KIUC Board Candidates Forum

SUBHEAD: This may be the last chance for a more progressive KIUC.
WHAT: A public forum for debate and questions regarding the upcoming Kauai Island Utility Cooperative board election WHEN: Thursday, February 26th, 2009 - 6:30 to 8:30pm (doors open at 6:00pm) WHERE: Kauai Community College Student Lounge, located above the cafeteria.
CONTACT: Andrea Brower andrea@malamakauai.org (808)-635-1659
A coalition of Kaua`I business, sustainability and student organizations has formed to bring attention to the Kaua`i Island Utility Cooperative (KIUC) Board elections. There is heightened concern and community discussion about our Island's vulnerability as we are so heavily dependent on imported fossil fuels to generate our electricity. Moving towards a sustainable energy future is no longer seen as an option, it is understood to be a necessity. How can KIUC continue to provide a reliable level of electricity to our community and make this transition to energy sustainability? The speed and ease of this transition will rely upon good leadership, beginning with our KIUC Board of Directors. The KIUC Board, through their decisions, policies, and contracts, will be responsible for determining our Island's energy future. Serving on the board is a position that requires serious commitment and an astute understanding of the issues. In order to assist co-op members to make informed voting decisions, a candidates forum will be held on Thursday, February 26 from 6:30-8:30pm at the Kaua`i Community College Student Lounge, located above the cafeteria. Doors will open at 6. The forum will also be aired on Ho`ike. For a schedule of showing times, visit www.MalamaKauai.Org. KIUC Board elections will take place during March. Ballots will be mailed out separately from electric bills. All completed ballots must be returned to KIUC by March 28. This event is being sponsored by Apollo Kaua`i, ASUH – KCC Student Government, Lihu`e Business Association, Kaua`i Chamber of Commerce, Kaua`i Planning & Action Alliance, and Malama Kaua`i.

Yellow Brick Road ~ Redux

SUBHEAD: To survive this crisis we'll need cool heads, caring hearts, courage, and a little hope.

By John Schettler on 23 February 2009 in The Writing Shop
http://www.writingshop.ws/html/yellow_brick.html


Image above: detail of Illustration based on characters from The Wizard of Oz". From http://www.beckersbakeryanddeli.com/images/Cakes/Wizard%20of%20Oz.jpg
 
It was a terrible storm, and the house shuddered and shook so hard we thought we might lose it. We woke up the next morning in a very strange place, after the value of our homes took a freefall through the whirlwind of the blown housing bubble. Suddenly the landscape of our lives looked completely different. This wasn’t Kansas anymore!

Little munchkin news pundits were singing strange songs about CDOs and CEOs on the news, and we looked with horror (or delight) to see that our house had fallen on a very bad witch. The one good thing about the housing bust, I suppose, is that it brought down George Bush and his Republican party. But we were lost—where was all that re-fi money? Where were all the bankers competing for our business? Why was our credit card refused at Home Depot? Not to worry…

A Good Witch showed up and gave us the golden slippers of hope. We could get back to Kansas, it was promised, if we but follow the yellow brick bailout road—straight to the city of Oz where the Wizard holds forth. He’d tell us how we can get home again to the old, comfortable lives we were all so familiar with. And we could take the Tin Man of consumerism and the Straw Men in the banks and the Cowardly Lions in congress along for the ride.

That’s been the promise, after all, that if we just calm down and stay on the yellow brick road, we’ll get back to the good old days of endless revolving credit, easy finance, weekends in the shopping mall, mindless hours before the flat screen TV, and cheap gas. That’s been the promise of America that we all bought into at 29.99% interest—a promise served up in the great money green emerald city of Oz—Wall Street. Suddenly the system isn’t delivering anymore. Something went wrong.

Oil Can! Oil Can! How’s a decent consumer supposed to swing the axe into those blue light specials when credit is frozen? And who are all these little securities fraud monkeys swooping down on Wall Street to throw our straw money every which way, until the guts of this nation are scattered all over the place? That’s $700 billion over there, and there’s another $300 billion over there, and then a big fat trillion over there!
The Cowardly Lions in congress were frightened to death, holding their tails with fear an trepidation when Paulson whispered “Martial Law.” We fell asleep in the poppy fields of delusion, and almost lost our way. Most Americans have awakened to the crisis now, but they are still thinking that if we just get to Oz, the Wizard of Wall Street, Old Ben Bernanke himself, will show us the way home. There’s a sign on the door there now, and a surly guard bars the way.

The sign reads:
NOBODY GETS IN TO SEE THE WIZARD. NOT NOBODY, NOT NO HOW!

 But we coo so sweetly that the door finally opens. And the hope we brought with us is that all the Tin Man consumers will get shined up in the buffers, take heart again, and get back on the streets to shop. And all the Straw Men in the banks will have fresh new dollars stuffed in their bellies, and finally get some brains.

And that all the Cowardly Lions in congress and government will get some courage back again and take on a debt load fatter than a hippopotamus, thrashing it all from top to bloated bottomus. But we just want to go home, that’s all—back to the smell of apple pie, and the sound of grandma working in the kitchen, back to the baseball game on the radio while we mow the lawn on Saturday afternoon—back to the Kansas we once knew and loved.
The Wizard is great and terrible! He huffs and puffs and vents steam as his balance sheet bloats up to the breaking point. But behind the great kabuki theatre of the Treasury and Fed, with all the bailout plans and stimulus packages, we realize that there is just a tired, old, frightened man. He can pull the interest rate levers, and fire up the money presses but, in the end, he’s really lost control of the whole damn show. We put our faith in the Wizard, and he let us down—or did he? I seem to recall that the movie ends on a happy note after all, when Dorothy realizes that she had the power to return to Kansas all along, right in those golden slippers of hope!
That’s the moment we have yet to realize as a people—that the Wizards on Wall Street can’t save us, and Capital Hill can’t save us, and more spending just can’t save us at all. It’s up to us. We have to close our eyes to the fantasy that things will quickly return to the same old ways, and we have to click our heels to set our resolve to build something new in this country. If we don’t, I’ll guarantee you that there’s another Wicked Witch out there with an army of harpies that will be all too happy to take those slippers away and take charge of things again. You think the Neocons all died after Bush left office? They already have their eyes firmly set on 2012, waiting with warnings of terror, this time nuclear and biological terror according to Dick Cheney, and that will that will surely get their old game going again.
So this is the moment.
We’ve followed the Yellow Brick Road all the way to Oz and realized that the promises made to us by the Wizard will just not do. We have to do something if this nation is to survive. It’s not up to Obama, or Geithner, or Bernanke any more. It’s not up to Citigroup or Bank of America.

It’s up to us.
Ok… now what?

What do we do?
This is the question at the end of so many blog entries I read these days, and it’s hanging out there like a untucked shirt, unanswered. There is a realization that the “system” as we have known it all our lives has come to a grinding halt and failed. There is a kernel of hope that we can get it started again, but a sinking fear that all the plans and dollars we’ve been throwing at the problem thus far will just not work.

Name brand analysts like Nouriel Roubini, George Soros, and even the late great Wizard Alan Greenspan himself have been coming to the conclusion that we have to do something more drastic. There’s been talk of nationalizing the big banks, long insolvent with the over-leveraged weight of all their bad securities schemes. Yet even that task seems so massive that no one seems to know how to proceed. We are stuck, still clinging to the fantasy that the old “system” can be restored to health. It cannot. The debt is simply too massive, and no amount of straw will make that scarecrow stand up again.
What do we do?
The new government, riding a wave of popular sentiment and the promise of change and hope, seems to be bent on simply restoring the old system that failed us so badly. James Kunstler’s acerbic pen summed it up nicely in his Feb 23 post: “The sad truth is that banking has become a Chinese fire drill—a frantic act of futility—as insolvent companies persist in covering up their losses in order to avoid the counter-party hell of credit default swaps that would ring the world's "game over" bell. This can only go on so long. All the chatter about "nationalizing" the banks really boils down to what kind of bankruptcy work-out will they be put through, how destructive will the process be, and how much of the pain can be shoved forward in time to people now in diapers and their descendants.”
Kunstler is just one of many reasoned voices on the bloggosphere pointing out the basic fallacy that a return to the old system is nothing more than wishful thinking at this stage of our economic crisis. Yet he is not simply shouting nay at the powers that be. He long ago offered us a roadmap of the future he sees as imperative—one that is built around smaller, decentralized, sustainable, and more self-sufficient communities—not the great sprawl of suburbia thrumming with the incessant hum of four cylinder engines.

