or feed or tend with what is native here is absolutely valuable - as is the ability to adapt that knowledge as our places change. So if there is a place where you feel at home, and no other constraints bind you, perhaps you will want to go there, and be there, and help other people be there. See also:

Ea O Ka Aina: Adapting in Place 2/4/09