And Kunstler is correct when he offers this strongly worded advice to President Obama: “Among the questions that disturb the sleep of many casual observers is how come Mr. O doesn't get that the conventional process of economic growth—based, as it was, on industrial expansion via revolving credit in a cheap-energy-resource era—is over, and why does he keep invoking it at the podium? Dear Mr. President, you are presiding over an epochal contraction, not a pause in the growth epic. Your assignment is to manage that contraction in a way that does not lead to world war, civil disorder or both… If contraction and downscaling are indeed the case, then the better question is: why don't we get started on it right away instead of flogging rescue plans to restart something that is DOA?”
Peggy Noonan seemed to capture the mental confusion that false hopes bring as she reminisced on the golden days of the computer revolution while making a Wi -Fi connection from an airliner over the Rockies:

“It was a time so full of genius and dynamism that it went beyond words like "breakthrough" and summoned words like "revolution." If you were paying attention, if you understood you were witnessing something great, the invention of a new age, the computer age, it caught at your throat. It was like hearing great music. People literally said what had been said in the age of Thomas Edison:

"What will they think of next?"

What a buoyant era... That was 25 years ago. The world was on fire. It has cooled. And the essential problem with the crash we're in is no one can imagine quite feeling that way again. People can remember it, but they can't quite re-summon it. This isn't like the stock market crash of 1987 or the collapse of the dot-com bubble in 2001 . People are not feeling passing anger or disappointment, they're feeling truly frightened. The reasons: This isn't stock market heebie-jeebies, it's systemic collapse.”
 
It has taken a very long time for the “system” itself to admit that. I might argue that the banks, with their off balance sheet juggling game, remain in denial about their insolvency—and the ex-bankers now in their new government posts share the same delusion. The question remains: what to do about it? We have seen the natural reactions people take, hunkering down and making do. People have made what I call changes of necessity.

Some have finally faced the insoluble weight of the debt they accrued and filed bankruptcy to start over—and thank God Jefferson’s own experience with debt led him to become a champion, along with Franklin, of the basic right to a fresh start as defined in the bankruptcy laws. It should come as no surprise that the Republican controlled congress under Bush worked feverishly to revise and weaken the bankruptcy protections, making it more difficult for people to discharge debt, just before this easily foreseeable financial crisis swept over America. As the Church Lady might say: “How convenient!”
Other people have moved back home, or with relatives. Former homeowners have become new renters after losing their slice of the American Dream to foreclosure. Most have cut back spending and started trying to save. Some have planted gardens. Farmers Markets are starting up in cities and towns all over the country.

 Bartering is slowly becoming more prevalent. And on the other side of the line, scam artists, like the good old carpet baggers, have flooded the Internet with all sorts of phony scams. I was delighted to learn yesterday that my email address had been selected by the Netherlands National Lotto to receive one million Euros! Bottom feeders have been gobbling up distressed properties in foreclosure auctions. They smell blood in the water, even though the bottom is still nowhere in sight for residential real estate, and the crisis in the $25 trillion dollar commercial RE sector is just starting to warm up.
 
These coping behaviors, or the misguided opportunism of the scam artists, are just the leading edge of the changes we must make if we are ever to find anything that remotely resembles Kansas again. Slowly, reluctantly, the “powers that be” are seeing one high priest after another break from the common faith of rescue plans to advocate more drastic measures. Some call for nationalization of the banks, a task so enormous that I wonder if they realize just what it will entail. I have called for this as well, but I realize that a bank like Bank of America alone would dwarf the FDIC’s ability to make an orderly takeover, both in terms of dollars to back up deposits and staff to manage the 5800 branches in the US. Now throw in Citigroup, and probably JP Morgan-Chase as well—and remember that old JP already swallowed over 5000 WaMu branches when that bank failed. Clearly nationalizing and ‘cleaning up the system’ for a restart will be an enormous task.
The NY Times believes it can be done, however: “The United States has a successful history of seizing insolvent banks through the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The takeovers contemplated here are larger in scale and would be more complex than those that have generally fallen under the FDIC’s purview. But the notion that the government totally lacks the know-how to nationalize insolvent banks is not valid.” The proof of that will be in the pudding. Just making good a guarantee on deposits will be a huge enough task for the FDIC.

Managing the newly nationalized banks could only be accomplished by decapitating the top of the staffing pyramid while leaving the rank and file middle managers and employees in place. It will be a scary and difficult task, but if it doesn’t happen we’ll continue down this yellow brick road of denial and delusion, and the crisis will only be drawn out, with more protracted misery on Main Street. The big banks have to be broken up into smaller regional entities and rebuilt from the ground up. The Boyz the led them have to go.

We’ll spare then the guillotine for now, though timely investigations and vigorous prosecution would be a step that would restore faith on Main Street. The fat cats like Stanford and Madoff must lose everything—everything. The banks can no longer be allowed to be “too big to fail.” They have failed—failed us all.
In her article, Peggy Noonan tried to visualize the next great wave of innovation and “growth” that would then restore America to greatness. She was wise enough to realize that both the financial elite and the political stooges they have bought in Washington will have to be reformed. Yet she saw the regeneration of America starting not on with a newly rebuilt and reformed Wall Street, but rather in the humdrum garages of the common man on Main Street. “Just as our political regeneration will happen locally,” Noonan wrote, “in counties and states that learn how to control themselves and demonstrate how to govern effectively in a time of limits, so will our economic regeneration. That will begin in someone's garage, somebody's kitchen, as it did in the case of Messrs. Jobs and Wozniak. The comeback will be from the ground up and will start with innovation. No one trusts big anymore. In the future everything will be local. That's where the magic will be. And no amount of pessimism will stop it once it starts.”
The faith and hope in those ruby red shoes is evident in Noonan’s thinking. It may be that people will close their eyes, click their heels together, and eventually bring about a new America, but it will not be easy. It will take enormous effort, much struggle and sacrifice, and all the ingenuity and good will we can muster. The flip side of this effort is that old Wicked Witch out there, still lurking like the dark specter of Dick Cheney in a wheel chair—down but not out. The ‘bad guys’ have other ideas. Let us never forget what happened in Germany after that economy collapsed in the wake of the First World War. And let’s not forget what happened in Russia with the rise of Bolshevism and Communism when that revolution went down.
Change is a welcome balm, but change can also be very painful. It remains to be seen just what measure of pain the current crop of Americans will be able endure before they give up the ghost and let the men in black coats back into the White house in 2012. Make no mistake…the storm troopers are out there, still scheming and plotting and planning their return to power. Benjamin Netanyahu, a conservative hawk if ever there was one, was just invited to form a government in Israel. If you think the side show we saw in Gaza last January was interesting, just wait until Ben sets his mind on the big boogieman of Iran. And you can bet that somewhere, the disgruntled Neocons are looking for another dark horse to ride to the White House.

This is why the political winds of change that brought Obama to the presidency must not now abate into the gentle swells of appeasement to the old financial game that brought us to ruin. We can’t continue to throw money at the old system, or think we can just jump start the engine and get on with the buying and selling that once consumed our souls as we consumed an endless stream of imported plastic and cloth from China.
The NY Times quoted Obama as he signed off on another $797 billion in stimulus spending: “I don’t want to pretend that today marks the end of our economic problems,” the president said on Tuesday at the signing ceremony in Denver. He added, hopefully: “But today does mark the beginning of the end.” Does it? No one knows, of course, but a bigger question may be whether we really want to know. One of the most persistent cultural tics of the early 21st century is Americans’ reluctance to absorb, let alone prepare for, bad news.

We are plugged into more information sources than anyone could have imagined even 15 years ago. The cruel ambush of 9/11 supposedly “changed everything,” slapping us back to reality. Yet we are constantly shocked, shocked by the foreseeable. Obama’s toughest political problem may not be coping with the increasingly marginalized G .O.P. but with an America-in-denial that must hear warning signs repeatedly, for months and sometimes years, before believing the wolf is actually at the door.”
Shocked by the foreseeable indeed! It amazes me that so few, particularly in our mainstream media, saw this crisis coming. One look at the rising value of home prices, paralleled by both personal and national debt lines, made it obvious to me that a bust was the inevitable backlash that was coming. A few intrepid bloggers, myself included, wrote articles on the impending nature of this crisis years before it happened, though I take no pride in that. Most of that time I felt I was just shouting at the wind, while “Flip That House” aired weekly on the Home & Garden Channel, a maddening image of what Americans were blindly busy with all across the nation in 2005. While I think the shock of the near term collapse has finally awakened most Americans from the dream of ever growing house equity and consumerism, I still feel they now cling to the belief that the authorities will fix it all again, and things will eventually get back to “normal.”
I’ll be labeled a doom-sayer if I beg to differ with that delusional thinking. What I do know is that if you believe things are difficult now, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet. That’s not doom and gloom, just plain common sense and a willingness to face the reality of our situation. Change is going to be far more dislocating than people now imagine. The NY Times asks: “Will Obama concede aloud that some of our “too big to fail” banks have, in essence, already failed? If so, what will he do about it? What will it cost? And, most important, who will pay?...But at a certain point, as in every other turn of our culture of denial, outside events will force the recognition of harsh realities. Nationalization, unmentionable only yesterday, has entered common usage not least because an even scarier word — depression — is next on America’s list to avoid.”
To better the Times one, I have already argued that the depression is not pending, not threatening as the next tsunami wave to sweep over our economy—it is already here. The shock to the markets was every bit as severe as the initial crash of 1929. The loss of equity, retirement portfolios, and jobs is now happening at a pace that would exceed the Great Depression of the 1930s. (See 11th hour, Part II for a comparison of our crisis to the 30s). In unemployment, for example, our current U-6 figure, which is the only number we can use to equate with how unemployment was tracked in the 1930s, is now at 13.6%. After the market crash of 1929 a look at unemployment data shows the figure stayed at 5% or less for at least seven quarters, yet we reached 13.9% in just one quarter!
Things that many astute observers saw coming long ago are now daily news headlines. The markets continued their swoon on Feb 23, with the Dow approaching 7000 and the S&P approaching 700. The depression is not threatening as the next evolution of this crisis—it here now, and well underway. Our task remains: what to do about it? James Kunstler is correct to realize our effort now should not be about restoring the old status quo and recovering our past glory, but about managing the severe contraction and down-scaling of our lives.

This means we will have to find a way to take care of millions of Americans who, even now, find it difficult to put food on the table and keep a roof over their head. And we have to do this in a way that does not involve FEMA camps. The effort now should not be about how to insure ‘counterparty risk,’ or pay off the big preferred stock and bond holders for BofA, Citigroup, and JP Morgan. It needs to be about securing adequate food, shelter, and medical care for the millions that are now struggling in this country to make ends meet—for one more tick down on the ladder of prosperity takes them from poverty to the streets, and we all know where that could lead.
The problem will not be solved by NORTHCOM, or by a brigade from the 3rd Mech Division now training for domestic deployment. Roll troops into an American city and all you do is invite our very own Iraq war—only this time it will be fought in our living rooms, gardens and towns—over here, and not over there. The government and congress had better get this, and that quickly. The next evolution of this crisis is already being previewed in countries all across the globe. We need, more than ever, a way to truly provide for the common good.

And it must begin with the realization that the wealthy in America have already reaped their harvest. If they have losses on the books for what they have done—so be it. They must take the same hard medicine that they seem so willing to allow Joe Sixpack to endure. If we continue to pledge our ever thinning dollar to the benefit of the banks, then history will take the same well worn path to civil unrest or all out revolution in this country. It is a path we must, and can, avoid if we simply admit the severity of the crisis, and then reorient our priorities and remaining assets to secure the wellbeing of the citizens who collectively remain the United States and America.
To do this we will need heart—not for renewed consumerism but for true compassion and caretaking of our neighbor. We will need intelligence, with plans aimed at social benefits and basic security for the people, and not at restoring the Good Old Boyz to their banking splendor, and we will need the courage to force our cowardly lions in government to do our will, and not the will of the banking elite. Hope and a pair of ruby red shoes might help as well.
So when will we begin to voice these demands? Yesterday could not be soon enough.

See also:

The Abyss Stares Back

SUBHEAD: On the eve of The State of the Union, we stare at reality. By James Kunstler on 23 February 2009 at Kunstler.com (http://kunstler.com/blog/2009/02/the-abyss-stares-back.html)
Image above: "New man, New Woman" by Alex Gray. 1984 from(http://alexgrey.com/a-gallery/nm-nw.html)
The public perception of the ongoing fiasco in governance has moved from sheer, mute incomprehension to goggle-eyed panic as the scrims of unreality peel away revealing something like a national death-watch scene in history's intensive care unit. Is the USA in recession, depression, or collapse? People are at least beginning to ask. Nature's way of hinting that something truly creepy may be up is when both Paul Volcker and George Soros both declare on the same day that the economic landscape is looking darker than the Great Depression.
Those tuned into the media-waves were enchanted, in a related instance, by Rick Santelli's grand moment of theater in the Chicago trader's pit last week when he seemed to ignite the first spark of revolution by demonstrating that bail-out fatigue had morphed into high emotion -- and that the emotion could be marshaled against public policy. The traders in the pit on-screen seemed to color up and buzz loudly, like ordinary grasshoppers turning into angry locusts preparing to ravage a waiting valley. "Are you listening, President Obama?" Mr. Santelli asked portentously. In the broad blogging margins of the web that orbit the mainstream media like the rings of Saturn, an awful lot of reasonable people have begun to ask whether President Obama is a stooge of whatever remains of Wall Street, with Citigroup and Goldman Sachs's puppeteer, Robert Rubin, pulling strings behind an arras in the Oval Office. Personally, I doubt it, but it is still a little hard to understand what the President is up to. For one thing, the stimulus package, so-called, looks more and more like national sub-prime mortgage itself, a bad bargain made under less-than-realistic terms, with future obligations fobbed onto whoever inhabits this corner of the world for the next seven hundred years -- and all to pay for a bunch of granite counter-tops and flat-screen TVs. I suppose Mr. Obama is burdened with the knowledge that the economic truth is so much worse than he imagined back in November that there is simply nothing to do at this point except pretend to serve up a "tasting menu" of rescue plans in the hope that markets and mechanisms might be conned back into compliance with our wish keep getting something-for-nothing forever. FDR already used the fear of fear itself trope, so Mr. O is left with little more than displaying pluck and confidence in the face of overwhelming bad news. The sad truth is that banking has become a Chinese fire drill -- a frantic act of futility -- as insolvent companies persist in covering up their losses in order to avoid the counter-party hell of credit default swaps that would ring the world's "game over" bell. This can only go on so long. All the chatter about "nationalizing" the banks really boils down to what kind of bankruptcy work-out will they be put through, how destructive will the process be, and how much of the pain can be shoved forward in time to people now in diapers and their descendants. Among the questions that disturb the sleep of many casual observers is how come Mr. O doesn't get that the conventional process of economic growth -- based, as it was, on industrial expansion via revolving credit in a cheap-energy-resource era -- is over, and why does he keep invoking it at the podium? Dear Mr. President, you are presiding over an epochal contraction, not a pause in the growth epic. Your assignment is to manage that contraction in a way that does not lead to world war, civil disorder or both. Among other things, contraction means that all the activities of everyday life need to be downscaled including standards of living, ranges of commerce, and levels of governance. "Consumerism" is dead. Revolving credit is dead -- at least at the scale that became normal the last thirty years. The wealth of several future generations has already been spent and there is no equity left there to re-finance. If contraction and downscaling are indeed the case, then the better question is: why don't we get started on it right away instead of flogging rescue plans to restart something that is DOA? Downscaling the price of over-priced houses would be a good place to start. This gets to the heart of Rick Santelli's crowd-stirring moment. Let the chumps and weasels who over-reached take their lumps and move into rentals. Let the bankers who parlayed these fraudulent mortgages into investment swindles lose their jobs, surrender their perqs, and maybe even go to jail (if attorney general Eric Holder can be induced to investigate their deeds). No good will come of propping up the false values of mis-priced things. No good, in fact, will come of a campaign to sustain the unsustainable, which is exactly what the Obama program is starting to look like. In the folder marked "unsustainable" you can file most of the artifacts, usufructs, habits, and expectations of recent American life: suburban living, credit-card spending, Happy Motoring, vacations in Las Vegas, college education for the masses, and cheap food among them. All these things are over. The public may suspect as much, but they can't admit it to themselves, and political leadership has so far declined to speak the truth about it for them -- in short, to form a useful consensus that will allow us to move forward effectively. One of the sad paradoxes of politics is that democracies do not seem very good at disciplining their citizens' behavior. The wish to please voters and the influence of campaign money overwhelm even leaders with mature instincts. In America's case, this could lead to what I like to call corn-pone Naziism a few years down the road. Someone will design snazzy uniforms and get us all marching around to "God Bless America." At the point of a gun. It's not too late for President Obama to start uttering these truths so that we can avoid a turn to fascism and get on with the real business of America's next phase of history -- living locally, working hard at things that matter, and preserving civilized culture. What a lot of us can see now staring out of the abyss is a new dark age. I don't think it's necessarily our destiny to end up that way, but these days we're not doing much to avoid it.

First Steps To Sustainability

SUBHEAD: Some excerpts from John Greer’s THE LONG DESCENT.
By John Michael Greer on 22 February 2009 in HopeDance
Image above: "Shelter" in Phnom Penh Cambodia by Maciej Dakowicz.From http://www.pbase.com/maciekda/image/48200736
Sooner or later in the process, we’ll see the breakdown of existing social, political, and economic forms and the rise of transitional structures. At some point, continental governments such as the United States and Canada will come apart, in fact if not in name, to be replaced by regional and local governments cobbled together on an ad hoc basis; the global corporate economy will be replaced by jerry-built local exchange systems, and so on. The more sustainable, stable, and effective these transitional structures are, the more people, technology, knowledge, and culture will make it through the couple of centuries that this whole process will take.
That last is the detail that has to be remembered. Nobody now alive will see the end of the process that’s now under way. The challenge we face in the short term is how to weather the next round of crises when it arrives. In the long term, the challenge is to get through the Long Descent with as much useful information and resources as possible, and to transmit them to the successor cultures that, to judge by past models, will begin coalescing sometime in the 23rd and 24th centuries. That means making sure that people right now have the information and connections they need to adapt constructively to the changes brought by the decline of our civilization, rather than backing themselves into one blind alley or another. It also means taking a hard look at some of the most fundamental ways people in today’s industrial societies think about the world.
First Steps Toward Sustainability
Many of the strategies just outlined extend well beyond the reach of the individual, and to some extent this cannot be avoided. The community, not the isolated individual, is the basic unit of human survival, and one of the central lessons of the deindustrial age will likely be the value of community connections. Still, there are things that individuals can do by themselves to start down the road to sustainability. For some people the following ideas will be impractical, and for almost everyone they will be at least a little inconvenient. All of them, however, will be an inescapable part of the reality most people will have to live with in the future — and quite possibly the very near future, at that. The sooner people concerned with peak oil and the rest of the predicament of industrial society make changes like these in their own lives, the better able they will be to surf the waves of industrial decline and help other people make the transition toward sustainability.
. Replace your incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescents. If you haven’t done this already you haven’t been paying attention. Compact fluorescent bulbs last about eight times as long as ordinary light bulbs, producing the same amount of light for a quarter the electricity. The less wattage you use, the less of a burden you put on the electrical grid and the biosphere. Go shopping for compact fluorescent bulbs this week, and notice the impact on your electric bill next month.
. Retrofit your home for energy conservation. Most of the lessons of the 1970s energy crises were forgotten long before the recent housing bubble took off, and nearly all recent residential construction leaks heat the way a sieve leaks water — not a good thing in a world of rising energy costs. Fortunately this can be fixed easily for a very modest investment of money and labor. Weatherstripping doors and windows, putting foam gaskets behind light switch and electrical outlet plates, and the like can be done even by apartment dwellers, and more extensive projects such as putting an extra layer of insulation in the attic are within the range of most homeowners and house renters. As energy prices rise, heat will once again be too precious to waste. Over the coming year, learn what you can do to conserve energy at home, and do it; your bank balance will thank you, and so will the planet.
. Cut back on your gasoline consumption. Our dependence on cars is as much emotional and psychological as it is practical, but few people are willing to take the step we’re all going to have to take sooner or later and actually get rid of their cars. Everyone can cut down on the amount of gas they use, however. Whether you do it by trading in a gas-guzzler for a more modest and more efficient car, cutting back on casual driving, walking or bicycling more, or switching to carpooling or public transit for your commute, each gallon of gas you don’t use helps stretch out the downside of the Hubbert curve and buys time for a transition to sustainability. Keep track of how much gas you use each month, and try to make the total go down each month.
. Plant an organic vegetable garden. Today’s agricultural practices depend on fossil fuels to power equipment, transport produce, and provide fertilizers and pesticides. This makes organic food gardening one of the skills that will be needed most desperately as fossil fuels run short in the decades to come. Pick up a good book on organic gardening and find a patch of soil for your garden, and you’re ready to go. Apartment dwellers can often use window boxes or half-barrels full of dirt on a patio or balcony as a micro-garden, arrange to borrow a corner of a house-owning friend’s yard, or get a patch in a community garden. It doesn’t matter if you can only grow a few pounds of vegetables over the course of the season — the important thing is getting past the steepest part of the learning curve before you need to rely on your own produce.
. Compost your food waste. Vegetable waste from your kitchen should go back to the soil, not into a landfill. Composting is a simple technology that does the job quickly, cleanly, and efficiently. Read a good book on composting and go to work. If you have a yard, set up a compost bin and use it for your kitchen and yard waste. If you don’t, talk to a friend who gardens — if she composts, she’ll likely be grateful for your compostable waste. If you own your home and your local code permits (most do), consider replacing your flush toilet with a composting toilet. In the deindustrial age, survival will depend on understanding nutrient cycles and working with them, not against them. You might as well get started now. . Take up a handicraft. The end of the age of cheap energy means, among other things, that economies based on centralized mass production are on their way out. In the future, just as in the past, most goods and services will have to be produced by local craftspeople or the end users themselves. The coming of peak oil requires the recovery of the old handicrafts people once used to preserve food, make clothes, fashion tools, and produce a hundred other things now shipped worldwide from sweatshops in the nonindustrial world. All these crafts require practice to master, so the sooner you learn them, the better off you’ll be.
. Adopt an “obsolete” technology. In recent decades, the social changes we are pleased to call “progress” have replaced many older, sustainable technologies with newer ones that use energy more extravagantly, wear out or break down more frequently, and depend on an ever widening network of other machines. These changes will come undone in a big way as the end of cheap energy makes most of the 20th century’s technological changes unsustainable. As energy supplies peak and begin to decline, a window of opportunity exists for some of the older technologies to be brought back into use before they are forgotten and have to be laboriously reinvented decades or centuries in the future. Many of them work just as well as their more modern replacements — a slide rule can crunch numbers as effectively as a pocket calculator, for example, and a hand-cranked beater will beat eggs just as well as an electric one. Choose an old technology that interests you and make it an everyday part of your life.
. Take charge of your own health care. Health care in the industrial nations has become a massive industry even more dependent on extravagant energy consumption and international supply chains than most. In the United States, at least, it has already become so costly that almost half of Americans can no longer afford even routine care, and it will likely be among the first economic sectors to break down as energy supplies contract and the global economy fractures. Older, less energy-dependent healing methods, most of them part of today’s alternative healing movement, offer one of the few ways of responding to this. Many of them can be learned and practiced, at least in a basic form, without a great deal of training. Choose a method of providing your own health care, learn its strengths and limitations, and use it to maintain your health and treat your minor illnesses.
. Help build your local community. The Petroleum Age saw the twilight of community across the industrial world and the birth of a mass society of isolated individuals tied to the larger society only by economic inter -actions. The results have not been good, and they will likely get much worse as the Petroleum Age ends and the economic glue of mass society comes apart. Many of the old institutions of community still exist, and new networks have begun to take shape in many communities. More than anything else, such networks need people willing to invest a modest amount of time in them. Choose one of them, get involved, and stay active in it.
. Explore your spirituality. At the core of the consumer society — and the fossil fuel-powered industrial system that spawned it — lies the conviction that the highest goals of human existence can be found in material consumption. This notion took shape in opposition to an equally dysfunctional belief that despised the material world and grounded all human hopes in an invisible otherworld on the far side of death. The bitter sibling rivalry between these twin ideologies has hidden from many people the fact that many other options exist. In the twilight of the industrial age, the faith in progress that buoyed the consumer economy faces extinction, but the hopes once confided to it deserve better homes. In spirituality as well as ecology, diversity is a positive good, and it’s long past time we discard the claim that every human being can, much less should, approach the great mysteries of existence in the same way. Whatever your own vision of spirituality may be, then, explore it more deeply, and study its teachings in the context of the coming deindustrial age. You may find that, seen in that light, those teachings make an uncommon amount of sense.
There are a good many other, similar steps that can be taken. Anything that provides functional alternatives to energy-wasting lifestyles lays foundations for the transitional societies of the late 21st century and ultimately for the sustainable successor cultures that will most likely begin to emerge in North America in the 23rd and 24th centuries. The important point, it seems to me, is to do something constructive now.

My HSF-DEIS Comment


SUBHEAD: A real comment to a fake Draft Environmental Impact Statement.

 By Juan Wilson on 23 February 2009 for Island Breath
(http://islandbreath.blogspot.com/2009/02/my-hsf-deis-comment.html)
 
Image above: A Davy Crocket tactical nuclear field weapon being calibrated during the Cold War. These devices were tested in Hawaii with DU (U238) substituted for weapons grade uranium. 

The following is a letter mailed today as my comment to the Superferry Draft EIS. Today is the deadline for postmarks on comments. Any comments must be mailed to both addresses listed at the beginning of the letter. to: 

Ms. Katherine Kealoha, Director, Office of Environmental Quality Contro
l235 South Beretania Street, Suite 702. Honolulu, HI 96813 

cc: Mr. Michael D. Formby, 
Deputy Director, Dept of Transportation Harbors Division 
79 South Nimitz Highway, Honolulu, HI 96813 

REGARDING PUBLIC COMMENT ON:

The “Statewide Large-Capacity Inter-Island Ferry” (HSF) Draft Environmental Impact Statement is a sham. (DEIS)
This DEIS document is a sham. It is a pseudo EIS (PEIS). It is an after-the-fact effort to provide cover for the State and HSF Corporation. An honest before-the-fact EIS, revealing the costs, cultural degradation and environmental dangers of Superferry operations would have scuttled the project. 

The State’s executive, transportation and legislature have, in effect, conspired to ignore the law-of-the-land to accommodate a privatized/military scam to finance building and operating two prototype Joint-High-Speed-Vessels (JHSV) for John Lehman (Chairman of HSF Corp) and the U.S. Navy. 

That said, I will comment on the PEIS. My focus is the environmental risks associated with potential contamination of the HSF with Depleted Uranium (DU) through it military use. The PEIS states in section 3.5.2 Depleted Uranium:

“Public exposure to depleted uranium (DU) is highly unlikely, and the risk of exposure via a large-capacity ferry vessel is considered non-existent. DU-containing equipment and munitions are not used in Hawaii. The risk of cross-contamination from contaminated ranges is highly unlikely given existing stringent controls that prevent military personnel and equipment from entering DU-contaminated areas, as well as controls that prevent contaminated military equipment from entering the U.S. Additionally, the military operates its own fleet of ships to transport its vehicles and equipment between the islands, and currently there are no plans for military us of a civilian large-capacity ferry vessel.“
This statement is patently false on several details. The US military has definite plans to use the HSF for transporting the Stryker Brigade from its its headquarters at Schofield Barracks to the Stryker firing range in Pohakuloa Fire Range on the Big Island. John Lehman was quoted saying so on 3/26/05 in Pacific Business News. 


Moreover, the loan guarantees that allowed the construction of the HSFs was granted by the U.S. Maratime Adminsitration on the condition that the HSF be part of Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement, or VISA, program that makes merchant vessels available to the U.S. Navy as needed whenever required. Until recently the US Army has strongly denied that DU had ever used in Hawaii.

The 4/23/08 Honolulu Advertiser detailed the DOD decision to leave in-place Depleted Uranium found at both Schofield and Pohakuloa, saying it was harmless. This contradiction demonstrates that either the military was ignorant or misleading in its statements about the existence of DU use in Hawaii. In either case this negates the assessment by the DEIS that there is no possibility of exposure in Hawaii DU.

Weapons platforms associated with the Stryker Brigade that use DU munitions include the M113 Armored Personnel Carrier, the Apache Attack Helicopter, the Cobra Gunship Helicopter, and 155mm towed Howitzer canons. The Superferry is designed to carry all of these platforms in its cargo bay.
In its “Brief Summary of DU” in 3.5.2 the DEIS states:

DU is a common, naturally occurring and radioactive substance. A normal part of rocks, soil, air, and water, it occurs in nature in the form of minerals. DU is a slightly radioactive metal toxic to humans when ingested in large quantities.

This statement gives the impression that even if there were use of DU in Hawaii, and it were to contaminate the equipment and personnel, there would be little danger. Nothing could be further from the truth. This is a false impression. “Depleted Uranium” is really a misnomer. It is radioactive Uranium 238. It is typically created as a residue in atomic energy plants or nuclear weapons processing. DU has a radio-active half-life of 4.46 billion years. It is associated with cancer and other human illnesses. That translates to DANGEROUS FOREVER.
As far back as January 2001 it was reported in The New York Times:
U.S. warned of Depleted Uranium in Kosovo By Marlise Simons on 9 January 2001 in the New York Times

“After the NATO bombing campaign of 1999, the United States urged allied armies to take special precautions on entering Kosovo because American ammunition littering the landscape contained depleted uranium that posed possible health risks.
A document called ''hazard awareness'' issued by the Joint Chiefs of Staff warned soldiers and civilians against touching spent ammunition or other contaminated materials. It said personnel handling the heads of anti-tank shells or entering wrecked vehicles should wear protective masks and cover exposed skin, and people involved in the more hazardous clearing tasks should undergo health assessments afterward.
The document, dated July 1, 1999, was circulated among the militaries of the countries involved in the Kosovo campaign, and Germany, France and other countries passed along the warnings to their soldiers.
The Dutch defense ministry said it gave specific instructions about how troops were to confront the uranium problem before they went to Kosovo. ''Our troops were told to mark or cordon off contaminated areas, avoid any contact and call in special demolition units,'' a spokesman at the foreign ministry said. A growing number of former peacekeepers from Europe and Canada have contracted cancer or cancer-like diseases. At least 15 have died of leukemia -- 6 in Italy, 5 in Belgium, 2 in the Netherlands and 1 each in Portugal and Spain.
While acknowledging the hazards, both the Pentagon and NATO, pointing to medical experts, have denied that any links could exist between exposure to depleted uranium and the illness and deaths of veterans. Defense ministries in several countries have acknowledged receiving the American document, which has not been released. It was made available to The New York Times in Europe today by a militry official from a NATO country.
While NATO officials said it was normal practice to inform troops about hazardous materials, the warnings about depleted uranium are likely to deepen concern in Europe. Ten countries have ordered investigations into possible links between the illness of soldiers and their exposure to depleted uranium. Only American planes fired such uranium-tipped weapons during the 11-week Kosovo air campaign, using some 30,000. Uranium is one of the heaviest metals, which makes it effective in piercing targets like tanks or concrete.
A byproduct of enriched uranium, the depleted form is only mildly radioactive, but when it pulverizes in an explosion or fire, its dust is considered potentially hazardous if ingested or inhaled. The German government said today that while it would not order mandatory screening of those who served in the Balkans, all 50,000 of them could ask for a free checkup at a military hospital. Portugal dispatched three cabinet ministers to Kosovo today and also sent a team of military inspectors after the recent death of a soldier from leukemia.
The Dutch ministry of Defense said it was reopening the investigation into the recent deaths of all soldiers, although only two died of leukemia. Several governments said they were still poring over health records to establish whether cancer rates among peacekeepers were different from those of the same age group of the population. The American document said that D.U., as depleted uranium weapons are known, ''is a safe and effective munition.''
But ''residual heavy metal toxicity in armored vehicles struck by D.U. perpetrators could pose possible health risks for those that access those vehicles,'' it said. The document says soldiers entering armored vehicles hit by depleted uranium weapons should wear masks and cover exposed skin, and should be examined and their potential exposure recorded. The document does not mention radiation, which is said to be weak in the employed form of depleted uranium. It recommended that suspicious debris be reported for clearance. It also said potential risks should ''be passed on to both nongovernmental organizations and returning refugees.''
Despite such warnings, 14 scientists from the United Nations Environment Program said they found remnants of uranium-tipped ammunition still lying around. The team, recently returned from a two-week mission in Kosovo, said it found remnants of depleted uranium ammunition accessible to playing children and animals. The team has urged that contaminated sites be restricted and cleaned as soon as possible.

It is clear that the US military intends to continue the use of DU munitions, regardless of collateral health concerns, because it is so effective in the field. Why worry about Depleted Uranium? Just ask any Gulf War One veteran. 

In 1991, the US allies fired almost a million depleted uranium rounds (or some 2700 tons). Today, about a third of those veterans are on disability. Many of the surviving vets claim they have been permanently disabled by widespread use of depleted uranium. Moreover, thousands of Iraqi civilian deaths have been attributed to DU poisoning. 

Birth defects here and in Iraq have also been reported. After the 1991 Gulf War, Colonel Doug Rokke served as the U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Project Director. Once in the field he found that an effective clean-up was unachievable and he was poisoned by DU himself. Rokke now agrees with the Untied Nations that the use of Depleted Uranium constitutes a 'war crime'. Below is a small portion of a statement he wrote in February 2007.


“I was assigned to the 3rd U.S. Army Depleted Uranium assessment team as the health physicist and medic by order of Headquarters Department of the Army in Washington, D.C. What we found can be explained in three words: "OH MY GOD". According to official documents each uranium penetrator rod could loose up to 70% of it's mass on impact creating fixed and loose contamination with the remaining rod passing through the equipment or structure to lie on the terrain.
On-site impact investigations showed that the mass loss is about 40% which forms fixed and loose contamination leaving about 60% of the initial mass of the penetrator in the solid pencil form. We found that standard radiacs will not detect this contamination. Equipment contamination included uranium fragments, uranium oxides, other hazardous materials, unstable unexploded ordnance, and byproducts of exploded ordnance.
U.S. Army Materiel Command documents sent to us stated the uranium oxide was 57% insoluble and 43 % soluble and at least 50% could be inhaled. In most cases except for penetrator fragments, contamination was inside destroyed equipment or structures, on the destroyed equipment, or within 25 meters of the equipment. During the 1994 and 1995 Nevada tests we found DU contamination out to 400 meters from a single incident.
After we returned to the United States we wrote the Theater Clean up plan which reportedly was passed through U.S. Department of Defense to the U.S. Department of State and consequently to the Emirate of Kuwaiti. Today, it is obvious that none of this information regarding clean up of extensive DU contamination ever was given to the Iraqi's.
Consequently, although there still are substantial radiation contamination hazards existing within Iraq these hazards have been ignored by the United States and Great Britain for political and economic reasons at the same time additional use of uranium weapons has occurred resulting in additional confirmed contamination.”

Dr. Rokke recommends that contaminated and damaged equipment or materials should not be recycled to manufacture new materials or equipment. However, the U.S. routinely returns weapons platforms from overseas combat duty. The Olympian, an Oregon newspaper reported in October of 2007 that the Stryker Brigade officially ended it second tour of duty in Iraq, citing: 
By Christian Hill | The Olympian • Published October 12, 2007
"The long, tough fight is over. The 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division (Stryker Brigade Combat Team) ended its second deployment to Iraq on Thursday during a welcome-home ceremony at which it celebrated the service of its 3,600 soldiers and their families and remembered its fallen."

In section 4.2.5.2 The DEIS states that:

“DU-containing equipment and munitions are not used in Hawai‘i and the risk of cross-contamination from contaminated ranges is highly unlikely given the existing stringent controls to prevent the military personnel and equipment from entering DU-contaminated areas, as well as the stringent vehicle and equipment cleaning procedures at the overseas location (just prior to being transported to the U.S.). “

It has been documented that there are serious challenges cleaning up equipment that has been in combat areas where airborne powdered depleted uranium has contaminated the environment. DU after impact in a munition is transformed into vapor and fine powder that is breathed by personnel. It can work its way into inaccessible parts of equipment. Extraordinary diligence is required to eliminate it from anything contaminated. Hawaii is scheduled to be headquarters for U.S. Army Stryker Brigade operations. Certainly many of the weapons platforms will be rotated out and back to theaters of operations. The Hawaiian public needs assurances that there is testing and mitigation of any military equipment that may have been in contact with environments contaminated with DU, has fired DU munitions, for been returned from combat before it is transported on ferries (HSF) carrying civilians.If we could trust the State of Hawaii and U.S. Military there might be reasonable tests made for risks associated with depleted uranium.
TESTING FOR, AND DETECTION OF DEPLETED URANIUM
After battle simulations on the Big Island, military cargo and vehicles could inspected for traces of radioactivity by an appropriate Hawaii State agency before they are loaded onto the Superferry. The Superferry itself could be inspected for radioactive contamination after carrying military shipments between Pohakuloa Fire Range and Schoffiled Barracks.
Public routes between Schofield Barracks and Honolulu Harbor as well as between Kawaihae Harbor and Pohakuloa Fire Range could be tested regularly for DU contamination. Parking areas and docks used in off-loading and on-loading Stryker Brigade vehicles and
equipment could be inspected regularly for radioactive contamination. But, given the record of the military, and without reliable testing for DU and possible mitigation, is seems prudent to expect the possibility of the spread of uranium 238 contamination of Oahu, Maui, Kauai and the Big Island by battlefield equipment transported on the Superferry for the Stryker Brigade between Schoffiled Barracks and Pohakuloa Range.
Since we know the military plans continued use of DU in its arsenal; and that it has been either ignorant or deceitful regarding DU presence in Hawaii, and considering the potential risk to civilians sharing public transportation with the military, it is urgent that the something effective must be done. As the military has found out with the discovery of DU at Schofield Barracks and Pohakuloa Fire Range, mitigation efforts due to the discovery of depleted uranium contamination is costly, time
consuming and prone to be only compromised effort. There is concern that any conventional cleanup procedure that might be employed to assure that the Superferry is not contaminated, might endanger the environment at large.

For example, the washing down of dusty military equipment at the Kawaihae Harbor dock before loading onto the Superferry could endanger the environment of the harbor and nearby reefs with radio-active runoff. Imagine. The very spot on the deck of the Superferry where a muddy Army Stryker (with a DU armed Bushmaster machine gun) is parked back from the Pohakuloa Fire Range carry an open civilian pickup truck (with food and camping equipment) bound for Hilo on the return leg. That should make anyone apprehensive.

MITIGATION RECOMMENDATION

The DEIS should restrict HSF operations to civilian and commercial use only. The Superferry and deny the military any use of the vessel that would include combat equipment or vehicles that are involved DU munitions or armor.

Juan Wilson: Architect-Planner (HI Lic #10138) PO Box 949 Hanapepe, HI, 96716


See also:
Island Breath: DU Confirmed at Pohakuloa 8/21/07
Island Breath: Army to leave DU in Hawaii 4/24/08
Island Breath: Your Comments on HSF-DEIS 2/19/09

Age of Abundance

SUBHEAD: Remembering the Dawn of the Age of Abundance.
By Peggy Noonan on 20 February 2009 in The Wall Street Journal
Image above: illustration from WIRED magazine about airlines providing broadband service. From
Monday morning, 11:30:39 Eastern Standard Time, and I had just hit send. I was in a wide-body 767, high above the continent. "This is so exciting," I wrote to a friend. "I am on an airplane going over the Rockies. I am sending you an email. Down there the settlers went in covered wagons. Up here on American Airlines flight something to L.A., I am surfing the Internet. There are ruts baked into the soil down there from the heavy wagons pushing west. I have never been on Wi-Fi on a plane before. I am looking down at the Rockies. 'These are the days of miracles and wonders.' " My friend, an Internet pioneer, a brave and steely-eyed entrepreneur, shot back a reply: "We fly higher than mere birds can fly." When I got home, I taped our exchange to a bookcase near my desk. In hard times we should not forget the magic of life, and the mystery.
I thought on the plane, for the first time in a long time, of the feeling of awe I had in 1990 and '91 and '92. I heard a man named Nathan Myhrvold speak of a thing called Microsoft. I saw a young man named Steve Jobs prowl a New York stage and unveil a computer that then we thought tiny and today we'd call huge. A man named Steve Wozniak became a household god as my son reported his visionary ways. It was a time so full of genius and dynamism that it went beyond words like "breakthrough" and summoned words like "revolution." If you were paying attention, if you understood you were witnessing something great, the invention of a new age, the computer age, it caught at your throat. It was like hearing great music. People literally said what had been said in the age of Thomas Edison: "What will they think of next?" What a buoyant era.
And for a moment, as I sent and received my first airborne Wi-Fi emails, I was back there. And I was moved because I realized how much I missed it, how much we all do, that "There are no walls" feeling. "Think different." "On January 24th, Apple Computer will introduce Macintosh. And you'll see why 1984 won't be like '1984.' " That was 25 years ago. The world was on fire.
It has cooled. And the essential problem with the crash we're in is no one can imagine quite feeling that way again. People can remember it, but they can't quite resummon it.
This isn't like the stock market crash of 1987 or the collapse of the dot-com bubble in 2001. People are not feeling passing anger or disappointment, they're feeling truly frightened.
The reasons:
This isn't stock market heebie-jeebies, it's systemic collapse. It's not just here, it's global. It's not only economic, but political.
It wasn't only mortgage companies that acted up and acted out, so did our government, but all the governments of the West, spending what they didn't have, for a decade at least.
And at the center of the drama is your house—its worth, or its ability to see you through retirement, or your ability to hold onto it. An extra added angst bonus: Those thinking now about retirement are just old enough to remember America before the abundance, before everyone was rich, rich being defined as plenty to eat, a stable place to live, and some left over for fun and pleasure. For them, the crash has released old memories. And it's spooking people.
Have you witnessed a foreclosure, or seen the growing log of pictures on the Internet? It happened to my family when I was a kid, and I didn't know how much it was with me until a woman in Los Angeles the other day mentioned she had a new chocolate Lab she'd adopted from a shelter. He'd been left behind when a family was foreclosed on. "They left him in the house with a bowl of water and a tennis ball." A neighbor heard him, saved him, and now he was hers. This story hurt like an old wound. There are a lot of such wounds out there. It's part of why people are hunkering down.
The best report on how the young are experiencing it all came this week from the Web site Boing Boing, from the writer Cory Doctorow, who asked readers, "How are you coping with collapse-anxiety?" He wrote, "For me, I think it's the suspense that's the killer. What institutions will survive? Which ones are already doomed? Which of the items in my calendar are likely never to come to pass? Will my bank last?" He continued, "What are you telling yourself? How are you all sleeping at night? Are you hedging your bets with canned goods and shotguns, or plans for urban communal farming? Are you starting a business? Restructuring through bankruptcy? Moving back in with your parents?"
His readers wrote back, creating a stunning thread that said, essentially, all of the above, and more. They went from the wry—one reader is "drinking more . . . feeling disconnected from reality . . . watching more TV and movies"—to the tough—one said, "When the world turns crazy the crazy turn pro." A number were moving in with relatives. In fact it sounded like the old days, before the abundance. Some were planting gardens. One said he was learning the ukulele so he could be a wandering minstrel. Mr. Doctorow told me the reaction was "stupendous" not only in terms of numbers but in terms of seriousness: These were people truly sharing their anxieties.
All of this hunkering down has stopped the great churning, the buying, selling and buying that was at the heart of our prosperity. In private equity firms, the churning was life. They bought a company, removed the fat, sold it at a profit, and bought another one. They kept moving. That's over. No one is buying now, and no one can sell.
Perhaps the biggest factor behind the new pessimism is the knowledge that the crisis is not only economic but political, that we'll have to change both cultures, economic and political, to turn the mess around. That's a tall order, and won't happen quickly. One thing for sure: Our political leaders for at least a decade, really more, have by and large been men and women who had fortunate lives, who always seemed to expect nice things to happen and happiness to occur. And so they could overspend, overcommit and overextend the military, and it would all turn out fine. They claimed to be quintessentially optimistic, but it was a cheap optimism, based more on sunny personal experience than any particular faith, and void of an understanding of how dark and gritty life can be, and has been for most of human history.
I end with a hunch that is not an unhappy one. Dynamism has been leached from our system for now, but not from the human brain or heart. Just as our political regeneration will happen locally, in counties and states that learn how to control themselves and demonstrate how to govern effectively in a time of limits, so will our economic regeneration. That will begin in someone's garage, somebody's kitchen, as it did in the case of Messrs. Jobs and Wozniak. The comeback will be from the ground up and will start with innovation. No one trusts big anymore. In the future everything will be local. That's where the magic will be. And no amount of pessimism will stop it once it starts.
editor's note: enjoy a little humor with this video http://barefootmeg.multiply.com/video/item/56

Ahupuaa management lessons

SUBHEAD: Traditional Hawaiian ways can perpetuate our ability to feed ourselves.
By Andrea Brower & Kawika Winter on 22 February 2009 for TGI -
(http://www.kauaiworld.com/articles/2009/02/22/business/kauai_business/doc49a0ee05c6e4e530883937.txt) Image above: Detail of painting "Ahupuaa" by Beth Marcil. From (http://s291.photobucket.com/albums/ll300/ranga95pie/?action=view&current=image_ahupuaa.jpg). Pre-colonial Hawaiian life was based around the ahupua‘a system of land and resource management, which evolved to protect the water and other resources that sustain all life.
A typical ahupua‘a, or land division, extended from the highest point in the mountains down to the sea. Ahupua‘a boundaries often followed watershed lines, providing each community with fresh water, fertile land, abundant marine life and forest resources. Working in concert with the other ahupua‘a within a moku (district), the Hawaiians created a community-based system of self-sustaining resource management.
Traditional Hawaiian ways of knowing, interacting with, and relating to the environment reflect a sustainable resource management ethic. The ahupua‘a system recognizes the connection between the health of the mountains, the ocean and the community; and the vital role that fresh water plays in linking it all together. Reflecting the value of water in Hawaiian culture, the word for fresh water is “wai,” and the word for wealth is “waiwai.”
Principles of ahupua‘a management enabled Hawaiians to sustain large and healthy populations without compromising ecosystem integrity. In fact, traditional agriculture and resource management methods actually increased biodiversity and key natural resources. Hawaiians developed agroforestry systems that minimized soil erosion, facilitated the emergence of water springs, and maintained high species diversity. Not only is biodiversity essential to nutrient cycling and ecosystem resilience, but it also provided Hawaiians with the resources to live in abundance and comfort.
To ensure adequate space for forests and agriculture in each ahupua‘a, pre-colonial Hawaiian communities applied careful land-use planning. Valley floors, where the most fertile soil is concentrated, were reserved for agriculture. They often included walled-terraces developed to grow kalo (taro), the most important staple food crop for Hawaiians. Houses were built on hillsides and in sandy areas in order to save prime agricultural lands. As contemporary Kaua‘i attempts to move towards more self-sufficient communities, we can look towards this model of reserving prime agricultural lands for agriculture to perpetuate our ability to feed ourselves.
Fundamental to the ahupua‘a system was community involvement. Everybody was responsible for upholding the principles of sustainable resource management and for participating in the work it took to maintain the ecosystem and community health. It was understood that ecosystems provide important services to society, including necessary resources, nutrient cycling, and a sense of place and well-being. Today, with over half of the world’s population living in cities, there is a severe disconnect between people and the environments and resources that sustain them. By looking to the ahupua‘a system and the values associated with it, we can gain knowledge and inspiration for creating the models that will sustain us in the 21st century and beyond.
An upcoming permaculture design course will be looking in greater depth at ahupua‘a resource management (activatekauai.org). The course will culminate in a two-day public forum of all agricultural stakeholders to identify challenges, design solutions, and implement food self-sufficiency on Kauai. To get involved with or learn more about the forum, contact andrea@malamakauai.org
• Andrea Brower works for Malama Kaua‘i, a local nonprofit sustainability group, and Kawika Winter is executive director of Limahuli Garden and Preserve, a branch of the National Tropical Botanical Garden.
See also: For PDFs of 24x36 plots, PNG files for publication, KMZ files for Googleeath or SHP files for GIS of Ahupuaa & Moku land divisions systems visit; Ea O Ka Aina: Hawaiian Land Divisions 1/30/12 Ea O Ka Aina: Mokupuni O Hawaii 9/25/10 Ea O Ka Aina: Na Mokupuni O Maui Nei 8/1/10

Responding to the Crisis

SUBHEAD: On the threshold of the collapse of this version of human civilization.
By Paul Chefurka on 20 February 2009 in Limits to Growth -
(http://paulchefurka.ca/Responding.html)
Image above: detail from "The Train to the Edge of the World", 1999 by Mark Bryan at http://www.artofmarkbryan.com/train_edge_world.html
You need a lot of converging failures to crash an airplane, let alone to cause what we're seeing in the world right now. Unfortunately for many of us, what we're seeing is a collapse.
The main reason we don't yet recognize what's happening to us as a collapse is because the true nature of what is waiting for us just around the corner is still only visible to a very few. Most of us view the situation as though we were peeking into a tiny keyhole, through which we can see only a small section of the vast room beyond. Those pieces that are out of our field of view complicate the situation rather dramatically.
Only a small number of people have the breadth of background and understanding needed to widen their view and encompass the full scope of our predicament. That range of knowledge goes beyond simple economics or environmentalism to include ecology, energy analysis, history, anthropology, biology, politics and maybe a bit of evolutionary psychology. Fortunately, just a smattering of knowledge in those other fields will suffice, so long as one has the inclination to weave the disparate threads into a full picture.
Focusing on just one field will not reveal our full situation (though ecology comes closer than most). I know people in the alternative energy business, for instance, who simply cannot believe that the financial crisis has dashed their dreams of a solar-powered civilization. Most of us prefer to believe that a few simple reforms affecting our chosen field of interest is all that is required. Most of us are tragically wrong.
We are standing on the threshold of the collapse of this version of human civilization.
Recognizing that fact radically changes your assessment of the oughts and shoulds that might be useful in addressing any aspect of the crisis. And it completely changes your ideas about what approach might be useful in addressing the whole thundering avalanche.
All change carries with it both challenge and opportunity. The greater the change, the greater both the challenge and the opportunity become. We are now face to face with the greatest opportunity for human growth that has ever existed, if we can only summon up the courage to seize it. Remember that courage is not fearlessness, but the ability to act even in the presence of fear.
My recommendations for preparations all revolve around changes in attitude. We need to understand that what humans have experienced for the last 500 years is not a birthright but a singularity. We need to remember that people are fully capable of feeling joy even in the absence of computers, flat panel TVs and MRI machines. Most importantly, we need to come to terms with the idea that all change -- even death itself -- is both inevitable and necessary.
This approach may sound pretty esoteric in comparison to developing wind turbines and solar panels. However, in the end those are just more shiny, ephemeral baubles of the intellect when what we need is the solid rock of the human spirit -- the spirit that has been with us since we became human hundreds of millennia ago. .

Monsanto to leave Kauai

SOURCE Jeri DiPietro ofstone@aol.com
SUBHEAD: Monsanto thinking of moving its Kauai operations to Maui and Oahu

By Nina Wu on 20 February 2009 from Maui Ohana -
 
Image above: Drivers stand in front of a Monsanto Chemical Company tank truck in the 1950s. Are they carrying the "safe" pesticide DDT? From http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/northeast/sites/wrexham/pages/flexsys.shtml
Monsanto Hawaii is transferring its current Kauai operations to its facilities on Oahu and Maui by a target date of May. "It's efficiency," said Monsanto spokesman Paul Koehler. "With the operations that are there, in terms of size and scale, we can achieve the same if not better results on Maui and Oahu because they have a larger footprint."
The transfer will affect about 30 positions on Kauai, although all affected employees have been invited to apply for other positions within Monsanto Hawaii. Koehler said there are more than enough openings to accommodate the transferred employees. Monsanto, a global company specializing in biotech corn seed crops, made the announcement to Kauai employees this morning, and is also offering a severance package option.

Monsanto Hawaii has been expanding its operations and workforce over the past several years, particularly on Oahu, Maui and Molokai. Monsanto in 2007 purchased 2,300 acres of former Del Monte Fresh Produce Hawaii land from the James Campbell Co. and expanded its lease of lands on Molokai. Currently, the company employees about 800 residents statewide.
See also: